Register to Vote Today!
by Mia de Castro
July 10, 2020
One of the most pressing environmental issues today is the mismanagement and overproduction of waste, which can ultimately be traced back to overconsumption. In this series, I hope to explore different industries’ impact on waste production (globally and in the US) and how we, as individuals, can make an impact through more environmentally-conscious decisions in our everyday lives.
Due to the rise of fast fashion, continually pushing consumers to “buy, buy, buy”, American women have triple the amount of outfits as women had in the 1930s (Forbes, 2015). Other consumption industries are also responsible for the colossal waste produced by Americans: food and drink (through the rise of single-use plastics/containers), cosmetics and personal products, and many other industries.
Today, however, I will begin by discussing American waste today. How has it changed over the years? What makes up the largest portion of American waste? Are the growing efforts to compost, to recycle, and to reuse enough? What are the environmental harms of mismanaged and/or colossal waste?
American waste can be broken down into several groups, as categorized by the EPA.
It might be surprising that plastics do not make up the largest category of waste in the US because they are so often talked about. Yet, it is critical to remember that plastics pose a much larger threat to the environment because of their lack of compostability, while paper and cardboard are easily recyclable/compostable and biodegradable.
It is also important to note that the above chart (EPA) only recognizes municipal solid waste (MSW), and does not include the large amount of waste that unfortunately reaches the ocean.
Luckily, a good portion of the US waste can be recycled, reused, or composted to cut down waste production. Textiles can be donated, yard trimmings, wood, and food can be composted, paper and paperboard can be composted or recycled, and plastics, metals, and glass can be recycled. It is evidently unrealistic to expect such a large and immediate elimination of waste, but it is important to remember that reducing waste is not impossible when further explored.
So is the average American doing enough?
Unfortunately, the US struggles heavily with waste management. As a large, developed country, we are bound to have high levels of consumption and thus high levels of waste, yet we should be taking more action to improve our habits.
Another graph from the EPA shows that we have implemented better waste practices, over the past few decades, to limit the amount of MSW. However, the overall waste production demonstrates a trend of continued growth and the tons of waste in the landfill have not diminished, but have actually grown.
Even though we have taken steps towards greener waste management, we are failing to do enough to compensate for growing consumption and its waste. An outstanding example of greener waste management is Sweden. The culture stresses a focus on the environment and thus implores, from a young age, to sort trash; Sweden hopes to be zero waste in the coming years (Global Citizen, 2016). In 2017, for example, Sweden recycled 34% of its waste while the US only recycled about 25% (Sopor.nu).
Mismanaged waste has countless pejorative environmental effects. Our oceans and other bodies of water are especially subject to the harms of trash as waste fails to be properly disposed of. Trash in bodies of water can alter light levels, thus damaging aquatic plants and potentially harming food chains, limit oxygen levels, thus limiting aquatic growth, and damage sensitive life, such as coral reefs. Moreover, plastic waste creates PBTs, or persistent, bioaccumulative toxic substances, that harm the health of wildlife and ultimately our own health as we consume seafood.
Even managed waste that ends up in the landfill is a poor option for waste management. Landfills create high levels of CO2 and methane gas, both of which are GHG (greenhouse gases) that are responsible for climate change. Additionally, toxic substances found in waste, such as mercury and arsenic, are absorbed into the ground. The lack of oxygen due to the compacted waste also prevents quick decomposition.
In the coming articles of this series, I hope to explore potential solutions to this problem, in addition to exploring the main causes of this large waste production.