Download Elo Rating System App

LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) is the world's most widely used green building rating system. LEED certification provides a framework for healthy, highly efficient, and cost-saving green buildings, which offer environmental, social and governance benefits. LEED certification is a globally recognized symbol of sustainability achievement, and it is backed by an entire industry of committed organizations and individuals paving the way for market transformation.

LEED-certified buildings focus on occupant well-being, offering a healthier and more satisfying indoor space while addressing community and public health. The rating system focuses on strategies like banning smoking and reducing toxic exposure from materials to improve air quality. Active design and supporting the production of local, sustainable foods promote physical activity and healthy eating.

Download 🔥 https://fancli.com/2y3Ius 🔥

Rating Summaries are assigned to many physical games and provide more detailed information about the content in a game and its context. You can find rating summaries when you conduct a ratings search on this site or download our mobile app.

CMS created the Five-Star Quality Rating System to help consumers, their families, and caregivers compare nursing homes more easily and to help identify areas about which you may want to ask questions. The Nursing Home Care Compare web site features a quality rating system that gives each nursing home a rating of between 1 and 5 stars. Nursing homes with 5 stars are considered to have much above average quality and nursing homes with 1 star are considered to have quality much below average. There is one Overall 5-star rating for each nursing home, and separate ratings for health inspections, staffing and quality measures.

Caution: No rating system can address all of the important considerations that go into a decision about which nursing home may be best for a particular person. Examples include the extent to which specialty care is provided (such as specialized rehabilitation or dementia care) or how easy it will be for family members to visit. Visits can improve both the residents' quality of life and quality of care, it may be better to select a nursing home that is very close over one that may be, rated higher but far away. Consumers should therefore use the Web site together with other sources of information for the nursing homes (including a visit to the nursing home) and State or local organizations (such as local advocacy groups and the State Ombudsman program).

December 4, 2020

QSOG Memo QSO-21-06-NH, Updates to the Nursing Home Compare website and Five Star Quality Rating System, has been posted. This memo describes changes to the Rating System to be implemented in January 2021. Specifically CMS will resume calculating nursing homes Health Inspection and Quality Measure ratings on January 27, 2021.

The CRS uses a Class rating system that is similar to fire insurance rating to determine flood insurance premium reductions for residents. CRS Classes are rated from 9 to 1. Today, most communities enter the program at a CRS Class 9 or Class 8 rating, which entitles residents in Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHAs) to a 5% discount on their flood insurance premiums for a Class 9 or a 10% discount for Class 8. As a community engages in additional mitigation activities, its residents become eligible for increased NFIP policy premium discounts. Each CRS Class improvement produces a 5% greater discount on flood insurance premiums for properties in the SFHA.

A community accrues points to improve its CRS Class rating and receive increasingly higher discounts. Points are awarded for engaging in any of 19 creditable activities, organized under four categories:

Each year, the community must verify that it is continuing to perform the activities that are being credited by the CRS by submitting an annual recertification. In addition, a community can continue to improve its CRS Class rating by undertaking new mitigation and floodplain management activities that earn even more points.

The figures above include all institutions with a valid STARS report. Institutions awarded Reporter designation elected not to publish scoring information or pursue a rating. Visit Participant Reports to access all public reports.

Ratings are determined by the Classification and Ratings Administration (CARA), via a board comprised of an independent group of parents. Follow @FilmRatings on Twitter for daily updates on film ratings.

Established by Motion Picture Association in 1968, the rating system was created to help parents make informed viewing choices for their children.Learn the facts, history, and evolution behind more than 50 years of ratings.

We assign you a disability rating based on the severity of your disability. We express this rating as a percentage, representing how much your disability decreases your overall health and ability to function.

Tip: Look for your highest disability rating (or highest combined rating) in the left column, and your next lowest disability rating in the top row. Your combined rating is the number where the 2 intersect on the chart, rounded to the nearest 10%.

Then, we look across from the 50 in the left column and down from the 30 in the top row to find the number that appears where the left column and top row meet. This is the combined value of the 2 ratings.

If you have 2 disabilities

We round that combined value to the nearest 10% to find your combined disability rating. We round combined values ending in 1 to 4 down, and those ending in 5 to 9 up.

We recently developed an online application, the Washington Tool for Online Rating (WATOR), to support the Washington Wetland Rating System. The application is designed to assist users in completing the required figures and forms and to help generate more accurate and consistent ratings. It also helps with a more efficient review of project proposals and permitting.

Parallel to this effort, we've been working on Version 2 of the Washington Wetland Rating System for both eastern and western Washington. These are the annotated versions of the 2014 wetland rating system manuals. They incorporate comments and requests for clarification Ecology has received since the 2014 version was published.

Rating systems are designed to help agencies make decisions about standards for protecting wetlands, including buffers. There are two wetland rating system manuals: one for the west side of the state and one for east of the Cascade range.

Washington's wetlands vary widely in their functions and values. Some types are common while others are rare. Some are heavily disturbed while others are still relatively undisturbed. All, however, provide some valuable wetland functions and resources that are ecological, economic, recreational, or aesthetic.

To protect individual wetlands effectively, managers, planners, and citizens need tools to understand the resource value each wetland provides. The rating system was designed to differentiate between wetlands based on:

In 2014, we updated the Washington State Wetland Rating System for both eastern and western Washington. The 2014 publications marked the third update for the rating system for eastern Washington and the fourth update for western Washington since 1991.

Version 2 of the 2014 rating system for western Washington was published in July 2023. If you have any questions about how Version 2 of the 2014 wetland rating system may affect CAO or SMP updates, email Rick Mraz, Ecology's wetland policy lead.

The rating system doesn't replace a full assessment of wetland functions that may be necessary to plan and monitor a compensatory mitigation project.

The rating system shouldn't be used to estimate the changes in the functions of wetlands as a result of impacts or mitigation.

Eastern WashingtonEastern Washington, Version 1, October 2014, Publication #14-06-030Updated web page links (as of 6/13/2023)2014 Eastern Washington Rating Form, Version 1 (PDF)Western WashingtonWestern Washington, Version 2, July 2023, Publication #23-06-0092014 Western Washington Rating Form, Version 2 (PDF)Western Washington, Version 1, October 2014, Publication #14-06-029Updated web page links (as of 6/13/2023)2014 Western Washington Rating Form, Version 1 (PDF)WDFW Priority HabitatsWDFW Priority Habitats: The current definitions of WDFW priority habitats should be consulted to answer the habitat questions (the descriptions on the rating forms do not describe the priority habitats adequately). 2351a5e196