If you want a wired, in-ear option with a detachable cable, choose CCA ND Planet IEM; if you need wireless, over-ear listening with active noise cancellation, choose SOAR NBA Active Noise. For a computer, the key difference is simple: one connects by cable, while the other uses Bluetooth.
CCA ND Planet IEM vs SOAR NBA Active Noise at a Glance
• CCA ND Planet IEM: Its 3.5 mm wired connection and detachable 2-pin cable suit a straightforward computer setup; the trade-off is that it is an in-ear wired design, not a Bluetooth headset.
• CCA ND Planet IEM is for listeners who want a wired connection, in-ear fit, and an in-line remote with microphone.
• SOAR NBA Active Noise is for listeners who want over-ear headphones, Bluetooth, and active noise cancellation.
• Neither sheet specifies multipoint connectivity, so I would not choose either on the assumption that it can stay connected to two devices at once.
The CCA ND Planet IEM is a wired, in-ear option built around a 12 mm dynamic driver. Its listed frequency range is 20–40 kHz, with 32-ohm impedance and 112 dB sensitivity. Those figures describe the earphones’ audio specifications, but they do not tell me exactly how they will sound with every computer, recording, or music app. I would treat them as a clear description of the hardware, not a guarantee of a particular listening experience.
For computer use, the most practical feature is the 3.5 mm connection. If your computer has a compatible headphone jack, the wired setup avoids Bluetooth pairing and keeps the listening connection independent of headphone battery life. The in-line remote and microphone add a convenient control and voice option on the cable. The cable is detachable and uses a 2-pin connection, which gives it a different construction from a permanently attached cable; the sheet does not state what replacement cables are included.
The rounded-tip in-ear design and passive noise cancellation will appeal to someone who wants earphones that sit in the ear rather than headphones covering it. CCA lists the enclosure material as silicone and the item weight as 65.5 g. That does not establish how a particular listener will find the fit, so the in-ear shape is the important consideration: some people prefer this compact style, while others would rather have padded ear cups.
How We Research
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Updated: 2026-10-24 · 8 min read · Independent comparison
Who should skip it: Skip the CCA if you want Bluetooth, active noise cancellation, or an over-ear fit.
The SOAR NBA Active Noise is an over-ear Bluetooth headphone with active noise cancellation. Its design combines a plastic outer shell and headband with fabric-and-foam ear pads. That gives it a different physical approach from the CCA’s rounded-tip in-ear design: the SOAR surrounds the ears, while the CCA sits in them. If you already know which style you find more comfortable, that distinction may matter more than the connection type.
For a computer, Bluetooth 5.3 makes the SOAR the wireless choice between these two. Active noise cancellation is also a stated feature, which may appeal if you want headphones with a noise-control function rather than relying on the CCA’s passive isolation. The sheet does not describe how strong the cancellation is, how it behaves in specific environments, or whether it can be adjusted, so I would not infer those details from the feature name alone.
The battery fields list both a 40-hour average life and a 40-hour charge time. Those figures are important to consider together: the stated operating time is substantial, but so is the listed charging time. The SOAR also has a 3.5 mm headphone jack, alongside Bluetooth connectivity. The information does not explain whether using that jack changes battery use or how the headphones behave when wired, so I would not assume a particular wired mode beyond the presence of the jack.
Its Los Angeles Lakers color and sports theme make the design specific rather than neutral. The product is described for teens, and it includes a one-year manufacturer warranty. Those details may help a buyer who wants that team styling or values a stated warranty period, but they do not establish how the headphones will fit every adult or teen.
Who should skip it: Skip the SOAR if you want a wired-only setup, a compact in-ear design, or a product whose listed battery charge time is shorter than its stated average battery life.
• Best for a compatible computer’s 3.5 mm headphone jack → CCA ND Planet IEM. Its listed connection is wired, so it does not depend on Bluetooth pairing.
• Best for Bluetooth on a computer → SOAR NBA Active Noise. Bluetooth 5.3 is specified; the CCA is wired.
• Best for active noise cancellation → SOAR NBA Active Noise. It explicitly lists active noise cancellation. The CCA lists passive noise cancellation instead.
• Best for a detachable cable → CCA ND Planet IEM. Its cable uses a detachable 2-pin connection.
• Best for over-ear headphones → SOAR NBA Active Noise. It is designed to sit over the ears and has fabric-and-foam ear pads.
• Best for in-ear listening with a cable microphone and remote → CCA ND Planet IEM. Its sheet lists an in-line remote and microphone.
• Best for a stated battery-life figure → SOAR NBA Active Noise. It lists a 40-hour average battery life, along with a 40-hour charge time.
• Best for a computer setup where battery-free wired listening matters → CCA ND Planet IEM. Its wired design avoids needing headphone battery power for the connection.
The phrase “best open ear headphones for computer” does not describe either design accurately: the CCA is in-ear, and the SOAR is over-ear. Likewise, shoppers searching for the “best multipoint head phones for computer” should note that neither product’s supplied details specify multipoint pairing. If the goal is simply the best Bluetooth headphones for computer use, the SOAR has the relevant wireless connection, but its listed features alone do not establish multipoint support or compatibility with every computer.
Buying Considerations
Think about where you want the headphones to sit. The CCA’s rounded-tip in-ear shape is compact and includes passive noise cancellation, while the SOAR’s over-ear construction uses fabric-and-foam ear pads and active noise cancellation. Those are different approaches, not interchangeable labels for the same experience. Your comfort preference and need for a particular style should guide the choice.
For calls, the CCA is the one that explicitly lists an in-line remote and microphone. The SOAR’s supplied information does not list a microphone, so I would not assume it includes one based only on its Bluetooth connectivity. If voice calls are essential, confirm that feature before choosing the SOAR.
Finally, weigh the SOAR’s stated battery figures against how you plan to use it. Its listed average battery life is 40 hours, and the listed charge time is also 40 hours. The CCA instead uses a wired connection and has no battery figures listed. For someone who prefers not to manage charging, that difference may settle the decision; for someone who wants wireless listening and active noise cancellation, the SOAR’s battery-powered design may be the more appealing trade.
I would buy the CCA ND Planet IEM for a computer if I wanted a direct wired connection, an in-line microphone and remote, and a detachable cable. It is the more straightforward fit for someone who values those features and prefers in-ear earphones.
I would choose the SOAR if wireless, over-ear listening and active noise cancellation mattered more. My overall pick for a computer is the CCA, because its listed 3.5 mm wired connection and microphone make its intended setup easier to judge from the available details.
Choose the CCA if your computer has a compatible 3.5 mm headphone jack and you prefer a wired in-ear design. Choose the SOAR if you want Bluetooth, an over-ear fit, and active noise cancellation.
No. Its listed noise control is passive noise cancellation. The SOAR is the product in this comparison that specifies active noise cancellation.
The SOAR lists a 3.5 mm headphone jack as well as Bluetooth connectivity. The supplied details do not explain how wired use works or whether it affects battery operation, so confirm those points if they matter to your setup.
Neither product’s listed details specify multipoint pairing. The SOAR supports Bluetooth 5.3, but that alone does not establish that it can connect to two devices at once.
• ZIHNIC Active Noise Cancelling vs JLab Graphite Bundle
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.