出刊年月/Date of Publishing
2020.06
所屬卷期/Vol. & No. 第50卷第2期 Vol. 50, No. 2
類型/Type 研究論文 Research Article
出刊年月/Date of Publishing
2020.06
所屬卷期/Vol. & No. 第50卷第2期 Vol. 50, No. 2
類型/Type 研究論文 Research Article
篇名/Title
初探目的解釋在法律人工智慧系統之運用可能
No Vehicles in the Park?: On AI’s Teleological Interpretation in Law
作者/Author
陳弘儒 Hung-Ju Chen
頁碼/Pagination
pp. 293-347
摘要
本文說明法律推理的計算機模型在設計上的可能困境。文章指出,在目的被給定的條件下,雖然可能運用CMLRs進行目的推論,但仍舊無法消除規範性的質疑,因為有限範圍之目的推論是對於未來可能結果之預測,因此,可能世界如何與目的之規範事態相符合是一個關鍵問題。此外,本文直視「目的如何具有規範性」的議題,並指出法律推理的不確定性。在實踐層面,則透過「目的」之概念分析為CMLRs提供哲學反省,釐清其運用界線以及邊界問題。
Abstract
Legal purposes not only contribute to the meaning of legal norms but also help lawyers arrive at legal conclusions, and even provide justificatory force. Engineers in Artificial Intelligence and Law also recognize the importance of teleological reasoning in law and aim at building a computational model capable of teleological interpretation, no matter in models of statutory reasoning or case-based reasoning. This paper investigates the problem of teleological interpretation in CMLRs. It points out that CMLRs are capable of operating teleological reasoning within a limited scope but incompetent to deal with normative issues such as why certain values shall be realized through a teleological interpretation. This is because CMLRs in a purposive interpretation function to predict future possible outcomes, but it is another (fundamental) question regarding how this presupposed possible world fits into the normative state of affairs of a legal purpose. This article makes two contributions. First, it directly focuses on the form and structure of purposive interpretation providing analysis and reflections on its applicative problem in CMLRs. Second, it clarifies the relationship between a legal purpose and meaning of a legal norm. This clarification helps CMLRs to understand to what extent a model design of teleological interpretation is acceptable.
關鍵字/Key Word
人工智慧與法律、目的解釋、法律推理的電腦模型、規範性、工具理性
artificial intelligence and law, teleological interpretation, computational models of legal reasoning, normativity, instrumental rationality
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7015/JEAS.202006_50(2).0006
學門分類/Subject
法學 Jurisprudence