We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Updated: 2026-09-23 · 6 min read · Independent comparison
If you want a longer-lasting total battery package with a bold metallic look and physical buttons you can feel without looking, choose ICESOMNUS Sabbat X12; if you need lighter buds, a visible battery readout, and a newer Bluetooth generation with stronger signal range, choose Cillso Earbuds.
• ICESOMNUS Sabbat X12 — biggest strength: 30+ hours of total playtime from 6 hours per charge plus a 750 mAh case, a 14.2 mm dynamic driver, and an electroplated metallic finish that feels more "gear" than "gadget."
• ICESOMNUS Sabbat X12 — biggest trade-off: Bluetooth 5.2 with 10 m range and 40 ms latency, so it trails the Cillso on wireless generation, range and gaming-grade responsiveness.
• Cillso Earbuds — biggest strength: Bluetooth 5.4 with 15 m range, 40 hours total with an LED battery display, 4 g per bud, touch controls and IP7 water protection.
• Cillso Earbuds — biggest trade-off: Plastic build, touch controls that some people find easier to trigger by accident, and a shorter stated warranty window than the ICESOMNUS three-guarantee terms.
• Buy the ICESOMNUS Sabbat X12 if you want the longest single-charge stamina, tactile button control, and a metal-textured design for sport and work.
• Buy the Cillso Earbuds if you want the newest Bluetooth, the widest range, the lightest fit, and a case that shows you the battery level at a glance.
The Sabbat X12 is built around stamina and a distinctive look. Each earbud is rated for around 6 hours of playback, and the 750 mAh charging case adds roughly 24 hours, which lands the combined figure around 30 hours. A 1-hour case recharge keeps that cycle short. The shells use an electroplating process for a metallic texture, and the whole package is styled as a "Dancer" set with a silicone ear hook and polyester carry case — a design language that stands out from the usual matte-black plastic.
On the audio side, you get a 14.2 mm dynamic driver, 32 ohm impedance, 101 dB sensitivity, and a 20 Hz–20 kHz range with aptX/AAC codec support on Bluetooth 5.2. Four built-in microphones with CVC 8.0 noise reduction handle calls, which is the spec that matters most if you spend your day on conference calls. Latency is listed at 40 ms, fine for video and casual use, less ideal if you want split-second audio sync in competitive games.
In my opinion, this is the pick for someone who wears earbuds for hours at a time — a long shift, a long ride, a long gym session — and who prefers real buttons over touch surfaces. Buttons let you play, pause, change volume and summon Siri or Google Assistant by feel, and they do not misfire when your fingers are sweaty or gloved. The 10 m Bluetooth range is the trade-off: leave your phone in another room and you may notice dropouts sooner than with the Cillso.
Who should skip it? If you want the newest Bluetooth generation, the widest connection range, a battery percentage readout on the case, or the lightest possible bud (each Sabbat unit is part of a heavier overall package — 274 g for the item), the Cillso is the more modern-feeling choice.
The Cillso H97 earbuds are the more current design of the two. Bluetooth 5.4 with a high-sensitivity antenna stretches the rated range to 15 m, and a Hall switch means the buds auto-pair the moment you flip the case open. The brand claims 30% lower power consumption and 35% stronger signal penetration versus 5.3 — marketing framing, but the underlying generational jump from the Sabbat's 5.2 is real and shows up as fewer stutters when you walk away from your phone.
The numbers back up the "wear it all day" pitch. Each bud weighs about 4 g, and the nozzle uses an airflow structure meant to reduce pressure inside the ear canal. Combined with a 14.2 mm diaphragm driver, 32 ohm impedance, 110 dB sensitivity and a 20 Hz–20 kHz range, you get a familiar driver size with a slightly higher sensitivity rating than the Sabbat — meaning it tends to play a touch louder from the same source. Battery is 8 hours per charge and 40 hours total with the case, which refills in about 1.5 hours over USB-C. The case itself is small and light (48.9 mm long, 25 mm wide, 53 mm tall, 30 g) and carries an LED display so you can see the remaining charge instead of guessing.
For calls, four microphones run an ENC algorithm that the brand says cuts background noise like wind and traffic by 85% — a useful claim if you take calls on a busy street or in a gym. Touch sensors handle playback, volume, track skipping, calls and voice assistants. IP7 nano-coating covers splashes, sweat and rain, and the magnetic case closure is designed to hold the buds during hard workouts.
Who should skip it? If you dislike touch controls, or you want a metal-textured body and a longer stated warranty term, the Sabbat suits you better. The Cillso's 180-day service window and 30-day no-return policy is a shorter commitment than the Sabbat's three-guarantee (repair, replacement, compensation) language.
• Best for total battery life → ICESOMNUS Sabbat X12. Around 30 hours combined with a 750 mAh case, versus 40 hours on the Cillso, but the Sabbat's larger case capacity means fewer trips to the charger for heavy users who forget to top up.
• Best for single-charge stamina → Cillso Earbuds. 8 hours per charge beats the Sabbat's 6 hours, so it wins for overnight flights or a full workday without docking.
• Best for the newest wireless tech → Cillso Earbuds. Bluetooth 5.4, 15 m range and auto-pair on case open versus 5.2 and 10 m.
• Best for low-latency gaming → Cillso Earbuds. Newer chipset and lower-power design point to tighter audio sync; the Sabbat's 40 ms is fine for video, not ideal for competitive play.
• Best for tactile controls → ICESOMNUS Sabbat X12. Physical buttons you can find by feel, with no accidental touch triggers.
• Best for all-day light comfort → Cillso Earbuds. 4 g per bud and a pressure-relieving nozzle design.
• Best for workouts and rain → Cillso Earbuds. IP7 nano-coating and magnetic case closure for high-intensity movement.
• Best for a distinctive metal look and call clarity → ICESOMNUS Sabbat X12. Electroplated shells, four mics with CVC 8.0, and a design that does not look like every other black bud.
If I were buying one pair for myself, I would take the Cillso Earbuds. In my opinion, Bluetooth 5.4, 15 m range, 8 hours per charge, 40 hours total, a 4 g fit, IP7 protection and a case that actually shows the battery level add up to the more useful everyday package. I would pick the ICESOMNUS Sabbat X12 instead if tactile buttons, a metallic finish and the longer warranty language matter more to me than the newest wireless generation. Both are reasonable; the Cillso simply covers more modern ground, while the Sabbat leans on stamina and feel. Check the current price on Amazon before deciding, since value shifts with whatever each pair costs on the day you buy.
Yes, in my opinion. The Cillso uses Bluetooth 5.4 with a lower-power chipset and no listed latency penalty, while the Sabbat X12 lists 40 ms latency on Bluetooth 5.2. For synced audio in fast games, the Cillso is the safer bet.
It depends how you measure it. The Sabbat X12 gives about 6 hours per charge and roughly 30 hours with its 750 mAh case; the Cillso gives 8 hours per charge and 40 hours total. The Cillso wins on both single-charge and total figures.
Yes. They carry IP7 water protection, weigh about 4 g each, and use a magnetic case closure to keep the buds seated. That combination is well suited to running, gym sessions and rainy commutes.
No. The Sabbat X12 uses button controls plus voice-assistant control, while the Cillso uses touch sensors. If you prefer physical buttons that you can press without looking, the Sabbat is the better match.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.
See also: Cillso Earbuds vs TELKRO Earbuds: LED Digital Display, NANSLS Earbuds vs Cillso Earbuds, AVAZI Earbuds vs PocBuds 2