A repositoryis where you store your code and make changes to it. Your changes are tracked with version control.Each project contains a repository.Create a repositoryTo create a repository, you can:Create a project orFork an existing project.Add files to a repositoryYou can add files to a repository:When you create a project.After you create a project, by using:The web editor.The UI.The command line.Add a file from the UIYou can upload a file from the GitLab UI.
When I try to clone a project from GitLab it says "Failed to authenticate".I typed my username and password correctly(I've tried it few times), configured my SSH key. I've tried my access token instead of my password and still unable to clone. I'm using HTTPS clone
Download Raw File From Gitlab
DOWNLOAD 🔥 https://urlin.us/2y3B2x 🔥
If you haven't read my article that details my issues with updating GitLab, i should probably let you know that i've been self hosting an instance for a while. But even apart from the problems with updating it, i also ran into some with just running GitLab day to day. For example, it has quite a few components included in the Omnibus install:
To be honest, it's probably a bit risky to use it for serious matters, unless you audit it in its entirety (which is actually not too hard to do because it's written in Python) and because of it not having been updated in a few years. But you know what they say: "If it's not broken, don't fix it." Certainly something that the people who did Google's UI redesign could have learnt from, if you ask me.
I'm new to JIRA, but now I have responsibility to lead bigger ongoing project which has complete issue, milestone, label, timing structure created in GitLab. Our company/department is using heavily gitlab-issues to track all our work.
I am aware of the plugins to integrate github and JIRA, the question is not about linking existing JIRA issues but about moving all the issues and all it's structure we currently have in gitlab to JIRA *and* then link those issues to their respective projects/code located in gitlab when needed.
There is no tool that would allow you to export everything from Gitlab and import it to Jira, the closest you can get is to export your issues in Gitlab to a csv file and then import that file to an existing project in Jira that has been configured to behave similar to what you currently have. Have a look at this thread, Import GitLab Issues into Jira, they created their own tool to do the migration since the csv export in Gitlab looks like it is not including comments. Once you migrated to Jira and integrated Gitlab you should be able to link issues to your code changes the same way you are doing it today.
We've migrated recently from an old GitLab installation to Jira Cloud including all projects, issues, states, links (converted to new issue keys), comments, fix versions (milestones) and attachments.
We did not find any tool that allowed us to control each value mapping to our needs, and therefore we built our own migration script that made use of GitLab's and Jira's REST APIs.
If you are interested in our solution, then reach out to me.
in my company there are multiple GIT solutions in place right now. We think about buying Bitbucket on a large scale and use it as the only solution but we have to consider how to migrate the projects from Gerrit, Gitlab, ... into Bitbucket.
I was searching in the Atlassian documentation and via google but the only thing I found was some guidelines or tool features on how to import the GIT repositories into Bitbucket from some other system like GitHub. I am missing the metadata import here.
Hi Martin, you can import the source code and history to Bitbucket Server as explained at Importing code from an existing project. However, you'll need to manually recreate all metadata such as permissions, comments, pull requests etc. either from the Bitbucket Server GUI or programmatically using the Bitbucket API. We have a feature request to make this process easier, and you can vote for it at BSERV-3555. All other data such as repo history is stored in the .git directory.
Each Gitlab Project contains a gitlab-ci.yml file that creates a pipeline with stages and jobs. Every commit that I make to the project will trigger the pipeline that is then picked up by a CI Runner (EC2). A project typically contains cloudformation templates and other resources.
Update: I tried to setup a new web service connected to a Gitlab repo, and Render had no issue querying the names of all my gitlab projects for that. (I did not follow through with setting the service up, I expect it to fail as well)
just being on a separate server does not sound like that big of an argument for migrating from gitlab auth so something else. Depending on your target backend you can do that with the platform command, though:
Hi! We are doing a similar thing to test out gitlab ci. I kind of hacked a working system together for this. I created a custom gitlab runner image from gitlab-runner that has docker, docker-compose and rancher-compose installed and they are running and registered with gitlab.
Our current pipeline is defined in 3 stages in .gitlab-ci.yml. The publish stage pushes the built images into the private repo, tagged propertly. The deploy stage is set to manual so if you push the button in Gitlab it runs the deployment phase for that version. The gozerthedeployer.sh script is just a wrapper around make that issues announcement of start and end and result to slack using curl posting to a webhook. In a previous version, the gozer script also just installed the compose tools that it needed in the runner if they were missing, which can avoid the need for a custom runner image.
If you add a RANCHER_URL, RANCHER_ACCESS_KEY and RANCHER_SECRET_KEY secret variables to your project, you just need to add a new stage to your .gitlab-ci.yml file to have it upgrade the service in Rancher:
Solution: change your experiment status to INACTIVE and then back to RUNNING and the pavlovia mirror will reflect your gitlab experiment repository. Same solution found in a similar query on this forum here: Changes pushed to gitlab but not to Pavlovia dashboard - #9 by jbreedlo. One thing not mentioned in this post that I have found to be the case: you need to make changes to your experiment repo locally and then commit them back to gitlab via git. When I try to update via the webIDE, edits inside of subfolders will not be reflected in the pavlovia mirror of your gitlab experiment repo.
Cloud Build enables you to create triggers to build fromrepositories hosted on GitLab, allowing you to execute builds in response to events such as commit pushes or merge requests associated with your GitLab repository.
What can you suggest as a best practice to register feeds hosted on Gitlab in NIPM?
As a work-around I plan to clone my feeds locally and sync them periodically from repo and register the feeds in NIPM with the local repo paths.
Thanks in advance!
Rahul Nirhale
Certified LabVIEW Developer
This walkthrough shows you how to migrate multiple repositories to AWS CodeCommit from GitLab and set up a CI/CD pipeline using AWS CodePipeline and AWS CodeBuild. Event notifications and pull requests are sent to Amazon Chime for project team member communication.
Thanks for answering.
Yes, I've looked into documentation and substitution part as well. As for tutorial, I've not looked into it yet.
But your answers are general and I'm not sure if you understand that what I'm asking is pretty specific: I have a push trigger web hook working well, so all general conditions are met; what is not working is using another MR web hook that should activate another MR trigger but activating push trigger instead.
Point is that on GitLab side both web hooks have different URLs and ( I assume that ) they should not activate wrong trigger.
So still question that I want to be asked: how to debug such problem. What I need is to catch on Builder side events related to this specific web hook request.
And again I've used both clone of push trigger and new trigger build from scratch. and having the same results.
Thanks for helping.
So per my understanding: payload of GCP Build Trigger differs from either GitLab or GitHub specs and I'm asking for reference to real spec. Is any public repository with trigger code available?
Many UFT One users manage their continuous integration through GitLab. Configuring GitLab to run UFT One tests as part of a CI pipeline takes just a few simple steps. This blog post, from Dorin Bogdan and Ioana Tarau in the UFT One R&D team, explains how you can configure your GitLab instance to run UFT One tests.
Before you can run the tests, you need a GitLab project that contains UFT tests, and FTToolsLauncher.exe. You can download FTToolsLauncher.exe from -FT-ToolsLauncher/releases/, by selecting the latest release. We recommend that you download version FTToolsLauncher_net48.exe.
In the following dialogue you need to provide your previous repository's clone URL, add a new name (or just use the one from GitLab), choose of you want to make the repo private or public and you are good to go.
I've gotten much better at adapting to new circumstances lately. In many cases you can achieve the same, or even better, result if you change your point of view. You'll explorer new approaches from which you might benefit. So this may be a little philosophical, but: with every downside, every problem you solve comes an, maybee unseen, upside.
Looking at it from a business point of view (my agency also moved to GitHub), GitHub workflows are sill not as powerful as GitLab. Things like organization wide actions aren't a thing, making it harder to keep your workflows DRY. |It is planned for Q4 2021, though. Some of our repos still live with GitLab because of this. I don't want to adjust multiple files by hand, so we are patiently waiting. 2351a5e196
download film armageddon sub indo