How To Download Articles From The Economist ((LINK))

Access to The Economist is available electronically through the ProQuest One Business (1992 - present; with pdf format - including charts and images - covering the past few years) and Gale Business Insights (full text coverage from 1988 - present; abstracts going back to 1965), however, that content is limited to HTML format (not pdf) which means charts and images may not be included.

Economist Historical Archive may also be accessed from the Boston Public Library through a BPL ecard and this resource provides a completely searchable copy of every issue of The Economist from 1843 to 2014. While Boston University also has access to many years of older content through microfilm, it is much easier to access it through the Economist Historical Archive.

How To Download Articles From The Economist

Download Zip 🔥 https://urlin.us/2y2RWn 🔥

Please note that you must be logged in to economist.com to access the full page. If you do not have access and cannot see this button, contact rights@economist.com and include the relevant content so that we can provide a link to RightsLink.

Permission can also be requested through Marketplace from the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC). Depending on the source of the requested content, please search for either The Economist or 1843 within the system to request permission.

Can I reuse a cover from The Economist?

Yes, but you must use this in its entirety (including logo and cover lines). Please contact rights@economist.com with the relevant cover to request a link to RightsLink. A fee is charged for this re-use.

Can I use content from The Economist in a School, University or further education institution?

Please check whether your institution has a licence to reuse content with the relevant Reproduction Rights Organisation (RRO) in your territory. If your intended use is not covered by a licence or statutory exception to copyright, you must submit a request for this use through RightsLink or Marketplace.

Can I use extracts of articles?

We license full articles and do not allow any editing or abridgement of our work. Please contact us at rights@economist.com if you have any questions about extract use.

How can I use a copy of The Economist as a prop or stage dressing in my TV or theatre production?

Please contact our PR team for this approval at hollydonahue@economist.com and tomamos@economist.com

Can I link to articles from The Economist?

Yes, you can link to articles on The Economist without clearing permission, but please bear in mind that articles will be behind a paywall and non-subscribers may not be able to view these in their entirety.

Reprints are customised reproductions of articles, either delivered digitally or printed on high-quality paper. Reprints can be used to share articles with your prospects at trade shows and conferences, showcase on your website or mail to your customers. All reprint orders placed are custom-handled by PARS International Corp. to your specifications and within publisher guidelines.

The Economist was founded by the British businessman and banker James Wilson in 1843, to advance the repeal of the Corn Laws, a system of import tariffs.[12] A prospectus for the newspaper from 5 August 1843 enumerated thirteen areas of coverage that its editors wanted the publication to focus on:[13].mw-parser-output .tmulti .multiimageinner{display:flex;flex-direction:column}.mw-parser-output .tmulti .trow{display:flex;flex-direction:row;clear:left;flex-wrap:wrap;width:100%;box-sizing:border-box}.mw-parser-output .tmulti .tsingle{margin:1px;float:left}.mw-parser-output .tmulti .theader{clear:both;font-weight:bold;text-align:center;align-self:center;background-color:transparent;width:100%}.mw-parser-output .tmulti .thumbcaption{background-color:transparent}.mw-parser-output .tmulti .text-align-left{text-align:left}.mw-parser-output .tmulti .text-align-right{text-align:right}.mw-parser-output .tmulti .text-align-center{text-align:center}@media all and (max-width:720px){.mw-parser-output .tmulti .thumbinner{width:100%!important;box-sizing:border-box;max-width:none!important;align-items:center}.mw-parser-output .tmulti .trow{justify-content:center}.mw-parser-output .tmulti .tsingle{float:none!important;max-width:100%!important;box-sizing:border-box;text-align:center}.mw-parser-output .tmulti .tsingle .thumbcaption{text-align:left}.mw-parser-output .tmulti .trow>.thumbcaption{text-align:center}}

Pearson plc held a 50% shareholding via The Financial Times Limited until August 2015. At that time, Pearson sold their share in the Economist. The Agnelli family's Exor paid 287m to raise their stake from 4.7% to 43.4% while the Economist paid 182m for the balance of 5.04m shares which will be distributed to current shareholders.[34] Aside from the Agnelli family, smaller shareholders in the company include Cadbury, Rothschild (21%), Schroder, Layton and other family interests as well as a number of staff and former staff shareholders.[34][39] A board of trustees formally appoints the editor, who cannot be removed without its permission. The Economist Newspaper Limited is a wholly owned subsidiary of The Economist Group. Sir Evelyn Robert de Rothschild was chairman of the company from 1972 to 1989.

The Economist has traditionally and historically persisted in referring to itself as a "newspaper",[2][51][52] rather than a "news magazine" due to its mostly cosmetic switch from broadsheet to perfect-binding format and its general focus on current affairs as opposed to specialist subjects.[1][53] It is legally classified as a newspaper in Britain and the United States.[54][55][56] Most databases and anthologies catalogue the weekly as a newspaper printed in magazine- or journal-format.[57] The Economist differentiates and contrasts itself as a newspaper against their sister lifestyle magazine, 1843, which does the same in turn. Editor Zanny Minton Bedoes clarified the distinction in 2016: "we call it a newspaper because it was founded in 1843, 173 years ago, [when] all [perfect-bound publications] were called newspapers."[58]

The Economist's articles often take a definite editorial stance and almost never carry a byline.[59] Not even the name of the editor is printed in the issue. It is a long-standing tradition that an editor's only signed article during their tenure is written on the occasion of their departure from the position. The author of a piece is named in certain circumstances: when notable persons are invited to contribute opinion pieces; when journalists of The Economist compile special reports (previously known as surveys); for the Year in Review special edition; and to highlight a potential conflict of interest over a book review. The names of The Economist editors and correspondents can be located on the media directory pages of the website.[60] Online blog pieces are signed with the initials of the writer and authors of print stories are allowed to note their authorship from their personal web sites.[61] "This approach is not without its faults (we have four staff members with the initials 'J.P.', for example) but is the best compromise between total anonymity and full bylines, in our view", wrote one anonymous writer of The Economist.[62] According to one academic study, the anonymous ethos of the weekly has contributed to strengthening three areas for The Economist: collective and consistent voice, talent and newsroom management, and brand strength.[63]

The editors say this is necessary because "collective voice and personality matter more than the identities of individual journalists"[64] and reflects "a collaborative effort".[65] In most articles, authors refer to themselves as "your correspondent" or "this reviewer". The writers of the titled opinion columns tend to refer to themselves by the title (hence, a sentence in the "Lexington" column might read "Lexington was informed...").

American author and long-time reader Michael Lewis criticised the paper's editorial anonymity in 1991, labelling it a means to hide the youth and inexperience of those writing articles.[24] Although individual articles are written anonymously, there is no secrecy over who the writers are, as they are listed on The Economist's website, which also provides summaries of their careers and academic qualifications.[66] Later, in 2009, Lewis included multiple Economist articles in his anthology about the 2008 financial crisis, Panic: The Story of Modern Financial Insanity.[67]

John Ralston Saul describes The Economist as a "...[newspaper] which hides the names of the journalists who write its articles in order to create the illusion that they dispense disinterested truth rather than opinion. This sales technique, reminiscent of pre-Reformation Catholicism, is not surprising in a publication named after the social science most given to wild guesses and imaginary facts presented in the guise of inevitability and exactitude. That it is the Bible of the corporate executive indicates to what extent received wisdom is the daily bread of a managerial civilization."[68]

The Economist frequently receives letters from its readership in response to the previous week's edition. While it is known to feature letters from senior businesspeople, politicians, ambassadors, and spokespeople, the paper includes letters from typical readers as well. Well-written or witty responses from anyone are considered, and controversial issues frequently produce a torrent of letters. For example, the survey of corporate social responsibility, published January 2005, produced largely critical letters from Oxfam, the World Food Programme, United Nations Global Compact, the Chairman of BT Group, an ex-Director of Shell and the UK Institute of Directors.[73] ff782bc1db