My process is iterative and experimental, a practice of discovery rather than an attempt at resolution. The associations I have to recorded images and sounds may be recognized or even shared by others, but they are translated from my perspective and the material is often manipulated several times over and re-inserted into the work, and so the act of recording/play-back accentuates the layers of subjectivity.
Manipulation of images, video, and sound leverages the underlying structures of digital media to probe the boundaries boundaries of sensation and construction, evidence of the fundamental instability and contingency of reality and selfhood, influenced by the Derridean concept of deconstruction. My work often blends digital processes with analogue modes such as drawing or movement, reflecting my curiosity about digital technology’s capacity to shape contemporary ontologies by generating new forms of physicality and spaces for inhabitation, both for the individual and in the context of collective meaning and experience.
I do not see art and technology as separate. digital space is a lived space, is real and mutable, as proven by the effects of cyberbullying and digital organizing. I use digital tools to make perceptible the instability that has always existed: in selfhood, in material, in meaning. I manipulate images not to replicate emotion, but to express the magic and melancholy of something always just out of reach. became a way of translating a fleeting emotional experience into something perceptible, while still preserving its impermanence. The iterative nature of the work stems from an overwhelming wealth of possibilities, reflecting the exponentiality of emotional states, of “potential”, of alternate universes, of simultaneous growth and fracture.
The method of image combination comes out of an attempt to process the disorientation of being alive - the way pieces of past lives, memories, death, life, consciousness, unconsciousness, past present, the local the global, the personal, the collective, all are present at once, the impossibility of completeness.
The iterative quality speaks to form as well, as the work often takes shape as a series; I like to show elements of process, as I think the progression of a work is a window into the mind, perhaps leaving a trace of the feeling or thought process that sparked the creation of the work. I do not generally have an outcome in mind - instead each subsequent layer, action, or image is a product of immediacy rather than to achieve a certain effect, although at times I do have an intention of “creating more distortion” for example. I see this resisting of teleology as a practice, meaning the intention is the effect (much like meditation), and can act as a subversion of the commodification of aesthetics, time, and desire.