This week under the gold dome, there were two meetings held to discuss how Connecticut funds school districts throughout the state. At a Budget Information Hearing and a Public Hearing, school stakeholders gathered to tell legislators that budgeting formulas which the state uses to send mierda carga de dinero to the school districts, do not account for the “needs” or the socioeconomic status of students.
Once that money is delivered to the districts by suitcase from a van parked in an alley somewhere, how equitable are the decisions made by district leaders in making that money available to each individual school in the district? Let’s take Hartford, for instance.
We’ve already seen in “Hartford Students Boiling Over School Lunches,” the inequity in Hartford’s use of the federal Farm to School Program, as only Pre-K to 8th graders have access to locally grown fresh produce, and only 22 of Hartford’s 47 schools (2018-2019) give access to the educational strategy portion of the program.
Similarly , in “Hartford Schools’ Attempt at Needs-Based Equity,” we set out to find the “needs” of two magnet schools in Hartford, which led the district to award them with an Esports Lab and a “Youth Talks!” forum, and not one of the high-needs public high schools. Other than the district’s need to attract suburban White students to the magnet schools, there was not a visible student need among these two schools showing that they should cut the line in front of one of the public high schools.
In the tables below, using data from HPS budget documents , Capital Prep Magnet school has ranked at the bottom of HPS’s per pupil funding the past two years, yet it ranks at the top of Hartford’s 38 schools in the percentage of Black students. In each of the past two years, 6 of the lowest funded schools in Hartford were among the top 10 schools in Black enrollment.
The tables below show that over the past two years, 9 schools that have ranked in the top 10 for the percentage of students on free and reduced lunches, have ranked outside the top 10 in terms of per pupil funding.
When it comes to English language learning students (ELL), Dwight Bellizzi Academy has ranked near the bottom of the HPS funding list over the past two years, but has been in the top 5 of all schools in the percentage of ELL students. Similarly, M.D. Fox Middle School has ranked 18th and 20th the past 2 years in funding, but 5th and 6th in the percentage of ELL students.
Over the past two years, 8 schools ranking outside the top 10 in funding, have ranked in the top 10 in the percentage of special education students enrolled. Pathways Academy has ranked 32nd and 22nd in the terms of per pupil funding over the past two years, but has ranked 9th and 3rd in the percentage of special education students among their student body.
As for academic need, the tables below show that in 2021-22, while Dwight Bellizzi and Capital Prep are languishing at the bottom of the funding rankings, they are also languishing as one of the top 10 lowest performing schools per the Smarter Balance Assessment (SBA) in English language arts and in math. Eleven of the lowest performers in each subject on the SBA are not in the top 10 when it comes to funding.
For high school academics, the tables below show that in 2021-22, only Hartford High is among the top 5 funded schools in the district, and still, it ranks as the 4th lowest performer on the SAT for English language arts. Five of the 7 failing schools, per the SAT in both ELL and math, are among the lowest funded high schools. Data is incomplete as provided by HPS.
The chart below shows that in most cases, the per pupil funding amount for each school in the Hartford school district, will increase as their enrollment number decreases. The average funding amount in Hartford schools is $15,407, and the average enrollment number is 435 students. Fifteen (15) schools are funded above the average, and 12 of them have an enrollment number which is below average. Twenty-three (23) schools are funded below average, but 11 of them are also below average in enrollment. However, this is what is wrong with current funding formulas. They rely on pure pupil numbers and do not consider socio-economic and academic need. Non-White school districts across the land of the free, receive $23 billion less than White districts, despite serving the same number of students.