If you want a wired in-ear monitor with three balanced armature drivers and a neutral sound focus, choose Etymotic EVO Multi-Driver In-Ear; if you need a planar-magnetic design with a wider stated frequency range and both 3.5 mm and 4.4 mm plug options, choose Hidizs MP145. For fishing, I’d lean toward the Etymotic for its low-microphonics cable design, while neither is an open-ear or Bluetooth headset.
Etymotic EVO Multi-Driver In-Ear vs Hidizs MP145 at a Glance
• Hidizs MP145’s strength: A 14.5 mm planar-magnetic driver and a stated 20 Hz–40 kHz frequency range; its trade-off is that it is also wired, with no Bluetooth connection listed.
• Etymotic EVO’s cable is described as double-twisted and tangle-free, with very low microphonics; the MP145 includes a reinforced cable and two plug options.
• The Etymotic is for listeners who prioritize a neutral, precise in-ear presentation; the Hidizs is for listeners drawn to planar-driver design and flexible wired connections.
The EVO uses three balanced armature drivers: two for low frequencies and one for mids and treble. Its two-way crossover divides those jobs, and Etymotic describes the sound as tonally neutral and transparent. The stated frequency response is 20 Hz–16 kHz. Its listed impedance is 47 ohms, with sensitivity of 99 dB SPL at 0.1 V at 1 kHz.
That arrangement makes the EVO a plausible fit for someone who wants a wired monitor built around clearly separated driver roles rather than a single large planar driver. The supplied cable has a 3.5 mm angled plug and a T2 connector. The cable is described as double-twisted, tangle-free, and very low in microphonics—a detail that matters when movement might otherwise transmit cable noise into the earpieces.
How We Research
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Updated: 2026-10-19 · 6 min read · Independent comparison
The MP145 pairs a 14.5 mm planar-magnetic driver with a stated frequency range of 20 Hz–40 kHz. Hidizs describes its tuning in terms of controlled bass, a transparent midrange, and extended treble. Those are manufacturer-described sound characteristics, not a guarantee that every listener will hear the same balance. The product also includes a 3.5 mm and a 4.4 mm plug option, giving it more wired-connection flexibility than the Etymotic’s listed 3.5 mm plug.
The MP145 may suit a listener curious about planar-magnetic IEMs or someone whose audio setup can use either of those plug types. Its supplied package information includes a protective case and eartips, while its cable is described as reinforced. The product is an in-ear monitor with passive noise control, not a wireless or open-ear headset.
That distinction matters on the water. If you are searching for the best open ear earbuds for fishing, neither of these is an open-ear choice. And if “noise canceling earbuds for fishing” means active electronic cancellation, the listed feature for both is passive noise control, not active noise cancellation. The MP145’s broader stated frequency range and planar driver may appeal for listening, but they do not make it a Bluetooth headset or an environmental-awareness product.
• Best fit for a neutral, multi-driver design → Etymotic EVO Multi-Driver In-Ear. It uses two low-frequency balanced armature drivers and a separate midrange/treble driver.
• Best fit if you specifically want a planar-magnetic IEM → Hidizs MP145. Its listed driver is a 14.5 mm planar magnetic driver.
• Best for a cable described as having very low microphonics → Etymotic EVO Multi-Driver In-Ear. That may be useful if cable movement is a concern, though neither product is wireless.
• Best for a choice of 3.5 mm or 4.4 mm plug options → Hidizs MP145. The Etymotic lists a 3.5 mm angled mini jack.
• Best for fishing when listening through wired IEMs is your plan → Etymotic EVO, narrowly. Its low-microphonics cable description is a practical advantage, but both models sit in the ear and use passive noise control.
• Best for someone looking for Bluetooth → Neither. The listed connectivity is wired for both, and Bluetooth is not listed for the MP145.
• Best for someone seeking open-ear listening → Neither. Both are in-ear monitors; neither is described as open-ear.
• Best for a wider stated frequency range → Hidizs MP145. Its listed range is 20 Hz–40 kHz, compared with 20 Hz–16 kHz for the EVO.
Fishing adds a use-case question that the driver specifications alone cannot answer: do you want to hear what is happening around you? Both products are in-ear models with passive noise control. That is different from open-ear listening, and neither spec sheet describes a transparency mode or active noise cancellation. If maintaining awareness of nearby sounds is a priority, these are not obvious substitutes for an open-ear design.
The sound-design choice is more straightforward. The EVO’s three balanced armatures and two-way crossover give it a clearly specified division between low frequencies and mids/treble. The MP145 centers on a large planar-magnetic driver and has the broader stated frequency range. Those are meaningful design differences, but a broader frequency specification by itself does not establish which one will sound better to you.
My Verdict
I would choose the Etymotic EVO Multi-Driver In-Ear for fishing if I wanted a wired in-ear monitor and valued its low-microphonics cable description. Its neutral, three-driver configuration is also the clearer match for my preference here. For the best open ear earbuds for fishing or a Bluetooth connection, I would choose neither: both are wired, passive-noise-control in-ear monitors.
No. Both are listed as wired products. The Etymotic includes a 3.5 mm angled plug, while the Hidizs lists 3.5 mm and 4.4 mm plug options.
In my opinion, the EVO has the more relevant feature for a wired fishing setup: its cable is described as having very low microphonics. Both are in-ear monitors with passive noise control, so neither is an open-ear option.
Neither product’s listed noise-control feature is active noise cancellation. Both are described as having passive noise control, so I would not treat either as an electronic noise-canceling headset.
No. The MP145’s listed range is 20 Hz–40 kHz, while the EVO’s is 20 Hz–16 kHz. Those figures describe stated frequency ranges; they do not, on their own, determine which sound presentation you will prefer.
• waterproof headphones for swimming ipx8
• SteelSeries Arctis Nova 3P vs Krysenix Gaming Headset
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.