出刊年月/Date of Publishing

1999.06

所屬卷期/Vol. & No.   第29卷第2期 Vol. 29, No. 2

類型/Type                 研究論文 Research Article

篇名/Title
融會在玉米田裡的「非男性」科學——關於「女性」科學的哲學論爭與新發展
A Feeling for Corn Field in Keller’s “Non-Masculine” Science

作者/Author
傅大為 Daiwie Fu

頁碼/Pagination
pp. 1-40

摘要
本文分成幾個部分：一、從生物學史中定位McClintock當年特殊的科學戚知，「非男性」科學的特色；二、討論女性主義者如Keller，還有Harding等人對「女性科學」的不同觀點，還有對McClintock科學研究的不同評價。三丶四兩節，我對Keller的名著——A Feeling for the Organism 作了一個仔鈿的語言／象徵／論述之分析，發現McClintock與自然的關係大概有四種模型，比Keller有點浪漫的「愛」的模型要榎雜很多，並且，McClintock與自然「融會」的科學，也沒有辦法避免傅科所指出的，在「機構中的研究者」如McClintock，與被研究者 (玉米) 彼此之間的權力宰制關係。畢竟，我們有的只是「部分」的非男性科學，而Harding對玉米田裡非男性科學的評價，值得我們進一步反省。

Abstract
This is a study of McClintock's science and feminist interpretations of it, viewed through the lens of Keller’s famous biographical study, A Feeling for the Organism. In addition to presenting a historically situated understanding of McClintock’s “non-masculine” science, as interpreted by Keller and questioned by Harding, I offer a detailed discursive analysis of Keller’s biography itself. What I found can be summerized into four different models of McClintock’s relations with nature (or with her research subjects), a picture more complicated than Keller’s own “eros” model. Moreover, my analysis reveals a special dimension of power relationship in the Foucauldian sense, between McClintock’s research team as a dominant institutional power, and her research subjects. I argue that McClintock’s science is, perhaps, a non-masculine science only in a partial sense. Further, this analysis also concurs with Harding’s reservations about the value of McClintock’s science as a paradigmatic feminist science.

關鍵字/Key Word
女性主義科學、男性科學、Keller、Harding、McClintock
feminist science, masculine science, Keller, Harding, McClintock

DOI
--

學門分類/Subject
史學 History