― Malcolm Gladwell
Audience is a rhetorical concept that refers to the individuals and groups that writers attempt to move, inciting them to action or inspiring shifts in attitudes and beliefs. Thinking about audience can help us understand who texts are intended for, or who they are ideally suited for, and how writers use writing to respond to and move those people. While it may not be possible to ever fully “know” one’s audience, writers who are good rhetorical thinkers know how to access and use information about their audiences to make educated guesses about their needs, values, and expectations—hopefully engaging in rhetorically fitting writing practices and crafting and delivering use texts. In short, to think about audience is to consider how people influence, encounter, and use any given text.
Who is the actual audience for this text and how do you know?
Who is the invoked audience for the text and where do you see evidence for this in the text?
What knowledge, beliefs, and positions does the audience bring to the subject-at-hand?
What does the audience know or not know about the subject?
What does the audience need or expect from the writer and text?
When, where, and how will the audience encounter the text and how has the text—and its content—responded to this?
What roles or personas (e.g., insider/outsider or expert/novice) does the writer create for the audience? Where are these personas presented in the text and why?
How should/has the audience influenced the development of the text?
Audiences are characterized by the questions they ask when they read. As a writer, you want to consider your readers' reasons for viewing your text.
Instructors: When instructors are your primary audience, they may ask:
Did the student follow instructions?
Does the student's writing reflect understanding of central course concepts?
Do the student's opening paragraphs explain the purpose, its significance, and forecast the organization?
Did the student follow conventions for citing, paraphrasing, and summarizing sources?
Is the document written well, following grammatical, mechanical, and punctuation rules?
Technicians/Users: When you are writing as the expert, explaining how to do something, your users are likely to ask:
Does the text clarify in a step-by-step order what I am supposed to do?
Are warnings and safety precautions clearly presented?
Can I skim through the visuals and flow diagrams rather than read the text?
Where do I go for additional help?
Decision Makers: When someone is in a position of making decisions, he or she may be harassed by demands on his or her time. As a result, he or she may grow impatient if you don't immediately present your request. Decisions makers may only read your abstract or introduction. Additional questions the reader may ask include:
Does the writer provide cogent and persuasive evidence for his or her claim?
Who will benefit and who will be hurt by enacting this proposal?
Is the author capable of carrying out the proposed work?
Internet Skimmers: Researchers have found that people approach documents published on the Internet with a different set of expectations than they would a traditional text. Although online readers can be motivated to read carefully, they tend to be more likely to skim online documents than printed documents. These readers may ask:
Are key points summarized at the top of the browser window?
Are visuals, animations, audio clips, and video clips used to illustrate key points?
Is the text chunked into minimalist portions?How do I move around in the site?
Interestingly, writers and writing teachers do not always agree about exactly when you should consider your audience. It's possible, for example, that thinking about an audience early in the writing process can be intimidating. When addressing a difficult subject, some writers may be so concerned with developing the material for themselves that they don't want to pause or complicate matters by questioning what others would think about the subject. They may even write a few drafts before questioning how their words and ideas will affect readers.
Nonetheless, you are wise to consider your audience as early as possible in the writing process. Asking yourself the following questions can help you solidify your sense of audience.
Who is your primary audience? a teacher? a parent or loved one? fellow students? a politician? a university committee? a broad, general audience such as subscribers to a weekly magazine like Time or Newsweek? Are they a lay audience, executives, experts, or technicians?
Does your document have multiple audiences? Can you discern an important secondary audience? If so, how will you account for the needs of this audience? Should you have separate sections in your document that address the needs of these different audiences?
What factors impinge on how your audience will feel about your subject? For instance, are you addressing someone who is overcome by grief or emotional problems?
How knowledgeable are your primary and secondary audiences about your subject? What concepts or terms will you need to define for these audiences? What level of education does your primary audience have?
You will face situations when you are unsure about what your audience knows about a topic or how the audience may feel about the topic. You will not always be able to make informed guesses about your audience's level of education, knowledge about the topic, or interest in the topic. As a result, you may need to rely on an internalized, imaginary audience. In other words, you may need to make educated guesses about the needs, education, and likely reactions of the people who are likely to read your work.
Linda Flower is professor of English at Carnegie-Mellon University, where she directed the Business Communication program for a number of years. She has been a leading researcher on the composing process, and the results of her investigations have shaped and informed her influential writing text Problem-Solving Strategies for Writing, now in its fifth edition (1999). In this selection, which is taken from that text, Flower’s focus is on audience – the people for whom we write. She believes that writers must establish a “common ground” between themselves and their readers, one that lessens their differences in knowledge, attitudes, and needs. Although we can never be certain who might read what we write, it is nevertheless important for us to have a target audience in mind. Many of the decisions that we make as writers are influenced by that real or imagined reader.
1) The goal of the writer is to create a momentary common ground between the reader and the writer. You want the reader to share your knowledge and your attitude toward that knowledge. Even if the reader eventually disagrees, you want him or her to be able for the moment to see things as you see them. A good piece of writing closes the gap between you and the reader.
2) The first step in closing that gap is to gauge the distance between the two of you. Imagine, for example, that you are a student writing your parents, who have always lived in New York City, about a wilderness survival expedition you want to go on over spring break. Sometimes obvious differences such as age or background will be important, but the critical differences for writers usually fall into three areas: the reader’s knowledge about the topic; his or her attitude toward it, and his or her personal or professional needs. Because these differences often exist, good writers do more than simply express their meaning; they pinpoint the critical differences between themselves and their reader and design their writing to reduce these differences. Let us look at these areas in more detail.
3) Knowledge. This is usually the easiest difference to handle. What does your reader need to know? What are the main ideas you hope to teach? Does your reader have enough background knowledge to really understand you? If not, what would he or she have to learn?
4) Attitudes. When we say a person has knowledge, we usually refer to his conscious awareness of explicit facts and clearly defined concepts. This kind of knowledge can be easily written down or told to someone else. However, much of what we “know” is not held in this formal, explicit way. Instead it is held as an attitude or image – as a loose cluster of associations. For instance, my image of lakes includes associations many people would have, including fishing, water skiing, stalled outboards, and lots of kids catching night crawlers with flashlights. However, the most salient or powerful parts of my image, which strongly color my whole attitude toward lakes, are thoughts of cloudy skies, long rainy days, and feeling generally cold and damp. By contrast, one of my best friends has a very different cluster of associations: to him a lake means sun, swimming, sailing, and happily sitting on the end of a dock. Needless to say, our differing images cause us to react quite differently to a proposal that we visit a lake. Likewise, one reason people often find it difficult to discuss religion and politics is that terms such as “capitalism” conjure up radically different images.
5) As you can see, a reader’s image of a subject is often the source of attitudes and feelings that are unexpected and, at times, impervious to mere facts. A simple statement that seems quite persuasive to you, such as “Lake Wampago would be a great place to locate the new music camp,” could have little impact on your reader if he or she simply doesn’t visualize a lake as a “great place.” In fact, many people accept uncritically any statement that fits in with their own attitudes – and reject, just as uncritically, anything that does not.
6) Whether your purpose is to persuade or simply to present your perspective, it helps to know the image and attitudes that your reader already holds. The more these differ from your own, the more you will have to do to make him or her see what you mean.
7) Needs. When writers discover a larger gap between their own knowledge and attitudes and those of the reader, they usually try to change the reader in some way. Needs, however, are different. When you analyze a reader’s needs, it is so that you, the writer, can adapt to him. If you ask a friend majoring in biology how to keep your fish tank from clouding, you don’t want to hear a textbook recitation on the life processes of algae. You except a friend to adapt his or her knowledge and tell you exactly how to solve your problem.
8) The ability to adapt your knowledge to the needs of the reader is often crucial to your success as a writer. This is especially true in writing done on a job. For example, as producer of a public affairs program for a television station, 80 percent of your time may be taken up planning the details of new shows, contacting guests, and scheduling the taping sessions. But when you write a program proposal to the station director, your job is show how the program will fit into the cost guidelines, the FCC requirements for relevance, and the overall programming plan for the station. When you write that report your role in the organization changes from producer to proposal writer. Why? Because your reader needs that information in order to make a decision. He may be interested in your scheduling problems and the specific content of the shows, but he reads your report because of his own needs as station director of the organization. He has to act.
9) In college, where the reader is also a teacher, the reader’s needs are a little less concrete but just as important. Most papers are assigned as a way to teach something. So the real purpose of a paper may be for you to make connections between historical periods, to discover for yourself the principle behind a laboratory experiment, or to develop and support your own interpretation of a novel. A good college paper doesn’t just rehash the facts; it demonstrates what your reader, as a teacher, needs to know – that you are learning the thinking skills his or her course is trying to teach.
10) Effective writers are not simply expressing what they know, like a student madly filling up an examination blue book. Instead they are using their knowledge: reorganizing, maybe even rethinking their ideas to meet the demands of an assignment or the needs of their reader.
Numbers x) indicate paragraph numbers in the above article
Your professor asks you to write an academic argument paper on a topic of your choice. Academic writing is usually directed to an educated audience interested in critical, analytical thinking.
Let’s imagine you choose to write about adoption rights within the LGBT community. More specifically, you’ll argue that stable LGBT couples deserve the opportunity to adopt children just as stable heterosexual couples are allowed to do.
You’ll adapt tone, language, and appeals to suit the writing project’s
Audience
Purpose
Context
Medium
When you write to all readers, you, in fact, write to no one at all.
Click image to enlarge