Concise Beam Software [HOT] Download

Concise Beam is an easy to use program for the design of precast concrete beams. Concise Beam will perform a load analysis and design checks in accordance with the latest edition of ACI 318, CSA A23. 3 & S6, AS3600, or NZ3101. 1. Key code parameters can be customized to simulate other design codes. The beam can be conventionally reinforced, partially or fully pretensioned. It can model any cross-sectional shape and will allow the cross-section to vary prismatically (step-wise) over the length of the beam. A graphical editor allows the user to describe any cross-section, including voids.

Concise Beam currently works in two-dimensions but will also account for torsion along the beam. The user can work in metric or U. S. Customary (Imperial) units, with a variety of individual units (i. e. mm, cm, m), and switch back and forth at will. Libraries of industry standard cross-sections and materials are provided with Concise Beam. The standard libraries can be modified, extended and customized by the user.

Concise Beam Software Download

Download Zip 🔥 https://bltlly.com/2y3Ke3 🔥

RE: Precast Concrete Beam Design for Flexural Capacity rapt (Structural)14 Aug 05 23:06The interpretation I have received from the Australkian code committee on this (it says to check at critical sections) is that any section where the capacity is less than 1.2 Mcr is a critical section for minimum capacity and that it therefore needs to be chcecked at all points in a concrete member. RE: Precast Concrete Beam Design for Flexural Capacity haynewp (Structural)15 Aug 05 07:58Yes, that is the way I think ACI should be applied as well. I think he was trying to take the critical section as just being at midspan. RE: Precast Concrete Beam Design for Flexural Capacity apsix (Structural)16 Aug 05 23:57rapt

Is it just me, or is that an illogical definition of critical section? They should then just state the minimum capacity is required for the full length of the member.

Did you get an explaination where the clause 'This requirement may be waived at some critical sections .....provided....will not lead to sudden collapse...' is appropriate to use?

I have assumed that it could be appropriate in cases such as ground beams where the displacement of a member after cracking is limited.

I'll finish by quoting from AS3600 Supp1-1994;"The intention of this clause is to ensure overall ductile failure of the member and this can be achieved without satisfying the requirement for min. reinf't at every cross-section".

Is this still valid?

Apologies to those not using AS3600. RE: Precast Concrete Beam Design for Flexural Capacity rapt (Structural)17 Aug 05 23:03apsix,

I think the definition is logical if you consider why minimum reinforcement is required and the failure type it is trying to negate. Yes, the clause probably should have said it was needed everywhere except for the need to define the extra part of the clause you then quote.

Yes, the explanation for this part of the clause is that you do not need to supply minimum reinforcement on one face of the beam as long as reinforcement on the other face is sufficient to carry the full load. e.g. you do not need to supply minimum reinforcement over the columns as long as the beam can carry the full loading as a simply supported member, ignoring all comntinuity effects at the columns. THis is only to satisfy ultimate loading. This solution would not work for crack control in the negative moment areas. RE: Precast Concrete Beam Design for Flexural Capacity cooperDBM (Structural)29 Aug 05 10:35I'm in the camp that every section where minimum strength is required should be checked. The problem for ACI prestressed concrete users is that the limit below which minimum strength is required, strength greater than 2 times moment, is much higher than many other codes, and ACI non-prestressed beams, which use strength greater than 1.33 times moment. Therefore longer lengths of a prestressed beam requires minimum strength under ACI. This may be why PCI focuses on critical sections only - though as pointed out above the definition of critical section is open to debate.

As far as Concise Beam is concerned it checks every section by default, since it supports Canadian and Australian codes as well as ACI. In recognition of this debate there is an option in Concise Beam to force the program to only check the critical section (minimum moment to strength ratio). RE: Precast Concrete Beam Design for Flexural Capacity astructurale (Structural)(OP)29 Aug 05 11:08Thanks cooperDBM. When I had discused this with Concise, they pointed me in the direction of the optional check box, and also reminded me about the other codes it checks and what their standards are.

To all:

Thanks for discussing this topic. That's a great part of these forums. These discussions can test your understanding of topics. And it can either confirm your understanding or point out things you had not considered. I've gotten a little of both this time. googletag.cmd.push(function() { googletag.display('div-gpt-ad-1406030293255-2'); }); Red Flag This PostPlease let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

CancelRed Flag SubmittedThank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.

The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Concise Beam is a complex and yet easy to use CAD application that enables users to design and analyze precast concrete beams. The application performs its tasks in accordance to ACI 318, CSAA23.3 and AS3600 codes. Users can model cross-sections to meet their demands as well as create prismatic variations over the length of the beam. Using Concise Beam you can choose from multiple beam layouts such as simply supported beams, cantilevers, load distribution and cast-in-place pours.

TABLE 1. Comparison of this work to the most commonly used beam theories. While the proposed model is limited to planar bending, it offers a geometrically exact description in a single-dimensional equation.

FIGURE 3. Results of the initial value problem, simulated in the beam tangent angle for different external momenta at the free end l=L. The results of the actual initial value calculation of profiles are shown on the left. Additionally, the middle and right columns show the resulting x and y profiles (dashed lines). The large red dots mark the imposed boundary conditions on the curve tangent angle profile and their respective impact in x and y direction. Note that the x and y profiles, as well as the 2D visualization on the top left, are evaluated during postprocessing of the actual simulation results in the curve tangent angle , applying the geometric identities Eq. 11 and respective derivatives.

FIGURE 4. Results of the initial value problem simulated in the beam tangent angle for different external nodal forces at l=0.5. The results of the actual initial value calculation of profiles are shown on the left. A detailed explanation of the illustration is given in the caption of Figure 3.

FIGURE 5. Energy conservation during an FEM simulation of the dynamic curve tangent angle model in a clamped-free scenario, where an external torque is applied to the center of an initially straight beam for 0.5 s. The left plot shows the energy distribution. The right plot shows the energy along the beam at a snapshot taken at t = 1 s.

This is an easy and advanced software for designing concrete beams. Concise Beam software performs load analysis and design review in accordance with the latest version of ACI 318, CSA A23.3 & S6, AS3600.

Its key code parameter can be customized to simulate the design of other codes. Concise Beam is one of the best applications for providing comprehensive concrete beam design solutions that provide designers with 3D CAD design tools and incorporate specific aspects of the concrete beam industry.

Use accurate methods at the right time

Stretch Compatibility Sector Analysis

Evaluation of lateral stability of long beams during lifting and transport

Check string and slip rebar

Transfer analysis, lifting and ultimate stress

Estimation of the movement of deflection, bending and hardness

Follow the well-known methods used in PCI handbook design, CPCI metric manual design and NPCA precast concrete

Upgrade the app regularly with a license

Comprehensive summary report of inputs and outputs

Output results in text report and graph

Save many settings as default

Modified polygon design in editor section

Evaluation of hollow core cutting with filled core

Load distribution (including PCI hollow core distribution)

Analyze each user-defined cross section

Cracked section analysis

Estimation of maximum crack width

Concise Beam is an easy-to-use program for designing precast concrete beams. Concise Beam will perform load analysis and design checks according to the latest version of ACI 318, CSA A23.3 & S6, AS3600 or NZ3101.1. It can model any cross-sectional shape and will allow the cross-section to vary prismatically (in steps) along the length of the beam. The graphical editor allows the user to describe any cross-section, including blanks.

Since then, lasers have come a long way and their design has vastly improved. The 1970s introduced self-leveling and split-beam optics for 90-degree layout work. The 1980s incorporated internal power supplies. In the 1990s, the biggest advancement was achieved with the introduction of laser diodes. The life span of a laser diode is typically 30,000 hours compared to a 300-hour life span of the early helium-neon laser tubes and, for the first time, heat dissipation was not a problem. Initially, there were issues with the laser diodes, including beam strength and optical performance, but the diodes were part of the advancing times in the electronic revolution. Increased availability and lower costs kept the industry moving forward. 2351a5e196