If you want active noise cancelling, more total playback time, and wireless charging for hunting, choose JBL Tour Pro+ TWS; if you need a lighter everyday option with multipoint and a simple button interface, choose Sony WF-C510.
JBL Tour Pro+ TWS vs Sony WF-C510 at a Glance
• JBL Tour Pro+ TWS: Adaptive noise cancelling, Smart Ambient, and up to 32 hours of total music playback; trade-off: its in-ear design and noise-cancelling focus may not suit someone who wants to hear the environment without adjusting settings.
• Sony WF-C510: Compact design, Ambient Sound Mode, multipoint connection, and up to 22 hours of total playback; trade-off: no noise control is listed, and wireless charging is not specified.
• For calls and voice control: JBL includes three microphones and supports voice assistants; Sony’s listed advantages are button controls and everyday listening features.
• For switching between devices: Sony’s multipoint connection supports pairing with two Bluetooth devices simultaneously; the JBL sheet does not list multipoint.
• For hunting: Choose JBL if adjustable noise management and longer stated total playback matter more; choose Sony if you prefer a straightforward button-operated earbud and do not need noise cancelling.
The JBL Tour Pro+ TWS is the more feature-rich choice for someone who wants to shape how much of the outside world comes through. Adaptive Noise Cancelling uses internal and external microphones to reduce distractions, while Smart Ambient can help you stay aware or hear people nearby. That flexibility is relevant during everyday travel and could be useful around a hunting trip’s quieter moments, when you want to listen to audio but still have some awareness of your surroundings. It is not an open-ear earbud, though, and the product information does not describe it as hearing protection.
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Updated: 2026-10-17 · 6 min read · Independent comparison
JBL also has the longer stated total playback figure: up to 32 hours, with three power-ups in the case. It supports Qi-compatible wireless charging and has a three-microphone arrangement intended to improve call clarity, including a microphone designed to reduce wind and other distractions. Voice access to Google Assistant or Amazon Alexa is another practical option when you would rather not reach for a phone.
I’d consider the JBL if you want noise cancelling, ambient listening controls, voice-assistant access, and a case that supports wireless charging. I’d skip it if your priority is a simple button-operated pair, multipoint connection, or an open-ear fit. Its snug in-ear fit matters too: the product information notes that mismatched tips or poor placement can affect sound and call performance, so the fit is part of the buying decision rather than a small detail.
The Sony WF-C510 focuses on a compact, lightweight in-ear design and uncomplicated everyday use. It offers Ambient Sound Mode, EQ customization, and Multipoint Connection, which lets it connect to two Bluetooth devices simultaneously. That makes it a natural fit for someone who switches between, say, a phone and another Bluetooth device and wants to manage music with physical buttons.
Sony’s stated playback time is up to 11 hours from the earbuds, with another 11 hours in the case, for up to 22 hours total. A five-minute quick charge is listed as providing up to an hour of playback. Those figures make it a practical option for regular listening across a day, though they fall short of the JBL’s stated total. The WF-C510 also uses Sony’s DSEE processing and sound tuning, with EQ customization for adjusting the listening profile.
I’d choose the Sony if compactness, multipoint, and button controls matter more than active noise cancelling or wireless charging. I’d look elsewhere if noise reduction is essential, or if you specifically want an open-ear headphone for hunting: the WF-C510 is an in-ear model, and its listed noise-control feature is “None.” Its Ambient Sound Mode is a listening feature, not a stated guarantee of awareness in every situation.
Side-by-Side: Which Should You Choose?
• Best for longer stated total playback → JBL Tour Pro+ TWS. It lists up to 32 hours, compared with up to 22 hours for Sony.
• Best for switching between two devices → Sony WF-C510. Its multipoint connection supports two Bluetooth devices at once.
• Best for wireless charging → JBL Tour Pro+ TWS. The case supports Qi-compatible wireless charging; Sony’s listed details do not specify wireless charging.
• Best for simple physical controls → Sony WF-C510. It uses push-button controls, while JBL emphasizes voice control and app-accessible settings.
• Best for ambient listening options → JBL Tour Pro+ TWS if you want adjustable noise management; Sony WF-C510 if you want Ambient Sound Mode without listed ANC. Both offer a way to bring in more environmental sound, but their stated feature sets differ.
• Best for calls in distracting conditions → JBL Tour Pro+ TWS. Its three microphones are described as supporting voice clarity and reducing wind and other distractions.
• Best fit for someone seeking open-ear headphones for hunting → neither. Both are in-ear earbuds. The JBL’s Smart Ambient and Sony’s Ambient Sound Mode do not change their physical design or establish hearing protection.
For a shopper searching for the best waterproof open ear earbuds for hunting, these two are not a direct match. Sony lists an IPX4 rating, but it remains an in-ear product, not an open-ear model. The JBL sheet does not list an IP rating, so I would not assume water resistance from the information here. If weather exposure is central to your decision, verify the protection level you need rather than treating either model as a substitute for dedicated hearing protection.
The phrase “touch control headphone for hunting” also needs a closer look in this comparison. The Sony uses push buttons, not touch controls. JBL’s sheet describes voice control and app-based access to features, including Smart Ambient, but does not specify touch controls. For a hands-free adjustment, JBL’s voice-assistant support may be useful; for a tactile control method, Sony’s button operation is the clearer match.
My Verdict
That is a choice about listening features, not a claim that it is hearing protection or an open-ear design.
I’d choose the Sony WF-C510 instead for multipoint, physical buttons, and a compact everyday pair without noise cancelling.
FAQ
Neither is an open-ear model, and neither is identified as hearing protection. JBL offers Adaptive Noise Cancelling and Smart Ambient; Sony offers Ambient Sound Mode but lists no noise control. Consider whether you need environmental awareness, and use appropriate hearing protection where required.
JBL lists up to 32 hours of total music playback, while Sony lists up to 22 hours: 11 hours from the earbuds plus another 11 from the case. Actual use can vary, and the figures describe maximum stated playback.
Sony is the clearer choice for both: it lists Multipoint Connection for two Bluetooth devices and push-button controls. JBL’s listed strengths are voice-assistant support, its app, and adjustable ambient and noise-cancelling features.
• Audiovance Vibes 202 vs Sudio V3: Wired in Ear Earbuds
• Sony WH-CH720NL vs Qozybuds Gel Cushions Ear: Wireless Noise
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.