Download An Entire Google Drive

When setting up a share on entire drive in Windwos 2k3 I get a message "You have chosen to share an entire drive For security reasons, this is not recommended".I did a quick googling but could not find these mysterious security reasons.Does anyone know what are they?

Is this a security risk? Yes, and no. Depends on how secure the data on the disk needs to be. The main risk with shared drives is directly linked to every user who will access them. The more people who will access it, the bigger your risks will be. And remember: if your computer is connected straight to the Internet, almost everyone with an Internet connection might be able to access it. (Although this depends on your firewall settings.)

Download Zip 🔥 https://urlgoal.com/2y2Gox 🔥

The risk of sharing an entire drive is greater than sharing part of it for the simple fact you are exposing the entire drive. It comes down to the golden rule of reducing the surface area available for attack.

Use a tool that is meant for creating what you're wanting and stream it to google drive. Would be a LOT faster too as its one big file rather than MANY tiny ones. You can adjust the include/exclude to your liking as it is just 'tar'. It will also capture then permissions and links depending on the tar options.

It's no different than a copy except it doesn't know the entire file length up front. It's chunked I believe and each chunk is verified. What isn't verified is the streamed data from tar but tar should error if there is an issue. But let's all realize this isn't a 'backup'.

iwanted to upgrade my windows but didn't want to format my data drive coz it's huge and i couldn't transfer to external HD so i formatted the windows drive and installed new version of windows and now i can't open any of the files on the data drive and iam denied access , i tried to fix this by changing the owner in the security tab inside properties but this is very time consujing coz i have thousands of files as i am a university proffessors in all formats

I'm trying to run a simple backup (mirror) of one entire drive (d:) to another drive (k:). I've created a .bat file ('backup.bat') defining the source (d:) and destination (k:) and placed this batch file within a folder on the d drive (d:\temp). When I double-click on the batch file it defines the source as d:\temp, instead of what I've defined it as in the batch file; d:.

Source: I did the exact same thing a year back and it renders the system entirely unusable. In my case, the process completed without any error, but when you boot, Windows doesn't create a mechanism to properly decompress the data and boot fails. You can compress other folders but leave out Windows and Program files at the least.

That's because data will be written to the very beginning of the drive while it is part of the RAID group. The system will then try to interpret that data as a partition table on boot when inspecting devices.

When I try to encrypt my laptop using TrueCrypt, it wants me to create a rescue disk and verify it. However, the laptop does not have a CD drive or a DVD drive, and I don't own something that can be connected to it. So, how do I proceed?

If it's Windows, grab Microsoft's Virtual CD-ROM Control Panel. Run it as Administrator, install the driver, add a new virtual drive, and load TrueCrypt's rescue disc image on it. The .iso should be somewhere in %ProgramFiles%\TrueCrypt\

In order to proceed without burning the rescue disk, you need to start the "Truecrypt Format" with the "/noisocheck" or "/n" flag. After the image is created, you can then save it to any folder on your drive, and later on burn it on a USB-drive, as mention in other posts.

Do not verify thatTrueCrypt Rescue Disks are correctlyburned. This can be useful e.g. incorporate environments where it may bemore convenient to maintain a centralrepository of ISO images rather than arepository of CDs or DVDs. WARNING:Never attempt to use this option tofacilitate the reuse of a previouslycreated TrueCrypt Rescue Disk. Notethat every time you encrypt a systempartition/drive, you must create a newTrueCrypt Rescue Disk even if you usethe same password. A previouslycreated TrueCrypt Rescue Disk cannotbe reused because it was created for adifferent master key.

The easiest way to to encrypt an entire partition with TrueCrypt without burning a cd is to install a virtual drive like Magic Disc (FREE). When the file is saved on your local computer simply mount the image as a cd and that will allow TrueCrypt to continue with actually burning a physical CD.

So, you mean the shared with user now can access the entire OneDrive folder? What does the experience look like! Is the correct folder shown in the mail and in the "shared with me"/"shared by me"" folder in the users OneDrive webclient?

Essentially, you select to share a file or folder and while the details pop up is open, you unselect the file -- and then click "share". Instead of sharing a file/folder, you're sharing the entire document library.

I am trying to set an entire hard drive as a share using Samba on our server running Ubuntu Desktop 16.04. I have been able to successfully set up a shared folder, but I am having problems setting up the drive.

I deleted the Share2 info from my smb.conf file and then set up the hard drive as a share using the Samba GUI (system-config-samba), what follows is the information it placed in the smb.conf file for the share:

If instead of fully encrypting the hard drive or encrypting the partition on which Windows is installed, I just encrypt a partition where I store my sensitive information, will it increase the chances of my data getting stolen(in comparison to the other alternatives) if my device gets stolen?

One benefit of encrypting only a partition vs the whole drive is that you can encrypt/decrypt the partition while using the system for other tasks, so you can encrypt it "on demand" so to say, but if you encrypt the whole disk it's decrypted every time you start up and authenticate the system.

Without having more information on the application, FDE is always the safest bet. However, for less critical data and unsophisticated attackers, an encrypted partition or virtual hard drive is probably enough.

The problem is that when you leave the Windows partition unencrypted, then you will also have an unencrypted pagefile (where Windows stores application memory when running out of RAM) and hibernation file (where Windows dumps the RAM when hibernating). When you are working with confidential data stored on your encrypted hard drive, then their content might end up in these files.

There are also other places on the system drive where confidential data might show up (depending on what information you consider confidential, of course). One thing I would always want to be encrypted is the C:\Users directory, because all kinds of applications use it to store temporary (and not so temporary) files. Whenever you view or edit a confidential file, the software you use for viewing might store information about that file in your user directory. When you are sure that you will only use programs to work with confidential files where you know that they won't ever do this, then this might not be a concern. But are you sure about this?

My 2019 iMac had unknown problems that slowed it down severely. I decided to do a clean install of Ventura using a bootable USB memory stick. During the process I erased the internal drive. This is supposed to check the drive and repair any faults and seemed to work.

My NAS currently has five 2TB drives and I want to replace them with three 4TB drives. What is the easiest and most reliable way to do this? I already have a 4TB parity drive and the NAS is about 2/3 full.

Assuming that your NAS is full and you can't add any new empty drives you're only real option is to move as much data as you can off 1 or 2 of your existing drives onto the other drives, consolodate to as few existing drives that you can.

Then follow the Shrink Array procedure from the Unraid docs. There is a couple ways to do this, but in your case (small capacity drives) the easiest would be to move the data on the drives to be removed to the new 4TB drives, remove/uninstall the drives from the array, and rebuild parity.

Some of my current drives are still Reiser FS. I would like to change them to XFS during this swap. If the removed 2TB RFS drive is replaced with a 4TB drive and rebuilt, it would retain the file system, correct? Any way around this? Or will this be two independent processes?

I don't have first hand experience with switching from ReiserFS to XFS, I came to Unraid after XFS was the default. I did recently upgrade my 6TB drives to 16TB, and shrank my array. So confident in my answers for that part.

My feeling is that as long as you change the Disk Setting File system type: from the default "auto" to "XFS" before formatting the drive (checking the format box at starting the array, after assigning the new drive) it *should* format to XFS and rebuild. (Data is data). But I will defer to @JorgeB or one of the true Unraid gurus to confirm if I'm correct.

Of course, swapping one XFS drive for another should definitely not be an issue. I would still manually set File system type: to XFS anyway. That's my common practice.

One last question. I have precleared all three of my 4TB drives so I am ready to make the swaps. I am going to remove one 2TB XFS drive and replace it with a precleared 4TB drive and then rebuild the array. The question is, when the rebuild is done, will the 4TB drive have 4TB of storage or 2TB since the old one was that size? Does the rebuild replicate the capacity also? ff782bc1db