If you want wireless freedom, long battery life, and more flexible device switching for mobile gaming, choose JBL Tune 510BT; if you need a simple wired headset with passive sound isolation, choose JVC HAS160R. For most phone gamers, I’d pick the JBL: its Bluetooth connection and up to 40 hours of battery life suit play away from a desk. The JVC is the simpler option when you prefer a cable and don’t want to manage charging.
• JBL Tune 510BT: Bluetooth listening, up to 40 hours of battery life, and switching between two devices; the trade-off is that it has no headphone jack and no stated noise control.
• JVC HAS160R: Wired 3.5 mm connection, fold-flat design, and soft pads intended to isolate ambient sound; the trade-off is that it has no microphone and needs a compatible headphone jack.
• Choose JBL for mobile gaming, wireless listening, calls, and moving between two Bluetooth devices.
• Choose JVC for straightforward wired listening, a portable foldable design, and passive sound isolation.
The JBL Tune 510BT is an on-ear wireless headphone built around Bluetooth convenience. It can connect to a phone or another compatible device without a cable, and it can switch between two devices. That can be useful if you game on a tablet but also want to keep your phone connected for calls. The JBL also has a microphone on the ear cup for hands-free calls, plus buttons for managing sound and calls.
For mobile gaming, its biggest practical advantage is freedom from a wired connection. Its battery is rated for up to 40 hours, and a five-minute charge is specified to add two hours of listening. Those figures make it appealing for someone who uses headphones throughout the day and would rather charge occasionally than stay tethered to the phone. It also supports Siri or Google Assistant through a button.
How We Research
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Updated: 2026-10-18 · 6 min read · Independent comparison
The JVC HAS160R takes the uncomplicated route: it connects through a 3.5 mm headphone jack. There’s no battery to recharge and no Bluetooth pairing to manage. Its 30 mm driver units, soft ear pads, and adjustable steel headband describe a conventional wired on-ear design for listening at home, at a desk, or on a commute with a compatible device.
Its fold-flat construction is useful if you want headphones that can be packed away without a bulky shape. JVC also describes the pads as providing sound isolation, which means the design is intended to help reduce surrounding noise passively. That is different from active noise cancellation: the supplied details specify isolation from the ear pads, not electronic cancellation.
The key limitation is the lack of a microphone. That makes the JVC a poor match if you need headset-style calls or want to communicate while gaming. It also has no Bluetooth connection, so it needs a device with a 3.5 mm jack or an appropriate compatible connection. Choose it for wired simplicity and portability, not for wireless play or voice chat.
• Best for wireless mobile gaming → JBL Tune 510BT. Bluetooth means no headphone cable running to the phone or tablet.
• Best for a wired connection → JVC HAS160R. Its 3.5 mm jack avoids Bluetooth pairing and battery management.
• Best for long listening between charges → JBL Tune 510BT. It is rated for up to 40 hours, with a five-minute recharge adding two hours of listening.
• Best for switching between two devices → JBL Tune 510BT. It can move between Bluetooth sources, such as a tablet and phone.
• Best for hands-free calls → JBL Tune 510BT. It has an ear-cup microphone and call controls; the JVC is listed without a microphone.
• Best for passive sound isolation → JVC HAS160R. Its soft ear pads are designed to help block ambient sound. The JBL lists no noise control.
• Best for packing flat → JVC HAS160R. Its flat-folding design is meant to make it easier to slip into a bag.
• Best for voice-assistant access → JBL Tune 510BT. A button can activate Siri or Google Assistant on a compatible device.
One common search is for “multipoint head phones for mobile gaming.” The JBL’s ability to switch between two devices makes it the closer fit in this comparison, though the available details don’t specify simultaneous audio from both devices. If you’re searching for “anc bone conduction headphones for mobile gaming,” neither of these matches that description: both are on-ear headphones, and neither sheet lists active noise cancellation or bone-conduction technology.
The phrase “best headset for mobile gaming” also needs a little care here. The JBL is the more practical of these two for wireless play and voice chat, thanks to Bluetooth, its microphone, and device switching. But the product details don’t specify gaming latency, so I wouldn’t assume it will be ideal for games where tight audio timing is essential. The JVC avoids wireless latency concerns by using a cable, but its lack of a microphone limits it for multiplayer communication.
In my opinion, I’d choose the JBL Tune 510BT for mobile gaming because it combines Bluetooth, up to 40 hours of battery life, and a microphone for calls. Its ability to switch between two devices is a useful extra for someone moving between a phone and tablet.
I’d choose the JVC HAS160R instead if wired simplicity and passive sound isolation matter more than calls or wireless freedom. For most people deciding between these two, the JBL is the more versatile everyday pick.
The JBL is the better fit if you want Bluetooth and a built-in microphone. The JVC uses a 3.5 mm cable, which may suit wired play, but it has no microphone for voice chat.
Neither product’s listed details specify active noise cancellation. The JVC has soft pads described as providing sound isolation, while the JBL lists no noise control.
Can I use the JVC HAS160R for calls or multiplayer chat?
That depends on what you need: Bluetooth, a microphone, and long battery life favor the JBL, while a wired connection and fold-flat portability favor the JVC. Check the current price on Amazon before deciding; the right value depends on the price you find and which features matter to you.
• PocBuds Headphones vs Soothielec Headset
• LC-dolida BambooCotton 3D vs AHUIARGY Sleep Mask
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.