GP Aggregator
Comparative study of Green Parties within the UK in comparison with the Labour Party and Your Party
Comparative study of Green Parties within the UK in comparison with the Labour Party and Your Party
2026 Green Conference & Internal Elections below.
Institutional data on structures, membership, rules, policy etc on Structures page. Archive of articles on Narratives/Archives page.
This website seeks to aggregate information on the Green Party for the purpose of comparing it with what happens in the Labour Party and Your Party. The aim is to explore the spread of over half a million people in Labour in 2015-2021, who may now be in 265,000 member Labour, 220,000 (or is it 228,000) member Greens and 42,000 member Your Party.
This website is thus connected for comparison purposes to Labour Dashboard and YP Aggregator to explore these comparative issues. The aim is to explore the Parties together as institutions.
As well as the "current news" section on this page (covering their conference below), on other pages it covers Party Structures and also has a page to act as an Archive of useful links and to explore Narratives.
The rise of the Greens from a party that had less than 14,000 members 12 years ago and only been once over 60,000 before 2025 to 220,000-228,000 today is the development of a large new institution so it seems important to understand such a large organisation more and the Structures Page goes into great detail over that.
It's interested to explore whether things that were were important to Labour members in political rows during 2015-19 are still as important to people now? Is what was advocated then a principle or was it merely a tactic in a conflict at the time? There may be more of these than some realise.
It's underlying assumption is those members shown in different parties above are quite possibly now far more "comfortable" in the Party they are now in rather than being in conflict in one single party they may have been in the past. In the Greens a very clear 85% Leader result (after Labour's much less decisive 62% in 2016) may have been a "signal" for many to sign up after past experiences and that hypothesis is explored on the Structures section of this website.
Also as I set out here how much do expressive v instrumentalist (my own version being "party as a platform" to express v "party as a gateway" to be inducted into, that I somewhat presciently defined in Feb 2015 during the previous "Green Surge" of membership in 2014/15) makes a difference to how people are motivated to see and do politics? This shows my interest in these comparative party issues goes back a decade and is not new. The issue was further explored as early as late 2015 by Peter Kellner and used very organisationally effectively, rightly or wrongly, as segementation to help Keir Starmer to win selection and I cover the detail of that from a Labour context on Labour Dashboard. In the last decade social media driven low institutionalised Hyperpolitics has seen those segments above together mix more within political party contexts and arguably break into conflict. Alan Lockey has set out some very useful points as to a failing of Starmerism is it did not continue the segmentation in government but more importantly that it is not going away. In many ways the fluctuations of Green membership since 2013 from 14,000 up to 63,000 ,down to 39,000, back up to50,000 and then 68,000 and now up to 220,000-228,000 is an incredibly useful trend metric indeed - see the 50+ years membership data on the Structures page - for the level of that platform/expressiveness and how well networked or even semi-institutionalised it gets?
The size of the Green membership means one can now explore all these issues institutionally with them too now. It should be made very clear that politics is naturally a mix of equally valid instrumentalist & expressive motivations (eg even the Labour Party recognises this with "Clause 1" AND "Clause IV" of its rules) but how well do political parties as structured institutions, historically operating more by gateway instrumentalism, work with this mix when social movements tend to be where a concentration on expressive platform politics has worked more easily? What happens if the "comfortability" hypothesis above suggests we now have a large party institution of over 200,000 made up of a much higher proportion of "ethically certain" "expressive" activists who in Kellner's original 2015 argument do not "motivationally need to "win" a general election and expressively "winning the argument" is equally important too them rather than perhaps a more secondary outcome for "what counts is what works/wins" instrumentalists? What are the implications for a party with those possible characterisitics and also for politics more widely?
This should not be seen as an issue of interest to just the Labour right (who have made use of the segmentation), centrists and soft left but is also being explored more by further Left commentators too here and here. On top of that left commentators have also flagged the issue of "virtue hoarding" where "ethical certainty" (a phrase I first used in Sept 2014 during the Green Member surge then just before Oliver Burkeman in Jan 2015 more widely flagged individualistic righteous problem solving) comes into conflict with other post-materialists who may hold more "ethical complexity" mindsets with its trade offs/Trolley Problems.
If I have any suggestion to political parties in general after watching Labour across its new narrative of a "2015-2026 Two antithesis Leaders period" and now looking at the Greens, is that political parties, whether more for the intrumentalist or the expressive, are pretty rubbish at "inducting" large numbers of new members in general into them as institutions. An examination of the Green Party training offer seems to focus more on experienced electoral campaigners than new members so the Greens may be going through the same issues Labour went through over member assimilation into party culture. This low institutionalisation is something that is becoming a more widely recognised issue for left commentators. To show what might be practically needed for any "induction" this website aims to explain the Greens as an institution through data and perhaps in places set out questions for self-reflection that even the most "ethically certain" might want to explore?
Disclaimer: This website is purely for comparative research and not associated with the Green Party in any way and any dates/deadlines mentioned should not be taken as correct and should be sourced directly.
Note: I normally hand search all my data, but as an experiment, I did use AI to gather some material for 3 small pieces of summarising text in a few sections and I do specify where it is used. However I am carefully checking all links and material and substantially re-editing the text often deleting extraneous or duplicated material.
Internal Elections
Past Elections are on the Structures page.
The elections listed below were elected at Autumn Conference by members attending
2026 Results
Notes:
The elections listed below were elected at Autumn Conference by members attending
A susprisingly low turnout by conference attendees voting for committees (797 and 24% was top turnout at a conference that had over 1,835 voting on the G4P motion - see below)
A comparison below of how well G4P slate did (Committees contested marked in bold) in terms of how many of its slate were elected and its % vote
Important to note those listed on the G4P slate were standing for election and G4P werre listing their endorsement so some people may not be members of G4P
Results:
Campaigns Committee: Turnout 17%. No G4P slate
Equalities & Diversity Committee: Turnout 20%. G4P 3 out of 5. 48%
Green World Editorial Board: Turnout 13%. No G4P slate
International Committee: Turnout 21%. G4P 3 out of 5. 45%
Trade Union Liaison Committee: Turnout 15%. No G4P slate
Disciplinary Committee: Turnout 19%. G4P 1 out of 1. 49%
Alternative Disputes Resolution Committee: Turnout 21%. G4P 1 out of 2. 76%
Conferences Committee: Turnout 20%. G4P 2 out of 4. 65%
Standing Orders Committee: Turnout 24%. G4P 3 out of 5. 47%
For Autumn 2026 Conference - see below
To understand the Structure, Rules and Policy Making Process of the Green Party go the Structures page
Green Party Spring Conference
Attendance: Most attending will be members with a right to vote as the Conference is non-delegate.
Comparison Events in terms of Total Attendance: See Autumn Conference for comparisons of conferences in main Autumn season of Party Conferences
Note: Most of the current links below relate to 2026 Conference and will be updated as new ones are listed
More information will be added here as the Conference receives more coverage along with any useful or comparative commentary.
Core information
Online Conference
Note: Leadership speeches at the Autumn Conference are all they have livestreamed in 2025 and 2026.
The Green Party is now the only one of the 5 main parties not to livestream its plenary sessions.
Conference Agenda
Timetable overview Also a Pdf here and a slightly earlier draft here.
Conference Agenda Reports and Motions Pdf - only found after conference concluded
Motions
Green Party Conference Agenda - SOC Motions List may appear here
Conference Core Elements
Keynote Speeches from the Party Leader, Co-Deputies, and Wales Green Party Leader
Plenary Sessions: Debating and voting on major internal reports, constitutional amendments, and motions.
Internal Elections Hustings The elections themselves are conducted online as all member OMOV ballots - see more below.
Fringe Events
Factions and Special Interest Groups promoting Motions
Go to the Structures page for the list. Let us know if any more to add.
Rules Relevant to Conference
Interesting to note the Greens need 26 pages of standing order rules for their conference compared to just 3 pages for Labour anchored at it is by its Labour movement traditions from its TU Bloc vote & NEC powers
Issues/Organisations active at conference
Conference News Items and online coverage
This is a list of online news and commentary on news involving the Green Party in the run up to Green conference from a very wide range of viewpoints which is provided as published online just for information/context. Green Party official responses are available on the Structures page with links to their Media Releases and X feed.
Pre-Conference
To understand the Structure, Rules and Policy Making Process of the Green Party go the Structures page
Green Party Autumn Conference 2-4 October, Brighton
Attendance: Claiming 3000+ but just over 1,800 voted in the main Greens for Palestine debate (and over 400 of the votes were cast online) so perhaps closer to 2,000? Was until last year 1,000 to 1,500 members but is significantly expanding. Most attending will be members with a right to vote as the Conference is non-delegate.
Comparison Events in terms of Total Attendance: Labour 18,000, Conservatives 12,000, Reform 8,000, Liberal Democrats 3,500, Your Party 2,500, TUC 3,000 . Important to note these numbers includes a lot of visitors as well as voting delegates. For example Labour likely has 1,200 to 1,500 delegates representing 265,000 members and 1.5 million TU affiliates with the rest visitors and staff.
More information will be added here as the Conference receives more coverage along with any useful or comparative commentary.
Core information
Online Conference
Note: Leadership speeches are all they have livestreamed in 2025 and 2026.
The Green Party is now the only one of the 5 main parties not to livestream its plenary sessions.
Zack Polanski's Leader's Speech LIVE: Green Party Conference 2026
Conference Agenda
Timetable overview Also a Pdf here and a slightly earlier draft here.
Conference Agenda Reports and Motions Pdf - only found after conference concluded
Motions
Green Party Conference Agenda - SOC Motions List - 149 motions up for debate, but not all will be reached
Motions on the agenda - only found after conference concluded
Greens for Palestine Motion - this is likely to receive media coverage at this conference. Greens for Palestine have also produced a booklet explaining the motion here. Jewish Greens Survey is here.
This claimed figure currently suggests that the Greens for Palestine motion, as unamended, which along with the whole "Zionism is Racism" debate would also change Party policy from "1/2 state ambiguity" (2024 Manifesto) to "1 state" has at least 25% support from the 3,000 voting conference so far
Current senior people view on Greens for Palestine Motion as far as can be ascertained:
Support: Mothin Ali
Support but did not vote: Zoe Garbutt
Did not vote: Natalie Bennett MHoL, Hannah Spencer MP, Benali Hamdache AM
Want amended but did not vote: Zack Polanski AM
Oppose: Rachel Millward, Ellie Chowns MP, Sian Berry MP, Carla Denyer MP, Adrian Ramsay MP, Jenny Jones MHoL, Caroline Lucas, Anthony Slaughter MS
Unknown: Paul Rock MS
Current debate speculation is Motion will be passed with "safeguards amendment" and possibly one rejecting "1 state" and keeping to 2024 manifesto "1/2 state ambiguity"
Amendment 1: "1 state or "1/2 state ambiguity" - lost on show of hands - ballot vote (3) Faye Brown on X: "UPDATE: Amendment 1 has been officially voted down after the paper revote." / X and 1,700 voted lower than the 3,000 claimed to be attending: (1) Jane on X: "@charliemansell 1700 votes counted for the first amendment. I think that’s pretty high turnout" / X Amendment 1 Lost 821 to 920 Total vote cast 1,742: lee harpin on X: "Amendment 1 didn’t pass https://t.co/lsTGNblp5p" / X and (3) Team Phoenix 🔥🇵🇸 on X: "Zionism is Racism motion - Unfriendly amendment 1 Defeated - FOR 821 AGAINST 920 VICTORY" / X
Amendment 2: Unclear on content but may be similar to 1 - Amendment 2 Lost 798 to 948 Total vote cast 1,746. (3) Faye Brown on X: "UPDATE: Amendment 2 has failed, 3 is pending and 4 passed. Fourth is a technically on replacing old policy with this motion." / X and (5) Team Phoenix 🔥🇵🇸 on X: "Unfiendly Amendment 2 DEFEATED - FOR 798 AGAINST 948 Unfriendly actors repeatedly trying to delay procedures. 1st Plenary now extended 15 minutes by procedural request as pointed out.. people may go home before 2nd Plenary. Waiting for Card vote C Amendment 3 final vote" / X
Amendment 3: "Safeguards - ballot vote . Amendment 3 lost 684 to 1026. Total votes cast 1,710 (1) Faye Brown on X: "🟢 NEW: Green members have demanded a revote on amendments 1-3 of the Zionism is Racism motion, meaning they will now go to a paper count. I understand that Amendment 1 was narrowly voted down and the others were too close to call through a public vote of cards in the air." / X still counting vote lee harpin on X: "Senior Green Party source confirms count still taking place on result of amendment on safeguarding Jews" / X Speculation that it is lost: lee harpin on X: "Green Party spokesperson now openly briefing journos over possibility safeguarding Jews amendment will be voted down. They say “if it is voted down, then it will be because of this idea that it's unnecessary, rather than believe because people want the opposite of it.”" / X and (6) Team Phoenix 🔥🇵🇸 on X: "Unfriendly Amendment 3 FALLS FOR 684 AGAINST 1026 Vote for Zionism is Racism will be an unecessary card vote Will state the results later" / X and Faye Brown on X: "NEW: Amendment 3 has been voted down. This would have protected Jewish people from being expelled if they belong to synagogues that define themselves as Zionist. A Green Spox insists the motion will not do that but the amendment would have removed that ambiguity." / X
Amendment 4: Replacing old policy with motion was a technical motion. Amendment 4 passed presumably on a show of hands? (3) Faye Brown on X: "UPDATE: Amendment 2 has failed, 3 is pending and 4 passed. Fourth is a technically on replacing old policy with this motion." / X and (6) Team Phoenix 🔥🇵🇸 on X: "Zionism is Racism accepted Friendly Amendment 4 PASSED! 🎉" / X More here Jane on X: "Onto amendment 4, a technical detail. No one from the party can say how long this will all take as votes have to be individually counted. Mothin Ali told me he wasn’t sure how the main vote would go. Press still not allowed in - or anywhere near the door! https://t.co/GH8sG6dkrN" / X
Debate/Vote on the substantive Motion: After amendment votes now likely to pass by around 100 votes but maybe more? Motion PASSED 1022 to 813. Total votes cast 1,835. megan kenyon on X: "Breaking: The Green Party has passed Zionism is Racism 1022 for - 813 against" / X Ellie Chowns MP spoke against megan kenyon on X: "🟢Green Party members are currently debating the zionism is racism motion in Brighton's conference centre. I understand the Green Party's leader in Parliament Ellie Chowns is currently speaking against the motion on behalf of all the party's MPs" / X as did Caroline Lucas Turn Left Media on X: "🚨: Caroline Lucas on her feet speaking AGAINST the Zionism is Racism Motion" / X and Mothin Ali spoke for the motion (3) lee harpin on X: "Greens deputy leader Mothin Ali currently addressing Green Party delegates - in support of overall motion, obviously https://t.co/b2Yo3abzF4" / X Likely outcome (7) lee harpin on X: "Result of overall vote on Zionism is racism motion will be announced 2.15pm. But it’s a forgone conclusion." / X Online vote counted (2) megan kenyon on X: "I understand online voting on the motion has been counted - 290 for and 117 against. More than one person coming out of the hall has said they think the motion will pass unamended." / X
A summary of the 4 Amendment texts are here and all but Amendment 4 were lost:
Motion passed on BBC mutualisation as part of a whole new policy chapter on culture, media and sport
Conference passed D35 – a whole new disputes and complaints process
Motion passed to abandon its long-running opposition to nuclear power
Analysis and More detailed Reportage on Motions - general news items below
REVEALED IN FULL: Every Motion at Green Party Conference – Guido Fawkes Important to note this is a non-prioritised list of all the motions initially submitted from individual members to give a flavour of what is put forward. Members then vote online to prioritise motions before conference.
Conference Core Elements
Keynote Speeches from the Party Leader, Co-Deputies, and Wales Green Party Leader
Plenary Sessions: Debating and voting on major internal reports, constitutional amendments, and motions.
Internal Elections Hustings The elections themselves are conducted online as all member OMOV ballots - see more below.
Fringe Events
Factions and Special Interest Groups promoting Motions
Go to the Structures page for the list. Let us know if any more to add.
Rules Relevant to Conference
Interesting to note the Greens need 26 pages of standing order rules for their conference compared to just 3 pages for Labour anchored at it is by its Labour movement traditions from its TU Bloc vote & NEC powers
Issues/Organisations active at conference
A few items spotted where organisations are doing things at Green Conference
Conference News Items and online coverage
This is a list of online news and commentary on news involving the Green Party (which may cover some political elements of the Holborn & St Pancras by-election too) in the run up to Green conference from a very wide range of viewpoints which is provided as published online just for information/context. Green Party official responses are available on the Structures page with links to their Media Releases and X feed.
Pre-Conference
Polanski opposes 'divisive' Zionism is Racism motion - YouTube
lee harpin on X: "Zack Polanski brands Zionism as racism https://t.co/GjvMlE12sK" / X
Workers Party of Britain on X: "The Whore of Holborn. https://t.co/xB8n0WEOm1" / X
Adnan Hussain MP on X: "How are the landlord leaders of the green party doing?" / X
greens4palestine.uk/press/zionism-is-racism-why-it-matters-booklet-available
Who Does the Green Party’s ‘Zionism Is Racism’ Motion Really Serve? | Novara Media
(2) Birmingham Labour on X: "@rachelmillward are you there? https://t.co/5Ghji9fTzD" / X
Friday 2 October
Darren Johnson on X: "Party grandee wades in with understatement of the year." / X
Sky News on X: "The Green Party: Has the Polanski bubble burst? https://t.co/jKLBm7NkGh" / X
(1) Aaron Newbury on X: "So far the Green Party conference has more bars than Reform or Labour." / X
James Heale on X: "Greens say they now have 220,000 members" / X (Note: For data on Green Membership there is full analysis on the Structures page.
Green Feminists UK on X: "All is not well over at Green Elects. https://t.co/iO6tFoV9Iq" / X
Lewis Goodall on X: "Round of applause for Tony Benn at the Green Party conference." / X
James Heale on X: "Greens say they now have 220,000 members" / X
Greg Hadfield on X: "Zionism is racism! https://t.co/3aIVY3Ndki" / X
Senior Greens distance themselves from Zionism is Racism motion - The Jewish Chronicle
Helen Nettleship on X: "Is Kimchi Croissant one of the Green Party’s MPs?" / X
Saturday 3 October
ForgottenGenius on X: "Who should be the next leader of the Green Party?" / X
Greg Hadfield on X: "Zionism is racism. No ifs; no buts. And no amendments!" / X
Left Foot Forward on X: "The Green Party has a new health policy https://t.co/sfAFJ0OVXT" / X
Liam Holman 🏴 on X: "Polanski was his own second choice 😭" / X
Adrian Ramsay MP on X: "My statement on motion E02, Zionism is Racism https://t.co/5ugiGCLkCZ" / X
Ashok Kumar on X: "Vote to make the Green Party an anti-zionist party! https://t.co/w6ZI5ZfJML" / X
Sunday 4 October
Claire on X: "@charliemansell @GlenMitchell1 https://t.co/PJdHaXXyfs" / X Ellie Chowns statement
(2) Alexander Louis Sallons on X: "This was obvious to everyone btw." / X
Turn Left Media on X: "🚨: The Zionism is racism vote is being held now, earlier than expected" / X
Jack Robinson on X: "Leadership is when you runaway apparently" / X
lee harpin on X: "Shamefully the amendment on “safeguarding Jews” result “too close to call.”" / X
lee harpin on X: "Amendment 1 didn’t pass https://t.co/lsTGNblp5p" / X
(5) Juliet Brown 🇵🇸🍉 on X: "@LeftPhoenix Thank you! ❤️ Good for @MothinAli. Lucas needs to go!" / X
(6) Team Phoenix 🔥🇵🇸 on X: "Zionism is Racism accepted Friendly Amendment 4 PASSED! 🎉" / X
Colin the Dachshund on X: "France's response to hearing about Kimchi Croissants." / X
ForgottenGenius on X: "This is pathetic. Polanski had a online vote, but he bottled it." / X
Sabrina Miller on X: "Has anyone heard from Hannah Spencer?" / X
(1) teresa smith on X: "How did the @mayorofhackney vote?" / X
(1) teresa smith on X: "On the 90th anniversary of Cable Street:" / X
(1) Curtis Daly on X: "Media aren't allowed in any votes, it's standard procedure." / X
Team Phoenix 🔥🇵🇸 on X: "Zionism is Racism motion FOR 1022 AGAINST 813 PASSES!!" / X
Jane on X: "@EllieChowns @CarolineLucas @natalieben 1022-813 Zionism is Racism motion PASSED" / X
lee harpin on X: "Zionism is racism motion passed. 1022 to 813" / X
(4) The Crispin Flintoff Show on X: "'ZIONISM IS RACISM' For 1022, Against 813" / X
(5) Greens4Palestine on X: "Zionism is Racism has passed. https://t.co/GT4loA2zeY" / X
After the Greens for Palestine ZIR Motion - Online Comment
Michael Chessum on X: "@CarolineLucas @MothinAli @EllieChowns For clarity, I voted against it." / X
(2) Caroline Lucas on X: "I’m glad this has been said 👇 https://t.co/Dy9UKkYcAd" / X
Ben 🇬🇧 on X: "The Green Party now brands Zack Polanski's mum a racist. https://t.co/DzJ1KJlUeB" / X
(1) Alan Griffiths on X: "@carla_denyer https://t.co/cgM5d02Nl4" / X
Matthew Sweet on X: "The view of the head of @antisempolicy" / X
Paul Mason on X: "They were too busy condemning Zionism to condemn Putin 👇🏽" / X
Zarah Sultana MP on X: "Reminder: anti-Zionism is not antisemitism. The smears won’t work." / X
(2) Alexander Louis Sallons on X: "But it's done now, it'll be reviewed in 2 years." / X
(2) Daniel Laycock on X: "In May I took leave from active politics and from the Green Party. After today, I will not be returning to the Green Party." / X Person who ran Green Elects
Solma Ahmed #betterworld🇵🇸 on X: "At last I’ve made my decision. I’ve joined @TheGreenParty tonight. Zionism is Racism vote has persuaded me to join the party. I’m looking forward to seeing what future holds as a party of the anti racist." / X Former Your Party CEC member on the Zarah Sultana Grassroots Left slate who resigned from it recently