Okay, so I love my desktop version. Its simple. Its clean. Its easy to navigate. I will likely add more to my homepage eventually, but for now, I like it just the way it is. However, the mobile version, not so much!
1. The image banner. LOVE it on the desktop. But not so much on a mobile version. I have set to stack so it will be the image then the text under it (instead of text over the image like on the desktop version.) I want the background to be white. But the text is white. So when you go on the mobile site, you wont be able to see the text because both the background and text is white. Is there a solution to this?
Dawn Of Man Mobile
Download File 🔥 https://cinurl.com/2y7XTG 🔥
2. Image with text section. Again, LOVE it on my desktop version. But it looks weird on the mobile version. I want the image to be bigger and I want it to be from one side of the screen to the other side. I dont want any white on the sides of the image. Kinda like the Image Banner. It stretches from one side to the next. Any solution to this?
Hi There! Thank you so much! That worked like a charm. One last question. How do I make the buttons with the image banner black with white text on mobile? Just like earlier, I don't want to change the buttons on the desktop view, only on the mobile view. Thanks so much!
Hi! Thanks for providing a solution, but the odd thing for me is that when I use 800x800 for mobile banner, the quality comes out awful. But I have seen multiple places that 800x800 is the recommended size for mobile banner using the DAWN theme, but I am stuck as this does not work for me, any solutions?
I had an epiphany. I am using the ShineOn app, which creates a distinct product page and a distinct checkout page. I uninstalled the app and used the Shopify default product, cart and checkout pages. It works on mobile. So, the problem is with the ShineOn app. I will reach out to them.
Well. Darn it. It has reared its ugly head again. Can't get past the "Proceed to Checkout" on anything while on mobile. I actually found the string of code discussed by Aashish_Bhatt. It was in cart.shineon.liquid. I made the recommended changes and it hasn't worked. So, I am back to square one.
Project DAWN has partnered with the ADAMHS Board to install Emergency Naloxone Cabinets throughout the county for rapid access to opioid reversal.
We are currently exploring additional mobile sites throughout Cuyahoga County in order to address increasing areas of need.
Approximately one year after investigating Eastern Dawn, Lampi resigned from the district attorney's office and took a job with Donald B. McCoy and Associates. During this one year period, numerous complaints against Eastern Dawn similar to those previously lodged with the Bucks County officials were filed with the State Bureau of Consumer Protection. Pursuant to those complaints, the Bureau investigated the practices of the owners and operators of Eastern Dawn and of Weisser Mobile Homes, Inc. As a result of that investigation, the Bureau filed a complaint alleging all appellants were engaging in practices which prevented residents of Eastern Dawn from selling their mobile homes.
I believe DR 9-101(B) clearly would prohibit Lampi from representing appellants in the instant case. While a public prosecutor, Lampi was responsible for investigating complaints against Eastern Dawn. Further, Lampi effectuated a compromise with Eastern Dawn whereby Eastern Dawn agreed to certain practices which would allegedly make it easier for residents of the trailer park to sell their mobile homes. After effectuating the compromise, Lampi issued a formal report finding that Eastern Dawn did not violate the Mobile Home Park Rights Act. Thus, by now attempting to represent appellants in a matter almost identical to that which he investigated while a public employee, Lampi would be accepting private employment on a matter in which he had substantial responsibility as a public employee, thereby violating the mandate of DR 9-101(B).
A reading of the record in the light most favorable to the Bureau's version of the facts, with the most sensitive and revealing microscope, and an application of the very highest professional ethical standards, reveals not the slightest trace, taint, or even suggestion of a possible appearance of improper conduct. In its "test case" against McCoy, the Bureau claims, and the opinion in support of affirmance agrees, that McCoy must be disqualified solely because McCoy hired John Lampi, Esquire, some time before the Bureau began to investigate complaints that appellants were not complying with mobile home park laws. But Lampi in no respect was acquainted with the present charges against appellants. Rather, Lampi, a former deputy district attorney of Bucks County, "investigated" past complaints, filed over a year before the present claims, against only one of the appellants, Eastern Dawn. Indeed, Lampi "investigated" by following the directions of his supervisor, an assistant district attorney, who was still further responsible to the District Attorney himself. And in any event Lampi carefully has avoided any involvement in the present representation of appellants on the present charges.
There have been several instances in Mobile where no-knock warrants and pre-dawn raids have turned deadly. The most recent pre-dawn raid resulted in the death of a teen. At the time of the raid, MPD was investigating marijuana distribution in the home and executed a search warrant for 18-year-old DeAngelo Adjessom, who wasn't home.
The Ruling: The far-reaching retrieval of mobile phone data during dawn raids by the Dutch competition authority is permissible, even if encompassing data of a non-business nature, as affirmed by a recent ruling of the Hague District Court.
The Hague District Court confirmed, in summary proceedings in November 2017, that during dawn raids, the Netherlands Authority for Consumers and Markets (\"ACM\") may make extensive copies of data on mobile phones possibly also containing private data.
The District Court's ruling addressed a request for interim measures following an unannounced on-site inspection of the business premises of an undisclosed company. During the dawn raid, the ACM made digital copies of the data, except for audio recordings, video, and ringtones, on the mobile phones of six employees of the company.
In 2003, the District Court had ruled that the predecessor of the ACM could copy mobile phone data during dawn raids, subject to safeguards to ensure that data of a non-business nature and legally privileged data could subsequently be excluded from the investigation. These safeguards are now enshrined in the ACM's 2014 Guidelines on the investigation of digital data, which set out the handling of digital data collected during investigations of areas of law falling under the ACM's supervision.
In the present case, in requesting an injunction to preclude use of the data copied from the mobile phones, the company argued that the aim of the ACM's investigation was not sufficiently clear and that, in any event, the company did not fall within its scope.
Furthermore, the company indicated that the mobile phones were also used for private purposes and could potentially contain private data. Thus, making digital copies of virtually all data on the mobile phones violated the right to respect for private life under the European Convention on Human Rights (Article 8). The company argued that such interference with the right to respect for private life required a prior judicial order and that, in any case, there was no legal basis for copying private data from the mobile phones.
The District Court further noted with respect to such potential disagreements that, unlike the assessment of requests to exclude legally privileged data, a request concerning data of a non-business nature was assessed by the head of the investigation team instead of an independent official. However, given the possibility of seeking judicial review, the court ruled that the fact that a member of the investigation team would evaluate data to be excluded from the scope of the investigation did not in itself justify an injunction to preclude the ACM from using copies of the challenged mobile phone data.
The Hague District Court confirmed, in summary proceedings in November 2017, that during dawn raids, the Netherlands Authority for Consumers and Markets ("ACM") may make extensive copies of data on mobile phones possibly also containing private data. 006ab0faaa