After one more extension of the penny sales tax to fund part of the Better Streets, Safer City program, Oklahoma City voters endorsed MAPS once again by approving MAPS 4 on Dec. 10, 2019. Learn more about MAPS 4 at okc.gov/maps4.
MAPS projects are built debt free, and over time the money is collected and spent efficiently, without burdening future taxpayers. For example, the MAPS for Kids sales tax, passed in 2001, took effect in 2002 and ended in 2008. Because of the time it takes to plan and build school buildings, not all of the projects were complete when the tax ended. The original MAPS projects were also completed a few years after the last tax funds were collected. Every MAPS initiative has essentially been a 10 to 12-year process, and the same is expected of MAPS 3.
How To Download Maps On Mtb Project
DOWNLOAD 🔥 https://tlniurl.com/2y3Iwc 🔥
The instructions say you should just be able to drag the map from one project to another, but when I try this the cursor shows no acceptable dropping point. When I use the copy/paste instructions and choose paste in the target project, nothing happens. (using Pro 2.0.0)
Thanks, yes I finally found that making a .mapx file was the only way to copy the map. I can't test drag-and-drop in Pro 2.1 because when I installed it, it crashed every time I tried to open a project, so I reverted back to the previous version.
Although Esri doesn't appear to state there are any limits to how many maps can be included in an ArcGIS Pro project, there are always practical limits to such functionality in any software application. So, I wanted to start a post to have folks discuss what they have found for the practical limits of maps within ArcGIS Pro projects.
For example, I recently had a project where importing MXDs for map service republication from Pro resulted in 150+ maps. Most of the maps are fairly simple in terms of number of layers and symbology. The APRX file is 7MB, which I consider fairly small and manageable.
There are some downsides I have run into with this number of maps. One is it does take noticeably longer than usual to open, but not having all of the maps open in the project can make the time-to-open manageable. There are also certain ArcPy functions that seem to take longer (like updateConnectionProperties) because they want to touch every map.
Yesterday I started a post that kind of touched on this. I have recently experienced trouble running Table to Excel in documents with large numbers of maps. As an example, I have one (Project A) with 57 maps. The Table to Excel tool just spins and spins. I made a blank aprx and steadily added maps from the original project and ran the tool, and when I hit map 16, the tool no longer worked. Then I opened a different project (47 maps) and tried to run the tool, and it completed successfully. Next step was to combine the two projects - I started a second blank aprx, added all of the maps from the 47 map project (Project B), then steadily added maps from Project A. The tool succeeded with all of the maps from Project B plus 10 from project A. Then I added 5 more from Project A, and the tool didn't work.
We currently do not have a feature that supports merging two maps together that were captured on different dates. Instead, the workaround will be to upload all the images together in one data set to produce a single map. Please keep in mind the quality of this type of map may decrease due to different overlap settings/lighting/shadows/flying conditions from the different days of data capture.
Missing Maps is being run through OpenStreetMap, which guarantees that the data collected and the maps that come from it are free, accessible and without restriction forever. Not only this, but the maps are live, meaning that anyone can add to, correct or develop them. Essentially, a Wikipedia of maps.
This guide shows how to set up your Google Cloud project before usingthe Google Maps Platform APIs. While you may have completed some of thesesteps in theGetting started with Google Maps Platform page,this topic provides additional, useful instructions for managing your projects.
After you create the project, you cannot change the project ID, so choose an ID that you'll be comfortable using for the lifetime of the project. Don't include any sensitive information in your project ID.
If you have never used the Google Cloud Console to create a billing account or a project, click the Get Started button that links to an interactive setup experience in the Cloud Console for new users:
Once you have created a billing account and project you are eligible for the Google CloudPlatform $300 no-charge trial and Google Maps Platform recurring $200 monthly credit. To learn more, seeBilling Account Credits.
To get started with a project map, you need to frame a question you want to ask of your project data. For example, how have these files been coded? Which cases are assigned to this classification? What are the attributes defined for this classification? Then, add the project items that are central to your question to the canvas to build up a visual representation of your enquiry. Add other, associated items to the canvas to help illustrate the answer.
View the interactive map to see if any currently funded projects are in progress in your community, or contact your local floodplain administrator (often an official in the zoning or planning department).
Since signing the law, the Biden-Harris Administration has hit the ground running to make major progress. Already at this early stage, over $390 billion has been announced and is headed to states, Tribes, territories and local governments with thousands of specific recipients and projects identified for funding. Thousands more recipients will be added in the coming months, as additional funding opportunities become grant awards and as formula funds direct states to become specific projects.
Metropolitan Area Projects Plan (MAPS) is a multi-year, municipal capital improvement program, consisting of a number of projects, originally conceived in the 1990s in Oklahoma City by its then mayor Ron Norick. A MAPS program features several interrelated and defined capital projects, funded by a temporary sales tax (allowing projects to be paid for in cash, without incurring debt), administered by a separate dedicated city staff funded by the sales tax, and supervised by a volunteer citizens oversight committee.
In some ways, a MAPS program is similar to a local option sales tax. However, taxes collected by a MAPS program do not go to a city's general fund, but are instead deposited into a trust dedicated to the specific projects identified in the taxes' enabling ordinance. Additionally, MAPS programs are only indirectly controlled by a city's elected governance body; a citizens oversight committee provides direct oversight, which is also established by the enabling ordinance.
The key features of the original program were designed to provide accountability to the citizens of the community as well as provide a funding mechanism for capital projects without using a city's general revenue funds, and included:
City residents were initially skeptical over funding the public projects through a sales tax increase, and as late as a month before the tax referendum opposed the plan by a 20% margin. However, the plan did pass by a slim margin in a vote in December, 1993.[5] During the five year tax period the city raised nearly $310 million in direct taxes, plus $52 million of income on the tax money it had deposited. The tax was extended with voter approval for an additional six months to raise enough money to complete all of the projects, and construction continued until 2004.
MAPS 3 is a $777 million program, approved by voters in 2009 with 54% of the vote (the same percentage as the Original MAPS.)[12] The one-cent sales tax initiative began in April 2010 and ends in December 2017. After a year of public meetings organized by Mayor Mick Cornett, there developed a consensus that a future MAPS program should focus on projects that improved the Quality of Life in Oklahoma City. Hundreds of citizens suggested projects to be considered; through a series of public meetings eight projects were eventually selected to be included in the MAPS 3 proposal.
Recognizing that the city's economy may fluctuate during the time of the sales tax collection, and that there may be unforeseen project contingencies, the program also has a significant Infrastructure/Contingency component.
The public forum process used to identify projects to be included in the MAPS 3 program established enough public political support to overcome an effort by a newly elected city council person who attempted to derail the original MAPS 3 proposal. An initiative petition was filed that would have eliminated the Convention Center and ended the Sales tax earlier. This council person also ran for Mayor, with MAPS being a major factor in the election. Mayor Cornett was re-elected for an unprecedented 4th term with 65.7% of the vote.[13]
These pesticide-use estimates are suitable for evaluating national and regional patterns and trends of annual pesticide use. The reliability of estimates, however, generally decreases with scale and these estimates and maps are not intended for detailed evaluations, such as comparing within or between specific individual counties.(More Details)
Approximately $1.8 billion in city investment has been used or earmarked for the three rounds of MAPS projects in Oklahoma City. Additional city infrastructure expenditures in the period totaled $690 million and worked to enhance the outcome of the MAPS projects. Other federal, state and local government entities invested an additional $600 million in the downtown area. Total public investment through city spending on MAPS and investments by other public sector entities reached $3.1 billion between 1995 and 2018.
Explore the maps by clicking on your state, congressional district, or county and compare the results across questions and with other geographic areas. Beneath each map are bar charts displaying the results for every question at whichever geographic scale is currently selected. Note that the congressional districts for North Carolina are based on the 2019 (116th Congress) district boundaries and so do not reflect the latest redistricting there. 2351a5e196