Corruption in Bristol County Court


philip jones 01454614420 at philip.jones88@btinternet.com


  1. IN DOCUMENT BELOW IN MY WEBSITE WE HAVE HAD A REPLY FROM NEW PCC SHELFORD CONFIRMING POLICE STANCE. I WILL NOT BE MAKING ANY REFERAL TO THE IOPC

  2. I

Can i refer him to IOPC statute,,,,

Most complaints about the police are dealt with by the relevant police force. Each force has a separate department that oversees complaints. These are called ‘professional standards departments’ (PSDs).

By law, forces must refer certain matters to us. These include:


  • certain complaints made to their force – such as those that include an allegation of serious corruption or serious assault

indications that police officers or staff have committed misconduct – for example, any suggestion that a criminal offence have been commited UNQUOTE,,,,,where this corrupt PCC has as statute,,,, suggestions [numerous] of corruption and criminal offences have taken place. You want Shelford to corrupt and frustrate the judicial process so be it, have instucted lawyers to resolve with you,,,,via statute you must refer. We know from third party evidence that computer records removed, from ref 8 enclosed scan 35from police records what was taken,,,,,computer parts and software,,,,where call from police did you know your toolbox gone, will never see again as your computer parts and software,,,,stealing my property is this not as statute,,,,,a criminal offence ect ect ect

Lets put on record as you frustrate and corrupt the judicial process,,,[your not corrupt sue me for libel from my website ] as you state complain to PSD but they are utterlycorrupt,,,,can i refer nothing to do with me a third party article on the internet,given to me by a barrister.



from COPWATCH

For most people the police complaints process is a depressing waste of time. Not only do the police get to investigate themselves and help fellow officers escape misconduct charges, they get to handle appeals to…[further quotes from paper below ,,,,]


When it was recently reported that the police only investigate 4 out of 10 crimes, the Home Office responded by stating: “We expect the police to investigate ALL crime.”

And if the police start reciting huge chunks of legislation in a bid to get rid of you, don’t be afraid to remind them that it is not their job to interpret the law. It is their job to enforce it. The Home Office, the government and the courts are there to explain the fineries of legislation, not some lazy cop who has probably memorized it by rote just to help him pass a Sergeant’s exam……

Consider scan 10475 10494 letter from corrupt Angus Krouwel......[not corrupt told corrupt in my website,long time ago,,why not sue for libel told again today in my website] ,,,police stated you have no evidence malfeasance in public office the civil courts ignoring applications and correspondence for many years,,,,,they have letter from the court ,,,,we ignored your applications come and talk to us,,,,they have letter from a lawyer ,,,,,our application also ignored,,,,they have numerous documents date/stamped by the court ignored. Not withstanding this ask police 11 questions, 22.7.2017,,,eg have you talked to person at court who admits offence in letter, have you talked to lawyer,,,,ect,,,saying 22.7.2017 with no reply would do appeal anyway on the 28.7.2017,,,, WHERE THIS CORRUPT AND BENT KROUWEL SENDS LETTER 24.7.2017 SAYING REPLY TO YOUR APPEAL I HAVE MADE NO APPEAL AS THIS CORRUPT PERSON ADMITS IN HIS LETTER.READ HIS LETTER

Instructions to lawyers over several aspects, one is ensure as statute you refer to IOPC ,if you confirm to lawyers you refuse to do this, i can inform IOPC as statute you refuse to refer to them. You have email address trying to make easy for lawyer,,lrowley@allenhoole.co.uk ,,,,and to save your time, could you please inform her you refuse to refer to IOPC which will stop her raising issue with you.


  1. LETS TRY TO MAKE THINGS EASY FOR YOU ENOUGH PUBLIC MONEY HAS BEEN WASTED OVER THIS PIG CIRCUS. LET ME PRODUCE DOCUMENT WHICH YOU CAN USE VIA REFERENCE WHEN TALKING TO POLICE ,,,AND I CAN USE IN APPLICATION TO IOPC‘LET ME COPY PCC AND PSD INTO TODAYS EMAIL WHERE ASK PCC TO FORWARD TO CHIEF CONSTABLE MARSH. THIS IS HISTORIC PATHWAY eg MURDER THREATS IN 2020 ,,,WHERE PSD AWARE.. CAN REFER TO JUDGES JUDGEMENT THAT CHIEF CONSTABLE MARSH TOO HIGH UP, SHOULD HAVE CONVEYED CONCERNS OVER MURDER THREATS TO PSD AND LOCAL POLICE STATION WHICH I DID ,,,,,ISSUE FOR IOPC. . FROM MALFEASANCE [MISCONDUCT] IN PUBLIC OFFICE CASE LAW,,,,,,

  2. Did the defendant [Marsh/Price/PSD] have a subjective awareness of the likely consequences of the action or omission? [aware i was in protest going to offend over murder threats, eg could have been arrested over threats]

  3. Did the officer [Marsh/PSD .Price ,,,as judge said local police station ] realise (subjective test) that there was a risk not only that his or her conduct was unlawful but also a risk that the consequences of that behaviour would occur? [Price aware before oil in HER police station doorway, surely must be aware a possibility of oil in MP doorway ,in email told PCC also not to call my bluff],,,,,,as i said PSD also aware email Jan 2021 and 11.2.2021 they were PRIMARY people in email, cc then to PCC and MP my final begging email for help over murder threats. So MP aware oil in his doorway if he did nothing over murder threats, issue never presented by lawyers to the court .SEEK YOUR REPLY GROUNDS FOR APPEAL ?????IF NOT WHY NOT ,,,,HAVE POLICE COMMITED AN OFFENCE,,,,ASK LAWYERS FURTHER TO CONSIDER HAVE POLICE COMMITED AN OFFENCE,,,ISSUE ASKED AGAIN LATER TO IOPC,,,,


Were those consequences ‘likely’ as viewed subjectively by the defendant?

Did the officer realise that those consequences were ‘likely’ and yet went on to take the risk?



Suggest was likely was aware protest over non action in murder threats, oil in police doorway, why would they not expect oil in MP doorway.

Recklessness: Price/Marsh/PSD foresees that particular consequences may occur and proceeds with the given conduct, not caring whether those consequences actually occur or not.


  • Criminal negligence: Marsh.Price/PSD did not actually foresee that the particular consequences would flow from actions, but a reasonable person, in the same circumstances, would have foreseen those consequences.

  • From inchoate case law

Mens Rea is the mental element of a person's intention to commit a crime; or knowledge that one's action or lack of action would cause a crime to be committe[MARSH PRICE PSD AWARE CRIME WOULD BE COMMITED BUT DID NOTHING]



  1. THIS IS JUST SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS EMAIL NOW IN TABULATED FORM SERVED ON ALL PARTIES WITH NOW ADDED COMMENT AS REQUIRED EVIDENCE REQUIRED FOR IOPC ,,,,DOES RELATE TO TODAYS CASE ALL QUESTIONS. TRYING TO HELP AND SAVE YOUR TIME ,,,WOULD IT HELP IN YOUR LETTER ENCLOSING MY DOCUMENT TODAY. REFERENCES RELATE TO LETTER TO PROBATION ALL PARTIES ARE AWARE OF.CAN I DEFINE FRONT DESK STAFF JONES [TJ] HAD PROBLEMS WITH HER YEARS AGO RECORDED ON VOICECAM ALTHOUGH BEING DEALT WITH BY ANOTHER MEMBER OF STAFF GETS INVOLVED. FROM RECORDING NOT AT PATCHWAY STATION BUT ON WAY HOME CAN HEAR TRAFFIC ON THE A38 AS PLAYING BACK HER RECORDING I SAY ON TAPE SHE NEEDS A DOGCOLLAR eg A BITCH. FROM HER OWN OMISSION DOES AGAIN 11.2.2021 AND AGAIN WHAT IS WRONG WITH HER DID AGAIN 19.2.2021.BEING DEALT WITH BY A THIRD PARTY. THEN STATES DID NOT KNOW WHAT HE WAS SAYING,,,,A LADY 60 PLUS,,,AS A MEDIC NEVER EXAMINED HER WE MAY ASK HOWEVER ,,,,,,SENILE DEMENTIA,,,,,STATES DID NOT INFORM ME WHY WANTED TO ARRESTED YES YOU WERE ,,,TOLD ME NOT ON SYSTEM GO AWAY WAIT FOR REPLY FROM SGT PRICE OVER MURDER THREATS WHERE WITHIN THE HOUR AS TOLD BY TJ NOT REPORTED TAUNTED MP AS NOT REPORTED CONFIRMED BY HER AND ALSO COPIED POLICE INTO EMAIL,,,,,SENILE DEMENTIA ??????SHE STATES DID NOT KNOW WHAT HE WAS SAYING,,,,CAN SEE WHY POLICE DROP CASE OVER THREATS TO CAUSE ARSON. WE HAVE BARRISTER WHO DEALT WITH CASE AND WILL CITE BARRISTER AM A BARRISTER WHO SAW MY WEBSITE.


QUESTION 1 FOR LAWYERS Can i please have name of barrister and her chambers and person of your firm that came to trial 11.6.2021 required in document to IOPC history,further can i please have name of judge.

QUESTION 2 FOR LAWYERS..As your instructions installed to view arrest, informs me installed correctly appears to back up however police stance non disclosure of documents as it now gives error code 4,,,,,this document not avaliable to this email address,,,NON DISCLOSURE OF DOCUMENTS Can you resolve please and obtain bodycam of arrest, and bodycam seizure of property ,,,and CCTV of alleged offence, as my instructions in April 2021,,,and email 21.6.2021.Can i please quote your reply today ,,,

The information which you require BWV and CCTV should all be on the egress link provided.

The information was released to ourselves which is why the document maybe blocked to be downloaded to another email. I believe that you will need to register in order to see this.


Trying to make it easier for you could you ask police to release to my email address, in disclosure of documents issue for IOPC will complain as my request ignored before. I have registered informs me installed correctly however informs me blocked by police to this email address. .Trying to do as one off ,stopping coming back to you, can you check on arrest you have recording ,,,,when police first stepped onto my property, not inside house and we have audio. For example can i refer to next question police must report to IOPC corruption and criminal behaviour and assault Retired police officer one example has reason to believe criminal damage to front door, caused by police baton, . This delay asked months ago to ALL parties causing great problems for example for years shopping for reductions at Asda, womans husband retired where she moved to Torquay. Have large number of her property given to me which she did not want to take to Torquay, where i can not move as need for reference for seizure that police did .Need to sale, for example in previous sales was able to purchase new tv





QUESTION 3 FOR LAWYERS. Can you ask please that police refer to IOPC, and confirmation from police sent to IOPC.Via statute police must refer to IOPC if allegations of corruption and criminal behaviour, and assault. PSD state ,,,,do not understand issue,,,,if still stance can you ask them to contact me. Barrister AM defined as intellectual insolence saying do not understand,,threatened,,,,do again if still we do not understand will bin, future documents we will bin,,,,WHERE ARE WE I SAY TO MEDIA/IOPC CHINA RUSSIA,,,,,we have call did you know your toolbox gone, will never see again and we have binned computer parts and your software ,,,please see ref 8 ,,,,they steal my property then say we do not understand ect ...ect



QUESTION 4 TO LAWYERS Can you please ask if Sgt Price at work between 11.2.2021 and 18.2.2021,if not when was first day at work, reference judges judgement threats of murder should have been reported to local station, not to Marsh as too high up, and people dealing with complaints, PSD which i did, ALL emails copied to them

QUESTION 5 FOR LAWYERS Can you ask police to confirm there stance in 2017 there was no correspondence from me to Sgt Price, if now change story so can we have it, can i refer to receipt ref 5 number 259327 scan 26 also another number 260861 can they confirm these are forgies as police alledge before, further to confirm why i went to Sgt Price day 1. [can i refer to todays bundle believe ref exhib 7908 as police pervert course of justice, have miscarriage of justice where officer said 20.2.2021,,,,,you know police will never answer question,,,i will just put document in file]





QUESTION 6 TO LAWYERS Can you please ask for return of software and computer parts., please see ref 8 scan 035,,,from correspondence above asked before,,,, Police from call you will never see again, as toolbox we took. Further for return of new bottle of chainsaw oil ect. Further can i refer to person representing the Crown, at court...can you please let me know name and position. Can i refer to hearing 11.6.2021 where he cites police report on seizure,,,,are you aware of report, and could you please obtain for me a copy, all new evidence to me. Is this police tactics in complaints 1.6.2020 and 17.10.2020 say to third party mentally ill, as theme from start in court he tried to raise in todays proceedings.,mentally ill. This mentally ill theme for IOPC as excuse not to answer above complaints ,note now over a year, where police believe if we ignore complaints i will go away.

QUESTION 7 TO LAWYERS Could you please ask for reply to complaints made 1.6.2020 and 17.10.2020 over murder threats. Police sent letters over murder threats…..told in future we will just bin.



QUESTION 8 TO LAWYERS. Could you please inform police these murder threats still going on, need to put on record for IOPC.,lawyer /police informed,,,,identical to Ebrahimi case.Can you discuss with police best if Patchway police station not involved, anyway from Met police force who have been excellent that this station not involved, however there is correspodence wiith Bridewell Bristol,,,,,,however NOTHING over murder threats.????????????????????



QUESTION 9 TO LAWYERS. Could you confirm threats to cause arson dropped by police from file. Do not say you were charged only on damage,,,,,, Could you write to police to confirm as arrested,,,,,poured oil through front door letterbox [PS Parhbga ] that this did not take place, no oil through letterbox. Can you write to police to confirm as their allegations, ref 1 today was not sent to Marsh on the 19.2.2021 but was sent in 2019. Can we obtain receipt for clean up please, to correlate with oil through letterbox.

QUESTION 10 FOR LAWYERS. We have another issue over cost payment. For about 15 years go to Asda for reductions. In Dec 2020 therefore go to Asda for reductions at night. Some people i know very well,,,,had relationship with some ,,,others do not even know name. Heard someones mother terminally ill, the woman herself had fractured patella [kneecap] was looking for transport to see her mother. Friends at Asda working however i said have MOT next day if pass could take her to see her mother. Went through redlight next day, going for MOT, at 1.2 secs, police charge , passed MOT. Due to Covid put plastic barrier between front and back seats ,sealed as stuck down with tape. Police in correspondence state no criminal record, clean driving license, as statute no fine, no points on license, just attend a afternoon police session to close case. Of course best way, however as explained to them can not do, as it gives me now chance to go to court to expose murder threats where police will take no action,hope something will be done over murder threats and being set on fire.as in Ebrahimi case . Police make as difficult as possible, put down hearing in Bath, asked to be transfered to Brisol court, request ignored. Then told Covid restrictions should not be taking people in your car,we may ask for 200.00 fine,as pleading not guilty over 1.2 secs. . Great if police want to bring up already quoted code, will show how far they will go in vexatious chronic attacks on me. BRING IT UP WITH CODE YOU WILL NOT GET ANOTHER 200.00. Can not ask todays lawyers for advice assume will be found guilty ,did go through red light at 1.2 secs..where come to

QUESTION In terms of cost say magistrate state fine 100.00 cost 150.00 ,reasonable to pay 10.00 a week, do i go back to Crown Court judge asking to reconsider his order eg say pay each 5.00 a week, or will magistrate do everything on day

QUESTION 11 FOR LAWYERS ….Again as question 10 need background before question asked. We have issue of complaint 1.6.2020 [SAY TO IOPC YES 1.6.2020 NOT 1.6.2021 waiting over a year for reply] which police refuse to answer. Arose from police letter defined ,,,,police june,,,,in my website. Police have removed from computer [again reason as statute for them to refer to IOPC,,criminal behaviour ] however in my website, actual letter they also removed, no problem its in my website, as was court order from Court of Appeal,[also removed by police] ,,,,in case against police, however as barrister AM stated for 10.00 can get replacement from the court. From police june scan in my website,,,,,retired District Judge who saw my website states ,,,,appaling as does not define what your accused of. In complaint 1.6.2020 asked police to confirm what allegations they were making. ASSUMED as at same time had call, from police, allegations you had stolen new Council pass, and damaged mail. Had letter from neighbour that i had stolen pass, complained to Council,,,,why have you contacted police with complaint, ,,,,THE DAY i obtained ,emailed you, you told me to send pass back to you, and recorded delivery confirms returned nearly 2 WEEKS AGO. Council were excellent in letter,,,,,we made no contact with police ,[issue for IOPC] we told you to return and in a few days obtained ,thank you. How did neighbour Bird know was delivered to me, if not planted on me. [many years ago Bird took caution ].So in complaint asked who complained., IF THIS IS ISSUE Asked further question ,now to IOPC , in miscarriage of justice issue, Sgt Price gave for investigation to PCBird,,,,,where asked if officer related to neighbour.Bird. Police in call also alledge as you can see will be arrested over damage to mail. In complaint and other documents state,,,,,,[did Bird plant] the letters came in Royal Mail bags ,titled MAIL found open and damaged, IF THEY WANT BAGS TO ORGANISE A TIME TO COLLECT,,EMAIL IGNORED.AGAIN ISSUE IOPC. Police are arresting from own documents,,,as poured oil through Letterbox , threats to cause arson, utterlywith no merit where for example forced to drop threats of arson. My problem today getting again string of correspondence for Bird, due to threats to arrest over damaged mail asked PSD to call Royal Mail at Derwert Close to collect to confirm not damaged. PSD ignored email, as will point out to IOPC ,the letters still here, would normally put back in post, however with threats of arrest over damaged mail can not take that chance, they will arrest inmaterial of facts, take corrupt Parhbga ,,,arrested as through oil through MP doorway,,,sorry did not occur,,,,read Jenkins statement.QUESTION CAN YOU ASK POLICE TO CONTACT ROYAL MAIL TO COLLECT MAIL

QUESTION 12 FOR LAWYERS. Reoffended 18.2.2021 over murder threats. Told by police we thought last time 4.1.2021 we had frightened you in custody,did not expect you back, we did not charge as did not want before an open court why you offended, the murder threats which were ignored, Therefore all fingerprints ect removed as statute, we will need to take again fingerprints ect...19.2.2021Can you ask police what action was taken,,,,as barrister AM stated at present the legal position you are on bail under investigation, need facts for IOPC.

QUESTION 13 TO LAWYERS. Could you ask police if MP ever contacted over todays issue.

THE MP LOPRESTI ELEMENT JUST FOR REFERENCE NOT ISSUE FOR IOPC

Lopresti continue stance you never contacted me over miscarriage of justice issue,,,,at random take email 26.9.2016, where police removed from computer,,,forgot to steal paperwork,,, have just hard copy in papers made at earlier date for some reason.. Police seizure computer remove evidence, of emails to/from Loprest but forget that also dealt with by his case worker Michael Cobb where emails clearly show dealing with the court,,,,,court were ignoring eg one example MP correspondence,,,,Cobb ,,,,Jack will write again,,,,CORRUPT not ivolved ,yes you were???????

Need to appeal, much later have permission from the court, todays issue, could not get legal aid anywhere, NEVER rejected on facts , eg too busy ect,,,tried to get refund of court fee ,,,,,court states we did not send application.to HHJCotter So email to my MP Lopresti. Contacted Justice department of government told Rt Hon Buckland not your MP, get your MP to make application to Buckland. So email to MP to do this ignored, as request application to ombudsman for refund of court fee as application 6.12.2017 not read,,,,,,via statute i can not do,,,,,statute,,,complain to court,,,,complain then to Resolver,,,,[still before it after many years,,,last week can we close case as other party not responding ] ,,,,still not resolved ask your MP to refer to ombudsman ,refund of fee,,,,general public can not do only MP can refer,,,,MP IGNORES ALL CORRESPONDENCE,,,,HE IS UTTERLY CORRUPT IF NOT CORRUPT SUE ME FOR LIBEL,,,,from human rights case law,,,,, Legal aid

1. Granting,,, of legal aid

However, the Convention is intended to safeguard rights which are practical and effective, in particular the right of access to a court. Hence, Article 6 § 1 may sometimes compel the State to provide for the assistance of a lawyer when such assistance proves indispensable for an effective access to court (Airey v. Ireland, § 26).


However, the right in question is not absolute and it may therefore be permissible to impose conditions on the grant of legal aid based in particular on the following considerations, in addition to those cited in the preceding paragraph:

the financial situation of the litigant (Steel and Morris v. the United Kingdom, § 62);

his or her prospects of success in the proceedings (ibid). YOU HAVE POLICE ADMITTING MY CLAIM


WHERE MP IGNORES ALL CORRESPONDENCE. CAN I REFER TO POLICE BUNDLE CPS EVIDENCE IN INTERVIEW WITH MP,,,,,,,I IGNORE IF I HAD ALREADY DEALT WITH ISSUE,,,,THIS IS UTTERLY NEW CASE JUST HAD JUDGEMENT PERMISSION TO APPEAL THIS CORRUPT MP HAS NO EXCUSE TO IGNORE MY EMAILS [LOPREST IF NOT CORRUPT SUE ME FOR LIBEL] MADE AWARE OF MURDER THREATS WHICH HE IGNORED. MY LAWYERS RELUCTANT TO PLACE THIS HISTORY BEFORE THE COURT WHY OFFENDED. LOST A LOT OF MONEY AS WOULD NOT SEND TO OMBUDSMAN WHERE COURT ADMITTED THEY HAD NOT SENT APPLICATION TO HHJCOTTER

Well lets do website just 99p www.jacklopresticorrupt.com again if facts not correct sue me for libel. Ican not inform him of website, due to court order, sure someone will let him know from my website


ASKED FOR HELP OVER THREATS TO MURDER ALL CORRESPONDENCE IGNORED,


QUESTION 6 TO MARSH DID MP EVER CONTACT YOU OVER MURDER THREAT



  1. NOTE UPDATE FOR WEBSITES,,,,,APPENDIX TO EMAIL OF 18.6.2021 TIMED 9.08 AM ,,,ISSUE TODAY NOW IOPC

Need to put on record, we must not ignore the ,,,,,,elephant in the room,,,,,for nearly 8 months threat to murder.,,,,,threatning letters forwarded 2020/2021 to police,,,,where told if you get anymore bin ?????? Police told Dec 2020 TWICE if nothing done then oil in their doorway in protest, goaded into offending, then police inform me will not take to court as we do not want why you offended ,[THREATS OF MURDER] before general public via a trial, we removed fingerprints ect will need to do again as reoffended 18.2.2021again over threats to murder. Told TWICE [Jan 2021 11.2.2021 ]as escalate oil in MP doorway.,,,,he also ignored cry for help, issue lawyers afraid to present in mitagation, now water under bridge,,,POLICE IGNORED EBRAHIMI CASE AGAIN OFFENDED 18.2.2021 MP TOLD IT WOULD OCCUR HOPED HE WOULD HAVE COMPLAINED TO POLICE BEFORE OFFENDING SO ARRESTED OVER THREATS ONLY ?????? Arrested as oil through MP letter box UTTER POLICE CORRUPTION NOT TRUE [see police own statement ,,,oil only on bottom left hand side bottom of door on seal,,,,,in own bundle showing utter police corruption,NOT TRUE,,,and threats of arson UTTER POLICE CORRUPTION Then drop threats of arson as would not stand up in court,,,,,police now say,,,we did not know what he was saying,,,,false arrest and imprisonment ????? would not want why offended before general public via a trial reason dropped case. POLICE UTTER COWARDS

Need to inform, as offers to pay court fine, please readers of my websites please do not make offers. Further will have my day in court over side issue going through red light at 1.2 secs in 2020 .Again are police afraid to take to trial. As i said as offered by police clean license, no police convictions, case will be dropped if you attend half day police course. Can not do this as need before general public via a trial to bring out threats of murder, AS TOLD THEM DAY 1, something has to be done over threats to murder,,,, hoping something done.over murder threats. Making as difficult as possible, put hearing down at Bath, ask for transfer to Bristol court ,email 12.5.2021 ,,,,court email a reply in 10 days, month later plus still no reply.Police then state may also charge over Covid breach, bring it on before the court….please see details below,,,,are police afraid what will come out at trial,.over alleged Covid breach.

Issues utterly unknown , we do not know if lawyers as promised will get evidence,for IOPC or just ignore me,,,,then will be a new issue for Law Society ,,, PCSnell saying after assaulting me ,,,,coming back to ransack house, which police did, and PC Collect,saying on arrest ,,,,found electrical, which was a computer to pervert course of justice ,,,,by removing evidence , this was arrest TO CAUSE ARSON. Going out of house through garage window is 5l can of petrol, you know no threats to cause arson, but want computer to remove evidence to pervert course of justice, and steal my property, and just leave petrol. . Further as explained to lawyers ,suggested by barrister AM did police come back again, official receipt of seizure incompatible for later document of what was seized, further not only my medical books thrown all over the floor, CCTV turned off, confirmed by their records, my stephoscope on floor, and opthalmascope box broken and on floor. The computer router wires ripped out, wanted to see from day 1 if on bobycam, if not then it proves police came back again to ransack or words to this effect,,,and take things as Snell said he would do.Lawyers stated had asked for this bobycam,of seizure ,,,,me saying knowing police we will never see ...not interested if police say ,,,,your lawyers never asked,,,,,clear instructions again to them, further refer IOPC to my request to police ignored, and reporting of such to lawyers, ,,,,,however we do not know if they will ask questions as promised in list given to them ,relating to various issues for the IOPC


IS LETTER TO COURT PROBATION .THERE WAS A FURTHER LETTER SERVED ON MY LAWYERS PLANNED TO GIVE TO JUDGE BEFORE HEARING OF THE 11.6.2021 HOWEVER BARRISTTER SAID DO NOT SERVE ON JUDGE WE VIA Ms ROWLEY [ALLENHOOLE] WILL HELP YOU IN NEXT STAGE .TO THEIR CREDIT IN LATEST EMAIL Ms ROWLANDS ASKS WHAT HELP I NEED. WE NEED ANSWERS TO SERIES OF QUESTIONS ALSO COVERED TODAY NEW PCC AND PRO STANDARDS DEPT OF POLICE [PSD] IN THIS EMAIL. WHERE ASK AS BEFORE PCC FORWARDS A COPY TO CHIEF CONSTABLE MARSH FOR FUTURE COURT USE.DIRECT RELEVANCE IN JUDGEMENT AS JUDGE SAID MARSH WAS TOO HIGH UP ,,,,,YOUR THREATS AS PROTEST TO OFFEND ,,,,DEPOSIT OF OIL IN EXTERNAL DOORWAY DUE TO MURDER THREATS ,,,,,SHOULD HAVE BEEN MADE DIRECTED AT PEOPLE WHO DEAL WITH COMPLAINTS AND LOCAL LEGAL PEOPLE LIKE LOCAL POLICE STATION. BUT THEY WERE PSD AND CORRUPT SGT PRICE AT PATCHWAY POLICE STATION,,,,,GROUNDS FOR APPEAL ???????FROM MALFEASANCE [MISCONDUCT] IN PUBLIC OFFICE CASE LAW,,,,,,


  1. Did the defendant [Marsh/Price/PSD] have a subjective awareness of the likely consequences of the action or omission? [aware i was in protest going to offend over murder threats, eg could have been arrested over threats]

  2. Did the officer [Marsh/Price ,,,as judge said local police station ] realise (subjective test) that there was a risk not only that his or her conduct was unlawful but also a risk that the consequences of that behaviour would occur? [Price aware before oil in HER police station doorway, surely must be aware a possibility of oil in MP doorway ,in email told PCC also not to call my bluff],,,,,,as i said PSD also aware email Jan 2021 and 11.2.2021 they were PRIMARY people in email, cc then to PCC and MP my final begging email for help over murder threats. So MP aware oil in his doorway if he did nothing over murder threats, issue never presented by lawyers to the court .


QUESTION 1 FOR LAWYERS Can i please have name of barrister and her chambers and person of your firm that came to trial 11.6.2021

1/ In April 2021 asked police under diclosure of documents for evidence eg bodycam of arrest,and seizure of property and CCTV of actual alleged offence ,which was ignored ,,where lawyers in email inform me they had asked. NOT INTERESTED if police state lawyers never asked,,,,the bottom line for example IOPC my request of disclosure of documents ignored. Can i refer to email in March 2021 where i stated would never see seizure of property CCTV. Lawyers have sent me only this week CCTV of arrest.

QUESTION 2 FOR LAWYERS..As your instructions installed to view arrest, informs me installed correctly appears to back up however non disclosure of documents as it now gives error code 4,,,,,this document not avaliable to this email address. Can you resolve please and obtain CCTV of arrest, and seizure of property CCTV please as my instructions in April 2021.

2/ Via statute police must refer to IOPC allegations of assault, corruption and criminal activity, where my application to PSD to refer to them. Petra King at PSD perverting course of justice, last thing she would want is for complaint to go to them,,,,,,get email do again, maximum 2 pages, [IOPC inform no limit ]told i do not understand issue, told if i do not understand next time it will be binned and future correspondence relating to it will be ignored, issue for IOPC. As i said to King your corrupt and bent perverting the course of justice .SAY TO PCC THIS IS TYPE OF PEOPLE YOUR EMPLOYING. Asked King to inform me when sent to IOPC assume not done as she perverts course of justice, as she is utterly corrupt.

QUESTION 3 FOR LAWYERS. Can you ask please that police refer to IOPC, and confirmation from police sent to IOPC.

QUESTION 1 TO MARSH,,,,[asking please PCC refer this document to Marsh]Can you instruct King to refer to IOPC. Can i please seperate barrister acting in this case ,cited above asked lawyers before for name, and barrister who saw my website defined barrister AM. Barrister AM suggested if any aspect not clear that King calls me. Further she could refer stating issues not clear. If not corrupt and bent eg she has refered to IOPC i will issue an apology in my website, if she supplies evidence she has refered to IOPC. SAY TO KING IF FACTS UNTRUE SUE ME FOR LIBEL

3/ Can i please refer to judges judgement, that Marsh too high up your concerns over threats of murder and being set on fire, IDENTICAL TO EBRAHIMI CASE and your protest of this,,,deposit of oil, should have been made to people dealing with complaints and local police station BUT THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT I DID. In Dec 2020 police told twice of oil in their external doorway if threats to murder me not dealt with, so oil in doorway 4.1.2021. Told end of Jan 2021 would escalate ,,,,oil in MP office doorway, followed up with letter as above of the 11.2.2021. Will help IOPC have historic recording with front office staff Ms Jones [TJ] where problems over just giving receipt for a letter i wished to leave at Patchway police station,,,,,not in front of her ,we can hear on Voicecam recording on way home, traffic on the A38 with my comment after making sure recorded ,me saying she needs a dogcollar,,,,eg she is a bitch. From her statement from this historic event again although being dealt with by another member of staff, AGAIN can not help herself she admits she was involved as i left letter on the 11.2.2021., although other staff dealing with matter. So oil in MP doorway 18.2.2021. On the 19.2.2021 went to be arrested to stop being murdered, again being dealt with by a member of staff, however TJ can not help herself as wants to deal with issue. She is told this can not go on any more ,threats to murder, had taken up issue with police and specific Sgt Price in letter. Asked why wanted to be arrested, told her , where TJ states not on system ,not reported, go away wait for reply from Sgt Price. Said to her would not occur however if i had said thrown petrol in MP doorway would you say go away wait for reply from Sgt Price. Worried over murder threats asked TJ when we will get reply to murder threats, told you will not dictate to police when we deal with issue, asked if in today ,,,told no, asked if in in last week told YES. CAN I REFER TO JUDGES JUDGEMENT,,,,,REPORT TO LOCAL STATION SO SHE WAS AWARE OVER THREATS TO MURDER ASKED POLICE IN DISCLOSURE OF DOCUMENTS IF PRICE IN WORK IN PERIOD 11 TO 19.2.2021 WHERE REQUEST IGNORED. AS THEY IGNORED CORRESPONDENCE FOR YEARS.

QUESTION 2 TO MARSH. Was Sgt Price in work in this time span. 11 to 19.2.2021

QUESTION 4 TO LAWYERS Can you please ask same question to police.

TJ as corrupt [if not corrupt sue me for libel this document in my websites]states never told me why he wanted to be arrested, yes you were as soon as went home emailed MP copy to police ,tauted MP as she informed me not reported ,alleged offence not on system, go away await reply from Price. Why would i not say why wanted to be arrested ,as wanted to stop murder threats, HOW DID I KNOW MP HAD NOT REPORTED IF NOT TOLD BY HER ,,,NOT ON SYSTEM. Why would i say throw oil in MP doorway ,,,,had done this to stop threats of murder, you informing me not reported,,,,,why do again if MP will not report. We know Price had letter , as judges judgement , should have been reported to local police station ,,,as TJ confirms letter was left 11.2.2021

4/ Price can not pervert course of justice this time saying never obtained letter,,,,TJ confirms letter was left. Can i please refer to document sent to probation ref 5 scan picture 26 .This relates to miscarriage of justice, please see also ref 1 in that document to probation, scan picture 29. Price states ,issue today for IOPC ,over miscarriage of justice, that i never wrote to her, and police make allegations that receipts ref 5 have been forged. Price your corrupt over allegations, if not corrupt sue me for libel. This is issue for IOPC not lawyers today, however need to ask question.

QUESTION 3 FOR MARSH. The receipt ref 5 number 259327 [letter to probation] also another number 260861 can you confirm these are forgies. Talked to medical department at the court, young lady said next time at Patchway station would try to look at ,,,,property receipt form ...to see in system if they give you master receipt which i now have ,,,however underneath we had identical copy what was given to you. We have in another form 2 receipts to corrupt Price confirming letters to her.

QUESTION 5 TO LAWYERS,,,Could you please ask police same question.

IOPC issue now can i please refer to ref 3 and 4 in probation letter scan 10475 10494 over miscarriage of justice, where corrupt Knowle makes statement, IF NOT CORRUPT SUE ME FOR LIBEL the allegation for years in my website. YOUR CORRUPT MAKING MARSH AWARE. Picket at court ,barrister who i gave leaflet to told me to report to the police malfeasance [misconduct] in public office to the police, court ignoring applications and correspondence for years, where PSD state you have no evidence. We have letters from the court ,[for IOPC],,,,we ignored your applications come and talk to us,,,,they have letter from lawyer,,,,,our correspondence ignored. So wish to appeal,,,,asked police 22.7.2017 11 questions eg have you asked lawyer for confirmation that THEIR application also ignored, have you talked to person at court who admits allegation,,,,we ignored your applications and correspondence come and talk to us,,,you have numerous documents date/stamped by the court as taken by hand ,,where i state to polie unless i hear from you by the 28.7.2017 will assume you refuse to answer questions and WOULD DO APPEAL ON AFTER THE 28.7.2017.Where corrupt Knowsel perverting course of justice sends letter 24.7.2017 rejecting appeal, i have made no appeal, waiting for reply to questions, would do appeal on/after the 28.7.2017. No dispute here for IOPC please see probation document ref 3 and 4,,,eg scans 10475 10494 where he admits facts. YOUR CORRUPT

5/ Can i again go back to letter to probation . In reference scan picture 6 and 7 is official police receipt of what was seized, can i please refer to scan picture 8 where other items seized eg software and computer parts.

QUESTION 4 TO MARSH Is scan picture 8 your document.

Computer parts were a TV monitor, while doing research at university ,supervisors consultant surgeon and consultant radiologist ,,,tv monitor in skip, where obtained permission to take, marked university property assumed taken as believed stolen property by police,,,,,however as statute seizure only on relation to crime charged with, arrested over arson.????? The software were 7 USB backup sticks , assumed police wanted to returned after removal of data. Remember arrested over threat to cause arson, where police aware false arrest false imprisonment where had to drop case. We have the utter shambles of TJ saying did not understand what he was saying,,,,,,,an elderly lady in her 60s ,as a medic of course never being able to examine, however is there a case of onset of senile dementia, she can remember,,,,,something has to be done,,,,[over murder threats] but not remember what issue was,,,,,however inform me offence not on system where i confirmed conversation to MP and police,,,taunted MP as not reported, as TJ had confirmed this alleged offence not on system,after informing her why offended... Again why was computer removed as arrested over threats to cause arson. Can be explained from arrest, in first second as PCCollett states,,,,,,found electrical,,,,,waiting for recording, done to remove data from my computer to pervert course of justice. Why take a brand new bottle of chainsaw oil ?????and leave behind as assume dirty other oil. Charged at 2.00 pm 20.2.2021 ,asked 5.00 pm if wanted food told no as told going home now. At about 8.00 asked for food told should have taken food at 6.00pm. Not released although knowing severe claustophobic until about 10.00pm. Barrister AM suggested could be back at house ,waiting for darkness, my medical books all over floor, stephoscope on floor , my opthalmascope on floor where lid of box ripped off after throwing on floor. Had call your toolbox you will never see again,,,,,had padlock why not break padlock lie through teeth say was broken when we came rather than steal my property. Lawyers had stated we have asked for return of computer parts and software which included installation disc ,again not interested if police state your lawyers never asked.

QUESTION 6 TO LAWYERS Can you please ask for return of software and computer parts., from correspondence inform asked before,,,, Further for return of chainsaw oil ect. Further can i refer to person representing the Crown, at court...can you please let me know name and position. Can i refer to hearing 11.6.2021 where he cites police report on seizure,,,,are you aware of report, and could you please obtain me a copy, all new evidence to me. Is this police tactics in complaints 1.6.2020 and 17.10.2020 say to third party mentally ill, as theme from start in court he tried to raise in proceedings.,mentally ill. This mentally ill theme for IOPC as excuse not to answer above complaints ,note now one over a year, where police believe if we ignore complaints i will go away. Issue for IOPC.

6/ Can i refer to judges judgement again, that I should inform police of murder threats however not Marsh to seek responce.. Well covered PSD from above ,,,,today as judges judgement will do again.. As i said to judge these threats to murder , being stalted will go on no longer. Police stole my VoiceCam,,,will buy another, a few weeks ago again followed by same woman,still going on ,,,,where would now after purchase of Voicecam have recording ,,,she will be told last time, next time i will put her in hospital.Unless lawyers believe a better way, do not think Patchway police station should be involved , further not attack on police, Met police have been excellent ,understand anyway no correspondence between this woman and Patchway, but correspondence with Bridewell. THE DISTURBING EVIDENCE HOWEVER FROM MET ,,,,IS THAT AVON AND SOMERSET HAVE NEVER CONTACTED US OVER MURDER THREATS. I HAVE TOLD YOU TODAY AS JUDGES JUDGEMENT INFORMED OF MURDER THREATS WAITING FOR POLICE ACTION.

QUESTION 7 TO LAWYERS. Could you please inform police these threats still going on, Can use in evidence to IOPC.

7/Barrister AM suggested before it goes to IOPC should clarify facts, so no misunderstanding .Take for example alleged damage, concerns as i said to barrister [not AM todays barrister] it shows damage down left and right side of door. Barrister stated sun reflection, as Jenkins statement,,,,,,although bottles on floor ,key on right hand side of door ,noticed no damage, then told of alleged offence and notice damage to just bottom seal of door onthe left hand side. As barrister stated they are only claiming for damage to bottom left hand corner of door, which you admit you caused so told by barrister to plead guilty.

QUESTION 8 TO LAWYERS. Could you confirm threats to cause arson removed by police. Could you write to police to confirm as arrested,,,,,poured oil through front door [PS Parhbga ] that this did not take place, no oil through letterbox. Can you write to police to confirm as their allegations, ref 1 today was not sent to Marsh on the 19.2.2021 as police alledge., admit they have dropped case however required for IOPC.

QUESTION 5 TO MARSH. Can you confirm no correspondence to you dated 19.2.2021 if you alledge you did can i please have copy. Further as arrested from above, can you confirm no oil was ever poured through letterbox,

8/ We have another issue over cost payment. In Dec 2020 go to Asda for reductions at night. Some people i know very well,,,,had relationship with some ,,,others do not even know name. Heard someones mother terminally ill, the woman herself had fractured patella [kneecap] was looking for transport to see her mother. Friends at Asda working however i said have MOT next day if pass could take her to see her mother. Went through redlight next day, going for MOT, at 1.2 secs, passed MOT. Due to Covid put plastic barrier between front and back seats ,sealed as stuck down with tape. Police in correspondence state no criminal record, clean driving license, as statute no fine, no points on license, just attend a afternoon police session to close case. Of course best way, however as explained to them can not do, as it gives me chance to go to court to expose murder threats where police will take no action,hope something will be done over murder threats and being set on fire. . Police make as difficult as possible, put down hearing in Bath, asked to be transfered to Brisol court, request ignored. Then told Covid restrictions should not be taking people in your car,we may ask for 200.00 fine,as pleading not guilty. . Great if police want to bring up already quoted code, will show how far they will go in vexatious chronic attacks on me. BRING IT UP WITH CODE YOU WILL NOT GET ANOTHER 200.00. Can not ask todays lawyers for advice assume will be found guilty ,did go through red light at 1.2 secs..

QUESTION 9 TO LAWYER In terms of cost say magistrate state fine 100.00 cost 150.00 ,reasonable to pay 10.00 a week, do i go back to Crown Court judge asking to reconsider his order eg say pay each 5.00 a week.

9/ We have issue of complaint 1.6.2020 [SAY TO IOPC YES 1.6.2020 NOT 1.6.2021 ] which police refuse to answer. Arose from police letter defined ,,,,police june,,,,in my website. Police have removed from computer however in my website, actual letter they also removed, no problem its in my website, as court order from Court of Appeal,[also removed by police] ,,,,in case against police, however as barrister AM stated for 10.00 can get replacement from the court. From police june scan in my website,,,,,retired District Judge who saw my website states ,,,,appaling as does not define what your accused of. In complaint 1.6.2020 asked police to confirm what allegations they were making. ASSUMED as at same time had call, from police, allegations you had stolen new Council pass, and damaged mail. Had letter from neighbour that i had stolen pass, complained to Council,,,,why have you contacted police with complaint, the DAY i obtained ,emailed you, you told me to send pass back to you, and recorded delivery confirms returned nearly 2 WEEKS AGO. Council were excellent in letter,,,,,we made no contact with police ,[issue for IOPC] we told you to return and in a few days you did ,thank you. How did neighbour Bird know was delivered to me, if not planted on me. [many years ago Bird took caution over threats of violence].So in complaint asked who complained. Asked further question ,now to IOPC , in miscarriage of justice issue, Sgt Price gave for investigation to PCBird,,,,,where asked if officer related to neighbour.Bird. Police in call also alledge as you can see will be arrested over damage to mail. In complaint and other documents state,,,,,,[did Bird plant] the letters came in Royal Mail bags ,titled found open and damaged, IF THEY WANT BAGS TO ORGANISE A TIME TO COLLECT,,EMAIL IGNORED.AGAIN ISSUE IOPC. Police are arresting from own documents,,,as poured oil through Letterbox , threats to cause arson, utterlywith no merit where for example forced to drop threats of arson. My problem today getting again string of correspondence for Bird, due to threats to arrest over damaged mail asked PSD to call Royal Mail at Derwert Close to collect to confirm not damaged. PSD ignored email, as will point out to IOPC ,the letters still here, would normally put back in post, however with threats of arrest over damaged mail can not take that chance, they will arrest inmaterial of facts, take corrupt Parhbga ,,,arrested as through oil through MP doorway,,,sorry did not occur,,,,read Jenkins statement.

10/ THE MP LOPRESTI ELEMENT JUST FOR REFERENCE NOT ISSUE FOR IOPC

Lopresti continue stance you never contacted me over miscarriage of justice issue,,,,at random email 26.9.2016, where police removed from computer,,,forgot to steal paperwork,,, have just hard copy in papers made at earlier date for some reason.. Police seizure computer remove evidence, of emails to/from Loprest but forget that also dealt with by his case worker Michael Cobb where emails clearly show dealing with the court,,,,,court were ignoring eg one example MP correspondence,,,,Cobb ,,,,Jack will write again,,,,CORRUPT ???????

Need to appeal, have permission from the court, todays issue, could not get legal aid anywhere, NEVER rejected on facts , eg too busy ect,,,tried to get refund of court fee ,,,,,court states we did not send application.to HHJCotter So email to my MP Lopresti. Contacted Justice department of government told Rt Hon Buckland not your MP, get your MP to make application to Buckland. So email to MP to do this ignored, as request application to ombudsman for refund of court fee as application 6.12.2017 not read,,,,,,via statute i can not do,,,,,statute,,,complain to court,,,,complain then to Resolver,,,,[still before it after many years,,,last week can we close case as other party not responding ] ,,,,still not resolved ask your MP to refer to ombudsman ,refund of fee,,,,general public can not do only MP can refer,,,,MP IGNORES ALL CORRESPONDENCE,,,,HE IS UTTERLY CORRUPT IF NOT CORRUPT SUE ME FOR LIBEL,,,,from human rights case law,,,,, Legal aid

1. Granting,,, of legal aid

However, the Convention is intended to safeguard rights which are practical and effective, in particular the right of access to a court. Hence, Article 6 § 1 may sometimes compel the State to provide for the assistance of a lawyer when such assistance proves indispensable for an effective access to court (Airey v. Ireland, § 26).


However, the right in question is not absolute and it may therefore be permissible to impose conditions on the grant of legal aid based in particular on the following considerations, in addition to those cited in the preceding paragraph:

the financial situation of the litigant (Steel and Morris v. the United Kingdom, § 62);

his or her prospects of success in the proceedings (ibid). YOU HAVE POLICE ADMITTING MY CLAIM


WHERE MP IGNORES ALL CORRESPONDENCE. CAN I REFER TO POLICE BUNDLE CPS EVIDENCE IN INTERVIEW WITH MP,,,,,,,I IGNORE IF I HAD ALREADY DEALT WITH ISSUE,,,,THIS IS UTTERLY NEW CASE JUST HAD JUDGEMENT PERMISSION TO APPEAL THIS CORRUPT MP HAS NO EXCUSE TO IGNORE MY EMAILS [LOPREST IF NOT CORRUPT SUE ME FOR LIBEL] MADE AWARE OF MURDER THREATS WHICH HE IGNORED. MY LAWYERS RELUCTANT TO PLACE THIS HISTORY BEFORE THE COURT WHY OFFENDED. LOST A LOT OF MONEY AS WOULD NOT SEND TO OMBUDSMAN WHERE COURT ADMITTED THEY HAD NOT SENT APPLICATION TO HHJCOTTER

Well lets do website just 99p www.jacklopresticorrupt.com again if facts not correct sue me for libel. Ican not inform him of website, due to court order, sure someone will let him know from my website


ASKED FOR HELP OVER THREATS TO MURDER ALL CORRESPONDENCE IGNORED,


QUESTION 6 TO MARSH DID MP EVER CONTACT YOU OVER MURDER THREATS

  1. EMAIL TO Ms ROWLEY LAWYERS ALLENHOOLE ASKING HER TO CONTACT CPS TO OBTAIN EVIDENCE FOR Ms SLOCOMBE ………..PROBATION COURT INTERVIEW 27.5.2021 9.00 AM BY PHONE WITH Ms SLOCOMBE COURT MORE THAN HELPFUL TOLD ALL WE NEED TO SAY WHY OFFENDED EASY HAVE THREATS OF MURDER IN OCT 2020 COMPLAINT TO POLICE FOLLOW UP COMPLAINT 17.10.2020 TO POLICE IGNORED. BEGINNING AND END OF DEC 2020 INFORM CHIEF CONSTABLE MARSH WOULD TAKE MATTER IN MY OWN HANDS BY PLACING OIL IN POLICE STATION DOORWAY AS WAY OF PROTEST. ALTHOUGH AWARE OF THREAT MARSH TOOK NO ACTION OVER THREAT. SO GOADED INTO OFFENDING ON THE 4.1.2021 HOWEVER MARSH REFUSES TO PROSECUTE DO NOT WANT AT A HEARING IDENTICAL TO EBRAHIMI CASE WHERE HE WAS MURDERED. SO STILL GETTING MURDER THREATS SO MARSH TOLD IN JAN 2021 AND 11.2.2021 WOULD LEAVE OIL IN MP DOORWAY,,,,AS PROTEST DID NOT WANT TO BE MURDERED WHERE MARSH AWARE OF THREAT HOWEVER GOADED ME INTO OFFENDING WHICH OCCURED 19.2.2021.MP WAS ASKED FOR HELP. POLICE ALLEDGE 19.2.2021 THAT FURTHER THREATS WERE MADE Ms ROWLANDS INFORM ME THIS CHARGE DROPPED HOWEVER COULD NOT UNDERSTAND AS COURT DOCUMENT STATES THAT Ms SLOCOMBE WILL CONSIDER THIS ELEMENT. Ms SLOCOMBE WOULD ALSO CONSIDER WILL IT OCCUR AGAIN, NO TODAY HAVE MY DAY IN COURT TO GET SOMETHING DONE OVER THREATS TO MURDER,,,,MARSH AFRAID OF EVIDENCE WHICH COULD HAVE BEEN PUT TO A COURT AFTER 4.1.2021 OFFENCE AND EVEN BEFORE IN 2020,Ms SLOCOMBE WILL PRESENT EVIDENCE TO THE JUDGE. WILL TAKE BY HAND COPY OF THIS DOCUMENT EVIDENCE FOR Ms SLOCOMBE WHERE ASK PLEASE FOR RECEIPT. ,,,,,,SO GIVING HER NOTES BEFORE INTERVIEW...,RETURN TO COURT MIDDAY 11.6.2021 THE ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM THREAT TO MURDER.THE JUDGE STATES YOU MUST GIVE Ms SLOCOMBE 100 % COOPERATION WHICH I WILL DO TRUST I WILL GET CREDIT FOR THIS HOWEVER I TRUST Ms SLOCOMBE IN HER REPORT IF EVEN HANDED WILL EXPRESS HER VIEWS CONCERNING POLICE AND CIVIL COURTS IN THEIR COPERATION IN HER INVESTIGATION.eg THE HUMAN RIGHTS LEGAL CONTEXT OF EQUALITY OF ARMS WHICH INCLUDES ALSO,,,.ECHR CASE LAW ,,,,,,,REQUEST CPS REPLY BEFORE 25.5.2021.THIS IS IDENTICAL TO PROFUMA AFFAIR CORRUPTION BETWEEN POLICE AND COURTS WITH TORY MP INVOLVED. IN 1960s MY LETTERS TO CHRISTINE KEELER AND MEDIA,,,,FOR EXAMPLE NEWSPAPER REPLY SHE WAS NOT INNOCENT PARTY IN THIS SEE ADVERT OF DANISH MAGAZINE CONCERNING 8 MM FILM. ,,,HUMAN RIGHTS QUOTE LAW,,,

Witnesses for the prosecution and the defence must be treated equally; The Court has found that unrestricted access to the case file and unrestricted use of any notes, including, if necessary, the possibility of obtaining copies of relevant documents, are important guarantees of a fair trial. The failure to afford such access has weighed in favour of finding that the principle of equality of arms had been breached (Beraru v. Romania, § 70). In this context, importance is attached to appearances as well as to the increased sensitivity to the fair administration of justice. Respect for the rights of the defence requires that limitations on access by an accused or his lawyer to the court file must not prevent the evidence from being made available to the accused before the trial and the accused from being given an opportunity to comment on it through his lawyer in oral submissions (Öcalan v. Turkey [GC], § 140). Non-disclosure of evidence to the defence may breach equality of arms as well as the right to an adversarial hearing (Kuopila v. Finland, § 38, where the defence was not given an opportunity to comment on a supplementary police report). As a rule, Article 6 § 1 requires that the prosecution authorities disclose to the defence all material evidence in their possession for or against the accused (Rowe and Davis v. the United Kingdom [GC], § 60). In this context, the relevant considerations can also be drawn from Article 6 § 3 (b), which guarantees to the applicant “adequate time and facilities for the preparation of his defence” (Leas v. Estonia, § 80).4 173. An issue with regard to access to evidence may arise under Article 6 insofar as the evidence at issue is relevant for the applicant’s case, specifically if it had an important bearing on the charges held against the applicant. This is the case if the evidence was used and relied upon for the determination of the applicant’s guilt or it contained such particulars which could have enabled the applicant to exonerate oneself or have the sentence reduced. The relevant evidence in this context is not only evidence directly relevant to the facts of the case, but also other evidence that might relate to the admissibility, reliability and completeness of the former (Rowe and Davis v. the United Kingdom [GC], § 66; Mirilashvili v. Russia, § 200; b. Adversarial hearing As a rule, Article 6 § 1 requires that the prosecution authorities disclose to the defence all material evidence in their possession for or against the accused (Rowe and Davis v. the United Kingdom [GC], § 60). In this context, the relevant considerations can also be drawn from Article 6 § 3 (b), which guarantees to the applicant “adequate time and facilities for the preparation of his defence” (Leas v. Estonia, § 80).4 173. An issue with regard to access to evidence may arise under Article 6 insofar as the evidence at issue is relevant for the applicant’s case, specifically if it had an important bearing on the charges held against the applicant. This is the case if the evidence was used and relied upon for the determination of the applicant’s guilt or it contained such particulars which could have enabled the applicant to exonerate oneself or have the sentence reduced. The relevant evidence in this context is not only evidence directly relevant to the facts of the case, but also other evidence that might relate to the admissibility, reliability and completeness of the former (Rowe and Davis v. the United Kingdom [GC], § 66; Mirilashvili v. Russia, § 200; Leas v. Estonia, § 81; Matanović v. Croatia, § 161). 174. prosecuting authorities are obliged by law to take into consideration both the facts for and against the suspect, a procedure whereby the prosecuting authorities themselves attempt to assess what may or may not be relevant to the case, without any further procedural safeguards for the rights of the defence, cannot comply with the requirements of Article 6 § 1 (Natunen v. Finland, §§ 47-49; Matanović v. Croatia, §§ 158, 181- 182). 175. Belgium, § 85).

UNQUOTE FROM CRIMINAL LIMB ECHR CASE LAW

So ask Ms Rowland to ask questions please to police/court with reply by the 25.5.2021 with no reply to inform Ms Slocombe so she have evidence before interview of the 27.5.2021 and can make her views clear to the court. .Accept Ms Rowland will formulate questions as she feels fit ,under no circumstances will convey my format shown below at end. THE FORMAT HOWEVER FOR EVIDENCE REQUIRED IN MY QUESTIONS I WANT ANSWER TO QUESTIONS IN LIST BELOW AT END Further this document delivered to Ms Slocombe so she can advise before interview any further evidence she requires to do her report. Ms Slocombe looking why offended can i cite,,,

,Can i change CASE LAW text reference below to read,,,,defendant to Chief Constable Marsh as ask questions,today,,,,lawyer today said court would ask why offended ,,,,the offence misconduct in public life,,,,,QUOTE

In considering whether the neglect or misconduct was wilful, the following issues should be addressed:


  • Did the defendant have a subjective awareness of a duty to act or subjective recklessness as to the existence


  • of a duty?

  • Did the defendant have a subjective awareness that the action or omission might be unlawful?

  • Did the defendant have a subjective awareness of the likely consequences of the action or omission?

  • Did the officer realise (subjective test) that there was a risk not only that his or her conduct was unlawful but also a risk that the consequences of that behaviour would occur?

  • Were those consequences ‘likely’ as viewed subjectively by the defendant?

  • Did the officer realise that those consequences were ‘likely’ and yet went on to take the risk?





Recklessness: the defendant foresees that particular consequences may occur and proceeds with the given conduct, not caring whether those consequences actually occur or not.


  • Criminal negligence: the defendant did not actually foresee that the particular consequences would flow from his actions, but a reasonable person, in the same circumstances, would have foreseen those consequences.

  • From inchoate case law


    • Mens Rea is the mental element of a person's intention to commit a crime; or knowledge that one's action or lack of action would cause a crime to be committed.

Mirojuhys v Latvia …………………fairness of proceedings always assessed by examining them in entirety that an isolated incident may not be sufficient to conclude proceedings as a whole unfair…. ,,,,,[,i am afraid the reader will need to consider issues as a whole if going to understand why offended,,,,eg why went to my MP in 2018 via statute why i had to go to him]

THE FACTS [chronological order court cases are all civil]





1/ Please see appendix final where party admits in letter perjury ,however now party states to police in defence ,,,,we will not take court award, eg will not take cost money awarded , so police say you have lost nothing [untrue lost case no free central heating]so will do nothing, complain to PCC,,,,,in reply will not get involved ,any future correspondence police will ignore. As i said to PCC so i can rob a bank, payback money, and you will take no action,,,,POLICE STANCE. Case HISTORIC NOT ISSUE TODAY terminated at earlier date at court of appeal, where Lord Golding was excellent, tried to help me get judgement, said can we show corruption, via statute very limited ways to grant an appeal, in judgement stated the county court got verdict very badly wrong, however could not appeal due to statute,,,,only special items,,,,,Strickson v Preston county court EWCA 1132 [2007] cost award however to court he could quash however could not quash award to the party in litagation. Although party admitting perjury police state anyway you have no evidence of perjuryplease see scan appendix final, ….repeated again ,,,no evidence in different case below in 2/,?????????????????????????



2/ Never forgiven by the courts over above judgement. We have court ignoring my applications and correspondence, where issue cited in my website, HHJDenyer then states remove website or consequences.,will not be BLACKMAILED. Relevant today, police removing evidence ,must have copy, as i have today, shows police criminal behaviour, today asking for referal to the IOPC ,,,,so asked Compuwave to find way to back up, emails, program given would not work, told was working when you left shop, so litagation started, the program given on invoice, where they now admit typing error in program given , case then settled, where ask court via email to remove from hearing list .eg email


CLAIM NUMBER B26YM042 HEARING 5.1.2016


Could you please put before a judge as soon as possible, to vacate hearing 5.1.2016. I accept as in AOIBS346 Jones v N Bristol NHS Trust , for medical records, DJBrittan would not accept settlement and told both parties to attend court. This again was a settlement request from defendants a few days before second hearing, and i informed hospital lawyer, that settlement was nonsense, however they now give me everything requested from day 1. [identical today]


In todays issue, from tab 4 these instructions to read emails are utterly different from instructions given 21.12.2015, from tab 6 my email to defendants, where asked if tab 4 correct, which obtained no reply, as defendants ignored email, proceedings issued. Again a few days before hearing defendants ask to settle, as court aware no papers 14 days before hearing by defendants. ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,UNQUOTE

Record call later to court told HHJDenyer removed from hearing list no need to attend court ,,,,matter settled, then get judgement ,,, hearing took place ,no parties turned up, case struck out where appeal, send copy of recording not to attend, where see what CONSEQUENCES MEAN AS RESTRAINING ORDER BECAUSE I APPEALED. Applications to remove order ignored, by court.....

3/ So as restraining order in place need to ask HHJCotter to issue any further proceedings., eg malfeasance in public office court ignoring applications and correspondence for years, take complaint to police ,becomes IPCC investigation where police admit we did not follow IPCC regulations, in our investigation, and sent reply to your appeal where no appeal had been made. BACKGROUND,,,.As court ignoring applications and correspondence picket at the court, TWICE not as CPS state today on regular basis, barrister who i gave leaflet to on leaving court told to report malfeasance [misconduct] in public office to the police as court ignoring applications and correspondence for years, warned about police may try to brush off, please see cited document in appendix final from internet Copwatch. Seen by Sgt Price Patchway police station, told to paste CPS document on malfeasance in public office ,and within it make my complaint, the barrister was correct, was being brushed off Price stated make claim to JCIO [judicial conduct investigation office] ,police too busy to deal with this, please look at Copwatch appendix final where Homeoffice state,,,,all crimes should be investigated. SHE STATED DID NOT KNOW WHAT MALFEASANCE STOOD FOR IF NOT CRIMINAL OFFENCE WOULD NOT GIVE TO OFFICER TO LOOK AT. SO PRICE AWARE LATER A CRIMINAL OFFENCE VIA STATUTE JCIO COULD NOT INVESTIGATE AS THEY CAN NOT LOOK AT CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS,,,,AS THEIR WEBSITE STATES,,,IN THESE CIRCUMSTANCES YOU NEED TO COMPLAIN TO POLICE THATS WHAT I DID. PRICE GAVE TO PCBIRD TO INVESTIGATE.Correspondence with JCIO told via STATUTE from our website we can not investigate as criminal allegations we are not allowed to investigate, as our website states,VIA STATUTE ,,,,,,,,,,,,criminal allegations complaints should be made to the POLICE. SO PRICE AWARE ACCEPTS CRIMINAL SO GIVES TO PCBIRD AWARE COULD NOT TAKE TO JCIO. SHE HAS LETTER FROM THEM There were 4 correspondence with Price , for example please see ref 5 scan picture 26 you can see police number 259327 [red ink on printer exhaused number however put in by hand] another 260861 .At this stage much later Price makes allegations of a criminal offence by me,eg ,,, forgery by me over these receipts ,saying ,,,,,,you never wrote to me., receipts forged. In CPS paper on malfeasance in public office is table of people who had been convicted , included are civil and criminal judges. We have letter from the court,,,we ignored your applications come and talk to us,,,,we have letter from lawyer,,,,,our correspondence also ignored, lawyer,,,,we have chased them via phone, can not get a reply .....numerous documents date/stamped by court, however PCBird states you have no evidence , as in perjury issue,above ?????,,,states now you should complain to JCIO and judges immune from prosecution. ???????Becomes IPCC investigation please see appendix final where police ADMIT we did not follow IPCC regu;ations ,please see ref 2 TODAY ,scan 10594 ,,,we never talked to you, and ref 3 scan 10475 10494 we sent reply to your appeal where no appeal had been made. ,,,,POLICE letter 24.7.2017 saying reply to your appeal I have made no appeal, waiting for reply to questions, the above history not in dispute can I refer to police letter scan 10475/10494,,,police admit,,,ref 3 and 4 today,,,

eg,,You then emailed in reply 22.7.2017 and accused,,,,,,, of sweeping under the carpet…..You also said will assume with no email reply to questions by 9.00 am 28.7.2017 there would be no reply and can do appeal to you.

SO SAYING POLICE DID NOT FOLLOW IN A IPCC INVESTIGATION IPCC REGULATIONS AND SENT REPLY TO AN APPEAL WHERE I HAVE NOT LODGED ONE ,,,

November 2017 application to Cotter to issue proceedings malfeasance in public as for years the court ignoring applications and correspondence where now litagation in judicial review against police,,,,eg police did not follow IPCC regulations and sent reply to an appeal where one not made,,,,,,send court N244 form [please see ref 9 today for format] plus note to HHJCotter where he asks me to make official application and to pay fee, Visit court 5.12.2017 to obtain evidence to do application to the court, The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,,,,,,,,,,eg where lady was more than helpful went to get files, then Mr Blair comes running out saying, your not looking at files, we refuse WHO IS WE ,,HHJCOTTER ?????told ,,make application to Cotter who will also ignore , utter breach of Article 6.which Cotter did,,Blair making clear court will not allow

Demand old N244 form from file, deface ,,,,line through it,,,write on it not to be sent to Cotter until new N244 send with application next day, 6.12.207,,,made under ,,,,,,,,,,,,,Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessarytime to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS ,,PAID FEE ON THESE CONDITIONS ,,,,, application sent next day via email.,6.12.2017 the court has no N244 form what i am asking court to do, as defaced it. Now 6.12.2017 sent

Series of emails confirming agreement,,,,,Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS for example email 7.12.2017

In application yesterday requested that page one of N244 lodged previously was removed and replaced with document sent to you yesterday. Can you please confirm done. ,,,,,IGNORED


Cotter in judgement states as he continues denying evidence in front of him ,,,,,police were correct should have complained to JCIO where he has letter from JCIO IN BUNDLE WE COULD NOT INVESTIGATE. FURTHER STATE VEXATIOUS TO MAKE COMPLAINT AGAINST POLICE WHERE IN APPENDIX FINAL POLICE ADMIT APPLICATION. Eg we did not follow IPCC regulations and sent reply to your appeal where one not made. Retired District judge who saw my website suggested Cotter never looked at application made under Adorison,,, again in it on N244 form was application to remove restraining order,,,,in judgement ,never mentioned. Court state we did not send as court required another fee,,,,,untrue from Adorisio,,,allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,Again as several lawyers/barristers have stated,,,,if court believed in goodwill a fee was required, and consider… Kerojarvi v Finland ,,,,,,,court must exercise diligence for an appellant not represented by a lawyer,

WHY DID COURT NOT ASK FOR A FEE. Or were they perverting course of justice not sending to Cotter,,so ,he read wrong papers.


4/ Need to appeal, could not get legal aid anywhere, NEVER rejected on facts , eg too busy ect,,,tried to get refund of court fee ,,,,,court states we did not send application.to Cotter So email to my MP Lopresti. Contacted Justice department of government told Rt Hon Buckland not your MP, get your MP to make application to Buckland. So email to MP to do this ignored, as request application to ombudsman for refund of court fee as application 6.12.2017 not read,,,,,,via statute i can not do,,,,,statute,,,complain tocourt,,,,complain then to Resolver,,,,[still before it after many years] ,,,,still not resolved ask your MP to refer to ombudsman ,refund of fee,,,,general public can not do only MP can refer,,,,MP IGNORES ALL CORRESPONDENCE,,,,from human rights case law,,,,,C. Legal aid

1. Granting of legal aid

However, the Convention is intended to safeguard rights which are practical and effective, in particular the right of access to a court. Hence, Article 6 § 1 may sometimes compel the State to provide for the assistance of a lawyer when such assistance proves indispensable for an effective access to court (Airey v. Ireland, § 26).


However, the right in question is not absolute and it may therefore be permissible to impose conditions on the grant of legal aid based in particular on the following considerations, in addition to those cited in the preceding paragraph:

the financial situation of the litigant (Steel and Morris v. the United Kingdom, § 62);

his or her prospects of success in the proceedings (ibid). YOU HAVE POLICE ADMITTING MY CLAIM


WHERE MP IGNORES ALL CORRESPONDENCE. CAN I REFER TO POLICE BUNDLE CPS EVIDENCE IN INTERVIEW WITH MP,,,,,,,I IGNORE IF I HAD ALREADY DEALT WITH ISSUE,,,,THIS IS UTTERLY NEW CASE JUST HAD JUDGEMENT THIS CORRUPT MP HAS NO EXCUSE TO IGNORE MY EMAILS


Restaining order ended anyway Feb 2018 so no need to ask permission, however required evidence to do application,,,,,,,The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,All correspondence ignored ,visit MP office told to contact Avon Law,,,,told too busy,,,,,contacted MP saying emailed court to look at file, to obtain evidence to do application, just ignored, copied Cotter into email, MP IGNORES AGAIN EMAIL HOWEVER AFTER 2 MONTHS COTTER REPLIES SAYING ASK BLAIR,,,,,KNOWING FROM ABOVE SAID NO,,,,,ASKED BLAIR SAID NO UTTER BREACH OF ARTICLE 6,,,,The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],


NEED CONFIRMATION OF EMAILS TO THE COURT WOULD PROVE MY CASE WOULD SHOW WHY I WENT TO POLICE DAY 1 WHEN SEEN BY SGT PRICE.


5.12.2017 timed 16.17 court receipt 16.17

6.12.2017 timed 15.33 15.35 15.45 court receipt same time

7.12.2017 timed 9.58 court receipt 9.59

21.12.2017 timed 11.00 court receipt 11.00.

29.12.2017 timed 4.22 know court had as HHJCotter admits he read as made under Adorisio,,,,,.

Visit court again asking same questions, talk to manager of PSU [known now support through court] who talks to courts Mr Hunt, where Hunt lies to PSU manager states will confirm in 10days if above LISTED EMAILS/ TIME in file, for example application of 6.12.2017 under ,,,,Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS IS IT IN FILE.



AGAIN UTTER BREACH OF ARTICLE 6 MS PAWSLEY COURT MANAGER REFUSES EVEN TODAY TO ANSWER QUESTION HUNT STATED TO PSU HE WOULD ANSWER AS HUNT CORRUPTS AND FRUSTRATE THE JUDICIAL PROCESS. JUST LIED TO PSU.TOOK WITNESS WITH ME TO CONFIRM AGREEMENT AT THE COURT. Court of appeal gives permission to appeal, however police/MP ignore all correspondence.




5/ In Feb 2018 restraining order ended so no need to ask permission, so ask court to look at file to obtain evidence, ignored, where matter comes before court of appeal. Police corrupt and frustrate the judicial process, ignore all correspondence,,,,CPR regulations PART 32 EVIDENCE

Notice to admit facts

32.18

(1) A party may serve notice on another party requiring him to admit the facts, or the part of the case of the serving party, specified in the notice.,,,,,,,,,,,ALL CORRESPONDENCE EMAILS IGNORED by police,,,

,LETS TRY TODAY,,,At court of appeal in live case try to issue unrelated proceedings in county court,,,,,all money claims must go through Salford county court, where refused as ANOTHER restraining order in place, contact Salford where told judiciary at Administration court Cardiff instructed if i made any applications not to issue, There was never any order , this judge acting utterly corrupt,,,,where Justice department pays 150.00 compensation, case settled then by other party, no court hearing. In website cite corruption at Administration court, no restraining order ever made, print government list of people on restraining order list, in my website, of course my name not on it. Then get emails from someone on list, know nothing about her, know nothing about case , then emails of threating nature , not really worried until letters to murder. Complaint made to police where told to block her,emails and bin any further murder letters. It appears nothing to do with me Google do website on this woman, and cite my website,,,,,this site nothing to do with me.

6/ Get call from police as never home when police call, can we interview as alledge i had stolen council parking pass sent in post and damaged other mail. Told untrue the council pass did not recognise name on letter,had sent back to council weeks ago, which S Glos council later confirmed, and other mail was delivered in Royal Mail bag, bag titled found open and damaged where from email told if police wanted evidence as obtained as damaged,,,to organise a time to collect Royal Mail bag. Then get letter scan police june,,,,,[can not show police removed from my computer to pervert course of justice however they made mistake as it was in my website if required today]which retired District Judge called appaling ,,,,undated,,,,what are allegations ?????????????So complaint to police 1.6.2020 WHAT ARE ALLEGATIONS,,,. Asked police who complained to them, enquired to Council why did you contact police where told we never contacted police we did NOTHING,,,can i quote responce,,,you emailed, we told you to post back to us, and we obtained from you, can i again thank you. What are allegations anyway not defined COULD BE NOTHING TO DO WITH MAIL. POLICE WILL NOT INFORM ME PERHAPS IOPC CAN FIND OUT.WHAT ARE ALLEGATIONS OR MY LAWYER TODAYCAN ASK POLICE. Asked police did neighbour plant on me, years ago he took caution and then today complain to police, did he place letters in my letterbox ,then saying stolen,,,did he alledge to police i had stolen,,,,,how did he know i had pass ????COMPLAINT IGNORED,,,,OVER A YEAR NOW STILL SEEKING A REPLY TO COMPLAINT OF THE 1.6.2020



7/ Threats continue via post to murder, with email comment that she had contacted police and was told,,,,,i am delusionary mentally ill in allegations against police in judicial review, [not today paragraph to show evidence however put in appendix FINAL you have judicial revew application and police admitting application],,,,,mentally ill ?????? by definition police comments are libel or slander, further refer to recent court examination not mentally ill. Complaint made on the 17.10.2020 where police refuse to answer complaints, further letters sent threat to murder,,,, police where again told to bin,evidence sent to them over murder threat.


8/ From scan picture 29 REF 1 23.11.2019 througout 2020 the issue of perverting course of justice, a miscarriage of justice not urgent, now my life at risk, eg no reply to complaint 17.10.2020 ,,,,IPCC informed of problem 20.11.2020 aware of issue,,,,Marsh told 2.12. 2020 of oil in police doorway to get something done, ,,eg From a garage have obtained 5L cans of old oil to throw in police/court doorways,,,,will have my day in court before the end. …..he is aware of threat to cause criminal damage ,,,,no need to repeat here see start of document numerous quotes,,,knew threat took no action, goaded into offending. So oil in police doorway 4.1.2021 , request for lawyer refused while in custody, kept in police custody over 10 hours,,,no lawyer. Told later to staff severe claustophobic , seen by police nurse, where placed in exercise yard. We have group who shop for reductions at night at Asda, knew what Ms X did ,however only when talked about arrest was aware as part of her work visit Patchway station on regularly basis and special cells for claustophobics, complaint to police told duty sergeant was unaware but STAFF were as put in exercise yard, so issue appeal to police complaint ,,,, you can quess appeaIGNORED STILL TODAY WAITING FOR REPLY. Correspondence 19.12.2020 more letters sent to police, threats of murder, told to just bin, told police oil in their doorway if nothing done over threat to murder.Further asked would they talk to this woman was willing to put her comments in my website, underneath restraining order to show her point of view,,,,asked police again in 2021 do not know if ever contacted.


9/ Still getting letters to murder, so Marsh aware of threat,told in email 27.1.2021,,,oil in MP doorway,QUOTE ,,, Caused criminal damage at Patchway police station,[poured 5l can of oil in doorway] bet they have not informed media of offence, would not want why action taken, only way to get story out, [a court hearing] Tory MP Lopresti and police and local police PCC Mountstevens aware i would do this ,if correspondence ignored, they called my bluff knowing criminal series of offences will be made..... they will not want before a court, they will try to issue a caution, [will be refused] or as barrister stated,,,,will release without charge no public interest ,,,,will need to offend at another police station, or MP office [5L again of old oil] until sent to prison to die. Have one opening, at moment ,vindictive police have issued court summons as went through red light 1.2 seconds ,,,,yes 1.2 secs ,,,,max speed ,,,,wet road dangerous to brake ,,,,action taken due to complaints historic to police, given option no action if attend a day course,,,,easy way to conclude,,,,,however can defend via trial to bring out issues,not only above defence however just vindictive prosecution,,,police will take me to court over this,,,,,1.2 seconds,,,however historic evidence ,,,,,have lawyer in letter stating we commited perjury,,,,too late for you to do anything about it now, please see below.....we have court saying we commited offence malfeasance in public office however police refuse to deal with ADMITTED criminal offence. ,,,,,,,,,however take me to court over 1.2 seconds,,,,,WE HAVE AS IN EBRAHIMI CASE IN BRISTOL CORRUPTION BETWEEN POLICE AND COURT AS CRIMINAL OFFENCES IGNORED,,,ask MP for help, however as corrupt and bent as he has done for years ignore correspondence in pocket of police and the courts, this document in my website ,will follow up with new website www.jackloprestimpcorrupt.com say if facts untrue sue me ....MP Jack Lopresti,for example in last 18 months 32 emails all ignored, recently confirmed he would ignore all correspondence any subject ….UNQUOTE .So Marsh aware of murder threats where quoted Erahimi case. Did not want to offend further email 11.2.2021 to Marsh ,in detail explaining murder threats.Took copy to Sgt Price to make sure as scan picture 29 did not want to offend, just wanted to be arrested over threats to stop being murdered, in document 11.2.2021 outlined being followed ect worried about murder.. Have historic recording with Ms Jones TJ front staff Patchway police station, where gets involved although nothing to do with her,, beng dealt with by another member of staff, from police papers today, when leaving letter 11.2.2021 being dealt with by another member of staff, TJ can not help herself ,,, gets involved,,,,police refuse to give receipt for letter. Told police/PCC not to call my bluff ,, pouring of oil,,,told would offend,,where concerned for my life poured oil in MP doorway, 18.2.2021. Presented at police station 19.2.2021 to be arrested, being dealt with by another member of staff where TJ gets involved again.,,,,can not help herself. Ask why i want to arrested, told threat to murder this can not go on no longer, where Marsh /PCC/Price involved ,,,asked where i had offended and what i had done,GIVEN she checks states not on system no record of any offence wait for reply from Sgt Price. She did not know initally where offence took place where person sat next toTJ both of us pointing along A38 to show her where Woodlands was situated. Lawyers Reeds state your entry, and leaving 19.2.2021 from recording and CCTV they have record of movements and what was said. Recording would show what was said, would show movements, told speaking too quite move closer as also with mask on can not hear you, and what your saying,was not ranting and raving,,,. Present barrister state police have destoyed evidence. Gave examples, TJ will get away with this, police have destroyed evidence, however she states,,,,,did not understand what he was saying,,,,she keeps saying not on system, wait for reply from Price ,,,,,where i state it would not happen, would you say not on system go away if i said i had thrown petrol in MP doorway,,, TJ does not want to admit theoretical issue,,,,told it would not occur so states ,,,,,he would not inform me why he wanted to be arrested,,,,,she was told of offence where she stated not on system,,,,reason for my reply,,,,would not occur would you say go away,if i said thrown petrol,,,,,,,,after all threats to murder would any jury believe i would not say why wanted to be arrested,,,,, further if not told not on system , not reported, why do i taunt MP in less than a hour as he had not reported as confirmed by TJ ,,,,,,,,in MP statement in todays papers, there was NEVER threats to us. In respect to letter to Marsh PCC Price 11.2.2021,,,to make sure gives detail of murder threats, further aware of offending 18.2.2021 to get something done,,,,,POLICE WOULD NOT DEAL WITH ISSUE OR MP [ALSO SENT 11.2.2021 LETTER VIA EMAIL] OR IPCC. So offended fear for my life as email 27.1.2021 police aware oil in MP doorway. So in desperation do you get criminal record,,,,end of your medical career or do you get murdered.


10/ Arrested at 11.45 pm threat to cause arson. Front door damaged, retired police officer suggested caused by police baton, Told on your arrest throwing oil in police doorway, 4.1.2021 we did not want background before the court,[murder threat] so dropped case, WE NEED THEREFORE TO TAKE FINGERPRINTS ECT AGAIN AS WE REMOVED AS NOT CHARGING. BUT THIS IS FORCE AWARE OFFENCE WOULD OCCUR TOOK NO ACTION,,,,GOADED ME INTO OFFENDING THEN DO NOT WANT TO PUT EVIDENCE TO A COURT AS THEY WOULD BE EXPOSED.Assaulted by PC Snell ripping handcuffs up and down, me screaming in pain, request for boby cam ignored, understand lawyer making new application. Lawyers Reeds state police have evidence which would prove my case what was said, my barrister informs me police have removed,,,,comes before interview no threat was made,,,,to prove my case did never want to be arrested, would always give police written notice so could be arrested over threat, please see scan picture 29.Asked when document sent to Marsh ,,,,,top of page in scan picture 029 ref 1 today was in bundle i bought with me yesterday , police statement nonsense suggest correspondence sent on the 19.2.2021 this was just misunderstanding. Further evidence as police asked for copy on the 20.2.2021 , first time presented to police was at interview. Interview at 2.00 pm charged, can i refer as above to facts where police admit to facts raised, eg murder issue complaint 17.10.2020 [error in todays police papers complaint 27.10.2020 no ,,,,,complaint 17.10.2020 which was ignored no complaint 27.10.2020]. Did not help as explaining facts where lawyers Reeds state,,,,,,heard enough have to go, in papers under exhibite7808 today while in cell produce above document where it states,,,,,INTERVIEW TERMINATED EARLY. Was told about 4.00 pm just about to be released, asked if wanted food told no as just about to go home. About 8.00 pm complain as not released ,hungary, where told should have eaten at 6.00pm. Not released for about another 4 hours.


11/ Coming home my medical books all over floor, my stethoscope on floor. , the wires ripped out of computer router, and FIRST thing i did was look in filing cabinett X where my late parents wedding rings were, also related items, eg my late mothers purse, no issue with police, no allegations nothing missing , however filing cabinett unlocked. Can i explain as one of my last epidemiologist projects , for NHS , was looking at all people in Bristol who had died before their time eg under 65, as having medical records in house must be secure. Was supplied with 12 filing 4 draw cabinets . Had made mistake before where locked with key inside, went to call out locksmith, where told code on plunger and could supply a key, told to go through routine,in future your not first one to do this, ,,,,talk to yourself, if openedl ,,,leaving filing cabinets,,,,,,,have you key left hand,,,yes,,,then can lock,,,do this every time would never leave unlocked,,,why have police gone into cabinets. Remember arrested over threat to cause arson,,,,,why have they taken card from camera of photographs taken,,,,,as barrister who saw my website,,,,fishing ,utterly illegal,,,,anything to convict,,,,child pornagrahic images ???????,,,,remember from statute can only take if relevant to ,,, why charged, As barrister said who saw my website,,,you were arrested over a threat to cause arson at MP office, if threat made to MP he would have email to show to police, what extra would be on your computer, .OR WAS THIS TAKEN TO PERVERT COURSE OF JUSTICE. Remember arrested as threat to cause arson, recently car repair at home ,trademan also will state from front door right in front of you are 2 windows into garage, where there is a 5L can of petrol, can be seen through window ,[please see scans 19 20 and 21 ] why was petrol not taken.. Then get letter scan picture 35 not compatible with scan picture 32 and 33. Police have taken scan 35 ,,,also computer parts and software not declared in scan 32 and 33. Police state further we had taken computer parts, can i help doing research at university on lung carcinoma [cancer] supervisors a consult surgeon, and consultant radiologist. In skip were 2 matching tv monitors , where given permission to take, marked university property,,,,can i suggest assumed stolen, taken, now know not stolen so scan picture 35 to return. Have numerous back up USB sticks where 7 missing and paperwork what was on each removed. Also other software taken if police want to remove virus on computer.Barrister who saw my website suggested where police back for second time , CCTV turned off, Asked police what computer parts and software were taken, where they ignore email, took third party to confirm not returned on collection. Talking to my lawyer where she is asking for return. Had call do you know your toolbox gone, will never see again,,,,was locked can not understand why not break lock lie through teeth say was broken when we entered house than steal my property.


12/ Can i define computers.


a/Old Tower computer,,,20 years old

b/ When Tower was purchased there was i in 30 chance of obtaining 300.00 off another computer so used to buy laptop,,,,,was the 1 in 30 lucky one

c/ From old age pensioner computer club was given laptop ,,,,,where organiser backed up b/ and put data on this computer…..now not working ,,,done as only 10 years old b/ much older...

d/ Computer shop late 2020 backed up data on c/ and put onto new lap top. To save carrying around this laptop also purchased a harddrive where data recovered from c/ copied on to it, size 4 x2.5 x 0.3 inch. Eg identical copy of what was put on d/computer. CAN WE DEFINE AS FATAL EVIDENCE HARDDRIVE [FEH]


Police were not interested in arson threat , TJ was told it would not occur, however from front door you can look into garage through window and see 5l can of petrol which was not taken.?????? Arrested assaulted by Snell, waiting for bobycam where within 20 secs PCCollett [came with Snell] reporting back to assume station states,,,,found electrical,,,,.thats what they came for to pervert course of justice to remove evidence from computer.Where computer from above a/ seized thats what they came for. Coming home 20.2.2021 computer a/ missing ,wires ripped out of computer router. Also lawyer asked for search video cam does it show wires being ripped out , if not as barrister who saw my website suggested did police come back again. MP utterly corrupt and dishonest in earlier emails state,,,,,,our office was never involved in your historic problems with the court ,so made note of emails as evidence, when following day went to print, they had gone, all emails with MP from mid 2014 and earlier removed, from FEH we have missing evidence with MP back to 2011 all of this removed, as far as MP is concerned and police are concerned alright remove evidence, however you forgot Michael Cobbs emails [MP SECRETARY] where we have his emails over historic legal case.,,,,say to MP your utterly dishonest YOU WERE INVOLVED.As barrister stated who saw my website police aware only very old documents on Tower, used mainley as other computers would not accept scanner, eg required if i need to scan. As he said looking for anything to convict ,,,fishing,,,need to go back to other computers, So c/ not working will not produce a picture,,,,while computer b/ due to virus when you switch on just get error message. New computer uses Windows 10, problems using computer shop will confirm asked them a few days before arrest to remove virus so i could use as problems with new laptop, told no charge will give tutorial on new system., no need to spend money on removal. Computers b/ and c/ on bed after arrest, computer b/ lid open, need to confirm with police videocam of first search, understand lawyer already requested evidence….THEY HAVE REMOVED VIRUS from computer. b/ Can i refer to above scan police june,,,this removed , All computers at home how can data be altered, this is IOPC expertise, i know i talked to a company, where told as hacked in could control computer,,,,gave example say i go to library,,,,,all you need is log in details, do not need actual computer.,,,,what else have they altered.Again lucky for evidence the old age pensioners computer club , expert, when putting data on computer 2 to computer 3 was asked to please keep record on hard drive for me, shows all documents,,,,[go to documents type in search police,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,all documents now gone,,,,,,however have record on backed up harddrive of computer club.


13/ So comes before court, probation issue today,,,,threat of arson,,,,where recorded evidence destroyed by police TJ shown as witness utterly dishonest,,,,,did not know why he offended at MP office ,,,yes you were you said after asking person sat next to you, where Woodlands was situated,,,,told thrown oil,,,,told not on system, offence not reported wait for reply over threats to murder from Sgt Price,,where i said to her would not occur however if i said i had thrown petrol in MP office ,would you say not on system go away,,,,,where i taunt MP within the hour as not reported,,,,,HOW DID I KNOW IF NOT TOLD BY THIS CORRUPT PERSON, CAN SEE WHY POLICE HAVE DROPPED CASE Police will not want her in the dock, crossexamined where they drop case, on record today is just criminal damage, where March aware would occur, took no action, can i refer to start of this document, offended due to threats to be murdered…...MARSH TOLD THESE OFFENCES WOULD OCCUR GOADED INTO OFFENDING DID NOTHING AWARE OFFENCE WOULD OCCUR



  • Did the officer realise that those consequences were ‘likely’ and yet went on to take the risk?





Recklessness: the defendant foresees that particular consequences may occur and proceeds with the given conduct, not caring whether those consequences actually occur or not.


  • Criminal negligence: the defendant did not actually foresee that the particular consequences would flow from his actions, but a reasonable person, in the same circumstances, would have foreseen those consequences.





14/ Due to statute police must report allegations of criminal activity, corruption, assault to the IOPC [independant office of police conduct] ,,,,,stealing my property compare scan picture 32 /33 and 35,,,,where my computer parts and software stolen,,,,look at computer evidence where from THIRD PARTY evidence can prove corruption, POLICE perverting course of justice removing computer records,,,,where police state ,,,,,do not understand with threat,,,,,do in 2 pages maximum if we do not unserstand ,will bin and as usual will ignore any future correspondence, in respect to statute referral to the IOPC.


15/ Not looking for any favours , knew before leaving oil in doorway would get criminal record, however more important was to stop being murdered. Hoped something would be done over threat, even in 2019 scan picture 29 to pour oil ,,,arrested,,,then murder issue arises from above Marsh aware oil in police doorway,,,,did not get result eg arrested, so Marsh aware oil in MP office,,,,Mountstevens PCC like Marsh told in email,,,,,not to call my bluff,,,,hoped threat to murder addresed ,,,, put before court say after threat to pour oil in MP office, [no actual pouring of oil] ,,,,discharged say good behaviour over 12 months, so could get on with my life, now for example in respect to Covid and as medic told as criminal record can not accept your offer to vacinate free of charge for us.


16 This vindicitive force now taking me to court as going through red light at 1.2 seconds. Making things as difficult as possible instead of hearing in Bristol wants it heard in Bath. Thought end of it in 2020, where had option to go to afternoon police workshop ,where case would then be dropped, however as i stated to them in normal situation correct way, however put forward anyway defence, as below, however had to go for hearing to bring out threats to murder, where police will do nothing about it. Will use this document at hearing. From above group of people going to Asda for reductions, did not know woman well, however told knee problem, difficult walking, wanted to go to hospital to see mother who was terminally ill. Said i woud do, however next day was MOT if failed could not do. Had to be on time for MOT ,,,late, where from records went through red light at 1.2 seconds,,,,,eg equal to one car in front of me, anyway surface wet would be dangerous heavy breaking . As retired epidemiologist was aware of Covid, had organised, told police plastic sheet between front and back seats taped in place for her to sit in back. As barrister said who saw my wesite police can amend charge, could include breach of Covid orders, with extra fine of 200.00 due to Covid breach when go for hearing.


This was issue unchanged from above, see prosecution made by Marsh ,yes Marsh aware of murder threats to me ,who does nothing. Police warn over breach of Covid regulations, after defence filed. Accept as barrister said charge can be amended,,,,,say to police ask for 200.00 EXTRA at hearing,in Bath will show what a pathetic vindictive people you are, can i quote,,,,,DNOWDNT would explain at hearing, with email to myself today what DNOWDNT stands for.


17/ Reference murder threat this woman still following me, Starts also again in last few weeks ,please see par 6 above,,,,STRANGE numerous letters in last few weeks for neighbour,,,,has he complained to police planting on me. Before allegations to damage of mail, contacted police sometime ago to contact Patchway sorting office to collect , these letters waiting to be collected do not want allegations mail damaged.


PROPOSED LETTER FROM MS ROWLAND TO CPS ACCEPT SHE WILL WRITE AS SHE FEELS FIT HOWEVER PLEASE ASK SHE ADDRESS THESE ISSUES.CAN I PLEASE HAVE COPY OF LETTER SENT ,,,,can we ask for reply by the 25.5.2021 as required for interview 27.5.2021,,,,


My client due to talk to Ms Slocombe on the 27.5.2021 at probation service , over why commited damage, eg threats to him of murder, which police ignored. My client warned to cooperate with probation, and ask you also as even handed to do the same, producing evidence for probation,Can i cite Human Rights case law,,,,

An issue with regard to access to evidence may arise under Article 6 insofar as the evidence at issue is relevant for the applicant’s case, specifically if it had an important bearing on the charges held against the applicant. This is the case if the evidence was used and relied upon for the determination of the applicant’s guilt or it contained such particulars which could have enabled the applicant to exonerate oneself or have the sentence reduced. The relevant evidence in this context is not only evidence directly relevant to the facts of the case, but also other evidence that might relate to the admissibility, reliability and completeness of the former (Rowe and Davis v. the United Kingdom [GC], § 66; Mirilashvili v. Russia, § 200; b. Adversarial hearing As a rule, Article 6 § 1 requires that the prosecution authorities disclose to the defence all material evidence in their possession for or against the accused (Rowe and Davis v. the United Kingdom [GC], § 60).

1/ Can i refer to my client picketing at the court in 2017 , DIRECTLY RELATED TO ISSUE WITH MP ,,,where barrister he gave leaflet to told him to report to police malfeasance in public office, confirmed in letter from Insp O Mahony ref 2 today.,,,scan 10594 So abundantly clear to Ms Slocombe in ref 2 it states,,,,,,,,,,,,,malfeasance in public office ,,,,,,,,,,,,,judges and court officers,,,,,however does not state what judges and staff court accused of, can you please confirm, for Ms Slocombe. Need in own words accept in preaction protocol for judicial review, and actual judicial review application, its stated, however you may has statute disputed allegation,,,,as court advised you should if dispute facts. In your judgement stated report to JCIO , and judges immune from prosecution .Sgt Price asked my client to send evidence can i refer to police property receipts number 259327 ref 5 today and 260861 , we have others. Sgt Price stance she never obtained letters and allegations of forgery of receipts. Can you confirm stance that these receipts forged, if you did have correspondence could you please send me a copy.

2/ On the 1.6.2020 over a year now complaint made MACVFQVM to you, can i please have reply for Ms Slocombe. Again complaint related to murder threat made 17.10.2020 ref MAC-VZJDG again can we have a reply please to complaint for Ms Slocombe, still waiting for reply over 7 months.

3/ We have murder threats complaint 24.9.2020, where sent her letters to you , told to bin letters in future and block her from emailing, further evidence 19.12.2020 sent and in email to Marsh PCC Sgt Price 11.2.2021 gave you details. Confusing limited evidence, my client in discussion with Met police told she contacted US never issue to contact her, see correspondence with Bridewell station Bristol. Your aware of threat to murder, in TJ statement states my client told her this can not go on any longer these threats to murder, where told to await reply from Sgt Price of his letter 11.2.2021 as issue of murder in his document of the 11.2.2021. Could you please outline what action you took over threats to murder, for example over 3 months since his letter to Marsh/PCC /Sgt Price or is this a case of ,,,Did the officer Marsh realise that those consequences were ‘likely’ and yet went on to take the risk? We ask for reply to complaint of 17.10.2020 asdirecly related, this woman told by you, my client is delusionary .mentally ill in making judicial review application against us, could you please outline history of threat to murder,,,,for example was this woman ever questioned,,,,,or was this a case as in Ereahimi case ,where aware of threat to murder,in 2020,,,,,,eg email 11.2.2021 however police ignored.

4/ On the 2.12.2020 you were aware for example asking reply to complaint 17.10.2020 concerning murder threats, that if nothing done my client would pour oil in police doorway so he could be arrested to bring to a court to stop murder threats. You were aware of threat however ,,Did the officer Marsh realise that those consequences were ‘likely’ and yet went on to take the risk? Where my client goaded into offending. On the 19.12.2020 was Marsh aware if murder threats not dealt with, oil in police door way, offended 4.1.2021did not work out to get arrested,,,so email 17.1.2021 told oil in MP doorway, in letter 11.2.2021 desperate not to offend, police given second chance to act to arrest over oil in MP office,,,Did the officer Marsh realise that those consequences were ‘likely’ and yet went on to take the risk? ,,,,,eg no arrest over threats

5/ My client produced compelling evidence concerning police corruption and criminal activity, where as statute police must refer to the IOPC, in his rejected correspondence was threatened ,,,,,must be in 2 pages, untrue, if you did not make clear we will bin and ignore future correspondence . A new request to you to refer to IOPC , can you confirm so Ms Slocombe can report, that application has been sent to the IOPC , if refuse to refer can you please inform Ms Slocombe why you refuse to refer.

6/ In respect to murder threats, my client suggested to resolve, you ask her to conclude if she wished to put statement in my clients website under restraining order list,in my clients website ,,,[2020 and 2021] did you ever talk to her, or was my client emails ignored.

7/ Previosly i have requested [Ms Rowlands told me had requested ]on the ,,,,,,,,,,,for boby cam of arrest and seizure of property, can you please ensure i have 48 hours before my clients interview with probation.

8/ On arrest 19.2.2021 my client told did not expect you back, thought we had frightened you, 4.1.2021 while in custody, We did not want evidence before open court, [can do today] so dropped case , so need to do fingerprints ect again as statute we have removed as taking no action. My client never informed case was dropped, could you please supply paperwork that case was closed by you. So you were aware offence would occur,,2020 ,oil in policestation doorway took no action over threat,,,,goaded my client into offending over non action over murder issue,,,,my client offended,,,then you refuse to prosecute ?????????????????????

9/We have issue in CPS bundle, alledge correspondence sent to Marsh on the 19.2.2021 can you confirm not sent

10/ Lawyers Reeds state that you have evidence on recording CCTV of my clients entry and leaving station on the 19.2.2021, which would prove his case, as he maintained from day 1 , can you confirm evidence has been destroyed. To

11/ Can i refer to scan picture 32 33 and 35, Ms Slocombes reference 6 7 and 8. Can you confirm scan picture 35 is your document, further it states besides official seizure picture 32 33 you took computer parts and software. My client asked for details of these, knowing taken, before collection of his property however his email ignored, so took witness to station. We asked for return on the [lawyer informed me she had asked] ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,however obtained no reply, can you please explain why. Further as picture 32 33 was other items,,,,,eg new bottle of chainsaw oil can we please ask for return.

12/ In later discussion with barrister my client stated did not cause this damage, reason he pleaded not guilty .It then arose confusion, my client saying did not cause this,,,,,and barrister saying,,,,not sure they are saying this,,,,think this was just reflection from sun. With reference to each of CPS evidence photographs could you preciosly state whar area you alleged my client damaged. From expert witness my client contacted,,,,the WORSE thing, utter incompetance was pour boiling water over it, and cites not only his view, but from internet,,,,to remove stain in wood use strong detergent.

NEWS STORY FOR MEDIA….This is repeat of Profuma sex affair case Have been forced into obtaining a criminal record to get this story out,end of therefore of my medical career,,,offered free of charge to vacinate Covid 19 6 days /week however informed via vetting now would not be accepted,,,Police and courts [civil not criminal] believe if we ignore correspondence we can get away with a miscarriage of justice, utter breach of Article 6,,,,,The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,,,,,,,,,Todays issue over restraining order due to complaint against police, as vexatious ,you have below the actual allegations in judicial review pasted, and in police own words admitting allegations, is this first time this has occured,,,,NO,,,court as you will see already in another vexatious restraining order paid compensation to me. Mirojuhys v Latvia …………………fairness of proceedings always assessed by examining them in entirety so that an isolated incident may not be sufficient to conclude proceedings as a whole unfair…. ,,,,,,consider above not first time,,,,Asked Tory MP Lopresti for help eg Legal Aid /ombudsman all correspondence as he confirms he will ignore,,,,knowing miscarriage of justice. Caused criminal damage at Patchway police station,[poured 5l can of oil in doorway] bet they have not informed media of offence, would not want why action taken, only way to get story out, [a court hearing] Tory MP Lopresti and police and local police PCC Mountstevens aware i would do this ,if correspondence ignored, they called my bluff knowing criminal series of offences will be made..... they will not want before a court, they will try to issue a caution, [will be refused] or as barrister stated,,,,will release without charge no public interest ,,,,will need to offend at another police station, or MP office [5L again of old oil] until sent to prison to die. Have one opening, at moment ,vindictive police have issued court summons as went through red light 1.2 seconds ,,,,yes 1.2 secs ,,,,max speed ,,,,wet road dangerous to brake ,,,,action taken due to complaints historic to police, given option no action if attend a day course,,,,easy way to conclude,,,,,however can defend via trial to bring out issues,not only above defence however just vindictive prosecution,,,police will take me to court over this,,,,,1.2 seconds,,,however historic evidence ,,,,,have lawyer in letter stating we commited perjury,,,,too late for you to do anything about it now, please see below.....we have court saying we commited offence malfeasance in public office however police refuse to deal with ADMITTED criminal offence. ,,,,,,,,,however take me to court over 1.2 seconds,,,,,WE HAVE AS IN EBRAHIMI CASE IN BRISTOL CORRUPTION BETWEEN POLICE AND COURT AS CRIMINAL OFFENCES IGNORED,,,ask MP for help, however as corrupt and bent as he has done for years ignore correspondence in pocket of police and the courts, this document in my website ,will follow up with new website www.jackloprestimpcorrupt.com say if facts untrue sue me ....MP Jack Lopresti,for example in last 18 months 32 emails all ignored, recently confirmed he would ignore all correspondence any subject …...my email……………...[part quote]

  1. My MP s office states you should have responce in 3 days to emails to us,,,,,after 2 weeks still no responce to emails. States woman dealing with this in Friday, will assume with no email on t,,he 18.12.2020 there will be no reply. State we do not know how to deal with matter. WE MAY ASK SIMPLE QUESTIONS IS THIS NOT CASE OF ....WE DO NOT KNOW HOW TO DEAL WITH MATTER ,,,,,OR WE WILL NOT DEAL WITH MATTER.....SIMPLE QUESTION.

  2. Well issue is

  3. a/ Ask my MP to put papers to Hon Buckland as ask state to provide Legal Aid. The statute via Human Right Act in scan evidence 2. [in my website]

  4. b/ In scan evidence one my MP can see in own words the police admit my claim to the court, eg this was a IPCC investigation and we did not follow IPCC regulations. Further admit by police we sent reply to your appeal,where one not lodged. Have one outstanding item ,,,,as Buckland would require merits of case, before State giving legal aid, ,,,,,why did i come to police day 1.

  5. c/ We have further issue complaints 1.6.2020 17.10.2020 that police ignored, where asked MP to obtain replies .

  6. d/ We ask MP to present related issue to ombudsman, where we do not know court stance, where ask him to ask court, as he would require merits to refer to ombudsman. ,details in scan evidence 4./6

  7. P JONES

  8. Lopresti,,,, knowing miscarriage of justice, as asked State for take one example ,,,to provide Legal Aid, ,,,,,,,,via statute i can not refer to ombudsman ONLY LOPRESTI can do this,refuses ,,,,GIVES NO REASON WHY REFUSED JUST IGNORES EMAILS

  9. C. Legal aid

  10. 1. Granting of legal aid

  11. However, the Convention is intended to safeguard rights which are practical and effective, in particular the right of access to a court. Hence, Article 6 § 1 may sometimes compel the State to provide for the assistance of a lawyer when such assistance proves indispensable for an effective access to court (Airey v. Ireland, § 26). civil courts, police involved , where tortued in police custody these trying to sweep matter under the carpet. Police aware i suffer from clauustraphobia, for example after cholecystectomy operation many years ago tearful as wanted to go home next day to recover, however 4.1.2021 held in cells for 10 hours no referal to lawyer, for records at end put in exercise yard, as clautraphobic, however only given 5 mins. Tuesday shopping day, specific day due to Covid 19,,,group of friends go for reductions done between 6.00 and 7,00 pm at supermarket,now group go different days. Others in group go other nights due to social distancing,to shop reductions as govenment instructions,,,, inform Ms X [in bubble] about arrest day before, knew what she did, however unaware until told due to her job visit Patchway police station on regular basis, where told special cells with windows, for people suffering from claustaphobia….however police felt fit to tortuer me. For years ,,courts /police ignore correspondence , Lopresti ignores as he has done for years, only option offending to bring matter out at court hearing. From proceddings [please see relevance later an issue relevant even today] had cited court restraining order list[i am not on list] list where woman on list sends violent threating emails...do not know woman. She contacts police where told i should have not cited her in list,police continue,,,my allegations against police are delusionary ,he is mentally ill, please see below ….will paste actual application [the allegations] in judicial review and you will see there are 2 elements, where POLICE IN OWN WORDS ADMIT APPLICATION. SO APPLICATION AGAINST US DELUSIONARY HE IS MENTALLY ILL AS MADE ?????? YOU ADMIT IN OWN WORDS THIS WAS A IPCC [independent police complaint commision] INVESTIGATION AND WE DID NOT FOLLOW IPCC REGULATIONS AND SENT REPLY TO AN APPEAL WHERE NO APPEAL MADE. SO THIS APPLICATION DELUSINARY MENTALLY ILL. ????????????Make official complaint about libel comments,female barrister and judge who saw my website stated ‚police no time limit to reply to complaint, however via statute should be done ….in reasonable time, made 17.10.2020,,,,[over 2 months ago] also other complaint 1.6.2020 which police believe if we ignore it will also go away, police they ignore complaints, South Glos Council confirm these libel comments now made to them,,, Corruption between above parties which is repeat of parties in Profuma affair. The Profuma affair a long time interest of mine at time for example my letters to Christine Keeler, and media, one reply from national newspaper Keeler was not innocent party in this see enclosed advert from magazine,,,,,see Christine Keeler take penis in rectum only homosexuals do this 18 dollars see 8mm film.

  12. CORRUPTION PROFUMA,,,BETWEEN COURTS AND POLICE WITH TORY MP INVOLVED AS WE HAVE TODAY...ALL PERVERTING COURSE OF JUSTICE KNOWING MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE. ALREADY CRIMINAL DAMAGE AT POLICE STATIONS STARTED 4.1.2021 WILL CONTINUE EVERY WEEK in FEB AS ONLY WAY TO SHOW CORRUPTION MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE ALSO DAMAGE AT COURT AND OTHER PLACES [LOPRESTIS OFFICE ] LATER WHERE MP JACK LOPRESTI/ POLICE ,,COURTS,,, PCC OF POLICE MS MOUNTSTEVENS AWARE IN 2020 I WOULD TAKE MATTER INTO MY OWN HANDS IF CORRESPONDENCE IGNORED, WHERE ABOVE HAPPY FOR ME TO OBTAIN A CRIMINAL RECORD.. REPEAT OF HISTORIC CASE OF CHRISTINE KELLER WHERE HAD CONTACT WITH HER AND INVOLVED ANOTHER TORY MP JOHN PROFUMA WHICH BOUGHT DOWN GOVERNMENT AT TIME , BARRISTER DID WARN ME AT TIME



IN OWN WORDS POLICE ...WE DID NOT FOLLOW IPCC REGULATIONS IN THIS IPCC INVESTIGATION AND WE SENT REPLY TO YOUR APPEAL,,,,,YOU HAVE NO EVIDENCE OF MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE COURTS IGNORING APPLICATIONS AND CORRESPONDENCE FOR YEARS ,,[,CORRUPT POLICE HAD LETTER FROM COURT,,,,WE IGNORED YOUR APPLICATIONS COME AND TALK TO US,,,]WHERE NO APPEAL LODGED. IS THIS NOT AS WHEN STEVEN WARD PROSECUTED IN PROFUMA CASE ,,,AS CORRUPTION BETWEEN POLICE AND COURTS. WE HAVE TODAY JCIO [judicial conduct investigation office] IN 2017,,,SAYING POLICE AND COURT WRONG, VIA STATUTE WE CAN NOT INVESTIGATE COMPLAINTS IF INITIAL CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS,,,,JCIO,,,PASTE FROM THEIR WEBSITE,,,ALSO SENT TO ME



We cannot investigate

Allegations of criminal activity for example, perverting the course of justice , [Eaga case perjury/malfeasance in public office ] (criminal allegations should be directed to the POLICE ),,,THE EAGA CASE IS THE PERJURY CASE SGT PRICE ON RECORDING STATES SHE WOULD NOT GIVE TO OFFICER TO INVESTIGATE IF NOT A CRIMINAL OFFENCE,,,WHERE BRUSHED OFF BY POLICE,,AS WARNED BY BARRISTER WHO SAW ME PICKETING AT THE COURT from COPWATCH

For most people the police complaints process is a depressing waste of time. Not only do the police get to investigate themselves and help fellow officers escape misconduct charges, they get to handle appeals to…[further quotes from paper below ,,,,]



When it was recently reported that the police only investigate 4 out of 10 crimes, the Home Office responded by stating: “We expect the police to investigate ALL crime.” [TODAY ADMITTED PERJURY MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE]

And if the police start reciting huge chunks of legislation in a bid to get rid of you, don’t be afraid to remind them that it is not their job to interpret the law. It is their job to enforce it. The Home Office, the government and the courts are there to explain the fineries of legislation, not some lazy cop who has probably memorized it by rote just to help him pass a Sergeant’s exam……

I try to be independant, due to claustophobia could never live in a care home,for example from GP records stated would die on tennis court not in a home,,, from any exercise have become a drug addict, as exercise releases neurotransmitters the endorphines which i need,,,,,ALL i need short input eack week,,,accept would be arrested, claustraphobic would have to get out of cell,,forced to take actions by police/courts/Lopresti. Assumed seen by lawyer in a few hours, did not sleep night before,,,could sleep in cell for a few hours,,to pass time before seen by lawyer,however now 10 hours can not sleep,,, no access to a lawyer,,,,,Accept by running into cell wall until unconscious however may get brain damage, may be then not independant,,,,where hope therefore to die in police custody. ,,,,,,,WE HAVE POLICE IN JUDGEMENT SAYING REASON WE DID NOT INVESTIGATE YOUR COMPLAINT MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE AS YOU SHOULD HAVE GONE TO JCIO HOWEVER UTTERLY AWARE FROM ABOVE JCIO COULD NOT INVESTIGATE,,,THE JCIO DOCUMENT SENT TO THEM ;;;WHERE JUDICIARY WRONGLY CORRUPTION BETWEEN POLICE AND COURT STATING SHOULD HAVE GONE TO JCIO,,,,,THEY HAVE LETTER FROM JCIO STATING WE CAN NOT INVESTIGATE,,,AS IN PROFUMA CASE CORRUPTION BETWEEN POLICE AND COURTS.ARE THE JUDICIARY /POLICE ,,,,,,DENYING EVIDENCE BEFORE IT ??????

Obligation incumbent on the administrative authorities: the appellant must have access to the relevant documents in the possession of the administrative authorities, if necessary via a procedure for the disclosure of documents (McGinley and Egan v. the United Kingdom, §§ 86 and 90). Were the respondent State, without good cause, to prevent appellants from gaining access to documents in its possession which would have assisted them in defending their case,or to falsely deny their existence, this would have the effect of denying them a fair hearing, in violation of Article 6 § 1 ..…

ASKED POLICE IN 2017 SAME QUESTION TODAY WHY DID I COME TO SGT PRICE

WE ASK POLICE TODAY FOR ,,,RELEVANT DOCUMENTS ASKING FOR YEARS AGO ..Obligation incumbent on the administrative authorities: the appellant must have access to the relevant documents in the possession of the administrative authorities, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Media will need to see issue ,,,details in my website.,synopsis below. Female QC barrister and judge who saw my website stated in cases there is cornerstone issue,,,,take theoretical case i am sitting as a judge man accused as robbing a bank, however case fails,,,,,,,,,,,,,on day in closed prison, your issue why you went to police day 1. There is no dispute here as from recording with Sgt Price told to paste CPS document on malfeasance in public office and within submit my complaint, called FEDJCAB document, [title describes issue,,fatal evidence document judiciary corrupt and bent ]this document in statute document pre action protocol document for judicial review , further document had to be produced via statute Annex A paragraphs scan annex a in my website eg,,

paragraph 7/ THE ISSUE [ANNEX A STATUTE PARAGRAPHS]

BCC [Bristol county court ] for years ignoring applications, criminal offence malfeasance in public office, .resulting in one incident of miscarriage of justice. Complaint to defendants [POLICE] who refuse to investigate.

The police have courts admitting facts,,,,,,,,,,,,we ignored your applications come and talk to us,,,they have numerous applications [taken by hand to the court ]date/stamped by court ignored, even lawyer saying his application ignored. In my website you have scan 10594 from Insp O Mahony confirming went over criminal offence malfeasance in public office, from statute of JCIO [judicial conduct investigation office ]they confirm via statute as criminal offence can not investigate any complaints, as criminal allegations as JCIO state should be investigated by the police, which they refuse to do. So becomes a IPCC [independant police commision complaint] .Where police admit we did not follow IPCC regulations in your IPCC case and sent reply to your appeal,WHERE ONE NOT MADE,,,police,,,you have no evidence of malfeasance in public office ignoring applications for years,,,. HOWEVER JUDICIARY STATE SHOULD HAVE GONE TO JCIO AND VEXATIOUS TO MAKE ALLEGATIONS AGAINST POLICE,,,,,,THEY ADMIT ALLEGATIONS IN JUDICIAL REVIEW. We have further the initial judgement of HHJCotter, where HHJBigger at Admin court Cardiff states the facts of case in HHJCotters judgement, later at court of appeal Legatt LJ states facts of case in HHJCotters judgement. However from several lawyers and barristers who saw my website,,,,cited the fairtale,,,Hans Christane Andersan THE KINGS NEW CLOTHES to Sharing v Preston cc [2012] EWHC 515



Can I refer to Sharing v Preston cc [2012] EWHC 515 where clearly Legatt had judged case before looking at facts, ,,,,mind already made up,,,,,as he stated,,,,,facts of case in HHJCotters judgement,,,but this is story HHJCotter made up to corrupt and frustrate the judicial process , ITS WRONG ON FACTS eg why I went to defendants,day 1 as CPS FEDJCAP document ect FEDJCAB its in pre action protocol for judicial review document,,,,DID NOT GO TO DEFENDANTS OVER JUDGEMENTS OF HHJDENYER. From Sharing,, The ‘fair minded and independent bystander’ test used here should clearly be in the mind of any representatives who feel that they have been effectively rejected without serious hearing on appeal – IN EMAIL 13.7.2018 THE COURT OF APPEAL HAS THE FEDJCAP DOCUMENT,,,IT KNOWS I DID NOT GO TO DEFENDANTS OVER JUDGEMENTS OF HHJDENYER

WE HAVE FURTHER COURT STATING HHJCOTTER DID NOT READ APPLICATION OF THE 6.12.2017 MADE UNDER Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS ,,,,,as female judge stated serious legal issue now,,,,read wrong papers,,,so ask for refund of fee. Legatt judgement in tatters,,,,facts of case in Cotters judgement,,,but Cotter did not read application,,,statute,,,complain to court,,,,take to Resolver,,,then refer to Lopresti,,,,,who will collate evidence to refer to ombudsman,,,where LOPRESTI CONFIRMS HE WILL IGNORE MY CORRESPONDENCE,,LOPRESTI YOUR CORRUPT AND BENT IN POCKET OF POLICE AND COURTS YOU KNOW MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE.WILL NOT COLLATE EVIDENCE FOR OMBUDSMAN,,,, ASK LOPRESTI FOR STATE TO PROVIDE LEGAL AID HOWEVER 32 EMAILS IN LAST 2 YEARS ALL IGNORED



SYNOPSIS FOR MEDIA TO SEE WHAT HAS BEEN GOING ON



SYNOPSIS,,,CORRUPTION BETWEEN POLICE AND COURTS AND TORY MP REPEAT OF PROFUMA CASE IN CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER ,,note court is civil court not criminal

PLEASE SEE MY WEBSITE WWW.CORRUPTIONINBRISTOLCOUNTYCOURT.COM WHERE YOU HAVE AT START RECENT LATEST IGNORED EMAIL TO LOPRESTI IN LETTER YOU HAVE SCAN EVIDENCE 1 THE POLICE ISSUE AND SCAN EVIDENCE 4 AND 6 THE COURT ISSUE BOTH IGNORED REQUEST FOR DATA REASON FOR CRIMINAL ACTIONS FORCED INTO,,,,COURT ISSUES OVER 20YEARS

Court case at Bristol county court, comes before Administration court Cardiff in judicial review where Bristol court awarded 500.00 costs. Take to court of appeal where comes before Lord Goldring, where asks if i can argue corruption at the court, TRYING TO HELP,,where he states via Strickson v Preston cc [2007] EWCA 1132 although as today ,,,,,the court getting judgement very badly wrong ...its not a reason to appeal a High court judgement in judicial review, will return to later asked for return of file, if i paid postal cost,,,inside WHEN papers returned was Lord Goldrings note,,,,,,,,,,,circumstances when a High Court judge can judicially review a County Court judge's decision were exceptional and limited to instances where the judicial process itself had been frustrated or corrupted…..can see why asked if i could argue corruption.

Lord Goldring said he was sorry although the courts getting judgements very badly wrong he could do nothing, however he could look at cost awarded against you, and this 500.00 would be quashed

NEVER FORGIVEN BY BRISTOL COUNTY COURT AND ADMIN COURT CARDIFF FOR JUDGEMENT REASON TODAY ISSUES



Court case ,,,,contract with government contractor reason Lopresti does not want to get involved,,,between Ms Suggett and myself,,,have the court transcript of hearing…LAWYER,,.transcript..my client does not know Ms Suggett or where these emails [the contract ]come from….as judge who saw my website stated,,,did judge believe you forged evidence,,,judge who heard case in note stated later,,,on reflection something very odd with this case,,as asked for his notes,,,,[from barrister told heard by DDJGisby told has a law firm in Bristol hoping to become a full time judge] accuse LATER defence lawyer of perjury with letter reply….Ms Suggett was person who dealt with your application too late for you to do anything about it now,,,report perjury to police told by Sgt Bell as corruption between police and the courts,,,as in Profuma affair ,,,,we will not take on the courts ,anyway they have informed MP they will not take cost awarded to them, no need for us to act,,,so i can rob a bank repay money and therefore police will take no action,,,even many years later money taken every month and then repaid SAME DAY from my bank account,,,,still done 2021.

Try to obtain evidence from the court,to do appeal applications ,,The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,,,,,,,,,where court Mr Fowler states however your correspondence will not be read not answered just filed utter breach of Article 6 as Fowler corrupts and frustrates judicial process...utter breach of Article 6

Courts ignoring correspondence contact Lopresti MP he ignores correspondence ,then obtain letter will write again to the court never obtained reply from Lopresti

Courts for years ignoring applications and correspondence ,issue website... www.corruptioninbristolcountycourt.com Have my website NOW where blackmailed ,,,,told by HHJDenyer ...remove website or consequences. I WILL NOT BE BLACKMAILED Have claim v Compuwave where they asked to settle ,settlement sent to the court, ask for removal from court hearing list...[please see my website at start recent email to Lopresti under scan evidence 4 where you have email to the court plus court receipt] record conversation with court, no need to attend hearing as case settled ,told on recording HHJDenyer had removed from hearing list, matter settled,no need to attend. Then see what CONSEQUENCES means as this corrupt and bent judge Denyer issues restraining, order ,,,,collusion with judge who now hears case, order as i now appealed., of course no party turned up for hearing.,appealed as case dismissed,we had settled matter.,sent court copy of tape ,,recorded delivery told not to turn up for hearing. [sole issue over computer program defendants admit error they had now supplied revised computer program

case settled] Quotes in restaining order, further case NBT [North Bristol NHS Trust] as i again appealed,,,]CAN SEE WHAT CONSEQUENCES MEAN] initial case for medical records/put statement in medical records/travel expenses. Case struck out in papers, no hearing ,,where i appealed,,,,NBT THEN ASKED TO SETTLE JUST BEFORE HEARING DATE SUPPLIED MEDICAL RECORDS PAID TRAVEL EXPENSES AND PUT STATEMENT IN MEDICAL RECORDS EVERY RIGHT TO APPEAL.MONTHS BEFORE WOULD NEVER HAVE OBTAINED IF NOT MADE APPEAL.AS STRUCK OUT . IN RECENT EMAIL TO LOPRESTI HE IS AWARE THAT ABOVE PARTIES COVERED IN EMAIL IF FACTS NOT CORRECT ABOVE TO CONTACT HIM ,,,COPY TO ME. PERHAPS CORRUPT LOPRESTI CAN INFORM ME AND MEDIA IF HE HAD ANY REPLIES HE REFUSES TO ANSWER MY CORRESPONDENCE AS BENT COLLUSION BETWEEN LOPRESTI COURT POLICE. MEDIA CAN ASK ABOVE IF FACTS CORRECT at hearing with NBT their lawyer asks that judgement reads i acted unreasonably,,,,rejected by DJWatson, applications by myself and lawyer for transcript of hearing ignored by corrupt court,,,DJWatson however stated i had not acted unreasonably ,,,,,therefore ,Denyer never any reason to issue restaining order, i would never of obtained medical records, put statement in medical records, get travel expences if i did not appeal,,,,again bent and corrupt HHJDenyer utter breach of Article 6 [see later NBT again drag me through court REFUSE to release further medical records years later]

Brumarescu v Rumania ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,fundamental aspect of rule of law is the principle of legal certainty which requires that when the courts have finally determined an issue then ruling should not be called into question…………Tregubello v Ukrain ,,,,,,,,,,calling into question in this manner whether it be by a judge or exective NBT asked that judgement reads i acted unreasonably ,,,rejected by DJWatson stated i had not acted unreasonably ,,,,Denyer now saying DJWatson wrong,,,media ask NBT just before hearing did you ask to settle ????? supply outstanding medical records and put statement in medical records,,,did you ask judgement states i acted unreasonably rejected by judge.Did you then ask Denyer to make order, ....ask court to look at files rejected utter breach of Article 6…..Ruiz –Materis v Spain,,,,,,,,,,,,,,plaintiff to have knowledge and comment on all evidence adducted or observations filed,,,,,,

APEH et al v Hungary ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,it is inadmissible for one party to make submissions to a court without knowledge of the other and on which the later has no opportunity to comment,,

DID NBT ASK DENYER TO MAKE ORDER

Another case comes before the courts, applications date/stamped by the courts, however missing at hearing, it appears someone at court or judges removing papers, as DJWatson stated,,,,,,something very very odd here,,,,,a case i won not issue today,,,earlier further documents date/stamped by the court missing from another case file

Picket at court as applications to them and correspondence as above ignored,OVER MANY YEARS. [20 years ] Barrister who i gave scan picket to, please see my website for document, told me to report malfeasance in public office, ignoring applications for years to police, seen by Sgt Price where she asks for CPS document on malfeasance in public office and insert my complaint,

CPS in black DIRECT PASTE from their document , my comments were in red this is direct paste to Sgt Price ,eg why I went to police,,, this is subsection of FEDJCAB complete, court document defined just FEDJCAB as subsection of full document,,,,eg,,,,, why I went to police

SCOPE OF OFFENCE,,,Misconduct in public office is an offence at common law ,,,,,,,office confined to those that are public office holders and is commited when the office holder acts or fails to act in a way that constitutes a breach of the duties of that office. ,,,,,,,he is judge HHJDenyer that deals with appeals, there is no doubt he failed to act when appeals/appication are sent to him to pervert the course of justice.[CAN I ADD SEE APPENDIX 2,,,,,used today same document title Appendix 2 for reference] DEFINITION OF OFFENCE wilfully neglects to perform his duty and/or wilfully misconduct himself ,,,,,,,,,he failed to perform his duty by ignoring my applications PUBLIC OFFICER ,,,,judges defined as officer,,,,,,,

Please see Copwatch above was brushed off by Sgt Price,,,,told to complain to JCIO, where told of statute malfeasance in public office a criminal offence,,,,SHE KNOWS THIS HER OWN OFFICERS CONVICTED AND JAILED IN IBTAHIMI CASE via statute JCIO could not investigate ,,,,,,PCBird states i talked to court was told we could not investigate.. judges immune [in CPS document have long list of people convicted ,,,includes judges,,,]and to complain to JCIO. The police as in Sgt Bell case try to call black is white,,,,,again court say,have letter from the court,,,,,,,,,,,,,we ignored your applications malfeasance in public office,,,come and talk to us,,,however police state you have no evidence,,,,PCBird asked third party who confirmed, asked for years who was this person. Becomes IPCC investigation please see below where police admit we did not follow IPCC regulations and sent reply to your later appeal when no appeal lodged.IPCC advise a judicial review.

THE FEDJCAB IN PREACTION PROTOCOL DOCUMENT FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW SERVED ON COURT AND POLICE.

FROM MY WEBSITE THE PREACTION PROTOCOL DOCUMENT VIA STATUTE HAVE TO BE SERVED VIA FURTHER ANNEX A STATUTE PARAGRAPHS PLEASE SEE SCAN ANNEX A IN MY WEBSITE,,,,,,,,,,,

paragraph 7/ THE ISSUE [ANNEX A STATUTE PARAGRAPHS]

BCC [Bristol county court ] for years ignoring applications, criminal offence malfeasance in public office, .resulting in one incident of miscarriage of justice. Complaint to defendants [POLICE] who refuse to investigate.



8/ THE DETAILS OF ACTION THAT DEFENDANTS ARE EXPECTED TO TAKE

We expect criminal offence to be investigated, the Home Office state all crimes should be investigated

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,



ASKED POLICE WAS THIS AS STATED IN PRE ACTION PROTOCOL DOCUMENT WHERE DEFENDANTS IGNORE ,,,,,,,IN 2018 POLICE DEMAND MONEY TO ANSWER QUESTION. THE QUESTION ASKED UNDER ,,,, The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,,,,,,,,,

Can i please refer to my website scan 10594 letter from Insp O Mahoney,,,,malfeasance in public office ignoring applications and correspondence for years,,,however from my letter,,,,did not know if Denyer doing criminal act or court staff not sending documents to him.As blackmail restraining order in place have to ask HHJCotter to issue the judicial review.









HHJCotter asks for fee to hear this case, visit court 5.12.2017 ,told by Mr Blair ,,your not looking at files of us ignoring your applications ,make application to HHJCotter told who will also ignore,clear tactics between them to pervert the course of justice, breach of Article 6 The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,,,







THE PRESENT COURT ISSUE

SGT PRICE ALSO SENT THE LETTER SCAN 13.4.2017 DOCUMENT PLEASE SEE MY WEBSITE FOR DOCUMENT ,,THESE PLUS FEDJCAB IN LATER STATUTE DOCUMENT PRE ACTION PROTOCOL DOCUMENT FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW HOWEVER SGT PRICE STATES ,,,DO NOT REMEMBER SEEING THEM. IS THIS NOT IDENTICAL IN CORRUPTION BETWEEN POLICE AND JUDICIARY IN PROFUMA CASE WHERE MANDY RICE DAVIES STATED IN COURT ,,,,HE WOULD SAY THAT WOUL*D HE [TODAY SHE PRICE WOULD SAY THAT] WE HAVE STATUTE CAN NOT MAKE APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW UNLESS FIRST TRIED TO SETTLE, VIA PRE ACTION PROTOCOL FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW DOCUMENT ,,,ASK POLICE FOR YEARS WAS FEDJCAB IN PRE ACTION PROTOCOL FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW SERVED ON POLICE AND COURTS VIA EMAIL 17.10.2017,,,,SGT PRICE STATES UNAWARE OF EVIDENCE ???????PERHAPS POLICE CAN SUPPLY EVIDENCE SUPPLIED TAKE ONE EXAMPLE SEE PROPERTY RECEIPT 259327 ,,,,RECEIPT STATES LETTER FOR PS SUE PRICE TEAM 3 ,,,THIS DOCUMENT TODAY SERVED ON POLICE WHERE ASK CAN I PLEASE HAVE ALL DOCUMENTS SERVED ON SGT PRICE HOWEVER POLICE CONFIRM THEY WILL IGNORE ALL CORRESPONDENCE THIS DOCUMENT SENT TO POLICE MS JENNISON WHERE ASK FOR COPIES OF ALL DOCUMENTS SERVED ON SGT PRICE IN 7 DAYS,,,FURTHER THIS DOCUMENT SENT TO PCC MOUNTSTEVENS,,,CAN SHE ENSURE IN 7 DAYS ALL CORRESPONDENCE SERVED ON PRICE IS SUPPLIED TO ME ,,,WE KNOW SHE WILL IGNORE FURTHER ASK MOUNTSTEVENS TO FORWARD THIS DOCUMENT TO CHIEF CONSTABLE LATER WHEN IN magistrates COURT CAN REFER TO POLICE IGNORING CORRESPONDENCE WHY NOW IN COURT BEFORE MAGISTRATE BEFORE SENT TO PRISON

Accuse initally court of malfeasance in public office where in court reply admit ,,,,,we ignored appliations and correspondence,,,,,,come and talk to us. Is this not as with Sgt Bell police corruption with judiciary as in Profuma case ,their reply you have no evidence of offence where court admit we ignored. Police judgement comes under Wednesbury unreasonableness. Eg you have no evidence,,,consider earlier Sgt Bell stance you have no evidence of perjury,,,he has transcript what was said in court and lawyer admitting offence. We have issues with the police Mirojuhys v Latvia …………………fairness of proceedings always assessed by examining them in entirety so that an isolated incident may not be sufficient to conclude proceedings as a whole unfair…. ,,,,,,consider these 2 cases no isolated incident. On the 22.7.2017 ask police 11 questions to do appeal ,,,,YOU HAVE NO EVIDENCE,,, application,,,under The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,,,,,,,,,to be able to make appeal, saying with no reply would do appeal on the 28.7.2017, where police send letter dated 24.7.2017 saying reply to your appeal, i have made no appeal waiting for reply to 22.7.2017 email. No dispute of facts please see from my website scan 10475 scan 10494 where police state ,,,,, eg,,You then emailed in reply 22.7.2017 and accused,,,,,,, of sweeping under the carpet…..You also said will assume with no email reply by 9.00 am 28.7.2017 there would be no reply and can do appeal to you. +

Can i address IPCC investigation and regulations Regulations IPCC [independent police complaint commission] in a police investigation.,,,,sent to me ALSO ON INTERNET....[in present 2021 NEW issue have email from police,,,CI Debarah Palmer-Lawrence will contact to discuss your complaint ,,,,never any contact in historic complaints breach of IPCC regulations]

Contact to make sure have all details

Ask what you want to happen

Inform you what is likely to happen

Talk to you about way they will deal with your complaint

Let you know the outcome when they have finished , do in person or on phone ,BUT should also write to you

PLEASE SEE SCAN 10594 IN MY WEBSITE WHERE INSP O MAHONY ADMIT WE NEVER TALKED TO YOU ,,,SO IS IT NOT TRUE WE IGNORED IPCC REGULATIONS AND SENT REPLY TO YOUR APPEAL WHERE ONE NOT MADE,,SO I AM DELUSINARY MENTALLY ILL ???????YOU HAD NO EVIDENCE OF MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE FOR YEARS COURT IGNORING APPLICATIONS AND CORRESPONDENCE WHERE HAVE COURT SAYING WE IGNORED YOUR APPLICATIONS COME AND TALK TO US,,,SENT REPLY TO THIS PROPOSED APPEAL WHERE ONE NOT MADE,,LODGED,,,JUDICIAL REVIEW APPLICATION ,,,DIRECT PASTE



The Queen on the application of PHILIP JONES

Versus ,,,,CHIEF CONSTABLE AVON AND SOMERSET POLICE

SYNOPSIS ,,,SOLE ISSUE WHAT WE ARE ASKING CAN DEFENDANTS IGNORE STATUTORY IPCC REGULATIONS ON INVESTIGATION [grounds 1 in judicial review application page 4] AND WHEN AGAIN IN STATUTORY REGULATIONS I CAN APPPEAL,[grounds 2 in judicial application page 4/5] ,,,,SEND REPLY TO AN APPEAL I HAVE NOT LODGED. AS ONE LAWYER STATED WHERE ARE WE CHINA/RUSSIA.[IPCC state police inform us you lodged an appeal, only route a judicial review you will see in police letter they state you emailed us on the 22.7.2017 asking questions to do appeal,you stated WITH NO REPLY BY 28.7.2017 YOU WOULD ASSUME QUESTIONS WOULD NOT BE ANSWERED AND WOULD DO APPEAL ON/AFTER 28.7.2017. IN REPLY TO THAT EMAIL ,,,,24.7.2017 DEFENDANTS ALLEDGE THAT EMAIL 22.7.2017 WAS THE APPEAL]WHERE ARE WE CHINA/RUSSIA[end of quote judicial review]

THE DETAIL IN MY WEBSITE AT START EG EMAIL TO LOPRESTI ,,,FOR POLICE ISSUE SCAN EVIDENCE 1 AND COURT SCAN EVIDENCE 4.AND 6

Police have letter from court ADMITTING OFFENCE ,,,,[AS SGT BELL HAD ,,,]we ignored your applications come and talk to us..please see below also aware again please see above that via statute JCIO [JUDICIAL CONDUCT INVESTIGATION OFFICE] could not investigate AS MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE A CRIMINAL OFFENCE …..ONLY SHORT TIME BEFORE IN EBRAHIMI CASE IN BRISTOL THEIR OFFICERS JAILED UNDER IDENTICAL OFFENCE EG IGNORING CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS . HOWEVER POLICE JUDGEMENT YOU HAVE NO EVIDENCE OF MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE COMES UNDER WEDNESBURY UNREASONABLENESS,,,IS THIS NOT SAME CORRUPTION AS WITH SGT BELL ABOVE ,,,,,YOU HAVE NO EVIDENCE BOTH PARTIES ADMIT OFFENCE POLICE STATE FURTHER JUDGES IMMUNE HOWEVER IN CPS DOCUMENT AWARE JUDGES CONVICTED

Becomes IPCC investigation, where police admit we did not follow IPCC regulations, and admit we sent reply to your appeal,,,,you have no evidence of malfeasance in public office ,,,,,where you had made no appeal, PLEASE SEE MY WEBSITE

You have evidence why restraining order made, by bent HHJDenyer i can not get replies from bent court/police/MP can i please ask media to ask Compuwave /NBT if facts correct. As restraining order in place have to ask court permission to issue the judicial review. Ask police and court for evidence,,,,,The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,,,,,,,,,,,, In litagation eg again later at Admin court /court of appeal in live proceedings asked under,,,PART 32 EVIDENCE

Notice to admit facts

32.18

(1) A party may serve notice on another party requiring him to admit the facts, or the part of the case of the serving party, specified in the notice.,,,,,,,,,,,ALL CORRESPONDENCE IGNORED AS THEY CORRUPT AND FRUSTRATE THE JUDICIAL PROCESS.









ASKED POLICE WAS THIS AS STATED IN PRE ACTION PROTOCOL DOCUMENT WHERE DEFENDANTS IGNORE ,,,,,,,IN 2018 POLICE DEMAND MONEY TO ANSWER QUESTION. THE QUESTION ASKED UNDER ,,,, The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,,,,,,,,,



HHJCotter asks for fee to hear this case, visit court 5.12.2017 ,told by Mr Blair ,,your not looking at files of us ignoring your applications ,make application to HHJCotter told who will also ignore,clear tactics between them to pervert the course of justice, breach of Article 6 The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,,,,,,,,,????????????????????

As evidence withheld ask 5.12.2017 for court N244 form please see my website for example of form,,,write on it application not to be sent to HHJCotter until new N244 plus application sent next day, pay court fee on this understanding, made under

Goc vTurkey,,,Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS ,

No need to repeat here, can i refer to detail evidence in letter to Lopresti,,,in start of my website ,,scan evidence 1,4 and 6,,,HHJCotter aware there is new N244 form,,what i want court to do, aware application against police malfeasance in public office, aware also application to remove blackmail of restraining order, aware of application made 6.12.2017 ,aware why i went to police day 1. Already 2 applications to remove restraining blackmail order ignored. Can i digress start of 2019 use library computers to do work, young woman crying working on computer, where as medic try to help, SHE,,,,severe depression . She has bus pass much later suggested going to court to obtain evidence , as third party ,would buy her a coffee afterwards. Not required her evidence at court have PSU unit [now known support through court] where manager said he would help.Discuss with court Mr Hunt where court inform PSU manager he would reply to question in 10 days, lied to manager, as court frustrate the judicial process ,where today court manager Ms Pawsey knowing miscarriage of justice now confirms courts refuses to answer questions,Hunt told PSU he would answer,,,asked Lopresti to ask for reply,,,he knows miscarriage of justice, however ignores correspondence collusion between Tory MP/police /courts. What was question...

Series of emails confirming agreement,,,,,Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS for example 7.12.2017 email stated

In application yesterday requested that page one of N244 lodged previously was removed and replaced with document sent to you yesterday. Can you please confirm done. COURT IGNORED emails,,

ASKED HUNT AND PAWSEY ARE THESE EMAILS IN FILE MADE UNDER ADORISIO


5.12.2017 timed 16.17 court receipt 16.17

6.12.2017 timed 15.33 15.35 15.45 court receipt same time THE APPLICATION UNDER ADORISIO

7.12.2017 timed 9.58 court receipt 9.59 PLEASE SEE ABOVE

21.12.2017 timed 11.00 court receipt 11.00. AWARE APPLICATION TO ALSO REMOVE BLACKMAIL RESTRAINING ORDER ALSO IN SKELETAL ARGUMENT AWARE WHY I WENT TO POLICE AS BARRISTERS ADVICE DAY 1 Nn.You are aware [efiling] of much detail eg emails in December 2017 ,,,,,,,,,,,,,5, 2 on 6 and one on the 7 of December.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,this was in email of the 21.12.2017 so Cotter aware of application under ADORISIO 6.12.2017



i29.12.2017 timed 4.22 know court had as HHJCotter admits he read as made under Adorisio,,,,,,quote from email aware also of 6.12.2017 application as asked if obtainednawwaseem,aeFor example recorded conversation at court with Mr Blair where i wrote on N244 form amendment would be sent to application, not to sent to HHJCotter until amendment sent, -UNQUOTEa,,,

,,,,,itCs a criminal offence THIS B

,,,,,,,,,,,,,ISSUE NO EVIDENCE OF MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE. For example police Galloway accepts in his letter ,,,, court order to make application ,,,,,, applications made to the court that were ignored, emailed on regular basis for reply to applications which court ignored, back to 2013, , I give evidence for example lawyers /MP also tried to get a reply to applications, which were ignored. Recording with court staffWe then get HHJCotter judgement with retired District judge stating not judicial language however they are utter bastards,,,saying vexatious to make allegations against police, and should have made complaint to JCIO, [is this not as Profuma case collusion between police and court with Tory MP involved] however he states in judgement i went to police malfeasance in public office, its a criminal offence THIS BENT JUDGE AWARE VIA STATUTE AS CRIMINAL OFFENCE CAN NOT REFER TO JCIO ,POLICE ALSO AWARE FROM DAY 1 COULD NOT REFER TO JCIO. ,,COTTER HAS JCIO SAYING THEY CAN NOT INVESTIGATE. COTTER HAS PRE ACTION PROTOCOL DOCUMENT FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW DOCUMENT,,,MADE UNDER STATUTE ANNEX A PARAGRAPHS HOWEVER STATE ISSUE AS I WAS SOLELY UNHAPPY WITH JUDGEMENTS OF HHJDENYER ????

paragraph 7/ THE ISSUE [ANNEX A STATUTE PARAGRAPHS]

BCC [Bristol county court ] for years ignoring applications, criminal offence malfeasance in public office, .resulting in one incident of miscarriage of justice. Complaint to defendants [POLICE] who refuse to investigate.

HE HAS THE FEDJCAB DOCUMENT IN PREACTION PROTOCOL DOCUMENT,,,

SCOPE OF OFFENCE,,,Misconduct in public office is an offence at common law ,,,,,,,office confined to those that are public office holders and is commited when the office holder acts or fails to act in a way that constitutes a breach of the duties of that office. ,,,,,,,he is judge HHJDenyer that deals with appeals, there is no doubt he failed to act when appeals/application are sent to him to pervert the course of justice.,,,,nothing to do with judgements...



W here get contradictory evidence in visit to the court,,,,we did not get email application of 6.12.2012 ,,THEN ,we had it under Adorision,,,,,,,,,,,Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS told not sent to Cotter where ask for refund of court fee, where told later please see scanredgrave ,,,,only looked in fee section no record of EXTRA fee, no fee extra required under statute Adorisio ,,,,Again as several lawyers/barristers have stated,,,,if court believed in goodwill a fee was required, and consider… Kerojarvi v Finland ,,,,,,,court must exercise diligence for an appellant not represented by a lawyer,

WHY DID COURT NOT ASK FOR A FEE. Statute make complaint to court [for refund of court fee ],,,next step take to Resolver,,,,still not resolved ,via statute general public can not refer to ombudsman ,only MP can refer to ombudsman ,he/she would have to collate evidence to see if MP will refer to ombudsman so asked corrupt MP to write to court, he would need facts before referring case to ombudsman,,,,THIS CORRUPT AND BENT MP AWARE VIA STATUTE ONLY HE CAN REFER TO OMDUDSMAN IN POCKET OF POLICE,/COURTS IGNORES MY CORRESPONDENCE AS HE CONFIRMS ,,, THEREFORE CAN NOT REFER TO OMBUDMAN ,,,did you get application 6.12.2017,,,was it sent to Cotter ...did Cotter read application,,,ect ect...how can he refer HE does not know facts,,,,,and refuses to obtain ….important document asked Lopresti to ask for defaced N244 form,,,,and N244 form sent to Lopresti,,,,was it one made 6.12.2017 or ONE COTTER MADE AND FORGED MY SIGNATURE,,,,IN MY N244 IS AGAIN APPLICATION TO REMOVE BLACKMAIL RESTRAINING ORDER,,,,,ISSUE NOT RAISED IN JUDGEMENT,,,,.collusion of corrupt and bent Lopresti with court and police.

1/ Restaining order ended.2018 Need further medical records at LATER date when previous summons issued. Again NBT refuse to supply where summons issued, struck out in papers where again appeal, given court hearing date. Then have correspondence not from Cotter but his CLERK ,,,told we had discussion with NBT where agreed case removed from hearing date you will be given new date for hearing later. Remember struck out in papers never served on NBT ,no defence therefore what did Cotter via his clerk organise with NBT. So application under

Ruiz –Materis v Spain,,,,,,,,,,,,,,plaintiff to have knowledge and comment on all evidence adducted or observations filed,,,,,,

APEH et al v Hungary ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,it is inadmissible for one party to make submissions to a court without knowledge of the other and on which the later has no opportunity to comment,,

on the 22.2.2018 where Cotter ignores application to look at files WHAT WAS AGREED WITH NBT,,,,,APPLICATION IGNORED AS THIS COURT HAS DONE FOR YEARS. Comes before HHJRalton, who states ….reason struck out as application utterly incomprehensible,,,, in my website ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, QUOTE FROM POC ,,,,,APPLICATION FOR MEDICAL RECORDS OF [DATE] AND TO PUT STATEMENT IN MEDICAL RECORDS,,, INCOMPREHENSIBLE ??????????????????..Agreed at hearing NBT would supply medical records and put statement in medical records as the POC [particular of claim].Never obtained medical records taken on day, only their understanding summmary of facts. Ask as NHS statute to look at files, recorded, where from recording NBT admit in visit my statement not in file, further the actual records as the POC removed from file. Contact court where talk to PSU ,,,they talk to court must admit court helpful,,,suggested letter appliation to HHJRalton saying his order ignored, where Ralton stated to court,,,i have no comment to make, knowing order ignored.

2/ Then get medical records of third party not mine, NBT utter shambles, ask for sae to return ignored,,,,,inform Lopresti i have third party medical records, ask for help, where corrspondence ignored. NBT/LOPRESTI UTTER BREACH OF DATA PROTECTION STATUTE.STILL HAVE HIS PERSONAL MEDICAL RECORDS WHAT DO I DO

3/ Blackmail restraining order out of time so could make application for judicial review,NO NEED TO ASK PERMISSION. . Need evidence so application to HHJCotter to look at files, made under The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,,,,,,,,,???????????????????? ignored. Make complain to Lopresti ,for help, covered Cotter in email, where Cotter aware of above replies 2 months later please see scan Cotterlate in my website. Cotter as you can see corrupts and frustrates the judicial process asks me to ask court staff,,,knowing said no,,,they confirm again no,,,,,clearly court is ,,,DENYING ,,, ,,,,opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,,,,,,,,,????????????????????.In proceedings asked Admin court to make order,,,,to obtain evidence, the court and police in proceedings asked questions to admit facts under ,

Notice to admit facts

32.18

(1) A party may serve notice on another party requiring him to admit the facts, or the part of the case of the serving party, specified in the notice.,,,,,,,,,,,ALL CORRESPONDENCE IGNORED AS THEY CORRUPT AND FRUSTRATE THE JUDICIAL PROCESS.

As previous problems with also Admin court Cardiff ask for judicial review to be heard in Birmingham, under APPLICATION PRACTICE DIRECTIVES 54D 5.2

Pro Bono Unit let me down as had to do application on my own, therefore later evidence under ,,,,,,,,Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS

For example Birmingham Admin court SENT recording with Sgt Price, has the FEDJCAB document, has scan 14.4.2017, has pre action protocol for judicial review document, has correspondence from JCIO ect,,,,,have asked Birmingham court did you get correspondence, have Royal Mail proof of posting slip.asked Cardiff court did Birmingham send to you, where in utter breach of Article 6 both courts ignore my emails.

The initial application in judicial review,,,,QUOTE

The issue with police ,,,,,,perjury issue [Eaga case] and court staff /judges ignoring applications, and correspondence, ignored,,,, McGinley v UK,,,,,,breach withholding documents which would have assisted with case...Ruiz-Mateus v Spain ,,,,,to have knowledge of and comment on all evidence adducted or observations filed... resulting in miscarriage of justice, perverting course of justice, In 2YJ03757 we know application made for oral hearing , from recording with Mr Blair at Bristol court office Mr Till sent to the Administration court Cardiff, he has court order to send to HHJDenyer did he ignore order, malfeasance in public office, or did he send to HHJDenyer who ignored, did Administration court obtain, we suggested to police could they get local police to obtain file, ,,,,we know lawyer could not get a oral hearing, we asked police,,,,,have you talked to lawyer, ,,,,have you talked to Pro Bono Unit, ,,,,,,please see details in text. .Are these chronic events, Mirojuhys v Latvia …………………fairness of proceedings always assessed by examining them in entirety [malfeasance in public office] that an isolated incident may not be sufficient to conclude proceedings as a whole unfair…. ,,,,,,consider even 2018 issues, where even today applications ignored. UNQUOTE

Very clear what issue is ,,,,malfeasance in public office, ,,,,,even today applications ignored,,,



GET JUDGEMENT FROM HHJBIGGER IDENTICAL AS COTTER WENT SOLELY AS DISSATISFIED WITH JUDGEMENTS OF DENYER,,,,,BIGGER AWARE FROM ABOVE ..The issue with police ,,,,,,perjury issue [Eaga case] and court staff /judges ignoring applications, and correspondence, ignored,,,, DID HE READ APPLICATION. FROM APPLICATION STATE STILL GOING ON IN 2018,,,,,,,AS FEMALE JUDGE STATED COTTER/BIGGER NEVER GOING TO GRANT THIS APPLICATION ,,,TURKEYS VOTING FOR XMAS,,,,INVITING POLICE INTO THE COURT MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE IGNORING APPLICATIONS. SENIOR BARRISTER ANDREW MARSDEN STATED DENYER RETIRED IN 2017 REASON COTTER HEARD APPLICATION 6.12.2017 SO ISSUE IN JUDICIAL REVIEW CAN NOT BE ,ISSUE WITH DENYER,,,RETIRED IN 2017 ,,,Mirojuhys v Latvia …………………fairness of proceedings always assessed by examining them in entirety [malfeasance in public office] that an isolated incident may not be sufficient to conclude proceedings as a whole unfair…. ,,,,,,consider even 2018 issues, where even today applications ignored.

Something odd here Denyer in same chambers as Andrew Marsden,,,,,one week after seeing me observed Andrew moved to another chambers.

4/ So Bigger confirms vexatious to make allegations against police ,and i should have complained to JCIO , from above you have allegations in judicial review where in own words police admit allegations , further did not go to police as unhappy over many years with judgements of Denyer,,,,malfeasance in public office criminal offence from JCIO statute could not make claim to JCIO.



5/For media need to explain all money claims must go through Salford county court. New defendants ,new case,where Salford court refuse to issue proceedings as phantom restraining order in force. At time no order in place ,where told judiciary HHJ Bigger ????at Ad ministration court told court not to issue ANY more proceedings, by me , told to get letter from judiciary fromAdmin court Cardiff if facts not correct, where they ignore all emails, take up issue with PSU Bristol court,,,,they talk to court staff,,,no OFFICIAL LEGAL ORDER EVER MADE where court NOW pays compensation.Further state today we will issue your claim,,,informed defendants claim on way, apology for delay,,,they then pay claim, inform court settled to remove from file. Consider the blackmail restraining order it appears the judiciary determined to keep me out of the courts. Offered 50.00 compensation, where inform court money not issue, how did court get this, looks like corruption at the judiciary. Where told by manager my staff offering 50.00 utterly unacceptable,,,i have paid 150.00 compensation to you.

Goodafternoon REF BELOW

Barclays

P D JONES

30884960 O2

20 1334

P JONES

Thank you for your email of 3 March accepting our offer of £150.

In order for us to make the payment of £150 by bank transfer, please email me at customerinvestigations@justice.gov.uk including your:

• bank name

• account name

• account number

• sort code.

We will then arrange payment for you. It can take up to 20 working days for the money to reach you from the date we hear from you.

You can also write if you prefer at: HM Courts & Tribunals Service Customer Investigations Team Post Point 5.13 5th Floor 102 Petty France London SW1H 9AJ

If you have any further questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Yours sincerely

LAST CONTACT 16.12.2020 YES A FEW WEEKS AGO THEY HAVE NO RECORD WHY PAID DO ADMIT CHEQUE ISSUED AND PAID ASKING ONE QUESTION WHAT WAS ON FILE THAT THE COURT WOULD NOT ISSUE MY PROCEEDINGS FROM ADMIN COURT CARDIFF. STILL WAITING FOR REPLY ,THIS DOCUMENT SENT TO THEM TODAY CAN WE HAVE RECORDS WHY COURT COULD NOT ISSUE MY CLAIM

6/ Now comes before court of appeal, restraining order,as i solely appealed HHJBiggers wrong judgement. So we have restraining blackmail order history,,,,made over a settled case ,please see in my website the settlement Compuwave wanted scan 10246 and in my website emails sent to court, and court receipt received,,,,where from recording told not to turn up for hearing as removed from hearing list ,,,settled case blackmailed by HHJDenyer,,,now phantom order the courts admit never made,,,now this one. HHJBiggers corruption failed ,,ordering Salford court to not issue my claims, courts already paid compensation for his corruption. Did he now ask court of appeal to issue a restraining order,,,,remember collusion between police and courts in Profuma affair. no one would take on my new case under legal aid NO ONE WOULD LOOK AT FACTS OF CASE new restaining order as i appealed HHJBiggers judgement.IN OWN WORDS POLICE ADMIT MY APPLICATION.No one would consider facts of case, over new restraining order. Police /courts had to be informed by court order if they object to removal of this restraining order ,they had no objection to removal of order. Court said issue with you and police we do not want to be involved.

C. Legal aid

1. Granting of legal aid

However, the Convention is intended to safeguard rights which are practical and effective, in particular the right of access to a court. Hence, Article 6 § 1 may sometimes compel the State to provide for the assistance of a lawyer when such assistance proves indispensable for an effective access to court (Airey v. Ireland, § 26).

ASK LOPRESTI WHERE THIS CORRUPT AND BENT MP REFUSES TO PASS PAPERS TO RT HON BUCKLAND,,,,IN POCKET OF POLICE AND COURTS

IT WAS NOT VEXATIOUS TO MAKE APPLICATIONS AGAINST POLICE PLEASE SEE ABOVE POLICE IN OWN WORDS ADMIT ALLEGATIONS CORRUPTION BETWEEN POLICE AND COURTS POLICE ADMIT APPLICATION





The Queen on the application of PHILIP JONES

Versus ,,,,CHIEF CONSTABLE AVON AND SOMERSET POLICE

SYNOPSIS ,,,SOLE ISSUE WHAT WE ARE ASKING CAN DEFENDANTS IGNORE STATUTORY IPCC REGULATIONS ON INVESTIGATION [grounds 1 in judicial review application page 4] AND WHEN AGAIN IN STATUTORY REGULATIONS I CAN APPPEAL,[grounds 2 in judicial application page 4/5] ,,,,SEND REPLY TO AN APPEAL I HAVE NOT LODGED. AS ONE LAWYER STATED WHERE ARE WE CHINA/RUSSIA.[IPCC state police inform us you lodged an appeal, only route a judicial review you will see in police letter they state you emailed us on the 22.7.2017 asking questions to do appeal,you stated WITH NO REPLY BY 28.7.2017 YOU WOULD ASSUME QUESTIONS WOULD NOT BE ANSWERED AND WOULD DO APPEAL ON/AFTER 28.7.2017. IN REPLY TO THAT EMAIL ,,,,24.7.2017 DEFENDANTS ALLEDGE THAT EMAIL 22.7.2017 WAS THE APPEAL]WHERE ARE WE CHINA/RUSSIA[end of quote judicial review]

From my website you can see application to obtain data, scan 10547 on court form, ignored by corrupt Legatt LJ as he corrupts and frustrates the judicial process.

WE GET SAME STANCE WITH COURT AND POLICE SEEN IN LITAGATION BEFORE COTTER AND BIGGER NOW LEGATT WITH AGAIN APPLICATIONS UNDER The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,,,,,

Notice to admit facts





32.18

(1) A party may serve notice on another party requiring him to admit the facts, or the part of the case of the serving party, specified in the notice.,,,,,,,,,,,ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO COURT OF APPEAL IGNORED AS COURT AND POLICE FRUSTRATE THE JUDICIAL PROCESS.

For example asking police question why did i come to you day 1, malfeasance in public office ignoring applications and correspondence over many years ,,,malfeasance in public office you are utterly aware of your officers a short time before jailed over same offence ignoring criminal allegations, via statute of JCIO can not investigate complaints if criminal offence allegations. SO YOU WERE WRONG ,,,,ISSUE NOW BEFORE THE COURT I SHOULD HAVE GONE TO JCIO,,,Asked under

Notice to admit facts

32.18

(1) A party may serve notice on another party requiring him to admit the facts, or the part of the case of the serving party, specified in the notice.,,,,,,,,,,,ALL CORRESPONDENCE IGNORED AS COURT AND POLICE FRUSTRATE THE JUDICIAL PROCESS.

To courts HHJCotter did not read application of 6.12.2017. eg in application back to court,,,,,read wrong papers.

Application to court of appeal had to do myself at end, Pro Bono Unit taken on case, they asked for numerous extensions of time, at end court of appeal stated final extension,,,heard nothing last day had to do on my own,,,,Via (Göç v. Turkey / Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS ,via emails Legatt has the FEDJCAB knows why i went to police, has letter of JCIO knows i could not complain to them, has letters from police admitting my application eg in the IPCC investigation we did not follow IPCC regulations and sent reply to your appeal,,,,you have no evidence of malfeasance in public office ignoring applications correspondence for years where police /Legatt have court letter we ignored your applications come and talk to us,,,they have email from Fowler,,,,,,your correspondence under The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,,,,,will not be read not answered just filed. Legatt has correspondence from LAWYER application ignored made by them

Application to court of appeal, ,,,,Application to vary (amend/change) a judgment (or order), suspend enforcement or suspend a warrant of possession or stay at High Court £50.

Eg to vary, amend order to remove restaining order where Master [level of judge ] demands 528.00 to remove. Where ask corrupt and bent Lopresti to send papers to Rt Hon Buckland for State to provide Legal aid He has all evidence that claim must be succesful,,,police in own words admit we did not follow IPCC regulations and sent reply to your appeal, where no appeal made, need one more bit of information why did i come to police day 1,,,and court therefore wrong could not refer to JCIO. For court to confirm that application 6.12.2017 was not read by Cotter. Lopresti has evidence of miscarriage of justice however however refuses to refer to Justice minister. From above historic application to court of appeal to return application,,,,before done after paying postage/packing charges, now computer crash ,,,part of application missing email court for return of application after hearing,,,,however court bins application

7/ So police over many years know miscarriage of justice,,,,chief constable,,,PCC Mountstevens know this however ignore my correspondence,,,eg from above application to admit facts and under The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,,,,,

8/ From my website get police letter scan police june which retired district judge stated was appaling, undated ,what are allegations ???

The requirements related to the burden of proof from the perspective of the principle of the presumption of innocence provide inter alia, that it is for the prosecution to inform the accused of the case that will be made against him or her, so that he or she may prepare and present his or her defence accordingly, and to adduce evidence sufficient to convict him or her (Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo v. Spain, § 77; Janosevic v. Sweden, § 97).



Article 6 § 3 of the Convention “3. Everyone charged with a criminal offence has the following minimum rights: (a) to be informed promptly, in a language which he understands and in detail, of the nature and cause of the accusation against him; (b) to have adequate time and facilities for the preparation of his defence; (c) to defend himself in person or through legal assistance of his own choosing or, if he has not sufficient means to pay for legal assistance, to be given it free when the interests of justice so require; (d) to examine or have examined witnesses against him and to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him;

Complaint 1.6.2020 to police what are allegations ,please see in my website scanevidence 6 for details in email to Lopresti ,where complaint ignored by police as with over the years ,,,,,why did i come to you day 1.

9/ In application to court of appeal, cite history of restraining orders, the blackmail one, and the phantom one where judiciary at Admin court Carfiff inform Salford county court never to issue my proceedings, supply evidence of restraining order list at time, of course not on list. On list is unknown woman. It appears Google MAKES WEBSITE cites this woman and cites confirmed in my website, do not know woman, know nothing about her case. Then get series of violent threating emails, from her, contact police you know answer will take no action, then get correspondence from her, she has contacted police, told i am delusionary in allegations against police, and mentally ill, so complaint to police 17.10.2020 over these libel comments. The female QC barrister and judge asked for reply from police to be sent to her for consideration over libel allegations. You know next bit application complaint ignored ,contact Lopresti as complaints police ignoring where he is happy police can ignore complaints. WE STATE TO MEDIA POLICE CAN MAKE ALLEGATIONS UTTERLY WITHOUT MERIT MAKE COMPLAINT WHERE MP HAPPY POLICE CAN IGNORE COMPLAINT.Ask police for replies ,cover bent PCC Mountstevens into email, can we have reply to complaints 1.6.2020 and 17.10.2020 which police ignore. Chance to obtain evidence,so i am delusionary ,mentally ill,,,,in allegations against police, where what were allegations, which from above you admit,,,,in IPCC investigation, we did not follow IPCC regulations, and we sent reply to your appeal where we admit no appeal made, ,,,,had just one outstanding issue.....DELUSIONARY....why did i come to you day,1,,was it malfeasance in public office ignoring applications /correspondence for years,,now is it a criminal offence, and therefore you and court wrong to state should have taken to JCIO ,via statute as they told you they could not investigate complaint,,,email again to Ms Jennison LAST ONE 7.1.2021 asking for replies to complaints of the 1.6.2020 and 17.10.2020 and why did i come to you day 1.

10/ After Lopresti confirming refusal to help, no where else to go, only option media, offending every week ,,,,court hearing,,,until sent to prison. Already released under investigation,,,,need court case,,,now or reoffending until sent to prison. My websites speak for themselves if facts wrong why have police not sued for libel.Galloway your bent your utterly aware could not refer to JCIO,,,,YOU STATE MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE AS THEY TOLD YOU COULD NOT REFER TO THEM AND YOU SENT REPLY TO AN APPEAL WHERE ONE NOT LODGED,,,YOU SAID IF DOING APPEAL,,,NEED TO ENCLOSE OUR APPEAL FORM ,,,,NEVER SERVED.YOU THEN CORRUPT AND FRUSTRATE THE JUDICIAL PROCESS KNOWING MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE REFUSE TO CONFIRM EVIDENCE UNDER ,,,The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,,,,,,,,,,,, In litagation eg again later at Admin court /court of appeal in live proceedings asked under,,,PART 32 EVIDENCE

Notice to admit facts

32.18

(1) A party may serve notice on another party requiring him to admit the facts, or the part of the case of the serving party, specified in the notice.,,,,,,,,,,,ALL CORRESPONDENCE IGNORED AS THEY CORRUPT AND FRUSTRATE THE JUDICIAL PROCESS.



P JONES

NEWS STORY FOR MEDIA….This is repeat of Profuma sex affair case Have been forced into obtaining a criminal record to get this story out,end of therefore of my medical career,,,offered free of charge to vacinate Covid 19 6 days /week however informed via vetting now would not be accepted,,,Police and courts [civil not criminal] believe if we ignore correspondence we can get away with a miscarriage of justice, utter breach of Article 6,,,,,The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,,,,,,,,,Todays issue over restraining order due to complaint against police, as vexatious ,you have below the actual allegations in judicial review pasted, and in police own words admitting allegations, is this first time this has occured,,,,NO,,,court as you will see already in another vexatious restraining order paid compensation to me. Mirojuhys v Latvia …………………fairness of proceedings always assessed by examining them in entirety so that an isolated incident may not be sufficient to conclude proceedings as a whole unfair…. ,,,,,,consider above not first time,,,,Asked Tory MP Lopresti for help eg Legal Aid /ombudsman all correspondence as he confirms he will ignore,,,,knowing miscarriage of justice. Caused criminal damage at Patchway police station,[poured 5l can of oil in doorway] bet they have not informed media of offence, would not want why action taken, only way to get story out, [a court hearing] Tory MP Lopresti and police and local police PCC Mountstevens aware i would do this ,if correspondence ignored, they called my bluff knowing criminal series of offences will be made..... they will not want before a court, they will try to issue a caution, [will be refused] or as barrister stated,,,,will release without charge no public interest ,,,,will need to offend at another police station, or MP office [5L again of old oil] until sent to prison to die. Have one opening, at moment ,vindictive police have issued court summons as went through red light 1.2 seconds ,,,,yes 1.2 secs ,,,,max speed ,,,,wet road dangerous to brake ,,,,action taken due to complaints historic to police, given option no action if attend a day course,,,,easy way to conclude,,,,,however can defend via trial to bring out issues,not only above defence however just vindictive prosecution,,,police will take me to court over this,,,,,1.2 seconds,,,however historic evidence ,,,,,have lawyer in letter stating we commited perjury,,,,too late for you to do anything about it now, please see below.....we have court saying we commited offence malfeasance in public office however police refuse to deal with ADMITTED criminal offence. ,,,,,,,,,however take me to court over 1.2 seconds,,,,,WE HAVE AS IN EBRAHIMI CASE IN BRISTOL CORRUPTION BETWEEN POLICE AND COURT AS CRIMINAL OFFENCES IGNORED,,,ask MP for help, however as corrupt and bent as he has done for years ignore correspondence in pocket of police and the courts, this document in my website ,will follow up with new website www.jackloprestimpcorrupt.com say if facts untrue sue me ....MP Jack Lopresti,for example in last 18 months 32 emails all ignored, recently confirmed he would ignore all correspondence any subject …...my email……………...[part quote]
BELOW IS FINAL APPEAL TO POLICE BEFORE JUDICIAL REVIEW WILL BE OF INTEREST WHAT QUESTIONS THEY WISH TO ANSWER WHEN IN A HOLE STOP DIGGING. YOU CAN NOT DEAL WITH PSD AS AWARE SENT TO POLICE SG PRICE PATCHWAY POLICE STATION THE CPS DOCUMENT ON MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE, HAS SECTION ON POLICE CHARGING PRACTICE ON MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE SO AWARE POLICE CAN DEAL WITH ISSUE. HOWEVER MR CROACH LETTER 24.7.2017 KNOWING UTTERLY UNTRUE INFORMS ME ,,,,,IF YOU WANT TO COMPLAIN [CRIMINAL OFFENCE MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE ] ABOUT CONDUCT OF A JUDGE OR COURT STAFF YOU CAN ONLY DO VIA JCIO . ,,,THE POLICE HAVE NO POWER TO INVESTIGATE [CRIMINAL OFFENCE MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE] THE CONDUCT OF JUDICIARY OR COURT STAFF. BUT CROUCH KNOWS THIS IS UNTRUE AS SENT MUST BE IN FILE,,,,,,HE HAS POLICE CHARGING PRACTICE OF OFFENCE CRIMINAL OF MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE. .TAKE CROUCH LETTER 24.7.2017,,,,,,,,,,YOU HAVE BEEN TOLD FROM OUTSET THAT POLICE WILL NOT INVESTIGATE YOUR COMPLAINT CRIMINAL OFFENCE MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE. . COMPLAINT ACCEPTED BY PCBIRD LETTER 13.4.2017 GALLOWAYS LETTER 12.6.2017 WAS CRIMINAL OFFENCE MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE. SO WHAT CROUCH IS SAYING WE TOLD YOU WE WILL NOT INVESTIGATE CRIMINAL OFFENCE OF MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE. SO CROUCH IS CONFIRMING THE POLICE WILL WILFULLY NEGLECT TO PERFORM THEIR DUTY,,,,,BY DEFINITION MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE. WHEN WAS I TOLD THIS. ? ALL CALLS IN/OUT RECORDED. WAS LETTER SENT I HAVE NOT SEEN ONE. PCBIRD I BELIEVE ACTED AT START IN GOOD FAITH ASSUME NOT AWARE HMCS WOULD IGNORE CORRESPONDENCE TO THEM TOLD SG PRICE ALTHOUGH ON RECORDING WITH HER DID SHE NOT INFORM HIM. THEREFORE STANCE WE HAVE ALLEGATIONS OF MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE GET HIM TO SEND COMPLAINT TO US, WE HAVE TOLD HIM IN EMAIL HIS COMPLAINT WILL BE IGNORED. PCBIRD IN LETTER 13.4.2017 CONFIRM YOUR DIFFICULT TO CONTACT NO MOBILE WORKING AT LIBRARY DURING DAY,ON STUDIES ,,,,,WHEN WAS I TOLD THE POLICE WILL WILFULLY NEGLECT TO PERFORM THEIR DUTY AND NOT INVESTIGATE CRIMINAL OFFENCE OF MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE. WE HAVE FURTHER UTTER NONSENCE WHERE PCBIRD TOLD ME TO MAKE CLAIM TO HMCS KNOWING IT WOULD NOT BE READ AND AS CROUCH ADMITS DUE TO REGULATIONS I COULD NOT MAKE A COMPLAINT,,,,,SEE LETTER 24.7.2017 AT END OF THIS DOCUMENT. AS IN 2013/4 ISSUE MS MOUNTSTEVENS AWARE OF WHAT IS GOING ON BUT TURNS A BLIND EYE TO THIS PIG CIRCUS
NEWS STORY FOR MEDIA….This is repeat of Profuma sex affair case Have been forced into obtaining a criminal record to get this story out,end of therefore of my medical career,,,offered free of charge to vacinate Covid 19 6 days /week however informed via vetting now would not be accepted,,,Police and courts [civil not criminal] believe if we ignore correspondence we can get away with a miscarriage of justice, utter breach of Article 6,,,,,The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,,,,,,,,,Todays issue over restraining order due to complaint against police, as vexatious ,you have below the actual allegations in judicial review pasted, and in police own words admitting allegations, is this first time this has occured,,,,NO,,,court as you will see already in another vexatious restraining order paid compensation to me. Mirojuhys v Latvia …………………fairness of proceedings always assessed by examining them in entirety so that an isolated incident may not be sufficient to conclude proceedings as a whole unfair…. ,,,,,,consider above not first time,,,,Asked Tory MP Lopresti for help eg Legal Aid /ombudsman all correspondence as he confirms he will ignore,,,,knowing miscarriage of justice. Caused criminal damage at Patchway police station,[poured 5l can of oil in doorway] bet they have not informed media of offence, would not want why action taken, only way to get story out, [a court hearing] Tory MP Lopresti and police and local police PCC Mountstevens aware i would do this ,if correspondence ignored, they called my bluff knowing criminal series of offences will be made..... they will not want before a court, they will try to issue a caution, [will be refused] or as barrister stated,,,,will release without charge no public interest ,,,,will need to offend at another police station, or MP office [5L again of old oil] until sent to prison to die. Have one opening, at moment ,vindictive police have issued court summons as went through red light 1.2 seconds ,,,,yes 1.2 secs ,,,,max speed ,,,,wet road dangerous to brake ,,,,action taken due to complaints historic to police, given option no action if attend a day course,,,,easy way to conclude,,,,,however can defend via trial to bring out issues,not only above defence however just vindictive prosecution,,,police will take me to court over this,,,,,1.2 seconds,,,however historic evidence ,,,,,have lawyer in letter stating we commited perjury,,,,too late for you to do anything about it now, please see below.....we have court saying we commited offence malfeasance in public office however police refuse to deal with ADMITTED criminal offence. ,,,,,,,,,however take me to court over 1.2 seconds,,,,,WE HAVE AS IN EBRAHIMI CASE IN BRISTOL CORRUPTION BETWEEN POLICE AND COURT AS CRIMINAL OFFENCES IGNORED,,,ask MP for help, however as corrupt and bent as he has done for years ignore correspondence in pocket of police and the courts, this document in my website ,will follow up with new website www.jackloprestimpcorrupt.com say if facts untrue sue me ....MP Jack Lopresti,for example in last 18 months 32 emails all ignored, recently confirmed he would ignore all correspondence any subject …...my email……………...[part quote]
BELOW IS FINAL APPEAL TO POLICE BEFORE JUDICIAL REVIEW WILL BE OF INTEREST WHAT QUESTIONS THEY WISH TO ANSWER WHEN IN A HOLE STOP DIGGING. YOU CAN NOT DEAL WITH PSD AS AWARE SENT TO POLICE SG PRICE PATCHWAY POLICE STATION THE CPS DOCUMENT ON MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE, HAS SECTION ON POLICE CHARGING PRACTICE ON MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE SO AWARE POLICE CAN DEAL WITH ISSUE. HOWEVER MR CROACH LETTER 24.7.2017 KNOWING UTTERLY UNTRUE INFORMS ME ,,,,,IF YOU WANT TO COMPLAIN [CRIMINAL OFFENCE MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE ] ABOUT CONDUCT OF A JUDGE OR COURT STAFF YOU CAN ONLY DO VIA JCIO . ,,,THE POLICE HAVE NO POWER TO INVESTIGATE [CRIMINAL OFFENCE MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE] THE CONDUCT OF JUDICIARY OR COURT STAFF. BUT CROUCH KNOWS THIS IS UNTRUE AS SENT MUST BE IN FILE,,,,,,HE HAS POLICE CHARGING PRACTICE OF OFFENCE CRIMINAL OF MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE. .TAKE CROUCH LETTER 24.7.2017,,,,,,,,,,YOU HAVE BEEN TOLD FROM OUTSET THAT POLICE WILL NOT INVESTIGATE YOUR COMPLAINT CRIMINAL OFFENCE MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE. . COMPLAINT ACCEPTED BY PCBIRD LETTER 13.4.2017 GALLOWAYS LETTER 12.6.2017 WAS CRIMINAL OFFENCE MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE. SO WHAT CROUCH IS SAYING WE TOLD YOU WE WILL NOT INVESTIGATE CRIMINAL OFFENCE OF MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE. SO CROUCH IS CONFIRMING THE POLICE WILL WILFULLY NEGLECT TO PERFORM THEIR DUTY,,,,,BY DEFINITION MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE. WHEN WAS I TOLD THIS. ? ALL CALLS IN/OUT RECORDED. WAS LETTER SENT I HAVE NOT SEEN ONE. PCBIRD I BELIEVE ACTED AT START IN GOOD FAITH ASSUME NOT AWARE HMCS WOULD IGNORE CORRESPONDENCE TO THEM TOLD SG PRICE ALTHOUGH ON RECORDING WITH HER DID SHE NOT INFORM HIM. THEREFORE STANCE WE HAVE ALLEGATIONS OF MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE GET HIM TO SEND COMPLAINT TO US, WE HAVE TOLD HIM IN EMAIL HIS COMPLAINT WILL BE IGNORED. PCBIRD IN LETTER 13.4.2017 CONFIRM YOUR DIFFICULT TO CONTACT NO MOBILE WORKING AT LIBRARY DURING DAY,ON STUDIES ,,,,,WHEN WAS I TOLD THE POLICE WILL WILFULLY NEGLECT TO PERFORM THEIR DUTY AND NOT INVESTIGATE CRIMINAL OFFENCE OF MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE. WE HAVE FURTHER UTTER NONSENCE WHERE PCBIRD TOLD ME TO MAKE CLAIM TO HMCS KNOWING IT WOULD NOT BE READ AND AS CROUCH ADMITS DUE TO REGULATIONS I COULD NOT MAKE A COMPLAINT,,,,,SEE LETTER 24.7.2017 AT END OF THIS DOCUMENT. AS IN 2013/4 ISSUE MS MOUNTSTEVENS AWARE OF WHAT IS GOING ON BUT TURNS A BLIND EYE TO THIS PIG CIRCUS
scan picket

SCAN PICKET

scan redgrave

scan annex a

Police June


Scan 10594

scan 10494

scan 10475

scan cotter late



scan 10547

scan n244

scan 10246

photo 195

STATEMENT PUBLISHED IN WEBSITE MONDAY 21.12.2020 ,,,,WAS TODAY GOING TO EXPAND COMPLETE ,,,,,,,,,,,AS TAKING MATTER IN MY OWN HANDS

NOT HINDSIGHT THE STATEMENT CAN NOT BE GIVEN NOW MEDIA WILL UNDERSTAND WHY ON THE 4.1.2021,,,,, HOWEVER WILL BE ISSUED ON THE 4.1.2021 AS I SAY NOT HINDSIGHT MEDIA WILL SEE THIS WEEK IN MY DOCUMENTS,,,FURTHER THIS WEEK WILL ADD TIME FILED IN MY DOCUMENTS.





THE LETTER TO MP JACK LOPRESTI WILL BE POSTED ASAP APOLOGY FOR DELAY

EMAIL TO JACK LOPRESTI MP BRINGING ALL LOOSE ENDS TOGETHER

NOTE THIS DOCUMENT JUST PART OF EMAIL TO JACK .PARTIES SHOULD CONSIDER FULL EMAIL IN MY WEBSITE IN THEIR CONSIDERATION

PHILIP JONES V AVON SOMERSET POLICE INTERESTED PARTY HMCS CO/1731/2018

31 BIBURY AVE BS346DF

1/ Jack issue of corruption between police and courts as in Profuma affair, please see my relationship with Profuma affair /Christine Keeler in skeletal argument., events that bought down your government, parties copied into this document, eg newspapers. Jack seeking evidence ,accept you can not involved in court judgements, not asking you to, however seek evidence . For example historic issues back to 2010 however for example via statute complaints to police x2 in 2020 where they refuse to address complaint,just ignore. . You may ask why bother me just ask parties. Well we have FOR MANY YEARS BEEN ASKING PARTIES WHO BELIEVE THEY CAN IGNORE QUESTIONS IN UTTER BREACH OF ARTICLE 6 OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT AS THEY CORRUPT AND FRUSTRATE THE JUDICIAL PROCESS,,,The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,,,,,,,,,,,, In litagation eg at Admin court /court of appeal in live proceedings asked under,,,PART 32 EVIDENCE

Notice to admit facts

32.18

(1) A party may serve notice on another party requiring him to admit the facts, or the part of the case of the serving party, specified in the notice.,,,,,,,,,,,

which HMCS [courts] and police ignored…Lets ask again with reply to you Jack in 7 days,with no reply Jack ask you to ask them. Accept problem can I refer to your Mr Cobbs letter,many years ago, as i contacted you OVER SAME ISSUE TODAY for years the courts ignoring applications, and correspondence ,,,Bristol court ignored your Mr Cobbs letter with Mr Cobbs reply,,,,will write again to Bristol county court, Jack can not force them to reply. Do not expect many replies, however you will need information as asking you to present to His Hon Buckland as asking for State to provide legal aid, have exhausted all routes to them,,,,NO FIRM CONSIDERED MERITS, OR OTHER AGENCY eg also applications to Pro Bono Unit and Avon Bristol Law Centre a friend of yours Dr Gupta legal representive asking for legal help ect,,,if they wish in 7 days copy to me can inform you of their position,,,,,you will need to see merits of case before presentation. In scan evidence 2 you have the human rights act citings in respect to State providing legal aid. Further in respect to ombudsman separate issue you will need to see merits before you present case to ombudsman. AS NO REPLIES IN OBUDSMAN ISSUE YOU AND ME DO NOT KNOW COURT DEFENCE You may say,,,,I will not write to court/police no problems ,asked them to reply to you, with no replies in 7 days, ,,,,,you will not help will take matters into my own hands .Collected 5L of old oil from garage to throw everyweek into police/court doorways before sent to prison to die,due to heart condition. ;rejected simple cardiac surgery at present as this is my sole issue in life today.Best outcome for publicity to die in police custody to expose what has been going on for years. Lets list parties where ask for reply in 7 days, to you Jack, with no reply in 7 days ask you to ask questions. Tactics , after talking to retired district judge, only selected documents sent to parties, however parties must accept and consider the full email to you today can be found in www.corruptioninbristolcountycourt.com For example court only needs ,,,,scan evidence 4 and told to look in website to see rest of email sent to you Jack.

1/ POLICE ,,


We have restraining order as you appealed HHJBiggers judgement a copy of HHJCotters judgement.

In scan evidence 1 you have the actual judicial review application ,,,the skeletal argument also from application as you can see is just TWO ELEMENTS pasted. Further in scan evidence 1, you have police in own words ADMIITTING APPLICATION THIS WAS A IPCC INVESTIGATION AND WE DID NOT FOLLOW IPCC REGULATIONS,,,,FURTHER ,,,IN POLICE JUDGEMENT YOU HAVE NO EVIDENCE OF MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE THE COURTS IGNORING APPLICATIONS AND CORRESPONDENCE FOR YEARS WHERE YOU HAVE LETTER FROM COURT ,,,WE IGNORED YOUR APPLICATIONS COME AND TALK TO US,,,HAVE NUMEROUS DOCUMENTS DATE/STAMPED BY THE COURT WHICH WERE IGNORED...ectPOLICE JUDGEMENT COMES UNDER WEDNESBURY UNREASONABLENESS,,, ALLOWED AN APPEAL TO UTTER NONSENCE POLICE JUDGEMENT,, WHERE POLICE THE SECOND ELEMENT ADMIT IN OWN WORDS WE SENT REPLY TO AN ALLEGED APPEAL WHERE ONE NOT FILED BY YOU.CAN I CITE LOCAL QC BARRISTER AND JUDGE AGAIN CITED FROM JUDICIAL REVIEW APPLICATION


The elements [for offence] which can be extracted from the limited case law are: A public officer ,,,,,, Wilfully neglecting to perform her duty or wilfully misconducting herself ,,,,,,, To such a degree as to amount to an abuse of the public’s trust in the office holder ,,,,,, Without reasonable justification or excuse. Despite the criticism, there remains an appetite, at the Law Commission at least, to preserve an offence of misconduct in public office, or create a codified replacement. This appetite comes at least in part from recognition that the offence, at times, is the best description of the criminality involved: the public outrage comes not from the particular details of the misconduct, but from the sense of being wronged by an individual whose duty is to serve the public interest. . Kate Brunner QC

Have i been wronged by police ,,,correlate with actual judicial review application, in scan evidence 1 in a IPCC investigation admit we did not follow IPCC ,regulations ,we never talked to you, admitted in scan 10594 and sent a reply to an appeal where admit one not lodged scan 10475 10494,,,eg we obtained your email 22.7.2017 where it stated with no answer to questions,,,,,to obtain evidence to do THE appeal you would do appeal on/after the 28.7.2017 EMAIL 22.7.2017 CAN NOT BE AN APPEAL AS POLICE MAINTAIN IN THEIR REPLY OF 24.7.2017 PLEASE SEE DETAILS SCAN EVIDENCE 1

Have just one outstanding issue ASKING FROM ABOVE FOR NEARLY 3 YEARS,,FROM ABOVE The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,,,,,,,,,,,,


Notice to admit facts

32.188(1) A party may serve notice on another party requiring him to admit the facts, or the part of the case of the serving party, specified in the notice.,,,,,,,,,,, In litagation eg at Admin court /court of appeal in live proceedings asked under,,,PART 32 EVIDENCE


WHY DID I COME TO YOU DAY 1. FROM RECORDING WITH SGT PRICE DAY 1 TOLD TO PASTE CPS DOCUMENT MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE AND INSERT IN IT WHY I CAME TO YOU DAY 1. Eg MY COMPLAINT. DEFINED THE FEDJCAB DOCUMENT. Asking nearly 3 years ,,,under The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,,,,,,,,, In also litagation eg Admin court /court of appeal in live proceedings asked under,,,PART 32 EVIDENCE [CPR]

Notice to admit facts

Was this FEDJCAB document sent, which was also pasted in statute document ,,,,pre action protocol document for judicial review served on you 16.9.2017.

From above all correspondence ignored, lets just ask police the following questions,,,if they want can comment on above,also so be it police may say Jack ,,,eg FEDJCAB this was not CPS document we asked for and he sent,,,was not in pre action protocol for judicial review document ect,,,,,,Lets simplify this for them .THE CPS DOCUMENT AND CONTENTS FEDJCAB WAS,,THIS ,,,,,,,,,,SEND TO YOU ….JACK ASK THEM IN 7 DAYS TO INFORM YOU COPY ME VIA EMAIL IN REPLY

a/ Why did I come to you day 1 ,looking at correspondence even police agree was MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE. Was it as courts for years malfeasance in public office , ignoring applications and correspondence. Do you maintain it was as judiciary state,,,,,,,,,,,,malfeasance in public office as I WAS DISSATISFIED OVER THE YEARS SOLELY WITH JUDGEMENTS OF HHJDENYER .CAN WE EXPAND THIS IF POLICE STANCE ,,,,WILL YOU PLEASE SUPPLY ANY EVIDENCE YOU HAVE I CAME DAY 1 AS ,,,,SOLELY DISSATISFIED WITH JUDGEMENTS OF DENYER.OR DO YOU HAVE NO EVIDENCE CAN YOU SUPPLY TO JACK IN 7 DAYS EVIDENCE EMAIL COPY TO ME

b/ You state it was malfeasance in public office why I came to you,,,,this agreed,,,,from start,,,PCBirds letter,,,,,,,,,,,,can you confirm malfeasance in public office is a criminal offence, [your utterly aware of this identical situation where you ignored my complaint of criminal behaviour , as you did in Ebrahimi case where your officers convicted of criminal offence malfeasance in public office and jailed] .Further via statute is it correct you were wrong to state ,,,,,refer to JCIO [judicial conduct investigation office] as they state malfeasance in public office is a criminal offence, and via statute we can not investigate.,,,THATS WHAT JCIO STATE AND YOU DID CORRECT THING ,,, REPORT TO POLICE


c/ From Copwatch warned by barrister who i gave scanpicket to at court,,,,they may try to brush you off,,,sent Copwatch,,


For most people the police complaints process is a depressing waste of time. Not only do the police get to investigate themselves and help fellow officers escape misconduct charges, they get to handle appeals to…[further quotes from paper below ,,,,]


When it was recently reported that the police only investigate 4 out of 10 crimes, the Home Office responded by stating: “We expect the police to investigate ALL crime.”

And if the police start reciting huge chunks of legislation in a bid to get rid of you, don’t be afraid to remind them that it is not their job to interpret the law. It is their job to enforce it. The Home Office, the government and the courts are there to explain the fineries of legislation, not some lazy cop who has probably memorized it by rote just to help him pass a Sergeant’s exam……UNQUOTE


Police now say,,,,huge chunks of legislation in a bid to get rid of you,...,THAT CAN NOT INVESTIGATE AS COURT STAFF/JUDGES IMMUNE. Asking question again did you get CPS document on malfeasance in public office,,,was this in pre action protocol for judicial review in table of people convicted of offence malfeasance in public office,,,in CPS document were judgesconvicted ??????????????????? Being brushed off know not true



d/ From above you ignored my correspondence, can I refer to later unrelated complaints.,,,,,are we seeing as with courts malfeasance in public office,,,,police now ignoring applications for years,,,where you do the same believe if ignore he will go away,,,well soon old oil in your doorway also,,,,lets look at issues..

1.Can I refer to scan police june enclosed. A letter retired District Judge called appaling, ITS ,,undated ,,,,,incomprenensible ,,,,in utter breach of ECHR [criminal limb ] ,case law eg allegations not stated. The detail in scan evidence 6 .This complaint 1,6.2020,ASK AGAIN ,,,,can you please supply evidence of your allegations ,,, unsociable behaviour. YOU HAVE NO EVIDENCE. JUST VEXATIOUS DUE TO ABOVE TODAYS ISSUE .SUPPLY TO JACK IN 7 DAYS YOUR ALLEGATIONS.DETAILS IN SCANEVIDENCE 6,,,,POLICE IGNORECOMPLAINT

2/ The Salford court refused to issue unrelated proceedings as a restraining order in place,from evidence supplied from judiciary at Cardiff Admin court. Clearly discussions between HHJBigger and Legatt LJ, behind my back,as they corrupt and frustrate the judicial process ll no order in place,OR EVER MADE AT THIS TIME,,,,from Salford county court ,,,,we have been informed by judiciary ,,,Admin court Cardiff a restraining order in place, clear what has occurred here,,,,Bigger calls Legatt and asks behind my back for restraining order to be put in place. In my website expand this, as in Profuma affair corruption between police and courts paste people on restraining order government list. I am of course not on it One of people on list sends numerous violent emails, do not know woman, do not know why she is on list. NOT FROM MY WEBSITE,,,,there is a NEW SITE NOTHING TO DO WITH ME that just cite this woman, and reference ALSO ,,my site. Do not know why they did this, if grudge against woman why involve me, I just cite court restraining list.Go to police,over these violent emails, ,,,we will do nothing,,,,is this similar to Ebrahimi case. Then she states abuse continues,,,talked to police your mentally ill, your utterly delusionary. Complaint 17.10.2020 again police ignored,are we seeing pattern here as with courts,,,,,ignoring applications for years,,I ask today why are you making these libel allegations to this woman,,,who made them ????. So www.corruptionavonsomersetpolice.com and www.corruptioninbristolcountycourt.com made by someone who is mentally ill and delusionary , we ask media if true why officers have not sued for libel ?????????Leads as retired District judge stated we can use into todays issue, so police state facts are delusionary ….,,,SO DELUSIONARY


a/ From scan evidence 1 in judicial review application in IPCC investigation you ADMIT IN OWN WORDS WE DID NOT FOLLOW IPCC REGULATIONS .YOU SENT REPLY TO AN APPEAL WHERE ADMIT AN APPEAL NOT LODGED.am I delusinary or are facts correct simple question to police YES/NO CONFIRM WITH JACK

b/ I am mentally ill and DELUSIONARY WHY I CAME TO YOU DAY 1. Supply to Jack in 7 days any evidence you have I came day 1 as solely dissatisfied over the years of judgements of Denyer,,,SIMPLE QUESTION. YES/NO Can not be so as judical review application ..QUOTE ,,,, .Are these chronic events, Mirojuhys v Latvia …………………fairness of proceedings always assessed by examining them in entirety [malfeasance in public office] that an isolated incident may not be sufficient to conclude proceedings as a whole unfair…. ,,,,,,consider even 2018 issues, where even today applications ignored. UNQUOTE

THIS WAS ABOUT MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE IGNORING APPLICATIONS AND CORRESPONDENCE FOR YEARS STILL GOING ON IN 2018 ,THE ISSUE BEFORE THE COURT CAN BE NOTHING TO DO WITH JUDGEMENTS OF DENYER HE RETIRED IN 2017,,,,SEEK REPLIES IN 7 DAYS TO JACK PLEASE


2/ PCC MS MOUNTSTEVENS

In 1/ above you have questions to police, we ask you have been informed of questions ,you know miscarriage of justice ask you please talk to your officers to ensure questions are answered to Jack in 7 days. When in magistrates court can say we asked you to ensure reply, you ignored, as you pervert the course of justice. ,,, oil in police doorways, where in media reporting of magistrates case they can ask questions if you will not answer questions today.MOUNTSTEVENS CALL MY BLUFF OUTSIDE BRIDEWELL AS OIL IN YOUR DOORWAY AS YOUR OFFICERS COME OUT TO ARREST JUST ONE THING TO SAY ONLY WAY TO GET ANSWERS.BEST WAY TO DIE IN POLICE CUSTODY TO GET MAXIMUM PUBLICITY .SIMILAR WITH OIL IN DOORWAY OF COURT. YOU CAN NOT AS MUSLIM PEOPLE WATCH ME 24 HOURS A DAY...FURTHER A FRIEND TERMINALLY ILL STATED,,,YOU HAVE BUS PASS IF FIRST ATTEMPTS STOPPED YOU CAN GO SHOPPING I WILL TAKE OIL IN CAR CAN GIVE YOU OUTSIDE TO THROW. MOUNTSTEVENS YOU AND YOUR CORRUPT OFFICERS HAD YOUR FUN ANSWER QUESTIONS TO JACK IN 7 DAYS INCLUDING 2 COMPLAINTS IN 2020..WHO THE HELL DO YOUR OFFICERS THINK THEY ARE FOR EXAMPLE SAYING I AM MENTALLY ILL,,,DELUSIONARY...WHERE YOU ADMIT FACTS,,,SUPPLY TO JACK EVIDENCE I DID NOT COME TO YOU AS MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE AS COURTS IGNORING APPLICATIONS AND CORRESPONDENCE FOR YEARS

3/ COURTS/MR REDGRAVE,,,THE OMBUDSMAN ISSUE

Details in scan evidence 4. Skeletal argument ,,,Nov 2017 just a note and court N244 form sent to HHJCotter, where he asks for fee ,Visit court 5.12.2017 to obtain evidence to do application, where courts Mr Blair refused to answer questions or allow me to look at files, told make application to Cotter who will also ignore, which he did utter breach of Article 6. Demand N244 form state not leaving until allowed to add statement on the N244 , where deface stating not to be sent to Cotter until new N244 with application sent next day , and pay fee, made under,,Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS ,, application sent next day via email.,6.12.2017

As soon as retired district judge saw judgement stated not judiciary language however they are utter bastards, for example removal of restraining order not addressed. Went to court told we did not send to Cotter ,,,,ombudsman issue seek refund of fee. THE ONLY RESPONCE from court, which female barrister and judge stated who saw my website,,,its intellectual insolence,,,they state we looked in fee section for 6.12.2017 and can see no fee from you,,,,NO FEE REQUIRED,Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS ,,

Take up above with courts where all correspondence ignored,,,Jack as i state I do not know,,,,YOU DO NOT KNOW COURT DEFENCE SO TODAY YOU CAN NOT REFER TO OMBUDSMAN

a/ As yet another person who saw my website, a crown court judge stated,,,,i work on facts you have no evidence the court obtained application made under ADORISIO,,on the 6.12.2017,,,so ask today did you get,EMAILS ,,,,if no then Jack can send court receipts, further email of 7.12.2017,,,,

In application yesterday requested that page one of N244 lodged previously was removed and replaced with document sent to you yesterday. Can you please confirm done PLEASE SEE BELOW IS THIS CORRUPT COURT SAYING ALSO WE DID NOT GET EMAIL.

b/ Can Jack have copy of defaced removed N244 form. And actual N244 considered by Cotter. Chilling as QC female barrister and judge who saw my website,,,will we get can not find file or N244 missing,,,a document Cotter produced and forged my signature ????

c/ May see today the court stating was read by Cotter, then Jack of course no application to ombudsman,,,you made application was read no refund of fee. Court realise now in a catch 22 situation ,Cotter read so utterly aware why i went to police day 1 and was not as ,,,,dissatisfield with judgements of Denyer,,,he is just denying evidence before him,,further note again the appellant must have access to the relevant documents in the possession of the administrative authorities, ,,,Blair your not looking at file will be confirmed by Cotter,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Obligation incumbent on the administrative authorities: the appellant must have access to the relevant documents in the possession of the administrative authorities, if necessary via a procedure for the disclosure of documents (McGinley and Egan v. the United Kingdom, §§ 86 and 90). Were the respondent State, without good cause, to prevent appellants from gaining access to documents in its possession which would have assisted them in defending their case,or to falsely deny their existence, this would have the effect of denying them a fair hearing, in violation of Article 6 § 1 .....

d/ Leads to another issue in scan evidence 4 for detail, covers for example email 7.12.2017,,,.Visit court talk to PSU Bristol [now known support through court ]manager who talks to court Mr Hunt where agreed to confirm email evidence of documents before the court before judgement made under,,,Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS ,, Visit recorded as i state after Hunt left,,,,,,TALKING TO PSU MANAGER,,,FROM TAPE HE WILL IGNORE HE IS BENT ,,,,,NOT HINDSIGHT. Take up issue with Hunt and courts Pawsley where request ignored,,,,ask again today,,,,are these in file EMAILS


5.12.2017 timed 16.17 court receipt 16.17

6.12.2017 timed 15.33 15.35 15.45 court receipt same time

7.12.2017 timed 9.58 court receipt 9.59

21.12.2017 timed 11.00 court receipt 11.00.

29.12.2017 timed 4.22 know court had as HHJCotter admits he read as made under Adorisio,,,,,.

e/ Court may say was not read as no fee,,,ombudsman can not interfer with statute no fee required Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS ,,

Reason can not answer if did not read Cotter read wrong papers

Can I refer to ECHR case law,,,, a note from the lower court [Cotter] to the appellate court [court of appeal] aimed at influencing the latter court’s decision, even though the note did not set out any new facts or arguments (ibid., § 41); documents obtained directly by the judges, containing reasoned opinions on the merits of the case (K.S. v. Finland, §§ 23-

Had numerous contacts from my website, concerning Sharing v Preston cc from lawyers, for example female barrister manchester, male barrister Birmingham,,,they can I refer….

Can I refer to Sharing v Preston cc [2012] EWHC 515 where clearly Legatt LJ had judged case before looking at facts, ,,,,mind already made up,,,,,as he stated,,,,,facts of case in HHJCotters judgement,,,but this is story HHJCotter made up to corrupt and frustrate the judicial process , ITS WRONG ON FACTS eg why I went to defendants, as CPS FEDJCAP document ect FEDJCAB its in pre action protocol for judicial review document,,,,DID NOT GO TO DEFENDANTS OVER JUDGEMENTS OF HHJDENYER. From Sharing,, The ‘fair minded and independent bystander’ test used here should clearly be in the mind of any representatives who feel that they have been effectively rejected without serious hearing on appeal – IN EMAIL 13.7.2018 made under ADORISIO THE COURT OF APPEAL HAS THE FEDJCAP DOCUMENT,,,IT KNOWS I DID NOT GO TO DEFENDANTS OVER JUDGEMENTS OF HHJDENYER LEGATT LJ HAS EVIDENCE POLICE ADMIT APPLICATION AS HIGH COURT JUDGE STATED IS THIS JUDICIARY PROTECTING THEIR OWN

LEGATT JUST ACCEPTS COTTERS/BIGGERS WRONG JUDGEMENT ,,,,,FROM SHARING ,,,, in the mind of any representatives who feel that they have been effectively rejected without serious hearing on appeal – FROM ABOVE POLICE /MOUNTSTEVENS CAN CONFIRM MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE WHY DID I COME TO YOU DAY 1.


4/ IPCC ,,PRO BONO UNIT,,,NBT [see scan evidence 5] COMPUWAVE ,,,PSU BRISTOL , DR GUPTA COVERED IN EMAIL IF THEY HAVE ANY COMMENT TO MAKE ON DISPUTE OF ARGUMENTS IN SKELETAL ARGUMENT rest of email PRESENTED ASK THEM TO INFORM YOU JACK IN 7 DAYS WITH EMAIL COPY TO ME

5/ ICO [INFORMATION COMMINORES OFFICE] PLEASE SEE SKELETAL ARGUMENT AGAIN IF THEY WISH TO COMMENT TO YOU JACK,,,,AN ISSUE RAISED BEFORE. In scan evidence 5 have NBT not sending medical records, dragging me through the court to obtain. They did send third party medical records where asked for sae to return, so still have third party medical records,,,,,THIS INCOMPETANT TRUST WILL NOT SUPPLY MY MEDICAL RECORDS HOWEVER HAPPY TO SEND THIRD PARTY MEDICAL RECORDS BY MISTAKE. AGAIN SEEK DIRECTIONS FROM ICO AGAIN MAY WISH TO COMMENT TO YOU JACK IN 7 DAYS,,,EMAIL COPY TO ME.

6/ Again reference to skeletal argument plus rest of email ,,,if courts Cardiff/Birmingham/court of appeal wish to comment ask them to contact you Jack in 7 days with copy to me.Application made under

The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,,,,,,,,,,,,

Implication for example application back to court of appeal to remove order…..where standard stance if we ignore correspondence he will go away



SKELETAL ARGUMENT OF ISSUES-CORUPTION POLICE AND JUDICIARY

1/ Jack you can not get involved in court judgements, CO/1731/2018 , not asking you to. Can I put history to you, you are aware of much of this,wish to show where I seek your help today.This is urgent need resolution in next few weeks, as retired district judge stated perhaps reason not answering questions as soon out of time. Have main issue ignoring applications and correspondence for years utter breach of Article 6,,,,[we have court letter confirming they will commit breach,],The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,,,,,,,,,

Many years ago courts ignoring applications, and correspondence, had call one evening,,,,,well spoken male ,,,I do not approve of a one of your old applications to MY court,,,,[a district judge ?????] however will not stand by where corruption is going on HHJDenyer, and court out to get you, they have made a mistake, they have removed 2 applications,in this case however one in this new case still on system in that PRESENT AT TIME case,,,,,,[8 years ago]. Visit court talk to Mr Blair,,,,recorded,,,all I state just checking to see applications in file,,,,,from recording ask nothing else,,,live case,,,[true now 2 missing] we get reply,Blair ,,,nothing to do with me I check your applications, make sure you have evidence of being fee except,ect, and put in tray behind me,,,,,no one making allegations ,,,,is he responsible for removal of applications???. Is this not identical to Watergate,,,where Woodward/Bernsteine at Washington Post in deductions state we never asked about this, .....did not make any allegations the courts removing applications.However we know even later OBS80441 that applications, date/stamped by the court missing from file,,,,as at hearing a case I won, DJWatson states something very very odd here.


We seek reply from police, a MAIN issue, however later unrelated complaint 1.6.2020 and 17.10.2020 where told,,via EMAIL,, acknowledgement would be made in 10 days, their tactic like main issue just to ignore correspondence as they corrupt and frustrate the judicial process.. Seek their reply in 7 days to you Jack , with email copy to me. You will need evidence to present to Rt Hon Buckland. There will be no reply, as female QC barrister and judge stated who saw my website,,,,would be turkeys voting for Xmas. We please ask you to ask police for reply., if they ignore this document... If do not get replies will be offending every day, until sent to prison to die, have severe heart condition.simple surgery correction however have had enough. , From a garage have obtained 5L cans of old oil to throw in police/court doorways,,,,will have my day in court before the end. No one now to leave home and property to contacting Bristol Evening Post to make legal contract for them to leave everything to a deserving family,,,,,,Seek you please ask State [Rt Hon Buckland ] via human rights law,,,,please see scan evidence 2 to provide legal aid, HAVE EXHAUSED ALL CONTACTS INCLUDING PRO BONO UNIT and to present issue to ombudsman.MAIN ISSUE

vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv

This will reduce to police answering one question, MAIN issue,,why did I come to you day1. LITAGATION THERE ARE 2 SIDES OF ARGUMENT IN THIS CASE THERE IS DOCUMENT CONFIRMING WHY I WENT TO POLICE DAY 1 FROM RECORDING WITH SGT PRICE DAY 1 SHE ASKED TO PASTE CPS DOCUMENT ON MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE AND INSERT MY COMPLAINT INSIDE THE CPS DOCUMENT PLEASE SEE SCAN EVIDENCE 1 DEFINED THE FEDJCAB. DOCUMENT SENT TO SGT PRICE.PLEASE SEE SCAN 10594 WHERE SHE STATES ,,,DO NOT REMEMBER SEEING IT,,,,WILL REFER BELOW TO PROFUMA AFFAIR WHERE IN COURT HEARING MANDY RICE-DAVIES MADE COMMENT WE CAN STATE TO SGT PRICE TODAY AGAIN ,,,,SHE WOULD SAY ,THAT WOULDN*T SHE,,,,,HAVE POLICE RECEIPT,,,HAVE BEEN ASKING FOR OVER 3 YEARS WAS THIS DOCUMENT SENT IF NOT CAN I HAVE CPS DOCUMENT SENT WITH MY COMPLAINT,,,,SIMPLE QUESTION,,,ALSO THIS DOCUMENT IN STATUTE FEDJCAB DOCUMENT eg IN ,,,PRE ACTION PROTOCOL DOCUMENT FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW,,,,SERVED ON PARTIES 16.9.2017 AS STATUTE YES OR NO WAS IT IN APPLICATION SERVED ON YOU.ITS A SIMPLE QUESTION WAS IT IN PRE ACTION PROTOCOL FOR JUDICAL REVIEW DOCUMENT. YES OR NO

ASKING UNDER FOR 3 YEARS The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,,,,,,,,, AND WHILE IN LIVE LATER PROCEEDINGS AT ADMIN COURT AND COURT OF APPEAL UNDER,,,

CPR regulations PART 32 EVIDENCE


Notice to admit facts,,,,

32.18

(1) A party may serve notice on another party requiring him to admit the facts, or the part of the case of the serving party, specified in the notice.,,,,,,,,,,,HOWEVER P0LICE AND COURT JUST IGNORE CORRESPONDENCE ,,,SO AWARE OF DOCUMENT,,DID YOU DISPUTE EVIDENCE BEFORE YOU.. BEFORE THE COURT SIMPLE QUESTION YES OR NO,,,,ARE YOU SAYING RECEIPT IS A FORGERY for document CAN I DEFINE FEDJCAB,,,eg FATAL EVIDENCE DOCUMENT JUDICIARY CORRUPT AND BENT. Not trying to humiliate police just ask please answer question, was it as barrister advice to contact police,,,,malfeasance in public office as courts for years ignoring applications and correspondence. Can I refer to correspondence from police eg from Insp O Mahony scan 10594 where as she explains as my letter to police,,,we do not know if HHJDenyer malfeasance in public office ignoring applications,,,or malfeasance in public office of staff not sending applications/correspondence to him,,,,Blair above ????. As malfeasance in public office a criminal offence via statute could not complain to JCIO [JUDICIAL CONDUCT INVESTIGATION OFFICE] AS THEY CONFIRMED . Have from scan evidence 1,,,,police admit….in the IPCC investigation we did not follow IPCC regulations


What did I say , in judicial review, please see pasted copy of application to the court, in scan evidence1. There are 2 issues,I cited in judicial review application, as you can see,,,scanevidence 1,,,one that this was a IPCC investigation, where police did not follow IPCC regulations, ,,,

Regulations IPCC [independent police complaint commission] in a police investigation.,,,,sent to me ALSO COPY IN INTERNET

Contact to make sure have all details

Ask what you want to happen

Inform you what is likely to happen

Talk to you about way they will deal with your complaint

Let you know the outcome when they have finished , do in person or on phone ,BUT should also write to you and sent reply to your appeal where one not lodged. We have judicial review where HHJCotter /Bigger states vexatious to make allegations against police,,,where he has police admitting application,,we did not follow IPCC regulations in this IPCC investigation, and sent reply to an appeal where you had not lodged one. Although as he corrupts and frustrates the judicial process he has the FEDJCAB ect ect states …you went to police as SOLELY dissatisfied with judgements of HHJDenyer. Appeal to court of appeal, however as appealed restraining order issued. Can I quote female barrister and judge who saw my website,,,Bigger was never going to grant this application turkeys voting for Xmas. ,,a crown court judge,,,i am not making any allegations,,,however media may ask is Legatt LJ protecting their own,,,,To remove restraining order fee 50.00,,,,however after application told …..Master requires 528.00 to consider application. Can not find anyone to represent under legal aid, not on facts, will not consider even merits of case,eg no one to help you at moment, 100 applications,also Pro Bono Unit , Avon legal help, Jack a friend of yours legal representative Dr Gupta,,,ect. Ask TODAY for State to provide legal aid, please see human rights regulations in scan evidence 2. Jack ask you please to present when you have full evidence to Rt Hon Buckland for State to supply legal aid, as my Human Rights. You have evidence so case must be won,,,,over issue in restraining order, POLICE ACCEPT in the IPCC investigation we did not follow IPCC regulations, and sent reply to your appeal where one not lodged. WE HAVE THIS ONE OUTSTANDING ISSUE AGAIN FOR POLICE IN OWN WORDS TO ADMIT MY CLAIM I WENT MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE THE COURTS FOR YEARS IGNORING APPLICATIONS AND CORRESPONDENCE THIS IS CRIMINAL OFFENCE SO COULD NOT TAKE AS JUDICIARY STATE TO JCIO AS VIA STATUTE AS THEY STATE WE CAN NOT INVESTIGATE..POLICE WERE WRONG TO SUGGEST. AS LEGATTS JUDGEMENT Jack ask police to inform you in 7 days why I went to them day 1, with no reply as we expect ask you to contact them, they have demanded money to answer question. With no replies will take matters in my own hands. Stocking up with 5L cans of old oil from garage to throw in police station /court entrances, every week until sent to prison to die, have severe heart condition.,simple surgery to correct rejected,,,this is issue taking over my life,,,need to make point Copied PCC Ms Mountstevens into document, ask she ensures police reply to you Jack, say to her miscarriage of justice .will you withhold evidence that would prove my case., or are you happy, miscarriage of justice. Will have my day in court,these questions will be asked in magistrates court before sent to prison to die. Is this common practice of this force ignoring criminal allegations, where in end have fatality,,,,ask media to look at recent Ebrahimi case, where this forces officers jailed as ignored criminal allegations,as my case today

Court not police further to answer one question the OMBUDSMAN ISSUE ,,,,,was the application of 6,12.2017 read by HHJCotter, made under

Goc vTurkey,,,Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS , [where rest of issues fall into place]

If not read seek refund of fee

2/ As a young man, well over 40 years ago, interested in the Profuma affair, purchased the Denning Report ,the blue colured government publication still have it. Interesting issue today as in letters to national newspapers ,over 40 years ago, talked about CORRUPTION AND COLLUSION BETWEEN POLICE AND JUDICIARY AS WE HAVE TODAY. Can I refer to one reply from paper,,,,,,Christine Keeler was not innocent party in this matter, please see advert from adult Holland magazine,,,,,8mm films,,,,18 dollars ,,,,see Christine Keeler take penis in rectum, only homosexuals do this,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Sent letters to Ms Keeler., although main interest Steven Ward ,corruption of judiciary and police. Further aware from my newspaper cuttings of Tom Mangold, who covered this story, and his thoughts in recent BBC series,,,,,will forward this document to him. CORRUPTION POLICE AND COURTS AS WE HAVE TODAY IN MY CASE

3/ Had issues [all civil matters] with the courts,,,malfeasance in public office ,ignoring applications and correspondence for years , can I refer to same issue correspondence to my MP Jack Lopresti many years ago, with reply from Jacks staff, Mr Cobb,,,,,they [Bristol county court ]ignored my correspondence ,I will write again, Jack can not force them to reply,,,Ironic today ask parties for reply to Jack in 7 days ,copy to me via email, no replies ask Jack to write to court,,,,Jacks letters ignored,,can not force court/police to reply ,,where take matter in my own hands,,,,this document will save in police custody me repeating facts to attending lawyer.

4/ We have incidents please see www.corruptioninbristolcountycourt.com where have court hearings, with no defence filed,,,,told at hearing do you really want to come back after I make order for a defence to be filed,,,,[a case I won on day] ,,,,we had another case where asked to leave so DJBrittan could talk to defendants, later followed up issue with defendants as they made excuse not to talk,to Brittan ,,,REPLY ,,,,we would not be seen talking about case behind your back, for you to exploit at a later date. Case 2018 comes before HHJRalton, again case I won, where no defence filed.

5/ As ignoring correspondence and applications for years issued website www.corruptioninbristolcountycourt.com . The court then states remove or consequences, I WILL NOT BE BLACKMAILED,,THEN SEE WHAT CONSEQUENCES MEANT AS RESTRAINING ORDER MADE UTTERLY WITHOUT MERIT. WHAT WERE CASES CITED IN ORDER [2016]

a/ Please see scan evidence 4 for details, note defendants were Compuwave, Jack note Compuwave covered in this email if facts not correct ask them to email you Jack in 7 days. Not in cloud [OUTLOOK EXPRESS] wanted to backup emails,fear of libel, for example calling courts Mr Fowler corrupt and bent, many years ago in old judicial review application, asked as today for information to do application under The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,,,,,,,,,where Fowler states in utter breach of Article 6 ,,,,your questions will not be answered, not read, just put in file,,,,today from same Bristol court get IDENTICAL reply from Ms Pawsy. On invoice Compuwave state program to back up, which did not work, call them told was working when you left shop,,,proceedings issued, where defendants admit error in their program on invoice, settlement sent to the court, please see scan evidence 4 for settlement sent and court receipt. Heard nothing in settlement had asked ALSO for removal from hearing list, matter settled, called court recorded told ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,HHJDenyer removed from hearing list no need to turn up for hearing your matter settled. FELL INTO A TRAP,,,CONSEQUENCES ,,,NOT REMOVED WHERE CASE STRUCK OUT NO ONE OF COURSE ATTENDED HEARING .Send recording to court not to come to hearing, appeal, corrupt Denyer rejects can see what consequences means, where RESTAINING ORDER MADE AS I APPEALED. DENYER YOUR CORRUPT AND BENT EVERY RIGHT TO APPEAL ,,,SETTLED CLAIM,,,YOU ORGANISED THIS

b/ Denyer cites further case in restraining order,,,, against NBT [North Bristol NHS Trust] This was for medical records, travel expenses , and to put statement in medical records. Jack again NBT sent this document today , if facts not correct ask them to inform you Jack in 7 days, with copy to me of reply. Initial hearing comes before DJWatson, where asks in 28 days for statement from third party of defendants, where he then strikes out claim, in papers after obtaining statement,,[statement untrue] I appeal. Say to NBT you must supply medical records, put statement in medical records, pay travel expenses, eg MY POC [PARTICULARS OF CLAIM] settle claim now please, NBT SAY NO. Six months later a few days before APPEAL hearing NBT ask to settle , supply medical records , agree to put statement in medical records, and pay travel expenses, they send settlement to court rejected by DJBrittan . At hearing NBT ask DJWatson [second hearing] that judgement reads I acted unreasonably, where he stated ... NO ,,,not saying this, ,,,,AWARE 6 MONTHS BEFORE NBT COULD HAVE SETTLED MATTER ON TERM THEY NOW ASKED TO SETTLE . Can I refer at time clear always audio recording of hearing, asked in email ,,if video made as new court, ,,,CORRESPONDENCE IGNORED,,,could not get into conversation at hearing as defendants keep on asking judgements reads I acted unreasonably… could not get in to conversation, as DJWatsons right hand raised towards me. NO COMPLAINT TODAY OF DJWATSON CLEAR WASTE OF HIS TIME DID NOT WANT TO DISCUSS ISSUE CLEAR I HAD NOT ACTED UNREASONABLY Parties were asked to make witness statements, [never one made from NBT] however DJWatson waved my statement to defendants,,AWARE ,I ASKED THEM 6 MONTHS BEFORE TO SETTLE TO SUPPLY MEDICAL RECORDS PUT STATEMENT IN MEDICAL RECORDS AND PAY TRAVEL EXPENSES,,THEN 6 MONTHS LATER ASK TO SETTLE AND SUPPLY EVERYTHING AS THE POC

THIS CORRUPT AND BENT JUDGE DENYER CITES THIS APPEAL,,AGAINST DJWATSONS INITIAL JUDGEMENT ,HIS REASON TO ISSUE RESTRAINING ORDER ,PICKED WRONG HISTORIC CASE CAN I REFER TO

Brumarescu v Rumania ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,fundamental aspect of rule of law is the principle of legal certainty which requires that when the courts have finally determined an issue then ruling should not be called into question…………Tregubello v Ukrain ,,,,,,,,,,calling into question in this manner whether it be by a judge or exective

IS DENYER ,,,,,calling into question judgement of DJWatson ??????? NOT ACTED UNREASONABLY ,,YOU WILL SEE 3 APPLICATIONS TO REMOVE THIS RESTRANING ORDER IGNORED BY COURT,,EVERY RIGHT TO APPEAL..WOULD NEVER HAVE OBTAINED MEDICAL RECORDS GET STATEMENT IN MEDICAL RECORDS GET TRAVEL EXPENSES WITHOUT APPEAL LODGED ,,,,DENYER YOUR CORRUPT AND BENT I WILL NOT BE BLACKMAILED

6/ Still ignoring applications. Had enough start picketing at the court,,,,malfeasance in public office ignoring applications and correspondence for years, please see scan picket, where barrister who I gave scanpicket to, told me to report to police, when he left court.

7/ Please see scan evidence 1, seen by Sgt Price where asks to paste CPS document on malfeasance in public office and to insert my police complaint, FEDJCAB document. Police have letter from court,,,,we ignored your applications come and talk to us,,,ect ect,,,had documents stamped/dated by the court as obtained,,,,,,,ignored . Police reply comes under Wednesbury unreasonableness you have no evidence of malfeasance in public office for years courts ignoring applications, and correspondence. THEY HAVE THE COURT SAYING WE IGNORED YOUR APPLICATIONS

8/ Therefore wish to appeal. Asking police 11 questions in 22.7.2017 email saying with no reply by the 28.7.2017 assume no reply, would then do appeal, , police stated previously if doing an appeal need to enclose our appeal form,,,.GET EMAIL 24.7.2017 REPLY TO EMAIL 22.7.2017 THEY HAVE NO APPEAL FORM THEY ALLEDGE LETTER 24.7.2017 IS REPLY TO MY APPEAL OF 22.7.2017….I HAVE NOT SERVED AN APPEAL

9/ Contact IPCC [again covered them today in this document, if they wish to address you Jack in 7 days]where advised judicial review, what were issues please see scan evidence 1,,you have application issue,,,they did not follow IPCC regulations,in IPCC investigation, in scan evidence 1 admit this, and sent reply to an appeal where one not lodged,,,not in dispute can I refer to scan 10475/94 ,,,,,POLICE STATE

eg,,You then emailed in reply 22.7.2017 and accused,,,,,,, of sweeping under the carpet…..You also said will assume with no email reply by 9.00 am 28.7.2017 there would be no reply and can do appeal to you.

10/ From above as Denyer issued restraining order,,,as I appealed judgements as ,,,,,a case settled,,,TOLD NOT TO ATTEND HEARING SETTLED CLAIM and ,,,,APPEALED DJWatson, INITIAL JUDGEMENT AS MEDICAL RECORDS TRAVEL EXPENSES AND ISSUE OF PUTTING STATEMENT IN MEDICAL RECORDS STILL OUTSTANDNG ,,,,,POC WAS THEREFORE STILL OUTSTANDING ,,, THEY ASKED TO SETTLE A FEW DAYS BEFORE HEARING 6 MONTHS LATER,,,,SUPPLING EVERYTHING AS THE POC .THIS DENYER ORDER JUST VEXATIOUS,,,,COMES UNDER COURT CORRESPONDENCE REMOVE YOUR WEBSITE OR CONSEQUENCES,,,,I WILL NOT BE BLACKMAILED BY CORRUPT AND BENT DENYER

11/ As above restrainng order in place, VIA statute have to make first application to court to issue proceedings, send note/court N244 form where HHJCotter asks for fee. Visit court 5,12,2017 to obtain evidence to do application, however utter breach of Article 6

The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,,,,,,,,,

Retired District Judge advised need also in application to remove restraining order or judgement could be thrown at you later. For example 5.12.2017 court visit, ask is settlement of B26YM042 in file, every right to appeal as struck out in papers, matter settled, from above, from recording as settled told not to turn up for hearing, trap set by Denyer ,,,defendants asked to settle, case should not have been struck out. Ask Mr Blair is settlement in file, where refuses to answer any questions , issue followed up in email of the 7.12.2017 ignored by the court,eg title of email urgent for Mr Blair ‘’

4/ We have from file see asked several times with no reply, can I please ask again, case b26ym042 this was settled BEFORE hearing via Tomlin order defendants wanted to use, is this Tomlin order in file please

Wanted information to follow up application made on the 6.12.2017 under

Goc vTurkey,,,Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS , ,,so could add further evidence under Adorisio,,,,BLAIR IGNORED EMAIL OF 7.12.2017

Mr Blair on the 5.12.2017 refused to disclose evidence or allow me to look at files, details in scan evidence 4, utter breach of Article 6

The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,,,,,,,,,

Saying 5.12.2017 [Blair] make application to HHJCotter who will also ignore. Demand N244 court form, see format scan N244, eg what I want court to do, deface it state on it not to be sent to HHJCotter until new N244 court form, and further evidence sent to HHJCotter,,,,made under,

Goc vTurkey,,,Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS , ,,agreed with Mr Blair where now pay court fee,,,,.In scan evidence 4 you have follow up emails in Dec 2017 to the court, read by HHJCotter from judgement. We have judgement which retired District Judge states not judicial language, however they are utter bastards.

a/ Application to remove restraining order just ignored. AGAIN IGNORED AS BENT AND CORRUPT COTTER KNEW ISSUED UTTERLY WITHOUT MERIT

b/ States vexious to make allegations against police, the actual allegations in scan evidence 1,paste of judicial review application, where police admit allegations in judicial review application, scans 10594/10475/10494.

c/ In judgement Cotter accepts application as malfeasance in public office ,,,as criminal offence aware via statute could not complain to JCIO,,,,aware why I went to police day 1.

d/ States I went to police as malfeasance in public office as solely dissatisfied with judgements of HHJDenyer. Over the years. Police were correct to state make complaint to JCIO. The bent and corrupt Cotter is denying evidence before him,,,the FEDJCAB document, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,WENT MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE IGNORING APPLICATIONS FOR YEARS AND CORRESPONDENCE AS CRIMINAL OFFENCE AS JCIO STATE TO HIM COULD NOT REFER TO THEM

12/ Feb 2018 require later medical records [ a later date when first proceedings issued, could not be included in previous litagation] ,,,NBT AGAIN REFUSED TO SUPPLY MEDICAL RECORDS ,,,STRUCK OUT BY COTTER IN 48 HOURS .in papers. Appeal given hearing date, where then Cotters clerk states in correspondence long talk with NBT on way to settle matter, and considered her evidence on matter, hearing removed from hearing date and .a new hearing date .would be issued,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.MY

EMAIL 25.2.2018,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,WITH N244 APPLICATION ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,TO SEE FILE WHAT WAS AGREED WITH COTTERS CLERK AND NBT BEHIND MY BACK NO DEFENCE TO MY CLAIM AGAIN


Ruiz –Materis v Spain,,,,,,,,,,,,,,plaintiff to have knowledge and comment on all evidence adducted or observations filed,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

APEH et al v Hungary ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,it is inadmissible for one party to make submissions to a court without knowledge of the other and on which the later has no opportunity to comment,,,,

FROM APPLICATION,,,TO LOOK AT FILE WHAT WAS ,,,APEH et al v Hungary ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, submissions to a court without knowledge of the other ,,,,,,FURTHER


I will from start today make a stance, i will not tolerate any fresh nonsense defendants lawyer Ms Smith puts before the court. I REQUEST BY 5.00 PM 26.2.2018 SHE SENDS TO ME VIA EMAIL HER COMMENTS TO THIS ORDER.WITHOUT THIS WILL REQUEST AN ADJOURNMENT SO I CAN AT A LATER DATE PRODUCE DOCUMENTS IN TERMS OF ALLEGATIONS FILED AFTER I SEE DEFENCE .

Are we going to have the utter nonsense as in OBS08441 which i won where DJWatson states,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,do you want to come back after i get you a defence, …..UNQUOTE



APPLICATION IGNORED BY COTTER AS LATER IN JUDICIAL REVIEW APPLICATION, TO BIGGER I STATE,,MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE IGNORING APPLICATIONS FOR YEARS STILL GOING ON IN 2018,,,,COURT UTTERLY AWARE THIS IS MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE IGNORING APPLICATIONS FOR YEARS STILL GOING ON IN 2018


APPEAL ,,,,AT HEARING HHJRALTON STATED,,,,HAD LONG TALK WITH COTTER REASON HE STRUCK OUT AS POC UTTERLY INCOMPREHENSIBLE ,,,,[THIS IS STANDARD COURT DEFENCE WHEN PRESENTED WITH OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE] YOU HAVE POC ????????????????? ,,,SUGGEST REASON REMOVE YOUR WEBSITE OR CONSEQUENCES WE WILL STATE ANY NONSENCE ,,,,WILL NOT BE BLACKMAILED ALSO BELOW AGAIN,,,,INCOMPREHENSIBLE WHAT I WANTED COURT TO DO ????????

IN THE BRISTOL COUNTY COURT CASE NUMBER


PLAINTIFF PHILIP JONES

DEFENDANTS NORTH BRISTOL NHS TRUST

CLAIM ,,,eg asking court

For defendants to release medical records of 24.7.2015 and for plaintiff to put a statement in DEFENDANTS medical records.

LEGAL BASIS ,,,,,1/ ,No evidence required in terms of obtaining medical records, in terms of putting statement in medical records, please see statutory regulations of NHS ,,,,,,the defendants must allow if requested for plaintiff to add statement to his medical records UNQUOTE

ASK MEDIA WAS IT UTTERLY INCOMPREHENSIBLE WHAT I WANTED COURT TO DO ????? OR IS COTTER UTTERLY BENT OR IS HE FIT TO BE A JUDGE,,,,INCOMPREHENSIBLE ???????

At hearing defendants agree AGAIN to supply medical records, dragging me again through the courts again and put statement in medical records.

NBT refuse to supply, ask to look at my medical notes where my statement not in file...ask lady of NBT supervising to show me statement [visit recorded] where she could not find. Get then third party comments of medical records required, where NBT refuse to supply copy ,,,notes taken on day. Talk at court to PSU , [NOW KNOWN SUPPORT THROUGH COURT] where must admit court more than helpful, where between court and PSU suggested at this stage no N244 form for a court order, but send letter to HHJRalton saying his order ignored. Follow up visits to the court,,,,although Ralton aware his order ignored, told on recorded visit,,,,,RALTON HAS NO COMMENT TO MAKE ALTHOUGH AWARE FROM ORDER COULD MAKE FRESH APPLICATION TO THE COURT TO HIM

13/ The old restraining order had expired, retired District Judge wanted it removed however the court 3 times ignored applications, LAST ONE 6.12.2017 has they have done for years. So could do anyway application in judicial review. So application to Cotter to look at files,,, The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,,,,,,,,, eg is settlement of B26YM042 in file ect COTTER IGNORES APPLICATION,,,

APPLICATION IGNORED BY COTTER AS LATER IN JUDICIAL REVIEW APPLICATION, TO BIGGER ,,MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE IGNORING APPLICATIONS FOR YEARS STILL GOING ON IN 2018 SO BIGGER UTTERLY AWARE THIS IS MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE IGNORING APPLICATIONS FOR YEARS AND STILL GOING ON IN 2018. CITE THIS ISSUE IN DETAIL IN APPLICATION ,,NOTHING TO DO WITH JUDGEMENT OF DENYER

JACK I CONTACT YOU COPY COURT INTO EMAIL WHERE NOW HE ANSWERS APPLICATION,,,,,SCAN COTTERLATE UTTER BREACH OF ARTICLE 6 STATES ASK MR BLAIR KNOWING BLAIR SAID NO,,,ARE THEY IN UTTER BREACH OF ARTICLE 6 AS BLAIR SAID HE WOULD ON THE 5.12.2017 COLLUSION BETWEEN THEM

The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,,,,,,,

THIS REPLY WAS 2 MONTHS LATER HAD TO DO JUDICIAL REVIEW OR WOULD BE OUT OF TIME WAS THIS WHAT COTTER WAS AFTER TO STOP JUDICIAL REVIEWHAD TO DO WHERE EVIDENCE WITHHELD


14/ Need to issue judicial review application, make application late March 2018 as in 2017 to obtain evidence to do judicial review application 12.3.2017 application to obtain evidence ignored by Cotter,,,utter breach of Article 6.

The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,,,,,,,,,

Admin court Cardiff also previosly ignoring applications, so as retired district judge advice under Practice Directives 54D 5.2 application to Birmingham Admin ,court to hear the judicial review. From Goc vTurkey,,,Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS , sent recording with Sgt Price, sent the FEDJCAB document ,[knows why i went to police day 1 ] ect,,,,Birmingham reject application stating all papers sent to Cardiff ,case will be heard in Cardiff. [Could ask corruption of judiciary Practice Directives 54D 5.2 where case could be heard elsewhere ,where parties as regulations had no objection case heard at Birmingham] HHJBigger in judgement identical to HHJCotter. Again as female barrister and judge stated was never going to grant application, turkeys voting for Xmas as inviting police in to investigate malfeasance in public office this court ignoring applications for years also. Ask Birmingham to confirm documents sent to them under ADORISIO ,and Cardiff court to confirm documents sent to them under ADORISIO from Birmingham, where both corrupt and frustrate the judicial system where refuse to answer question .ASK AGAIN TODAY REPLY TO YOU JACK COPY TO ME Further in judicial review application, request for order to obtain evidence, for example to look at files to do application, The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,,,,,,,,,WHERE IN UTTER BREACH OF ARTICLE 6 BIGGER IGNORES APPLICATION. BIGGER AS ADVISED WAS NEVER GOING TO GRANT APPLICATION TURKEYS VOTING FOR XMAS. NOTE JUDGEMENT IDENTICAL TO COTTERS,,,WENT AS DISSATISFIED WITH JUDGEMENTS OVER THE YEARS OF DENYER ,,,NO,,,FROM APPLICATION AS EXPLAINED CAN NOT BE TRUE AS APPLICATION FROM ABOVE STATES,,,,,,PRACTICE STILL GOING ON IN 2018 MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE APPLICATIONS AND CORESPONDENCE IGNORED,,,DENYER RETIRED IN 2017,,,QUESTION TODAY TO POLICE IN OWN WORDS WHY DID ICOME TO YOU DAY 1 ????????’PLEASE ANSWER QUESTION FOR JACK. STATES VEXATIOUS TO MAKE ALLEGATIONS AGAINST POLICE,,,WHERE AWARE POLICE ADMIT ALLEGATIONS IN THEIR OWN WORDS ,,,AS RETIRED JUDGE SAID WHERE ARE WE RUSSIA/CHINA

15/ Application to court of appeal, please see scan 10547, again seeking court order to obtain evidence to complete application, ignored by Legatt LJ, utter breach of Article 6,,,The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,,,,,,,,While before the court of appeal wish to issue proceedings over a utter unrelated event. All money claims must go through Salford county court. Application rejected by Salford as restraining order in place. All calls in and out recorded where from Salford it appears Admin court Cardiff judiciary had instructed Salford court not to issue my proceedings. Email Cardiff court no order in place, CONFIRM ,PLEASE ,,emails ignored. Take up issue with PSU [now known as support through court] Bristol where they contact the Bristol court where inform PSU we can see no order in place. Go back to Salford where claim NOW issued, paided by defendants return of post and Salford offer 50.00 compensation. Money not issue ask who in judiciary at ADMIN COURT CARDIFF INFORMED THEM THAT RESTAINING ORDER IN PLACE AND NOT TO ISSUE ANY OF MY PROCEEDINGS. GET REPLY FROM MANAGER QUESTION NOT ANSWERED AT SALFORD COURT HOWEVER STATE,,,50.00 COMPENSATION UTTER TOO LITTLE AND 150.00 PAID, ASKED QUESTION AGAIN EMAIL IGNORED. ASK TODAY TO SALFORD COURT CAN WE PLEASE HAVE COPY OF DOCUMENT WHERE YOU WERE UNABLE TO ISSUE PROCEEDINGS DUE TO JUDICIARY IN CARDIFF

We may ask ,,,,judiciary ,,,Cardiff Admin court was this HHJBigger,,,now saying to Legatt LJ,,,,COULD YOU ISSUE RESTRAINING ORDER FOR ME. Send to Legatt FEDJCAB,,,knows i went to police as malfeasance in public office ignoring applications and correspondence for years, as criminal offence could not complain to JCIO , Cotter/Bigger wrong, sent POLICE documents where Legatt LJ aware as judicial review application, in this IPCC investigation, police ignored IPCC regulations and sent reply to an appeal where one not lodged. Can i refer to Crown court judge who saw my website,,,,,,not making any allegations, however media may ask is Legatt LJ protecting their own, as he issues restraining order as i appealed.WAS THIS FROM REQUEST FROM BIGGER

16/ From Legatts order have to ask parties if they object to removal of restraining order, no objection filed,,,,court states,,,,,we do not wish to be involved an issue between you and police, we were just a interested party., POLICE ignore my email,,,no objection ,ASK AGAIN TODAY TO INFORM YOU JACK IF THEY HAVE ANY OBJECTIONS JACK YOU CAN SAY TO BUCKLAND THE POLICE HAVE NO OBJECTION THAT ORDER IS REMOVED. Legatt states facts of case in Biggers judgement, a identical copy of Cotters judgement,,,,however it was not vexious to make claim against police, LEGATT AWARE FROM EMAILS Goc vTurkey,,,Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS , in own words admit application, and from FEDJCAB did not go to police as solely ,,,dissatisfied with judgements of Denyer,,,,,,WE SAY TO POLICE TODAY IF YOU HAVE ANY EVIDENCE IN 7 DAYS YOU SUPPLY TO JACK EVIDENCE DAY 1 I CAME TO POLICE AS SOLELY DISSATISFIED WITH JUDGEMENTS OF DENYER, FROM FEDJCAB LEGATT DENYING EVIDENCE BEFORE HIM,,LEGATT BEFORE STOPPED ,,,access to the relevant documents in the possession of the administrative authorities, IGNORED MY APPLICATION ,,

Obligation incumbent on the administrative authorities: the appellant must have access to the relevant documents in the possession of the administrative authorities, if necessary via a procedure for the disclosure of documents (McGinley and Egan v. the United Kingdom, §§ 86 and 90). Were the respondent State, without good cause, to prevent appellants from gaining access to documents in its possession which would have assisted them in defending their case, or to falsely deny their existence, this would have the effect of denying them a fair hearing, in violation of Article 6 § 1 .....

IN PROFUMA CASE HAD CORRUPTION BETWEEN POLICE AND COURTS HAVE SAME ISSUE TODAY. COURT PROTECTING POLICE

17/ Application to remove order.

From internet 2 entries one in lower case, one in upper case type ,,,,,,,,,,,fee to change/amend order…..50.00 was sent with application . eg from official HMCS site actual document


•Application to vary (amend/change) a judgment (or order), suspend enforcement or suspend a warrant of possession or stay at High Court £50.

Eg to vary, amend order

Via (Göç v. Turkey / Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS , Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,,,further evidence therefore sent with application where HMCS return application, demands 528.00 to remove restraining order. In Legatts LJ order states he would hear any application, where issue challenged Application made for Legatt LJ not to hear appeal, where Master [judge] states would be heard by Legatt OR another judge, partial victory, application however need 528.00 application was under,,,

,,,,,,A Court of Appeal in which the trial judges are called upon to ascertain whether or not they themselves committed an error of legal interpretation or application in their previous decision can raise doubts as to impartiality , San Leonard Band Club v. Malta, however clear stance of Legatt from judgement,,,,,vexatious to make claim against police,,HE have police in OWN WORDS ADMITTING CLAIM DENYING EVIDENCE BEFORE HIM,,,,,,,,,,,,,,the facts of case in HHJCotters judgement.,,,,,,,,,copied by HHJBigger, ,but I did not go to defendants [police] over judgements of HHJDenyer, LEGATT KNOWS THIS SENT FEDJCAB IS THIS AS PROFUMA CASE COURTS PROTECTING POLICE POLICE KNOW THIS KNOW MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE AND CAN NOT ANSWER QUESTION TODAY ,,,WHY I WENT DAY 1 defendants police asked in first meeting to send CPS document on malfeasance in public office and show how it relates to my complaint, eg FEDJCAP complete document , plus scan 13.4.2017 letter,in scanevidence 1, went over malfeasance in public office courts ignoring applications for years,back to 2010,,,and FEDJCAP also later in pre action protocol document for judicial review HHJCotters /Biggers judgement IN UTTER TATTERS,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, why I went day 1,,CLAIM NOT VEXATIOUS POLICE ADMIT FACTS


Can I refer to Sharing v Preston cc [2012] EWHC 515 where clearly Legatt was either protecting the police as in Profuma case, OR had judged case before looking at facts, ,,,,mind already made up,,,,,as he stated,,,,,facts of case in HHJCotters judgement,,,copied by HHJBigger,,,but this is story HHJCotter made up to corrupt and frustrate the judicial process , ITS WRONG ON FACTS eg why I went to defendants, as CPS FEDJCAP document ect FEDJCAB its in pre action protocol for judicial review document,,,, From Sharing,, The ‘fair minded and independent bystander’ test used here should clearly be in the mind of any representatives who feel that they have been effectively rejected without serious hearing on appeal – IN EMAIL 13.7.2018 THE COURT OF APPEAL HAS THE FEDJCAP DOCUMENT,,,IT KNOWS I DID NOT GO TO DEFENDANTS OVER JUDGEMENTS OF HHJDENYER As judge stated who saw my website,,,,making no allegations, however people may ask is Legatt protecting their own,,,human rights issue,,,


Legatt LJ from evidence before him know Cotter/Bigger wrong is he protecting his own, as in Profuma case where courts protect police.

Had numerous contacts from my website, concerning Sharing v Preston cc from lawyers, for example female barrister manchester, male barrister Birmingham,,,

Can I refer to Sharing v Preston cc [2012] EWHC 515 where clearly Legatt LJ had judged case before looking at facts, ,,,,mind already made up,,,,,as he stated,,,,,facts of case in HHJCotters judgement,,,

LEGATT JUST ACCEPTS COTTERS/BIGGERS WRONG JUDGEMENT ,,,,,FROM SHARING ,,,, in the mind of any representatives who feel that they have been effectively rejected without serious hearing on appeal

Contact the court under The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,,,,,,,,,is 528.00 correct are the emails,,,,in file made under , , Goc vTurkey,,,Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS ,,, where Legatt LJ has FEDJCAB,,,knows did not go to police as ,,,,dissatisfied with judgements of Denyer, aware not vexatious to make claims against police HAVE POLICE IN OWN WORDS ADMITTING ALLEGATIONS. Court of appeal corrupts and frustrates the judicial proceess ignore correspondence and follow up emails

Ask appeal court today in 7 days to reply to you Jack with email copy to me. Were the application made under Adorisio,,,,,before Legatt LJ or were they removed by the the court to corrupt and frustrate the judicial process .(Göç v. Turkey / Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS , ... Seek state to provide legal aid, please see main text.

18/ OMBUDSMAN ISSUE PLEASE SEE SCAN EVIDENCE 4 FOR DETAILS SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

Visit court5.12.2017 to obtain evidence to make application to Cotter , The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,,,,,,,,,where Mr Blair in utter breach of Article 6, refuses to answer any questions, refuses me to look at files to obtain evidence, restates make application to Cotter who will ignore your request , clearly tactics agreed before, utter breach of Article 6 please see above, Deface court N244 form state on it not to be sent to Cotter, until new N244 and application next day ,sent via email 6.12.2017, made under (Göç v. Turkey / Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS , On this agreement with Blair pay court fee.

From judgement retired district judge stated not judicial language however they are utter bastards, application not read, go to court where told we did not send, where ask for refund of fee, now today in complaint process before Resolver. You have in scan redgrave ,,,we looked in court fee register no fee paid 6.12.2017,,,THAT IS ALL WE HAVE,,,however from Adorisin no fee required. Jack you can not send case to ombudsman as do not know facts asked under The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,,,,,,,,,COURTS IGNORE CORRESPONDENCE

Jack at present you can not send to ombudsman, do not know court stance. Asked under Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France these questions, asked in live proceedings at judicial review and court of appeal stage, under

CPR regulations PART 32 EVIDENCE


Notice to admit facts,,,,

32.18

(1) A party may serve notice on another party requiring him to admit the facts, or the part of the case of the serving party, specified in the notice.,,,,,,,,,,,HOWEVER P0LICE AND COURT JUST IGNORE CORRESPONDENCE ,,,

Why is this important, this is application to remove restraining order, what are issues, we have judiciary stating it was vexatious to make allegations against police, from above police in own words admit claim, we did not follow IPCC regulations and sent reply to appeal where one not lodged,,,not vexatious TRUE. . We have just one outstanding issue with police why did I come to you day1.ISSUE TODAY AS WE ASK POLICE TO CONFIRM WHY DID I COME TO YOU DAY 1. Legaatt LJ states facts of case in Biggers judgement, copy of Cotters judgement. Further evidence back to court of appeal, judiciary state facts of case in Cotters/Biggers judgement, HOWEVER DID COTTER READ APPLICATION OF THE 6.12.2017. THESE ARE NOT FACTS OF CASE AND COTTER READ WRONG PAPERS.COTTER DID NOT READ APPLICATION

Jack basic questions to court.see also evidence in scan evidence 4

a/ Can we please have copy of defaced N244 form, can we please have copy also of N244 form considered by HHJCotter,,,,,chilling remark of female QC barrister and judge who stated will we get can not find file,,,,,,or the N244 missing from file……..Cotter utterly aware of new N244 , email 7.12.2017 ,,,,In application yesterday requested that page one of N244 lodged previously was removed and replaced with document sent to you yesterday. Can you please confirm done. Made via Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS , When state Cotter aware can I qualify. Went to court where talk to manager of PSU [know NOW called support through court] where we talk to courts Mr Hunt. Agreed Hunt would reply in 10days ,,,,,ASK TODAY is this common events ,,,,todays application ,,,court for years ignoring applications and correspondence where Hunt no intention giving reply to questions, as he lied to manager of PSU. Follow up emails ignored, Jack lets ask again. ARE THESE EMAILS IN FILE OR ARE MY RECEIPTS FORGED ????


5.12.2017 timed 16.17 court receipt 16.17

6.12.2017 timed 15.33 15.35 15.45 court receipt same time

7.12.2017 timed 9.58 court receipt 9.59

21.12.2017 timed 11.00 court receipt 11.00.

29.12.2017 timed 4.22 know court had as HHJCotter admits he read as made under Adorisio,,,,,

b/ Simple logic as ask court for nearly 3years ,,,did Cotter read application 6.12.2017 ,,,Cotter did not read application of 6.12.2017 so Legatts judgement in tatters,,eg ,,facts of case in Cotters judgement,??????? HE did not read application,,,. Or did read then utterly aware why i went to police day 1 as you corrupt and frustate the judicial process. Or is defence,,,,we admit we obtained, not read as no fee paid, no fee required ,,Göç v. Turkey / Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS ,

c/ This reduces to simple logic. Have basic question did you obtain application of the 6.12.2017 made under ... Göç v. Turkey / Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS ,

Why do we ask question if answer no can send to you Jack court receipts .Further ask was application read by Cotter. If was not read seek refund of court fee. If was read then of course no application to ombudsman ,however if today confirm was read,,,,then Cotter utterly aware did not go to police day 1 as he states in judgement,,,,,,as solely dissatisfied with judgements of Denyer,, refer to ECHR case law,,,,Obligation incumbent on the administrative authorities: the appellant must have access to the relevant documents in the possession of the administrative authorities, if necessary via a procedure for the disclosure of documents (McGinley and Egan v. the United Kingdom, §§ 86 and 90). Were the respondent State, without good cause, to prevent appellants from gaining access to documents in its possession which would have assisted them in defending their case, or to falsely deny their existence, this would have the effect of denying them a fair hearing, in violation of Article 6 § 1 .....

FURTHER WILL REFER TO ANSWERS ABOVE ARE THESE IN FILE

19/ Today simple question to police why did i come to you day 1, where for 3 years knowing miscarriage of justice refuse to answer question, WE ASK FINAL CHANCE TODAY,,,NO REPLY ASK JACK FOR YOU TO ASK,,,STILL NO REPLY WILL ASK QUESTION INMAGISTRATES COURT AS BEFORE IT THROWING OIL IN POLICE STATION. BEFORE SENT TO PRISON TO DIE Is this a common event of police ignoring complaints can i please refer to scan evidence 6 where seeking replies to complaints of the 1.6.2020 and the 17.10.2020 again ask for reply in 7 days, with no reply ask you Jack to obtain reply.

20/ Have final issue, from above you can see seeking from NBT medical records, please see details in scan appendix 5 where sent medical records of a third party. Asked NBT for sae to return , correspondence ignored. Took up issue with ICO, covered them today again, so informing them and media have third party medical records, where seek instructions

q S


SCAN EVIDENCE 1


SCAN EVIDENCE 4 THE OMBUDSMAN ISSUE REFUND OF COURT FTHIS IS PART EMAIL TO JACK LOPRESTI MP ,,,SHOULD BE CONSIDERED WITH FULL EMAIL THE REST OF EMAIL CAN BE FOUND IN WWW.CORRUPTIONINBRISTOLCOUNTYCOURT.COM. SPECIFIC ELEMENT SCAN EVIDENCE 1 ONLY SENT TO THE P0LICE TODAY ……THEIR SOLE ISSUE


THE WHOLE ISSUE AT END OF DOCUMENT UNDER CONCLUSION


ENCLOSED ALSO TO POLICE SCAN EVIDENCE 6 TO LOOK AT THEIR BEHAVIOIR ,,,,MADE UNDER ,,,..Mirojuhys v Latvia …………………fairness of proceedings always assessed by examining them in entirety that an isolated incident may not be sufficient to conclude proceedings as a whole unfair…. ,,,,,,isolated incident,,????consider complaint 1.6.2020 ,17.10.2020 please see details in scan evidence 6 ,,, where after 6 months police ignore complaint ,,,,ECT IGNORE AS TODAYS ISSUE


COPY ALSO SENT TO PCC Ms MOUNTSTEVENS AS PUT ON NOTICE REQUEST TO HER TO ENSURE JACK [LOPRESTI MP] HAVE REPLY IN 7 DAYS COPY TO ME VIA EMAIL .WITH NO REPLY AS WE EXPECT ASK JACK TO CONTACT TO OBTAIN EVIDENCE AS YOU CONTINUE TO CORRUPT AND FRUSTRATE THE JUDICIAL PROCESS WITH MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE.


THE ISSUES TO POLICE


a/ Why did i come to you day 1 when barrister told me to make complaint when seen by Sgt Price

b/ Can we please have replies to complaints, where as in a/ the police attitude,,,,if we ignore correspondence he will go away, as of 1.6.2020 and 17.10.2020

c/ Can they confirm for media as in Ebrahimi case that in criminal /antisocial behaviour if you make complaint we will ignore.




ISSUE MAIN,,,,ARISES FROM CO/1731/2018 WHERE MASTER [level of judge] GIVES PERMISSION TO MAKE APPLICATION BACK TO THE COURT. NEED TO EXPLAIN TO MEDIA POLICE ARE DEFENDANTS AND COURTS [HMCS ] JUST A INTERESTED PARTY. THE COURTS AS SUCH LIKE RATS IN A SEWER SOMETIME AGO,SAY ,,,DO NOT REALLY WANT TO BE INVOLVED IN THIS ,,,,, COURT ASKED US IF WE WANT TO COMMENT ON EVIDENCE ,,,NO THIS IS ISSUE BETWEEN YOU AND POLICE….DO NOT AGREE ,,,,,,,,THE POLICE ALSO AT ALL STAGES MADE NO COMMENT TO THE COURT,,,,WHAT ARE ISSUES

POLICE [judiciary state A/ B/ vexatious however police in own words admit allegations, their correspondence before judiciary, this is identical as in Profuma affair, great interest of mine,,,,COLLUSION BETWEEN POLICE AND JUDICIARY]],

A/ THIS WAS A IPCC INVESTIGATION WHERE POLICE DID NOT FOLLOW IPCC REGULATIONS IN THIS SCAN EVIDENCE 1 INSP O MAHONY ADMITS WE DID NOT FOLLOW IPCC REGULATIONS

B/ IN EVIDENCE ,,,SCAN EVIDENCE 1 POLICE FURTHER ADMIT WE SENT REPLY TO YOUR APPEAL WHEN NO APPEAL LODGED. POLICE CORRESPONDENCE BEFORE 22.7.2017 STATES IF DOING AN APPEAL WE REQUIRE OUR OFFICIAL APPEAL FORM NO APPEAL FORM SENT TO 7.8.2017 WHERE POLICE/PCC MOUNTSTEVENS STATE WE WILL IGNORE APPEAL,,,,eg YOU HAVE NO EVIDENCE FOR YEARS BACK TO 2010 MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE THE COURTS IGNORING APPLICATIONS AND CORRESPONDENCE WHERE POLICE AND JUDICIARY HAVE COURT LETTER,,,,,WE IGNORED YOUR APPLICATIONS COME AND TALK TO US,,,

C/ THE ONLY OUTSTANDING ISSUE WHY I WENT TO POLICE DAY 1 ..[THEY ARE UTTERLY AWARE A MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE SO IGNORE REQUEST,,,,THIS REQUEST WAS MADE IN LIVE PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE Admin court and court of appeal, under,, CPR regulations PART 32 EVIDENCE

Notice to admit facts,,,,,why I came to you day 1

32.18

(1) A party may serve notice on another party requiring him to admit the facts, or the part of the case of the serving party, specified in the notice.,,,,,,,,,,,

which POLICE in questions ignored… ,IS THIS COMMON EVENT.....Mirojuhys v Latvia …………………fairness of proceedings always assessed by examining them in entirety that an isolated incident may not be sufficient to conclude proceedings as a whole unfair…. ,,,,,,isolated incident,,????consider complaint 1.6.2020 , 17.10.2020 please see details scan evidence 6 where after 6 months police ignore complaint

COURT [THE OMBUDSMAN SOLE ISSUE PLEASE SEE SCAN EVIDENCE 4]

A/ HHJCOTTER DID NOT READ APPLICATION OF THE 6.12.2917 ADMITTED BY JUDICIARY SEEK REFUND OF FEE

Jack sole issue that you have been involved with for years, NOW before ombudsman, refund of court fee as application of 6.12.2017 not read by HHJCotter.Simple question they refuse to answer in papers WAS APPLICATION 6.12.2017 READ BY HHJCOTTER I ASKED COURT ???????????

Jack must be first time do not know HMCS defense to ombudsman issue YOU DO NOT KNOW SO CAN NOT REFER UNTIL YOU KNOW COURTS STANCE. HAVE ASKED SAME QUESTIONS IN LIVE PROCEEDINGS AT JUDICIAL REVIEW AND COURT OF APPEAL STAGE TO COURTS ,,,UNDER

CPR regulations PART 32 EVIDENCE

Notice to admit facts

32.18

(1) A party may serve notice on another party requiring him to admit the facts, or the part of the case of the serving party, specified in the notice.,,,,,,,,,,,

which COURT in their questions ignored…Lets ask again with reply to you Jack in 7 days,with no reply Jack ask you to ask them. Coming to end of my life, these questions if need be answered in magistrates court, collecting 5L cans of old oil to throw in police station doorway before sent to prison to die,,,,severe heart condtion., simple surgery rejected Stress of arrest best result to expose corruption if die in police custody. Accept problem can I refer to your HISTORIC Mr Cobbs letter,,,,will write again to Bristol county court, Jack can not force them to reply. Further when ISSUE was in proceedings,POLICE in ,utter breach of Article 6 ignore correspondence

The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,,,,,,,,,

QUESTIONS

1/ WHY DID I COME TO YOU DAY 1 DO YOU HAVE ANY EVIDENCE I CAME AS SOLELY DISSATISFIED WITH JUDGEMENTS OF HHJDENYER IFYOU HAVE CAN YOU DISCLOSE TO JACK


SYNOPSIS

Have permission from Master [level of judge at court of appeal ] to make an application back to the court.

TODAY UNDER ECHR CASE LAW SEEK REPLY IN 7 DAYS FROM POLICE TO MY MP JACK LOPRESTI WITH COPY TO ME.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, FROM ECHR,,,

The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,]VERY SIMPLE QUESTION THE POLICE ELEMENT WHY DID I COME TO YOU DAY 1 SIMPLE QUESTION WAS IT MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE AS COURTS IGNORING APPLICATIONS AND CORRESPONDENCE FOR YEARS BACK TO 2010 ,AS JCIO STATE VIA STATUTE AS CRIMINAL OFFENCE WE COULD NEVER INVESTIGATE. OR WAS IT MALFREASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE AS SOLELY OVER THE YEARS I WAS ,,,,DISSATISFIED WITH JUDGEMENTS OF HHJDENYER. IF YOU HAVE EVIDENCE IT WAS DISSATISFIED WITH JUDGEMENTS OF HHJDENYER OVER YEARS COULD YOU PLEASE SUPPLY EVIDENCE TO MY MP JACK LOPRESTI ,IN 7 DAYS WITH EMAIL COPY TO ME,,,HAVE ASKED POLICE BEFORE WHILE IN PROCEEDINGS under


CPR 32 Notice to admit facts

32.18

(1) A party may serve notice on another party requiring him to admit the facts, or the part of the case of the serving party, specified in the notice.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

WHERE THEY IGNORED CORRESPONDENCE WHILE IN PROCEEDINGS ASK RECENTLY WHERE DEMAND MONEY TO ANSWER QUESTION, FINAL ELEMENT OF CASE REQUIRED THEN BACK TO COURT OF APPEAL. HAVE REMAINDING EVIDENCE IN POLICE OWN WORDS

FACTS

JUDICIARY ALLEDGE IT WAS VEXATIOUS TO MAKE ALLEGATIONS AGAINST POLICE, HOWEVER BECAUSE MADE RESTRAINING ORDER ISSUED, WHAT WERE ALLEGATIONS IN JUDICIAL REVIEW APPLICATION eg LETS QUOTE ACTUAL APLICATION




The Queen on the application of PHILIP JONES

Versus ,,,,CHIEF CONSTABLE AVON AND SOMERSET POLICE

SYNOPSIS ,,,SOLE ISSUE WHAT WE ARE ASKING CAN DEFENDANTS IGNORE STATUTORY IPCC REGULATIONS ON INVESTIGATION [grounds 1 in judicial review application page 4] AND WHEN AGAIN IN STATUTORY REGULATIONS I CAN APPPEAL,[grounds 2 in judicial application page 4/5] ,,,,SEND REPLY TO AN APPEAL I HAVE NOT LODGED. AS ONE LAWYER STATED WHERE ARE WE CHINA/RUSSIA.[IPCC state police inform us you lodged an appeal, only route a judicial review you will see in police letter they state you emailed us on the 22.7.2017 asking questions to do appeal,you stated WITH NO REPLY BY 28.7.2017 YOU WOULD ASSUME QUESTIONS WOULD NOT BE ANSWERED AND WOULD DO APPEAL ON/AFTER 28.7.2017. IN REPLY TO THAT EMAIL ,,,,24.7.2017 DEFENDANTS ALLEDGE THAT EMAIL 22.7.2017 WAS THE APPEAL]WHERE ARE WE CHINA/RUSSIA[end of quote judicial reriew]



JUDICIARY DEFINITION OF JUDICIAL REVIEW. It is not really concerned with the conclusions of that process and whether those were ‘right’, as long as the right procedures have been followed. The court will not substitute what it thinks is the ‘correct’ decision.Simple question were right procedures followed,


Can I refer as cited this further also was in judicial review application /pre action protocol document for judicial review [2017] ,,,, from local judge and barrister paper on malfeasance[misconduct ]in public office],


The elements [for offence] which can be extracted from the limited case law are: A public officer ,,,,,, Wilfully neglecting to perform her duty or wilfully misconducting herself ,,,,,,, To such a degree as to amount to an abuse of the public’s trust in the office holder ,,,,,, Without reasonable justification or excuse. Despite the criticism, there remains an appetite, at the Law Commission at least, to preserve an offence of misconduct in public office, or create a codified replacement. This appetite comes at least in part from recognition that the offence, at times, is the best description of the criminality involved: the public outrage comes not from the particular details of the misconduct, but from the sense of being wronged by an individual whose duty is to serve the public interest. . Kate Brunner QC

Have i been wronged by police ,,,correlate with actual judicial review application, in a IPCC investigation admit we did not follow IPCC ,regulations ,we never talked to you, admitted in scan 10594 and sent a reply to an appeal where admit one not lodged scan 10475 10494,,,eg we obtained your email 22.7.2017 where it stated with no answer to questions,to obtain evidence to do THE appeal you would do appeal on/after the 28.7.2017 EMAIL 22.7.2017 CAN NOT BE AN APPEAL AS POLICE MAINTAIN IN REPLY OF 24.7.2017


EVIDENCE BELOW WHERE POLICE IN OWN WORDS ADMIT APPLICATION THEY ADMIT WE DID NOT FOLLOW IPCC REGULATIONS AND SENT REPLY TO APPEAL WHERE ONE NOT MADE

This evidence below before judiciary, denying evidence before it, utter breach of Article 6 denying evidence before it,,,,,eg

Obligation incumbent on the administrative authorities: the appellant must have access to the relevant documents in the possession of the administrative authorities, if necessary via a procedure for the disclosure of documents (McGinley and Egan v. the United Kingdom, §§ 86 and 90). Were the respondent State, without good cause, to prevent appellants from gaining access to documents in its possession which would have assisted them in defending their case, or to falsely deny their existence, this would have the effect of denying them a fair hearing, in violation of Article 6 § 1 .....

WHAT ARE REGUATIONS OF IPCC IN THEIR INVESTIGATION

Regulations IPCC [independent police complaint commission] in a police investigation.,,,,sent to me ALSO CITED ON INTERNET

Contact to make sure have all details

Ask what you want to happen

Inform you what is likely to happen

Talk to you about way they will deal with your complaint

Let you know the outcome when they have finished , do in person or on phone ,BUT should also write to you

PLEASE SEE INSP O MAHONYS LETTER SCAN 10594 WHERE ADMIT POLICE NEVER TALKED TO ME eg DID NOT FOLLOW 1PCC REGULATIONS

LETS LOOK AT OTHER ALLEGATION IN JUDICIAL REVIEW APPLICATION,

Many years ago courts ignoring applications, and correspondence, had call one evening,,,,,well spoken male ,,,I do not approve of a one of your old applications to MY court,,,,[a district judge ?????] however will not stand by where corruption is going on HHJDenyer, and court out to get you, they have made a mistake, they have removed applications, however one in new case still on system in PRESENT case,,,,,,[8 years ago]. Visit court talk to Mr Blair,,,,recorded,,,all I state just checking to see applications in file,,,,,from recording ask nothing else,,,live case,,,we get reply,,,,nothing to do with me I check your applications, make sure you have evidence of being fee except,ect, and put in tray behind me,,,,,no one making allegations ,,,,is he responsible for removal of applications???. Is this not identical to Watergate,,,where Woodward/Bernsteine at Washington Post in deductions state we never asked about this, .....did not make any allegations the courts removing applications.However we know even later OBS80441 that applications, date/stamped by the court missing from file,,,,as at hearing a case I won, DJWatson states something very very odd here.

Courts for years ignoring applications and correspondence, pickit at court ,please see scan picket, barrister advised contacting police malfeasance in public office ignoring applications for many years, . WE HAVE CORRESPONDENCE FROM THE COURT WE IGNORED YOUR APPLICATIONS COME AND TALK TO US AND CITED LAWYER CORRESPONDENCE WHOSE ALSO CORRESPONDENCE WAS IGNORED , had document applications date/stamped by court ignored ect ect . Police state you have no evidence of malfeasance in public office,courts ignoring applications/correspondence,for years, from above evidence comes under Wednesbury unreasonableness,,,THEY HAVE COURT SAYING WE IGNORED YOUR APPLICATIONS. We have email from Mr Fowler [Bristol county court] in respect to statute CPR Part 32 Notice to Admit Facts ,,,,where he states your correspondence will not be read, not answered just filed, utter breach of Article 6,,,,,also

The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,]

From above nonsense stated to police in email 22.7.2017 you have come to judgement in IPCC investigation, , and have not followed IPCC regulations, when do you alledge you talked to me, asked further 11 questions eg ,,,have you talked to lawyer from above,,,,stating with no reply by the 28.7.2017 would assume there would be no reply and would then do appeal on/after the 28.7.2017. We then get police letter dated 24.7.2017 saying reply to your appeal I have made no appeal, waiting for reply to questions, the above history not in dispute can I refer to police letter scan 10475/10494,,,police admit,,,

eg,,You then emailed in reply 22.7.2017 and accused,,,,,,, of sweeping under the carpet…..You also said will assume with no email reply by 9.00 am 28.7.2017 there would be no reply and can do appeal to you.

SO SAYING POLICE DID NOT FOLLOW IN A IPCC INVESTIGATION IPCC REGULATIONS AND SENT REPLY TO AN APPEAL WHERE I HAVE NOT LODGED ONE ,,,,THE JUDICIARY STATE MY CLAIM VEXATIOUS,,,,THEREFORE ISSUE RESTRAINING ORDER WHERE BEFORE IT HAS ABOVE EVIDENCE WHERE POLICE ADMIT ALLEGATIONS WHERE ARE WE RUSSIA/CHINA,,,or is this like Profuma case collusion between police and judiciary.MY STATEMENTS TRUE ADMITTED BY POLICE,,lets consider a Crown court judge who saw my website,,,,stated not making any allegations however people in media may ask is this judiciary protecting their own

LETS CONSIDER WHY I WENT TO POLICE DAY 1

THE EVIDENCE



Can i refer to another female judge and barrister who saw my website www.corruptioninbristolcountycourt.com who stated in general there is cornerstone issue in case. Stated take theoretical example i sit as judge, defendant seen leaving bank after robbery, however case fails as defendant in closed prison on this date, your case why you went to police day 1. May seem strange however have sympathy with police, courts for years ignoring applications and correspondence, picket at court ,where barrister advises who i gave leaflet to, scanpicket to report to police malfeasance in public office courts ignoring applications for years and correspondence. Seen by Sgt Price where asked to paste CPS document on malfeasance in public office, and insert in it my complaint, the FEDJCAB complete document. Given by her then to PCBird, who contacts Bristol county court, where told not issue for police, only route a complaint to JCIO [judicial conduct investigation office]

This is where we have problem, under

The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,]

And in proceedings at all stages, eg HHJCotter/Admin court Cardiff/Court of appeal while in live proceedings parties as they frustrate and corrupt the judicial process just ignore all correspondence [police and HMCS]

CPR regulations PART 32 EVIDENCE

Notice to admit facts

32.18

(1) A party may serve notice on another party requiring him to admit the facts, or the part of the case of the serving party, specified in the notice.,,,,,,,,,,,


What did I ask, who at Bristol county court told PCBird to complain to JCIO. Playing Devils Advocate will we get it was HHJDenyers clerk,,,,where he will state,,,,remember getting call,,,,PCBird stated did not give me full allegations, only said Mr Jones was unhappy with conduct of Denyer,,,,I therefore informed PCBird therefore to complain to JCIO. WHAT DID PCBIRD INFORM THE COURT,,,,,WHO DID HE TALK TO. POLICE IGNORE UNDER CPR 32,,,,,WE DO NOT KNOW ANSWERS IS PCBIRD GOING TO SAY,,,,I TALKED TO X AT THE COURT EXPLAINED I HAD A COMPLAINT OF MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE YOU IGNORING APPLICATIONS FOR YEARS,,, WHERE TOLD NOTHING TO DO WITH COURT,,,,COMPLAIN TO JCIO. HOWEVER IF X AT COURT AWARE MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE AWARE CRIMINAL OFFENCE,,,THEN AWARE VIA STATUTE AS CRIMINAL OFFENCE COULD NOT COMPLAIN TO JCIO. LETS TAKE JUDICIARY STANCE FURTHER YOU WENT AS DISSATISFIED WITH SOLELY OVER JUDGEMENTS OF DENYER. AS FEMALE JUDGE AND BARRISTER STATED IN JUDGEMENT HHJCOTTER STATES,,,,,CRIMINAL OFFENCE,,,AND JUDICIARY STANCE,,, POLICE CORRECT TO ADVISE TO CONTACT JCIO. HOWEVER COTTER AWARE AS CRIMINAL OFFENCE COULD NOT REFER TO JCIO STATING YOU WENT AS ,,,,DISSATISFIED WITH JUDGEMENTS OF DENYER. IF THIS IS CASE POLICE WERE WRONG,,,AS FEMALE BARRISTER STATED,,,,IF YOU WENT AS DISSATISFIED WITH JUDGEMENTS OVER THE YEARS OF DENYER,,,,JCIO CAN DO NOTHING ABOUT THIS,,,AS STATUTE ONLY ROUTE TO APPEAL THESE JUDGEMENTS. FURTHER IF TRUE,,,AS FEMALE BARRISTER STATED,,,,YOU SHOULD HAVE BEEN SHOWN DOOR,,,,THIS WAS NOT EVEN CRIMINAL JUDGEMENTS THEY WERE CIVIL CASES,,,,POLICE CAN DO NOTHING ABOUT COURT JUDGEMENTS. FURTHER AS BARRISTER STATED WHY IS SGT PRICE WASTING POLICE TIME ASKING PCBIRD TO INVESTIGATE ALLEGATIONS ,,,,,,,I WAS UNHAPPY WITH VARIOUS CIVIL COURT JUDGEMENTS,,,AS SHE SAID SHOULD HAVE BEEN TOLD WE CAN DO NOTHING,,,,YOU NEED TO APPEAL BACK TO THE CIVIL COURT.




Was it malfeasance in public office as courts for years ignoring applications and correspondence ,a criminal offence, and via statute as they confirm JCIO we could never investigate complaint, as criminal offence, ,,,,judiciary state should have complained to JCIO. ?????? OR WENT TO POLICE AS SOLELY ......DISSATISFIED WITH PREVIOUS NUMEROUS JUDGEMENTS OF HHJDENYER,,,nonsence ????????????????

A STORY MADE UP BY HHJCOTTER TO CORRUPT AND FRUSTRATE THE JUDICIAL PROCESS ???????????? ask police today who did PCBird talk to ??




a/ Court for years ignoring applications and correspondence , picket at court SCAN picket, where barrister advised contacting defendants, criminal offence malfeasance in public office, record conversation with Sgt Price where agreed to send CPS document on malfeasance in public office and insert my complaint in terms of this CPS document. Defined the FEDJCAB complete document,[ Fatal Evidence Document Judiciary Corrupt And Bent.] eg



CPS in black DIRECT PASTE from their document , my comments were in red to Sgt Price ,eg why I went to police,,, this is subsection of FEDJCAB complete, defined just FEDJCAB eg,,,,, why I went to police

SCOPE OF OFFENCE,,,Misconduct in public office is an offence at common law ,,,,,,,office confined to those that are public office holders and is commited when the office holder acts or fails to act in a way that constitutes a breach of the duties of that office. ,,,,,,,he is judge HHJDenyer that deals with appeals, there is no doubt he failed to act when appeals/appication are sent to him to pervert the course of justice.[CAN I ADD SEE APPENDIX 2,,,,,used today same document title Appendix 2 for reference] DEFINITION OF OFFENCE wilfully neglects to perform his duty and/or wilfully misconduct himself ,,,,,,,,,he failed to perform his duty by ignoring my applications PUBLIC OFFICER ,,,,judges defined as officer,,,,,

ASKED DEFENDANTS WHILE IN LIVE PROCEEDINGS , TO CONFIRM ABOVE DOCUMENT WAS ONE SENT TO THEM eg WHY I WENT TO THEM,,,,UNDER,,

CPR 32 Notice to admit facts

32.18

(1) A party may serve notice on another party requiring him to admit the facts, or the part of the case of the serving party, specified in the notice.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,CORRESPONDENCE IGNORED ,,,

RECENTLY ASK AGAIN ,WAS THIS THE DOCUMENT SENT AS REQUESTED BY SGT PRICE WHERE DEFENDANTS DEMAND MONEY TO ANSWER QUESTION.


b/ Letter delivered by hand, Patchway police station,,,, receipt, please see scan 13.4.2017 eg what did i say,,,


,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

You have been supplied with CPS document on malfeasance in public office , where you asked to explain how it relates to my complaint. If you need more information please contact me, When picketing at court, as you know barrister told me to report to you malfeasance in public office, ignoring applications over many YEARS , as you stated would not be given to anyone to investigate if not a criminal offence, lawyer informs me a legal name its ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,misconduct in public office , where he informs me your officers jailed recently over this criminal offence , ,plus above perjury issue.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,


ASKED DEFENDANTS AGAIN IN LIVE PROCEEDINGS PLUS RECENTLY AS ABOVE WAS THIS THE DOCUMENT LETTER SENT AS REQUESTED BY SGT PRICE WHERE AS ABOVE DEFENDANTS DEMAND MONEY TO ANSWER QUESTION.




c/ The FEDJCAB in pre action protocol document for judicial review, served on parties on the 16.9.2017 . Further the pre action protocol document had to be produced via statute set paragraphs please see scan annexA for regulations eg paragraph 7 defined in Annex A scan the issue,,, NEED TO INFORM COURT OF ISSUE,,,what did I state…

paragraph 7/ THE ISSUE [from preaction protocol document]

BCC [Bristol county court ] for years ignoring applications, criminal offence malfeasance in public office, .resulting in one incident of miscarriage of justice. Complaint to defendants [POLICE] who refuse to investigate.

d/,,,,From pre action protocol statute document, give warning to HHJCotter,,,,,….eg


If practice of ignoring applications continues then next step, European court ECHR


StranGreek v Greece …………..a right to present which they regard as relevant .The right can only be seen to be effective if the observations are actually heard, that is to say considered by the court , have a duty to conduct a proper examination of arguments/evidence adducted by the parties,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Principle whereby a civil claim be capable of being submitted to a judge ranks as one of the universally recognised principles of law……………[FOR YEARS IGNORING APPLICATIONS] UNQUOTE


Above in email cited in MY note to Cotter 17.11.2017 via email, there were no emails to court, 14.11.2017 .In Cotters judgement states email 14.11.2017 where asking for nearly 3 years ,,,,is this cited email of 17.11.2017 ……………[FOR YEARS IGNORING APPLICATIONS],WHY I WENT TO POLICE,,,,where HMCS just ignore correspondence utter breach of Article 6. ....


The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,] and CPR 32,,,

They ignore as clear to Cotter why i went to police, day 1, and know Cotter read as quoted in his judgement. How does this bent judge go from,,,,[FOR YEARS IGNORING APPLICATIONS]........to DISSATISFIED WITH JUDGEMENTS OF HHJDENYER ???????????????????

e/ From ,,,, Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,,

ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS , ,,my court email of 21.12.2017

APPEAL AGAINST MR KROUWEL LETTER OF 5.12.2017



SKELETAL ARGUMENT


1/ Picketing at Bristol county court barrister told me to make complaint to police, malfeasance in public office, plus AGAIN perjury issue, warned police may try to brush you off.


2/ Clearly being brushed off by Sgt Price,, visit recorded,,,,,,,,,,,,,civil issues, make complaint to court, where I inform her I could not make a complaint.;;;;;;[CRIMINAL OFFENCE JCIO CAN NOT INVESTIGATE] tpld malfeasance not a criminal offence.stated on tape ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Where I state are you saying you refuse to investigate, where Sgt Price backs down, requests documents sent to her, eg CPS document, ,,,,,,,criminal offence, judges/police/courts convicted. [recently own police convicted Ibramahimi case]


3/Get reply from PCBird, ,,,,,I am investigating your allegations of malfeasance in public office, make complaint to HMCS, from 2/ aware I could not make a complaint. Accept i have been betrayed by Sgt Price, as wished to sweep under carpet as warned by barrister. .


4/ So complain to police, get reply from Mr Galloway,,,,,,advice was correct to complain to HMCS. Further states no evidence of malfeasance in public office, confirmed also by our third party.


5/ Statutory route to appeal. Asking police questions for appeal,,,,,,,,,,,,,,ISSUE NO EVIDENCE OF MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE. For example Galloway accepts in his letter ,,,, court order to make application ,,,,,, applications made to the court that were ignored, emailed on regular basis for reply to applications which court ignored, back to 2013, , I give evidence for example lawyers /MP also tried to get a reply to applications, which were ignored. Recording with court staff, admit applications made, which were ignored by the court. Have email from police saying if doing appeal need to enclose also our appeal claim form. Further asking police why statutory regulations of IPCC not followed in investigations, reference leaflet sent to me.


6/ On the 22.7.2017 send email as police ignoring request for data, can I quote end of that email,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,will assume with no email reply [to questions] by 9.00 am 28.7.2017 there will be no reply and can do appeal to you.h,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,


....

7/

77

Can I refer to female judge and barrister STATES ,,,,,HHJCotter was never going to grant your aplication,,,,turkeys voting for Xmas, inviting police in to investigate criminal behaviour,,,,,Cotter states you went to police as dissatisfied WITH JUDGEMENTS OF HHJDENYER, FROM ABOVE HOW DOES HE COME TO THIS JUDGEMENT,,,CORRUPT AND BENT MAKES UP STORY. AS RETIRED DISTRICT JUDGE STATED NOT JUDICIAL LANGUAGE HOWEVER CALLING THEM BASTARDS

There is at Bristol county court a [PSU] unit now know as Support Through Court ,[STC] visit with Ms Sell where manager at STC takes up issues with courts Mr Hunt. Agreed that Hunt he would confirm ,documents lodged with court, and therefore read by Cotter.[have copied STC into todays email if they want to comment to you Jack] ,so would know read by Cotter and considered,,, ,,,,,from Case Law ,,,Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,,

ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS , ,,,Hunt although promised to STC manager he would confirm, request ignored, take up issue with court manager Ms Pawsey,,,where we get IDENTICAL REPLY as one made by Fowler years ago,,,,your correspondence will not be read, not answered just filed,,,,utter breach as before of Article 6,The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],




f/ CAN I PLEASE CITE JUDICIAL REVIEW APPLICATION MARCH 2018

The issue with police ,,,,,,perjury issue [Eaga case] and court staff /judges ignoring applications, and correspondence, ignored,,,, McGinley v UK,,,,,,breach withholding documents which would have assisted with case...Ruiz-Mateus v Spain ,,,,,to have knowledge of and comment on all evidence adducted or observations filed... resulting in miscarriage of justice, perverting course of justice, In 2YJ03757 we know application made for oral hearing , from recording with Mr Blair at Bristol court office Mr Till sent to the Administration court Cardiff, he has court order to send to HHJDenyer did he ignore order, malfeasance in public office, or did he send to HHJDenyer who ignored, did Administration court obtain, we suggested to police could they get local police to obtain file, ,,,,we know lawyer could not get a oral hearing, we asked police,,,,,have you talked to lawyer, ,,,,have you talked to Pro Bono Unit, ,,,,,,please see details in text. .Are these chronic events, Mirojuhys v Latvia …………………fairness of proceedings always assessed by examining them in entirety [malfeasance in public office] that an isolated incident may not be sufficient to conclude proceedings as a whole unfair…. ,,,,,,consider even 2018 issues, where even today applications ignored……UNQUOTE


WE HAVE BENT AND CORRUPT HHJBIGGER COMING TO IDENTICAL WRONG JUDGEMENT as COTTERS.

Again as judge stated ,,,Bigger was never going to grant application turkeys voting for Xmas, inviting police in to investigate his courts criminal behaviour.

The application in judicial review was made to Admin court Birmingham , as for years Cardiff ignoring applications/correspondence also, made under Application Practice Directives 54d.5.2 ,. From Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,,

ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS , ,,the FEDJCAB complete document , the recording with Sgt Price , the pre action protocol for judicial review document sent to Birmingham court, no doubt why I went day 1 to police. I have asked under CPR directive 32.18 Notice to Admit Facts, NOW LIVE THEN IN ADMIN COURT ,,,Birmingham court , we have proof of posting sent, did you get,,,did you forward to Cardiff,,,,asked Cardiff court what documents were forwarded to your court from Birmingham, where both courts ignore correspondence, again utter breach of Article 6,The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,

A barrister who saw my website cited application in judicial review,,,,,,from above

Are these chronic events, Mirojuhys v Latvia …………………fairness of proceedings always assessed by examining them in entirety [malfeasance in public office] that an isolated incident may not be sufficient to conclude proceedings as a whole unfair…. ,,,,,,consider even 2018 issues, where even today applications ignored.

VERY CLEAR WHAT ISSUE IS WHAT DID I SAY IN JUDICIAL REVIEW APPLICATION,,,,,consider even 2018 issues, where even today applications ignored.,,,,,CONSIDER COTTERS JUDGEMENT ,,,,YOU WENT TO POLICE AS DISSATISFIED WITH JUDGEMENTS OF DENYER,,,,,HOWEVER AS BARRISTER SAID DENYER RETIRED IN 2017 SO ISSUE CAN NOT BE ,,,DISSATISFIED WITH JUDGEMENTS OF DENYER IN 2018 AS ISSUE STILL GOING ON IN 2018 CAN BE NOTHING TO DO WITH DENYERS JUDGEMENT HE WAS NOT AT COURT IN 2018. RETIRED

g/ Considers Biggers judgement , copy of Cotters judgement.

We already have police from above in own words admitting in this IPCC investigation we did not follow IPCC regulations, and sent reply to an appeal,,,,,you have no evidence of malfeasance in public office the courts for years ignoring applications/correspondence ,,,where we have court stating,,,,we ignored your applications come and talk to us. . We have one outstanding issue,,,,,why I went to police day 1,,,,

WILL USE SEVERAL TIMES CAN WE DEFINE TERM OETICARF ,,Overwhelming Evidence Tactically Ignore Correspondence As Reply Fatal

We have case where police are defendants and civil courts are interested party, police can not answer question,,,,,why did I come to you on day 1 , and court can not answer question ,,,,did HHJCotter read revised application of 6.12.2017 , made under Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS ,

As I state police can not reply , look at judgement of Bigger, IDENTICAL copy of Cotters judgement went to police malfeasance in public office as courts for many years ignoring applications and correspondence.FROM ABOVE DID NOT GO AS DISSATISFIED WITH JUDGEMENTS OF DENYER From judicial review application seek evidence to do judicial review application,,

This evidence above before judiciary, eg FEDJCAB document, denying evidence before it, utter breach of Article 6 denying evidence before it,,,,why I went to police day1 ,eg

Obligation incumbent on the administrative authorities: the appellant must have access to the relevant documents in the possession of the administrative authorities, if necessary via a procedure for the disclosure of documents (McGinley and Egan v. the United Kingdom, §§ 86 and 90). Were the respondent State, without good cause, to prevent appellants from gaining access to documents in its possession which would have assisted them in defending their case, or to falsely deny their existence, this would have the effect of denying them a fair hearing, in violation of Article 6 § 1 .....

COTTER/BIGGER DENYING EVIDENCE BEFORE THEM.

Visit court 5.12.2017 Mr Blair states your not looking at files, showing us ignoring your applications, make application to Cotter who will also ignore application . Could not do judicial review application as evidence withheld, ,LOOK AT JUDICIAL REVIEW APPLICATION IGNORING APPLICATIONS FOR YEARS STILL GOING ON IN 2018 BY COTTER. , where Jack I contacted your office, copy to Cotter, where he now replies scancotterlate, utterly aware out of time to do judicial review application HOWEVER withheld evidence,,,, The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],

We ask police series of questions where they demand money to answer, so comprimise,,,,,,why did I come to you day 1,,,,,do you have any evidence I came solely as dissatisfied with judgements of Denyer, if you do please supply. We ask police again simple question, could you copy Jack into reply in 7 days. PCC Ms Mountstevens copied today,,,,we have miscarriage of justice we ask you [PCC] to ensure police answer question. With no reply in 7 days I ask you Jack to ask police,before taking matter into my own hands.

FURTHER CONSIDERATION WITH POLICE

1/ When in a difficult position just ignore applications eg complaint 1.6.2020 after nearly 6 months no reply , complaint 17.10.2020 also ignored, and further details in scan evidence 6

CONCLUSION

1/ I am asking State to provide Legal Aid, to remove restraining order, from statute from day 1 of order, have to inform police and courts if they have any objections to removal of COURT OF APPEAL order, where non issued,no objection , if they have now Jack ask them in 7 days to inform you Jack. SO ASKING FOR REMOVAL WHERE PARTIES HAVE NO OBJECTION TO REMOVAL.The police and PCC Ms Mountstevens have duty of care to ensure that money is not wasted. If you have evidence in 7 days to oppose application back to the court, inform Jack and me in 7 days please. At all stages Cotter/Admin court/court of appeal,,,police via statute had chance to DISPUTE FACTS OF my application,,,eg acknowledgement of service and todays application to remove restraining order,,,at court of appeal where police made no objection. As female barrister/judge stated if they did Legatt LJ in mood he was in would have awarded costs against you, AS TIME SPENT Can I refer to Leggatt LJ judgement , and correspondence to police to inform me if they objected to application back to the court,,,,todays issue . There was no objection,,,however accept today Jack police/Mountstevens may raise objections, of return to the court, where ask them to inform you in 7 days, with copy of email to me please, why they object to application, need to show EVEN POLICE DO NOT OBJECT TO TODAYS APPLICATION. WHERE SEEK LEGAL AID

2/ What was judgement,,,,,,I went to police day 1 as SOLELY ,,,,,malfeasance in public office as dissatisfied with judgements of Denyer,,,,is this correct,,,WE ASK POLICE,,,if so can you please supply evidence to Jack, Talked to female barrister and judge,,,compelling evidence above, plus as Insp O Mahony states you did not know if criminal offence malfeasance in public office ignoring applications for years, by court staff not sending applications to Denyer, or Denyer just ignoring. As judge stated court staff have nothing to do with,,,judgements of Denyer,,,so court issue can not be you went day 1 as dissatisfied with judgements of Denyer, judgements of Denyer nothing to do with court staff.

3/ SIMPLE QUESTION WE HAVE RESTRAINING ORDER AS ALLEGATIONS VEXATIOUS AGAINST POLICE WHERE POLICE IN OWN WORDS ADMIT ALLEGATIONS,,,,SHOWS CORRUPTION PLUS UTTER BREACH OF ECHR CASE LAW,,,,BY COTTER/BIGGER/LEGATT,,,,,,,,,,,,, eg ,,,,or to falsely deny their existence, this would have the effect of denying them a fair hearing, in violation of Article 6 § 1 .....THEY HAVE POLICE ADMITTING IN OWN WORDS,,,,AS JUDGE SAID IS THIS JUDICIARY [LEGATT] PROTECTING THEIR OWN. JUST ONE OUTSTANDING QUESTION,,,,YES JUST ONE ASKING FOR YEARS EVEN IN LIVE PROCEEDINGS UNDER

CPR 32 Notice to admit facts

32.18

(1) A party may serve notice on another party requiring him to admit the facts, or the part of the case of the serving party, specified in the notice.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,CORRESPONDENCE IGNORED ,,

,DID I COME TO YOU DAY 1 COMPELLING EVIDENCE ABOVE MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE AS FOR YEARS THE COURTS IGNORING APPLICATIONS AND CORRESPONDENCE .;;;;or was itsolely as ,,,,dissatisfied with judgements of Denyer.As female barrister/judge stated,,,,you have asked police was the FEDJCAB document sent to police,,,,was this in the pre action protocol document for judicial review,,,,shows why you went day 1,,,,,police may say, as judge said i work on facts,,,not documents he sent,,,he sent,,,,police can answer if they want, not asking today,,,,, JUST ONE QUESTION WAS IT MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE IGNORING CORRESPONDENCE AND APPLICATIONS FOR YEARS,,,AND THEREFORE VIA STATUTE COULD NOT TAKE TO JCIO.

FURTHER CONSIDER TODAY QUESTIONS IN SCAN EVIDENCE 6


SCAN EVIDENCE 2 THE LEGAL AID STATUTE

JACK YOU WILL NEED EVIDENCE TO REFER TO Rt Hon BUCKLAND AND OMBUDSMAN

What is issue, please see SCAN EVIDENCE 1 AND 4 ,,,,, where we ask State to provide Legal Aid .We have asked lawyers [x100] for years, told by one lawyer,,,,, lawyers will not want to act due to content, you will be brushed off by others, eg they will say too busy, no one on facts, can reject your cry for help , from email reply ,,,,,firms public law lawyers not free to act at present, ,,,,,,,,,,LATER in day, ,call is your public law lawyers taking on new work,,,,,yes ,,,,,, can I put you through ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,contact Bristol Law Center at pre judicial review stage, Jack you are aware in email to you, lawyers and this centre covered in email today , asking for help. In recent request have reply from Bristol Law Centre ,,,,,,,told you last time not taking on new work,,,,, we may so ask why they have website, if for 2 years,,,,,,not taking on work, covered in this email if they want to comment to you Jack . Similar with Pro Bono Unit [London] will not now use them. Badly let down, even later again at court of appeal stage. They were asking court of appeal for more time, court of appeal were understanding, believe they gave 4 extensions to do application, at end court of appeal stated this is final extension, the email sent to Pro Bono Unit . WE GET REPLY AFTER THIS FINAL DATE saying could not find suitable barrister, good job I took advice of retired district judge ,advised do initial application ,can add further evidence to do full application your self,under,,,,, Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS ,,which was done,,,why i went to police day 1, police admit in this IPCC investigation we did not follow IPCC regulations, we sent replyto your alleged appeal, where we admit appeal not lodged. Retired judge,, I will not do I have retired, so you can lodge with court of appeal on time, as let down by Pro Bono Unit ,,,,at last minute have to serve incomplete application, state to court of appeal ,,,,appeal as at 1.7.2018 with application to Legatt LJ to make order so I could obtain further evidence, please see scan 10547, which he ignored, utter breach of Article 6,,,, The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,Jack understand you know legal worker Dr Gupta where raised issue,,,NOT making any allegations , states I did send email to you,,,can not trace,,,could well have gone from his records, if still have ask him to forward to you in 7 days. JACK I PLEASE ASK ,,,,, State to provide Legal Aid. . What are my Human Rights, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,skeletal argument below…

WHAT IS THE HUMAN RIGHT ISSUE IN RESPECT TO LEGAL AID ,,,,,,,,,,,,

C. Legal aid

1. Granting of legal aid

However, the Convention is intended to safeguard rights which are practical and effective, in particular the right of access to a court. Hence, Article 6 § 1 may sometimes compel the State to provide for the assistance of a lawyer when such assistance proves indispensable for an effective access to court (Airey v. Ireland, § 26).


However, the right in question is not absolute and it may therefore be permissible to impose conditions on the grant of legal aid based in particular on the following considerations, in addition to those cited in the preceding paragraph:

the financial situation of the litigant (Steel and Morris v. the United Kingdom, § 62);

his or her prospects of success in the proceedings (ibid).



a/ ,,,,Right and access to a court 81. The right of access to a court for the purposes of Article 6 was defined in Golder v. the United Kingdom (§§ 28-36). Referring to the principles of the rule of law and the avoidance of arbitrary power which underlie the Convention, the Court held that the right of access to a court was an inherent aspect of the safeguards enshrined in Article 6 (Zubac v. Croatia [GC], §§ 76 et seq.). 82. The right to a fair trial, as guaranteed by Article 6 § 1, requires that litigants should have an effective judicial remedy enabling them to assert their civil rights (Běleš and Others v. the Czech Republic, § 49; Naït-Liman v. Switzerland [GC], § 112). 83. Everyone has the right to have any claim relating to his “civil rights and obligations” brought before a court or tribunal. In this way Article 6 § 1 embodies the “right to a court”, of which the right of access, that is, the right to institute proceedings before courts in civil matters, constitutes one aspect (Golder v. the United Kingdom, § 36; Naït-Liman v. Switzerland [GC], § 113). Article 6 § 1 may therefore be relied on by anyone who considers that an interference with the exercise of one of his or her civil rights is unlawful and complains that he or she has not had the possibility of submitting that claim


• b/ A right that is practical and effective . The right of access to a court must be “practical and effective” (Bellet v. France, § 38; Zubac v. Croatia [GC], §§ 76-79). For the right of access to be effective, an individual must “have a clear, practical opportunity to challenge an act that is an interference with his rights” (Bellet v. France, § 36; Nunes Dias v. Portugal (dec.)


c/ In the specific circumstances of a case, the practical and effective nature of the right of access to a court may be impaired, for instance: by the prohibitive cost of the proceedings in view of the individual’s financial capacity:….


Stankov v. Bulgaria, § 5 the Court held that substantial court fees imposed at the end of proceedings could also amount to a restriction on the right to a court.


d/ . In examining the proportionality of a restriction of access to a civil court, the Court takes into account the procedural errors committed during the proceedings which prevented the applicant from enjoying such access, and determines whether the applicant was made to bear an excessive burden on account of such errors. Reference criteria have been laid down for assessing whether it is the applicant or the competent authorities who should bear the consequences of any errors (Zubac v. Croatia [GC], §§ 90-95, § 119). Where errors were made before

e/ Content: civil claims must be capable of being submitted to a judge (Fayed v. the United Kingdom, § 65; Sabeh El Leil v. France [GC], § 46).,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,


FACTS


The judicial review application, fee except, at end of proceedings State issue restraining order ,solely as I appealed ,JUDGEMENT UTTERLY WITHOUT MERIT [IN SCAN EVIDENCE 1 POLICE ADMIT APPLICATION,,IN THIS IPCC INVESTIGATION WE DID NOT FOLLOW IPCC REGULATIONS AND WE SENT REPLY TO YOUR APPEAL WHERE WE ADMIT ONE NOT LODGED,,,,YOU HAVE FURTHER IN THIS DOCUMENT WHY I WENT TO POLICE DAY 1 WHERE TODAY ASK POLICE TO CONFIRM WHY I WENT TO THEM DAY 1] ,seek to remove order the court demands money, utter breach ,,,, Stankov v. Bulgaria, § 5 the Court held that substantial court fees imposed at the end of proceedings could also amount to a restriction on the right to a court.,,,,,the judiciary make order knowing I do not have money to appeal..as they corrupt and frustrate the judicial process, another issue the Court takes into account the procedural errors committed during the proceedings,,,,,,consider application that Legatt ignored and follow up correspondence scan10547 , where in utter breach of Article 6,,, ,The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,, Legatt just ignored application.


I have fundamental basic rights of access to a court , however can not do due to the financial situation of the litigant (Steel and Morris v. the United Kingdom, § 62); We have Master [level of judge at Court of Appeal] confirming he would accept application however demanding 528.00 to hear application.,,,nearly my pension for a month,,,, I am a pensioner can not afford that money. Of course I can not expect State to give Legal Aid where little or no prospect of success. What was application in judicial review, pasted in scan evidence 1 today, , untouched , eg as lawyer stated quoted in application ,,,,, where are we Russia /China, We have retired district judge saying not judicial language however calling HHJCotter and his court staff bastards, as in Profuma case collusion between court and police.


We have Avon Somerset Police ADMITTING IN OWN WORDS


a/ IN THIS IPCC INVESTIGATION WE ADMIT WE DID NOT FOLLOW IPCC REGULATIONS


b/ We sent reply to your appeal where we admit one not lodged


c/ We have just one outstanding issue,,,,why I went to police day 1 , where ask police to confirm, we know as female barrister and judge stated who saw my website,,police ignore,,,,,,would be turkeys voting for Xmas, they ignore, asking for years, also question served under live proceedings, Admin court/court of appeal


CPR regulations PART 32 EVIDENCE

Notice to admit facts

32.18

(1) A party may serve notice on another party requiring him to admit the facts, or the part of the case of the serving party, specified in the notice.,,,,,,,,,,,

which POLICE in questions ignored…Lets ask again with reply to you Jack in 7 days,with no reply Jack ask you to ask them. Coming to end of my life, these questions if need be answered in magistrates court, collecting 5L cans of old oil to throw in police station doorway before sent to prison to die,,,,severe heart condtion.,rejected simple correction surgery. Accept problem can I refer to your HISTORIC Mr Cobbs letter,,,,will write again to Bristol county court, Jack can not force them to reply. Further when ISSUE in proceedings,POLICE in ,utter breach of Article 6 ignore correspondence

The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,,,,,,,,,

I ASK TODAY WHY DID I COME TO YOU DAY 1 WAS IT MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE THE COURTS FOR YEARS IGNORING APPLICATIONS [DID NOT KNOW IF HHJDENYER OR WAS IT COURT STAFF NOT SENDING APPLICATIONS/ CORRESPONDENCE TO HIM,,,]THIS IN INSP O MAHONY ENCLOSED REPLY SCAN 10594 OR WAS IT MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE AS,,,,,,DISSATISFIED OVER THE YEARS OF JUDGEMENTS OF HHJDENYER,,,,IF THIS IS STANCE CAN YOU SEND EVIDENCE TO JACK LOPRESTI MP AND COPY ME INTO REPLY IN 7 DAYS PLEASE.




SCAN EVIDENCE 4 THE OMBUDSMAN ISSUE REFUND OF COURT FEE


SCAN EVIDENCE 4 OMBUDSMAN ISSUE

THIS IS PART OF EMAIL TO JACK LOPRESTI MP ,,,SHOULD BE CONSIDERED WITH FULL EMAIL THE REST OF EMAIL CAN BE FOUND IN WWW.CORRUPTIONINBRISTOLCOUNTYCOURT.COM. SPECIFIC ELEMENT SCAN EVIDENCE 4 ONLY SENT TO THE COURT TODAY ……THEIR SOLE ISSUE

ISSUE ARISES FROM CO/1731/2018 WHERE MASTER [level of judge] GIVES PERMISSION TO MAKE APPLICATION BACK TO THE COURT. NEED TO EXPLAIN TO MEDIA POLICE ARE DEFENDANTS AND COURTS [HMCS ] JUST A INTERESTED PARTY. THE COURTS AS SUCH LIKE RATS IN A SEWER SOMETIME AGO,,,,DO NOT REALLY WANT TO BE INVOLVED THIS IS ISSUE BETWEEN YOU AND POLICE….DO NOT AGREE ,,,,,,,,WHAT ARE ISSUES

POLICE [judiciary state A/ B/ vexatious however police in own words admit allegations]

A/ THIS WAS A IPCC INVESTIGATION WHERE POLICE DID NOT FOLLOW IPCC REGULATIONS IN SCAN EVIDENCE 1 INSP O MAHONY ADMITS WE DID NOT FOLLOW IPCC REGULATIONS

B/ IN EVIDENCE ,,,SCAN EVIDENCE 1 POLICE FURTHER ADMIT WE SENT REPLY TO YOUR APPEAL WHEN NO APPEAL LODGED

C/ THE ONLY OUTSTANDING ISSUE WHY I WENT TO POLICE DAY 1 THIS COVERED IN SCAN EVIDENCE 1 WITH DETAILED EVIDENCE NO NEED TO REPEAT HERE

COURT [THE OMBUDSMAN SOLE ISSUE]

A/ HHJCOTTER DID NOT READ APPLICATION OF THE 6.12.2917 SEEK REFUND OF FEE

Jack sole issue that you have been involved with for years, NOW hope before ombudsman, refund of court fee as application of 6.12.2017 not read by HHJCotter.Simple question they refuse to answer WAS APPLICATION 6.12.2017 READ BY HHJCOTTER ???????????

Jack must be first time do not know HMCS defense to ombudsman issue YOU DO NOT KNOW SO CAN NOT REFER UNTIL YOU KNOW COURTS STANCE. HAVE ASKED SAME QUESTIONS IN LIVE PROCEEDINGS AT JUDICIAL REVIEW AND COURT OF APPEAL STAGE TO POLICE AND COURTS ,,,UNDER

CPR regulations PART 32 EVIDENCE

Notice to admit facts

32.18

(1) A party may serve notice on another party requiring him to admit the facts, or the part of the case of the serving party, specified in the notice.,,,,,,,,,,,

which HMCS in their questions I asked …. ignored…Lets ask again with reply to you Jack in 7 days,with no reply Jack ask you to ask them. Coming to end of my life, these questions if need be answered in magistrates court, collecting 5L cans of old oil to throw in court doorway before sent to prison to die,,,,severe heart condtion. Best outcome to die in police custody after arrest to show what is going on. Accept problem can I refer to your HISTORIC Mr Cobbs letter,,,,will write again to Bristol county court, Jack can not force them to reply. Further when ISSUE in proceedings,CPR 32,,,,IGNORE,,,,COURT ALSO in ,utter breach of Article 6 ignore correspondence

The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,,,,,,,,,

SKELETAL ARGUMENT OF ISSUE

Have restraining order as i appealed HHJCotters/Biggers identical wrong judgement. Stated vexatious to make allegations against police, in scan evidence 1 in own words police admit allegations made. The appeal stands on its own, however in judgement it states facts of case in Cotters judgement, however did Cotter read application,FROM BELOW TOLD HE DID NOT READ,,,,,,,,.READ WRONG PAPERS,,,,application HE MADE ????? FORGERY,

1/November 2017 send court N244 form plus note to HHJCotter where he asks me to make official application and to pay fee, Visit court 5.12.2017 to obtain evidence to do application to the court, The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,,,,,,,,,,eg where lady was more than helpful went to get files, then Mr Blair comes running out saying, your not looking at files, we refuse WHO IS WE ,,HHJCOTTER

opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,,,,,,,,,,Blair,,,make application to Cotter who will also ignore request utter breach of Article 6.which Cotter did,,

2/Demand old N244 form deface write on it not to be sent to Cotter until new N244 send with application next day, 6.12.207,,,made under ,,,,,,,,,,,,,Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS ,,PAID FEE ON THESE CONDITIONS ,,,,, application sent next day via email.,6.12.2017

3/ Series of emails confirming agreement,,,,,Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS for example 7.12.2017

In application yesterday requested that page one of N244 lodged previously was removed and replaced with document sent to you yesterday. Can you please confirm done. IGNORED emails,,,


5.12.2017 timed 16.17 court receipt 16.17

6.12.2017 timed 15.33 15.35 15.45 court receipt same time

7.12.2017 timed 9.58 court receipt 9.59

21.12.2017 timed 11.00 court receipt 11.00.

29.12.2017 timed 4.22 know court had as HHJCotter admits he read as made under Adorisio,,,,,.

Visit court again asking same questions, talk to manager of PSU [known now support through court] who talks to courts Mr Hunt, where Hunt lies to PSU manager states will confirm in 10days if above LISTED EMAILS/ TIME in file, for example application of 6.12.2017 under ,,,,Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS IS IT IN FILE.

AGAIN BELOW UTTER BREACH OF ARTICLE 6 MS PAWSLEY REFUSES EVEN TODAY TO ANSWER QUESTION HUNT STATED TO PSU HE WOULD ANSWER AS HUNT CORRUPTS AND FRUSTRATE THE JUDICIAL PROCESS. JUST LIED TO PSU

4/ For example from application 6.12.2017 and other emails utterly aware why i went to police day 1, as retired District Judge stated after seeing Cotters judgement,,,,,not judicial language however they are utter bastards, he did not read application, visit court,,,,told we did not send to Cotter,removed from file. If did not send what was N244 form sent to Cotter, one Blair/Cotter made up and forged my signature,,,asked for copy of defaced N244 form plus one considered by Cotter, of course if Cotter forged my signature you can see why court ignored my request, under ,,The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,,,,,,,,,and in live proceedings before Admin court and court of appeal under,,,

CPR regulations PART 32 EVIDENCE

Notice to admit facts

32.18

(1) A party may serve notice on another party requiring him to admit the facts, or the part of the case of the serving party, specified in the notice.,,,,,,,,,,,

5/ Told not read, Jan 2018,,,seek refund of court fee, stages complain,,,to Resolver,,,to ombudsman. Court refuses to repay fee only thing we get which QC female judge and barrister stated is intelectual insolence they state we looked in fee section of 6.12.2017 no fee was paid,,,NO FEE REQUIRED FROM ECHR CASE LAW under ,,,,Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS

QUESTIONS

1/ DID HHJCOTTER READ APPLICATION OF THE 6.12.2017

NO,,,,,SEEK REFUND OF COURT FEE

YES….THEN NO APPLICATION TO OMBUDSMAN eg HE READ APPLICATION ,,,,HOWEVER AWARE WHY I WENT TO POLICE DAY 1 SO HE IS DENYING EVIDENCE BEFORE HIM egHE HAS FEDJCAB DOCUMENT THE DOCUMENT POLICE WANTED DAY 1 EXPLAINING MY COMPLAINT

Obligation incumbent on the administrative authorities: the appellant must have access to the relevant documents in the possession of the administrative authorities, if necessary via a procedure for the disclosure of documents (McGinley and Egan v. the United Kingdom, §§ 86 and 90). Were the respondent State, without good cause, to prevent appellants from gaining access to documents in its possession which would have assisted them in defending their case,or to falsely deny their existence, this would have the effect of denying them a fair hearing, in violation of Article 6 § 1 .....

2/ BASIC QUESTION DID YOU GET APPLICATION EMAIL OF THE 6.12.2017 MADE UNDER ,,,,,,,,,,,Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS ,,

YES SO YOU OBTAINED APPLICATION

NO,,,,JACK I CAN SEND COURT RECEIPTS IF THIS IS COURT DEFENCE

3/ Or is defence we will not pay as no fee sent on the 6.12.2017 then via statute in 2/ no fee is required via Case Law. Only reply we have obtained is ,,,,,,,,,, I didn’t find evidence of a properly filed application, with a fee, dated 6 December 2017.,,,,,from statute no fee required. The courts could have resolved issue as I stated in live proceedings at Admin and court of appeal stage eg

Notice to admit facts

32.18

(1) A party may serve notice on another party requiring him to admit the facts, or the part of the case of the serving party, specified in the notice.,,,,,,,,,,,

However all correspondence ignored , tried recently please see court reply as Pawsley corrupts and frustrates the judicial process I ASK AGAIN ANSWER QUESTIONS

Bristol County, E-Filing <e-filing.bristol.countycourt@justice.gov.uk>

23/06/2020 17:19

1

Inbox

Dear Mr Jones

Thank you for your correspondence received in our office on 5 June 2020. Please accept my apologies for the delay in response but I did not have sight of your email until last week due to national issues with our IT equipment.

You have written to the court on several occasions to both myself and Mr Edward Hunt on this very matter. We have previously addressed the questions put to us and we have nothing new we can usefully add.

Any further correspondence in relation to this matter will not be responded to, but will be placed on your file.

Yours sincerely


Jane Pawsey



As you can see again going back to proceedings in Admin /court of appeal just ignore correspondence utter breach of Article 6

The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,,,,,,,,,,

Jack simple question to them did you get application 6.12.2017 as AGREED with court [Blair] under,,, Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS ,,WAS IT READ BY HHJCOTTER. WAS COTTER AWARE OF APPLICATION UNDER ADORISIO ,,YES HE WAS FROM JUDGEMENT

CAN I PLEASE ADDRESS ONLY REPLY WE HAVE FROM Mr Redgrave please see scan redgrace,,,,

I didn’t find evidence of a properly filed application, with a fee, dated 6 December 2017.UNDER CASE LAW NO FEE REQUIRED eg Adorisio,,, ,,, Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,,

CAN I PLEASE ADDRESS REDGRAVES REPLY IN TOTAL AS SHOWS UTTER CORRUPTION OF HMCS COTTER AND REDGRAVE what does he omitAs for years ignoring applications and correspondence ,back to 2010 my website launched, www.corruptioninbristolcountycourt.com . The court asks for removal of website or CONSEQUENCES I WILL NOT BE BLACKMAILED BY CORRUPT AND BENT JUDGE DENYER . Emails stored on Outlook express, not in cloud, need to back up , due to possible litagation over libel. For example courts Mr Fowler called corrupt and bent, trying to get evidence to do HISTORIC judicial review, where he states ,,,,,your letters will not be answered , not read, just filed.....utter breach of Article 6, of the Human Rights Act ,,,,,, [IDENTCAL TO PAWSLEYS LETTER AS THEY CORRUPT AND FRUSTRATE THE JUDICIAL PROCESS] The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,,

Compuwave take on work to back up emails. On invoice they give program to view backuped emails. Program does not work , where Compuwave state was working when you left shop. B26YM042 issued, comes to arbitration , starts late, where parties agree to settle later. AGREED ABOVE FACTS CONFIRMED WITH SCAN REDGRAVE HOWEVER REDGRAVE OMITS FOLLOWING,,,,AS HE CORRUPTS AND FRUSTRATES THE JUDICIAL PROCESS. ,The settlement sent to court, matter settled, wrong program was given on invoice,note Compuwave covered in this document TODAY , if facts not correct ask them to email you Jack. DJWatson asks what was position of person at Compuwave who signed settlement , this emailed to DJWatson by Compuwave, email copy to me, please see COURTS FILE history, however from scan Redgrave can i just add one email that Redgrave omitted from his history,,,as he corrupts and frustrates the judicial process,,,the email settlement to court .....



PHILIP JONES <philip.jones88@btinternet.com>

23/12/2015 09:59

12

5

Scan10246.JPG


CLAIM NUMBER B26YM042 HEARING 5.1.2016


Could you please put before a judge as soon as possible, to vacate hearing 5.1.2016. I accept as in AOIBS346 Jones v N Bristol NHS Trust , for medical records, DJBrittan would not accept settlement and told both parties to attend court. This again was a settlement request from defendants a few days before second hearing, and i informed hospital lawyer, that settlement was nonsense, however they now give me everything requested from day 1. [identical today]


In todays issue, from tab 4 these instructions to read emails are utterly different from instructions given 21.12.2015, from tab 6 my email to defendants, where asked if tab 4 correct, which obtained no reply, as defendants ignored email, proceedings issued. Again a few days before hearing defendants ask to settle, as court aware no papers 14 days before hearing by defendants. ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,UNQUOTE


RECEIPT therefore obtained by Bristol county court…below


Bristol County, E-Filing <e-filing@bristol.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk>

23/12/2015 09:59

1

Your email has been safely received by the Bristol County Court

We will endeavour to process or respond to your email within 5 working days. However please note that if your document requires referral to a Judge you may not get a reply for up to 15 working days.

If your email is regarding a complaint, please allow 10 working days for your concerns to be investigated and a response provided. For further guidance please refer to the EX343 on the Justice Website.

Top Tips

• Send your documents once and do not duplicate a copy in the Post,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,



As Redgrave HMCS states in scanredgrave , due to mediation starting late , I recorded mediation , agreed would settle after mediation, settlement sent scan 10246 attached to above email, above with court receipt,,,,obtained above by court ,,,,. Heard nothing so recorded call to court ,,,ask ,do I have to go to hearing over settled claim, ,,,, we have asked HHJDenyer to remove from hearing date. from above settled, told HHJDenyer removed case from hearing list , matter settled, no need to attend hearing ,,,,,, consider now Denyers deception and corruption, , where of course no one turns up, therefore case was dismissed .Appeal for oral hearing matter settled ,,,, send recorded delivery , copy of tape sent , not to turn up,, see signed for, where appeal application dismissed corrupting and frustrating the judicial process, as scan Redgrave states. . MATTER SETTLED. NOW SEE WHAT BLACKMAIL THREAT CONSEQUENCES MEANT AS RESTAINING ORDER ISSED AS I APPEALED JUDGEMENT BUT THIS IS A SETTLED CASE BETWEEN PARTIES WERE TOLD NOT TO COME TO HEARING,,,,WALKED INTO A TRAP,,,,,DO WE HAVE IDENTICAL SITUATION TODAY RESTRAING ORDER UTTERLY WITHOUT MERIT



JACK DO NOT WANT TO WASTE YOUR TIME COURT TODAY MAY SAY,,,I HAVE BEEN ASKING FOR YEARS ,,,,,APPLICATION 6.12.2017 WAS READ ,,,NO REFUND OF FEE,,,SO IT WAS READ SO COTTER KNOWS WHY I WENT TO POLICE DAY1 ,,MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE IGNORING CORRESPONDENCE AND APPLICATIONS FOR YEARS eg 6.12.2020 EMAIL

CONTACT PHILIP.JONES88@BTINTERNET.COM

This section expands issues in 2016, however the MAIN issue , same issue ignoring applications relate to 2013 issue.

We have response from Sg Price ,Avon Somerset Police ,,,,, insufficient evidence, malfeasance in public office defined by CPS as,,,,,,,,,,,,,wilfully neglecting to perform their duty,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, We have court order to make applications to the Bristol county court, where court/HHJDenyer ignores, wilfully neglecting to perform their duty,,,,,malfeasance in public office. Court confirms orally they will commit malfeasance in public office told HHJDenyer had confimed applications would be ignored, ..............................

IS THIS NOT INFORMING COTTER,,,MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE AS APPLICATIONS BEING IGNORED

A/ THERE IS DOCUMENT 6.12.2017 DEFINED DOCUMENT TITLE SEEKING PERMISSION TO REMOVE RESTRAINING ORDER,,,NOT ADDRESED IN JUDGEMENT SO WAS READ ?????COTTER WHERE IS YOUR JUDGEMENT ON APPLICATION ???????

B/ ,,,DOCUMENT 6.12.2017 ,,,,REQUESTED BY POLICE DAY 1 [feb 2017]THE FEDJCAB DOCUMENT COPIED AGAIN BEFORE IN PRE ACTION PROTOCOL DOCUMENT, FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW,,,AGAIN BEFORE COTTER

CPS in black DIRECT PASTE from their document , my comments were in red to Sgt Price ,eg why I went to police,,, this is subsection of FEDJCAB complete, defined just FEDJCAB eg,,,,, why I went to police

SCOPE OF OFFENCE,,,Misconduct in public office is an offence at common law ,,,,,,,office confined to those that are public office holders and is commited when the office holder acts or fails to act in a way that constitutes a breach of the duties of that office. ,,,,,,,he is judge HHJDenyer that deals with appeals, there is no doubt he failed to act when appeals/appication are sent to him to pervert the course of justice.[CAN I ADD SEE APPENDIX 2][JACK TODAY NOV 2020 WILL ENCLOSE THIS DOCUMENT] DEFINITION OF OFFENCE wilfully neglects to perform his duty and/or wilfully misconduct himself ,,,,,,,,,he failed to perform his duty by ignoring my applications PUBLIC OFFICER ,,,,judges defined as officer,,,,,

FROM 6.12.2017 APPLICATION


CONTACT PHILIP.JONES88@BTINTERNET.COM

This section expands issues in 2016, however the MAIN issue , same issue ignoring applications relate to 2013 issue.

We have response from Sg Price ,Avon Somerset Police ,,,,, insufficient [NO] evidence, malfeasance in public office defined by CPS as,,,,,,,,,,,,,wilfully neglecting to perform their duty,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, We have court order to make applications to the Bristol county court, where court/HHJDenyer ignores, wilfully neglecting to perform their duty,,,,,malfeasance in public office.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

EMAIL 21.12.2017 CAN SEE WHY CORRUPT AND BENT HUNT ALTHOUGH PROMISED MANAGER AT PSU REPLY IN 10 DAYS AS HE CORRUPTS AND FRUSTRATES THE JUDICIAL PROCEES REFUSES TO CONFIRM IF IN FILE,,,MADE UNDER Goc v Turkey.. Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS ,,



APPEAL AGAINST MR KROUWEL LETTER OF 5.12.2017 [this was email of 21.12.2017]



SKELETAL ARGUMENT


1/ Picketing at Bristol county court barrister told me to make complaint to police, malfeasance in public office, plus AGAIN perjury issue, warned police may try to brush you off.


2/ Clearly being brushed off by Sgt Price,, visit recorded,,,,,,,,,,,,,civil issues, make complaint to court, where I inform her I could not make a complaint.;;;;;;[CRIMINAL OFFENCE JCIO CAN NOT INVESTIGATE] tpld malfeasance not a criminal offence.stated on tape ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Where I state are you saying you refuse to investigate, where Sgt Price backs down, requests documents sent to her, eg CPS document, ,,,,,,,criminal offence, judges/police/courts convicted. [recently own police convicted Ibramahimi case]


3/Get reply from PCBird, ,,,,,I am investigating your allegations of malfeasance in public office, make complaint to HMCS, from 2/ aware I could not make a complaint. Accept i have been betrayed by Sgt Price, as wished to sweep under carpet as warned by barrister. .


4/ So complain to police, get reply from Mr Galloway,,,,,,advice was correct to complain to HMCS. Further states no evidence of malfeasance in public office, confirmed also by our third party.


5/ Statutory route to appeal. Asking police questions for appeal,,,,,,,,,,,,,,ISSUE NO EVIDENCE OF MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE. For example Galloway accepts in his letter ,,,, court order to make application ,,,,,, applications made to the court that were ignored, emailed on regular basis for reply to applications which court ignored, back to 2013, , I give evidence for example lawyers /MP also tried to get a reply to applications, which were ignored. Recording with court staff, admit applications made, which were ignored by the court. Have email from police saying if doing appeal need to enclose also our appeal claim form. Further asking police why statutory regulations of IPCC not followed in investigations, reference leaflet sent to me. ..........



SO ALL THESE DOCUMENTS READ CLEAR WENT TO POLICE DAY 1 AS MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE IGNORING APPLICATIONS FOR YEARS DETAILED EVIDENCE IN SCAN EVIDENCE 1 WHERE ASKING POLICE TO CONFIRM TO YOU JACK WHY I WENT TO THEM DAY 1,,,SO COTTER READ WE ASK FROM ABOVE HOW HE COMES TO JUDGEMENT,,,I WENT TO POLICE AS WAS JUST DISSATISFIELD WITH JUDGEMENTS OF HHJDENYER,??????????????????? OR ASK ARE YOU CORRUPT AND BENT

COURT IN CATCH 22 SITUATION eg The court may wish to say not read,,,under ADORISON seek refund of fee,,,,or was read,,,,so Cotter utterly aware why i went to police day1. The courts in a catch 22 situation,,,,seek again today, asking HMCS to answer questions below,Jack you can then see merits if you feel fit to refer to ombudsman. via statute, I can not refer asking you to refer to ombudsman. We will not get a reply collecting cans of old oil to throw in court doorway,,,every week until sent to prison to die, severe heart condition. Chilling from Crown court judge who saw my website,,,could get we can not find file,,,the N244 missing from file ect,,,,

These same questions below in judicial review and in court of appeal live proceedings under

CPR regulations PART 32 EVIDENCE

Notice to admit facts

32.18

(1) A party may serve notice on another party requiring him to admit the facts, or the part of the case of the serving party, specified in the notice.,,,,,,,,,,,

which HMCS ignored…Lets ask again with reply to you Jack in 7 days,with no reply Jack ask you to ask them. Accept problem can I refer to your Mr Cobbs letter,,,,will write again to Bristol county court, Jack can not force them to reply.


a/ On 5.12.2017 the court N244 form was defaced, withdrawn, wrote on it not to send to HHJCotter until new N244 was sent with new application sent ,,,eg under

Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS ,,,can we have copy of defaced N244 form and actual N244 presented to HHJCotter ,,,,ASKING FOR 3 YEARS EVEN IN LIVE PROCEEDINGS UNDER CPR 32,,,ADMIT FACTS,,,IGNORE AS THEY CORRUPT AND FRUSTRATE JUDICIAL PROCESS

b/ Did you get application of the 6.12.2017 made under …..Adorisio ????

Simple question did HHJCotter read application of the 6.12.2017 IF NOT SEEK REFUND OF COURT FEE,,,,was made under Goc v Turkey.. Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS ,,

The N244 defaced until new N244 plus application sent to the court

As female QC barrister and judge stated who saw my website HHJCotter aware of 6.12.2017 application from his judgement , All we obtained from court,looked in court fee records no evidence of application 6.12.2017 on system,,,, was identical reply much later in scan redgrave,,

I didn’t find evidence of a properly filed application, with a fee, dated 6 December 2017. NO FEE REQUIRED AS FEMALE BARRISTER AND JUDGE STATED INTELLECTUAL INSOLENCE SAY WE LOOKED IN FEE SECTION,,APPLICATION NOT THERE,,,NO FEE REQUIRED VIA CASE LAW,,, Goc v Turkey.. Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS ,,YOU WILL SEE THE COURT AGREED 5.12.2017 PROCEDURE USED

Goc v Turkey.. Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS…

SYNOPSIS

1/ Note sent to HHJCotter with court N244 form, where he asks to pay fee to consider an application. Visit court 5.12.2017 as retired District Judge stated, you have made 2 applications to remove restraining order, ignored by the court,,,,[IGNORING OTHER APPLICATIONS BACK TO 2010 ,,YOU WILL SEE LATER 2018 2 MORE APPLICATIONS IGNORED THIS TIME BY HHJCOTTER in judicial review application as i state this is issue of malfeasance in public office ignoring applications for years, still going on in 2018,,,corrupt and bent Cotter states i went to police as ,,,,dissatisfied with judgements over the years of Denyer, as he corrupts and frustrates the judicial process,,,DENYER RETIRED IN 2017 NOTHING TO DO WITH HIS JUDGEMENTS] you need to do here in your official application, an application to remove restraining order,this could be thrown at you for years if not removed.


2/ Seek under The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,,,,,,,,,,,for evidence to do application where courts Mr Blair states 5.12.2017 your not looking at files showing us ignoring your applications, or details of B26YM042 the restraining order issue eg asked is settlement of B26YM042 in file. . Told make application to HHJCotter who will also ignore your request, clearly conspiracy Blair already knew tactics. ,,,utter breach from above of Article 6, Cotter ignored application as Blair said he would. The issue followed up in email of the 7.12.2017….,,,,,We have from file see asked several times with no reply, can I please ask again, case b26ym042 this was settled BEFORE hearing via Tomlin order defendants wanted to use, is this Tomlin order in file please …

3/ Demand on the 5.12.2017 the court N244 form , please see format in scanN244 eg what I want court to do,,,,deface it write on it not to sent to HHJCotter until under Goc v Turkey.. Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS ,,,,A ,NEW N244 SENT [TO REPLACE DEFACED N244 FORM] AND ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, further arguments and evidence to the domestic court WAS SENT

,,,,[eg Adorisio v Netherlands ]

SENT VIA EMAIL NEXT DAY 6.12.2017


4/ Sent application under Goc v Turkey.. Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS ,,,,,6.12.2017 via email, court receipt,WE KNOW COURT OBTAINED ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, email of 7.12.2017 STATED,,

1/ In application yesterday requested that page one of N244 lodged previously was removed and replaced with document sent to you yesterday. Can you please confirm done.[email IGNORED] ,,

4/ Follow up email 21.12.2017 to make sure the removal of restraining order before HHJCotter,,,,eg

Goodafternoon,

We are putting together documents for 2018.

1/ We have application to remove, restraining order, before HHJCotter…..


This email also ignored so visit the court to obtain answers,to make sure application before Cotter, under Adorisio ,,,,,told a reply in due course. Heated argument over ECHR concept of Inequalties of Arms, for example NBT [North Bristol NHS Trust, ] their involvement in scan evidence 5 ,,,again this document sent to them today , if they want to make a comment to you Jack on facts. ,,NBT ,lawyer from emails to me,,,,NUMEROUS TIMES ,,we made application to the court that morning, then later,,,just had reply,,,,ON SAME DAY,,,,I CAN NOT GET ANY REPLIES. Still court ignores me,,,,utter breach of Article 6 …


The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias


However ACCEPT covered years ago in courts Mr Fowlers email,,,,your correspondence will not be read, not answered just filed. ,,,,UTTER BREACH ARTICLE 6


5/ Take up issue of Ineqalities of Arms again in email of the 29.12.2017 ,further in that email,,,


,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.You are aware [efiling] of much detail eg emails in December 2017 ,,,,,,,,,,,,,5, 2 on 6 and one on the 7 of December.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,


,,[Cotter aware of application in 2 parts on the 6.12.2017 ,,,under Goc v Turkey.. Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS ,,,,,I cite application 6.12.2017 which had to be split in 2 due to size,,,I CONCLUDE EMAIL 29.7.2017]




CAN JACK HAVE REPLY VIA EMAIL IN 7 DAYS,,,,,,COPY TO ME VIA EMAIL…,,,WITH NO REPLY IN 7 DAYS WILL ASSUME COURT REFUSES TO REPLY. ,,IGNORED


COTTER AWARE OF EMAIL 7.12.2017 eg 1/ In application yesterday requested that page one of N244 lodged previously was removed and replaced with document sent to you yesterday. Can you please confirm done.[email IGNORED] ,,AWARE OF N244 REMOVED WHAT N244 DID HE READ ????ONE HE MADE UP


6/ Can I now draw things together we know from scan cotterlate he read EMAIL OF 29.12.2017 , which he had to do ,,,


Goc v Turkey.. Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS ,,,,



As several lawyers/barristers stated Cotter is aware of emails of the 5 and 6 [the application] and 7 .12.2017. and they cite,,

Kerojarvi v Finland ,,,,,,,court [COTTER ] must exercise diligence for an appellant not represented by a lawyer,

From scan cotter late, admits all dates in his judgement wrong,,,,we may ask what drugs/intoxication he was on. ,,,,further as retired District Judge stated,,,,after seeing judgement,,,,,not judicial language however they are utter bastards,,,he had not read 6.12.2017 application made under

Goc v Turkey.. Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS ,,,,no reference to removal of restaining order


7/ Went to court told ,,,,we did not send to Cotter . Ask for refund of fee, the ombudsman issue. As female barrister and judge stated,,,interlectual insolence court stance we looked in our fee section no fee paid 6.12.2017,,,,,but no fee required from ECHR case law..

Goc v Turkey.. Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS ,,,,

Again as several lawyers/barristers have stated,,,,if court believed in goodwill a fee was required, and consider… Kerojarvi v Finland ,,,,,,,court must exercise diligence for an appellant not represented by a lawyer,

WHY DID COURT NOT ASK FOR A FEE.

8/ Comes under a Resolver complaint , where court just ignores for years correspondence , where ask you Jack to refer to ombudsman. We go via statute ,,,complaint,,,,to Resolver ,,,to ombudsman , where court corrupts and frustrates the judicial process, as Fowler stated years ago, utter breach of Article 6 ,,,we will ignore your correspondence, will not be read just filed. Escalate issue before you can refer Jack to ombudsman, please see scan redgrave enclosed.

SO TODAY AGAIN ASK

1/ Did you get application/N244 form the replacement of defaced N244 form on the 6.12.2017,as agreed with Blair. Made under,,,Goc v Turkey.. Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS ,,,,if answer is no simple solution for ombudsman,,,,can send you Jack court receipts.....was it read

2/ If not read could you explain to Jack why refund of fee not paid....Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS ,,,,

3/ Can we have copy of defaced N244 form and actual N244 considered by Cotter.

4/ Why is above important,,,we have restraining order because of vexatious comments about police,,,,where in scan evidence 1 police in own words admit allegations. In scan evidence 1 to complete appeal ask police again in own words to confirm why i went tothem day 1. As it were iceing on cake we have judgement,,,,facts of case in Cotters judgement copied by Bigger,,,BUT COTTER WE WILL SHOW DID NOT READ APPLICATION,,,,OR IF STATING I DID THEN CORRUPT AND BENT DENYING EVIDENCE BEFORE HIM,,,We have Crown court judge,,,,judiciary protecting their own,,,or numerous lawyers/barristers,,,,Legatt LJ already judged case without looking at facts as he protects judiciay who are corrupt and bent...LAWYERS CITE SHARING,,

Can I refer to Sharing v Preston cc [2012] EWHC 515 where clearly Legatt had judged case before looking at facts, ,,,,mind already made up,,,,,as he stated,,,,,facts of case in HHJCotters judgement,,,but this is story HHJCotter made up to corrupt and frustrate the judicial process , ITS WRONG ON FACTS eg why I went to defendants, as CPS FEDJCAP document ect FEDJCAB its in pre action protocol for judicial review document,,,,DID NOT GO TO DEFENDANTS OVER JUDGEMENTS OF HHJDENYER. From Sharing,, The ‘fair minded and independent bystander’ test used here should clearly be in the mind of any representatives who feel that they have been effectively rejected without serious hearing on appeal – IN EMAIL 13.7.2018 THE COURT OF APPEAL HAS THE FEDJCAP DOCUMENT,,,IT KNOWS I DID NOT GO TO DEFENDANTS OVER JUDGEMENTS OF HHJDENYER

























The selected background to B26YM042 in scan redgrave,as he corrupts and frustrates the judicial process ,facts correct...REDGRAVE BENT AND CORRUPT WHAT HAVE YOU FAILED TO DISCLOSE ONE EMAIL AND COURT RECEIPT ABOVE.

CONCLUSION

1/ We need to get court to confirm did you get email application of the 6.12.2017 YES OR NO … made under,,,,,,

Goc v Turkey.. Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS ,,,HAVE ASKED FOR YEARS EVEN UNDER LIVE PROCEEDINGS,,,,, Notice to admit facts

32.18

(1) A party may serve notice on another party requiring him to admit the facts, or the part of the case of the serving party, specified in the notice.,,,,,,,,,,,

The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,,,,,,,,,

,NO,,,,,,,,,,,THEN WHAT IS CONSEQUENCE BACK TO COURT OF APPEAL. COTTER READ WRONG PAPERS,,,,LEGATT l LJ IN JUDGEMENT STATES FACTS OF CASE IN COTTERS JUDGEMENT COPIED BY HHJBIGGERS JUDGEMENT BUT COTTER DID NOT READ APPLICATION OF 6.12.2017. WE HAVE BARRISTERS WHO SAW MY WEBSITE eg FEMALE MANCHESTER,,,,MALE BIRMINGHAM,,,CITING SAME CASE,,, Can I refer to Sharing v Preston cc [2012] EWHC 515 where clearly Legatt LJ had judged case before looking at facts, ,,,,mind already made up,,,,,as he stated,,,,,facts of case in HHJCotters judgement,,,but this is story HHJCotter made up to corrupt and frustrate the judicial process , ITS WRONG ON FACTS eg why I went to defendants, as CPS FEDJCAB document ect FEDJCAB its in pre action protocol for judicial review document,,,,DID NOT GO TO DEFENDANTS OVER JUDGEMENTS OF HHJDENYER. From Sharing,, The ‘fair minded and independent bystander’ test used here should clearly be in the mind of any representatives who feel that they have been effectively rejected without serious hearing on appeal ,LETS SEE IF THEY STATE WE DID NOT GET 6.12.2017 APPLICATION THEN CAN SUPPLY COURT RECEIPTS PLUS FURTHER EVIDENCE SENT TO THE COURT THIRD PARTY AS RETIRED DISTRICT JUDGE STATED LETS SEE IF THEY STATE THIS CAN SHOW FURTHER DISHONESTY FROM OTHER EVIDENCE WE HAVE,,,,SEEK REFUND OF FEE AS NOT READ .IS DEFENCE NOT READ AS NO FEE ENCLOSED FROM CASE LAW,,, Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS ….NO FEE REQUIRED.

2/ YES…THEN COTTER AWARE WHY I WENT TO POLICE DAY 1,,AWARE N244 DEFACED WITH NEW N244 PLUS APPLICATION ,,FROM ABOVE DENYING EVIDENCE BEFORE HIM. FURTHER AWARE APPLICATION TO REMOVE RESTRAINING ORDER WHY WAS IT NOT CONSIDERED THAT’S WHAT I PAID FOR.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

SCAN EVIDENCE 5 THE NBT ISSUE [NORTH BRISTOL NHS TRUST]

1/ NBT left me disabled, in chronic pain, ,,,,,,further in later inguinal hernia surgery a disaster, as failed in a few days …... later court application was for medical records, and to put via statute a message in medical records , and travel expensives. Comes before DJWatson at hearing , makes court order,,,where he asks defendants third party for statement , where case then struck out in papers supplied by NBT,,,,[statement utterly untrue]where ask for oral hearing. Just before second hearing defendants ask to settle, supply medical records, pay travel expenses, and agree to put statement in medical records eg .,,,,,ACCEPT MY CLAIM Defendants send their settlement to the court, rejected by DJBrittan, [ Brittan in claim a long time ago asked me to leave court so he could discuss case with then defendants,,,,,,where took up issue with then defendants lawyer with reply ,,,we would not be seen discussing case behind your back with Brittan for you to exploit later ,,,,said have to catch plane can not talk,,,,excuse made not to talk to Brittan ] where NBT above case comes before again DJWatson.

Before from file had recording for example from radiology that their medical records not disclosed, said 6 MONTHS BEFORE RESOLVE ISSUE WHERE NBT JUST STATE YOUR CLAIM STRUCK OUT BY DJWATSON ,,,,, WILL NOT SUPPLY MEDICAL RECORDS WILL NOT TALK TO YOU

For example in NBT case defendants asked to settle, A FEW DAYS BEFORE second HEARING At hearing they requested that judgement reads i acted unreasonably, this was rejected by the court, Ms Smith for defendants would not let it drop, I could not get into conversation, as DJWatson right hand raised in my direction,,,,,NO COMPLAINT OVER DJWATSON. DJWatson stated as in judgement he had read file and would not state this, eg I WAS ACTING UNREASONABLY aware 6 months ago asked to settle,,,,now suppling 6 months later medical records,,,putting statement in medical records ,,,paying travel expenses. CAN I REFER TO RETIRED DISTRICT JUDGE IN APPLICATION 6.12.2017 MADE UNDER TODAYS ISSUE NOT RELATED TO NBT WHERE STATED NOT JUDICIAL LANGUAGE HOWEVER BRISTOL COURT ARE UTTER BASTARDS. VIEW BACKED UP BY JUDICIARY PLEASE SEE MAIN TEXT TODAY . NBT LAWYER Ms SMITH LAWYER CALLED A BITCH,,,WITH FOLLOW UP APOLOGY BY ME AGAIN NOT JUDICIAL LANGUAGE. FROM MAIN TEXT MEDIA COVERED IF Ms Smith wants to contest content Jack,,,Today as in 3 appeals to remove restraining order,, I refer to ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,


Brumarescu v Rumania ,,,,,fundamental aspect of rule of law is the principle of legal certainty,which requires that when the courts have finally decided an issue then ruling should not be called into question ,,,,Tregubenko v Ukrain ,,,,,,,calling into question of decision in this manner whether it be by judges or the exeutive ............[did HHJDenyer call judgement into question, I HAD NOT ACTED UNREASONABLY please see below]

Athough matter determined by court , i had not acted unreasonably, its cited by HHJDenyer in a restraining order MADE because I acted unreasonably , as I appealed DJWatsons judgement, appeal,,,,,, medical records still outstanding, travel expenses not paid and refusal to put statement in my medical records, ,,,,,,,. Further cites claim v Compuwave,, please see details in scan evidence 4,,,,,where we have again case settled, where told not therefore to attend hearing, as matter settled, it had been removed by Denyer from hearing date, where as no one turned up, case dismissed, where seek to appeal,,,,the recording with court not to attend sent to Denyer,where appeal dismissed. AGAIN PART OF RESTRAINING ORDER AS I APPEALED.


2/ In next year 2018 make application for more medical records,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,DATES LATER THAN PREVIOUS CASE THEREFORE COULD NOT BE INCLUDED IN PREVIOUS POC, [PARTICULARS OF CLAIM.] NBT again refuse to release, where HHJCotter strikes out claim,,,,???????????????????i As retired district judge stated,,,,you make application to the court,,,,goes on computer system,TAKES TIME,,,,then goes to a PRE OR DISTRICT JUDGE FOR DIRECTIONS. WHY ON SAME DAY SENT TO HHJCOTTER THE DAY YOU LODGED PROCEEDINGS,,,,IS IT A CASE DO NOT ISSUE HIS PROCEEDINGS SEND TO ME FIRST TO SEE IF I CAN FIND A LOOPHOLE TO STRIKE OUT, in papers. As various barristers/lawyers state,,,,,was struck out as abuse of process,,,,Blair aware of previous claim did he take straight away saying should have been included in previous POC,,,REASON STRUCK OUT..] Appeal , get hearing date, where Cotters clerk then states have had long talk with NBT over defence, …..hearing date agreed with NBT removed from list, WE HAVE AGREED WAY FORWARD. . WHAT HAS THIS CORRUPT COURT ORGANISED WITH NBT ????


3/ So application N244 to court to find out what was agreed with NBT ,,,,,IGNORED , ,,,,,WENT TO COURT TOLD COURT WILL NOT REPLY TO APPLICATION


SEE TODAYS ISSUE IN JUDICIAL REVIEW MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE IGNORING APPLICATIONS FOR YEARS STILL GOING ON IN 2018. ,,,,,THIS APPLICATION IGNORED


LETTER 25.2.2018,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,WITH APPLICATION ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,


I will from start today make a stance, i will not tolerate any fresh nonsense defendants lawyer Ms Smith puts before the court. I REQUEST BY 5.00 PM 26.2.2018 SHE SENDS TO ME VIA EMAIL HER COMMENTS TO THIS ORDER.WITHOUT THIS WILL REQUEST AN ADJOURNMENT SO I CAN AT A LATER DATE PRODUCE DOCUMENTS IN TERMS OF ALLEGATIONS FILED AFTER I SEE DEFENCE .

Ruiz –Materis v Spain,,,,,,,,,,,,,,plaintiff to have knowledge and comment on all evidence adducted or observations filed,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

APEH et al v Hungary ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,it is inadmissible for one party to make submissions to a court without knowledge of the other and on which the later has no opportunity to comment,,,,

Are we going to have the utter nonsense as in OBS08441 which i won where DJWatson states,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,do you want to come back after i get you a defence, …..


ALREADY CASES WHERE IN UTTER BREACH OF ARTICLE 6 HAVE NO DEFENCE TO MY CLAIM


4/ No defence therefore,,,,,can I please cite POC…]PARTICLARS OF CLAIM]


IN THE BRISTOL COUNTY COURT CASE NUMBER


PLAINTIFF PHILIP JONES

DEFENDANTS NORTH BRISTOL NHS TRUST

CLAIM ,,,eg asking court

For defendants to release medical records of 24.7.2015 and for plaintiff to put a statement in DEFENDANTS medical records.

LEGAL BASIS ,,,,,1/ ,No evidence required in terms of obtaining medical records, in terms of putting statement in medical records, please see statutory regulations of NHS ,,,,,,the defendants must allow if requested for plaintiff to add statement to his medical records.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,


Comes before HHJRalton , Jack you can not get involved in court judgements, not asking you to, todays application to you primary for legal aid., nothing to do with NBT, Ralton states,,,,,,,,,,,,,,had very long discussion with Cotter over this case,,,[Cotter makes judgement,,,i appeal,,,why is Ralton discussing case with Cotter,,,,may I suggest todays issue,,,,Bigger makes judgement,,,did he ask Legatt LJ to issue restraining order] ,,,Ralton states reason he struck out as your POC utterly incomprensible he did not know what you wanted court to do,,,,????????????????????FOR MEDIA YOU HAVE POC ABOVE YOU MAKE DEDUCTIONS DO YOU KNOW WHAT I WANTED COURT TO DO


5/ NBT agree to supply medical records of set day taken cited in the POC, plus put statement in medical records. Get letter of third party understanding of medical records, however as statute do not get at this stage copy of medical records taken on day. Ask to look at medical records, from recording statement not in file. Ask for actual records TAKEN ON CITED DATE FROM HOSPITAL FILE REFUSED BY NBT. From judgement if not supplied can made application back to the court. Talk to PSU, [know now support through court…..covered them today in this document…if they wish to contact in 7 days you Jack,,,,. They talk to court staff at Bristol county court,,,,,where must admit court staff were good trying to help. Agreed court staff/ PSU to write letter to HHJRalton,,,,,,eg should I under a N244 court form ask for order to release medical records taken on cited day, informed his judgement ignored,,,,explained discussed with court/PSU they recommended letter to him. As several people barristers/judges stated,,,,, Kerojarvi v Finland ,,,,,,,court must exercise diligence for an appellant not represented by a lawyer,

Could understand in reply ….not allowed to give legal advice,,,where you could have made application with new N244 form,,,,,however can I refer to todays issue,,IGNORING APPLICATIONS FOR YEARS STILL GOING ON IN 2018,,,,STILL GOING ON WHERE COURT STATES IN RECORDING AT COURT,,,,,,,HHJRALTON HAS NO COMMENT TO MAKE,,,AWARE HIS ORDER NOT ADHERED TO


SCAN EVIDENCE 6




FURTHER EVIDENCE OF POLICE IGNORING APPLICATIONS AS THEY CORRUPT AND FRUSTRATE THE JUDICIAL PROCESS


1/ Obtain letter scan police june enclosed. A letter retired District Judge called appaling, ITS ,,undated ,,,,,incomprenensible ,,,,in utter breach of ECHR [criminal limb ] Case Law.


357. The requirements related to the burden of proof from the perspective of the principle of the presumption of innocence provide inter alia, that it is for the prosecution to inform the accused of the case that will be made against him or her, so that he or she may prepare and present his or her defence accordingly, and to adduce evidence sufficient to convict him or her (Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo v. Spain, § 77; Janosevic v. Sweden, § 97).


Article 6 § 3 of the Convention “3. Everyone charged with a criminal offence has the following minimum rights: (a) to be informed promptly, in a language which he understands and in detail, of the nature and cause of the accusation against him; (b) to have adequate time and facilities for the preparation of his defence; (c) to defend himself in person or through legal assistance of his own choosing or, if he has not sufficient means to pay for legal assistance, to be given it free when the interests of justice so require; (d) to examine or have examined witnesses against him and to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him;


The allegations of alleged criminal offence not defined,,,what are your allegations,,, to be informed promptly, in a language which he understands and in detail, of the nature and cause of the accusation against him; and where is the ,,,,, principle of the presumption of innocence provide inter alia, that it is for the prosecution to inform the accused of the case that will be made against him or her, so that he or she may prepare and present his or her defence accordingly, and to adduce evidence sufficient to convict him or her (Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo v. Spain, § 77; Janosevic v. Sweden, § 97).



Ruiz –Materis v Spain,,,,,,,,,,,,,,plaintiff to have KNOWLEDGE and comment on all evidence adducted or observations filed



This issue raised in letter below, 26.5.2020 ,,,ignored by police, therefore as ignored, official complaint to them 1.6.2020...WHICH THEY IGNORED IS THIS SIMILAR TACTICS AS ASKING WHY I WENT TO POLICE DAY 1 IN MEETING WITH SGT PRICE AS REPLY WOULD BE FATAL TO POLICE TACTICS ,,,WE WILL JUST IGNORE. JACK CAN I PLEASE ASK THEM FOR REPLY TO YOU JACK IN 7 DAYS WITH COPY TO ME. SURE THEY WILL IGNORE WHERE PLEASE ASK YOU JACK TO ASK FOR A REPLY TO COMPLAINT OF THE 1.6.2020. YOU WILL REQURE EVIDENCE IN PRESENTATION TO RT HON BUCKLAND


Clearly police mind made up,,,,already judged case ,,,,,if this behaviour continues ,,,WHAT BEHAVIOUR where is,,, the principle of the presumption of innocence provide inter alia, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,


Can I refer to Antisocial behaviour is defined as 'behaviour by a person which causes, or is likely to cause, harassment, alarm or distress to persons not of the same household as the person' (Antisocial Behaviour Act 2003 and Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011 ).


Police have judged case well ask police to inform you Jack of evidence they have of antisocial behaviour,,,in 7 days with copy of email to me. Again Jack with no reply ask you to ask them,,,have they a criminal case,,,,no,,,is this not harassment



31 Bibury Ave

Bristol

BS346DF

26.5.2020


Dear Ms Domalewaka.


Can I refer to your letter which retired district judge stated was ,,,,,,,,utterly incomprehensible , undated, information he stated he would expect to be included. who made complaint, what is complaint, when was complaint made, when was first date you tried to contact me can you please supply information before the 1.6.2020 by email. , . This will be included in document being prepared in last month, for my MP. Situation where retired district judge who saw my website ,suggested my MP collating evidence before presenting to government justice minister Rt Hon Buckland. The document nearly ready to be sent to Jack, [Jack Lopresti MP] , however will wait until 1.6.2020 for your reply, if any.. Can say as with other correspondence ,even YOU ignored,,,,As with Insp O Mahony letter where she confirmed police in IPCC investigation did not follow IPCC regulations , informed her would not discuss case , until written reply from her, will not discuss todays situation with you without reply first, require a email so we know police stance before contacting Jack.


We have had letter from court of appeal that Master [judge at court of appeal] given permission to appeal court order, , and legal advice that we can proceed against you via ECHR , believed via BREXIT route not open, told not so.


As I said letter to Jack in advanced stage,,,,eg ,,,,,informing local/national press what is going on….draft document extracts …eg


2/ Great interest in the Profuma affair, as a young man purchased the blue covered Lord Denning report, still have it , where corruption between police and the courts eg , my main interest was Stephen Ward, however at this time my letters to Christine Keeler and the press,,,,,for example letter from national newspaper ,,,,,,Ms Keeler was not innocent party in this, see copy of Holland magazine advert ,,,,,see 8mm film 18 dollars ,,,, only homosexuals do this see Christine Keeler take penis in rectum,,, Also aware of Tom Mangold ex BBC journalist , from start involved in Profuma affair,[ via Daily Express , will forward this document to paper, ] with his recent recollections after BBC recent showing the Profuma story, on BBC series, will ask the BBC to forward this document also to him. Jack [Lopresti MP ] from our recent timetable sought replies from police and HMCS [ HM court service ] , if questions not answered we requested you to contact them.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,


WILL USE SEVERAL TIMES CAN WE DEFINE TERM OETICARF ,,Overwhelming Evidence Tactically Ignore Correspondence As Reply Fatal

We have case where police are defendants and civil courts are interested party, police can not answer question,,,,,why did I come to you on day 1 , and court can not answer question ,,,,did HHJCotter read revised application of 6.12.2017 , made under Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS , ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,


LETS STATE FACTS ASK QUESTION WAS I RIGHT SAYING POLICE DID NOT FOLLOW IPCC REGULATIONS. POLICE ADMIT THEY DID NOT. WAS I RIGHT SAYING POLICE SENT REPLY 24.7.2017 TO ALLEGED APPEAL WHERE ONE NOT LODGED. JUST LOOK AT KROUSELS LETTER AS ASKING QUESTIONS TO DO THE APPEAL


You then emailed in reply 22.7.2017 and accused,,,,,,,,,,,,,of sweeping under the carpet.You also said will assume with no email reply by 9.00 am 28.7.2017 there would be no reply,[ TO QUESTIONS ] and can do appeal to you


FINAL ISSUE JACK SO WE WILL HAVE IN POLICE OWN WORDS ADMITTING MY APPLICATION BACK TO COURT OF APPEAL IN FULL ,,,IT WAS NOT VEXATIOUS TO MAKE APPLICATION ,,,WE ALREADY HAVE IN OWN WORDS WE DID NOT FOLLOW IPCC REGULATIONS IN THIS IPCC INVESTIGATION AND WE SENT REPLY TO YOUR APPEAL,,,,,YOU HAVE NO EVIDENCE OF MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE COURTS IGNORING APPLICATIONS AND CORRESPONDENCE FOR YEARS ,,[,CORRUPT POICE HAD LETTER FROM COURT,,,,WE IGNORED YOUR APPLICATIONS COME AND TALK TO US,,,]WHEN NO APPEAL LODGED. IS THIS NOT AS WHEN STEVEN WARD PROSECUTED IN PROFUMA CASE ,,,AS CORRUPTION BETWEEN POLICE AND COURTS. WE HAVE JUST ONE OUTSTANDING ISSUE WHERE REQUIRE POLICE IN OWN WORDS TO CONFIRM WHY I WENT TO THEM ON DAY ONE,,,,,,AS FEMALE QC BARRISTER AND JUDGE STATED,,WHO SAW MY WEBSITE THERE IS GENERALLY A CORNERSTONE ISSUE IN CASE. SAY SITTING AS A JUDGE DEFENDANT SEEN LEAVING BANK AFTER ROBBERY BUT CASE FAILS AS DEFENDANT ON DAY IN CLOSED PRISON,,,,IN YOUR CASE CORNERSTONE ISSUE WHY YOU WENT TO POLICE ON DAY 1,,,,AND IT WAS NOT AS ,,,,DISSATISFIED WITH JUDGEMENT OF HHJDENYER,,,,YOU HAVE RECORDING DAY 1 RECORDING WITH SGT PRICE WHERE I STATE MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE COURTS IGNORING APPLICATIONS FOR YEARS, REASON I WENT TO POLICE WE HAVE HHJCOTTER CONFIRMING MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE A CRIMINAL OFFENCE ,WE HAVE POLICE SAYING NOT OUR PROBLEM COMPLAIN TO JCIO, WE HAVE JCIO SAYING POLICE WRONG, VIA STATUTE WE CAN NOT INVESTIGATE COMPLAINTS IF CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS,,,,JCIO,,,


We cannot investigate

Allegations of criminal activity for example, perverting the course of justice , [Eaga case perjury/malfeasance in public office ] (criminal allegations should be directed to the POLICE )SGT PRICE ON RECORDING STATES SHE WOULD NOT GIVE TO OFFICER TO INVESTIGATE IF NOT A CRIMINAL OFFENCE,,,WHERE BRUSHED OFF BY POLICE,,AS WARNED BY BARRISTER WHO SAW ME PICKETING AT THE COURT from COPWATCH


For most people the police complaints process is a depressing waste of time. Not only do the police get to investigate themselves and help fellow officers escape misconduct charges, they get to handle appeals to…[further quotes from paper below ,,,,]


When it was recently reported that the police only investigate 4 out of 10 crimes, the Home Office responded by stating: “We expect the police to investigate ALL crime.”

And if the police start reciting huge chunks of legislation in a bid to get rid of you, don’t be afraid to remind them that it is not their job to interpret the law. It is their job to enforce it. The Home Office, the government and the courts are there to explain the fineries of legislation, not some lazy cop who has probably memorized it by rote just to help him pass a Sergeant’s exam……


,POLICE STATE YOU STATED IN JUDICIAL REVIEW APPLICATION PRACTICE STILL GOING ON IN 2018,,,,BUT DENYER RETIRED IN 2017. IT’S A OETICARF WHERE POLICE CAN NOT,,,WILL NOT ANSWER QUESTION WHERE SEEK JACK YOUR HELP. AS FINAL NAIL IN THEIR COFFIN AS THEN WOULD HAVE COMPLETE APPLICATION IN OWN WORDS ADMITTED BY POLICE. SO WE CAN SAY TO LEGAL AID BOARD THIS IS JUDGEMENT OF HHJBIGGER ,,,,ITS WRONG IN EVERY ASPECT ADMITTED BY DEFENDANTS POLICE IN OWN WORDS……UNQUOTE .back to your letter



Can I address your letter, retired district judge who saw my website asks, can you confirm in writing allegations of anti social behaviour, further stated it appears police have already judged this case,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,if this behaviour continues ?????? WHAT BEHAVIOUR ,,,,which we will take further with Jack,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,. We have one neighbour who vandalised my property, ON MY OWN LAND erected barrier to stop him damaging new trees purchased/planted , is this what your talking about, can not be,,,, allegations that his mail stolen and damaged,,,,,have Royal Mail plastic sleeve,,,,,,,,,,,,,,found open and damaged,,,,I did not damage anything,as found was dispatched to them, in terms of stolen mail, asked you to contact S Glos Council , email day 1 asked for instructions where told to post back to them, where council confirm obtained, WHAT ARE YOUR ALLEGATIONS. This can not be issue all calls in and out recorded, where this matter raised by you, [police] and concluded sometime ago, eg from recording all material delivered as found, and parking pass already sent to council over week ago. WHAT ARE YOU ALLEGATIONS Your letter a utter nonsense , undated letter, states do not contact neighbour, no thought of ever doing, WE HAVE LETTER POSTMARKED 30.4.2020 FROM THEM,,,,,,WHY ARE THEY CONTACTING ME. Why would I contact common working class people, I will stand my ground sometime ago postman stated,,,,,,,,,,,,,,this ,neighbour had problems with neigbours before they moved here,,,,assume was local,,,, SINCE HERE LOOKING FOR TROUBLE……………THEY HAVE COME TO RIGHT PLACE WHERE APPEAR POLICE TAKEN THEIR SIDE ,,,,,IF BEHAVIOUR CONTINUES ,,,WHAT BEHAVIOUR.


You state problem getting in touch was this on phone, problem with phone downstairs,,,,,BT coming after Covid clears, can you supply date/time,,,,know several times,,,,number withheld rings about 5 times then rings off, as time I moved upstairs to answer, can collate with CCTV with day and time and my arms raised outside as did not give me time to answer.


As I stated giving you 7 days to reply,can state you ignored my letter with no email,,,,,, then to send to Jack, as district judge plans,long term, with cover in letter to Jack to IPCC, PCC, national /local newspapers ,police and courts, look forward to your reply.


As retired district judge stated clearly you had judged case, is this victimization as proceedings against you, you allege anti social behaviour as judge said instead of judging case, suggest you arrest and put your allegations to a court. , what are allegations when were they made, when was first day you tried to contact. In old case the mail issue as a separate issue again what were allegations, when were they made, and what was first day you tried to contact me, as judge stated interesting in both cases to see time before allegations made and when you tried to contact.


P JONES ….this was 1.6.2020 LETTER IN FULL police receipt to above letter STILL WAITING FOR REPLY TO COMPLAINT


2/ Retired District Judge suggested could relate to neighbour issue,eg Bird. In discussion this raises other issues,,,,,required for media….


HISTORY


a/ Threat of violence from Bird ,,, recorded on VoiceCam,,,he ,takes a police caution. Can I refer to police response we will not come out again over this neighbour dispute,,,is this not as recent Ebrahimi case where your officers jailed as they ignored complaints of criminal behaviour, can you confirm to Jack still your stance.


b/ For years leaving rubbish in front of my garage. Coming home a boy approx. 12 yo stopped me stated as soon as you went out your neighbour vandalising your property, cutting down hedge. Coming home neighbour a few doors away laughing. Report to police Patchway police station , again recorded on VoiceCam,,,told rarely home best to contact via email to organise contact. Police arrived OVER 2 weeks later state talked to neighbour,,,,,he stated cut down by travellers ,,,,they then come back offering to correct defect replanting.


c/ Start get on regular basis letters for them,,,,,,,,for example on CCTV shows me taking letters to them where abused. Later get letters, as abused, threats of violence, so left on van,eg underneath windscreen wipers. Then get damaged letters in Royal Mail bag,,,,,they state on bag ,,,found open and damaged on Royal Mail plastic bag.


d/ Then get parking permit ,,,,,name on letter unknown,,,,not Bird . Email council where told to return to them, which was done they confirm obtained.


e/ Then get letter from Bird saying I had stolen parking pass, then recorded call from police about stolen item, where told from recording returned to South Glos Council,,,,i had Royal Mail proof of posting. Angry as assumed council had reported me to police I had stolen ,,,,can I quote their reply,,,,we obtained, you returned we did not communicate with anyone.


f/ As retired District Judge stated,,,,,how did Bird know the parking pass was with you ?????????did he plant on you,,,,,,as other letters for him, and then complain to police, I had stolen ,,,waste of their time, over series of mail non delivery. THE COUNCIL STATE WE MADE NO CONTACT OVER MATTER,,,,ASKED QUESTION BEFORE JACK PERHAPS POLICE CAN ANSWER QUESTION. HOW DID YOU KNOW I HAD STOLEN PASS IN THEIR ALLEGATION


g/ In complaint 1.6.2020 complain about antisocial behaviour, ask police do you want Royal Mail bag,,,,found open and CONTENTS damaged…from above complaint just ignored. We have if police want to see CCTV trespass on my property kicking gates open and leaving tree branches in front of my garage,,,summer 2020,,,from above anti social behaviour informed you what was occurring,,,. WE ASK TODAY HAVE YOU TALKED TO HIM OR ARE POLICE HAPPY FOR THIS TO CONTINUE. ..CAN YOU CONFIRM AS IN EBRAHIMI CASE .WE WILL NOT COME OUT,,,. RECENTLY again on CCTV not leaving cut down branches between fence and my hedge which he vandalised , but again entering my property,,,leaving on path on entrance to house. DO YOU MAINTAIN NOT UNSOCIAL BEHAVIOUR ,,,FURTHER IN TERMS OF ECHR CASE LAW THE CONCEPT OF INEQUALITY OF ARMS,,,,IS BIRDS BEHAVIOUR ACCEPTABLE WELL LETS CONSIDER WITH ALLEGATIONS MADE BY POLICE AGAINST ME,,,,,ALREADY DETERMINED BY POLICE INVOLVED IN ANTI SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR. WHAT ARE YOU ALLEGATIONS PLEASE INFORM JACK IN 7 DAYS….BIRD IS A BUILDER ,,,PLEASE SEE PHOTO 195 WHERE HE WASHES OUT VAN AND SWEEPS SAND OUTSIDE MY PROPERTY ,,,ASSUME HAPPY FOR THIS TO OCCUR. THIS OF COURSE EXPLAINED IN YOUR CONTACT WITH ME,,,,I HAVE BEEN TOLD BY INSPECTOR WE WILL NOT COME OUT OVER YOUR DISPUTE WITH BIRD HOWEVER WILL ACT FOR HIM PARKING PASS ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIOUR SO HE CAN DO ANYTHING ,,,CUT DOWN MY HEDGE AND THEY ARE HAPPY WITH THIS….WE INFORM MEDIA….SO HE CAN VANDALISE MY PROPERTY STILL EVEN IN LAST few WEEKS LEAVE BRANCHES ON MY PATH, CAN SWEEP SAND OUTSIDE MY PROPERTY AND YOU DO NOT CONSIDER ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIOUR……YOU MAKE ALEGATIONS OF MY ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIOUR ????YOU HAVE CHANCE INFORM JACK IN 7 DAYS,,,,AND FURTHER STOP PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE, MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE,,,,INFORM JACK IN 7 DAYS WHY I CAME TO YOU DAY 1


/ THE SECOND INCIDENT


a/ HMCS payed me 150.00 compensation as they refused to issue proceedings , due to alleged restraining order in place. There was no order in place, assume HHJBigger had told Salford county court not to issue, Bigger at Admin court Cardiff, . Where Bigger behind my back asked court of appeal to issue restraining order. In my website produce list of people on restraining order, just to confirm not on list for any reader



b/ Then get months later string of offensive threating emails from Rosa Malagac . There is vindictive website indicating her case and on court order restraining order list. I do not know woman, know nothing of her case, however my site cited with this NEW google site. Due to continue string of emails from her contact the police. All calls in/out recorded where police ask how they contact her. From recording accept police very busy, would it help when they are in her area on ANOTHER job they talk to her. Police state what is address, where state do not know, however Court of Appeal issued order, they would have address, next thing told taking no action, where get further string of emails from her.


c/ She now states talked to Avon Somerset Police where told you have mental health problems , you are delusionary in your allegations. Make complaint to police who made these libel allegations. What were allegations DELUSIONARY ?????


1/ In a IPCC investigation you did not follow IPCC regulations,,you admit this ,,,see scan 10594


2/ You sent reply to appeal where one not lodged,,you admit this scan 10475/10494 You then emailed in reply 22.7.2017 and accused,,,,,,, of sweeping under the carpet…..You also said will assume with no email reply by 9.00 am 28.7.2017 there would be no reply and can do appeal to you….YOUR REPLY OF 24.7.2017 CAN NOT BE REPLY TO AN APPEAL


3/ We have one outstanding issue why I came to you day 1,,,was it malfeasance in public office as court ignoring correspondence and applications for years,,,you asked day one to send CPS document [FEDJCAB] to you,,,,further as told you via statute could not take to JCIO as they confirmed as a criminal offence, complaints as JCIO state must be made to you via statute as criminal offence ,,,your utterly wrong as judiciary saying complain to JCIO. ask again for you Jack if they refuse to answer my question ,ask you to ask them please ,,,why I went day 1


They inform Ms Malagac that my allegations are delusionary,,,if delusionary ask them to inform you Jack in 7 days WHY DELUSINARY AND why I went to them day 1. As Insp O Mahony states in my complaint did not know if staff not sending applications to Denyer, or Denyer ignoring,,,,malfeasance in public office. The police know a criminal offence, malfeasance in public office, know judgement wrong,,,,take to JCIO , know via statute they could not investigate, and only a short time before over same offence their officers jailed [Erahami ]


CONCLUSION


a/ Can you please supply reply to complaint 1.6.2020 to Jack in7 days, eg what are allegations of antisocial behaviour,,,,how did you know i had parking pass, [WA S IT BIRD PLANTING EVIDENCE ON ME,,,PUTTING IN MY LETTER BOX,,,,STRANGE MANY LETTERS AT THIS TIME PUT THROUGH MY LETTER BOX CLEAR OUTSIDE 31 BIBURY STRANGE NOTHING SINCE]are you happy for cited antisocial behaviour of Bird to continue. [never thought of this as female barrister and judge stated,,,,in scan evidence 1 we cite PCBird...as barrister stated is he related in any way to your neighour Bird ,,,conflict of interest?????]


b/ Who made allegations of ,,,delusinary ,,,and can you cite events where come to this conclusion please




THE ISSUES TO POLICE


a/ Why did i come to you day 1 when barrister told me to make complaint when seen by Sgt Price

b/ Can we please have replies to complaints, where as in a/ the police attitude,,,,if we ignore correspondence he will go away, as of 1.6.2020 and 17.10.2020

c/ Can they confirm for media as in Ebrahimi case that in criminal /antisocial behaviour if you make complaint we will ignore.




ISSUE MAIN,,,,ARISES FROM CO/1731/2018 WHERE MASTER [level of judge] GIVES PERMISSION TO MAKE APPLICATION BACK TO THE COURT. NEED TO EXPLAIN TO MEDIA POLICE ARE DEFENDANTS AND COURTS [HMCS ] JUST A INTERESTED PARTY. THE COURTS AS SUCH LIKE RATS IN A SEWER SOMETIME AGO,SAY ,,,DO NOT REALLY WANT TO BE INVOLVED IN THIS ,,,,, COURT ASKED US IF WE WANT TO COMMENT ON EVIDENCE ,,,NO THIS IS ISSUE BETWEEN YOU AND POLICE….DO NOT AGREE ,,,,,,,,THE POLICE ALSO AT ALL STAGES MADE NO COMMENT TO THE COURT,,,,WHAT ARE ISSUES

POLICE [judiciary state A/ B/ vexatious however police in own words admit allegations, their correspondence before judiciary, this is identical as in Profuma affair, great interest of mine,,,,COLLUSION BETWEEN POLICE AND JUDICIARY]],

A/ THIS WAS A IPCC INVESTIGATION WHERE POLICE DID NOT FOLLOW IPCC REGULATIONS IN THIS SCAN EVIDENCE 1 INSP O MAHONY ADMITS WE DID NOT FOLLOW IPCC REGULATIONS

B/ IN EVIDENCE ,,,SCAN EVIDENCE 1 POLICE FURTHER ADMIT WE SENT REPLY TO YOUR APPEAL WHEN NO APPEAL LODGED. POLICE CORRESPONDENCE BEFORE 22.7.2017 STATES IF DOING AN APPEAL WE REQUIRE OUR OFFICIAL APPEAL FORM NO APPEAL FORM SENT TO 7.8.2017 WHERE POLICE/PCC MOUNTSTEVENS STATE WE WILL IGNORE APPEAL,,,,eg YOU HAVE NO EVIDENCE FOR YEARS BACK TO 2010 MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE THE COURTS IGNORING APPLICATIONS AND CORRESPONDENCE WHERE POLICE AND JUDICIARY HAVE COURT LETTER,,,,,WE IGNORED YOUR APPLICATIONS COME AND TALK TO US,,,

C/ THE ONLY OUTSTANDING ISSUE WHY I WENT TO POLICE DAY 1 ..[THEY ARE UTTERLY AWARE A MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE SO IGNORE REQUEST,,,,THIS REQUEST WAS MADE IN LIVE PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE Admin court and court of appeal, under,, CPR regulations PART 32 EVIDENCE

Notice to admit facts,,,,,why I came to you day 1

32.18

(1) A party may serve notice on another party requiring him to admit the facts, or the part of the case of the serving party, specified in the notice.,,,,,,,,,,,

which POLICE in questions ignored… ,IS THIS COMMON EVENT.....Mirojuhys v Latvia …………………fairness of proceedings always assessed by examining them in entirety that an isolated incident may not be sufficient to conclude proceedings as a whole unfair…. ,,,,,,isolated incident,,????consider complaint 1.6.2020 , 17.10.2020 please see details scan evidence 6 where after 6 months police ignore complaint

COURT [THE OMBUDSMAN SOLE ISSUE PLEASE SEE SCAN EVIDENCE 4]

A/ HHJCOTTER DID NOT READ APPLICATION OF THE 6.12.2917 ADMITTED BY JUDICIARY SEEK REFUND OF FEE

Jack sole issue that you have been involved with for years, NOW before ombudsman, refund of court fee as application of 6.12.2017 not read by HHJCotter.Simple question they refuse to answer in papers WAS APPLICATION 6.12.2017 READ BY HHJCOTTER I ASKED COURT ???????????

Jack must be first time do not know HMCS defense to ombudsman issue YOU DO NOT KNOW SO CAN NOT REFER UNTIL YOU KNOW COURTS STANCE. HAVE ASKED SAME QUESTIONS IN LIVE PROCEEDINGS AT JUDICIAL REVIEW AND COURT OF APPEAL STAGE TO COURTS ,,,UNDER

CPR regulations PART 32 EVIDENCE

Notice to admit facts

32.18

(1) A party may serve notice on another party requiring him to admit the facts, or the part of the case of the serving party, specified in the notice.,,,,,,,,,,,

which COURT in their questions ignored…Lets ask again with reply to you Jack in 7 days,with no reply Jack ask you to ask them. Coming to end of my life, these questions if need be answered in magistrates court, collecting 5L cans of old oil to throw in police station doorway before sent to prison to die,,,,severe heart condtion., simple surgery rejected Stress of arrest best result to expose corruption if die in police custody. Accept problem can I refer to your HISTORIC Mr Cobbs letter,,,,will write again to Bristol county court, Jack can not force them to reply. Further when ISSUE was in proceedings,POLICE in ,utter breach of Article 6 ignore correspondence

The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,,,,,,,,,

QUESTIONS

1/ WHY DID I COME TO YOU DAY 1 DO YOU HAVE ANY EVIDENCE I CAME AS SOLELY DISSATISFIED WITH JUDGEMENTS OF HHJDENYER IFYOU HAVE CAN YOU DISCLOSE TO JACK



SYNOPSIS

Have permission from Master [level of judge at court of appeal ] to make an application back to the court.

TODAY UNDER ECHR CASE LAW SEEK REPLY IN 7 DAYS FROM POLICE TO MY MP JACK LOPRESTI WITH COPY TO ME.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, FROM ECHR,,,

The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,]VERY SIMPLE QUESTION THE POLICE ELEMENT WHY DID I COME TO YOU DAY 1 SIMPLE QUESTION WAS IT MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE AS COURTS IGNORING APPLICATIONS AND CORRESPONDENCE FOR YEARS BACK TO 2010 ,AS JCIO STATE VIA STATUTE AS CRIMINAL OFFENCE WE COULD NEVER INVESTIGATE. OR WAS IT MALFREASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE AS SOLELY OVER THE YEARS I WAS ,,,,DISSATISFIED WITH JUDGEMENTS OF HHJDENYER. IF YOU HAVE EVIDENCE IT WAS DISSATISFIED WITH JUDGEMENTS OF HHJDENYER OVER YEARS COULD YOU PLEASE SUPPLY EVIDENCE TO MY MP JACK LOPRESTI ,IN 7 DAYS WITH EMAIL COPY TO ME,,,HAVE ASKED POLICE BEFORE WHILE IN PROCEEDINGS under



CPR 32 Notice to admit facts

32.18

(1) A party may serve notice on another party requiring him to admit the facts, or the part of the case of the serving party, specified in the notice.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

WHERE THEY IGNORED CORRESPONDENCE WHILE IN PROCEEDINGS ASK RECENTLY WHERE DEMAND MONEY TO ANSWER QUESTION, FINAL ELEMENT OF CASE REQUIRED THEN BACK TO COURT OF APPEAL. HAVE REMAINDING EVIDENCE IN POLICE OWN WORDS

FACTS

JUDICIARY ALLEDGE IT WAS VEXATIOUS TO MAKE ALLEGATIONS AGAINST POLICE, HOWEVER BECAUSE MADE RESTRAINING ORDER ISSUED, WHAT WERE ALLEGATIONS IN JUDICIAL REVIEW APPLICATION eg LETS QUOTE ACTUAL APLICATION






The Queen on the application of PHILIP JONES

Versus ,,,,CHIEF CONSTABLE AVON AND SOMERSET POLICE

SYNOPSIS ,,,SOLE ISSUE WHAT WE ARE ASKING CAN DEFENDANTS IGNORE STATUTORY IPCC REGULATIONS ON INVESTIGATION [grounds 1 in judicial review application page 4] AND WHEN AGAIN IN STATUTORY REGULATIONS I CAN APPPEAL,[grounds 2 in judicial application page 4/5] ,,,,SEND REPLY TO AN APPEAL I HAVE NOT LODGED. AS ONE LAWYER STATED WHERE ARE WE CHINA/RUSSIA.[IPCC state police inform us you lodged an appeal, only route a judicial review you will see in police letter they state you emailed us on the 22.7.2017 asking questions to do appeal,you stated WITH NO REPLY BY 28.7.2017 YOU WOULD ASSUME QUESTIONS WOULD NOT BE ANSWERED AND WOULD DO APPEAL ON/AFTER 28.7.2017. IN REPLY TO THAT EMAIL ,,,,24.7.2017 DEFENDANTS ALLEDGE THAT EMAIL 22.7.2017 WAS THE APPEAL]WHERE ARE WE CHINA/RUSSIA[end of quote judicial reriew]





JUDICIARY DEFINITION OF JUDICIAL REVIEW. It is not really concerned with the conclusions of that process and whether those were ‘right’, as long as the right procedures have been followed. The court will not substitute what it thinks is the ‘correct’ decision.Simple question were right procedures followed,



Can I refer as cited this further also was in judicial review application /pre action protocol document for judicial review [2017] ,,,, from local judge and barrister paper on malfeasance[misconduct ]in public office],


The elements [for offence] which can be extracted from the limited case law are: A public officer ,,,,,, Wilfully neglecting to perform her duty or wilfully misconducting herself ,,,,,,, To such a degree as to amount to an abuse of the public’s trust in the office holder ,,,,,, Without reasonable justification or excuse. Despite the criticism, there remains an appetite, at the Law Commission at least, to preserve an offence of misconduct in public office, or create a codified replacement. This appetite comes at least in part from recognition that the offence, at times, is the best description of the criminality involved: the public outrage comes not from the particular details of the misconduct, but from the sense of being wronged by an individual whose duty is to serve the public interest. . Kate Brunner QC

Have i been wronged by police ,,,correlate with actual judicial review application, in a IPCC investigation admit we did not follow IPCC ,regulations ,we never talked to you, admitted in scan 10594 and sent a reply to an appeal where admit one not lodged scan 10475 10494,,,eg we obtained your email 22.7.2017 where it stated with no answer to questions,to obtain evidence to do THE appeal you would do appeal on/after the 28.7.2017 EMAIL 22.7.2017 CAN NOT BE AN APPEAL AS POLICE MAINTAIN IN REPLY OF 24.7.2017



EVIDENCE BELOW WHERE POLICE IN OWN WORDS ADMIT APPLICATION THEY ADMIT WE DID NOT FOLLOW IPCC REGULATIONS AND SENT REPLY TO APPEAL WHERE ONE NOT MADE

This evidence below before judiciary, denying evidence before it, utter breach of Article 6 denying evidence before it,,,,,eg

Obligation incumbent on the administrative authorities: the appellant must have access to the relevant documents in the possession of the administrative authorities, if necessary via a procedure for the disclosure of documents (McGinley and Egan v. the United Kingdom, §§ 86 and 90). Were the respondent State, without good cause, to prevent appellants from gaining access to documents in its possession which would have assisted them in defending their case, or to falsely deny their existence, this would have the effect of denying them a fair hearing, in violation of Article 6 § 1 .....

WHAT ARE REGUATIONS OF IPCC IN THEIR INVESTIGATION

Regulations IPCC [independent police complaint commission] in a police investigation.,,,,sent to me ALSO CITED ON INTERNET

Contact to make sure have all details

Ask what you want to happen

Inform you what is likely to happen

Talk to you about way they will deal with your complaint

Let you know the outcome when they have finished , do in person or on phone ,BUT should also write to you

PLEASE SEE INSP O MAHONYS LETTER SCAN 10594 WHERE ADMIT POLICE NEVER TALKED TO ME eg DID NOT FOLLOW 1PCC REGULATIONS

LETS LOOK AT OTHER ALLEGATION IN JUDICIAL REVIEW APPLICATION,

Many years ago courts ignoring applications, and correspondence, had call one evening,,,,,well spoken male ,,,I do not approve of a one of your old applications to MY court,,,,[a district judge ?????] however will not stand by where corruption is going on HHJDenyer, and court out to get you, they have made a mistake, they have removed applications, however one in new case still on system in PRESENT case,,,,,,[8 years ago]. Visit court talk to Mr Blair,,,,recorded,,,all I state just checking to see applications in file,,,,,from recording ask nothing else,,,live case,,,we get reply,,,,nothing to do with me I check your applications, make sure you have evidence of being fee except,ect, and put in tray behind me,,,,,no one making allegations ,,,,is he responsible for removal of applications???. Is this not identical to Watergate,,,where Woodward/Bernsteine at Washington Post in deductions state we never asked about this, .....did not make any allegations the courts removing applications.However we know even later OBS80441 that applications, date/stamped by the court missing from file,,,,as at hearing a case I won, DJWatson states something very very odd here.

Courts for years ignoring applications and correspondence, pickit at court ,please see scan picket, barrister advised contacting police malfeasance in public office ignoring applications for many years, . WE HAVE CORRESPONDENCE FROM THE COURT WE IGNORED YOUR APPLICATIONS COME AND TALK TO US AND CITED LAWYER CORRESPONDENCE WHOSE ALSO CORRESPONDENCE WAS IGNORED , had document applications date/stamped by court ignored ect ect . Police state you have no evidence of malfeasance in public office,courts ignoring applications/correspondence,for years, from above evidence comes under Wednesbury unreasonableness,,,THEY HAVE COURT SAYING WE IGNORED YOUR APPLICATIONS. We have email from Mr Fowler [Bristol county court] in respect to statute CPR Part 32 Notice to Admit Facts ,,,,where he states your correspondence will not be read, not answered just filed, utter breach of Article 6,,,,,also

The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,]

From above nonsense stated to police in email 22.7.2017 you have come to judgement in IPCC investigation, , and have not followed IPCC regulations, when do you alledge you talked to me, asked further 11 questions eg ,,,have you talked to lawyer from above,,,,stating with no reply by the 28.7.2017 would assume there would be no reply and would then do appeal on/after the 28.7.2017. We then get police letter dated 24.7.2017 saying reply to your appeal I have made no appeal, waiting for reply to questions, the above history not in dispute can I refer to police letter scan 10475/10494,,,police admit,,,

eg,,You then emailed in reply 22.7.2017 and accused,,,,,,, of sweeping under the carpet…..You also said will assume with no email reply by 9.00 am 28.7.2017 there would be no reply and can do appeal to you.

SO SAYING POLICE DID NOT FOLLOW IN A IPCC INVESTIGATION IPCC REGULATIONS AND SENT REPLY TO AN APPEAL WHERE I HAVE NOT LODGED ONE ,,,,THE JUDICIARY STATE MY CLAIM VEXATIOUS,,,,THEREFORE ISSUE RESTRAINING ORDER WHERE BEFORE IT HAS ABOVE EVIDENCE WHERE POLICE ADMIT ALLEGATIONS WHERE ARE WE RUSSIA/CHINA,,,or is this like Profuma case collusion between police and judiciary.MY STATEMENTS TRUE ADMITTED BY POLICE,,lets consider a Crown court judge who saw my website,,,,stated not making any allegations however people in media may ask is this judiciary protecting their own

LETS CONSIDER WHY I WENT TO POLICE DAY 1

THE EVIDENCE





Can i refer to another female judge and barrister who saw my website www.corruptioninbristolcountycourt.com who stated in general there is cornerstone issue in case. Stated take theoretical example i sit as judge, defendant seen leaving bank after robbery, however case fails as defendant in closed prison on this date, your case why you went to police day 1. May seem strange however have sympathy with police, courts for years ignoring applications and correspondence, picket at court ,where barrister advises who i gave leaflet to, scanpicket to report to police malfeasance in public office courts ignoring applications for years and correspondence. Seen by Sgt Price where asked to paste CPS document on malfeasance in public office, and insert in it my complaint, the FEDJCAB complete document. Given by her then to PCBird, who contacts Bristol county court, where told not issue for police, only route a complaint to JCIO [judicial conduct investigation office]

This is where we have problem, under

The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,]

And in proceedings at all stages, eg HHJCotter/Admin court Cardiff/Court of appeal while in live proceedings parties as they frustrate and corrupt the judicial process just ignore all correspondence [police and HMCS]

CPR regulations PART 32 EVIDENCE

Notice to admit facts

32.18

(1) A party may serve notice on another party requiring him to admit the facts, or the part of the case of the serving party, specified in the notice.,,,,,,,,,,,


What did I ask, who at Bristol county court told PCBird to complain to JCIO. Playing Devils Advocate will we get it was HHJDenyers clerk,,,,where he will state,,,,remember getting call,,,,PCBird stated did not give me full allegations, only said Mr Jones was unhappy with conduct of Denyer,,,,I therefore informed PCBird therefore to complain to JCIO. WHAT DID PCBIRD INFORM THE COURT,,,,,WHO DID HE TALK TO. POLICE IGNORE UNDER CPR 32,,,,,WE DO NOT KNOW ANSWERS IS PCBIRD GOING TO SAY,,,,I TALKED TO X AT THE COURT EXPLAINED I HAD A COMPLAINT OF MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE YOU IGNORING APPLICATIONS FOR YEARS,,, WHERE TOLD NOTHING TO DO WITH COURT,,,,COMPLAIN TO JCIO. HOWEVER IF X AT COURT AWARE MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE AWARE CRIMINAL OFFENCE,,,THEN AWARE VIA STATUTE AS CRIMINAL OFFENCE COULD NOT COMPLAIN TO JCIO. LETS TAKE JUDICIARY STANCE FURTHER YOU WENT AS DISSATISFIED WITH SOLELY OVER JUDGEMENTS OF DENYER. AS FEMALE JUDGE AND BARRISTER STATED IN JUDGEMENT HHJCOTTER STATES,,,,,CRIMINAL OFFENCE,,,AND JUDICIARY STANCE,,, POLICE CORRECT TO ADVISE TO CONTACT JCIO. HOWEVER COTTER AWARE AS CRIMINAL OFFENCE COULD NOT REFER TO JCIO STATING YOU WENT AS ,,,,DISSATISFIED WITH JUDGEMENTS OF DENYER. IF THIS IS CASE POLICE WERE WRONG,,,AS FEMALE BARRISTER STATED,,,,IF YOU WENT AS DISSATISFIED WITH JUDGEMENTS OVER THE YEARS OF DENYER,,,,JCIO CAN DO NOTHING ABOUT THIS,,,AS STATUTE ONLY ROUTE TO APPEAL THESE JUDGEMENTS. FURTHER IF TRUE,,,AS FEMALE BARRISTER STATED,,,,YOU SHOULD HAVE BEEN SHOWN DOOR,,,,THIS WAS NOT EVEN CRIMINAL JUDGEMENTS THEY WERE CIVIL CASES,,,,POLICE CAN DO NOTHING ABOUT COURT JUDGEMENTS. FURTHER AS BARRISTER STATED WHY IS SGT PRICE WASTING POLICE TIME ASKING PCBIRD TO INVESTIGATE ALLEGATIONS ,,,,,,,I WAS UNHAPPY WITH VARIOUS CIVIL COURT JUDGEMENTS,,,AS SHE SAID SHOULD HAVE BEEN TOLD WE CAN DO NOTHING,,,,YOU NEED TO APPEAL BACK TO THE CIVIL COURT.





Was it malfeasance in public office as courts for years ignoring applications and correspondence ,a criminal offence, and via statute as they confirm JCIO we could never investigate complaint, as criminal offence, ,,,,judiciary state should have complained to JCIO. ?????? OR WENT TO POLICE AS SOLELY ......DISSATISFIED WITH PREVIOUS NUMEROUS JUDGEMENTS OF HHJDENYER,,,nonsence ????????????????

A STORY MADE UP BY HHJCOTTER TO CORRUPT AND FRUSTRATE THE JUDICIAL PROCESS ???????????? ask police today who did PCBird talk to ??







a/ Court for years ignoring applications and correspondence , picket at court SCAN picket, where barrister advised contacting defendants, criminal offence malfeasance in public office, record conversation with Sgt Price where agreed to send CPS document on malfeasance in public office and insert my complaint in terms of this CPS document. Defined the FEDJCAB complete document,[ Fatal Evidence Document Judiciary Corrupt And Bent.] eg




CPS in black DIRECT PASTE from their document , my comments were in red to Sgt Price ,eg why I went to police,,, this is subsection of FEDJCAB complete, defined just FEDJCAB eg,,,,, why I went to police



SCOPE OF OFFENCE,,,Misconduct in public office is an offence at common law ,,,,,,,office confined to those that are public office holders and is commited when the office holder acts or fails to act in a way that constitutes a breach of the duties of that office. ,,,,,,,he is judge HHJDenyer that deals with appeals, there is no doubt he failed to act when appeals/appication are sent to him to pervert the course of justice.[CAN I ADD SEE APPENDIX 2,,,,,used today same document title Appendix 2 for reference] DEFINITION OF OFFENCE wilfully neglects to perform his duty and/or wilfully misconduct himself ,,,,,,,,,he failed to perform his duty by ignoring my applications PUBLIC OFFICER ,,,,judges defined as officer,,,,,

ASKED DEFENDANTS WHILE IN LIVE PROCEEDINGS , TO CONFIRM ABOVE DOCUMENT WAS ONE SENT TO THEM eg WHY I WENT TO THEM,,,,UNDER,,

CPR 32 Notice to admit facts

32.18

(1) A party may serve notice on another party requiring him to admit the facts, or the part of the case of the serving party, specified in the notice.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,CORRESPONDENCE IGNORED ,,,

RECENTLY ASK AGAIN ,WAS THIS THE DOCUMENT SENT AS REQUESTED BY SGT PRICE WHERE DEFENDANTS DEMAND MONEY TO ANSWER QUESTION.



b/ Letter delivered by hand, Patchway police station,,,, receipt, please see scan 13.4.2017 eg what did i say,,,



,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

You have been supplied with CPS document on malfeasance in public office , where you asked to explain how it relates to my complaint. If you need more information please contact me, When picketing at court, as you know barrister told me to report to you malfeasance in public office, ignoring applications over many YEARS , as you stated would not be given to anyone to investigate if not a criminal offence, lawyer informs me a legal name its ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,misconduct in public office , where he informs me your officers jailed recently over this criminal offence , ,plus above perjury issue.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,



ASKED DEFENDANTS AGAIN IN LIVE PROCEEDINGS PLUS RECENTLY AS ABOVE WAS THIS THE DOCUMENT LETTER SENT AS REQUESTED BY SGT PRICE WHERE AS ABOVE DEFENDANTS DEMAND MONEY TO ANSWER QUESTION.







c/ The FEDJCAB in pre action protocol document for judicial review, served on parties on the 16.9.2017 . Further the pre action protocol document had to be produced via statute set paragraphs please see scan annexA for regulations eg paragraph 7 defined in Annex A scan the issue,,, NEED TO INFORM COURT OF ISSUE,,,what did I state…

paragraph 7/ THE ISSUE [from preaction protocol document]

BCC [Bristol county court ] for years ignoring applications, criminal offence malfeasance in public office, .resulting in one incident of miscarriage of justice. Complaint to defendants [POLICE] who refuse to investigate.

d/,,,,From pre action protocol statute document, give warning to HHJCotter,,,,,….eg



If practice of ignoring applications continues then next step, European court ECHR


StranGreek v Greece …………..a right to present which they regard as relevant .The right can only be seen to be effective if the observations are actually heard, that is to say considered by the court , have a duty to conduct a proper examination of arguments/evidence adducted by the parties,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Principle whereby a civil claim be capable of being submitted to a judge ranks as one of the universally recognised principles of law……………[FOR YEARS IGNORING APPLICATIONS] UNQUOTE


Above in email cited in MY note to Cotter 17.11.2017 via email, there were no emails to court, 14.11.2017 .In Cotters judgement states email 14.11.2017 where asking for nearly 3 years ,,,,is this cited email of 17.11.2017 ……………[FOR YEARS IGNORING APPLICATIONS],WHY I WENT TO POLICE,,,,where HMCS just ignore correspondence utter breach of Article 6. ....


The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,] and CPR 32,,,

They ignore as clear to Cotter why i went to police, day 1, and know Cotter read as quoted in his judgement. How does this bent judge go from,,,,[FOR YEARS IGNORING APPLICATIONS]........to DISSATISFIED WITH JUDGEMENTS OF HHJDENYER ???????????????????

e/ From ,,,, Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,,

ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS , ,,my court email of 21.12.2017

APPEAL AGAINST MR KROUWEL LETTER OF 5.12.2017



SKELETAL ARGUMENT


1/ Picketing at Bristol county court barrister told me to make complaint to police, malfeasance in public office, plus AGAIN perjury issue, warned police may try to brush you off.


2/ Clearly being brushed off by Sgt Price,, visit recorded,,,,,,,,,,,,,civil issues, make complaint to court, where I inform her I could not make a complaint.;;;;;;[CRIMINAL OFFENCE JCIO CAN NOT INVESTIGATE] tpld malfeasance not a criminal offence.stated on tape ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Where I state are you saying you refuse to investigate, where Sgt Price backs down, requests documents sent to her, eg CPS document, ,,,,,,,criminal offence, judges/police/courts convicted. [recently own police convicted Ibramahimi case]


3/Get reply from PCBird, ,,,,,I am investigating your allegations of malfeasance in public office, make complaint to HMCS, from 2/ aware I could not make a complaint. Accept i have been betrayed by Sgt Price, as wished to sweep under carpet as warned by barrister. .


4/ So complain to police, get reply from Mr Galloway,,,,,,advice was correct to complain to HMCS. Further states no evidence of malfeasance in public office, confirmed also by our third party.


5/ Statutory route to appeal. Asking police questions for appeal,,,,,,,,,,,,,,ISSUE NO EVIDENCE OF MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE. For example Galloway accepts in his letter ,,,, court order to make application ,,,,,, applications made to the court that were ignored, emailed on regular basis for reply to applications which court ignored, back to 2013, , I give evidence for example lawyers /MP also tried to get a reply to applications, which were ignored. Recording with court staff, admit applications made, which were ignored by the court. Have email from police saying if doing appeal need to enclose also our appeal claim form. Further asking police why statutory regulations of IPCC not followed in investigations, reference leaflet sent to me.


6/ On the 22.7.2017 send email as police ignoring request for data, can I quote end of that email,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,will assume with no email reply [to questions] by 9.00 am 28.7.2017 there will be no reply and can do appeal to you.h,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,



....

7/

77

Can I refer to female judge and barrister STATES ,,,,,HHJCotter was never going to grant your aplication,,,,turkeys voting for Xmas, inviting police in to investigate criminal behaviour,,,,,Cotter states you went to police as dissatisfied WITH JUDGEMENTS OF HHJDENYER, FROM ABOVE HOW DOES HE COME TO THIS JUDGEMENT,,,CORRUPT AND BENT MAKES UP STORY. AS RETIRED DISTRICT JUDGE STATED NOT JUDICIAL LANGUAGE HOWEVER CALLING THEM BASTARDS

There is at Bristol county court a [PSU] unit now know as Support Through Court ,[STC] visit with Ms Sell where manager at STC takes up issues with courts Mr Hunt. Agreed that Hunt he would confirm ,documents lodged with court, and therefore read by Cotter.[have copied STC into todays email if they want to comment to you Jack] ,so would know read by Cotter and considered,,, ,,,,,from Case Law ,,,Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,,

ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS , ,,,Hunt although promised to STC manager he would confirm, request ignored, take up issue with court manager Ms Pawsey,,,where we get IDENTICAL REPLY as one made by Fowler years ago,,,,your correspondence will not be read, not answered just filed,,,,utter breach as before of Article 6,The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],







f/ CAN I PLEASE CITE JUDICIAL REVIEW APPLICATION MARCH 2018

The issue with police ,,,,,,perjury issue [Eaga case] and court staff /judges ignoring applications, and correspondence, ignored,,,, McGinley v UK,,,,,,breach withholding documents which would have assisted with case...Ruiz-Mateus v Spain ,,,,,to have knowledge of and comment on all evidence adducted or observations filed... resulting in miscarriage of justice, perverting course of justice, In 2YJ03757 we know application made for oral hearing , from recording with Mr Blair at Bristol court office Mr Till sent to the Administration court Cardiff, he has court order to send to HHJDenyer did he ignore order, malfeasance in public office, or did he send to HHJDenyer who ignored, did Administration court obtain, we suggested to police could they get local police to obtain file, ,,,,we know lawyer could not get a oral hearing, we asked police,,,,,have you talked to lawyer, ,,,,have you talked to Pro Bono Unit, ,,,,,,please see details in text. .Are these chronic events, Mirojuhys v Latvia …………………fairness of proceedings always assessed by examining them in entirety [malfeasance in public office] that an isolated incident may not be sufficient to conclude proceedings as a whole unfair…. ,,,,,,consider even 2018 issues, where even today applications ignored……UNQUOTE



WE HAVE BENT AND CORRUPT HHJBIGGER COMING TO IDENTICAL WRONG JUDGEMENT as COTTERS.

Again as judge stated ,,,Bigger was never going to grant application turkeys voting for Xmas, inviting police in to investigate his courts criminal behaviour.

The application in judicial review was made to Admin court Birmingham , as for years Cardiff ignoring applications/correspondence also, made under Application Practice Directives 54d.5.2 ,. From Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,,

ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS , ,,the FEDJCAB complete document , the recording with Sgt Price , the pre action protocol for judicial review document sent to Birmingham court, no doubt why I went day 1 to police. I have asked under CPR directive 32.18 Notice to Admit Facts, NOW LIVE THEN IN ADMIN COURT ,,,Birmingham court , we have proof of posting sent, did you get,,,did you forward to Cardiff,,,,asked Cardiff court what documents were forwarded to your court from Birmingham, where both courts ignore correspondence, again utter breach of Article 6,The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,

A barrister who saw my website cited application in judicial review,,,,,,from above

Are these chronic events, Mirojuhys v Latvia …………………fairness of proceedings always assessed by examining them in entirety [malfeasance in public office] that an isolated incident may not be sufficient to conclude proceedings as a whole unfair…. ,,,,,,consider even 2018 issues, where even today applications ignored.

VERY CLEAR WHAT ISSUE IS WHAT DID I SAY IN JUDICIAL REVIEW APPLICATION,,,,,consider even 2018 issues, where even today applications ignored.,,,,,CONSIDER COTTERS JUDGEMENT ,,,,YOU WENT TO POLICE AS DISSATISFIED WITH JUDGEMENTS OF DENYER,,,,,HOWEVER AS BARRISTER SAID DENYER RETIRED IN 2017 SO ISSUE CAN NOT BE ,,,DISSATISFIED WITH JUDGEMENTS OF DENYER IN 2018 AS ISSUE STILL GOING ON IN 2018 CAN BE NOTHING TO DO WITH DENYERS JUDGEMENT HE WAS NOT AT COURT IN 2018. RETIRED

g/ Considers Biggers judgement , copy of Cotters judgement.

We already have police from above in own words admitting in this IPCC investigation we did not follow IPCC regulations, and sent reply to an appeal,,,,,you have no evidence of malfeasance in public office the courts for years ignoring applications/correspondence ,,,where we have court stating,,,,we ignored your applications come and talk to us. . We have one outstanding issue,,,,,why I went to police day 1,,,,

WILL USE SEVERAL TIMES CAN WE DEFINE TERM OETICARF ,,Overwhelming Evidence Tactically Ignore Correspondence As Reply Fatal

We have case where police are defendants and civil courts are interested party, police can not answer question,,,,,why did I come to you on day 1 , and court can not answer question ,,,,did HHJCotter read revised application of 6.12.2017 , made under Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS ,

As I state police can not reply , look at judgement of Bigger, IDENTICAL copy of Cotters judgement went to police malfeasance in public office as courts for many years ignoring applications and correspondence.FROM ABOVE DID NOT GO AS DISSATISFIED WITH JUDGEMENTS OF DENYER From judicial review application seek evidence to do judicial review application,,

This evidence above before judiciary, eg FEDJCAB document, denying evidence before it, utter breach of Article 6 denying evidence before it,,,,why I went to police day1 ,eg

Obligation incumbent on the administrative authorities: the appellant must have access to the relevant documents in the possession of the administrative authorities, if necessary via a procedure for the disclosure of documents (McGinley and Egan v. the United Kingdom, §§ 86 and 90). Were the respondent State, without good cause, to prevent appellants from gaining access to documents in its possession which would have assisted them in defending their case, or to falsely deny their existence, this would have the effect of denying them a fair hearing, in violation of Article 6 § 1 .....

COTTER/BIGGER DENYING EVIDENCE BEFORE THEM.

Visit court 5.12.2017 Mr Blair states your not looking at files, showing us ignoring your applications, make application to Cotter who will also ignore application . Could not do judicial review application as evidence withheld, ,LOOK AT JUDICIAL REVIEW APPLICATION IGNORING APPLICATIONS FOR YEARS STILL GOING ON IN 2018 BY COTTER. , where Jack I contacted your office, copy to Cotter, where he now replies scancotterlate, utterly aware out of time to do judicial review application HOWEVER withheld evidence,,,, The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],

We ask police series of questions where they demand money to answer, so comprimise,,,,,,why did I come to you day 1,,,,,do you have any evidence I came solely as dissatisfied with judgements of Denyer, if you do please supply. We ask police again simple question, could you copy Jack into reply in 7 days. PCC Ms Mountstevens copied today,,,,we have miscarriage of justice we ask you [PCC] to ensure police answer question. With no reply in 7 days I ask you Jack to ask police,before taking matter into my own hands.

FURTHER CONSIDERATION WITH POLICE

1/ When in a difficult position just ignore applications eg complaint 1.6.2020 after nearly 6 months no reply , complaint 17.10.2020 also ignored, and further details in scan evidence 6

CONCLUSION

1/ I am asking State to provide Legal Aid, to remove restraining order, from statute from day 1 of order, have to inform police and courts if they have any objections to removal of COURT OF APPEAL order, where non issued,no objection , if they have now Jack ask them in 7 days to inform you Jack. SO ASKING FOR REMOVAL WHERE PARTIES HAVE NO OBJECTION TO REMOVAL.The police and PCC Ms Mountstevens have duty of care to ensure that money is not wasted. If you have evidence in 7 days to oppose application back to the court, inform Jack and me in 7 days please. At all stages Cotter/Admin court/court of appeal,,,police via statute had chance to DISPUTE FACTS OF my application,,,eg acknowledgement of service and todays application to remove restraining order,,,at court of appeal where police made no objection. As female barrister/judge stated if they did Legatt LJ in mood he was in would have awarded costs against you, AS TIME SPENT Can I refer to Leggatt LJ judgement , and correspondence to police to inform me if they objected to application back to the court,,,,todays issue . There was no objection,,,however accept today Jack police/Mountstevens may raise objections, of return to the court, where ask them to inform you in 7 days, with copy of email to me please, why they object to application, need to show EVEN POLICE DO NOT OBJECT TO TODAYS APPLICATION. WHERE SEEK LEGAL AID

2/ What was judgement,,,,,,I went to police day 1 as SOLELY ,,,,,malfeasance in public office as dissatisfied with judgements of Denyer,,,,is this correct,,,WE ASK POLICE,,,if so can you please supply evidence to Jack, Talked to female barrister and judge,,,compelling evidence above, plus as Insp O Mahony states you did not know if criminal offence malfeasance in public office ignoring applications for years, by court staff not sending applications to Denyer, or Denyer just ignoring. As judge stated court staff have nothing to do with,,,judgements of Denyer,,,so court issue can not be you went day 1 as dissatisfied with judgements of Denyer, judgements of Denyer nothing to do with court staff.

3/ SIMPLE QUESTION WE HAVE RESTRAINING ORDER AS ALLEGATIONS VEXATIOUS AGAINST POLICE WHERE POLICE IN OWN WORDS ADMIT ALLEGATIONS,,,,SHOWS CORRUPTION PLUS UTTER BREACH OF ECHR CASE LAW,,,,BY COTTER/BIGGER/LEGATT,,,,,,,,,,,,, eg ,,,,or to falsely deny their existence, this would have the effect of denying them a fair hearing, in violation of Article 6 § 1 .....THEY HAVE POLICE ADMITTING IN OWN WORDS,,,,AS JUDGE SAID IS THIS JUDICIARY [LEGATT] PROTECTING THEIR OWN. JUST ONE OUTSTANDING QUESTION,,,,YES JUST ONE ASKING FOR YEARS EVEN IN LIVE PROCEEDINGS UNDER

CPR 32 Notice to admit facts

32.18

(1) A party may serve notice on another party requiring him to admit the facts, or the part of the case of the serving party, specified in the notice.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,CORRESPONDENCE IGNORED ,,

,DID I COME TO YOU DAY 1 COMPELLING EVIDENCE ABOVE MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE AS FOR YEARS THE COURTS IGNORING APPLICATIONS AND CORRESPONDENCE .;;;;or was itsolely as ,,,,dissatisfied with judgements of Denyer.As female barrister/judge stated,,,,you have asked police was the FEDJCAB document sent to police,,,,was this in the pre action protocol document for judicial review,,,,shows why you went day 1,,,,,police may say, as judge said i work on facts,,,not documents he sent,,,he sent,,,,police can answer if they want, not asking today,,,,, JUST ONE QUESTION WAS IT MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE IGNORING CORRESPONDENCE AND APPLICATIONS FOR YEARS,,,AND THEREFORE VIA STATUTE COULD NOT TAKE TO JCIO.

FURTHER CONSIDER TODAY QUESTIONS IN SCAN EVIDENCE 6


SCAN EVIDENCE 2 THE LEGAL AID STATUTE

JACK YOU WILL NEED EVIDENCE TO REFER TO Rt Hon BUCKLAND AND OMBUDSMAN

What is issue, please see SCAN EVIDENCE 1 AND 4 ,,,,, where we ask State to provide Legal Aid .We have asked lawyers [x100] for years, told by one lawyer,,,,, lawyers will not want to act due to content, you will be brushed off by others, eg they will say too busy, no one on facts, can reject your cry for help , from email reply ,,,,,firms public law lawyers not free to act at present, ,,,,,,,,,,LATER in day, ,call is your public law lawyers taking on new work,,,,,yes ,,,,,, can I put you through ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,contact Bristol Law Center at pre judicial review stage, Jack you are aware in email to you, lawyers and this centre covered in email today , asking for help. In recent request have reply from Bristol Law Centre ,,,,,,,told you last time not taking on new work,,,,, we may so ask why they have website, if for 2 years,,,,,,not taking on work, covered in this email if they want to comment to you Jack . Similar with Pro Bono Unit [London] will not now use them. Badly let down, even later again at court of appeal stage. They were asking court of appeal for more time, court of appeal were understanding, believe they gave 4 extensions to do application, at end court of appeal stated this is final extension, the email sent to Pro Bono Unit . WE GET REPLY AFTER THIS FINAL DATE saying could not find suitable barrister, good job I took advice of retired district judge ,advised do initial application ,can add further evidence to do full application your self,under,,,,, Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS ,,which was done,,,why i went to police day 1, police admit in this IPCC investigation we did not follow IPCC regulations, we sent replyto your alleged appeal, where we admit appeal not lodged. Retired judge,, I will not do I have retired, so you can lodge with court of appeal on time, as let down by Pro Bono Unit ,,,,at last minute have to serve incomplete application, state to court of appeal ,,,,appeal as at 1.7.2018 with application to Legatt LJ to make order so I could obtain further evidence, please see scan 10547, which he ignored, utter breach of Article 6,,,, The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,Jack understand you know legal worker Dr Gupta where raised issue,,,NOT making any allegations , states I did send email to you,,,can not trace,,,could well have gone from his records, if still have ask him to forward to you in 7 days. JACK I PLEASE ASK ,,,,, State to provide Legal Aid. . What are my Human Rights, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,skeletal argument below…

WHAT IS THE HUMAN RIGHT ISSUE IN RESPECT TO LEGAL AID ,,,,,,,,,,,,

C. Legal aid

1. Granting of legal aid

However, the Convention is intended to safeguard rights which are practical and effective, in particular the right of access to a court. Hence, Article 6 § 1 may sometimes compel the State to provide for the assistance of a lawyer when such assistance proves indispensable for an effective access to court (Airey v. Ireland, § 26).


However, the right in question is not absolute and it may therefore be permissible to impose conditions on the grant of legal aid based in particular on the following considerations, in addition to those cited in the preceding paragraph:

the financial situation of the litigant (Steel and Morris v. the United Kingdom, § 62);

his or her prospects of success in the proceedings (ibid).




a/ ,,,,Right and access to a court 81. The right of access to a court for the purposes of Article 6 was defined in Golder v. the United Kingdom (§§ 28-36). Referring to the principles of the rule of law and the avoidance of arbitrary power which underlie the Convention, the Court held that the right of access to a court was an inherent aspect of the safeguards enshrined in Article 6 (Zubac v. Croatia [GC], §§ 76 et seq.). 82. The right to a fair trial, as guaranteed by Article 6 § 1, requires that litigants should have an effective judicial remedy enabling them to assert their civil rights (Běleš and Others v. the Czech Republic, § 49; Naït-Liman v. Switzerland [GC], § 112). 83. Everyone has the right to have any claim relating to his “civil rights and obligations” brought before a court or tribunal. In this way Article 6 § 1 embodies the “right to a court”, of which the right of access, that is, the right to institute proceedings before courts in civil matters, constitutes one aspect (Golder v. the United Kingdom, § 36; Naït-Liman v. Switzerland [GC], § 113). Article 6 § 1 may therefore be relied on by anyone who considers that an interference with the exercise of one of his or her civil rights is unlawful and complains that he or she has not had the possibility of submitting that claim



  • b/ A right that is practical and effective . The right of access to a court must be “practical and effective” (Bellet v. France, § 38; Zubac v. Croatia [GC], §§ 76-79). For the right of access to be effective, an individual must “have a clear, practical opportunity to challenge an act that is an interference with his rights” (Bellet v. France, § 36; Nunes Dias v. Portugal (dec.)



c/ In the specific circumstances of a case, the practical and effective nature of the right of access to a court may be impaired, for instance: by the prohibitive cost of the proceedings in view of the individual’s financial capacity:….


Stankov v. Bulgaria, § 5 the Court held that substantial court fees imposed at the end of proceedings could also amount to a restriction on the right to a court.



d/ . In examining the proportionality of a restriction of access to a civil court, the Court takes into account the procedural errors committed during the proceedings which prevented the applicant from enjoying such access, and determines whether the applicant was made to bear an excessive burden on account of such errors. Reference criteria have been laid down for assessing whether it is the applicant or the competent authorities who should bear the consequences of any errors (Zubac v. Croatia [GC], §§ 90-95, § 119). Where errors were made before

e/ Content: civil claims must be capable of being submitted to a judge (Fayed v. the United Kingdom, § 65; Sabeh El Leil v. France [GC], § 46).,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,


FACTS


The judicial review application, fee except, at end of proceedings State issue restraining order ,solely as I appealed ,JUDGEMENT UTTERLY WITHOUT MERIT [IN SCAN EVIDENCE 1 POLICE ADMIT APPLICATION,,IN THIS IPCC INVESTIGATION WE DID NOT FOLLOW IPCC REGULATIONS AND WE SENT REPLY TO YOUR APPEAL WHERE WE ADMIT ONE NOT LODGED,,,,YOU HAVE FURTHER IN THIS DOCUMENT WHY I WENT TO POLICE DAY 1 WHERE TODAY ASK POLICE TO CONFIRM WHY I WENT TO THEM DAY 1] ,seek to remove order the court demands money, utter breach ,,,, Stankov v. Bulgaria, § 5 the Court held that substantial court fees imposed at the end of proceedings could also amount to a restriction on the right to a court.,,,,,the judiciary make order knowing I do not have money to appeal..as they corrupt and frustrate the judicial process, another issue the Court takes into account the procedural errors committed during the proceedings,,,,,,consider application that Legatt ignored and follow up correspondence scan10547 , where in utter breach of Article 6,,, ,The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,, Legatt just ignored application.


I have fundamental basic rights of access to a court , however can not do due to the financial situation of the litigant (Steel and Morris v. the United Kingdom, § 62); We have Master [level of judge at Court of Appeal] confirming he would accept application however demanding 528.00 to hear application.,,,nearly my pension for a month,,,, I am a pensioner can not afford that money. Of course I can not expect State to give Legal Aid where little or no prospect of success. What was application in judicial review, pasted in scan evidence 1 today, , untouched , eg as lawyer stated quoted in application ,,,,, where are we Russia /China, We have retired district judge saying not judicial language however calling HHJCotter and his court staff bastards, as in Profuma case collusion between court and police.


We have Avon Somerset Police ADMITTING IN OWN WORDS


a/ IN THIS IPCC INVESTIGATION WE ADMIT WE DID NOT FOLLOW IPCC REGULATIONS


b/ We sent reply to your appeal where we admit one not lodged


c/ We have just one outstanding issue,,,,why I went to police day 1 , where ask police to confirm, we know as female barrister and judge stated who saw my website,,police ignore,,,,,,would be turkeys voting for Xmas, they ignore, asking for years, also question served under live proceedings, Admin court/court of appeal


CPR regulations PART 32 EVIDENCE

Notice to admit facts

32.18

(1) A party may serve notice on another party requiring him to admit the facts, or the part of the case of the serving party, specified in the notice.,,,,,,,,,,,

which POLICE in questions ignored…Lets ask again with reply to you Jack in 7 days,with no reply Jack ask you to ask them. Coming to end of my life, these questions if need be answered in magistrates court, collecting 5L cans of old oil to throw in police station doorway before sent to prison to die,,,,severe heart condtion.,rejected simple correction surgery. Accept problem can I refer to your HISTORIC Mr Cobbs letter,,,,will write again to Bristol county court, Jack can not force them to reply. Further when ISSUE in proceedings,POLICE in ,utter breach of Article 6 ignore correspondence

The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,,,,,,,,,

I ASK TODAY WHY DID I COME TO YOU DAY 1 WAS IT MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE THE COURTS FOR YEARS IGNORING APPLICATIONS [DID NOT KNOW IF HHJDENYER OR WAS IT COURT STAFF NOT SENDING APPLICATIONS/ CORRESPONDENCE TO HIM,,,]THIS IN INSP O MAHONY ENCLOSED REPLY SCAN 10594 OR WAS IT MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE AS,,,,,,DISSATISFIED OVER THE YEARS OF JUDGEMENTS OF HHJDENYER,,,,IF THIS IS STANCE CAN YOU SEND EVIDENCE TO JACK LOPRESTI MP AND COPY ME INTO REPLY IN 7 DAYS PLEASE.






SCAN EVIDENCE 4 THE OMBUDSMAN ISSUE REFUND OF COURT FEE



SCAN EVIDENCE 4 OMBUDSMAN ISSUE

THIS IS PART OF EMAIL TO JACK LOPRESTI MP ,,,SHOULD BE CONSIDERED WITH FULL EMAIL THE REST OF EMAIL CAN BE FOUND IN WWW.CORRUPTIONINBRISTOLCOUNTYCOURT.COM. SPECIFIC ELEMENT SCAN EVIDENCE 4 ONLY SENT TO THE COURT TODAY ……THEIR SOLE ISSUE

ISSUE ARISES FROM CO/1731/2018 WHERE MASTER [level of judge] GIVES PERMISSION TO MAKE APPLICATION BACK TO THE COURT. NEED TO EXPLAIN TO MEDIA POLICE ARE DEFENDANTS AND COURTS [HMCS ] JUST A INTERESTED PARTY. THE COURTS AS SUCH LIKE RATS IN A SEWER SOMETIME AGO,,,,DO NOT REALLY WANT TO BE INVOLVED THIS IS ISSUE BETWEEN YOU AND POLICE….DO NOT AGREE ,,,,,,,,WHAT ARE ISSUES

POLICE [judiciary state A/ B/ vexatious however police in own words admit allegations]

A/ THIS WAS A IPCC INVESTIGATION WHERE POLICE DID NOT FOLLOW IPCC REGULATIONS IN SCAN EVIDENCE 1 INSP O MAHONY ADMITS WE DID NOT FOLLOW IPCC REGULATIONS

B/ IN EVIDENCE ,,,SCAN EVIDENCE 1 POLICE FURTHER ADMIT WE SENT REPLY TO YOUR APPEAL WHEN NO APPEAL LODGED

C/ THE ONLY OUTSTANDING ISSUE WHY I WENT TO POLICE DAY 1 THIS COVERED IN SCAN EVIDENCE 1 WITH DETAILED EVIDENCE NO NEED TO REPEAT HERE

COURT [THE OMBUDSMAN SOLE ISSUE]

A/ HHJCOTTER DID NOT READ APPLICATION OF THE 6.12.2917 SEEK REFUND OF FEE

Jack sole issue that you have been involved with for years, NOW hope before ombudsman, refund of court fee as application of 6.12.2017 not read by HHJCotter.Simple question they refuse to answer WAS APPLICATION 6.12.2017 READ BY HHJCOTTER ???????????

Jack must be first time do not know HMCS defense to ombudsman issue YOU DO NOT KNOW SO CAN NOT REFER UNTIL YOU KNOW COURTS STANCE. HAVE ASKED SAME QUESTIONS IN LIVE PROCEEDINGS AT JUDICIAL REVIEW AND COURT OF APPEAL STAGE TO POLICE AND COURTS ,,,UNDER

CPR regulations PART 32 EVIDENCE

Notice to admit facts

32.18

(1) A party may serve notice on another party requiring him to admit the facts, or the part of the case of the serving party, specified in the notice.,,,,,,,,,,,

which HMCS in their questions I asked …. ignored…Lets ask again with reply to you Jack in 7 days,with no reply Jack ask you to ask them. Coming to end of my life, these questions if need be answered in magistrates court, collecting 5L cans of old oil to throw in court doorway before sent to prison to die,,,,severe heart condtion. Best outcome to die in police custody after arrest to show what is going on. Accept problem can I refer to your HISTORIC Mr Cobbs letter,,,,will write again to Bristol county court, Jack can not force them to reply. Further when ISSUE in proceedings,CPR 32,,,,IGNORE,,,,COURT ALSO in ,utter breach of Article 6 ignore correspondence

The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,,,,,,,,,

SKELETAL ARGUMENT OF ISSUE

Have restraining order as i appealed HHJCotters/Biggers identical wrong judgement. Stated vexatious to make allegations against police, in scan evidence 1 in own words police admit allegations made. The appeal stands on its own, however in judgement it states facts of case in Cotters judgement, however did Cotter read application,FROM BELOW TOLD HE DID NOT READ,,,,,,,,.READ WRONG PAPERS,,,,application HE MADE ????? FORGERY,

1/November 2017 send court N244 form plus note to HHJCotter where he asks me to make official application and to pay fee, Visit court 5.12.2017 to obtain evidence to do application to the court, The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,,,,,,,,,,eg where lady was more than helpful went to get files, then Mr Blair comes running out saying, your not looking at files, we refuse WHO IS WE ,,HHJCOTTER

opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,,,,,,,,,,Blair,,,make application to Cotter who will also ignore request utter breach of Article 6.which Cotter did,,

2/Demand old N244 form deface write on it not to be sent to Cotter until new N244 send with application next day, 6.12.207,,,made under ,,,,,,,,,,,,,Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS ,,PAID FEE ON THESE CONDITIONS ,,,,, application sent next day via email.,6.12.2017

3/ Series of emails confirming agreement,,,,,Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS for example 7.12.2017

In application yesterday requested that page one of N244 lodged previously was removed and replaced with document sent to you yesterday. Can you please confirm done. IGNORED emails,,,


5.12.2017 timed 16.17 court receipt 16.17

6.12.2017 timed 15.33 15.35 15.45 court receipt same time

7.12.2017 timed 9.58 court receipt 9.59

21.12.2017 timed 11.00 court receipt 11.00.

29.12.2017 timed 4.22 know court had as HHJCotter admits he read as made under Adorisio,,,,,.

Visit court again asking same questions, talk to manager of PSU [known now support through court] who talks to courts Mr Hunt, where Hunt lies to PSU manager states will confirm in 10days if above LISTED EMAILS/ TIME in file, for example application of 6.12.2017 under ,,,,Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS IS IT IN FILE.

AGAIN BELOW UTTER BREACH OF ARTICLE 6 MS PAWSLEY REFUSES EVEN TODAY TO ANSWER QUESTION HUNT STATED TO PSU HE WOULD ANSWER AS HUNT CORRUPTS AND FRUSTRATE THE JUDICIAL PROCESS. JUST LIED TO PSU

4/ For example from application 6.12.2017 and other emails utterly aware why i went to police day 1, as retired District Judge stated after seeing Cotters judgement,,,,,not judicial language however they are utter bastards, he did not read application, visit court,,,,told we did not send to Cotter,removed from file. If did not send what was N244 form sent to Cotter, one Blair/Cotter made up and forged my signature,,,asked for copy of defaced N244 form plus one considered by Cotter, of course if Cotter forged my signature you can see why court ignored my request, under ,,The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,,,,,,,,,and in live proceedings before Admin court and court of appeal under,,,

CPR regulations PART 32 EVIDENCE

Notice to admit facts

32.18

(1) A party may serve notice on another party requiring him to admit the facts, or the part of the case of the serving party, specified in the notice.,,,,,,,,,,,

5/ Told not read, Jan 2018,,,seek refund of court fee, stages complain,,,to Resolver,,,to ombudsman. Court refuses to repay fee only thing we get which QC female judge and barrister stated is intelectual insolence they state we looked in fee section of 6.12.2017 no fee was paid,,,NO FEE REQUIRED FROM ECHR CASE LAW under ,,,,Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS

QUESTIONS

1/ DID HHJCOTTER READ APPLICATION OF THE 6.12.2017

NO,,,,,SEEK REFUND OF COURT FEE

YES….THEN NO APPLICATION TO OMBUDSMAN eg HE READ APPLICATION ,,,,HOWEVER AWARE WHY I WENT TO POLICE DAY 1 SO HE IS DENYING EVIDENCE BEFORE HIM egHE HAS FEDJCAB DOCUMENT THE DOCUMENT POLICE WANTED DAY 1 EXPLAINING MY COMPLAINT

Obligation incumbent on the administrative authorities: the appellant must have access to the relevant documents in the possession of the administrative authorities, if necessary via a procedure for the disclosure of documents (McGinley and Egan v. the United Kingdom, §§ 86 and 90). Were the respondent State, without good cause, to prevent appellants from gaining access to documents in its possession which would have assisted them in defending their case,or to falsely deny their existence, this would have the effect of denying them a fair hearing, in violation of Article 6 § 1 .....

2/ BASIC QUESTION DID YOU GET APPLICATION EMAIL OF THE 6.12.2017 MADE UNDER ,,,,,,,,,,,Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS ,,

YES SO YOU OBTAINED APPLICATION

NO,,,,JACK I CAN SEND COURT RECEIPTS IF THIS IS COURT DEFENCE

3/ Or is defence we will not pay as no fee sent on the 6.12.2017 then via statute in 2/ no fee is required via Case Law. Only reply we have obtained is ,,,,,,,,,, I didn’t find evidence of a properly filed application, with a fee, dated 6 December 2017.,,,,,from statute no fee required. The courts could have resolved issue as I stated in live proceedings at Admin and court of appeal stage eg

Notice to admit facts

32.18

(1) A party may serve notice on another party requiring him to admit the facts, or the part of the case of the serving party, specified in the notice.,,,,,,,,,,,

However all correspondence ignored , tried recently please see court reply as Pawsley corrupts and frustrates the judicial process I ASK AGAIN ANSWER QUESTIONS

Bristol County, E-Filing <e-filing.bristol.countycourt@justice.gov.uk>

23/06/2020 17:19

1

Inbox

Dear Mr Jones

Thank you for your correspondence received in our office on 5 June 2020. Please accept my apologies for the delay in response but I did not have sight of your email until last week due to national issues with our IT equipment.

You have written to the court on several occasions to both myself and Mr Edward Hunt on this very matter. We have previously addressed the questions put to us and we have nothing new we can usefully add.

Any further correspondence in relation to this matter will not be responded to, but will be placed on your file.

Yours sincerely


Jane Pawsey



As you can see again going back to proceedings in Admin /court of appeal just ignore correspondence utter breach of Article 6

The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,,,,,,,,,,

Jack simple question to them did you get application 6.12.2017 as AGREED with court [Blair] under,,, Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS ,,WAS IT READ BY HHJCOTTER. WAS COTTER AWARE OF APPLICATION UNDER ADORISIO ,,YES HE WAS FROM JUDGEMENT

CAN I PLEASE ADDRESS ONLY REPLY WE HAVE FROM Mr Redgrave please see scan redgrace,,,,

I didn’t find evidence of a properly filed application, with a fee, dated 6 December 2017.UNDER CASE LAW NO FEE REQUIRED eg Adorisio,,, ,,, Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,,

CAN I PLEASE ADDRESS REDGRAVES REPLY IN TOTAL AS SHOWS UTTER CORRUPTION OF HMCS COTTER AND REDGRAVE what does he omitAs for years ignoring applications and correspondence ,back to 2010 my website launched, www.corruptioninbristolcountycourt.com . The court asks for removal of website or CONSEQUENCES I WILL NOT BE BLACKMAILED BY CORRUPT AND BENT JUDGE DENYER . Emails stored on Outlook express, not in cloud, need to back up , due to possible litagation over libel. For example courts Mr Fowler called corrupt and bent, trying to get evidence to do HISTORIC judicial review, where he states ,,,,,your letters will not be answered , not read, just filed.....utter breach of Article 6, of the Human Rights Act ,,,,,, [IDENTCAL TO PAWSLEYS LETTER AS THEY CORRUPT AND FRUSTRATE THE JUDICIAL PROCESS] The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,,

Compuwave take on work to back up emails. On invoice they give program to view backuped emails. Program does not work , where Compuwave state was working when you left shop. B26YM042 issued, comes to arbitration , starts late, where parties agree to settle later. AGREED ABOVE FACTS CONFIRMED WITH SCAN REDGRAVE HOWEVER REDGRAVE OMITS FOLLOWING,,,,AS HE CORRUPTS AND FRUSTRATES THE JUDICIAL PROCESS. ,The settlement sent to court, matter settled, wrong program was given on invoice,note Compuwave covered in this document TODAY , if facts not correct ask them to email you Jack. DJWatson asks what was position of person at Compuwave who signed settlement , this emailed to DJWatson by Compuwave, email copy to me, please see COURTS FILE history, however from scan Redgrave can i just add one email that Redgrave omitted from his history,,,as he corrupts and frustrates the judicial process,,,the email settlement to court .....





PHILIP JONES <philip.jones88@btinternet.com>

23/12/2015 09:59

12

5

Scan10246.JPG



CLAIM NUMBER B26YM042 HEARING 5.1.2016



Could you please put before a judge as soon as possible, to vacate hearing 5.1.2016. I accept as in AOIBS346 Jones v N Bristol NHS Trust , for medical records, DJBrittan would not accept settlement and told both parties to attend court. This again was a settlement request from defendants a few days before second hearing, and i informed hospital lawyer, that settlement was nonsense, however they now give me everything requested from day 1. [identical today]



In todays issue, from tab 4 these instructions to read emails are utterly different from instructions given 21.12.2015, from tab 6 my email to defendants, where asked if tab 4 correct, which obtained no reply, as defendants ignored email, proceedings issued. Again a few days before hearing defendants ask to settle, as court aware no papers 14 days before hearing by defendants. ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,UNQUOTE



RECEIPT therefore obtained by Bristol county court…below



Bristol County, E-Filing <e-filing@bristol.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk>

23/12/2015 09:59

1

Your email has been safely received by the Bristol County Court

We will endeavour to process or respond to your email within 5 working days. However please note that if your document requires referral to a Judge you may not get a reply for up to 15 working days.

If your email is regarding a complaint, please allow 10 working days for your concerns to be investigated and a response provided. For further guidance please refer to the EX343 on the Justice Website.

Top Tips





As Redgrave HMCS states in scanredgrave , due to mediation starting late , I recorded mediation , agreed would settle after mediation, settlement sent scan 10246 attached to above email, above with court receipt,,,,obtained above by court ,,,,. Heard nothing so recorded call to court ,,,ask ,do I have to go to hearing over settled claim, ,,,, we have asked HHJDenyer to remove from hearing date. from above settled, told HHJDenyer removed case from hearing list , matter settled, no need to attend hearing ,,,,,, consider now Denyers deception and corruption, , where of course no one turns up, therefore case was dismissed .Appeal for oral hearing matter settled ,,,, send recorded delivery , copy of tape sent , not to turn up,, see signed for, where appeal application dismissed corrupting and frustrating the judicial process, as scan Redgrave states. . MATTER SETTLED. NOW SEE WHAT BLACKMAIL THREAT CONSEQUENCES MEANT AS RESTAINING ORDER ISSED AS I APPEALED JUDGEMENT BUT THIS IS A SETTLED CASE BETWEEN PARTIES WERE TOLD NOT TO COME TO HEARING,,,,WALKED INTO A TRAP,,,,,DO WE HAVE IDENTICAL SITUATION TODAY RESTRAING ORDER UTTERLY WITHOUT MERIT





JACK DO NOT WANT TO WASTE YOUR TIME COURT TODAY MAY SAY,,,I HAVE BEEN ASKING FOR YEARS ,,,,,APPLICATION 6.12.2017 WAS READ ,,,NO REFUND OF FEE,,,SO IT WAS READ SO COTTER KNOWS WHY I WENT TO POLICE DAY1 ,,MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE IGNORING CORRESPONDENCE AND APPLICATIONS FOR YEARS eg 6.12.2020 EMAIL

CONTACT PHILIP.JONES88@BTINTERNET.COM

This section expands issues in 2016, however the MAIN issue , same issue ignoring applications relate to 2013 issue.

We have response from Sg Price ,Avon Somerset Police ,,,,, insufficient evidence, malfeasance in public office defined by CPS as,,,,,,,,,,,,,wilfully neglecting to perform their duty,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, We have court order to make applications to the Bristol county court, where court/HHJDenyer ignores, wilfully neglecting to perform their duty,,,,,malfeasance in public office. Court confirms orally they will commit malfeasance in public office told HHJDenyer had confimed applications would be ignored, ..............................

IS THIS NOT INFORMING COTTER,,,MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE AS APPLICATIONS BEING IGNORED

A/ THERE IS DOCUMENT 6.12.2017 DEFINED DOCUMENT TITLE SEEKING PERMISSION TO REMOVE RESTRAINING ORDER,,,NOT ADDRESED IN JUDGEMENT SO WAS READ ?????COTTER WHERE IS YOUR JUDGEMENT ON APPLICATION ???????

B/ ,,,DOCUMENT 6.12.2017 ,,,,REQUESTED BY POLICE DAY 1 [feb 2017]THE FEDJCAB DOCUMENT COPIED AGAIN BEFORE IN PRE ACTION PROTOCOL DOCUMENT, FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW,,,AGAIN BEFORE COTTER

CPS in black DIRECT PASTE from their document , my comments were in red to Sgt Price ,eg why I went to police,,, this is subsection of FEDJCAB complete, defined just FEDJCAB eg,,,,, why I went to police



SCOPE OF OFFENCE,,,Misconduct in public office is an offence at common law ,,,,,,,office confined to those that are public office holders and is commited when the office holder acts or fails to act in a way that constitutes a breach of the duties of that office. ,,,,,,,he is judge HHJDenyer that deals with appeals, there is no doubt he failed to act when appeals/appication are sent to him to pervert the course of justice.[CAN I ADD SEE APPENDIX 2][JACK TODAY NOV 2020 WILL ENCLOSE THIS DOCUMENT] DEFINITION OF OFFENCE wilfully neglects to perform his duty and/or wilfully misconduct himself ,,,,,,,,,he failed to perform his duty by ignoring my applications PUBLIC application sent to the court

As female QC barrister and judge stated who saw my website HHJCotter aware of 6.12.2017 application from his judgement , All we obtained from court,looked in court fee records no evidence of application 6.12.2017 on system,,,, was identical reply much later in scan redgrave,,

I didn’t find evidence of a properly filed application, with a fee, dated 6 December 2017. NO FEE REQUIRED AS FEMALE BARRISTER AND JUDGE STATED INTELLECTUAL INSOLENCE SAY WE LOOKED IN FEE SECTION,,APPLICATION NOT THERE,,,NO FEE REQUIRED VIA CASE LAW,,, Goc v Turkey.. Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS ,,YOU WILL SEE THE COURT AGREED 5.12.2017 PROCEDURE USED

Goc v Turkey.. Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS…

SYNOPSIS

1/ Note sent to HHJCotter with court N244 form, where he asks to pay fee to consider an application. Visit court 5.12.2017 as retired District Judge stated, you have made 2 applications to remove restraining order, ignored by the court,,,,[IGNORING OTHER APPLICATIONS BACK TO 2010 ,,YOU WILL SEE LATER 2018 2 MORE APPLICATIONS IGNORED THIS TIME BY HHJCOTTER in judicial review application as i state this is issue of malfeasance in public office ignoring applications for years, still going on in 2018,,,corrupt and bent Cotter states i went to police as ,,,,dissatisfied with judgements over the years of Denyer, as he corrupts and frustrates the judicial process,,,DENYER RETIRED IN 2017 NOTHING TO DO WITH HIS JUDGEMENTS] you need to do here in your official application, an application to remove restraining order,this could be thrown at you for years if not removed.



2/ Seek under The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France ,,,,],,,,,,,,,,,,for evidence to do application where courts Mr Blair states 5.12.2017 your not looking at files showing us ignoring your applications, or details of B26YM042 the restraining order issue eg asked is settlement of B26YM042 in file. . Told make application to HHJCotter who will also ignore your request, clearly conspiracy Blair already knew tactics. ,,,utter breach from above of Article 6, Cotter ignored application as Blair said he would. The issue followed up in email of the 7.12.2017….,,,,,We have from file see asked several times with no reply, can I please ask again, case b26ym042 this was settled BEFORE hearing via Tomlin order defendants wanted to use, is this Tomlin order in file please …

3/ Demand on the 5.12.2017 the court N244 form , please see format in scanN244 eg what I want court to do,,,,deface it write on it not to sent to HHJCotter until under Goc v Turkey.. Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS ,,,,A ,NEW N244 SENT [TO REPLACE DEFACED N244 FORM] AND ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, further arguments and evidence to the domestic court WAS SENT

,,,,[eg Adorisio v Netherlands ]

SENT VIA EMAIL NEXT DAY 6.12.2017



4/ Sent application under Goc v Turkey.. Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS ,,,,,6.12.2017 via email, court receipt,WE KNOW COURT OBTAINED ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, email of 7.12.2017 STATED,,

1/ In application yesterday requested that page one of N244 lodged previously was removed and replaced with document sent to you yesterday. Can you please confirm done.[email IGNORED] ,,

4/ Follow up email 21.12.2017 to make sure the removal of restraining order before HHJCotter,,,,eg

Goodafternoon,

We are putting together documents for 2018.

1/ We have application to remove, restraining order, before HHJCotter…..


This email also ignored so visit the court to obtain answers,to make sure application before Cotter, under Adorisio ,,,,,told a reply in due course. Heated argument over ECHR concept of Inequalties of Arms, for example NBT [North Bristol NHS Trust, ] their involvement in scan evidence 5 ,,,again this document sent to them today , if they want to make a comment to you Jack on facts. ,,NBT ,lawyer from emails to me,,,,NUMEROUS TIMES ,,we made application to the court that morning, then later,,,just had reply,,,,ON SAME DAY,,,,I CAN NOT GET ANY REPLIES. Still court ignores me,,,,utter breach of Article 6 …


The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias


However ACCEPT covered years ago in courts Mr Fowlers email,,,,your correspondence will not be read, not answered just filed. ,,,,UTTER BREACH ARTICLE 6


5/ Take up issue of Ineqalities of Arms again in email of the 29.12.2017 ,further in that email,,,


,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.You are aware [efiling] of much detail eg emails in December 2017 ,,,,,,,,,,,,,5, 2 on 6 and one on the 7 of December.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,


,,[Cotter aware of application in 2 parts on the 6.12.2017 ,,,under Goc v Turkey.. Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS ,,,,,I cite application 6.12.2017 which had to be split in 2 due to size,,,I CONCLUDE EMAIL 29.7.2017]




CAN JACK HAVE REPLY VIA EMAIL IN 7 DAYS,,,,,,COPY TO ME VIA EMAIL…,,,WITH NO REPLY IN 7 DAYS WILL ASSUME COURT REFUSES TO REPLY. ,,IGNORED


COTTER AWARE OF EMAIL 7.12.2017 eg 1/ In application yesterday requested that page one of N244 lodged previously was removed and replaced with document sent to you yesterday. Can you please confirm done.[email IGNORED] ,,AWARE OF N244 REMOVED WHAT N244 DID HE READ ????ONE HE MADE UP


6/ Can I now draw things together we know from scan cotterlate he read EMAIL OF 29.12.2017 , which he had to do ,,,


Goc v Turkey.. Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS ,,,,



As several lawyers/barristers stated Cotter is aware of emails of the 5 and 6 [the application] and 7 .12.2017. and they cite,,

Kerojarvi v Finland ,,,,,,,court [COTTER ] must exercise diligence for an appellant not represented by a lawyer,

From scan cotter late, admits all dates in his judgement wrong,,,,we may ask what drugs/intoxication he was on. ,,,,further as retired District Judge stated,,,,after seeing judgement,,,,,not judicial language however they are utter bastards,,,he had not read 6.12.2017 application made under

Goc v Turkey.. Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS ,,,,no reference to removal of restaining order



7/ Went to court told ,,,,we did not send to Cotter . Ask for refund of fee, the ombudsman issue. As female barrister and judge stated,,,interlectual insolence court stance we looked in our fee section no fee paid 6.12.2017,,,,,but no fee required from ECHR case law..

Goc v Turkey.. Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS ,,,,

Again as several lawyers/barristers have stated,,,,if court believed in goodwill a fee was required, and consider… Kerojarvi v Finland ,,,,,,,court must exercise diligence for an appellant not represented by a lawyer,

WHY DID COURT NOT ASK FOR A FEE.

8/ Comes under a Resolver complaint , where court just ignores for years correspondence , where ask you Jack to refer to ombudsman. We go via statute ,,,complaint,,,,to Resolver ,,,to ombudsman , where court corrupts and frustrates the judicial process, as Fowler stated years ago, utter breach of Article 6 ,,,we will ignore your correspondence, will not be read just filed. Escalate issue before you can refer Jack to ombudsman, please see scan redgrave enclosed.

SO TODAY AGAIN ASK

1/ Did you get application/N244 form the replacement of defaced N244 form on the 6.12.2017,as agreed with Blair. Made under,,,Goc v Turkey.. Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,, ADORISIO et al v NETHERLANDS ,,,,if answer is no simple solution for ombudsman,,,,can send you Jack court receipts.....was it read

2/ If not read could you explain to Jack why refund of fee not paid....Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to su


SCAN EVIDENCE 5 THE NBT ISSUE [NORTH BRISTOL NHS TRUST]

1/ NBT left me disabled, in chronic pain, ,,,,,,further in later inguinal hernia surgery a disaster, as failed in a few days …... later court application was for medical records, and to put via statute a message in medical records , and travel expensives. Comes before DJWatson at hearing , makes court order,,,where he asks defendants third party for statement , where case then struck out in papers supplied by NBT,,,,[statement utterly untrue]where ask for oral hearing. Just before second hearing defendants ask to settle, supply medical records, pay travel expenses, and agree to put statement in medical records eg .,,,,,ACCEPT MY CLAIM Defendants send their settlement to the court, rejected by DJBrittan, [ Brittan in claim a long time ago asked me to leave court so he could discuss case with then defendants,,,,,,where took up issue with then defendants lawyer with reply ,,,we would not be seen discussing case behind your back with Brittan for you to exploit later ,,,,said have to catch plane can not talk,,,,excuse made not to talk to Brittan ] where NBT above case comes before again DJWatson.

Before from file had recording for example from radiology that their medical records not disclosed, said 6 MONTHS BEFORE RESOLVE ISSUE WHERE NBT JUST STATE YOUR CLAIM STRUCK OUT BY DJWATSON ,,,,, WILL NOT SUPPLY MEDICAL RECORDS WILL NOT TALK TO YOU

For example in NBT case defendants asked to settle, A FEW DAYS BEFORE second HEARING At hearing they requested that judgement reads i acted unreasonably, this was rejected by the court, Ms Smith for defendants would not let it drop, I could not get into conversation, as DJWatson right hand raised in my direction,,,,,NO COMPLAINT OVER DJWATSON. DJWatson stated as in judgement he had read file and would not state this, eg I WAS ACTING UNREASONABLY aware 6 months ago asked to settle,,,,now suppling 6 months later medical records,,,putting statement in medical records ,,,paying travel expenses. CAN I REFER TO RETIRED DISTRICT JUDGE IN APPLICATION 6.12.2017 MADE UNDER TODAYS ISSUE NOT RELATED TO NBT WHERE STATED NOT JUDICIAL LANGUAGE HOWEVER BRISTOL COURT ARE UTTER BASTARDS. VIEW BACKED UP BY JUDICIARY PLEASE SEE MAIN TEXT TODAY . NBT LAWYER Ms SMITH LAWYER CALLED A BITCH,,,WITH FOLLOW UP APOLOGY BY ME AGAIN NOT JUDICIAL LANGUAGE. FROM MAIN TEXT MEDIA COVERED IF Ms Smith wants to contest content Jack,,,Today as in 3 appeals to remove restraining order,, I refer to ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,


Brumarescu v Rumania ,,,,,fundamental aspect of rule of law is the principle of legal certainty,which requires that when the courts have finally decided an issue then ruling should not be called into question ,,,,Tregubenko v Ukrain ,,,,,,,calling into question of decision in this manner whether it be by judges or the exeutive ............[did HHJDenyer call judgement into question, I HAD NOT ACTED UNREASONABLY please see below]

Athough matter determined by court , i had not acted unreasonably, its cited by HHJDenyer in a restraining order MADE because I acted unreasonably , as I appealed DJWatsons judgement, appeal,,,,,, medical records still outstanding, travel expenses not paid and refusal to put statement in my medical records, ,,,,,,,. Further cites claim v Compuwave,, please see details in scan evidence 4,,,,,where we have again case settled, where told not therefore to attend hearing, as matter settled, it had been removed by Denyer from hearing date, where as no one turned up, case dismissed, where seek to appeal,,,,the recording with court not to attend sent to Denyer,where appeal dismissed. AGAIN PART OF RESTRAINING ORDER AS I APPEALED.


2/ In next year 2018 make application for more medical records,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,DATES LATER THAN PREVIOUS CASE THEREFORE COULD NOT BE INCLUDED IN PREVIOUS POC, [PARTICULARS OF CLAIM.] NBT again refuse to release, where HHJCotter strikes out claim,,,,???????????????????i As retired district judge stated,,,,you make application to the court,,,,goes on computer system,TAKES TIME,,,,then goes to a PRE OR DISTRICT JUDGE FOR DIRECTIONS. WHY ON SAME DAY SENT TO HHJCOTTER THE DAY YOU LODGED PROCEEDINGS,,,,IS IT A CASE DO NOT ISSUE HIS PROCEEDINGS SEND TO ME FIRST TO SEE IF I CAN FIND A LOOPHOLE TO STRIKE OUT, in papers. As various barristers/lawyers state,,,,,was struck out as abuse of process,,,,Blair aware of previous claim did he take straight away saying should have been included in previous POC,,,REASON STRUCK OUT..] Appeal , get hearing date, where Cotters clerk then states have had long talk with NBT over defence, …..hearing date agreed with NBT removed from list, WE HAVE AGREED WAY FORWARD. . WHAT HAS THIS CORRUPT COURT ORGANISED WITH NBT ????


3/ So application N244 to court to find out what was agreed with NBT ,,,,,IGNORED , ,,,,,WENT TO COURT TOLD COURT WILL NOT REPLY TO APPLICATION


SEE TODAYS ISSUE IN JUDICIAL REVIEW MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE IGNORING APPLICATIONS FOR YEARS STILL GOING ON IN 2018. ,,,,,THIS APPLICATION IGNORED


LETTER 25.2.2018,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,WITH APPLICATION ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,


I will from start today make a stance, i will not tolerate any fresh nonsense defendants lawyer Ms Smith puts before the court. I REQUEST BY 5.00 PM 26.2.2018 SHE SENDS TO ME VIA EMAIL HER COMMENTS TO THIS ORDER.WITHOUT THIS WILL REQUEST AN ADJOURNMENT SO I CAN AT A LATER DATE PRODUCE DOCUMENTS IN TERMS OF ALLEGATIONS FILED AFTER I SEE DEFENCE .

Ruiz –Materis v Spain,,,,,,,,,,,,,,plaintiff to have knowledge and comment on all evidence adducted or observations filed,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

APEH et al v Hungary ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,it is inadmissible for one party to make submissions to a court without knowledge of the other and on which the later has no opportunity to comment,,,,

Are we going to have the utter nonsense as in OBS08441 which i won where DJWatson states,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,do you want to come back after i get you a defence, …..


ALREADY CASES WHERE IN UTTER BREACH OF ARTICLE 6 HAVE NO DEFENCE TO MY CLAIM


4/ No defence therefore,,,,,can I please cite POC…]PARTICLARS OF CLAIM]



IN THE BRISTOL COUNTY COURT CASE NUMBER



PLAINTIFF PHILIP JONES

DEFENDANTS NORTH BRISTOL NHS TRUST

CLAIM ,,,eg asking court

For defendants to release medical records of 24.7.2015 and for plaintiff to put a statement in DEFENDANTS medical records.

LEGAL BASIS ,,,,,1/ ,No evidence required in terms of obtaining medical records, in terms of putting statement in medical records, please see statutory regulations of NHS ,,,,,,the defendants must allow if requested for plaintiff to add statement to his medical records.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,



Comes before HHJRalton , Jack you can not get involved in court judgements, not asking you to, todays application to you primary for legal aid., nothing to do with NBT, Ralton states,,,,,,,,,,,,,,had very long discussion with Cotter over this case,,,[Cotter makes judgement,,,i appeal,,,why is Ralton discussing case with Cotter,,,,may I suggest todays issue,,,,Bigger makes judgement,,,did he ask Legatt LJ to issue restraining order] ,,,Ralton states reason he struck out as your POC utterly incomprensible he did not know what you wanted court to do,,,,????????????????????FOR MEDIA YOU HAVE POC ABOVE YOU MAKE DEDUCTIONS DO YOU KNOW WHAT I WANTED COURT TO DO



5/ NBT agree to supply medical records of set day taken cited in the POC, plus put statement in medical records. Get letter of third party understanding of medical records, however as statute do not get at this stage copy of medical records taken on day. Ask to look at medical records, from recording statement not in file. Ask for actual records TAKEN ON CITED DATE FROM HOSPITAL FILE REFUSED BY NBT. From judgement if not supplied can made application back to the court. Talk to PSU, [know now support through court…..covered them today in this document…if they wish to contact in 7 days you Jack,,,,. They talk to court staff at Bristol county court,,,,,where must admit court staff were good trying to help. Agreed court staff/ PSU to write letter to HHJRalton,,,,,,eg should I under a N244 court form ask for order to release medical records taken on cited day, informed his judgement ignored,,,,explained discussed with court/PSU they recommended letter to him. As several people barristers/judges stated,,,,, Kerojarvi v Finland ,,,,,,,court must exercise diligence for an appellant not represented by a lawyer,

Could understand in reply ….not allowed to give legal advice,,,where you could have made application with new N244 form,,,,,however can I refer to todays issue,,IGNORING APPLICATIONS FOR YEARS STILL GOING ON IN 2018,,,,STILL GOING ON WHERE COURT STATES IN RECORDING AT COURT,,,,,,,HHJRALTON HAS NO COMMENT TO MAKE,,,AWARE HIS ORDER NOT ADHERED TO

SCAN EVIDENCE 5 THE NBT ISSUE [NORTH BRISTOL NHS TRUST]

1/ NBT left me disabled, in chronic pain, ,,,,,,further in later inguinal hernia surgery a disaster, as failed in a few days …... later court application was for medical records, and to put via statute a message in medical records , and travel expensives. Comes before DJWatson at hearing , makes court order,,,where he asks defendants third party for statement , where case then struck out in papers supplied by NBT,,,,[statement utterly untrue]where ask for oral hearing. Just before second hearing defendants ask to settle, supply medical records, pay travel expenses, and agree to put statement in medical records eg .,,,,,ACCEPT MY CLAIM Defendants send their settlement to the court, rejected by DJBrittan, [ Brittan in claim a long time ago asked me to leave court so he could discuss case with then defendants,,,,,,where took up issue with then defendants lawyer with reply ,,,we would not be seen discussing case behind your back with Brittan for you to exploit later ,,,,said have to catch plane can not talk,,,,excuse made not to talk to Brittan ] where NBT above case comes before again DJWatson.

Before from file had recording for example from radiology that their medical records not disclosed, said 6 MONTHS BEFORE RESOLVE ISSUE WHERE NBT JUST STATE YOUR CLAIM STRUCK OUT BY DJWATSON ,,,,, WILL NOT SUPPLY MEDICAL RECORDS WILL NOT TALK TO YOU

For example in NBT case defendants asked to settle, A FEW DAYS BEFORE second HEARING At hearing they requested that judgement reads i acted unreasonably, this was rejected by the court, Ms Smith for defendants would not let it drop, I could not get into conversation, as DJWatson right hand raised in my direction,,,,,NO COMPLAINT OVER DJWATSON. DJWatson stated as in judgement he had read file and would not state this, eg I WAS ACTING UNREASONABLY aware 6 months ago asked to settle,,,,now suppling 6 months later medical records,,,putting statement in medical records ,,,paying travel expenses. CAN I REFER TO RETIRED DISTRICT JUDGE IN APPLICATION 6.12.2017 MADE UNDER TODAYS ISSUE NOT RELATED TO NBT WHERE STATED NOT JUDICIAL LANGUAGE HOWEVER BRISTOL COURT ARE UTTER BASTARDS. VIEW BACKED UP BY JUDICIARY PLEASE SEE MAIN TEXT TODAY . NBT LAWYER Ms SMITH LAWYER CALLED A BITCH,,,WITH FOLLOW UP APOLOGY BY ME AGAIN NOT JUDICIAL LANGUAGE. FROM MAIN TEXT MEDIA COVERED IF Ms Smith wants to contest content Jack,,,Today as in 3 appeals to remove restraining order,, I refer to ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,


Brumarescu v Rumania ,,,,,fundamental aspect of rule of law is the principle of legal certainty,which requires that when the courts have finally decided an issue then ruling should not be called into question ,,,,Tregubenko v Ukrain ,,,,,,,calling into question of decision in this manner whether it be by judges or the exeutive ............[did HHJDenyer call judgement into question, I HAD NOT ACTED UNREASONABLY please see below]

Athough matter determined by court , i had not acted unreasonably, its cited by HHJDenyer in a restraining order MADE because I acted unreasonably , as I appealed DJWatsons judgement, appeal,,,,,, medical records still outstanding, travel expenses not paid and refusal to put statement in my medical records, ,,,,,,,. Further cites claim v Compuwave,, please see details in scan evidence 4,,,,,where we have again case settled, where told not therefore to attend hearing, as matter settled, it had been removed by Denyer from hearing date, where as no one turned up, case dismissed, where seek to appeal,,,,the recording with court not to attend sent to Denyer,where appeal dismissed. AGAIN PART OF RESTRAINING ORDER AS I APPEALED.


2/ In next year 2018 make application for more medical records,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,DATES LATER THAN PREVIOUS CASE THEREFORE COULD NOT BE INCLUDED IN PREVIOUS POC, [PARTICULARS OF CLAIM.] NBT again refuse to release, where HHJCotter strikes out claim,,,,???????????????????i As retired district judge stated,,,,you make application to the court,,,,goes on computer system,TAKES TIME,,,,then goes to a PRE OR DISTRICT JUDGE FOR DIRECTIONS. WHY ON SAME DAY SENT TO HHJCOTTER THE DAY YOU LODGED PROCEEDINGS,,,,IS IT A CASE DO NOT ISSUE HIS PROCEEDINGS SEND TO ME FIRST TO SEE IF I CAN FIND A LOOPHOLE TO STRIKE OUT, in papers. As various barristers/lawyers state,,,,,was struck out as abuse of process,,,,Blair aware of previous claim did he take straight away saying should have been included in previous POC,,,REASON STRUCK OUT..] Appeal , get hearing date, where Cotters clerk then states have had long talk with NBT over defence, …..hearing date agreed with NBT removed from list, WE HAVE AGREED WAY FORWARD. . WHAT HAS THIS CORRUPT COURT ORGANISED WITH NBT ????


3/ So application N244 to court to find out what was agreed with NBT ,,,,,IGNORED , ,,,,,WENT TO COURT TOLD COURT WILL NOT REPLY TO APPLICATION


SEE TODAYS ISSUE IN JUDICIAL REVIEW MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE IGNORING APPLICATIONS FOR YEARS STILL GOING ON IN 2018. ,,,,,THIS APPLICATION IGNORED


LETTER 25.2.2018,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,WITH APPLICATION ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,


I will from start today make a stance, i will not tolerate any fresh nonsense defendants lawyer Ms Smith puts before the court. I REQUEST BY 5.00 PM 26.2.2018 SHE SENDS TO ME VIA EMAIL HER COMMENTS TO THIS ORDER.WITHOUT THIS WILL REQUEST AN ADJOURNMENT SO I CAN AT A LATER DATE PRODUCE DOCUMENTS IN TERMS OF ALLEGATIONS FILED AFTER I SEE DEFENCE .

Ruiz –Materis v Spain,,,,,,,,,,,,,,plaintiff to have knowledge and comment on all evidence adducted or observations filed,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

APEH et al v Hungary ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,it is inadmissible for one party to make submissions to a court without knowledge of the other and on which the later has no opportunity to comment,,,,

Are we going to have the utter nonsense as in OBS08441 which i won where DJWatson states,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,do you want to come back after i get you a defence, …..


ALREADY CASES WHERE IN UTTER BREACH OF ARTICLE 6 HAVE NO DEFENCE TO MY CLAIM


4/ No defence therefore,,,,,can I please cite POC…]PARTICLARS OF CLAIM]



IN THE BRISTOL COUNTY COURT CASE NUMBER



PLAINTIFF PHILIP JONES

DEFENDANTS NORTH BRISTOL NHS TRUST

CLAIM ,,,eg asking court

For defendants to release medical records of 24.7.2015 and for plaintiff to put a statement in DEFENDANTS medical records.

LEGAL BASIS ,,,,,1/ ,No evidence required in terms of obtaining medical records, in terms of putting statement in medical records, please see statutory regulations of NHS ,,,,,,the defendants must allow if requested for plaintiff to add statement to his medical records.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,



Comes before HHJRalton , Jack you can not get involved in court judgements, not asking you to, todays application to you primary for legal aid., nothing to do with NBT, Ralton states,,,,,,,,,,,,,,had very long discussion with Cotter over this case,,,[Cotter makes judgement,,,i appeal,,,why is Ralton discussing case with Cotter,,,,may I suggest todays issue,,,,Bigger makes judgement,,,did he ask Legatt LJ to issue restraining order] ,,,Ralton states reason he struck out as your POC utterly incomprensible he did not know what you wanted court to do,,,,????????????????????FOR MEDIA YOU HAVE POC ABOVE YOU MAKE DEDUCTIONS DO YOU KNOW WHAT I WANTED COURT TO DO



5/ NBT agree to supply medical records of set day taken cited in the POC, plus put statement in medical records. Get letter of third party understanding of medical records, however as statute do not get at this stage copy of medical records taken on day. Ask to look at medical records, from recording statement not in file. Ask for actual records TAKEN ON CITED DATE FROM HOSPITAL FILE REFUSED BY NBT. From judgement if not supplied can made application back to the court. Talk to PSU, [know now support through court…..covered them today in this document…if they wish to contact in 7 days you Jack,,,,. They talk to court staff at Bristol county court,,,,,where must admit court staff were good trying to help. Agreed court staff/ PSU to write letter to HHJRalton,,,,,,eg should I under a N244 court form ask for order to release medical records taken on cited day, informed his judgement ignored,,,,explained discussed with court/PSU they recommended letter to him. As several people barristers/judges stated,,,,, Kerojarvi v Finland ,,,,,,,court must exercise diligence for an appellant not represented by a lawyer,

Could understand in reply ….not allowed to give legal advice,,,where you could have made application with new N244 form,,,,,however can I refer to todays issue,,IGNORING APPLICATIONS FOR YEARS STILL GOING ON IN 2018,,,,STILL GOING ON WHERE COURT STATES


END OF LETTER TO JACK LOPRESTI NOV 2020


........................................................................,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX


b/ Who made allegations of ,,,delusinary ,,,and can you cite events where come to this conclusion please

QUESTIONS TO HMCS [HM court service]

QUESTION 1 WHAT EVIDENCE WAS ON FILE WHERE SALFORD CC WOULD NOT ISSUE MY CLAIM DUE TO ALLEGATIONS OF RESTRAINING ORDER IN PLACE

QUESTION 2 TO HMCS WAS THE FEDJCABcomplete AND ABOVE 5/ 7/THE ISSUE...IN PRE ACTION PROTOCOL FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW DOCUMENT 2017 . FURTHER POLICE COULD DISPUTE FACTS WE DID DEFEND FACTS , CAN YOU COMFIRM POLICE MADE NO DEFENCE AS INFORMED YOU IN EMAIL OF 17.11.2017.DID YOU GET EMAIL OF 17.11.2017. COTTER KNOWS FACTS POLICE ADMIT FACTS , CAN YOU PLEASE CONFIRM WHEN HHJDENYER RETIRED ,,,,EXACT DATE PLEASE


QUESTION 3 TO HMCS YOU STATE WE DID NOT GET APPLICATION 6.12.2017 AND IN 2017 WE WERE UTTERLY UNAWARE OF POSSIBLE APPLICATION OF THE 6.12.2017. MADE UNDER Göç v. Turkey [GC], § 57). Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,,,. CAN YOU CONFIRM STANCE AND WILL NOT PAY REFUND OF FEE. WE ACCEPT YOU CAN NOT PAY AS LEGATT LJ STATES FACTS OF CASE IN COTTERS JUDGEMENT BUT YOUR SAYING WE DID NOT GET AND THEREFORE COTTER DID NOT READ APPLICATION OF 6.12.2017

QUESTION 4 TO HMCS DID YOU GET EMAILS OF 5 ,,, 7,,,21 AND 29.12.2017. OR ARE YOU MAKING ALLEGATIONS THAT MY COURT RECEIPTS ARE FORGERIES. WE ASK ALTHOUGH IN JUDGEMENT COTTER CITES EMAIL OF 29.12.2017 eg what did I say ,,,29.12.2017

For example recorded conversation at court with Mr Blair where i wrote on N244 form amendment would be sent to application, not to sent to HHJCotter until amendment sent, can you please give me a reply to these cited emails above,

SO COTTER AWARE I DEFACED N244 FORM AND AMENDMENT SENT ,,,, Göç v. Turkey [GC], § 57). Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,,,. WE HAVE BEEN ASKING FOR NEARLY 2 YEARS FURTHER .

a/ Cotter aware defaced N244 form, can we have copy of form defaced, in email 7.12.207 aware of new N244 form and new amended application. ,,,,can we have copies of these, eg what did Cotter consider in judgement . Further aware of application 6.12.2017 as admits read email of 29.12.2017...where I state in email,,, ARE THESE IN FILE You are aware [efiling] of much detail eg emails in December 2017 ,,,,,,,,,,,,,5, 2 on 6 and one on the 7 of December.,,FROM EMAIL

You are aware [efiling] of much detail eg emails in December 2017 ,,,,,,,,,,,,,5, 2 on 6 and one on the 7 of December.LEGGATT LJ STATES FACTS OF CASE IN COTTERS JUDGEMENT BUT HMCS STATE HE DID NOT READ APPLICATION OF 6.12.2017 WHAT DID HE READ AN APPLICATION HE PRODUCED FORGED MY SIGNATURE TO CORRUPT AND FRUSTRATE THE JUDICIAL PROCESS.

COTTER STATES EMAILS AFTER 5.12.2017 WHICH HE READ CAN WE PLEASE HAVE COPIES OF THESE,,,,KNOWS AMENDMENT SENT LETS SEE WHAT WAS BEFORE HIM IN AMENDMENT TO COME TO CONCLUSION I WENT TO POLICE MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE AS DISSATISFIED WITH JUDGEMENTS OF DENYER.

AS QC JUDGE AND BARRISTER STATED COTTER AND LATER HHJBIGGER WAS NEVER GOING TO GRANT YOUR APPLICATION,,,,TURKEYS VOTING FOR XMAS AS WOULD BE INVITING POLICE IN TO THEIR COURTS TO EXPOSE THEIR CRIMINAL BEHAVIOUR. ....]


QUESTION 5 TO HMCS AGAIN COURT RECEIPT HOWEVER IS THE EMAIL 13.7.2018 AND 19.7.2018 IN FILE OR HAS COURT OF APPEAL REMOVED. (Göç v. Turkey [GC], § 57). Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,,,,,I ASKED IN APPLICATION TO LOOK AT FILES,,,,,IGNORED BY COURT OF APPEAL SO PRESENTED EVIDENCE FOR CONSIDERATION

HMCS Question 6 ,,,, is email address correct…7.12.2017 DID YOU GET EMAIL .HAVE ASKED HMCS NOW FOR NEARLY 2 YEARS,,,,DID YOU GET EMAIL,,,ASKED NUMEROUS TIMES WHERE THEY JUST IGNORE…UTTER BREACH OF ARTICLE 6 ,,,,OF HUMAN RIGHTS ACT,,,,CAN NOT ANSWER AS TODAY AS FATAL FOR HMCS eg ,,,HMCS WERE AWARE OF APPLICATION 6.12.2017 BINNED ,CAN NOT ANSWER AS WOULD SHOW COTTER DID NOT READ APPLICATION OF 6.12.2017 AND LEGATT STATING THE FACTS OF CASE IN COTTERS JUDGEMENT,,,,WHAT DID COTTER READ A DOCUMENT HE PRODUCED.

So we ask court QUESTION 7 did you obtain above emails, DEC 2017 7, 21.29 OF DEC can we have copy of N244 that HHJCotter considered, eg what I wanted HHJCotter to do, and paid for, all correspondence ignored since Jan 2018,will try again today, ombudsman would need evidence in his/her consideration ,,,,,,,,,,,,,did HMCS obtain application of 6.12.2017 , or were they aware of possible application of 6.12.2017, eg did you obtain email,7.12.2017,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Email 7.12.2017 eg……………

1/ In application yesterday requested that page one of N244 lodged previously was removed and replaced with document sent to you yesterday. Can you please confirm done.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

We know N244 I wrote on application,,,[,,recorded],,,, removed, not to send to HHJCotter, What did Cotter read,,,A N244 AND DOCUMENT HE PRODUCED TO CORRUPT AND FRUSTRATE THE JUDICIAL PROCESS.CAN WE HAVE COPY OF APPLICATION PAID FOR PLUS N244FORM IN AMENDED APPLICATION

QUESTION 8 TO HMCS IN B26YMO42 AGAIN WE HAVE COURT RECEIPT FOR SETTLEMENT AS DEFENDANTS ASKED TO SETTLE ,,,EMAIL TOMLIN ORDER AS THEY REQUESTED SENT. WAS THE APPLICATION TO REMOVE CASE FROM HEARING OBTAINED WITH SIGNED STATEMENT FROM COMPUWAVE ,,,,,CASE SETTLED,,,,,IF YES WHY WAS IT NOT REMOVED FROM HEARING LIST. .FURTHER IS APPLICATIONS 26.2.2017 26.10.2017 TO REMOVE RESTRAINING ORDER ARE THESE IN FILE.




QUESTION 9 to HMCS do you have any reason to believe scan appendix 2 that HMCS did not stamp this document, eg is court stamp forgery. So we have my applications ignored, lawyers application ignored, my MPs correspondence on issue ignored. WE HAVE COURT CORRESPONDENCE,,,,,,,,,,,,WE IGNORED YOUR APPLICATIONS MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE A CRIMINAL OFFENCE COME AND TALK TO US.HOW CAN POLICE STATE WE HAVE NO EVIDENCE.



QUESTION 10 TO HMCS.see 14th time asked. From recording Mr Blair states our Mr Till sent your application for oral hearing to Cardiff court, co/1/2013. Is this application in file, or has court removed. How do Bristol court record that documents transferred to another court, how does Cardiff court record delivery from a different court. Does Bristol court have any record of applications made With respect to my emails did Ms Weaver every supply replies, if so can we please have replies.


QUESTION 11 TO HMCS ,,,,,THERE WERE APPLICATIONS TO REMOVE THIS ORDER ON THE 26.2.2016 AND 26.10.2016 6.12.2017 ARE THESE IN FILE OR HAVE THEY BEEN REMOVED,,,,WHERE THERE FURTHER CORRESPONDENCE ASKING YOU IF YOU REQUIRE ANYTHING FURTHER IN 2 EARLIER APPLICATIONS AS I FOLLOWED UP AS APPLICATIONS IGNORED.

QUESTION 12 to HMCS do you have any reason to believe that HMCS did not stamp this document, SCAN APPENDIX2 eg court stamp is forgery. So we have my applications ignored, lawyers application ignored, my MPs correspondence on issue ignored. WE HAVE COURT CORRESPONDENCE,,,,,,,,,,,,WE IGNORED YOUR APPLICATIONS MALFEASANCE [MISCONDUCT ] IN PUBLIC OFFICE A CRIMINAL OFFENCE COME AND TALK TO US.HOW CAN POLICE STATE WE HAVE NO EVIDENCE.




QUESTION 13 TO HMCS ,,Can I refer to paragraph f 1/ where court of appeal in judgement stated ,,,why can Bristol court not issue proper paperwork, again see TODAYS question asked over 20 times. In judgement Cotter cites email of the 14.11.2018,,,,,[can not be 2018 what drugs/intoxication was he on] assume 17.11.2017. No emails of 14.11.2017, if HMCS maintain these 2 emails are ones of 14.11.2017 can I please have copy. Can you please confirm should be 17.11.2017 emails were recited on the 17.11.2017 from evidence ALREADY COPIED from pre action protocol document, eg WHY I went to police,eg,,,,

StranGreek v Greece …………..a right to present which they regard as relevant .The right can only be seen to be effective if the observations are actually heard, that is to say considered by the court , have a duty to conduct a proper examination of arguments/evidence adducted by the parties,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Principle whereby a civil claim be capable of being submitted to a judge ranks as one of the universally recognised principles of law……………[FOR YEARS IGNORING APPLICATIONS]

THIS CITING IN PRE ACTION PROTOCOL FOLLOWED BY NEXT STEP THE ECHR


QUESTION 14 TO HMCS,,,,again asked over 20 times,,,,. We know Cotter obtained,,email 7.12.2017 , see above HMCS receipt,,,,email 7.12.2017,,,,

For example recorded conversation at court with Mr Blair where i wrote on N244 form amendment would be sent to application, not to sent to HHJCotter until amendment sent,

So aware after 5.12.2017 amendment would be sent , not to send to Cotter until new application sent, aware of 7.12.2017 email as quoted in 29.7.2017 , so aware application not complete. ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, a line was put through old N244 form. Can we please have the N244 considered by HHJCotter, and can we please have copy of application considered by HHJCotter, we know old N244 removed, what was N244 considered, and can we have copy of application amendment which Cotter knows existed, Cotter states emails after 5.12.2017 sent,,,,,,can we have copies of these please

LETS SEE DOCUMENT AFTER 5.12.2017 WHERE COTTER COMES TO JUDGEMENT YOU WENT TO POLICE AS DISSATISFIED WITH JUDGEMENTS OF DENYER.A GREAT WORRY AS RECENTLY HIGH COURT JUDGE STATED MAY NEVER GET WITH HMCS FOR EXAMPLE,,,,WE CAN NOT FIND FILE

QUESTION 15 TO HMCS DID COTTER REPLY TO COURT APPLICATION, FEB 2018 IF SO CAN WE PLEASE HAVE COPY OF REPLY. IN TERMS OF HHJRALTON AGAIN WE HAVE RECEIPT FOR EMAIL DID YOU GET AND DID HHJRALTON ISSUE ANY REPLY AS INFORMED HIM MEDICAL RECIRDS NOT SUPPLIED.

QUESTION 16 TO HMCS CAN YOU SUPPLY DATA UNDER Göç v. Turkey [GC], § 57). ,,,,,,,,,,,,,SENT TO BIRMINGHAM COURT .CAN YOU CONFIRM SENT TO HHJBIGGER eg ,,,,WHAT WAS BEFORE BIGGER . APPLICATION TO BIGGER TO LOOK AT FILES. .CAN YOU CONFIRM IGNORED IF REPLY CAN WE PLEASE HAVE COPY.



QUESTION 17 TO HMCS IS THE EMAIL OF 13.7.2018 AND 19.7.2018 IN FILE. FURTHER WAS EVIDENCE BELOW IN EMAIL OF THE 19.7.2018 eg you had scan 10594 where police admit in their IPCC investigation we did not follow IPCC regulations

3/ We went to police after picketing at court over again as applications ignored, still going on from above, barrister told me to report to police malfeasance in public office as ignoring applications, from first correspondence to police,FEDJCAB,,EG

.,,,,,,,,,,,DEFINITION OF OFFENCE wilfully neglects to perform his duty and/or wilfully misconduct himself ,,,,,,,,,he failed to perform his duty by ignoring my applications , reason went to police as courts ignoring applications. so no doubt in judicial review application , can i please quoted page 2 of judicial review application.,,,,,, The issue with police ,,,,,,perjury issue [Eaga case] and court staff /judges ignoring applications, and correspondence, ignored,,,

4/ Numerous applications ignored over time and as JCIO stated complaint malfeasance in public office ignoring applications, criminal offence, and we can not investigate, further as cases over long period of time if an issue we could investigate it would be out of time, which makes nonsense of judgement you complained over HHJDenyer judgements, [no ignoring applications]and should have taken to JCIO, [no they could not investigate as JR application ]please put email eclosed from JCIO , also please put on file enclosed email .HHJBidder states police acted correctly , so they can ignore statutory regulations in their investigations, and send reply to an appeal, where THEY ADMIT NOT LODGED

TAB21.

QUESTION 18 to HMCS what evidence was in file in November 2018 for you to believe a restraining order was in place, CAN I REFER TO RECORDED CALL TO YOU IT DOES NOT RELATE TO ORDER OF 2016.


QUESTION 19 TO HMCS. DID POLICE OR HMCS EVER MAKE ANY APPLICATIONS TO ANY COURT DISPUTING ANY OF MY APPLICATIONS. . WE DID GET FROM YOU,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,SORRY VERY LATE OUT OF TIME IN COURT OF APPEAL STAGE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE WE WILL NOT ISSUE ANY DOCUMENTS UNLESS ORDER FROM JUDGE ,ITS AN ISSUE BETWEEN YOU AND POLICE WE DO NOT WISH TO BE INVOLVED. CAN YOU CONFIRM EMAIL SEEKING INFORMATION TO DO REMOVAL OF RESTRAINING ORDER WAS ALSO IGNORED, AGAIN YOU HAD NO COMMENT TO MAKE. IF REPLY CAN WE PLEASE HAVE COPY.

QUESTION 20 TO HMCS ,,Can you confirm police allegation in question 11 to police ,and who was person who supplied information to police. In terms of co/1/2018 why was I not allowed to do application, can I refer to my complaint, after you stated,,,,,,,,,court lawyer prepared papers.

e/ We ask final question to HMCS number 21 We had no reply to question is fee 528.00. Can I refer to HMCS document

Application to vary (amend/change) a judgment (or order), suspend enforcement or suspend a warrant of possession or stay at High Court £50.

Eg to vary, amend order, Master stated HMCS would consider new application.

Can I request CPS that document today is forwarded to a judge. We have in utterly cowardly way Legatt quoting restraining order of 2016, where in 26.2.2016 26.10.2016 and 6.12.2017 applications to remove. We know why ignored, as at hearing DEFENDANTS ASKED THAT JUDGEMENT STATED THIS. THIS REJECTED BY DJWATSON MY 3 APPLICATIONS UNDER

Brumarescu v Rumania ,,,,,fundamental aspect of rule of law is the principle of legal certainty,which requires that when the courts have finally decided an issue then ruling should not be called into question ,,[, I HAD NOT ACTED UNREASONABLY] ,Tregubenko v Ukrain ,,,,,,,calling into question of decision in this manner whether it be by judges or the exeutive ............[did HHJDenyer call judgement into question, as he issues restraining order over issue]

HMCS RECENTLY VIA COMPENSATION PAID 150.00 IF I LODGED AT COURT WOULD THE COURT OBTAIN TRANSCRIPT,,,,IF IT SHOWED APPLICATION REJECTED BY DJWATSON WOULD COURT REPAY THE 150.00

eg GoreWood v Johnson [2000] UKHL 65 ,,,,should not be vexed a second time over same facts when issue determined by the court ,,,,,,,,,,,,,court in utter disrepute if we have different verdicts to same facts [as we have today,]

IS IT ALRIGHT TO JUDGES TO MAKE COWARDLY ATTACKS

We have issue of court of appeal application, as computer crash emailed court to obtain application at conclusion of hearing, again emails ignored. Court states binned after hearing as regulations. Judge advised from a theoretical point of view true, however this was just a warning to back up, if you required offered to pay cost of return there was no reason why your request not made, further if not doing court had duty to inform you, so you could ask for sections you require to be photocopied, with you paying court copy fees. DO YOU HAVE OWN COPY OF APPLICATION IF SO FREE OF CHARGE CAN YOU COPY FILE ACCEPT POSTAGE /PACKING CHARGE















QUESTIONS TO POLICE

QUESTION ONE TO POLICE WAS THE ABOVE FEDJCABcomplete AND SCAN 13.4.2017 DOCUMENT SENT TO SGT PRICE. We have receipt from Patchway police station WAS THE FEDJCABcomplete AND ABOVE 5/ DETAILS OF MATTER 7/THE ISSUE...IN PRE ACTION PROTOCOL FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW. DID YOU ISSUE ANY DEFENCE TO HMCS.

QUESTION 2 TO POLICE MALFEASANCE [MISCONDUCT] IN PUBLIC OFFICE IGNORING APPLICATIONS FOR YEARS, IS A CRIMINAL OFFENCE AS YOU ARE AWARE IN EBRAHIMI CASE WHERE YOUR OFFICERS JAILED, IS IT TRUE VIA STATUTE JCIO ]judicial conduct investigation office ] could not investigate as a criminal offence,

from judicial conduct publication] We cannot investigate

Allegations of criminal activity for example, perverting the course of justice , [Eaga case perjury/malfeasance in public office ] (criminal allegations should be directed to the POLICE ) ……………………

JCIO STATE from website,,,,,,,,,,,, …



Can I complain to you because I believe a judge is involved in corruption or has committed fraud?

No. Such allegations would be a matter for the police.

You were utterly aware of this from barristers citing as recently before your offices jailed Duffy/Passmore in the Ebrahimi case, with identical issue as today, as criminal allegations ignored.

QUESTION 3 TO POLICE DID I COME TO YOU AS FEDJCABcomplete AND PRE ACTION PROTOCOL FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW DOCUMENT AS HMCS IGNORING APPLICATIONS FOR YEARS. CAN I REFER TO RECORDING WITH SGT PRICE WHERE ISSUE CITED BY INSP O MAHONY ,,,EG WILL WE GET COURT STAFF SAY ,,,WE SENT APPLICATIONS TO HHJDENYER,,,,,,AND DENYER SAYING,,,NEVER SEEN APPLICATIONS. JUDICIARY STATE I WENT SOLELY MALFEASANCE [MISCONDUCT ] IN PUBLIC OFFICE,,,AS DISSATISFIED WITH JUDGEMENTS OF HHJDENYER. AWARE RECORDING/PRE ACTION PROTOCOL DOCUMENT SHOWS OTHERWISE ,,,,,COTTER CORRUPT AND BENT DENYING EVIDENCE IN FRONT OF HIM,,,to falsely deny their existence, this would have the effect of denying them a fair hearing, in violation of Article 6 § 1 .... HOWEVER ASKING YOU DO YOU HAVE ANY EVIDENCE I CAME TO YOU AS MALFEASANCE [MISCONDUCT] IN PUBLIFC OFFICE,,,,,,,,,,,AS SOLELY DISSATISFIED WITH JUDGEMENTS OF HHJDENYER.





















QUESTION 4 TO POLICE THE ISSUE TO POLICE COVERED IN QUESTIONS BELOW,,,THESE IN DETAIL WILL BE CITED LATER, CAN I PLEASE ASK POLICE HOWEVER TO ANSWER AS TABLE BELOW SIMPLE ANSWER ,,,YES/NO eg


DID I COME TO YOU MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE

AS FOR YEARS COURT IGNORING APPLICATIONS AND PERJURY ISSUE YES NO


ARE THESE CRIMINAL OFFENCES AND THEREFORE VIA STATUTE YES NO

COULD NOT TAKE TO JCIO


IN INVESTIGATION CAN YOU CONFIRM YOU DID NOT YES NO

FOLLOW IPCC REGULATIONS


CAN YOU CONFIRM IF MY EMAIL 22.7.2017 WAS FINAL APPEAL YES NO


CAN YOU CONFIRM I CAME TO YOU MALFEASANCE NOT MISFEASANCE YES NO


QUESTIONS TO POLICE 5 RELATES TO QUESTION 4

,

1/ Early 2017 as barristers advice did I come to you, malfeasance in public office, as for years courts ignoring applications, where Sgt Price asked me to send CPS document on malfeasance in public office and show how it related to my complaint to police, we did not know OFFENDERS HMCS staff not sending applications to HHJDenyer or HHJDenyer ignoring applications malfeasance in public office ignoring applications as explained by your Insp O Mahony please see scan 10594.


2/ Do you have any evidence I came to you as ,,,,malfeasance in public office as dissatisfied over judgements of HHJDenyer, if so can you please disclose.


3/ PCBird in letter confirms went over offence malfeasance in public office, further perjury issue, can you please confirm criminal offence, and therefore via statute could not complain to JCIO.


4/ Can I refer to IPCC summary regulations , and Insp O Mahonys letter, scan 10594 , can you confirm you did not follow IPCC regulations. Eg Mr Galloway never contacted me.


Regulations IPCC in a police investigation.

Contact to make sure have all details

Ask what you want to happen

Inform you what is likely to happen

Talk to you about way they will deal with your complaint

Let you know the outcome when they have finished , do in person or on phone ,BUT should also write to you



5/ From your letter 5.12.2017 ,,,,, You then emailed in reply 22.7.2017 and accused,,,,,,,,,,,,,of sweeping under the carpet.You also said will assume with no email reply by 9.00 am 28.7.2017 there would be no reply and can do my appeal to you.

Further you sent correspondence if doing appeal had to enclose a police appeal form. Can you confirm on the 24.7.2017 you had no police appeal form, however you maintain email of the 22.7.2017 was final appeal, although you admit from letter 5.12.2017 I would do appeal on after the 28.7.2017 if you ignored email of the 22.7.2017 .

Coroner (1675) R v Parker 2 Lev 140

oduces evidence ,,,,on this day defendant in closed prison,,,in your case CORNERSTONE why you went to defendants, if it was criminal offences ,perjury,,,, malfeasance in public office ignoring applications for years, [FEDJCAB] ,,,then could not take TO JCIO as JCIO stated . Follows police advice was wrong to take to JCIO. . This was a IPCC investigation, police [Insp O Mahony ] SCAN 10594 ,,,admit in this IPCC investigation we did not follow IPCC regulations, and admit my email of 22.7.2017 ,,,it can not be an appeal,,,,,,

Further police state told from HMCS [Bristol county court ] judges immune from prosecution, however ask police in the FEDJCABcomplete document as I went through complete document, was this pasted to you

t take TO JCIO as JCIO stated . Follows police advice was wrong to take to JCIO. . This was a IPCC investigation, police [Insp O Mahony ] SCAN 10594 ,,,admit in this IPCC investigation we did not follow IPCC regulations, and admit my email of 22.7.2017 ,,,it can not be an appeal,,,,,,

Further police state told from HMCS [Bristol county court ] judges immune from prosecution, however ask police in the FEDJCABcomplete document as I went through complete document, was this pasted to you

QUESTION 6 TO POLICE WAS CITED DOCUMENT BELOW IN PRE ACTION PROTOCOL FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW FROM CPS DOCUMENT FEDJJCAB complete SENT TO YOU IN PRE ACTION PROTOCOL DOCUMENT SO AWARE JUDGES NOT IMMUNE[ CPS LIST OF PEOPLE CONVICTED]




Coroner (1675) R v Parker 2 Lev 140

Constable (1703) R v Wyatt 1 Salk 380

Accountant in the office of the Paymaster General (1783) R v Bembridge 3 Doug K.B. 32

Justice of the Peace (1791) R v Sainsbury 4 T.R 451

Executive or ministerial officer (1819) R v Friar 1 Chit.Rep (KB) 702

Gaoler (1827) R v Cope 6 A%E 226

Mayor or burgess (1828) Henly v Mayor of Lyme 5 Bing 91

Overseer of the poor (1891) R v Hall 1 QB 747

Army officer (1914) R v Whitaker 10 Cr.App.R.245

County Court registrar (district judge) (1968) R v Llewellyn-Jones 1 Q.B.429

Police officer (1979) R v Dytham 69 Cr.App.R.387

Council maintenance officer (1995) R v Bowden 4 All E.R 505

Local councillor (2004) R v Speechley [2004] EWCA Crim 3067

Member of the Independent Monitoring Board for prisons (2010) R v Belton R v Belton[2010]

QUESTION 7 TO POLICE WITH REFERENCE TO YOUR INSP O MAHONYS LETTER SCAN 10594 DO YOU WISH TO ADD ANYTHING FURTHER CONFIRMING IPCC REGULATIONS NOT FOLLOWED.





QUESTION 8 TO POLICE CAN YOU PLEASE CONFIRM MY EMAIL OF 22.7.2017 WAS THE APPEAL TO YOUR DEFENCE ,,,,YOU HAVE NO EVIDENCE OF MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE IGNORING APPLICATIONS FOR YEARS WHICH CAME UNDER WEDNESBURY UNREASONABLENESS eg EVEN IN DOCUMENT SENT TO YOU COURT STATED WE IGNORED YOUR APPLICATIONS COME AND TALK TO US. FROM YOUR LETTER 5.12.2017 CAN I QUOTE,,,

You then emailed in reply 22.7.2017 and accused,,,,,,,,,,,,,of sweeping under the carpet.You also said will assume with no email reply by 9.00 am 28.7.2017 there would be no reply and can do my appeal to you.

DO YOU MAINTAIN EMAIL 22.7.2017 WAS THE APPEAL ?????????????

Question 9 to police summary…. from officers statement allegations ,,,,can you confirm neighbour reported alleged crime to you, travellers vandalising property, can you please confirm when he reported. . Can I ask ,,,,you were aware from allegations of neighbour, of my property being vandalised, when was incident recorded by you, and why did it take 2 weeks to contact me. Further why did it take 2 officers to attend, further considering time sending 2 officers, did you enquire from neighbours if they saw anything. Further will try after your reply to trace boy as witness, neighbour wasting police time, eg place card in shop, with 100.00 award taken from my state pension, if fails could use say Evening Post ,local TV channels leave 100.00 with them from my pension, so they can pay boy after publicity for conviction,,,,waste of police time. Further with your reply can display allegations of neighbour with travellers at library.

QUESTION 10 TO POLICE. YOU WERE INFORMED DO NOT TAKE RESPONSIBIITY FOR LOST MAIL PLEASE DO VIA EMAIL. IN PRE ACTION PROTOCOL , IN ADMINISTRATION COURT IN COURT OF APPEAL YOU HAD CHANCE TO DISPUTE FACTS eg from court of appeal,,, The court via order asked me to serve numerous documents, eg court letter 26.7.2018 order to serve, eg,,,,,,,respondents [police/HMCS] are not required to take any action at the permission stage, unless directed by the court .In all cases however the respondents is permitted and encouraged to file brief written statement setting out any reasons why permission should be refused in whole or in part.,,,,,,, The parties made no statement, as in judicial review application and in pre action protocol document, they accept facts., Can you confirm you issued no correspondence with the courts, if you did can we please have copy,,,,,you accepted facts. From High court judge who saw my website, advised if you had at any stage then Legatt would have awarded costs. Can you further confirm you made no objection to removal of restraining order.

QUESTION 11 TO POLICE ,,PCBird states I contacted HMCS and was told judges/staff at HMCS immune from proceedings, and way to deal with issue, malfeasance [misconduct] in public office ignoring applications for years, was via JCIO , who told you this , can we have date and person who supplied information, see asked 14 times










Goodafternoon,

CAN WE PLEASE DEFINE THIS DOCUMENT AS DOCUMENT DEC 2019

INTRODUCTION , Police ask what questions do you want answered. Sections in attachments relate to ombudsman issue, then overview of the whole, required by lawyers when in court. We have issue as events have taken over where now my MP involved, he requests my address in each contact 31 BIBURY AVE BRISTOL,Bristol Evening Post involved, , HMCS [HM court system] involved ,ombudsman involved , CASE NUMBER C2097203 as we seek further extended answers from you . Further via general election know actual MP, therefore can do this document as we know MP, to send correspondence to. From my website

www.corruptioninbristolcountycourt.com document this named DOCUMENT DEC 2019 posted if facts untrue we await litagation. I make no apology for name dropping , retired district judge, QC a female barrister and judge, and even High court judge ect who contacted,,,,,after seeing my web site. Can I please refer to previous complaint to you, which was removed with apology, as turned out to be complaint against contractor you appointed not police, where settled later positive outcome via litagation. can I refer to email to your Insp O Mahony,,,,,,,,,,,,not only removal and apology, but I stated you did not give me good service, it was EXCELLENT service thank you In that complaint required information relating to historic issue. Where Insp O Mahony kindly supplied information, today we seek more information. So we have todays issue plus historic issue.

1/ Todays present issue complaint , before we return to historic issue,,, left home and about 30 mins later at library realised I had not locked back door. Coming home as going out that evening from library, to lock door, a boy about 12 years old stopped me and stated as soon as you went out, your neighbour came in and vandalised your property, neighbour a few doors away when I came home laughing talking to someone. . Reported matter to police, where officers came after 2 weeks delay . So as no misunderstanding have for say,, Bristol Evening Post recording at Patchway police station, where police told rarely home, gave email address told to email when they wished to contact, today suggest no excuse 2 week delay. . We are told by police, your neighbours property also being vandalised by travellers , on this day, he warned them off, where he reported issue to police. This does not ring true, good relationship with travellers as male officer aware,,,,,,seen him at library, on Fridays travellers for years are at Patchway library on course, where I am every Friday, no conflict.

Question 9 to police summary…. from officers statement allegations ,,,,can you confirm neighbour reported alleged crime to you, travellers vandalising property, can you please confirm when he reported. . Can I ask ,,,,you were aware from allegations of neighbour, of my property being vandalised, when was incident recorded by you, and why did it take 2 weeks to contact me. Further why did it take 2 officers to attend, further considering time sending 2 officers, did you enquire from neighbours if they saw anything. Further will try after your reply to trace boy as witness, neighbour wasting police time, eg place card in shop, with 100.00 award taken from my state pension, if fails could use say Evening Post ,local TV channels leave 100.00 with them from my pension, so they can pay boy after publicity for conviction,,,,waste of police time. Further with your reply can display allegations of neighbour with travellers at library on Fridays. Further can I refer to people in greenhouses should not throw stones, could well be one night travellers may throw brick throw vehicles windows in neighbours forecourt if matter not resolved.

2/ Accept paper can not name anyone, however ask paper to consider running story allegations of travellers vandalising property ,did any see anything ,100.00 award, which I could leave in cash with newspaper

3/ Need to cite historic document of 2017,can I please paste,,,,,,that,,, I had sympathy with police, they did investigate, malfeasance in public office courts ignoring applications for years, perjury issue where contacted Bristol county court, where told judges/ staff immune from proceedings, and way to deal with issue was via JCIO [judicial conduct investigation office], told we can not help you. However as they state, JCIO ,via statute as criminal offences could not investigate,

Perjury /malfeasance in public office is a criminal offence so could not report to JCIO ,

from judicial conduct publication] We cannot investigate Allegations of criminal activity for example, perverting the course of justice , [Eaga case perjury/malfeasance in public office ] (criminal allegations should be directed to the POLICE )

further from CPS [crown prosecution service ] document on malfeasance in public office,,,, HMCS were corrupting and frustrating the judicial process, misleading the police, as we ask police today,in one of questions, ,,as judges convicted,,,eg police mislead by HMCS, ,,,,,one of questions asked today,,,

QUESTION 6 TO POLICE WAS CITED DOCUMENT BELOW IN PRE ACTION PROTOCOL FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW PASTED FROM CPS DOCUMENT FEDJJCAB complete SENT TO YOU AGAIN CITED IN PRE ACTION PROTOCOL DOCUMENT SO AWARE JUDGES NOT IMMUNE[ CPS LIST OF PEOPLE CONVICTED MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE]

· Coroner (1675) R v Parker 2 Lev 140

· Constable (1703) R v Wyatt 1 Salk 380

· Accountant in the office of the Paymaster General (1783) R v Bembridge 3 Doug K.B. 32

· Justice of the Peace (1791) R v Sainsbury 4 T.R 451

· Executive or ministerial officer (1819) R v Friar 1 Chit.Rep (KB) 702

· Gaoler (1827) R v Cope 6 A%E 226

· Mayor or burgess (1828) Henly v Mayor of Lyme 5 Bing 91

· Overseer of the poor (1891) R v Hall 1 QB 747

· Army officer (1914) R v Whitaker 10 Cr.App.R.245

· County Court registrar (district judge) (1968) R v Llewellyn-Jones 1 Q.B.429

· Police officer (1979) R v Dytham 69 Cr.App.R.387

· Council maintenance officer (1995) R v Bowden 4 All E.R 505

· Local councillor (2004) R v Speechley [2004] EWCA Crim 3067

Member of the Independent Monitoring Board for prisons (2010) R v Belton R v Belton[2010]

bent.com

, Entitled to legal aid ,however no one would take on as it involved corruption in the court,,eg ,,,,,,we deal with judiciary every day do not want to take on,had to do judicial review application on my own. We obtain judgement where need advice…….. to show point long lists of legal firms in email ,copied my MP into email , saying if someone could advise to please contact and copy my MP into reply, no replies as before. Position now court has confirmed they would look at new application ,have given reference number , however due to fee required can not even do application myself. Can I refer to human right act under Article 6

126. However, the right in question is not absolute and it may therefore be permissible to impose conditions on the grant of legal aid based in particular on the following considerations, in addition to those cited in the preceding paragraph:

§ the financial situation of the litigant (Steel and Morris v. the United Kingdom, § 62);

§ his or her prospects of success in the proceedings (ibid). ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

In the specific circumstances of a case, the practical and effective nature of the right of access to a court may be impaired, for instance: by the prohibitive cost of the proceedings in view of the individual’s financial capacity:……..

We have watertight case from below , from Insp O Mahonys letter where you will see police admit my claim, .All I have is my state pension, can not afford 528.00.We have moral issue of lawyers, we have barrister who said he would consider papers if a lawyer sent papers to him. We do however need further information, before I take matter into my own hands, as with damage to my property, with further help from paper,,,,, as coming to end of my life, no one now left to give home to where ask paper to give to deserving people. The police are aware historically as taking matters in to my own hands with cardiac arrest while in police custody where moved to hospital Planned cardiac surgery declined, hope to die in police custody, over historic issue, to expose and obtain removal of judges. This is not issue of allegations the whole issue is of FACTS ADMIITTED BY POLICE/HMCS [HM court service] . You may say ,which raises other issues for paper, why not ask lawyer ,via Legal Aid, to act, in 2017 tried told numerous times , NO MORAL FIBER this is issue of corruption at the court we deal with these people every week we do not want to take them on ,,,,went outside area where no help. We have emailed same people again, copied MP asking if someone could please help,with present issue before court of appeal, as we had reply from court of appeal, where Master confirmed he would accept application ,,,,DO WE HAVE A WATERTIGHT CASE TO GO BACK TO COURT OF APPEAL CAN NOT DO MYSELF DUE TO COURT FEE 528.00 breach of Article 6,,,,,,,,,With legal aid could return to court.

So ask questions do I have watertight case, where have most of evidence today, however seeking final nail for Legal aid board. With legal aid they would pay court fees. So will show I have watertight case,will ask MP to send papers to Legal aid board, for granting of legal aid.

If need be at end will take matters into my own hands, eg arrested every week ,before sent to prison. We have friend who is terminally ill, agreed to drive me to police station/court where have 5l tins of paint given to me when she moved by Ms Bowyer please see scan 10573 to throw in doorways to show injustice,,,, in prison,,,,3 ,websites for each judge,,,startes for 99p/year ,,,,, can name judges in websites eg www.HHJCottercorruptand bent.com . Contacted graffiti artist , he has 4 friends on same night different parts of Bristol can paint on public buildings www.corruptioninbristolcountycourt.com,,,,,shoplifting every week to get to prison ,,,,.

4/ As ombudsman and MP stated they can not get involved in court judgements, as you can see already ombudsman issued a reference, In historic case element already had compensation of 150.00 over another element.

THE OMBUDSMAN ISSUE. . The ombudsman process in Appendix 4 Tactically HMCS [HM court service] have made a big mistake, statute ,,,,complain to court,,,,,not satisfied go to Resolver, not satisfied escalate, not satisfied send evidence to your MP to look at merits of case to see if he will refer to ombudsman,,,,,,,,,,,,,,coming up to 2 years, still at Resolver stage, where HMCS wanted to go direct to ombudsman , now inform ombudsman we want to go to escalate stage first. Well you want to go to escalate stage , then I require information to do escalate application. If direct to ombudsman then I would not have input into questions asked, eg can not dictate questions put to HMCS ,the ombudsman would have been conducting his/her investigations as they feel fit. Further seek answers under ,,, The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France , § 37).

Application to Bristol county court 6.12.2017 via email, HMCS stance we did not get and in 2017 HMCS were utterly unaware of possible application. OMBUDSMAN ISSUE eg as not read not considered ask for refund of fee.

FACTS Note sent to HHJCotter with N244 form, eg what I want court to do, please see sample of form in scan N244, where asked to pay fee. Retired district judge advised a new N244 form and application, under

Göç v. Turkey [GC], § 57). Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court ,

Advised to seek information to do application at the court where visit recorded, 5.12.2017, Mr Blair refused to supply evidence needed for my claim to succeed, utter breach of Article 6 eg refused to let me obtain evidence from file

,, The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France , § 37).

Further had printer problem so would do after 5.12.2017, so evidence withheld, from recording just let me see N244 form for record need to leave message on it,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,application, not to be sent to HHJCotter, until amendment sent.

On way home visited library sent email, for years saying to HMCS did you get email.

FOR MR BLAIR

At library BT site has been down , will email tonight at home.

Required as you will see to change a few dates in new revised application eg if sent now third party could say,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,we were not aware until 4.00 pm could not be expected to say today if we wish to add a comment for HHJCotter,

P JONES

Playing Devils Advocate have asked over 10 times to HMCS did you get email,,,court receipt below WHERE WE ASK AGAIN TODAY

Bristol County, E-Filing <e-filing@bristol.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk>

05/12/2017 16:17

1

To:

E-Mail Server <philip.jones88@btinternet.com>

To:

E-Mail Server <philip.jones88@btinternet.com>

Sent

Your email has been safely received by the Bristol County Court

Please retain this email as confirmation that your document has been received.

We will endeavour to process or respond to your email within 5 working days. However please note that if your document requires referral to a Judge you may not get a reply for up to 15 working days.

If your email is regarding a complaint, please allow 10 working days for your concerns to be investigated and a response provided. For further guidance please refer to the EX343 on the Justice Website.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Application emailed 6.12.2017,,,retired judge advised as no reply to 5.12.2017 email to email 7.12.2017,,eg

1/ In application yesterday requested that page one of N244 lodged previously was removed and replaced with document sent to you yesterday. Can you please confirm done.

AGAIN COURT RECEIPT

Bristol County, E-Filing <e-filing@bristol.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk>

07/12/2017 09:59

1

To:

E-Mail Server <philip.jones88@btinternet.com>

To:

E-Mail Server <philip.jones88@btinternet.com>

Sent

Your email has been safely received by the Bristol County Court

Please retain this email as confirmation that your document has been received.

We will endeavour to process or respond to your email within 5 working days. However please note that if your document requires referral to a Judge you may not get a reply for up to 15 working days.

If your email is regarding a complaint, please allow 10 working days for your concerns to be investigated and a response provided. For further guidance please refer to the EX343 on the Justice Website.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Still no reply, as email 21.12.2017 and 29.12.2017,,,CONSIDER MR FOWLERS LETTER YOUR ENQUIRES WILL NOT BE ANSWERED JUST FILED. Consider email of 29.12.2017

For example recorded conversation at court with Mr Blair where i wrote on N244 form amendment would be sent to application, not to sent to HHJCotter until amendment sent, can you please give me a reply to these cited emails above,

DID ANYONE READ THIS EMAIL IF THEY DID AWARE OF NEW APPLICATION AFTER 5.12.2017 YES HHJCOTTER READ EMAIL

Can I refer to Lord Goldring judgement many years ago,,,,utterly legally flawed hearing your appeal without transcript, although getting verdict very badly wrong not reason to grant judicial review,,Srickson v Preston cc [2007] EWCA 1132, and award to Bristol court of 500.00 would be quashed, [never forgiven for judgement] why can Bristol court not issue proper paperwork] As every date wrong in judgement of 9.1.2018, we may ask what drugs/intoxication was Cotter on. , need evidence to do application to Administration court, can I refer to scan Cotter late where Cotter confirms he read email 29.12.2017 so aware of amendment of 6.12.2017 sent.

HOW CAN HMCS STATE WE WERE NOT AWARE OF APLICATIONS THEY HAVE FROM ABOVE COURT RECEIPTS COTTER AWARE OF AMENDED APPLICATION. OR ARE HMCS SAYING RECEIPTS ARE FORGED WE SEEK THEIR REPLIES. OMBUDSMAN ISSUE NOTHING TO DO WITH JUDGEMENTS. SIMPLE QUESTION WERE HMCS AWARE OF APPLICATION. COTTER READ EMAIL 29.12.2017 SO AWARE OF AMENDED APPLICATION.

HMCS WANT TO CALL BLACK IS WHITE I ACCEPT CAN NOT ANSWER MY CORRESPONDENCE,AS THEY CORRUPT AND FRUSTRATE THE JUDICIAL PROCESS,,,,,,IS EMAIL 7.12.2017 ON SYSTEM WE HAVE COURT RECEIPT,,,????????????????? IF THEY ADMIT COMPELLING EVIDENCE AND REPAY FEE THEN AWARE LEGATTS JUDGEMENT AT COURT OF APPEAL IN TATTERS eg IN JUDGEMENT FACTS OF CASE IN COTTERS JUDGEMENT BUT HE DID NOT READ APPLICATION. WE HAVE HAD NUMEROUS BARRISTERS WHO CONTACTED ME ALL OVER THE COUNTRY CITING,,

,,,,,who saw my website,, Sharing v Preston cc [2012] EWHC 515 where clearly Legatt had judged case before looking at facts, ,,,,mind already made up,,,,,REASON TO GRANT APPLICATION BACK TO THE COURT.We have had High court judge asking question,,,,is this public school boy judges protecting their own. From Sharing,, The ‘fair minded and independent bystander’ test used here should clearly be in the mind of any representatives who feel that they have been effectively rejected without serious hearing an appeal –REJECTED ON JUDGEMENT OF COTTER BUT COTTER DID NOT READ APPLICATION ,,,WHAT DID HE READ A DOCUMENT HE PRODUCED,,,FURTHER COTTERS JUDGEMENT ON FACTS WRONG eg WHY I WENT TO POLICE.

5/ Can I cite female QC barrister and judge who saw my website, who stated there is cornerstone issue in cases [Cotters is that I went to police malfeasance in public office as dissatisfied with judgements of HHJDenyer, one of questions asked to police do you have any evidence to show this,,,NO ] barrister stated say I am sitting as a judge, [of course would never come to hearing] defendant seen leaving bank after robbery, at hearing Counsel for defendant states not my client on this day, my client in closed prison, in your case why you went to police, cornerstone issue, If it was malfeasance in public office, ignoring applications for years, and Eaga perjury issue, both criminal offences, so police advice we can not investigate, take to JCIO [judicial conduct investigation office] was wrong, and Cotters judgement in TATTERS.,,,,NOT VEXATIOUS TO MAKE ALLEGATIONS AGAINST POLICE JCIO via statute state can not investigate they are criminal allegations as they confirmed, via statute can not investigate, .

Barrister told me to report matter to police malfeasance in public office HMCS ignoring applications for years, plus Eaga perjury issue, Sgt Price asks for CPS [crown prosecution service ] document on malfeasance in public office and to explain my complaint, later defined the FEDJCAB complete document, a subsection defined FEDJCAB document [fatal evidence document judiciary corrupt and bent] eg

CPS DOCUMENT IN BLACK PASTE,,,, MY COMMENTS WERE IN RED as FORMAT sent to Sgt Price WHY I WENT TO POLICE

SCOPE OF OFFENCE ,,,Misconduct in public office is an offence at common law ,,,,,,,office confined to those that are public office holders and is commited when the office holder acts or fails to act in a way that constitutes a breach of the duties of that office. ,,,,,,,he is judge HHJDenyer that deals with appeals, there is no doubt he failed to act when appeals/appications are sent to him to pervert the course of justice. DEFINITION OF OFFENCE wilfully neglects to perform his duty and/or wilfully misconduct himself ,,,,,,,,,he failed to perform his duty by ignoring my applications PUBLIC OFFICER ,,,,judges defined as officer,,,,,ACTING AS SUCH ,,,,,,,must be direct link between the misconduct and an abuse ,misuse or breach of the specific powers and duties of office of position ,,,,HHJDenyer deals with appeals, direct link he is ignoring applications WILFULL NEGLECT MISCONDUCT ,,,,,the wilful act or misconduct can be a result of a positive act, or a failure FAILURE IGNORING MY APPLICATIONS.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

applications WILFULL NEGLECT MISCONDUCT ,,,,,the wilful act or misconduct can be a result of a positive act, or a failure FAILURE IGNORING MY APPLICATIONS.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

AlSO SENT TO POLICE LETTER SCAN APPENDIX 9 enclosed

Pre action protocol document for judicial review had to be produced via statute please see scan Annex A. [my application paragraphs]

5/ DETAILS OF MATTER,,, The issue for years applications to Bristol county court [ BCC ]ignored, although enclosed with application is court order to make application to the court, scan 10389, [SAME REFERENCE TODAY] to then forward to a judge. You will see from this practice historically a miscarriage of justice, eg my copy applications date/stamped by court, please see appendix 2 [SAME REFENCE TODAY] with judgement in papers ,,,no evidence he asked for oral hearing to correct, and could not appeal, as a barrister stated where are we Russia/China. .with appendix 2 plus other documents in bundle. , . On the 23.11.2016 Bristol county court confirmed they would ignore applications, malfeasance in public office. Picketing at court before barrister told me to stop make complaint to defendants,[eg police] warned they may try to brush you off, please see below ,under UK COP WATCH, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

7/ THE ISSUE

BCC [Bristol county court ] for years ignoring applications, criminal offence malfeasance in public office, .resulting in one incident of miscarriage of justice. Complaint to defendants [POLICE] who refuse to investigate.

ALSO FROM PRE ACTION PROTOCOL STATUTE ANNEX A TITLE

11/ THE DETAILS OF ANY DOCUMENT CONSIDERED RELEVANT AND NECESSSARY ,,,

BCC [Bristol county court] Applications 1 and 13.2.2013, 26.2.2016 2.3.2016 26.10.2016 if a reply to application could you please confirm in email, then send copy.

SO TRYING TO CONFIRM FOR YEARS APPLICATIONS IGNORED 1 AND 13.2.2013 RELATE TO SCAN APPENDIX 2.

.In questions asked today we say to police/HMCS was FEDJCABcomplete in pre action protocol for judicial review , was via statute pre action protocol document paragraphs titles denoted by CPR was par 5 and 7 and 11 citings above in pre action protocol document. We then ask was Cotter denying evidence in front of him, utter breach of Article 6 . ,,,,,,,,,, or to falsely deny their existence, this would have the effect of denying them a fair hearing, in violation of Article 6 § 1 ....

Obligation incumbent on the administrative authorities: the appellant must have access to the relevant documents in the possession of the administrative authorities, if necessary via a procedure for the disclosure of documents (McGinley and Egan v. the United Kingdom, §§ 86 and 90). Were the respondent State, without good cause, to prevent appellants from gaining access to documents in its possession which would have assisted them in defending their case, or to falsely deny their existence, this would have the effect of denying them a fair hearing, in violation of Article 6 § 1 ....

Can I refer to actual judicial review application,,,,

The issue with police ,,,,,,perjury issue [Eaga case] and court staff /judges ignoring applications, and correspondence, ignored,,,, McGinley v UK,,,,,,breach withholding documents which would have assisted with case...Ruiz-Mateus v Spain ,,,,,to have knowledge of and comment on all evidence adducted or observations filed... resulting in miscarriage of justice, perverting course of justice, In 2YJ03757 we know application made for oral hearing , from recording with Mr Blair at Bristol court office Mr Till sent to the Administration court Cardiff, he has court order to send to HHJDenyer did he ignore order, malfeasance in public office, or did he send to HHJDenyer who ignored, did Administration court obtain, we suggested to police could they get local police to obtain file, ,,,,we know lawyer could not get a oral hearing, we asked police,,,,,have you talked to lawyer, ,,,,have you talked to Pro Bono Unit, ,,,,,,please see details in text. .Are these chronic events, Mirojuhys v Latvia …………………fairness of proceedings always assessed by examining them in entirety [malfeasance in public office] that an isolated incident may not be sufficient to conclude proceedings as a whole unfair…. ,,,,,,consider even 2018 issues, where even today applications ignored.

THIS IS NOT APPLICATON AGAINST COURT

You will see simple question to police did I come to you malfeasance in public office as courts for years ignoring applications, we ask police/HMCS are above in file for pre action protocol document, we ask police do you have any evidence I came to you as malfeasance n public office as dissatisfied with judgements of Denyer. Look at police letter scan 10594 where Insp O Mahony confirms recorded call with police we did not know offender, was it HMCS staff who did not send applications to Denyer, or Denyer. Consider above application in judicial review,,,, . ,,,,,,consider even 2018 issues, where even today applications ignored.

BUT DENYER RETIRED IN 2017 SO MY APPLICATION CAN NOT RELATE TO DISSATISFACTION OF DENYER,,,,IT STATES ,,,,even today applications ignored.

6/ Application in judicial review..

The Queen on the application of PHILIP JONES

Versus ,,,,CHIEF CONSTABLE AVON AND SOMERSET POLICE

SYNOPSIS ,,,SOLE ISSUE WHAT WE ARE ASKING CAN DEFENDANTS IGNORE STATUTORY IPCC REGULATIONS ON INVESTIGATION [grounds 1 in judicial review application page 4] AND WHEN AGAIN IN STATUTORY REGULATIONS I CAN APPPEAL,[grounds 2 in judicial application page 4/5] ,,,,SEND REPLY TO AN APPEAL I HAVE NOT LODGED. AS ONE LAWYER STATED WHERE ARE WE CHINA/RUSSIA. [IPCC state police inform us you lodged an appeal, only route a judicial review you will see in police letter they state you emailed us on the 22.7.2017 asking questions to do appeal, you stated WITH NO REPLY BY 28.7.2017 YOU WOULD ASSUME QUESTIONS WOULD NOT BE ANSWERED AND WOULD DO APPEAL ON/AFTER 28.7.2017. IN REPLY TO THAT EMAIL ,,,,24.7.2017 DEFENDANTS ALLEDGE THAT EMAIL 22.7.2017 WAS THE APPEAL] WHERE ARE WE CHINA/RUSSIA [end of quote]

Can I refer to IPCC [independent police complaints commission] regulations

Regulations IPCC in a police investigation.

Contact to make sure have all details

Ask what you want to happen

Inform you what is likely to happen

Talk to you about way they will deal with your complaint

Let you know the outcome when they have finished , do in person or on phone ,BUT should also write to you

Can I refer to scan 10594 where police admit IPCC regulations not followed,in this IPCC investigation, eg Galloway never talked to me. Can I refer to scan 10475 10494 where police admit on the 22.7.2017 I state in email ,, with no replies to 11 questions, eg have you contacted lawyer whose application ignored, , have you talked to my MP, .look at scan Appendix 2 ect , whose application to court also ignored, would do appeal on after the 28.7.2017, ,,what did police state in above letter,,, You then emailed in reply 22.7.2017 and accused,,,,,,,,,,,,,of sweeping under the carpet.You also said will assume with no email reply by 9.00 am 28.7.2017 there would be no reply and can do my appeal to you.

,so email 24.7.2017 can not be an appeal, WAITING FOR REPLY TO 11 QUESTIONS

Can I refer as barrister cited to me,,,case law,,,

JUDICIARY DEFINITION OF JUDICIAL REVIEW. It is not really concerned with the conclusions of that process and whether those were ‘right’, as long as the right procedures have been followed. The court will not substitute what it thinks is the ‘correct’ decision.Simple question were right procedures followed

Can I refer as cited further also in judicial review application ,,,, to local judge and barrister paper on malfeasance[misconduct ]in public office,

The elements [for offence] which can be extracted from the limited case law are: A public officer ,,,,,, Wilfully neglecting to perform her duty or wilfully misconducting herself ,,,,,,, To such a degree as to amount to an abuse of the public’s trust in the office holder ,,,,,, Without reasonable justification or excuse. Despite the criticism, there remains an appetite, at the Law Commission at least, to preserve an offence of misconduct in public office, or create a codified replacement. This appetite comes at least in part from recognition that the offence, at times, is the best description of the criminality involved: the public outrage comes not from the particular details of the misconduct, but from the sense of being wronged by an individual whose duty is to serve the public interest. . Kate Brunner QC

Have i been wronged by police ,,,correlate with actual judicial review application, in a IPCC investigation admit we did not follow IPCC ,regulations ,we never talked to you, scan 10594 and sent a reply to an appeal where admit one not lodged scan 10475 10494,,,eg we obtained your email 22.7.2017 where it stated with no answer to questions, would do appeal on/after the 28.7.2017 EMAIL 22.7.2017 CAN NOT BE AN APPEAL AS POLICE MAINTAIN IN REPLY OF 24.7.2017

SO APPICATION JUDICIARY STATE IS VEXATIOUS ??????????????

POLICE ADMIT FACTS . OR ISSUE FOR EVENING POST ,,,IN A IPCC INVESTIGATION POLICE CAN IGNORE IPCC REGULATIONS AND SEND REPLY TO AN APPEAL WHERE ONE NOT LODGED.can I refer to citing IN TEXT ,,,,,is this High court judges protecting their own.

WE MAY ASK CONSIDER WWW.CORRUPTIONAVONSOMERSETPOLICE.COM IF JUDGEMENT OF COTTER BIGGER LEGATT CORRECT WHY HAVE POLICE NOT STARTED LITAGATION FOR LIBEL.

HMCS … ANSWER QUESTION WE HAVE ASKED IN THIS DOCUMENT BELOW ,,,ASKED FOR NEARLY 2 YEARS AS YOU CORRUPT AND FRUSTRATE THE JUDICIAL PROCESS.

FURTHER ASK POLICE TO ANSWER QUESTIONS

From questions with already obtained evidence from police/HMCS can show Biggers judgement wrong in every aspect. We have restraining order because you appealed these facts. We have further questions in respect to police email also. Look at Biggers judgement,,,the facts of case not in Cotters judgement, did not read application, did not go to police malfeasance in public office as dissatisfied with judgements of Denyer, and you had legal basis of claim.

7/ a/ The references will be sent in further email, we ask for reply to questions by the 14.1.2018. With no replies ask my MP to ask for reply, as would need evidence on merits of claim before he sends papers to the Legal Aid board.

b/ The questions tabulated under questions to HMCS /POLICE in references email can parties please reply as this tabulated document.

c// With replies can do escalate stage to HMCS , before it goes to ombudsman .Today under no circumstances will I be involved in correspondence, just need replies to do escalate stage.

d/ Could parties if reply do via email, if need to do via letter could you please email to confirm letter on its way.

e/ We ask final question to HMCS number 21 We had no reply to question is fee 528.00. Can I refer to HMCS document

Application to vary (amend/change) a judgment (or order), suspend enforcement or suspend a warrant of possession or stay at High Court £50.

Eg to vary, amend order, Master stated HMCS would consider new application.

Can I request CPS that document today is forwarded to a judge. We have in utterly cowardly way Legatt quoting restraining order of 2016, where in 26.2.2016 26.10.2016 and 6.12.2017 applications to remove. We know why ignored, as at hearing DEFENDANTS ASKED THAT JUDGEMENT STATED THIS. THIS REJECTED BY DJWATSON MY 3 APPLICATIONS UNDER

Brumarescu v Rumania ,,,,,fundamental aspect of rule of law is the principle of legal certainty,which requires that when the courts have finally decided an issue then ruling should not be called into question ,,[, I HAD NOT ACTED UNREASONABLY] ,Tregubenko v Ukrain ,,,,,,,calling into question of decision in this manner whether it be by judges or the exeutive ............[did HHJDenyer call judgement into question, as he issues restraining order over issue]

HMCS RECENTLY VIA COMPENSATION PAID 150.00 IF I LODGED AT COURT WOULD THE COURT OBTAIN TRANSCRIPT,,,,IF IT SHOWED APPLICATION REJECTED BY DJWATSON WOULD COURT REPAY THE 150.00

eg GoreWood v Johnson [2000] UKHL 65 ,,,,should not be vexed a second time over same facts when issue determined by the court ,,,,,,,,,,,,,court in utter disrepute if we have different verdicts to same facts [as we have today,]

IS IT ALRIGHT TO JUDGES TO MAKE COWARDLY ATTACKS

We have issue of court of appeal application, as computer crash emailed court to obtain application at conclusion of hearing, again emails ignored. Court states binned after hearing as regulations. Judge advised from a theoretical point of view true, however this was just a warning to back up, if you required offered to pay cost of return there was no reason why your request not made, further if not doing court had duty to inform you, so you could ask for sections you require to be photocopied, with you paying court copy fees. DO YOU HAVE OWN COPY OF APPLICATION IF SO FREE OF CHARGE CAN YOU COPY FILE ACCEPT POSTAGE /PACKING CHARGE

CAN WE PLEASE DEFINE THIS DOCUMENT AS DOCUMENT DEC 2019


INTRODUCTION , Police ask what questions do you want answered. We have issue as events have taken over where now my MP involved, he request address in each contact 31 BIBURY AVE BRISTOL, , HMCS [HM court system] involved ,ombudsman involved , CASE NUMBER C2097203 as we seek further extended answers from you . Further via election know MP, can do this document as we know MP, From my website

www.corruptioninbristolcountycourt.com I make no apology for name dropping , retired district judge, QC a female barrister and judge, and even High court judge ect who contacted,,,,,after seeing my web site. Can I please refer to previous complaint to you, which was removed with apology, can I refer to email to your Insp O Mahony,,,,,,,,,,,,not only removal and apology, but I stated you did not give me good service, it was EXCELLENT service thank you. This was a issue where as I could not move ambulance staff had to break in to remove me to hospital, in hospital for 4 days, coming home just small piece of wood over broken glass, where water entered my home. As Insp O Mahony stated ,ambulance staff contacted us as security issue, we arranged for WHOLE window to be boarded up, however contractors are not police staff, they are independent of police. Of course complaint against police utterly without merit , removed, where matter settled via litagation with contractor. Via regulations Insp O Mahony stated to close case, via regulations need to talk to you , NOTE THIS IN RESPECT TO HISTORIC ISSUE LATER, where I stated due to historic issue would not talk until I obtained reply to questions. In text have questions in respect to your email above, ,however further questions answers required by my MP ombudsman and me. . In terms of this different historic case, we ask questions please see below, plus again asking questions not only to you, but HMCS concerning historic case. The reply in ambulance case in scan 10594 from Insp O Mahony over historic issue, eg reply to my questions. From start must be made clear under no circumstances will there be any discussion, WITH ANY PARTY just require replies please to questions so I can do escalate stage , then we can go to ombudsman, and my MP, over this issue ,,,,ISSUE with ombudsman has NOTHING TO DO WITH COURT JUDGEMENTS, as MP /ombudsman stated if it did they could not help, please note ombudsman have issued reference number already above. The ombudsman process in Appendix 4 Tactically HMCS have made a big mistake, statute proceedure ,,,,complain to court,,,,,not satisfied go to Resolver, not satisfied escalate, not satisfied send evidence to your MP to look at merits of case to see if he will refer to ombudsman,,,,,,,,,,,,,,coming up to 2 years, still at Resolver stage, where HMCS wanted to go direct to ombudsman , now inform ombudsman we want to go to escalate stage first. Well you want to go to escalate stage , then I require information to do escalate application. If direct to ombudsman then I would not have input into questions asked, eg can not dictate questions put to HMCS ,the ombudsman would have been conducting his/her investigations as they feel fit. Further seek answers under ,,, The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France , § 37).




2/ Bristol Evening Post covered in this reply. The present complaint to police relates to vandalisation of my property. Coming home a boy of about 12 stopped me saying, your next door neighbour vandalising your property. Accept paper can not name anyone, however offering 100.00 award if people come forward as witness, eg did anyone see vandalisation taking place. . . Would leave 100.00 cash from my pension with paper. We seek further help from Bristol Evening Post as coming to end of my life, no one now left to give home to where ask paper to give to deserving people. The police are aware historically as taking matters in to my own hands with cardiac arrest while in police custody where moved to hospital Planned cardiac surgery declined, hope to die in police custody, over historic issue, to expose and obtain removal of judges. This is not issue of allegations the whole issue is of FACTS ADMIITTED BY POLICE/HMCS [HM court service] . You may say ,which raises other issues for paper, why not ask lawyer ,via Legal Aid, to act, in 2017 tried told numerous times , NO MORAL FIBER this is issue of corruption at the court we deal with these people every week we do not want to take them on ,,,,went outside area where no help. We have emailed same people again, copied MP asking if someone could please help,with present issue before court of appeal, as we had reply from court of appeal, where Master confirmed he would accept application ,,,,DO WE HAVE A WATERTIGHT CASE TO GO BACK TO COURT OF APPEAL CAN NOT DO MYSELF DUE TO COURT FEE 528.00 breach of Article 6,,,,,,,,,With legal aid could return to court.

Granting of legal aid

123. However, the Convention is intended to safeguard rights which are practical and effective, in particular the right of access to a court. Hence, Article 6 § 1 may sometimes compel the State to provide for the assistance of a lawyer when such assistance proves indispensable for an effective access to court (Airey v. Ireland, § 26).

124. The question whether or not Article 6 requires the provision of legal representation to an individual litigant will depend upon the specific circumstances of the case (ibid.; Steel and Morris v. the United Kingdom, § 61; McVicar v. the United Kingdom, § 48). What has to be ascertained is whether, in the light of all the circumstances, the lack of legal aid would deprive the applicant of a fair hearing (ibid., § 51). [ note ,,,can not get hearing without legal aid due to ,,financial situation of litigant,,,please see 126]


126. However, the right in question is not absolute and it may therefore be permissible to impose conditions on the grant of legal aid based in particular on the following considerations, in addition to those cited in the preceding paragraph:

§ the financial situation of the litigant (Steel and Morris v. the United Kingdom, § 62);

§ his or her prospects of success in the proceedings (ibid). …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

So ask questions do I have watertight case, where have most of evidence today, however seeking final nail for Legal aid board. With legal aid they would pay court fees. So will show I have watertight case,will ask MP to send papers to Legal aid board, for granting of legal aid.

If need be at end will take matters into my own hands, eg arrested every week ,before sent to prison. We have friend who is terminally ill, agreed to drive me to police station/court where have 5l tins of paint given to me when she moved by Ms Bowyer by Ms Bowyer please see scan 10573 to throw in doorways to show injustice,,,, in prison,,,,3 ,websites for each judge,,,startes for 99p/year ,,,,, can name judges in websites eg www.HHJCottercorruptand bent.com . Contacted graffiti artist , he has 4 friends on same night different parts of Bristol can paint on public buildings www.corruptioninbristolcountycourt.com,,,,,shoplifting every week to get to prison ,,,,.


3/ Need to cite historic document of 2017,,,,that,,, I had sympathy with police, they did investigate, malfeasance in public office ignoring applications for years, perjury issue where contacted Bristol county court, where told judges/ staff immune from proceedings, and way to deal with issue was via JCIO [judicial conduct investigation office], we will not help you. However as they state, JCIO ,via statute as criminal offences could not investigate,

Perjury /malfeasance in public office is a criminal offence so could not report to JCIO ,

from judicial conduct publication] We cannot investigate Allegations of criminal activity for example, perverting the course of justice , [Eaga case perjury/malfeasance in public office ] (criminal allegations should be directed to the POLICE )

further from CPS [crown prosecution service ] document on malfeasance in public office,,,, HMCS were corrupting and frustrating the judicial process, misleading the police, as we ask police today,in one of questions, ,,as judges convicted,,,eg police mislead by HMCS, ,,,,,one of questions asked today,,,

QUESTION 6 TO POLICE WAS CITED DOCUMENT BELOW IN PRE ACTION PROTOCOL FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW PASTED FROM CPS DOCUMENT FEDJJCAB complete SENT TO YOU AGAIN CITED IN PRE ACTION PROTOCOL DOCUMENT SO AWARE JUDGES NOT IMMUNE[ CPS LIST OF PEOPLE CONVICTED MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE]




Coroner (1675) R v Parker 2 Lev 140

Constable (1703) R v Wyatt 1 Salk 380

Accountant in the office of the Paymaster General (1783) R v Bembridge 3 Doug K.B. 32

Justice of the Peace (1791) R v Sainsbury 4 T.R 451

Executive or ministerial officer (1819) R v Friar 1 Chit.Rep (KB) 702

Gaoler (1827) R v Cope 6 A%E 226

Mayor or burgess (1828) Henly v Mayor of Lyme 5 Bing 91

Overseer of the poor (1891) R v Hall 1 QB 747

Army officer (1914) R v Whitaker 10 Cr.App.R.245

County Court registrar (district judge) (1968) R v Llewellyn-Jones 1 Q.B.429

Police officer (1979) R v Dytham 69 Cr.App.R.387

Council maintenance officer (1995) R v Bowden 4 All E.R 505

Local councillor (2004) R v Speechley [2004] EWCA Crim 3067

Member of the Independent Monitoring Board for prisons (2010) R v Belton R v Belton[2010]

bent.com


4/ May help in historic issue if we consider a possible skeletal argument to judgement of Legatt LJ , to tease out issues,then to supply more detail. THE OMBUDSMAN ISSUE AS IT WERE ,,JUST A BRICK IN THE WALL………..HOWEVER UTTERLY NOT INVOLVED IN JUDGEMENTS. FATAL TO HMCS. Eg Legatts judgement states facts of case in Cotters judgement , but Cotter did not read application, read wrong papers, .as numerous barristers cited Sharing v Preston cc [2012] EWHC 515 where clearly Legaatt had judged case before looking at facts, ,,,,mind already made up,,,,,as he stated,,,,,facts of case in HHJCotters judgement,,,but this is story HHJCotter made up to corrupt and frustrate the judicial process , ITS WRONG ON FACTS eg why I went to defendants,. Lets clear up an issue of possible HMCS defence , we did not get email of 6.12.2017 application and in 2017 utterly unaware of possible application, sole issue for ombudsman . CITED BY COTTER NOTE SENT IN NOV 2017 HOWEVER ALSO IN PRE ACTION PROTOCOL FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW IT CONTAINED THE ISSUE TODAY

StranGreek v Greece …………..a right to present which they regard as relevant .The right can only be seen to be effective if the observations are actually heard, that is to say considered by the court , have a duty to conduct a proper examination of arguments/evidence adducted by the parties,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Principle whereby a civil claim be capable of being submitted to a judge ranks as one of the universally recognised principles of law……………[FOR YEARS IGNORING APPLICATIONS]


NEXT STEP THE ECHR [eur court of human rights]


So was never an issue over JUDGEMENTS OF HHJDENYER.


MERITS OF APPLICATION BACK TO COURT OF APPEAL

4. 1/ COTTER DID NOT READ APPLICATION OF 6.12.2017 ,READ WRONG PAPERS WHAT DID HE READ. LEGATTS LJ JUDGEMENT STATES FACTS OF CASE IN COTTERS JUDGEMENT BUT HE DID NOT READ APPLICATION. MANY BARRISTERS HAVE CITED, Sharing v Preston cc [2012] EWHC 515 where clearly Legaatt had judged case before looking at facts, ,,,,mind already made up,,,,,as he stated,,,,,facts of case in HHJCotters judgement,,,but this is story HHJCotter made up to corrupt and frustrate the judicial process , ITS WRONG ON FACTS eg why I went to defendants,. We have application via email to HHJCotter, on the 6.12.2017. with replacement N244 form, recording at court 5.12.2017,,,,,N244 old form to be removed, write on N244 form, amendments to follow, where pay court fee,,,,,,Göç v. Turkey [GC], § 57). Furthermore, the appellant must be allowed the necessary time to submit further arguments and evidence to the domestic court , HMCS stance we never obtained application and HMCS in 2017 were utterly unaware of possible application, of 6.12.2017?????????OMBUDSMAN ISSUE as seek refund of fee as application removed. I ACCEPT HMCS CAN NOT ACCEPT OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE AS LEGATT LJ STATES FACTS OF CASE IN COTTERS JUDGEMENT BUT HE DID NOT READ APPLICATION.,, EVIDENCE LATER TO OMBUDSMAN ,,,,SO HMCS,defence ,,,WE WERE UNAWARE OF APPLICATION ??????NONSENCE

Email 7.12.2017 STATED

1/ In application yesterday requested that page one of N244 lodged previously was removed and replaced with document sent to you yesterday. Can you please confirm done.

DID HMCS OBTAIN EMAIL OF 5.12.2017 6.12.2017 and 7.12.2017 SO AWARE OF NEW AMENDED APPLICATION UNDER GOC,,,,,OF 6.12.2017 AND NEW N244 FORM,,,,HMCS STANCE WE DID NOT GET APPLICATION OF 6.12.2017 AND IN 2017 HMCS WERE UTTERLY UNAWARE OF APPLICATIONOF 6.12.2017 YES YOU WERE AWARE AS RETIRED DISTRICT JUDGE SAID NOT JUDICIAL LANGUAGE HOWEVER THE BASTARDS HAVE REMOVED APPLICATION ISSUE FOR OMBUDSMAN eg SEE court receipt

Bristol County, E-Filing <e-filing@bristol.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk>

07/12/2017 09:59

1

Your email has been safely received by the Bristol County Court

Please retain this email as confirmation that your document has been received.

We will endeavour to process or respond to your email within 5 working days. However please note that if your document requires referral to a Judge you may not get a reply for up to 15 working days,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,END OF COURT RECEIPT EVIDENCE


We have recording at court of 5.12.2017 that N244 removed not to send to Cotter, replacement to follow, with amended application.


We have problems with Cotters judgement ,what drugs /intoxication was he on, [reference judgement of Lord Goldring many years ago why can Bristol court not issue proper paperwork] as every date wrong in judgement of 9.1.2018, need evidence to do application to Administration court, can I refer to scan Cotter late



[THIS AS OBTAINED DAMAGED BY ROYAL MAIL CAN I REFER TO RECORDING WITH HMCS DEMANDING FEE IF REPLACED] where Cotter in judgement confirms correct ONE date should have been 29.12.2017 for email, WHICH HE READ ,,,what did it state,,,

Email 29.12.2017 , under ECHR [European court of human rights, ] concept of Equality of arms , where long running issue with concept, with HMCS in cases defendants can get replies same day, my questions just ignored,,,,where for example in AOIBS346 /746 defendants ask questions, where we have replies for example ,,,, Ms Smith,,,,asked court this morning, [same day] ,,Smith court have replied, they state,,,,,,,,,,,where my enquires ignored for years can I quote HMCS Mr Fowler old reply for information to do judicual review ,,,,,,will just be filed this court will not reply just file, as they did 5 7 12 29 dec 2017….utter breach of Article 6 ,,,

The parties should have the opportunity to make known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed (Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France , § 37).

EMAIL 29.12.2017 STATED


For example recorded conversation at court with Mr Blair where i wrote on N244 form amendment would be sent to application, not to sent to HHJCotter until amendment sent, can you please give me a reply to these cited emails above,


Eg was asking did you get emails of 5, 6, 21, 29 of Dec,2017,,


BUT CORRUPT AND BENT COTTER ADMIT HE READ EMAIL OF 29.12.2017 ,,,eg NEW N244 FORM WITH AMENDMENT,,,WE HAVE BEEN ASKING CAN WE SEE N244 CONSIDERED CAN WE SEE AMENDMENT CONDIDERED .HMCS CAN NOT REPLY AS WOULD ADMIT APPLICATION 6.12.2017 OBTAINED. FURTHER IF DID NOT OBTAIN THEN COTTER DID NOT HAVE A N244 FORM eg WHAT I AM ASKING COURT TO DO ,,,DID NOT CONSIDER APPLICATION WHERE I REQUIRE REFUND OF FEE. HMCS CAN NOT REFUND FEE AS LEGATT LJ IN JUDGEMENT STATES FACTS OF CASE IN COTTERS JUDGEMENT. All I would need to do in application Cotter did not read application of 6.12.2017 , Legatt mind already made up states facts of case in Cotters judgement. IN APPLICATION TO LEGATT AWARE OF THIS WHERE ASK FOR ORDER TO LOOK AT FILE TO DO MY APPLICATION,,after my investigations ,,,EG IS EMAILS 7.12.2017 IN FILE ,,,,SCAN 10547 WHICH LEGATT IGNORED TO CORRUPT AND FRUSTRATE THE JUDICIAL PROCESS, AS HIGH COURT JUDGE STATED ,,,,GENERAL PUBLIC MAY ASK IS THIS PUBLIC SCHOLBOY JUDGES PROTECTING THEIR OWN

THR WHOLE CASE FALLS HERE DID NOT READ APPLICATION HOWEVER TO CONCLUDE LEGATT STATES FACTS OF CASE IN COTTERS JUDGEMENT…IS THIS A DOCUMENT COTTER PRODUCED TO CORRUPT AND FRUSTATE THE JUDICIAL PROCESS…


4. 2/ ISSUE DID NOT GO TO POLICE AS MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE AS DISSATISFIED WITH JUDGEMENTS OF HHJDENYER,WE HAVE ROYAL MAIL PROFF OF POSTING WHERE TAPE RECORDING WITH SGT PRICE SENT TO BIGGER WITH FEDJCABCOMPLETE DOCUMENT,,,, ,Can I cite female QC barrister and judge who saw my website, who stated there is cornerstone issue in cases [Cotters is that I went to police malfeasance in public office as dissatisfied with judgements of HHJDenyer, one of questions asked to police do you have any evidence to show this,,,no] barrister stated say I am sitting as a judge, [of course would never come to hearing] defendant seen leaving bank after robbery, at hearing Counsel for defendant states not my client on this day, my client in closed prison, in your case why you went to police, cornerstone issue, If it was malfeasance in public office, ignoring applications for years, and Eaga perjury issue, both criminal offences, so police advice we can not investigate, take to JCIO [judicial conduct investigation office] was wrong, and Cotters judgement in TATTERS.,,,,NOT VEXATIOUS TO MAKE ALLEGATIONS AGAINST POLICE JCIO via statute state can not investigate they are criminal allegations as they confirmed, via statute can not investigate, . Not withstanding this did not go to police as ,,,malfeasance in public office dissatisfaction with judgement of HHJDenyer, can I refer to FEDJCAB document below this in pre action protocol document for judicial review document also the pre action protocol document had to be produced via CPR statute Annex A please see scan annex A paragraphs scan eg par 5 and 7 eg statute define 7/ the issue YES THE ISSUE

AlSO SENT TO POLICE LETTER SCAN 13.4,2017 enclosed APPENDIX 9 THIS IN PRE ACTION PROTOCOL DOCUMENT BEFORE COTTER WHERE HE STATES YOU WENT AS DISSATISFIED WITH JUDGEMENTS OF DENYER BEFORE COTTER/BIGGER HOW DO YOU COME TO JUDGEMENT I WENT AS DISSATISFIED WITH JUDGEMENTS OF DENYER from pre action protocol paragraphs,,,COTTER YOUR CALLING BLACK IS WHITE YOUR CORRUPT AND BENT FROM SCAN ANNEX A STATUTE PARAGRAPHS

5/ DETAILS OF MATTER,,, The issue for years applications to Bristol county court [ BCC ]ignored, although enclosed with application is court order to make application to the court, scan 10389, [SAME REFERENCE TODAY] to then forward to a judge. You will see from this practice historically a miscarriage of justice, eg my copy applications date/stamped by court, please see appendix 2 [SAME REFENCE TODAY] with judgement in papers ,,,no evidence he asked for oral hearing to correct, and could not appeal, as a barrister stated where are we Russia/China. .with appendix 2 plus other documents in bundle. , . On the 23.11.2016 Bristol county court confirmed they would ignore applications, malfeasance in public office. Picketing at court before barrister told me to stop make complaint to defendants,[eg police] warned they may try to brush you off, please see below ,under UK COP WATCH, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,


7/ THE ISSUE

BCC [Bristol county court ] for years ignoring applications, criminal offence malfeasance in public office, .resulting in one incident of miscarriage of justice. Complaint to defendants [POLICE] who refuse to investigate.

ALSO FROM PRE ACTION PROTOCOL STATUTE ANNEX A TITLE

11/ THE DETAILS OF ANY DOCUMENT CONSIDERED RELEVANT A