Installing Beyond Compare's .deb package will add the Scooter Software repository to your system, allowing automatic software updates. To prevent the repository from being added, create an empty /etc/default/bcompare file before installation of the .deb.
Beyond Compare 4.1 and newer require matching package and OS architecture (x86_64.rpm or i386.rpm). Beyond Compare 3 - 4.0.7 require the i386.rpm package on all versions of openSUSE (32-bit and 64-bit). Beyond Compare on OpenSUSE doesn't support SMB network drives due to a missing gvfs-smb dependency. When prompted for the missing dependency during RPM installtion, select option 2 to install without network drive support.
Download Bcompare For Ubuntu
Download File 🔥 https://bytlly.com/2yGc9M 🔥
This is the only install method that allows installation by non-root users. It is also appropriate for Linux distributions that don't support .deb or .rpm packages. This method requires manual installation of dependencies, so if your distribution supports .deb or .rpm, you should use those packages instead of .tar.gz.
One very important requirement for me is to compare several nearly-identical images and choose the sharpest one, so I have to be able to switch rapidly from one image to the next and back again when zoomed 100%.
Are there any tools that attempt to measure sharpness by observed edges? Most images should be quantifiable in that way and could sort similar ones. Datestamps would also be suggested - 10 shots within 2 secs have good chance of being the same, but 10 minutes apart, it's at least somewhat different.
It's probably easy to completely automate the discovery of substantially-similar images, but I don't think you can automate the actual culling, because, if the depth of field is shallow, one image could have the largest percentage of sharp pixels but not be the most desirable, because it's focused on the wrong thing(s).
Most of the programs I've tried (like the default "Image Viewer" on ubuntu) zoom instantly and pan smoothly. geeqie took 19 seconds to zoom a jpeg to 100% on my 2560x1600 monitor. The only option I could find in geeqie that seemed relevant was "zoom quality" dropdown, but none of the choices was noticeably faster than the default, which is bilinear.
But, if you want a super fast way to view and cull images, it's hard to beat, as the open source solutions I've tried have been "slow as molasses" in comparison when going through a lot of raw files. For that matter, most commercial products are very slow in comparison, too.
Corel doesn't call it the "World's Fastest Raw Converter and Photo Manager" for nothing, as is very fast, especially with multi-core CPUs, where performance almost doubles each time you double CPU cores. It's also written in a way that lets it do things like process images in the background and the same time your viewing/editing/rating photos without the usual performance hits you see with most products, thanks to very efficient use of multiple threads.
In some ways it's similar to Lightroom, only it's much faster, and it can work with both raw and jpeg files, even if you do not import them into a catalog first (like you'd need to to with Lightroom). But, importing them into a library/catalog gives you more features and benefits.
I help out with camera reviews from time to time for another digital camera site, and if I have thousands of photos to go through and need to narrow down my keepers for sample photos on a tight schedule, AfterShot Pro is my solution.
You can get a trial that works for 30 days without buying it. Then if you decide you want to purchase it, just enter in the license key info you'll get via e-mail and it will become a registered product.
Note that with AfterShot Pro, the same license key works with multiple operating systems. So, you can buy it once, then install it in both windows and linux on the same computer if you're setup in a dual boot config.
Again, it's super fast and you can easily zoom on a photo to see fine details, with photos side by side, 4 on a page, etc. so you can easily compare them. Or, use the magniying glass feature to examine fine detail in the photos you're comparing.
There are lots of ways to cull photos. Personally, I just click a star rating (one star, two stars, etc.) for images, then filter so that I only see the photos rated x stars or higher until have a set that is of the number of photos I want to keep. But there are other ways to do it, too (color coded labels, etc.) to determine keepers.
That's a long webinar (about an hour long). But, I'd suggest watching it so you get a better idea of what the product is capable of, versus trying to learn all of its features by yourself later (so that you will know what to look for, since it has a *lot* of features that can come in handy at streamlining your workflow). Most of what you're interested in is covered within the first 10 minutes though.
What Linux are you using? I think digiKam is getting more usable with non-KDE distros, but it used to be almost hopeless. It was this that made me switch to KDE (now Kubuntu). It had serious issues with dependencies, display (text boxes with light yellow over white - almost unreadable) and having to use out-of-date versions of digiKam. On Kubuntu it runs really well.
Not a PPA but it's available through the Software Updater in Ubuntu, and 'apt-get install digikam' works to get latest version. Last tried it two, maybe three weeks ago. The main problem I've encountered is that (as with all KDE-based software - even Kubuntu) it doesn't like the older iMac I'm using right now.
Yeah, as I just replied to newmikey, Kubuntu and all KDE-oriented software is a problem for my system. Mint works fine, while Ubuntu Unity and Gnome applications are rock solid, so I'm sticking with Ubuntu for now.
Certainly AferShot Pro is fast. I used it for a year or so, and even before it was bought by Corel when it was called Bibble. I'm sometimes tempted to upgrade since the upgrades on sale are quite cheap, but I've gotten comfortable with Geeqie for viewing and culling, RawTherapee for raw conversions and digiKam for DAM. One thing that made me switch to RawTherapee was the color, especially skin tones. It gives beautiful skin tones, much like what I used to get on Nikon Capture. At the time, AfterShot's skin tones seemed a bit too red and saturated. Mind you, that was a couple years ago with an older version, and there are probably settings that can match the colors of Capture and RawTherapee. I also like some of the other, more advanced features of RT, but that probably has a lot to do with being more familiar with it now.
But RT is not fast. If I'm processing a lot of files I use the batch feature by setting the parameters for each image, then starting the batch and do something else for a while as it takes a lot of processing power.
Certainly AferShot Pro is fast. I used it for a year or so, and even before it was bought by Corel when it was called Bibble. I'm sometimes tempted to upgrade since the upgrades on sale are quite cheap,
Yea... I upgraded from Bibble Pro to Aftershot Pro for virtually nothing after Corel bought Bibble Labs if memory serves. with upgrades to the newer 2.x cost being negligible, as they have sales on a very regular basis.
It looks like upgrades are around $39.99 right now. But they have even better discounts on a regular basis. When I click on the Upgrade Button from their Product Page, I see that Bibble Pro users are still eligible for the upgrade price, too.
It's the only commercial product I use with Linux (with the exception of a couple of software packages I managed to get at no charge, including Crossover from Codeweavers for running Windows apps in Linux; and a copy of Softmaker Office for Linux).
IOW, I got the other commercial products via deals of the day and similar for no cost. But I actually spent my own money for Corel AfterShot Pro, and consider it to be money well spent, as it saves a lot of time when trying to go through a lot of photos and narrow down keepers.
I also have AfterShot Pro installed in Windows on the same desktop, pointing at the same folders for images from either operating system (to prevent duplication of files, I use an NTFS partition for images that both Linux and Windows installs have access to). That's an advertised and supported feature, too (buy one license key, and use it for multiple installations of AfterShot Pro within different operating systems).
It is well worth what they want for it in my opinion, paying for itself in one weekend's worth of time savings when trying to go through thousands of photos to narrow down keepers on a tight schedule.
but I've gotten comfortable with Geeqie for viewing and culling, RawTherapee for raw conversions and digiKam for DAM. One thing that made me switch to RawTherapee was the color, especially skin tones. It gives beautiful skin tones, much like what I used to get on Nikon Capture. At the time, AfterShot's skin tones seemed a bit too red and saturated. Mind you, that was a couple years ago with an older version, and there are probably settings that can match the colors of Capture and RawTherapee. I also like some of the other, more advanced features of RT, but that probably has a lot to do with being more familiar with it now. 152ee80cbc
right girl wrong time mp3 download
audio quran with urdu translation kanzul iman free download