If you want over-ear active noise cancellation and long listening sessions for study, choose Long Run Technologies Active Noise Cancelling; if you need compact, true wireless earbuds for calls and everyday portability, choose Monster Earbuds. The clearest difference is the listening format: a full-size headphone with active noise cancellation versus in-ear buds with environmental noise cancellation for calls.
Long Run Technologies Active Noise Cancelling vs Monster Earbuds at a Glance
• Long Run Technologies Active Noise Cancelling: Over-ear design, active noise cancellation, and up to 100 hours of listed battery life; the trade-off is a 375 g full-size headphone rather than a pocketable earbud.
• Monster Earbuds: Compact in-ear design, three ear-tip sizes, and touch controls; the trade-off is up to 8 hours of music playback per charge, with additional listening time available through the case.
• Noise-control difference: Long Run lists active noise cancellation for listening; Monster lists environmental noise cancellation, described for reducing background noise during calls.
• Long Run is for: Listeners who want an over-ear fit and extended battery life for study, work, or travel.
• Monster is for: Listeners who prioritize a compact carry, in-ear fit, and convenient controls for calls and everyday listening.
Long Run is the more straightforward fit if you want a full-size headphone for a desk, study area, or longer listening session. Its over-ear cups use memory foam, and its listed noise-control feature is active noise cancellation. That combination makes it the more natural option of these two for someone who wants headphones that cover the ears and has a dedicated study setup. The supplied information does not specify how much sound the cancellation removes, so I would treat the feature as a design distinction, not a guarantee of silence.
Battery life is the standout on paper. Long Run lists up to 100 hours of average battery life and a two-hour charge time. That may suit someone who wants fewer charging interruptions across a busy week of listening. It also offers Bluetooth 5.4, push-button controls, and a headphone jack. The wired connection is a practical option to have, though the listed details do not explain what cables or adapters are needed to use it.
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Updated: 2026-10-23 · 8 min read · Independent comparison
The design has trade-offs. At 375 g, this is a substantial over-ear headphone, not a tiny option to tuck into a pocket. Its 40 mm hybrid drivers and listed 20 Hz–20,000 Hz frequency range describe the audio hardware, but those figures alone cannot tell you exactly how it will sound with music, lectures, or video. Who should skip it: Skip Long Run if you specifically want lightweight, pocketable earbuds or prefer touch controls to physical buttons.
Monster takes the opposite approach: N-Lite 310 true wireless earbuds with an in-ear fit and a compact charging case. Three ear-tip sizes are included, giving you options to match the fit to your ears. Fit matters for day-to-day comfort and how securely earbuds stay in place, but the best tip size is personal. The product information describes an ergonomic fit; it does not establish that every listener will find the buds comfortable for long study sessions.
Monster lists 13 mm dynamic drivers, Bluetooth 6.0, and a frequency range of 20 Hz–20,000 Hz. The product description emphasizes boosted bass, which may appeal to someone who prefers fuller low-end sound. For calls, the specified feature is environmental noise cancellation, intended to reduce background noise so your voice comes through more clearly. That is a call-focused claim; it should not be confused with Long Run’s listed active noise cancellation for listening.
The battery arrangement is different from Long Run’s. Monster lists up to 8 hours of music playback on one charge, plus another 32 hours provided by the case. A 10-minute quick charge is described as providing up to two hours of playback. Touch controls cover functions such as playback, calls, volume, track changes, and voice assistants. Who should skip it: Skip Monster if you want over-ear active noise cancellation or prefer a single long listed battery runtime rather than charging earbuds and carrying a case.
• Best fit for an over-ear study setup → Long Run Technologies Active Noise Cancelling. It has over-ear cups with memory foam, while Monster sits in the ear.
• Best for a compact pocket carry → Monster Earbuds. The earbuds and charging case are described as compact and portable; Long Run is a 375 g over-ear headphone.
• Best for the longest listed playback between charges → Long Run Technologies Active Noise Cancelling. Its listed battery life is up to 100 hours, compared with up to 8 hours of music playback per Monster charge.
• Best if you want charging-case backup → Monster Earbuds. The case is listed as providing an additional 32 hours of listening time.
• Best for active noise cancellation while listening → Long Run Technologies Active Noise Cancelling. Monster’s specified environmental noise cancellation is described in connection with calls.
• Best for managing calls and playback by touch → Monster Earbuds. Its touch controls include call and track functions; Long Run uses push buttons.
• Best for choosing an ear-tip fit → Monster Earbuds. Three tip sizes are included. Long Run instead uses memory-foam over-ear cups.
• Best if a headphone jack matters → Long Run Technologies Active Noise Cancelling. It lists a headphone jack; Monster lists no jack.
Buying Considerations
Also consider how you prefer to manage listening. Long Run uses push-button controls and includes a headphone jack, while Monster uses touch controls and connects over Bluetooth. Monster’s Bluetooth 6.0 and Long Run’s Bluetooth 5.4 identify different wireless versions, but those labels alone do not establish which will work better with your particular devices or in your environment. Monster lists a 10-meter Bluetooth range; no corresponding range is provided for Long Run.
If you are searching for open ear earbuds for study, neither product is described as open-ear: Long Run covers the ears, and Monster is an in-ear bud. Likewise, shoppers looking for the best bone conduction headphones for study should know that neither sheet describes bone-conduction technology. And although someone may search for sweatproof sleep headphones for study, the available details do not establish that either model is designed for sleep or provide a sweatproof rating. Long Run is described as water resistant, while Monster’s description mentions IPX5 waterproofing; those are different product claims, and neither should be stretched into a promise of comfort for sleeping.
For battery planning, compare the formats rather than treating the numbers as identical. Long Run lists up to 100 hours of average battery life and a two-hour charge time. Monster lists up to 8 hours of music playback per charge, plus 32 additional hours through its case, and a quick-charge feature. The figures describe different use arrangements, so the practical choice is whether you prefer a headphone with a long listed battery life or earbuds that recharge from a case between listening sessions.
I would choose Long Run Technologies Active Noise Cancelling for a study-first setup because it combines an over-ear fit, active noise cancellation, memory-foam cups, and a listed 100-hour battery life. That is the more compelling combination for settling in at a desk without planning around frequent charging. Monster is the smarter pick if compact carry, touch controls, and call-focused noise reduction matter more. For study, my preference is Long Run, provided you are comfortable with a full-size headphone rather than earbuds.
FAQ
Are Long Run headphones better than Monster Earbuds for studying?
Do Monster Earbuds have active noise cancellation?
Monster lists environmental noise cancellation, described as helping reduce background noise on calls. Its information does not identify that feature as active noise cancellation for listening, which is the noise-control feature listed for Long Run.
Long Run lists up to 100 hours of average battery life and a two-hour charging time. Monster lists up to 8 hours of music playback per charge, with an additional 32 hours from its charging case; those figures describe different battery setups.
Monster is the more clearly call-focused option in the supplied details. Its environmental noise cancellation is described as helping reduce background noise during calls and online meetings, and its touch controls include call functions. Long Run’s information does not specify comparable call features.
• Houlyn Invisible Sleep Earbuds vs Mudtun 2026: Sleep Earbuds
• ZXQZYM USB C Headphones vs Veeniitosr Sleep Headphones
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.