出刊年月/Date of Publishing
2011.09
所屬卷期/Vol. & No. 第41卷第3期 Vol. 41, No. 3
類型/Type 研究論文 Research Article
出刊年月/Date of Publishing
2011.09
所屬卷期/Vol. & No. 第41卷第3期 Vol. 41, No. 3
類型/Type 研究論文 Research Article
篇名/Title
從歐洲人權法院Storck 及Buck 判決看其對德國法院之衝擊——私生活及住家隱私權之論辯
How the European Court of Human Rights’ Storck and Buck Judgments Impact German Courts: Debates on the Protection of Private Life and Home
作者/Author
廖福特 Fort Fu-Te Liao
頁碼/Pagination
pp. 763-799
摘要
本文藉由分析Storck v. Germany 及Buck v. Germany 兩個案件,以探究私生活及住家隱私權之內涵及歐洲人權法院判決在此領域對德國法院之衝擊。本文對於歐洲人權法院在Storck案認定1981年之安置沒有侵犯當事人私生活權利,表示無法完全贊同。對於兩案中其他判決內容,本文認為正是權利保護者之積極呈現。但是本文亦認為,有關履行判決,當事人不必然得到完整之金錢賠償,甚至個案再次回到國內救濟都有困難。而歐洲人權法院之判決可能引導國內法律之修改,或是促使更加細密地適用法律。
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to provide a brief account of the legal regime governing the prohibition of age discrimination in employment in the Untied States. It examines in three stages in the development of that legal regime, taking account of thirty related decisions rendered by the U.S. Supreme Court over the past forty years, assessing the controversies resolved and issues as yet unresolved. The paper is divided into five sections. Section One discusses the background information, legislative history, important provisions, subsequent amendments, and the enforcement mechanism of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) of 1967. Section Two examines twelve cases ruled on by the Supreme Court from 1976 to 1985 to discuss the controversies it settled. Section Three evaluates twelve cases from 1989 to 1998. Section Four looks into eight cases rendered by the Court from 2000 to 2008. Section Five makes a general assessment of the impact of these decisions on the development of the American legal regime. Finally, the paper evaluates whether the American experience in this field can provide any guidance for Taiwan given its recent efforts to establish a similar legal system to combat age discrimination in employment.
關鍵字/Key Word
私生活、住家隱私權、歐洲人權法院、Storck v. Germany、Buck v. Germany
private life, right to respect for his home, European Court of Human Rights, Storck v. Germany, Buck v. Germany
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7015/JEAS.201109.0763
學門分類/Subject
法學 Law