I’m an Assistant Professor of Roman Law with a background in Classical Philology and Literary Studies, working in the in-between, where law and literature borrow each other’s tricks.
I use philological and hermeneutical approaches to study Roman law and literature in order to open up our understanding of how legal thinking, language, and rules bring each other to life, and how this subtle interplay extends far beyond the scope of juristic sources.
I gave my academic heart to Roman jurists and wrote a book on utilitas in their thought. I trace legal echoes in Roman satire and teach law students Latin in Latin.
I like how interpretation sharpens when you let the words bite back, take ideas seriously but not grimly, and believe that joy and rigor can share a desk.
Roman Jurisprudence
Legal Interpretation, Argumentation, and Thinking
(Roman) Law and Literature
Ancient Rhetoric
Roman Satire
Living Latin
Franz Steiner Verlag · Stuttgart 2025
A study of how Roman jurists used utilitas not as a pragmatic shortcut but as a principle anchoring legal interpretation in ethical values.
Iusculum: A Latin Course for Lawyers, partly taught in Latin, designed to introduce law students to Latin in a fresh, immersive way
The project In a Distorting Mirror? Law as Presented in Roman Satire, supported by the Polish National Science Centre (grant no. 2021/41/N/HS2/02500), exploring how law is portrayed in Roman satirical literature
Index 2.0 – a project aiming to build a digital platform for text-critical studies of Roman law, based on the Index Interpolationum. The research team includes Marton Ribary (Royal Holloway), Giuseppe Di Donato (Edinburgh Napier), Julien Danneau (UCLouvain), and myself