If you want wireless freedom, long battery life, and app-based sound adjustment for mobile gaming, choose JBL Tune 520BT; if you need a simple wired headset with sound-isolating ear pads, choose JVC HAS160B. The JBL is the more flexible pick for a phone without a headphone jack, while the JVC avoids charging and Bluetooth entirely.
One important distinction: these are both on-ear headphones, not earbuds. For mobile gaming, the choice comes down to whether wireless convenience and up to 57 hours of battery life matter more to you than a wired connection and passive sound isolation.
• JBL Tune 520BT: Bluetooth 5.3, customizable EQ through the JBL Headphones app, and up to 57 hours of battery life; the trade-off is that it has no headphone jack and no listed noise control.
• JVC HAS160B: A 3.5 mm wired connection, 30 mm drivers, and soft ear pads designed to isolate outside sound; the trade-off is that it has no built-in microphone and depends on a cable.
• JBL is for: Players who want wireless listening, adjustable sound, and a rechargeable headset that can also handle calls.
• JVC is for: Players who prefer a direct wired connection, want to avoid battery management, and value passive isolation.
• Neither is an ANC or bone-conduction model: If you are searching for “anc bone conduction headphones for mobile gaming,” these two do not offer either feature.
The JBL Tune 520BT is the practical choice if you want to play on a phone without managing a headphone cable. Bluetooth 5.3 gives it a wireless connection, and the JBL Headphones app lets you adjust the EQ to suit your listening preferences. That is useful if you want to emphasize bass for game sound effects or change the balance for music between sessions. The listed sound feature is JBL Pure Bass; no noise-control feature is specified.
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Updated: 2026-10-22 · 6 min read · Independent comparison
Battery life is a strong point on paper: JBL lists up to 57 hours, with a full recharge taking about two hours over USB-C. A five-minute charge is listed as providing three additional hours of music. Those figures make the Tune 520BT appealing for long stretches of listening or gaming without frequent charging, though battery life can vary with use. It also folds flat for carrying and includes ear-cup buttons for audio and call controls. Voice Aware lets you hear your own voice during calls.
I’d consider it for someone who wants a wireless all-purpose pair for mobile gaming, music, and calls. Its Bluetooth connection may suit a phone-based setup better than a wired model if you want to move around without a cord. But it is not a dedicated gaming headset based on the listed features: no gaming mode or microphone performance details are given. Skip it if you specifically need wired audio, active noise cancellation, or a headphone jack.
The JVC HAS160B takes the simpler route. It connects through a 3.5 mm jack, so there is no battery to charge and no Bluetooth pairing to manage. Its 30 mm neodymium drivers and stated frequency range of 12–24,000 Hz describe the hardware, but those figures alone do not establish how it will sound in every game or with every phone.
Soft ear pads are intended to provide sound isolation, and the adjustable steel headband is designed to adapt to the wearer. The headphones fold flat for easier packing. That combination makes the JVC a straightforward option for someone who wants a wired pair for a commute, desk, or gaming session and prefers a physical connection over wireless convenience. The isolation is passive; the product does not list active noise cancellation.
The main compromise is the cable. A phone needs a compatible 3.5 mm connection, either directly or through an adapter, and the cord can get in the way if you move around. JVC lists no microphone, so I would not choose this as a call-focused headset. If you want wireless audio, app-based EQ, or a long stated battery life, the JBL is the better fit.
Side-by-Side: Which Should You Choose?
• Best for wireless play → JBL Tune 520BT. It uses Bluetooth 5.3, while the JVC HAS160B is wired through a 3.5 mm jack.
• Best for avoiding battery checks → JVC HAS160B. It has a wired connection and no battery-life figure to manage.
• Best for adjusting the sound → JBL Tune 520BT. Its companion app includes EQ customization; no equivalent feature is listed for the JVC.
• Best for passive sound isolation → JVC HAS160B. Its soft ear pads are described as providing sound isolation, though that is not the same as active noise cancellation.
• Best for calls → JBL Tune 520BT. It includes hands-free call controls and Voice Aware; the JVC is listed as having no microphone.
• Best for a phone with a headphone jack → JVC HAS160B. Its 3.5 mm plug provides a direct wired option, while the JBL has no headphone jack.
• Best for a mobile setup that doubles as a music and call pair → JBL Tune 520BT. Its wireless design, app EQ, and call features make it the more versatile of these two on the listed specs.
If you are looking for multipoint head phones for mobile gaming, neither product’s listed features confirm multipoint connectivity. Likewise, neither is an ANC bone conduction option: both use on-ear designs, and the JVC’s isolation comes from its ear pads rather than active noise cancellation. For shoppers asking for the best headset for mobile gaming, the more useful question here is whether wireless convenience or a wired connection better suits the phone and the way you play.
I’d choose the JBL Tune 520BT for mobile gaming because Bluetooth 5.3, app-based EQ, call controls, and up to 57 hours of listed battery life make it the more adaptable everyday pair. The JVC HAS160B remains a sensible alternative if I wanted a simple wired connection and passive isolation, but the JBL covers more listening situations without a cable. Neither should be mistaken for a dedicated gaming headset with features not listed here.
FAQ
Neither product lists active noise cancellation. The JVC’s soft ear pads are described as providing sound isolation, which is passive; the JBL lists no noise-control feature.
The JVC is listed as having no microphone, so it is not the appropriate choice if you need a built-in mic for calls. The JBL includes hands-free call controls and Voice Aware.
Choose the JVC HAS160B if you are comfortable using a wired 3.5 mm connection. It does not need battery charging, while the JBL is rechargeable and lists up to 57 hours of use.
• MICMXMO Replacement Microphone vs Zosvoses QC35
• ISCREM Headset vs REEYEAR PSVR2
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.