If you want soft, lightweight silicone headphones for swimming and open-ear awareness, choose MARLALL Soft Liquid Silicone; if you need Bluetooth and MP3 playback plus more listed playback time for gaming on land, choose ZOVIMAX Bone Conduction Headphones. For gaming, ZOVIMAX is the more practical pick because it offers two listening modes, while MARLALL is the simpler choice for a swim-first routine.
• MARLALL’s biggest strength: soft liquid-silicone overmolding, an ear-hook fit, and up to 7 hours of playback; trade-off: underwater listening requires MP3 mode, and Bluetooth is not available in water.
• ZOVIMAX’s biggest strength: Bluetooth and MP3 modes, 8GB of internal storage, and up to 8 hours of continuous playback; trade-off: its listed full charge takes 2 hours, and underwater use still requires MP3 mode.
• For MARLALL: choose it if swimming comfort, open ears, and a familiar ear-hook design matter more than Bluetooth flexibility.
• For ZOVIMAX: choose it if you want one headset for Bluetooth listening on land and phone-free playback in the water.
• Neither is a conventional sealed gaming headset: both use open-ear bone-conduction designs, so they do not offer the enclosed listening experience many gamers expect.
MARLALL is built around an uncomplicated idea: keep the ears open, make the fit comfortable, and provide onboard music for water activities. Its soft liquid-silicone overmold and ergonomic ear hooks are intended to spread pressure and help the headphones stay in place during swimming and other workouts. The product is listed at 22.68 grams, a useful detail for anyone who prefers to keep added weight low during longer wear.
For swimming, the key limitation is also easy to understand. Bluetooth does not work underwater, so the headphones must be switched to MP3 mode. MARLALL includes 32GB of built-in storage, and its magnetic charging cable can connect to a computer for managing files. Music from a phone app cannot be copied directly to the headphones, so a buyer should be comfortable transferring audio through a computer rather than treating the headset as a wireless extension of a phone.
How We Research
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
The stated playback time is up to 7 hours after a 1.5-hour charge. That should suit a swim session or a workout routine without requiring a particularly long charging window, though ZOVIMAX lists a longer maximum playback time. MARLALL makes sense for swimmers who value soft-feeling materials, open-ear awareness, and internal music storage. I would skip it if Bluetooth flexibility is central to your everyday listening or gaming setup. It has no listed noise control, and its water-focused strengths do not make it a substitute for a conventional gaming headset with enclosed cups.
ZOVIMAX is the more flexible choice between the two. It supports Bluetooth 6.0 for listening on land and MP3 playback when Bluetooth cannot reach through water. The internal 8GB memory is described as holding up to 2,000 songs, and a double-click switches between the two modes. That combination is useful for someone who wants to use one pair for phone-connected listening on a walk, then switch to stored audio for a swim.
Its open-ear bone-conduction design uses soft silicone pads and includes an adjustable strap. The listed driver is a 14.2mm dynamic driver, and the headset is described as having a call system. Those specifications give it broader day-to-day use on land than MARLALL’s more swim-focused presentation, but they do not establish how it will sound in a particular game or how clearly it will capture every caller’s voice. I would treat gaming performance as a question of fit for your setup, not as a guarantee of low-latency game audio.
ZOVIMAX lists up to 8 hours of continuous playback and a 2-hour full charge. Its IPX8 design is specified for submersion up to 5 meters for as long as 2.5 hours, with MP3 mode required underwater. The open fit can help you remain aware of nearby sounds, but it also means the headphones are not designed to seal out surrounding noise. Choose ZOVIMAX if you value Bluetooth on land, onboard storage, and a stated water-use depth and duration. Skip it if you specifically want MARLALL’s softer liquid-silicone overmold or the longer battery runtime suggested by neither product’s specifications.
Side-by-Side: Which Should You Choose?
• Best for Bluetooth and MP3 flexibility → ZOVIMAX. It supports Bluetooth 6.0 on land and MP3 mode for phone-free playback, with a double-click to change modes. MARLALL’s swimming use is MP3-only, and Bluetooth is not supported underwater.
• Best for a shorter listed charging window → MARLALL. Its stated charge time is 1.5 hours; ZOVIMAX lists 2 hours for a full charge.
• Best for more onboard storage → MARLALL. It has 32GB built in, versus ZOVIMAX’s 8GB. ZOVIMAX gives an estimate of up to 2,000 songs, but the storage figures are the clearer basis for comparison.
• Best for a specified underwater depth and duration → ZOVIMAX. Its sheet states up to 5 meters for up to 2.5 hours. Both products require MP3 mode underwater.
• Best for a swim-first fit focused on liquid silicone → MARLALL. Its soft liquid-silicone overmold and ear-hook design are central features. ZOVIMAX instead describes silicone pads and an adjustable strap.
• Best for everyday phone-connected use on land → ZOVIMAX. Bluetooth mode gives it a more straightforward route to listening from a compatible device. That may also make it the more adaptable of the two for casual gaming, though neither sheet establishes game-specific latency performance.
• Best for someone comparing neckband headphones for gaming → neither is a typical enclosed gaming headset. Both are open-ear designs. If awareness of your surroundings matters, that may be a plus; if you want sound isolation, consider what an open fit cannot provide.
• Best for someone searching for Bluetooth earbuds for gaming → ZOVIMAX is the closer fit, with a caveat. It offers Bluetooth on land, but it is an open-ear bone-conduction headset rather than a conventional in-ear bud.
I would choose ZOVIMAX for a mixed routine that includes gaming on land, phone-connected listening, and occasional swimming. Bluetooth plus MP3 mode gives it more ways to fit into everyday use, and its listed playback time is one hour longer than MARLALL’s. For gaming, that flexibility is the deciding point, not a claim that it provides specialized gaming audio. I would choose MARLALL instead if swimming comfort, 32GB of storage, and its soft liquid-silicone finish matter more than Bluetooth use.
FAQ
For land-based gaming, ZOVIMAX is the more practical choice because it supports Bluetooth on land, while MARLALL’s standout use is MP3 playback for swimming. Neither product’s listed specifications establish game-specific latency or compatibility with a particular console, so check your device’s connection requirements before choosing.
MARLALL lists 32GB of internal storage, compared with ZOVIMAX’s 8GB. ZOVIMAX lists up to 8 hours of continuous playback, while MARLALL lists up to 7 hours. The figures describe different advantages, so the better fit depends on whether storage capacity or stated runtime matters more to you.
They may suit someone who wants an open-ear design and awareness of nearby sounds, but neither is described as a conventional enclosed gaming headset. ZOVIMAX has Bluetooth on land; neither product sheet supplies a game-latency figure. For gaming, confirm that your device can connect to the headset and that an open-ear listening style works for your room.
• Cerwin Vega Mobile CV Over Ear Headphones vs BASN Bmaster 2Pin
• F FEYCH Replacement Ear Pads vs Hmoke Replacement Ear Pads
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.