If you want a behind-the-head headset with a microphone and long stated music runtime for video calls, choose CHUYI Earphone Over Ear; if you need a low-profile, non-in-ear design for listening while lying on your side, choose MZQYRVK Non in-Ear Sleep. For everyday calls, CHUYI’s on-ear hooks and call-focused features make it the more practical pick; MZQYRVK is built around comfort and noise reduction, not an advertised call microphone.
CHUYI Earphone Over Ear vs MZQYRVK Non in-Ear Sleep at a Glance
• MZQYRVK Non in-Ear Sleep: A low-profile, hollow design intended to sit without plugging the ear canal, with claimed hybrid noise cancellation and up to 80 hours of total playback with its case. Trade-off: the product details don’t specify a call microphone or a comparable call-control feature set.
• **Choose CHUYI for calls, walking, workouts, and a headset you can hang around your neck; choose MZQYRVK for side-sleep listening, travel, and a more discreet fit.
CHUYI’s defining feature is its behind-the-head band with on-ear ear hooks. That gives it a different feel from small earbuds: the headset rests around the back of the head, while the hooks help keep the earpieces in place. The frame is described as foldable and made with titanium-alloy steel wire, and it can be placed on a desk or worn around the neck when not in use. That design is a sensible match for people who want a headset they can take off quickly without putting tiny earbuds away.
For video calls, CHUYI has the more relevant listed features. It includes a high-sensitivity microphone described as noise reducing, along with hands-free calling and controls for call management. Its Bluetooth connection is specified with a range of up to 33 feet. The product also lists a 27 mm audio unit and a 300 mAh rechargeable battery, with up to 23 hours of music playback and a charging time of about one to two hours. Those figures are for music playback, so they shouldn’t be treated as a guaranteed call runtime.
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Updated: 2026-10-19 · 6 min read · Independent comparison
I’d consider CHUYI if calls are a regular part of your workday and you prefer on-ear headphones for video calls over a small earbud tucked into the ear. Its stated call microphone and physical headset controls make it the clearer fit for that job. I’d skip it if your main goal is a flat, barely noticeable option for sleeping on your side: the over-ear hooks and wraparound band are a more substantial design.
MZQYRVK is designed around a different problem: listening without a conventional earbud tip filling the ear canal. Its hollow, low-profile shell is described as following the curve of the ear, with a shape intended to reduce pressure and pillow contact for side sleepers. That makes it the more targeted option for someone who wants audio for bedtime, quiet listening, or an airplane trip without a typical plugged-in fit.
Its feature list emphasizes noise reduction and extended listening. MZQYRVK claims up to 42 dB of hybrid active noise cancellation and describes the design as limiting sound leakage. Bluetooth 5.3 is listed, along with a 33-foot range. The advertised 80-hour playback figure is total playback with the charging case; it is not a single-charge earbud runtime. The case has a digital display for the power levels of the earbuds and case.
The trade-off is that the listed details focus on sleep, music, white noise, podcasts, and audiobooks rather than calls. They don’t specify a microphone or dedicated call controls, so I wouldn’t choose MZQYRVK as my first pick for frequent video meetings. Also, while the product is described as non-in-ear in its name and design claims, the product-information fields classify the ear placement as in-ear. If avoiding any in-ear-style fit is essential, that inconsistency is worth checking before deciding.
• Best for video calls → CHUYI Earphone Over Ear. Its listed high-sensitivity microphone, hands-free calling, and call-management controls give it the stronger call-focused feature set.
• Best for stated music playback from the headset itself → CHUYI Earphone Over Ear. It lists up to 23 hours of music playback, while MZQYRVK’s 80-hour figure includes its charging case.
• Best for a longer claimed total with a case → MZQYRVK Non in-Ear Sleep. Its total playback claim is 80 hours with the case, though that is not the same measure as CHUYI’s headset-only figure.
• Best for a behind-the-head fit that can hang around your neck → CHUYI Earphone Over Ear. Its wraparound frame is described as foldable and wearable around the neck when not in use.
• Best for listed active noise cancellation → MZQYRVK Non in-Ear Sleep. It claims 42 dB hybrid ANC; CHUYI’s microphone noise reduction is a call feature, not the same claim.
• Best for audio during movement → CHUYI Earphone Over Ear. Its ear hooks are intended to hold the headset in place for activities such as running or riding outdoors.
• Best for calls on the go versus sleep audio → CHUYI for calls; MZQYRVK for sleep and listening. Their stated priorities are different, so the right fit depends on which task matters more.
My Verdict
I’d choose CHUYI Earphone Over Ear for a headset that needs to handle regular video calls as well as music and everyday movement.
The microphone, call controls, and behind-the-head fit make it the more practical all-around call option on the listed features.
MZQYRVK is the more purpose-built choice for side-sleep listening, but its product details don’t establish the same call capability.
For my needs, the best headphones for video calls here are CHUYI—not because it covers every use case, but because calls are the deciding one.
CHUYI lists a high-sensitivity microphone, hands-free calling, and call-management controls, so its stated features suit calls more directly. The product information doesn’t provide a separate call-runtime figure.
It can connect over Bluetooth, but its listed features emphasize sleep audio, music, podcasts, and noise cancellation. The details provided don’t specify a microphone or dedicated call controls, so CHUYI is the clearer choice for frequent meetings.
MZQYRVK claims up to 42 dB of hybrid active noise cancellation. CHUYI lists noise reduction for its microphone, which concerns call audio and isn’t the same as an ANC specification for listening.
MZQYRVK is the one that claims hybrid ANC, while CHUYI is the one with the more explicit call-focused features and a fit intended to stay in place during movement. Neither product’s listed details establish a combined ANC-and-sports-call advantage, so choose based on whether noise cancellation or call controls matter more.
• Bulktech 5 vs AHFYCIH USB Headphone
• LOBKIN Open Ear Earbuds vs Groovz Plus True
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.