If you want secure, waterproof earbuds for workouts and a library trip where you prefer an in-ear fit, choose Jaybird Tarah; if you need longer battery life and a cushioned headband for library listening, choose AUNMAS Retro Over Ear. For the library, my preference is AUNMAS: its stated 20-hour playtime and over-ear design make it the more natural fit for long stretches, while Tarah is the more practical pick for sweat, rain, and exercise.
• Jaybird Tarah: Its strongest points are IPX7 sweat and water protection, a secure silicone ear-gel fit, and customizable EQ. Its main trade-off is six hours of playtime per charge.
• AUNMAS Retro Over Ear: Its main strengths are up to 20 hours of playtime, a lightweight 182 g design, and a curved adjustable headband. It does not list the same waterproof protection or custom EQ features as Tarah.
• Choose Jaybird Tarah if you want in-ear headphones for running, gym sessions, or workouts where a secure fit and water protection matter.
• Choose AUNMAS Retro Over Ear if you want cushioned, adjustable headphones for extended listening at home, during travel, or in a library.
• For a microphone and calls, Tarah explicitly lists an integrated microphone and on-cable controls. The AUNMAS details provided do not specify a microphone.
• For connection flexibility, AUNMAS supports two connected devices at once; Tarah offers Bluetooth and app-based sound customization.
Jaybird Tarah is built around a sporty in-ear design. Its flexible silicone ear gels are intended to sit securely, and the product includes three interchangeable pairs to help adjust the fit. That makes it a sensible option if you want earbuds that stay in place during a run or gym session rather than a headband that shifts as you move.
Its clearest practical advantage is IPX7 sweat and water protection. The stated protection makes Tarah better suited to sweaty workouts and running in wet weather than a headphone with no listed water-resistance rating. It also has an integrated microphone, so you can manage calls as well as music without taking the headphones off. The on-cable controls handle calls and music, and the Jaybird app lets you adjust the EQ to your taste.
The battery is rated for six hours of wireless playtime per charge. A 10-minute fast charge is stated to provide an hour of listening, which could help when you have forgotten to recharge before heading out. For library use, that may be enough for a study session, but it leaves less room for a long day of listening than AUNMAS’s stated 20 hours. Tarah’s in-ear form also will not suit someone who prefers padded ear cups or dislikes silicone ear gels.
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Updated: 2026-10-24 · 7 min read · Independent comparison
Who should skip it: Skip Tarah if your main priority is long battery life or you want a cushioned headband rather than earbuds.
AUNMAS Retro Over Ear: Who It's For
AUNMAS Retro Over Ear takes a different approach: a lightweight, 182 g design with a curved metal headband, soft sponge cushions, and an adjustable fit. The headband extends, while the ear cups adjust by six degrees. Those details are aimed at adapting to different head shapes and ear angles, which may be useful when you plan to wear headphones for a while instead of taking them on and off between short tasks.
Its stated playtime is up to 20 hours, notably longer than Tarah’s six hours. That makes AUNMAS the more convenient choice on paper for a full day split between reading, desk work, and travel, with fewer charging interruptions. The listed wireless range is up to 10 meters, and it can connect to two devices at the same time. If you move between a phone and another device, that dual connection may be useful without having to treat every switch as a fresh pairing task.
Who should skip it: Skip AUNMAS if you need stated waterproof protection for workouts or require a specified microphone for calls.
• Best for longer listening between charges → AUNMAS Retro Over Ear. It lists up to 20 hours of playtime, compared with Tarah’s six hours.
• Best for sweaty workouts or running in wet weather → Jaybird Tarah. Its IPX7 protection is specifically stated; AUNMAS has no water-resistance rating in the provided details.
• Best for an adjustable headband and cushioned ear cups → AUNMAS Retro Over Ear. Its curved metal headband extends, and its ear cups adjust by six degrees.
• Best for a secure in-ear sport fit → Jaybird Tarah. It includes interchangeable silicone ear gels designed to keep the earbuds in place.
• Best for adjusting the sound through an app → Jaybird Tarah. Its EQ can be customized in the Jaybird app; no comparable app-based adjustment is listed for AUNMAS.
• Best for connecting two devices simultaneously → AUNMAS Retro Over Ear. That feature is explicitly listed, while Tarah’s details describe Bluetooth connectivity without dual-device support.
• Best for a specified microphone and call controls → Jaybird Tarah. It lists an integrated microphone and controls for calls and music; AUNMAS’s supplied specifications do not identify a microphone.
• Best for staying aware of some surroundings → AUNMAS Retro Over Ear. Its sound description mentions ambient awareness. Neither product’s data specifies active noise cancellation.
Buying Considerations
For a library, first think about how you want headphones to sit. Tarah uses silicone ear gels inside the ear; AUNMAS has a headband and soft sponge cushions. That is a meaningful comfort difference, not just a style choice. If in-ear earbuds become uncomfortable for you during longer sessions, the AUNMAS design is the more relevant one to consider. If you prefer a compact sport fit, Tarah’s secure-fit approach makes more sense.
Calls are another practical divider. Tarah explicitly includes a microphone and call controls, which makes it the safer choice if you expect to answer calls while listening. The AUNMAS information provided does not confirm a microphone. If that feature is essential, check the product details carefully before choosing it rather than assuming that wireless headphones include call support.
Finally, consider what you will do between library sessions. Tarah’s water protection and sport fit give it a clear role outside the study room, especially for running and gym use. AUNMAS prioritizes longer stated playtime, an adjustable headband, and two-device connectivity. The better match is the one whose trade-offs fit your routine—not simply the one with the longer feature list. If price matters to your decision, check the current price on Amazon using the page’s button; I’m not comparing prices here.
In my opinion, I would choose AUNMAS Retro Over Ear for a library-first routine. Its stated 20-hour playtime, lightweight build, adjustable headband, and soft cushions fit extended listening better than Tarah’s sport-focused in-ear design.
I would choose Jaybird Tarah instead if workouts, rain protection, or an integrated microphone matter more than long sessions between charges.
For library use specifically, AUNMAS is my pick—but not because the provided details promise noise cancellation or guaranteed comfort for every listener.
For longer listening and a headband design, AUNMAS is the closer fit: it lists up to 20 hours of playtime, soft cushions, and an adjustable headband. Tarah may suit you better if you prefer in-ear earbuds or also want headphones for workouts.
Does either product have noise cancellation?
Jaybird Tarah lists an integrated microphone and on-cable call controls. AUNMAS’s provided specifications do not state that it has a microphone, so confirm that feature if calls are important to you.
Tarah is the clearer choice for exercise because it lists IPX7 sweat and water protection and silicone ear gels designed for a secure sport fit. AUNMAS has a lightweight headband design, but the provided details do not specify water resistance.
• beyerdynamic DT 880 vs Audio-Technica ATH-M20x
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.