This blog post spotlights crime fiction written by authors of Asian heritage. We welcome community contributions and recommendations. Send your suggestions for future features to ICFABlogs@gmail.com, or submit your own blog post about crime fiction in your country or country of research! 

Viet Thanh Nguyen’s debut novel, The Sympathizer, became a hit, winning both the Pulitzer Prize for Fiction (Stanley 281) and the Edgar Award for Best First Novel (Huang 384). Rather than adhering strictly to a single genre, the novel combines classic crime and espionage fiction tropes with political satire, historical trauma and refugee narratives (Huang 384; Stanley 281). The novel follows a nameless protagonist who is a half-French, half-Vietnamese communist double agent serving as a captain in the South Vietnamese army (Huang 386; Liu 543). After the fall of Saigon in 1975, he fled to the United States with a South Vietnamese General to continue his undercover espionage work. The novel itself is structured as a retrospective confession, written by the nameless narrator-protagonist from an isolation cell in Vietnam after he is captured upon returning to his homeland (Liu 543-44). Through dark humor and brutal honesty, the narrator recounts his experiences with espionage, assassinations, and life as a displaced refugee.

The Evolution of the Detective into the “Double Agent”

In traditional American crime fiction, the classic detective, such as Sam Spade or Philip Marlowe, operates as a “free agent,” a white male investigator who is unbound by deep family ties or divided loyalties. This allows him to objectively pursue the truth (Huang 387). The Sympathizer develops this archetype into the Asian American double agent. The narrator introduces himself as “a spy, a sleeper, a spook, a man of two faces,” and “a man of two minds” (Nguyen ch. 1). His existence is defined by his conflicting loyalties. For instance, he shares a blood oath with two childhood friends who are on opposite ends of the political spectrum: Man, his communist handler, and Bon, a fierce South Vietnamese nationalist (Liu 544; Nguyen ch. 1, 2 and 14). Due to his “double agency,” the protagonist can never be an objective and detached sleuth; his very identity forces him to actively play different roles for different masters (Huang 387).

The Reversal of Confession and “Puristic” Testimony

Crime narratives often use witness testimony or confessions to reveal an objective truth (Stacy 226). Hirsekorn and Vice argue that conventional narratives often presume testimony comes from a morally pure, innocent victim (qtd. in Stacy 226). However, Nguyen subverts these testimonial models by presenting the entire novel as a coerced confession written under duress (Stacy 231). The narrator is forced to write for a Communist commandant who is not interested in messy truths. Rather than revealing absolute truth, those in power manipulate testimony to construct narratives that justify their ideologies (Nguyen ch. 19). As the commandant points out, every other prisoner readily recites rote formulas, confessing to being a “puppet soldier” or “brainwashed stooge” and “only telling what he wants [to hear]” (Nguyen ch. 19). Irritated that the narrator refuses to conform to these stock scripts, the commandant constantly uses his blue pencil to censor the draft, treating the narrator’s exposure to Western ideas as an ideological contamination requiring a political “cure” (Nguyen ch. 19). The narrator realizes that the easiest way to gain release is simply to regurgitate empty revolutionary slogans such as “Long live the Party and the State. Follow Ho Chi Minh’s glorious example. Let’s build a beautiful and perfect society!” (Nguyen ch. 19).

The Collapse of the Victim / Perpetrator Binary

The Sympathizer collapses crime fiction’s traditional Manichean division between guilty perpetrators and innocent victims (Stacy 226). The narrator admits that his primary weakness is sympathizing with his enemies, blurring the lines between “us” and “them” (Nguyen ch. 3). Throughout the novel, he simultaneously exists as both a victim and a victimizer (Liu 544-45). He is a victim of racism, displacement, and brutal torture, yet is also an active perpetrator of violence (Nguyen ch. 4, 6 and 15). To protect his undercover identity, he orchestrates the assassination of a “Crapulent Major” and personally shoots a journalist named Sonny (Nguyen ch. 6 and 16). His complicity is most hauntingly revealed through his passive spectatorship of the horrific torture and rape of a female communist agent, a moment in which “doing nothing” becomes a profound moral failure (Nguyen ch. 20-22).

Expanding Trauma from an “Event-Based” Perspective

Traditional trauma models in crime and war fiction primarily focus on post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), which is triggered by a single violent event such as combat. The Sympathizer broadens this framework by examining insidious trauma, which is the chronic, slow-burning psychological damage caused by structural violence, everyday racism, and alienation (Shrivastava et al. 2). For the narrator, this trauma begins at birth. As an illegitimate mixed-race child, he is labeled a “bastard,” which inflicts deep, continuous psychological wounds and isolates him from society (Nguyen ch. 1 and 17). This ongoing, insidious trauma, combined with the horrors of war, deeply fractures his mind (Shrivastava et al. 11). He experiences severe psychological distress, including vivid hallucinations in which the ghosts of men he murdered sit beside him and converse with him (Nguyen ch. 20-21). The intense stress eventually forces his mind to repress his darkest memories, such as his complicity in the rape of his comrade, as a survival mechanism. This leaves him mentally trapped between his dual identities (Shrivastava et al. 12-13; Stanley 292-93).

The Sympathizer was adapted into a seven-part miniseries that debuted in 2024 on HBO. It was directed by Park Chan-wook and starred Hoa Xuande, Robert Downey Jr., and Sandra Oh (Kang). Whether experienced on the page or on the screen, Nguyen’s work provides an engaging and multifaceted entry point into the evolving landscape of Asian diasporic crime narratives (Liu 546, 548). If you have thoughts on the novel, its screen adaptation, or other works exploring similar themes, please leave a comment or email us at ICFABlogs@gmail.com.

Works Cited

Figueroa, Sonny. Photograph in “Review: The Sympathizer, a Novel About a Soldier, Spy and Film Consultant,” by Sarah Lyall. The New York Times, 27 Aug. 2015, https://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/28/books/review-the-sympathizer-a-novel-about-a-soldier-spy-and-film-consultant.html.

Huang, Yunte. “The Lasting Lure of the Asian Mystery.” PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, vol. 133, no. 2, 2018, pp. 384–87.

Kang, Inkoo. “The Sympathizer Has an Identity Crisis.” The New Yorker, 19 Apr. 2024, https://www.newyorker.com/culture/on-television/the-sympathizer-has-an-identity-crisis.

Liu, Yu-yen. “Gesturing beyond the Frames: Post-Apocalyptic Sentiments in Viet Thanh Nguyen’s The Sympathizer.” Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, vol. 20, no. 4, 2019, pp. 541–51, doi:10.1080/14649373.2019.1685745.

Nguyen, Thanh V. The Sympathizer. Grove Press, 2015.

Shrivastava, Rashi, Avishek Parui, and Merin Simi Raj. “Memory, Insidious Trauma, and Refugee Crisis in Viet Thanh Nguyen’s The Sympathizer (2015).” Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, vol. 15, no. 3, 2023, pp. 1–17 doi:10.21659/rupkatha.v15n3.30.

Stacy, Ivan. “Testimony and Impure Subjects: Viet Thanh Nguyen’s The Sympathizer.” Journal of Perpetrator Research, vol. 7, no. 2, 2025, pp. 225–49, doi:10.21039/jpr.7.2.155.

Stanley, Sandra Kumamoto. “Citizens of the Imagination: Refugee Memory in Viet Thanh Nguyen’s The Sympathizer and Nothing Ever Dies: Vietnam and the Memory of War.” Modern Fiction Studies, vol. 66, no. 2, 2020, pp. 281–300. JSTOR, https://www.jstor.org/stable/27363283.