Monday, 7 August – Matenadaran, Small Conference Hall
11:00–11:30 Welcome and introduction
11:30–13:30 Armenian Type-Makers and Transcultural Typography
Casting Persianate Elegance: Boğos Arabyan, Ohannes Mühendisyan, and Istanbul’s Nasta‘liq Types
Borna Izadpanah – University of Reading
This paper argues that the emergence of a distinctly Persianate print culture in nineteenth-century Istanbul depended not only on Ottoman calligraphic authority but also on the technical expertise of Ottoman-Armenian printers and typefounders. Focusing on the work of Boğos Arabyan and Ohannes Mühendisyan, it examines the transformation of Nasta‘liq, the pre-eminent Persianate manuscript hand, from its written form into movable type. Arabyan’s experimental Nasta‘liq type of the 1810s constituted the first sustained effort to render the script typographically in the Ottoman empire, establishing a crucial foundation for later developments. Building on this precedent, Mühendisyan’s later 18- and 24-point Nasta‘liq types of the 1840s, developed from the calligraphic models of leading Ottoman masters, transformed this experiment into a mature typographic system. Collectively, these innovations redefined Nasta‘liq as a printable form of Persianate visual authority and established new standards for the printing of poetry, literature, and learned texts in the Ottoman capital.Revisiting Tradition: Yovhannes Miwhêntisean and the Search for New Armenian Letterforms
Elena Papassissa – Oxford Brookes University
The development of Armenian typefaces reflects a history shaped by displacement, cultural resilience, and adaptation. Long before Armenia’s independence in 1991, the Armenian script was safeguarded largely through the efforts of Armenian diasporic communities, which played a crucial role not only in preserving its typographic heritage but also in its modernisation. Alterations to the forms of Bolorgir in the mid-nineteenth century symbolised a desire to convey modernity, assert cultural identity, and express national independence, while also seeking to improve the efficiency and affordability of printing and type production. A pivotal moment in this process occurred in 1847, when Armenian punch-cutter, printer, and publisher Yovhannes Miwhêntisean (1810–1891) published an announcement in Constantinople in the Armenian language, entitled Announcement upon the subject of newly fashioned typefaces, introducing significant innovations in Armenian typographic forms. This talk examines his contribution, situating it within a wider network of Armenian printers, publishers and intellectuals.Shaping Ottoman Print Culture: Armenian Type-Makers and the Formation of Ottoman Naskh Typography
Onur Yazıcıgil – Sabancı University
This paper examines the pivotal role of nineteenth-century Armenian type-makers in the formation of Ottoman Naskh typography and its transition from manuscript to print. By tracing the design, production, and circulation of Naskh types, it argues that Armenian type-makers—drawing on the manuscript models of Ottoman calligraphers—established the typographic forms that came to dominate Ottoman printing and subsequently influenced typographic practices well beyond the empire’s borders. The talk also explores the commercial and technological dimensions of their work, including the economic strategies that sustained their foundries and the ways they navigated issues of copyright and intellectual ownership. Finally, it considers how the expertise accumulated by Armenian craftsmen laid the foundations for the emergence of Turkish type-makers, who gradually entered the profession and contributed to the continued development of Ottoman typography.13:30–14:30 Lunch
14:30–16:30 Ottoman-Armenian Encounters in Print and Image
Artist and Illustrator: Recovering the Forgotten Late Ottoman Graphic Arts of Stepan Agayian
Vazken Khatchig Davidian – University of Oxford
This presentation marks a preliminary exploratory foray towards recovering the overlooked oeuvre of a forgotten artist of late Ottoman Constantinople, the miniaturist and illustrator, Stepan Agayian (Ստեփան Ակայեան, 1867–1937). Intended as a corrective to the hitherto scant attention given to the arts of late Ottoman graphic design in Armenian and Turkish art historiographies, the paper seeks to, firstly, assemble the work of one of its most acclaimed practitioners, Agayian, into an archive of fragments recovered mainly from the covers and pages of the multilingual late Ottoman press; and, secondly, to critically engage with a selection of these traces, dating from the period when the artist’s work had its highest circulation and visibility—between 1908 to the Armenian genocide in 1915—, with a focus on the much-lauded covers produced for the Teotigs’ (the husband-and-wife team of Teotoros Labdjindjian (1873–1929) and Arshagouhi, née Djezvedjian (1875–1922)) popular Ամէնուն տարեցոյցը (Everyone’s Almanac) and the influential Ottoman Turkish-language journal, Resimli Kitab (Illustrated Book).On the Politics of Reading and Writing in Armeno-Turkish Texts
Murat Cankara – Ankara Social Sciences University
For members of the Armenian community in the Ottoman Empire, the choice to read, write, and publish in Turkish using Armenian script was both a practical tool and a subject of debate. The last three decades have witnessed a considerable flourishing in scholarship on these texts. Today, we know that engagement with Armeno-Turkish was not a marginal activity limited to those whose primary language was not Armenian. On the contrary, it offered a vibrant platform—even for non-Armenians—and made significant contributions to building a transcommunal readership across the Ottoman Empire.My aim in this presentation is to cast a panoramic view over reading, writing, and publishing practices as they were represented in the Armeno-Turkish texts I have edited and analyzed over the last twenty years. Drawing on various genres produced predominantly throughout the second half of the nineteenth century—including fiction, drama, and periodical articles—I will highlight the complexities of Armeno-Turkish print culture, emphasize the negotiations it entailed, and unpack some of the debates surrounding it.Ottoman-Armenian Encounters with the Lithographic Press
Erin Piñon – Kunsthistorisches Institut in Florenz - Max-Planck-Institut
No one batted an eye when, in the middle of the nineteenth-century, Ottoman-Armenian printer-publisher-typographer Hovhannes Muyhendisyan issued three consecutive titles, furnished with images prepared by three different artists, using three different methods of printing. This was par for the course in Istanbul’s highly competitive, collaborative, and commercialized Armenian-language print market. These images, however, reflect the earliest encounters Armenian printers had with the lithographic press, the most cutting-edge method of reproducing images globally. They also mark a point of departure from how Ottoman-Armenian printed books looked in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries—filled with muddy impressions of worn and battered Dutch woodblocks that constituted the capital’s “stock” of available images.This paper discusses the role Muyhendisyan’s print enterprise played in shaping Armenian book arts in the nineteenth century and the permanent, global repercussions his titles set in motion. It offers the first sustained study of Armenian contributions to lithography (վիմագրութիւն), a field often overlooked or conflated with epigraphy in Armenian scholarship. By analyzing the origins, functions, and circulation of these images, the paper moves beyond questions of European influence to ask how Armenian visual culture developed through its own traditions and internal dialogues.