The English word "Quantum" in the Modern Arabic is given the name "Kam". This word is used by virtually all Arabic speaking people to communicate the English term "How much". On a piece of paper Quantum Mechanics in the Arabic language seems to be indicating something called "The Mechanics of the How Much", and that is not a good description of the most successful theory in all of the known knowledge. One could debate that perhaps I am just pronouncing it wrong. To that, I say -nonsense. There are only three modes of pronunciation in the Arabic model for a word, where "Kam" can also be "Kom" which means "sleeve", or "Kim" which seems to be communicating the name "Kim". Also, "The Big Bang" when translated into Arabic does not (at all) communicate the cosmic event talked about for decades now. The Arabic communication model is not mature enough to support the basics in scientific applications; the only books being read are ones that have been written way before the current understanding of things. I also previously talked with my readers about how there is no equivalent to the word "tolerant" in the Arabic language, but the idea can be communicated in a lengthy sentence. When one tries to translate "Tolerant" into Arabic, the person will get words that are already used by the common speaker to say "Forgiving" or "Permissive" only. After communicating all this information with people, some have asked me to take a closer look as well as the equivalence of the English terms "Be Civil", and "Give Credit", and after careful thoughtful examination, I found out there are no precise equivalents to both of these terms. If one attempts to say "Be Civilized" in Arabic, it will not be distinguishable from "Be (Technologically) Modernized" or "Be Up to Date". It is identical, thus almost impossible to tell what the specking-end of the conversation is talking about. As for "Give Credit" I assure you that there are no equivalents besides the banking term for the word.

This absence of some core conceptualizations could be the reason why there is a lack of interest in the sciences among some populations where it is replaced with an obsession with money. It could be the source of why research communities are rarer than a diamond in a coal mine in many of these countries that prioritize sexual, animalistic indulgences above everything else. And just maybe it's the cause behind the unnatural phenomenon of Terrorism since it has a foundational ideological base created through the teachings of only intolerance. The theology of the Islam teaches that all people (everywhere) must capitulate or risk being destroyed. This model worked in the complete destruction of the most advanced civilizations of antiquity, and one can make an undisputed deduction that mass liberal opposition to the ban is an indicator that the Left seeks to annihilate our identities, our way of life, and our governments. Identical to whom they support, but in a different evil mold. Well, why support any ban against people? The answer lies in the great work called The Open Society and Its Enemies by the philosopher, Karl R. Popper. Popper wrote in his book that "when we extend tolerance to those who are openly intolerant, the tolerant ones end up being destroyed and tolerance with them". And he continued: "as paradoxical as it may seem, defending tolerance requires to not tolerate the intolerant". So, think about it though for a second. There is a need for the opposite of the absent (basic yet very important) word for some strange reason, but no room for the word itself. One can conclude that the medium selected to communicate a new idea will determine if it will be understood properly or not. Or considered to be a good hard effort or just ramblings of an insane person. The capacity to understand concepts is reliant on the communication model used. This could be the language or the discipline used to explain a hypothesis. The airline industry assumes the stupidity of its customers by demonstrating on each flight how a belt buckle works. One would speculate that, perhaps, they want to accommodate time-travelers from ancient times. Unfortunately, this incivility of labeling people with ignorance is common practice in the business model today, and the corporate environment calls it "being user-friendly". In contrast, Philosophy ascertains the intelligence of its customers, therefore, will be chosen here as a vessel to communicate unexplored concepts made through heavy contemplation.

With that out of the way, let us look for some words of guidance to start this effort. I will highlight what I believe to be the most important concepts extracted. My father, General Hmood Dawi, once told me long ago a euphemism which said to always extend your legs to the edges of your blanket. When I asked for the meaning, it had an interesting extrapolation. And it was "Remember to do a plan, for all finances, for all conduct, and even in contributions to the very limitations of what you are capable of doing". And René Descartes wrote in his book Passions of Soul the following: "I shall be obliged to write just as if I was considering a topic that no one had dealt with before". Terence Mckenna asserted that: "Nature loves courage. You make the commitment and nature will respond to that commitment by removing impossible obstacles. Dream the impossible dream and the world will not grind you under, it will lift you up". Werner Heisenberg reported that: "Natural science, does not simply describe and explain nature; it is part of the interplay between nature and ourselves". And Max Born once mentioned the following: "I am now convinced that theoretical physics is actually philosophy. And John Nash once inquired: "What truly is logic? Who decides reason?" Edwin Abbott in a fictional narrative wrote: "Distress not yourself if you cannot at first understand the deeper mysteries of Space (Land). By degrees, they will dawn upon you". Eliphas Levi once wrote "Everything is possible to him who wills only what is true! Rest in Nature, study, know, then dare; dare to will, dare to act”. And George Orwell said in his book: "Happiness can only exist in acceptance". Erwin Schrödinger contributed with the following statement: "Consciousness cannot be accounted for in physical terms. For consciousness is absolutely fundamental". It cannot be accounted for in terms of anything else”. Carl Jung affirmed that: "In all chaos, there is a cosmos, in all disorder a secret order". And Stephen Hawking warned us that: "To confine our attention to terrestrial matters would be to limit the human spirit".

All these people are among my greatest heroes. Another thinker who must be included is a man that helped me reject many of my previous doctrinal, Islamo-ecclesiastical false beliefs. Manly P. Hall, and he once said the concluding quote below in a lecture I obtained from the Philosophical Research Society in Los Angeles. A community that he established in 1934. The first time I heard this lecture, gates to foreign concepts of what seems to be an alien source of some sorts, became open all of a sudden. Or at least that is what it felt like, to say the least. Nonetheless, I can only wish upon the skies that it does the same to the reader.

"Therefore the initiate ascending always finds in the end, Communion with the innermost. Communion with that which is the divine within himself or herself. The rulership of that which was the source and cause. And the only answer to all the questions of life. there's only one reality in each of us, and that is the divine power. And each in his own way must pay homage to that power. And each from his own struggles, his own labors, his own works, must build a temple which is to be the dwelling place of that one power. So each individual is building his own sanctuary through purification, through discipline, through service and through all those things which make life real. Now in our present day looking around, it doesn't look very much like it's getting along very well. There's nothing but problems. Nothing but sorrows. Nothing but difficulties. But, I think we notice, as I think we all notice, that in the last few years, these difficulties are beginning to create legitimate questions. They are the first step in the realization that these difficulties can never cease until we cure them. We have been waiting for something else to cure them. We have been waiting for the angels to come down and take away our misfortunes. We have tried to escape through everything from cursing to praying. But the problems still remain. And they will remain until we recognize the real answer."

Although the following hard research will be incorporated into "The Authentic Truth", a literary work of fiction, it will (also) be as real as a research effort can be. I need to take a break from fictional writing to focus on something more meaningful; something that will leave a trace of a thinking, contemplating, conscious man.

If you look at my twitter bio today, it says: "Researcher of Dark Energy in Astrophysics and Artificial Intelligence in Quantum Computing. I am a seeker of truth for the evolution of all life". And that is because out of all my work, I chose these topics to be displayed under my name for the world to see because these are what I am proud about these the most. And I love twitter because it's the only platform that allowed me to connect with the president of Amazon Arabia face-to-face through direct messaging. No joke, that actually happened recently since he was looking for people with Artificial Intelligence experience.

Today is a very special day because I am adding a fifth section, as my new twitter bio suggests and I will call it Quantum Artificial Intelligence. Of course I am adding this section today but I have been thinking about it for awhile. Specifically in finding the truth behind the possibility of an artificial intelligence entity acquiring consciousness through quantum computers. In other words, will quantum computing provide artificial intelligence entities with consciousness? I'm super excited about the latest addition to my research because currently the only people working on something similar are NASA and of course Google's research division, Google Research.