If you want wireless freedom, long battery life, and multipoint switching for mobile gaming, choose JBL Tune 510BT; if you need a simple wired pair that folds flat, choose JVC HAS160A. For gaming on a phone, I’d lean JBL because Bluetooth and up to 40 hours of battery life make it easier to use without a cable. JVC makes more sense if you specifically want a 3.5 mm connection and don’t need wireless features.
• JBL Tune 510BT: Up to 40 hours of battery life, Bluetooth, and the ability to switch between two devices; the trade-off is that it has no headphone jack.
• JVC HAS160A: A wired 3.5 mm connection, flat-folding design, and soft ear pads; the trade-off is that it has no Bluetooth and no microphone listed.
• Choose JBL if you want wireless listening, calls, and a headset you can move between a phone and another device.
• Choose JVC if a direct cable connection and a straightforward, foldable design matter more than wireless convenience.
• Neither model lists active noise cancellation, so don’t choose either expecting ANC.
The JBL Tune 510BT is an on-ear wireless headphone with Bluetooth 5 and up to 40 hours of battery life. A five-minute charge is listed as enough for two additional hours of listening, while a full charge takes about two hours. That combination suits someone who wants headphones ready for commutes, study sessions, or long stretches of mobile gaming without needing to stay plugged into a phone.
Its ability to switch between two Bluetooth devices is useful if you move between a tablet and a phone. You could be listening on one device and switch over when a call comes in. There’s also a microphone on the ear cup for hands-free calls, plus buttons for managing sound and calls. The multi-function button can activate Siri or Google Assistant on a compatible device.
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Updated: 2026-10-18 · 6 min read · Independent comparison
I’d choose the JBL if wireless use, longer battery life, and device switching are the priorities. Its on-ear fit, adjustable headband, soft ear cushions, and padded headband are intended to make it wearable for extended listening. But it has no headphone jack and no listed noise control. If you prefer a cable, want to avoid charging, or need active noise cancellation, this isn’t the right fit.
The JVC HAS160A is a wired on-ear headphone with a 3.5 mm plug. Its flat-folding design is made for easier packing, and its soft ear pads provide a more cushioned contact point around the ears. For someone who wants a simple pair to carry in a bag and connect directly to a device with a headphone jack, that’s a clear, practical setup.
JVC lists a 30 mm driver and a frequency range of 12 Hz to 24,000 Hz. Those figures describe the headphone’s audio specifications, but they don’t tell the whole story of how it will sound with a particular game, phone, or music track. The steel headband is adjustable, and the soft pads are described as helping isolate ambient sound. That is passive isolation from the ear-pad design, not active noise cancellation.
The JVC is a better match if you want wired listening without worrying about headphone battery life. It is also the more straightforward option for a device with a compatible 3.5 mm jack. The trade-off is that it has no listed Bluetooth connection or microphone. If you want wireless freedom, hands-free calls, or easy switching between devices, I’d pick the JBL instead.
• Best for wireless mobile gaming → JBL Tune 510BT. Bluetooth lets you listen without a headphone cable running to your phone, and the listed battery life is up to 40 hours.
• Best for a direct wired connection → JVC HAS160A. Its 3.5 mm plug avoids Bluetooth pairing and charging, provided your device has a compatible headphone jack.
• Best for switching between two devices → JBL Tune 510BT. It can switch between two Bluetooth devices, which is handy if you move between a tablet and phone.
• Best for hands-free calls → JBL Tune 510BT. It has a microphone on the ear cup and controls for managing calls. The JVC sheet lists no microphone.
• Best for packing flat → JVC HAS160A. Its flat-folding design is the clear choice if you want headphones that fold down for a bag.
• Best for long sessions without recharging → JVC HAS160A. Its wired design has no battery to charge. The JBL’s battery lasts longer between charges than many people may need, but it still needs power.
• Best for a quick battery top-up → JBL Tune 510BT. A five-minute charge is listed as providing two more hours of music.
• Best for active noise cancellation → Neither. Both list no noise control. The JVC’s soft ear pads are described as providing passive isolation, but that is not the same as ANC.
If you’ve been searching for multipoint head phones for mobile gaming, the JBL is the closer match because it can switch between two Bluetooth devices. That doesn’t make it a dedicated gaming headset, though: the listed features focus on Bluetooth listening, calls, and device switching, not gaming-specific functions.
My Verdict
I’d buy the JBL Tune 510BT for mobile gaming because wireless Bluetooth, up to 40 hours of battery life, and two-device switching fit phone use better. It also adds an ear-cup microphone for calls.
I’d choose the JVC instead if I wanted a wired 3.5 mm connection and a flat-folding design.
In my opinion, the JBL is the more practical pick for someone comparing these as everyday mobile headphones, though neither is a substitute for a feature-specific gaming headset.
I’d choose the JBL Tune 510BT if you want Bluetooth and don’t want a headphone cable connected to your phone. The JVC HAS160A is a sensible option when you prefer a wired 3.5 mm connection.
Neither product lists active noise cancellation. The JVC’s soft ear pads are described as helping block ambient sound through the fit, while the JBL lists no noise control.
The JVC product information does not list a microphone. The JBL Tune 510BT does include a microphone on the ear cup for hands-free calls.
Which is the best headset for mobile gaming?
• best over ear headphones for studying
• Isobel Ultimate vs Erewll 2026: Bluetooth Headphones for
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.