back to previous page
👩🏻(prompt): Could you evaluate the result generated by computational method A based on these three aspects: Main entities, main events, event linkage. Result would be provided as screen shot. Please provide precision and recall for the three criteria.
model output
GPT4o Evaluation
🤖(answer): To evaluate the results of the two figures provided, one focusing on individual keyword ranking and the other using network-based community detection to extract top communities, let's break down the evaluation into the following steps:
1. Definitions for Precision and Recall:
Precision: The proportion of relevant instances among the retrieved instances. Here, it measures how many of the identified main entities, events, and linkages are actually correct and relevant.
Recall: The proportion of relevant instances that have been retrieved over the total amount of relevant instances. Here, it measures how many of the actual main entities, events, and linkages the model successfully identified.
2. Evaluation Details
Main Entities:
Keyword Ranking:
The precision for main entities in keyword ranking can be considered high as it includes specific and highly relevant entities to the Israel-Hamas conflict.
Recall is moderate since the keyword ranking captures many main entities but might miss those that are less frequently discussed.
Community Detection:
Precision is slightly lower here, as the community detection method includes more general terms that might not directly relate to specific entities in the conflict.
Recall is moderate to high as the community detection method might capture a broader range of entities by including more general terms.
Main Events:
Keyword Ranking:
The precision for identifying main events is moderate since the ranking might mix up events with other types of information.
Recall is moderate for main events, as some events might be missed due to the focus on frequency rather than significance.
Community Detection:
Precision is lower as the communities might include non-event terms and general concepts, diluting the focus on specific events.
Recall is moderate because while it might capture a range of events, the method might miss some critical ones due to the broad nature of detected communities.
Event Linkage:
Keyword Ranking:
Precision is low to moderate because keyword ranking does not inherently capture linkages between events; it focuses more on individual keywords.
Recall is low because linkages between events are not a focus in keyword ranking.
Community Detection:
Precision is also moderate as communities might suggest connections between concepts, but these are not explicit or clear linkages.
Recall is moderate as some event linkages may be inferred from the communities, but they are not explicitly captured.
3. Quantitative Precision and Recall Estimation:
Given the qualitative assessments, I’ll assign approximate quantitative values:
These values are estimates based on the interpretation of the results. The precision and recall vary depending on how the specific method aligns with each criterion of main entities, events, and linkages.