One of the challenges facing commanders in a joint emergency response is how to collate the available information in order to make effective decisions collaboratively.
The JDM has been developed to enable efficient and effective joint working by the emergency services, helping to determine their priorities for action. The JDM achieves this through different stages that establish a shared situational awareness and a joint assessment of risk to inform decision-making.
All joint decisions must be made with the primary aim of saving lives and reducing harm. Reducing harm may relate to potential damage to people, the environment, property or infrastructure.
Emergency responders should have this uppermost in their minds when making any decision. The JDM is organised around three primary considerations – situation, direction and action.
The situation primary consideration involves answering the following questions:
Having situational awareness is having an appropriate knowledge of these factors.
The direction primary consideration involves answering the following questions:
The action primary consideration involves answering the following questions:
The JDM develops the three primary considerations and sets out the various stages of how joint decisions should be reached. All joint decisions must be made with the primary aim to save lives and reduce harm through a co-ordinated multi-agency response. Responders and commanders can use the JDM at the scene of an incident.
The pentagon at the centre of the JDM is a reminder to emergency services that all joint decisions must be made with the primary aim of saving lives and reducing harm. This is achieved through a co-ordinated and joint response.
This stage involves gathering and sharing information and intelligence, for example, through a METHANE message. Sharing information is essential in the handover to commanders. The purpose is to achieve a shared situational awareness. Social media can be a useful communications tool for organisations and commanders to use for gathering information, and for warning and informing the public. First responders and those outside of the command group must not use social media for sharing information about the incident.
Commanders use joint risk assessments to achieve a common understanding of threats, hazards and the likelihood of them being realised. This is done in order to make informed decisions on deployments and establish which risk control measures are required. The key steps to delivering an effective emergency response are:
This stage relates to any relevant laws, operating procedures or policies that may impact on the response plan and capabilities that are available to be deployed. For example, in relation to a road traffic collision, the operational commander has legal and statutory responsibilities.
There will almost always be more than one option to achieve the desired end state. Commanders and responders should work together to evaluate the options and contingencies available. Contingencies refer to events that may occur and the arrangements that are put in place to respond to them should they occur.
Building situational awareness, setting direction and evaluating options all lead to taking the actions that are judged to be the most effective and efficient to resolve the major or complex incident. It is essential that all actions are reviewed. The commanders and responders will revisit the JDM stages as information changes during the emergency response until the incident is resolved.