Buy a fake Thailand Green Card【visit: hk965.com】【whatsapp:+852 92908202】【telegram:hz99888】Professional production of documents, including passports, visas, driver's licenses, ID cards, green cards, residence cards, various certificates, and utility bills Global shipping, safe and fast. Contact us if needed.,【Customized website: https://hk965.com】,【whatsapp:+852 92908202】【telegram:@hz99888】Buy a fake Thailand Green Card,Buy a fake Thailand Green Card. . . . . . . . Original by Yan Wenlong Guangming DailyArticle | Yan WenlongRecently, the Internet celebrity singer "Heilun" who became famous for imitating Jay Chou has been involved in copyright infringement disputes. He sang Jay Chou's famous songs in many bars or live house performances across the country, which was questioned by netizens.Many Jay Chou fans said that it is difficult to accept copycats of Jay Chou.With more and more doubts, the "Heron" tour has been suspended."Heilun" has been popular before and has many fans on social media. It is also nicknamed "Komodoren" by netizens.In the first half of this year, a video of "Heilun" singing "Stranded" with a broken voice became popular on the Internet. Because the video of the broken voice is very comedic, it is loved by people.Since then, some self-media have compared the state of "Heilun" singing "Stranded" during his peak period with the state after his voice collapsed, causing netizens to lament that "Stranded" had such a loss of vocal cords.This emotion about "Heilun"'s singing voice was projected into the fans' feelings towards Jay Chou who were no longer young, and promoted "Heilun" to become popular again."Heilun" also accepted the traffic and reproduced the famous scene of "Stranded" in many subsequent videos."Heilun" covers Jay Chou's song "Stranded"."Heilun" social media screenshotsConsuming the imitated is the fate of all imitators. Even "Porridge Cake Lun" who imitates Jay Chou but cannot sing needs to come up with a "cake filling in the opposite direction" as a gimmick to strengthen his connection with Jay Chou.Once an imitator chooses the path of imitation, he will inevitably be involved in infringement disputes in all commercial activities, because the reason why the imitator can be seen by people is ultimately through the light of celebrities.Especially for imitators such as "Heilun", who use the works of the imitated object as the source of short videos and live broadcast content, it is extremely easy to infringe on the copyright of others.The "Copyright Law" clarifies the right of performance, which refers to the right to publicly perform works and to publicly broadcast the works by various means.Performance right is a kind of property right. Article 38 of the Law stipulates that when using other people's works for performances, performers shall obtain permission from the copyright owner and pay remuneration.The performance organizer organizes the performance, obtains permission from the copyright holder, and pays remuneration.And if it is a "free performance of a published work that does not charge fees to the public, nor pay remuneration to the performers, and is not for profit," then no remuneration is required to be paid to the copyright owner.Contrary to the provisions of the Copyright Law, "Heron" took a legal sidestep on this tour - the public did not pay "Heron", but paid the bar fee to the bar to avoid that the fee was paid by consumers to watch the show.According to media reports, a bar in a bar on the "Heilun" tour that usually costs 800 yuan on weekends for a "Heilun venue" (which can seat 1 to 4 people) sells for 1,500 yuan, a price that has nearly tripled. Moreover, the bar does not offer regular free "standing tickets," which means you have to pay at least 600 yuan to enter.According to common sense, "Heilun"'s tour can never be "generated with love". In the end, the bar will definitely have to use part of this premium bar fee to pay performance fees to "Heilun" in various names.From this, it can be seen more or less that the "Heilun" team is deliberately avoiding the risk of infringement.When "Heilun" performed at the Shangcheng branch of the chain bar in Hangzhou, the minimum purchase was up to 6,000 yuan.In fact, even without "Heilun"'s public tour, many imitators or performers singing songs and receiving gifts through live broadcasts on the Internet are already an infringement. However, whether they are copyright holders, ordinary netizens, or performers, they have been able to maintain a delicate balance before.That is to say, as long as the performers have a certain degree of tolerance in their hearts, all parties will be able to live in peace.As for what this "degree" actually is, it is difficult for anyone to say clearly.However, judging from the "Heilun" incident, imitators need to understand that when you are already well-known on the Internet, you need to be careful when conducting public performances for profit offline, because your audience will upload the suspected infringing performances to the Internet to expand the circle. Once the circle is expanded, the balance and tacit understanding will be broken.An unknown resident singer singing a well-known singer鈥檚 hit song in a bar will not raise questions about copyright infringement, but Internet celebrity singer 鈥淗eilun鈥?will. This is probably a curse for all imitators: you can make money, but you can鈥檛 make money by going on stage.