I am a fifth-year Ph.D. student in Economics at Bocconi University, Milan.
My advisors are Nicola Pavoni, Massimo Morelli and Luca Braghieri.
My primary research interest is in behavioural and cognitive economics. In my work, I combine theory, experiments and text-analysis methods to explore (i) imperfect metacognition and (ii) narratives, focusing on their implications for political, labour and education economics.
Moreover, I work on the theory of information economics and experimentation.
Before starting my Ph.D., I studied Applied Mathematics at Polytechnic of Turin (B.Sc.) and Logic at University of Turin (M.Sc.). Alongside, I had the opportunity to be an Allievo of the Collegio Carlo Alberto.
You can access my full CV here.
When I am not doing research, I am mostly busy hunting songs that sound like each other.
I am always down to talk.
Please get in touch at francesco.bilotta2@phd.unibocconi.it if you like!
Working Papers
Presentations: Princeton Junior Micro Seminar, Boston College PhD Conference, HEC PhD Conference, Milan PhD Workshop, 1st Berlin Micro Theory and Behavioral Econ PhD Conference, Transatlantic Theory Workshop.
Abstract: I develop a framework to analyze student decision-making in multiple-choice tests. I use it to show that a broad class of benchmark assumptions imply a common behavioral prediction: when a student omits more questions, their relative share of correct answers should not decrease. Using data from a large field experiment, I document systematic violations of this principle. To rationalize the puzzle, I propose a model of imperfect metacognition where students differ in the ability to monitor their own knowledge, compatible with a Bayesian foundation. Calibrating the model parameters, I uncover meaningful gender heterogeneity: although equally metacognitively accurate, females are relatively better at recognizing low-success questions, while males high-success ones. This asymmetry implies that the gender gap in test scores should widen with knowledge -- a prediction confirmed in the data and not replicated by alternative explanations.
Blameocracy (with Alberto Binetti and Giacomo Manferdini)
Presentations: Princeton Junior PE Seminar, Workshop on Text-as-Data at Lancaster, 2nd Verona Early Career Workshop, Potsdam Text-as-Data in Behavioral Economics, XIV Alghero IBEO Workshop, Milan PhD Workshop, 1st Berlin Micro Theory and Behavioral Econ PhD Conference, 10th Monash-Paris-Warwick-Zurich-CEPR Text-As-Data Workshop, 1st CEPR Annual Interdisciplinary Conference at WZB (planned), Ludwig Erhard ifo Research Workshop (planned)
Abstract: We propose a supervised method to detect causal attribution in political texts, distinguishing between expressions of merit and blame. Analyzing four million tweets shared by U.S. Congress members from 2012 to 2023, we document a pronounced shift toward causal attribution following the 2016 presidential election. The shift reflects changes in rhetorical strategy rather than compositional variation in the actors or topics of the political debate. Within causal communication, a trade-off emerges between positive and negative tone, with power status as the key determinant: government emphasizes merit, while opposition casts blame. This pattern distinguishes causal from purely affective communication. Additionally, we find that blame is associated with lower trust in politicians, perceived government effectiveness, and spreads more virally than merit.
Coarse Memory and Plausible Narratives (with Giacomo Manferdini) - submitted.
Best Graduate Paper at 2025 Lisbon Meetings in Game Theory and Applications.
Presentations: 16th UniTo-CCA PhD Workshop, UC Davis Microeconomic Theory Seminar, EEA-ESEM 2024 Rotterdam, XVIII GRASS Workshop Turin, 2025 Lisbon Meetings in Game Theory and Applications
Abstract: In a political economy framework, we study how false narratives emerge in response to limitation in recipients' memory, proposing an approach based on partial identification. Coarse memory allows voters to retrieve marginal frequencies of past policies and outcomes, but prevents them from understanding their correlations. Politicians exploit such vagueness by designing narratives inflating the effectiveness of their commitment policy, while satisfying the constraint imposed by marginals (plausibility). We find that plausible narratives can be less optimistic about a policy the more it has been implemented. In a model of narrative-based competition, we show that opposing narratives are polarized and that, in the long run, political cycles arise. In particular, politicians hold office with the same frequency, irrespective of the objective quality of their commitment policy. Our mechanisms are consistent with an analysis of U.S. Congress members' rhetorical strategies.
Work in Progress
Disagreeing (with Luca Braghieri, Collin Raymond, and Mark Whitmeyer)
Metacognition in Human-AI Interaction (with Rafael Jiménez-Durán, Salvatore Nunnari, and Nicola Pavoni)
Discovering Bandits (with Burkhard C. Schipper)
Delegated Information Acquisition (with Christoph Carnehl and Justus Preusser)
Other Research
Before delving into (behavioral) economic theory, I had the pleasure to wander at the intersection of logic, category theory and general systems theory. Here is my Master Thesis (under the supervision of Prof. Felice Cardone) where I try to give an interpretation of George Spencer-Brown's Laws of Form in terms of universal (co)algebra.
Teaching
This year I am a TA for the following courses at Bocconi University:
Decisions and Organizations, M.Sc. in Politics and Policy Analysis, Prof. Passarelli
Introduction to Mathematics, PhD in Economics and Finance, Prof. Turansick
Game Theory, PhD in Economics and Finance, Prof. Battigalli
Advanced Microeconomics, M.Sc. in Economics and Social Sciences, Prof. Pavoni