Clash Of Lords

Aye Lords! We'll be updating Clash of Lords on Jan 13th (Server Time). The game will be down for maintenance at around 00:30am and for 3 hours. Please note that several features won't be available until the latest update launches. Update Clash of Lords and we'll send 300 Jewels to your in-game mailbox for free! Happy clashing! New Content: 1. New Aid Hero Effects: The higher an Aid Hero's Enlightenment Level, the more powerful their Aid Skill will be. 2. New Equipment: Devilish Dagger. 3. New Daily Value Pack. 4. Upgrade Skills (Enchant UI) added for Officer Reigndeer, Pyriel, Arachne, Chronokeeper, Chaos Ember, Nightmare Morpho, and Shooting Star. 5. New Hero Costumes Enchantress: Scholar of Magic Stormrider: Illusion Rider Toxic Shaman: Shaman of Souls Balance and Optimizations: 1. Optimized models of some Buildings and Decorations. 2. Active Skill of Nightmare Morpho and Shooting Star will no longer target Walls if there are no enemy Heroes present. The Skills will target the furthest Building instead. 3. Added new goods to the Ring Shop and Alchemy Workshop. 4. Various optimizations and bug fixes.

Senior members of the English Church became involved in cases of possession and dispossession in the later sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries. They sought to exonerate women accused of witchcraft, and their involvement led to the disproving of the efficacy of dispossessions performed by anti-episcopal ministers. Although a number of bishops intervened in witchcraft cases, this work was most assiduously carried out by Richard Bancroft, the Bishop of London and later the Archbishop of Canterbury. In doing so, Bancroft came head to head against the Lord Chief Justice of the Common Pleas, Sir Edmund Anderson, and more broadly against judges and justices of the peace who accepted the veracity of cases of possessions and accusations of bewitchment. Particular cases therefore reveal themselves as occasions where episcopacy and judiciary clashed. However, these should not be read as cases of the Church versus the law. The Church was part of the law, in terms of contemporary understandings of the origin of divine positive law. But the cases do suggest that episcopal actions against dispossessing ministers created opportunities to propagandize against the episcopate and the justice it delivered via the High Commission. Accordingly, Bancroft became involved in these cases because they were opportunities for bishops to assert the authority of their order and the High Commission against their opponents' polemic, and they were a means to articulate the scope of episcopal authority.