Of course, banks do far more than just real estate loans. They're going to give loans to the person that wants to open a car dealership, to the doctor that wants to open a practice, and to the businessman that wants to open another McDonalds franchise. In theory, the bank could be in the business of managing a car lot and a medical practice and a fast food restaurant in addition to renting out apartments. But it is terribly unlikely that it would be good at all these things.
Practically, if a bank decided to get into one or all of these businesses, they would almost certainly encounter legal troubles. If the government is going to insure bank deposits (which is close to universal), they're going to want to ensure that banks remain solvent. If banks started running a bunch of businesses rather than just making loans, there would be a large risk that some banks would run their businesses badly and lose those deposits meaning that the government would have to bail them out. That's very different from a rental company that can go bankrupt if it mismanages its business and only lose the money that investors have risked. It also puts the bank at an unfair competitive position-- they're running the business with money the government guarantees while a regular apartment rental company is running the business with money that the investors are risking. I can't say that every country already has laws that prevent banks from operating businesses like this. If a bank decided to try to get into a business like this, though, and a country didn't have an existing law, it would almost assuredly pass such a law.
But other banks and banking groups may be tempted to follow the lead taken by Lloyds, John Lewis and Boots in entering the private rented sector, which continues to grow in size as people increasingly rent for the long-term.
For now, Lloyds Banking Group is the only major lender to enter the rental market, but it will be interesting to see if others follow suit in the coming months and years, depending on how well things go for Lloyds, and whether there will be a long-term shift from banks away from mortgages to other forms of income.
House prices also tend to rise if more people are able to borrow money to buy houses. The more lending banks and building societies are willing to provide, the more people can buy a house and prices will rise.
The fact is, the bank doesn't want your house. What they want is for you to pay your mortgage, and if they can help you do that, many lenders will. True, many lenders right now are in bad shape themselves. The housing sector and housing finance are in a huge mess, many people are losing their homes, and many banks are unable or unwilling to work with homeowners to save their mortgages.
But most banks will at least try to help homeowners if they believe they can save the mortgage and continue to receive payments on the loan. You may think your bank is not interested in helping you. And banks are not in the business of just helping people for no gain. But they are also not in the business of owning and selling real estate.
Many people don't think about this, and assume the bank will repossess the home, because we hear about this happening and we just come to believe that banks repossess homes. It's true that people lose their homes to foreclosure. It's more true and more common right now than it has been in recent years.
Foreclosures are extremely costly to banks. They do not make money when they take over your home and sell it in foreclosure. In fact, they usually lose quite a lot of money. Banks do not specialize in owning and selling distressed properties. They specialize in making loans and earning interest on those loans. If you lose your home, they make money.
Of course, banks do foreclose, and they do own and resell distressed property. Not every loan is "salvageable" in the lender's eyes. But the lender has to make that decision. If you try to make it for them, you will lose your home. Talking to your lender may save your home.
Conventional loans, also known as mortgage loans, are available to taxpayers through private lenders like credit unions, banks, etc. But can I get a conventional mortgage if I owe back taxes? You can get a conventional loan with an IRS payment plan from certain lending institutions, even if you owe taxes.
The short answer to your first question is no, banks are not in the business of buying houses from their mortgage loan customers. In fact, if a bank owns a house it is highly motivated to sell the property as quickly as possible because banks are not in the business of buying and selling real estate. Banks make a profit on lending people and businesses money, and generally lose money anytime they get their hands on property. If you call your bank and tell them you want to sell it your house, the customer service representative will probably not know what to say other than, "No."
Houses that have been red tagged often have a lien or a cloud on title. This can make make it very difficult for buyers to obtain financing. Most banks and lenders will not lend on a home that is not safe to occupy or has significant repairs. If you have a red tagged house, your option may be a cash buyer. Cash buyers do not depend upon bank financing and often buy houses as is.
Commercial lenders (banks) offer a range of mortgage rates and products.Before starting to look for a home, you should check with potential lenders toget a statement of how much they are prepared to lend you. This is calledapproval in principle. Getting approval in principle will indicatewhat price range you can consider when looking for somewhere to buy.
USDA loans are backed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and are for homes in eligible rural areas. There are two main types of USDA mortgages. Direct loans are funded by the USDA, while guaranteed loans are funded by private banks and insured by the USDA.
 38c6e68cf9