I was looking for a function in python which can shrink the labels. It is kind of like erosion but of each labelled region. Lets say I have two touching labels, 1 and 2 of two circles. Now I want to shrink both labels/erode pixels so that they do not touch each other by d number of pixels.
I am not quite sure I understand you correctly.
Do you want to shrink each label by n pixels ? Or do you want to shrink until touching labels are separated by at least n pixels and leave non-touching labels untouched?
In the latter case you could find gradients in the label image. Basically every pixel where the label value changes. Then dilate this line by n pixels and use it to mask out the labels.
Dvd Shrink Free Download 2010
tag_hash_104 🔥 https://cinurl.com/2yjYt4 🔥
@VolkerH
What I wanted is the former, shrink each label by n pixels, I thought of the brute force way too, just was thinking if I can do something along the lines of expand_labels implementation or if someone has some function like that one.
Hi all, one of our company assigned all items to all sites & vendors and the database grew to 100GB with just master records. I deleted around 70M records from table IV10200 but the DB file size didn't change. I read somewhere that I need to use DBCC SHRINKDATABASE to decrease the actual DB file size. Feels like this forum isn't the right place to ask this question but has anyone here tried shrinking their GP database? Thanks in advance and good day everyone!
"I would also recommend that after you shrink, you re-grow the files so that you have some free space. That way, when new rows come in, they don't trigger autogrowth. Autogrowth has a performance cost and is something you would like to avoid (through proper database sizing) whenever possible."
Restarting you SQL instance won't make a difference.. but you could effectively try to shrink your GP database by steps, not taking all the free space back in one shot, as this might leave your SQL server busy for quite some time..
However to keep the reply simple, for a "one off" shrink, to recover the space from this unusual event (creation and deleting the records), you will be fine shrinking the DB and files to recover the space.
I'm with Richard on this one. Since you said you removed some 70M records, the backup should be fairly reasonable when compressed and you could restore it into a test company and try the DBCC SHRINK command and see how much space you recovered. I would run re-index after the shrink and you should be fine after that.
There are pros and cons to shrinking SQL databases. The good side is that you do recover disk space but the down side is that you open your database to fragmentation. I would try doing this in a text environment first and then running some SQL tools to see how fragmented it becomes. I would also check out some SQL forums and ask the same question. You would get opinions from both sides.
Would there be an issue if i shrink a volume with existing data on it? Take for example I have a volume called A sized at 2TB which contains 1TB of data. Can I shrink the volume to 1.5TB without issues?
Now with that said, often the requirement for shrinking is to pull back space (i.e., in your case to pull back some of the 1TB of data that was over provisioned). The beauty with the Nimble arrays is that space actually isn't utilised as it's more than likely thin provisioned so there really is no detriment in keeping it that size as it won't really being used on the array.
I am trying to connect my laptop to a TV. I can't shrink the screen size using Intel Graphics Command Center as far as I have seen. I know I was able to do exactly that using the old Intel Graphics Control Panel. Is there any way to do this in Command Center, or is there another app (I don't care from who) that can shrink a display to match the corners correctly?
Your second suggestion also cannot be used as intel graphics control panel is no longer useable with the new intel graphics drivers. I know that screen shrinking is possible because of that program had a feature for it, but when I updated my computer new drivers were installed and I can't use the old program anymore.
Can anyone suggest how I can achieve this affect from Storyline itself? Or is there a quick easy way to convert my Storyline slide into PPT, apply the shrink effect and motion path and then re-import to Storyline?
This is an older post, did you get it resolved Emily?
I am working on a course now, with similar requirement, and found it quite easy.
Add an exit animation of shrink, along with a motion path. they will work together, and quite well actually.
After the shrink action, any aliases that pointed to the source index point tothe new shrunken index. If ILM performs the shrink action on a backingindex for a data stream, the shrunken index replaces the source index in thestream. You cannot perform the shrink action on a write index.
If the shrink action is used on a follower index, policyexecution waits until the leader index rolls over (or is otherwise marked complete), then converts the follower index into a regularindex with the unfollow action before performing the shrinkoperation.
The only workaround I've found for the shrinking problem is to use HFS+ (Journaled) instead of APFS. I accomplished that by creating a Sierra guest, then upgrading the guest to High Sierra with this command:
I had just used Fusion 10.1.2 to create a MacOS X 10.13.4 VM. I created this VM by upgrading an existing 10.12 VM. Part of the upgrade converts the files system from HPFS to APFS. The bad news is that the install vmware tools wouldn't shrink the drive. CarlinSmith's post came to the rescue.
The basic procedure is to zero out the the empty space from within the OS, and then to use the VMware Fusion host based utilities to defrag and then shrink the vmdk. It worked great. Click the helpful button on that guy's post.
I suspect it's related to the virtual volume for MacIntosh HD Data - haven't found a workaround yet, but it looks like we're stuck. You'll also want to make sure you delete local snapshots before shrinking too.
Haven't tried it, but I expect it'll have one side effect and temporarily expand the virtual disk to it's full size, so make sure you have enough disk space on the host to handle it (and the extra space for the shrink process).
The developers have purged a lot of data from a database and do not expect the database to ever grow to this size ever again. They are asking me to shrink the data files but since I know this is generally bad practice, due to potential performance issues, would it still be a bad idea in this case?
Generally, yes, you're right; shrinking is bad. If you have any Indexes on the database, they're liking to get fragmented; thus you'll end up having to rebuild them. (The whole thing isn't quite that simple, but that's just one reason).
If you're going to gain a lot of space when shrinking, and the database is unlikely to change, then it is (possibly) worth a consideration. Note, however, you're going to need to rebuild all of your indexes on that database. That's going to then use up more space, which will then end up as "free". I don't recommend then shrinking it again, as then you're back at stage B (fragmented indexes).
@tuanphan I was able to get it to shrink but it has a weird glitch where it goes to the right side of the page first. Can you help me figure out why?
site: -ng.squarespace.com
pw: sarah
This is the code I used:
The flex-shrink CSS property sets the flex shrink factor of a flex item. If the size of all flex items is larger than the flex container, items shrink to fit according to flex-shrink.
I bought Affinity Designer a few weeks ago and have been slowly but steadily learning to use it. It's a great app, and almost all my questions so far have been solved by a quick google search or searching these forums, but I've got one now that I just cannot figure out. I have a complex shape (Curve) that I want to duplicate and then shrink so that it forms a sort of border of uniform thickness around the inside of the original shape. A "normal" resize via the Transform panel throws all the proportions off.
I hope I'm explaining it properly. Is there a way to do this? In other apps I've used, it's been a matter of a Shrink menu command, and then inputting how much (usually in mm or pixels) I want it to shrink by. If such a menu item exists in A.D. I can't find it.
You can also use variant modifiers to target media queries like responsive breakpoints, dark mode, prefers-reduced-motion, and more. For example, use md:shrink-0 to apply the shrink-0 utility at only medium screen sizes and above.
"Hey, where'd my pores go?" - you after using this. And what is this exactly? An overnight treatment packed with a balanced blend of acids to shrink the look of pores and leave skin looking smooth & plump. The jelly-glaze texture wraps skin like a cozy blanket, sealing in acids and moisture deep while you sleep. Get it on and forget it, then rest easy knowing you'll wake up to skin that looks retexturized, renewed and brighter overnight and over time. Aaand, that's a wrap.
Allow the rectangle textbox to grow or shrink based on the text within the box. When creating data driven pages, I sometimes add long text to describe the data in the map. If I size the textbox for the longest text and the text shrinks for one of the maps, I'm left with a large blank space between the bottom of the text and the bottom border of the box.
Also, within a rectangle textbox, allow me to control the vertical justification of the text. Currently, it's only top justified. I'd like the ability to make it center or bottom justifiy.
Thank you.
Using the new technique, the researchers can create any shape and structure they want by patterning a polymer scaffold with a laser. After attaching other useful materials to the scaffold, they shrink it, generating structures one thousandth the volume of the original. 0852c4b9a8
mark knopfler get lucky free mp3 download
free download oxford hindi to english dictionary full version