Embedded Files
Table of Contents:
Significance of Analyzing Gun Violence Data
Significance of Analyzing Gun Violence Data
The issue of gun-related deaths in the United States has persisted as a critical societal concern, marking a longstanding challenge affecting the nation's public health and safety. Over the span of three decades, the prevalence of gun-related fatalities has posed a substantial threat, contributing to a profound loss of lives and triggering ongoing debates about firearm regulations and societal safety measures.
Statistics and research data suggest a grim reality, with a staggering number of individuals succumbing to gun-related incidents during this period. The cumulative impact is deeply alarming, with an estimation of fatalities reaching a significant count, reflecting a substantial toll on communities and families nationwide.
The examination of data holds pivotal importance, shedding light on the evolving landscape of gun violence, and prompting comprehensive discussions on legislative reforms, public safety interventions, and community-driven initiatives. The exploration of this dataset becomes integral in comprehending the multifaceted nature of gun-related fatalities, emphasizing the need for effective strategies to mitigate this pressing public health concern.
Mortality Rate
Mortality Rate
The bar graph illustrates the distressing reality of gun-related fatalities in the United States, focusing on the top 10 states (most recent, 2021) deeply affected by these incidents. Each bar represents a state, showcasing the stark disparity in death rates due to firearms. The mortality rate values used throughout this website have been population adjusted to a scale of per 100,000 people (Obtained from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)) . This visualization highlights the disproportionate impact of gun violence across these regions, emphasizing the urgent need for targeted interventions and policy reforms to curb this concerning trend. The graph serves as a compelling call for comprehensive strategies to address the pervasive issue of gun-related tragedies and safeguard communities.
2021 Worst Performing States
2021 Best Performing States
In the context of gun-related fatalities, the bar graph highlighting the top 10 states with the highest death rates in 2021 vividly showcases the substantial variations in mortality rates across different states within the United States. Mississippi emerges as the state with the most alarming rate of 33.9, drawing attention to the urgent need for comprehensive measures to address gun violence in the region. Following closely, Louisiana and New Mexico demonstrate alarming rates of 29.1 and 27.8, respectively. On the contrary, Massachusetts displays a significantly lower rate of 3.4, illustrating a substantial contrast. These disparities underscore the critical importance of tailored interventions and targeted policies to address the complex factors contributing to gun-related fatalities, aiming to enhance public safety and well-being across communities nationwide.
Gun Mortality Rates Over Time
This visualization is categorized based on the region the state belongs to and helps compare the change (increase or decrease) in rates across years.
You may select or deselect Years(colored bubbles) and Regions to narrow down results.
The averages death rates for each of the six years have been annotated with dashed lines.2021's national average gun death rate was 16.36, In 2020 it was 15.134, 2017 and 2019 have similar averages 13.4 and 13.5 respectively, 2015 shows 12.4 and in 2005 it was 10.81.
we can observe a very small increase in the national average across years.
Southern regions of the U.S. can be seen to have higher gun death rates compared to other regions with averages of 21 (Southeast) and 20.7 (Southwest) , followed by West , 16.7 and Midwest at 15.25. Northeast is the region with least rates at an average of 8.21 deaths per 100,000 people.
In assessing the gun mortality rates across different regions of the United States in 2021, the national average stands at 16.36. Focusing specifically on the Southeast, Mississippi emerges as the worst-performing state with a rate of 33.9, while Florida leads as the best-performing state with a rate of 14.10. Notably, several states in this region, including West Virginia, Tennessee, South Carolina, North Carolina, Mississippi, Louisiana, Kentucky, Georgia, Delaware, Arkansas, and Alabama, surpass the national average. Conversely, Virginia, Maryland, and Florida fall below this benchmark.
Turning to the Southwest, New Mexico ranks as the worst-performing state with a rate of 27.8, contrasting with Texas as the best-performing state with a rate of 15.6. Noteworthy is the above-average performance of Oklahoma, New Mexico, and Arizona, while Texas sits below the national average.
In the West, Wyoming records the highest rate at 26.10, while Hawaii boasts the lowest at 4.8. States above the national average in this region include Wyoming, Montana, Nevada, Colorado, and Alaska, while Washington, Utah, Oregon, Hawaii, and California fall below. Idaho teeters on the brink.
Moving to the Midwest, Missouri reports the highest rate at 23.2, with Minnesota demonstrating the best performance at 10. Above-average states in this region encompass Ohio, North Dakota, Missouri, Kansas, and Indiana, while Wisconsin, South Dakota, Nebraska, Minnesota, Michigan, Illinois, and Iowa fall below.
Finally, in the Northeast, Pennsylvania emerges as the worst-performing state with a rate of 14.8, while Massachusetts claims the title of the best-performing state with a rate of 3.4. Interestingly, no state in this region surpasses the national average, and below-average states include Vermont, Rhode Island, Pennsylvania, New York, New Jersey, New Hampshire, Maine, Massachusetts, and Connecticut. This comprehensive analysis sheds light on the varied gun mortality rates across the nation, emphasizing the critical need for regional-specific interventions and policy considerations.
Homicide vs Suicide
Homicide vs Suicide
Difference between firearm homicide and suicide by months (2019-2023)
The rates of firearm homicides as well as the average daily totals by month and year are displayed in the figures below. We can observe that in 2019, there wasn't much change or growth in the gun shootings. But in 2020, there was a significant increase from February to July, and then a dip in the firearm homicide. The daily average per month per year also keeps increasing throughout the years from 2019-2021, but a good decrease from 2021 to 2022. This might be because of proper implementation of gun laws or less misuse of gun or firearms.
The incidence of gun-related deaths is influenced by the availability of firearms as well as a number of social and economic variables. Gun-related killings have an impact not just on the victims but also on families, communities, and the country at large. The availability of firearms, both legal and illicit, is a major factor in how frequently these kinds of situations occur. A effective plan must balance the rights of the individual with the needs of the public, address underlying issues, and put evidence-based policies into place.
The numbers below show the rates of firearm-related suicides as well as the average daily totals by month and year. The average for 2019 and 2020 is almost same, but when we observe 2021 graph, we can see that the daily average of suicides per month in 2021, has become substantially higher, which climbed from 66.37 to 72.13. The upward trend in suicide rates is seen in 2022 also, where the daily average has increased to 74.06
A substantial and worrisome component of the larger problem of gun-related occurrences in the US is the issue of firearm suicides.There may be a higher risk of firearm suicides among some demographic groupings. For example, those who are older, veterans, or experiencing financial difficulties may be at a higher risk. Strategies for preventing suicide frequently center on limiting access to weapons and other fatal tools. This can entail putting waiting periods on gun sales into place, encouraging safe storage methods, and running public awareness campaigns about how crucial it is to restrict access to dangerous weapons during times of need.
Injuries vs Fatalities
Injuries vs Fatalities
The bar graph depicting fatalities resulting from gun violence reveals a stark reality across the United States, with the y-axis highlighting the top ten states witnessing the highest number of casualties and the x-axis delineating the corresponding figures of individuals either injured or deceased. Remarkably, Mississippi turns out to be the state where these sad events result in the greatest number of deaths, indicating a very worrying trend. This sobering number is a result of Mississippi's startlingly high rate of illegal gun ownership. In contrast, the state of Wyoming, stands out for having the highest number of people injured and even dead. The length of each bar in the graphic, which represents a state, indicates how many people were hurt or died in the top ten states in the US. This finding was derived from a Kaggle dataset spanning the years 1924–2022.
One of the main causes of the gun violence problem is the accessibility of firearms. The United States has a large population of civilian gun owners, and the ease with which people can acquire firearms has sparked worries about the possible escalation of gun violence and illegal weapons trafficking. Despite the difficulties, attempts to implement laws intended to lower gun violence are still being made at a number of levels. These include resolutions to support responsible gun ownership, limitations on magazines with a large capacity, and suggestions for background checks that apply to everyone.
A Comparison Between Mass and Spree Shootings
A Comparison Between Mass and Spree Shootings
Mass shootings have unfortunately been a recurring issue in the United States, and the fatalities resulting from such incidents have captured national attention. Some of the deadliest mass shootings which happened in the United States of America has had a devastating impact of mass shootings on individuals, families, and communities, mass shootings, as we observe, there are more fatalities than those who are wounded. In the donut chart given below, 53.46% of fatalities have occurred and 46.53% of people were injured.
In some cases, spree shootings may result in fewer fatalities but a higher number of wounded individuals. The dynamics of each incident can be influenced by factors such as the shooter's intent, the locations targeted, and the response of law enforcement or others present. We can observe that in our donut chart below, where 46.15% fatalities and 53.85% people were wounded.
Hence, we can observe that in mass shootings, there were less people who were wounded as compared to spree shootings.
Mass Shootings
Spree Shootings
Demographic Factors
Demographic Factors
1.Victim Sex
1.Victim Sex
The bar chart illustrates the distribution of male and female victims among the top 10 states with the highest death rates due to gun-related incidents. Wyoming, with a considerable victim count, demonstrates a notable gender distribution of 68.44% male victims to 31.56% female victims. Conversely, Alaska, with comparatively fewer fatalities, exhibits a gender distribution of 77.78% male victims to 22.22% female victims. These statistics emphasize the differential impact of gun violence across states and the varying gender compositions within these tragic incidents, calling for nuanced approaches in implementing targeted interventions for enhanced public safety
Each bar in the chart represents a state, and the length of the bars demonstrates the percentage of male and female victims in these states. The dark red-colored sections of the bars signify the percentage of male victims, while the light red-colored sections represent the percentage of female victims.
2. Victim Age
2. Victim Age
The age distribution of gun violence victims across all U.S. states is visually represented in a right-skewed histogram plot, with a concentration of frequencies towards the younger age range. Specifically, the highest frequencies are evident in the age range of 15 to 30, reaching a peak at ages 20 to 25.
The right skewness of the histogram implies a decrease in the number of gun violence victims at older ages, with a notable prevalence of incidents among individuals in the younger age groups. The average age of gun violence victims is calculated at 31.09, highlighting that while the majority of incidents occur in the 15 to 30 age range, there is a tail extending towards older ages, contributing to the right skewness. This distribution pattern is likely influenced by a myriad of social, economic, and demographic factors that contribute to the observed age distribution of gun violence incidents across the United States.
Moreover, the detailed frequencies within specific age ranges accentuate the prevalence of gun violence incidents: around 6600 for ages 15 to 20, approximately 8100 for ages 20 to 25, and around 6400 for ages 25 to 30. These figures provide a more granular understanding of the age distribution dynamics, emphasizing the significance of younger age groups in gun violence incidents.
3 Worst Performing States
Mississippi
In Mississippi, the age distribution of gun violence victims is characterized by a skewed histogram plot, notably skewed to the right. The majority of frequencies are concentrated in the age range of 20 to 30, with a pronounced peak around ages 20 to 25. Specifically, the peak frequency was around 850 for ages 20 to 25, followed by approximately 790 for ages 25 to 30. This indicates that a significant proportion of gun violence incidents in Mississippi involve individuals in their early to mid-20s, with a continued frequency for those in their late 20s.
The right skewness suggests that the occurrence of gun violence incidents tends to decrease for older age groups, contributing to the elongation of the distribution towards the younger ages. The calculated average age of gun violence victims in Mississippi is 33.09. Despite the high frequency around ages 20 to 30, the tail of the distribution extends beyond this range, with some incidents involving individuals in older age groups.
In Louisiana, the distribution of gun violence victims' ages is characterized by a right-skewed histogram plot, emphasizing a concentration in the 20 to 30 age range. The histogram reveals a distinct peak, with around 3400 incidents occurring among individuals aged 20 to 25, followed by an additional peak of approximately 2600 incidents for those aged 25 to 30. This pattern underscores that a significant number of gun violence cases in Louisiana involve individuals in their early to mid-20s, with a secondary emphasis on individuals in their late 20s.
The right skewness of the distribution indicates a diminishing frequency of gun violence incidents for older age groups, contributing to the elongation of the distribution toward younger ages. The calculated average age of gun violence victims in Louisiana is 30.40. Despite the majority of incidents clustering around ages 20 to 30, the distribution extends beyond this range, signifying that some incidents involve individuals in older age groups.
Louisiana
New Mexico
In New Mexico, the distribution of gun violence victims' ages is visualized through a right-skewed histogram, predominantly concentrated in the age range of 15 to 30. Notably, there are around 320 incidents for ages 15 to 20, a peak frequency of approximately 425 for ages 20 to 25, and roughly 370 incidents for ages 25 to 30. This underscores that a significant number of gun violence incidents in New Mexico involve individuals in their mid-teens to early 30s, with a notable emphasis on ages 20 to 25.
The distribution implies a decrease in the frequency of gun violence incidents for older age groups, contributing to the right skewness. The calculated average age of gun violence victims in New Mexico is 32.64, suggesting that, while the majority of incidents are concentrated around ages 15 to 30, there is an extension of the distribution beyond this range.
Firearm Usage Trends
Firearm Usage Trends
Colormap visualization provides an in-depth analysis of weapon usage trends in gun-related incidents recorded from 1985 to 2018 in the United States. The visualization leverages varying shades of dark red to represent the frequency or count of different weapons involved in these incidents. Darker shades within the visualization correspond to higher counts, indicating a greater occurrence of specific weapons being used in these incidents.
By associating each shade of red with a numeric value, the visualization effectively portrays the distribution and prevalence of various weapons across the dataset's timeline. This visualization method allows analysts to discern patterns and fluctuations in the utilization of different weapons over the years. It offers valuable insights into the prominence of specific firearms or weapons within gun-related incidents, facilitating a more comprehensive understanding of weapon usage trends and their potential impact on public safety.
A Comprehensive Analysis of Select Firearm Laws
A Comprehensive Analysis of Select Firearm Laws
State Firearm Law Navigator
RAND, a nonprofit research organization established in 1948, is dedicated to developing solutions for public policy challenges to enhance the safety and security of communities worldwide. In this context, we have utilized a comprehensive longitudinal database of state firearm laws maintained by RAND, which is freely accessible to the public. While the database encompasses 20 categories of gun laws with various subcategories, this visualization specifically concentrates on three critical aspects: background check laws, child-access prevention laws, and concealed-carry laws.
To explore the data, you can choose a specific type of gun law from the dropdown menu and click on play (followed by stop and play again) or use the slider to select a year between 1820 and 2022. This interactive visualization allows you to observe the percentage of states with laws related to the selected category and the degree of restriction, where darker colors indicate more stringent regulations, for the chosen year.
Providing an overview of the selected laws:
Background checks for gun purchases are implemented to restrict access to firearms for individuals with disqualifying factors, such as convicted felons and those deemed prohibited possessors. The Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, enacted in 1994, introduced federal mandates for background checks specifically for sales facilitated by licensed dealers. However, this regulation did not extend to private sales or transfers of firearms. Certain states have taken steps to broaden this federal requirement by mandating background checks for private firearm sales and transfers within their jurisdiction.
While federal law delineates categories of individuals barred from possessing firearms, it does not place restrictions on the public carrying of concealed weapons. However, it explicitly extends concealed-carry privileges to active and retired law enforcement officers under 18 U.S.C. 926. State legislations commonly outline the eligibility criteria for individuals allowed to carry concealed weapons and the requisite procedures for exercising this right. In many states, obtaining a permit is a prerequisite for carrying a concealed weapon. States following "shall-issue" laws automatically grant permits to applicants who are not prohibited possessors, while "may-issue" states provide law enforcement with more discretion in issuing permits.
Child-access prevention (CAP) laws empower prosecutors to press charges against adults who knowingly or negligently permit children unsupervised access to firearms. The primary objective of CAP laws is to diminish unintentional firearm injuries and fatalities, suicides, and youth-involved violent crimes. This is primarily achieved by limiting children's access to stored guns. It's worth noting that, at times, less robust laws concentrating solely on the reckless provision of firearms to children are also contemplated alongside CAP laws.
1.Mississippi : Deaths: 962 ;
Background Checks: sales from dealer: federal
Concealed Carry Laws: shall issue(permit not required)
Child Access Prevention: reckless provision
Mississippi possesses the least stringent gun laws in the nation. The state lacks fundamental gun laws and has only a handful of policies. Notably, it recently eliminated the mandate for obtaining a permit before openly carrying a concealed handgun in public.
2. Louisiana : Deaths: 1314;
Background Checks: sales from dealer: federal
Concealed Carry Laws: shall issue
Child Access Prevention: None
Louisiana exhibits lax gun laws and ranks second-highest in gun deaths across the United States. The state lacks a mandate for individuals to undergo a criminal background check before buying a firearm from an unlicensed seller. Additionally, Louisiana has a Shoot First law, permitting individuals to use deadly force even when safe retreat from a confrontation is feasible.
3. New Mexico : Deaths: 578;
Background Checks: private sales
Concealed Carry Laws: shall issue
Child Access Prevention: None
In the past few years, New Mexico has undertaken crucial measures to enhance its gun laws, although there remains substantial potential for further improvement in addressing gun violence. In 2019, the state implemented laws mandating background checks for nearly all firearm transactions and restricting access to guns for individuals with domestic violence convictions or court orders
4. Alabama : Deaths: 1315;
Background Checks: sales from dealer: federal
Concealed Carry Laws: shall issue
Child Access Prevention: None
Alabama possesses some of the most lenient gun laws in the nation. The state recently exacerbated its already weak regulations by implementing permit-less carry and is persistently introducing potentially detrimental legislation, such as the Shoot First law within church premises. In 2018, Governor Kay Ivey endorsed a memorandum granting school administrators the authority to carry guns at schools, provided they meet the criteria outlined in the Alabama Sentry Program, thereby allowing the arming of teachers in schools.
5. Wyoming : Deaths: 155;
Background Checks: sales from dealer
Concealed Carry Laws: shall issue(permit not required)
Child Access Prevention: None
Wyoming exhibits weak gun regulations and holds the highest rate of gun suicides in the nation. In the past decade, Wyoming experienced a more pronounced rise in its suicide rate compared to the national average.
Gun Purchase Trends
Gun Purchase Trends
Major events in the US, like mass shootings or political shifts, often lead to fluctuations in gun sales. Increased concerns about personal safety and potential changes in gun regulations drive heightened demand. Public discourse on gun rights, influenced by major incidents, prompts panic buying and proactive purchases by those exercising their Second Amendment rights. The dynamic interplay of fear, anticipation, and political factors contributes to the impact on gun sales.
Following the 9/11 attacks on September 11, 2001, there was a 1.7% increase in sales in the United States. During Barack Obama's presidential elections in 2009, gun sales surged by 7.4%. The tragic Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting on December 14, 2012, resulting in the loss of 20 children and six adults, led to a substantial increase in gun sales, reaching 26%. The San Bernardino shooting on December 2, 2015, carried out by a married couple in a mass shooting that resulted in 14 fatalities, contributed to an 8.1% increase. The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020 triggered an unprecedented surge in gun sales, with an increase of 66%. These patterns illustrate the complex and contentious nature of the gun control debate following high-profile incidents.
The table below facilitates an in-depth analysis of shifts in gun sales, indicating either an increase or decrease compared to the previous year of your preference. By selecting a pivotal year, you can explore the discussed trends and gauge the impact of these events on different states.
Upon closer examination of the changes in gun sales in 2020 (Beginning of COVID), it becomes evident that there was a nationwide increase of 66%. Notably, Alabama, Arizona, the District of Columbia, Georgia, Michigan, Rhode Island, and Utah experienced increases exceeding 100%, while Puerto Rico exhibited the smallest increase at 2.8% followed by Connecticut at 28.6%. Remarkably, every single state witnessed an increase, highlighting a notable pattern
Firearm Mortality Rate and Gun Sales , Correlated ?
Firearm Mortality Rate and Gun Sales , Correlated ?
In this section, we have utilized datasets obtained from the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) for firearm sales and death rate data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The data spans from 2014 to 2021, and both firearm sales and death rates have been adjusted per 100,000 population.
Choose a specific year to examine the correlation between gun sales and gun death rates during that particular period
The observed correlation coefficients for the years 2017 to 2021, between gun sales and gun mortality rate, are as follows: 0.65, 0.64, 0.66, 0.69, and 0.64. These coefficients indicate the strength and direction of the linear relationship between the two variables for each respective year, with values being closer to 1 suggesting a stronger positive correlation.
On analyzing the entire dataset a correlation coefficient of 0.66 was calculated, leading to the conclusion that a significant positive correlation exists within the chosen timeframes between gun sales and gun mortality rates. While the numeric correlation is modest, the nuanced nature of this relationship requires a comprehensive understanding of the multifaceted elements influencing the dynamics between firearms and fatalities.
Page updated
Google Sites
Report abuse