Debian Linux [UPD]

The 3.1 Sarge release was made in June 2005. This release updated 73% of the software and included over 9,000 new packages. A new installer with a modular design, Debian-Installer, allowed installations with RAID, XFS and LVM support, improved hardware detection, made installations easier for novice users, and was translated into almost forty languages. An installation manual and release notes were in ten and fifteen languages respectively. The efforts of Skolelinux, Debian-Med and Debian-Accessibility raised the number of packages that were educational, had a medical affiliation, and ones made for people with disabilities.[21][54]

I suppose myself and presumably other users of Debian ... would be interested to know if this procedure or workaround is documented anywhere?

(Edit

Removed reference to Mint, because per post under Mint may be unaffected by this issue. )

The current subject line for this post is

"Bug? latest desktop version install on linux"

I have edited that to

Bug? latest desktop version install on Debian linux (Joplin not starting)

It may not read as well and is longer, but more informative

Debian Linux

Download Zip 🔥 https://urluso.com/2y4I6y 🔥

However, in the tutorial I'm following it says I should navigate to the line that starts with "kernel", but as you can see, I dont have this line.So I tried changing "quiet" to "single" on the line that starts with "linux /boot/vmlinuz...." but this doesn't boots the system into single-user mode.

On linux there is still the CLI urbackupclientctl browse and urbackupclientctl restore-start who does it pretty well. One of my user complained that he could not see a list of files contained in a backup while using the command line. Would that be possible to do or the re-work is just too big to consider this new feature ?

In general, the Arch binaries are "simpler" (build to be as light as possible as per the Archlinux KISS principle). Debian tends to include more patches/build options in it's binaries to increase stability.

I used Debian for quite a while before moving to Arch. At one point (about two years ago) my main every-day OS was a debian core install with Debian Testing that I had built from the ground up and customized to my taste, much like an arch install. I remember that at the time I was impressed with how fast it was compared to Ubuntu, which I had used before moving to Debian. Out of curiosity and willingness to try something else, I eventually moved to Arch and do not remember noticing a significant speed increase (on the same crappy Compaq CQ50 laptop). What I did notice was that arch had better documentation, which made customization of the system from the ground up much easier. Other than that, I believe debian is just as good a distro (if you do only the core install, like masteryod said, because installing it with the DE's gets you a bunch of crap). And it's not that it had particularly bad documentation either, only that the arch wiki is... better.

An enormous speed increase was the first thing I noticed after moving from Ubuntu to Arch.

Best and easiest comparison was just to open up a terminal. In arch linux it simply appears

almost instantly. With ubuntu you can see it gradually build up.

I think that any distro can be made, rather easily, to be as fast as any other. My own suggestion is to stop comparing distros. Pick one on the basis of package availability, or package manager, or installer, or development model, or dev team size and quality, or testing policies, or release model, and figure out how to control and optimize it. e.g. Debian and Ubuntu have more packages in their collections than Archlinux does, but by golly Archlinux has a few things in its AUR that they don't have and that are important to me: e.g. firefox-kde-opensuse and the takeoff launcher for kde. Debian/Ubuntu have a huge developer team with great qualifications, but the Archlinux team is expert at rolling in updated packages into a pre-existing system with minimal breakage. The other guys don't even try that. So I see huge differences in the development teams and the development models but I don't see why there should be any real difference in performance of the final system.

So true. I always try to find the build config for various software and both distros are almost identical.

I practically find no difference between Arch and debian (unstable + Testing).

booting and applications startup are identical too.

In Arch you add services you need and debian you have to stop some if you dont want to. Not really a big difference.

Package quality is almost the same when you take official arch repos. But AUR is definitely not upto the debian quality.

Other than that, I can't find any difference.

Debian wiki is bit cluttered, but sure you can find the info somehow or somewhere.

Arch forum is definitely way better than any linux forums I have ever seen. That's a big plus.

I've done my own tests as well comparing Arch to debian and Gentoo. I did a minimal install with xorg, drivers, and e17. Shared the exact same kernel between Arch and Gentoo. I mean the kernel (vanilla 3.7.5) was actually shared, so a fair test to be sure! I hope its okay that I mention Gentoo. I thought some people might be interested in hearing this...

Is the expansion card known to work with linux?

Im in a little over my head on this one. My desktop ran debian for years with dual monitors, but that was through the graphics card that had dual out.

My research has lead me to believe that usb c to hdmi involves a converter chip in the dongle that requires a driver. Theres a company that sells dongles called displaylink that has linux drivers available, but I dont have that brand. I dont know. Im guessing a little. My dongles both work on my android tablet, which would suggest a driver exists somehwere. Displayport seems to be a much more native usb c spec. Its probably time to upgrade.

for a in arm64 armel armhf i386 ppc64el s390x; do dpkg --add-architecture $a; done

apt update

apt install rust-all libstd-rust-dev:{arm64,armel,armhf,i386,ppc64el,s390x} gcc-{aarch64,i686,powerpc64le,s390x}-linux-gnu gcc-arm-linux-gnueabi{,hf} qemu-user

I had to make a fresh instalation of my debian 12.

After that i installed Seafile-gui without issues, and it worked fine! Suddenly it stop showing the GUI on my tray icon. When i tried to start the GUI, it says that is already running.

Hi again!

I tested in a virtual machine on debian 12, and seafile worked without issue.

I think i will try to remove/delete everything that i have on my laptop related to seafile and try to re-install. Idk.

If you for example run ssh on port 8822, open this port on your firewall (and on the linux host if you are running a firewall there), you should be able to connect using ssh @ -p 8822. That is of course if your provider is not blocking any ports.

The default branch holds packaging sources for the currentmainline version, while stable-* branches contain latestsources for stable releases.To build binary packages, run make indebian/ directory on Debian/Ubuntu, or inrpm/SPECS/ on RHEL and derivatives, SLES, and Amazon Linux, or inalpine/ on Alpine.

I'm new to a lot of things. New to the forum, new to linux. However, I've been installing and using ESET antivirus products for years now. What i'm trying to accomplish is to install ESET NOD32 onto a linux computer. I have researched and found a file called eset_nod32av_32bit_en.linux

Go to Windows machine and type \\debianpcname\ and you should see your shared folder there and should be able to access it - you might be prompted for debian credentials to access the folder - don't forget as username to type the debian pc name before it e24fc04721