From 2009 to 2010, Excel Environmental Resources conducted an investigation of the Aeromarine landfill on behalf of the Borough of Keyport. As part of that work, Princeton Hydro, LLC prepared a Baseline Ecological Evaluation (BEE) examining potential impacts to nearby waterways and ecosystems.
The reports identified contaminants in groundwater above New Jersey standards, documented elevated concentrations of volatile chemicals in soil gas, and evaluated potential ecological impacts associated with the landfill and surrounding waterways.
Sources:
Nov 2009 - Excel: Preliminary Assessment/Focused Site Investigation Report
July 2010 - Princeton Hydro (PDF page 196): Baseline Ecological Evaluation
Dec 2010 - Excel: Site Investigation/Remedial Investigation Report
Technical References:
2021 - NJDEP: Soil Gas Screening Levels
May 2021 - NJDEP: Vapor Intrusion Technical Guidance
Contaminants Exist
Excel's soil gas testing detected methane throughout the landfill and identified elevated concentrations of benzene, vinyl chloride, and other volatile chemicals. The report stated that the findings were consistent with a landfill that had not been properly closed and where waste remained highly concentrated beneath the surface.
Several of the contaminants detected exceeded NJDEP Soil Gas Screening Levels (SGSLs), which are used to evaluate potential vapor intrusion risks. NJDEP vapor intrusion guidance states that exceedances of these screening levels require further evaluation of the vapor intrusion exposure pathway. In the landfill investigation, benzene was detected at concentrations up to 1,086 µg/m³, approximately 68 times higher than NJDEP's residential SGSL of 16 µg/m³.
Records reviewed for this website do not indicate that a vapor intrusion investigation was performed following these findings.
Source: Site Investigation/Remedial Investigation Report, December 2010
Section: 3.0 SITE INVESTIGATION/REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION | 3.2.4 Soil Gas Survey Results (Page 3-10)
Source: NJDEP Vapor Intrusion Technical Guidance
Section: 2.0 RECEPTOR EVALUATION & SCREENING (STEPS 1 AND 2) | 2.1.4 Soil Gas Exceedance of SGSL (Page 15)
Excel found arsenic, vanadium, and PCBs in soil above the soil remediation standard, and multiple contaminants, including benzene, arsenic, and lead, in groundwater above groundwater quality standards. The report proposed engineering controls for soil contamination and a Classification Exception Area to address groundwater contamination.
Source: Site Investigation/Remedial Investigation Report, December 2010
Section: 4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Page 4-1)
Excel found arsenic in the landfill's cover material above the soil remediation standards. The report also found that the former landfill was not properly capped.
Source: Site Investigation/Remedial Investigation Report, December 2010
Section: 4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Page 4-2)
Multiple metals were found in soil at concentrations above ecological screening levels. Elevated metal concentrations were found across the site and persisted to depths of at least 25 feet below the surface.
Source: Baseline Ecological Evaluation, July 2010 (Page 14)
Potential Pathways Exist
Excel identified the site's stormwater system as a potential pathway to the Chingarora Creek. One stormwater grate was reported to discharge directly into the creek.
Source: Preliminary Assessment/Focused Site Investigation Report, November 2009
Section: 4.4 Summary of AOCs and Potential Issues of Environmental Concern (Page 4-11)
Princeton Hydro identified eroded soil and groundwater movement as potential pathways for contaminants to reach Raritan Bay and Chingarora Creek. The report concluded that ecological risks from groundwater were likely negligible.
Source: Baseline Ecological Evaluation, July 2010 (Page 13)
Groundwater flows outward from the landfill toward Raritan Bay and Chingarora Creek.
Source: Site Investigation/Remedial Investigation Report, December 2010
Section: 3.0 SITE INVESTIGATION/REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION | 3.2.7.1 Tidal Survey Results (Page 3-12)
Source: Site Investigation/Remedial Investigation Report, December 2010
Section: FIGURE 8 GROUNDWATER ELEVATION CONTOUR MAP (SHALLOW WELLS) LOW TIDE: MAY 12, 2010 (PDF page 88)