The world is taking a break from chatting with Siri, Google, and Alexa, and is currently hooking up with ChatGPT.  I took a break from the collegiate antics of the Hartford School Board, and asked ChatGPT to evaluate that legislative body, so called.

This is how it answered:

As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions or beliefs, nor do I have access to the latest information or data on the current performance of the Board of Education for Hartford Public Schools in Connecticut. However, there are various indicators that could help assess their performance, such as student achievement, graduation rates, equity and inclusion initiatives, and community engagement. I recommend conducting research on the latest developments and data on the Board of Education for Hartford Public Schools in Connecticut to gain a comprehensive understanding of their performance. It's also essential to keep in mind that a holistic evaluation of the Board of Education should include a consideration of the complexities of leading a school district and the challenges that they face in meeting the diverse needs of all students in the district.

I then asked, does the work of school boards effect student achievement?

Yes, the work of school boards can have a significant impact on student achievement. School boards play a critical role in setting policies and priorities for their districts, including decisions related to curriculum, instructional methods, teacher training, and resources allocation. They also oversee the hiring and evaluation of superintendents and other district leaders who are responsible for implementing these policies and ensuring that the district is meeting the needs of all students.

When school boards prioritize student achievement and focus on evidence-based practices and strategies, they can help improve educational outcomes for students. For example, school boards can allocate resources to support high-quality instruction, provide professional development opportunities for teachers, and implement data-driven strategies to monitor student progress and identify areas for improvement. Additionally, when school boards prioritize equity and inclusivity, they can help ensure that all students have access to the resources and support they need to succeed.

On the other hand, when school boards fail to prioritize student achievement or make decisions that are not evidence-based, it can have negative consequences for student learning and success. For example, school boards that do not invest in high-quality instructional materials or fail to provide adequate support for teachers can impact the quality of instruction and student learning. Similarly, school boards that do not prioritize equity and inclusivity may create barriers for certain students, leading to disparities in achievement.

Overall, the work of school boards can have a significant impact on student achievement, and it's important for school boards to prioritize evidence-based practices and focus on strategies that will improve outcomes for all students.

ChatGPT didn’t appear to be tiring, so I asked it another question. Do high school leaders often mislead the public with school data?  Here is C’s reply:

It would be inaccurate to make a blanket statement about whether high school leaders often mislead the public about their data. While there may be instances where school leaders intentionally misrepresent data to make their schools or districts appear more successful than they actually are, such instances are generally rare and would be considered unethical and unprofessional behavior.

That said, it's important to acknowledge that data can be complex and nuanced, and it can be challenging to present it in a clear and accessible way to the public. Additionally, different schools and districts may use different metrics or benchmarks to measure success, which can make comparisons across schools or districts difficult.

To promote transparency and accuracy in reporting data, schools and districts should have clear policies and procedures in place for collecting, analyzing, and reporting data. They should also be transparent about their methods for collecting and analyzing data and make data easily accessible to the public. Additionally, schools and districts should be willing to engage in dialogue with stakeholders to help clarify any misunderstandings or address any concerns about the data.

Overall, while there may be instances where high school leaders intentionally misrepresent data, these instances are generally rare. It's important for schools and districts to prioritize transparency and accuracy in reporting data to build trust and promote accountability with stakeholders.

I finished my conversation with ChatGPT by asking it for the name of that plastic piece at the end of a shoelace.

The plastic piece at the end of a shoelace is called an aglet.

ChatGPT belongs on the Hartford School Board.