If you want dependable audio for jogging, choose Boean Headphones; if you need wearable cooling while jogging, choose OVIFM Hanging Neck Fan-Misting. They solve different problems: Boean is an in-ear Bluetooth audio option, while OVIFM is a hands-free neck fan with adjustable airflow and misting. For most runners choosing between sound and cooling, I’d make the decision based on which one matters more on the route.
Boean Headphones vs OVIFM Hanging Neck Fan-Misting at a Glance
• Boean Headphones: Built for wireless listening, with an in-ear fit, IPX7 water resistance, Bluetooth 5.3, and up to 16 hours of battery life. The trade-off is that it provides audio, not cooling, and it does not support smartwatch connection.
• OVIFM Hanging Neck Fan-Misting: Offers hands-free airflow from upper and lower outlets, four advertised fan settings, adjustable direction, and a misting mode. Its trade-off is shorter battery life—up to 4–7 hours depending on settings—and it does not provide headphone audio.
• Choose Boean if your main goal is music, calls, or audio during exercise; choose OVIFM if your main goal is personal cooling without holding a fan.
Boean Headphones are the straightforward choice when the thing you want around your jog is sound. They connect over Bluetooth 5.3 and use 11mm dynamic drivers in an in-ear design. That means they’re meant to sit in your ears, rather than hang around your neck like the OVIFM fan. The stated Bluetooth range is up to 30 feet in open space, though obstacles can reduce that range.
The sports-oriented fit is supported by four pairs of ear caps, so you can choose among the included options rather than being limited to one ear-tip size. The design is described as secure for exercise, and the IPX7 rating addresses exposure to sweat, rain, and splashes. For someone who wants the best in ear headphones for jogging among these two very different products, Boean is the only one that actually plays audio. Its 16-hour stated playtime also gives it a longer listening window than the OVIFM’s stated operating range.
There are useful limits to keep in mind. In-ear sound isolation is part of the design, so these aren’t the choice for someone specifically seeking an open-ear listening style. The product sheet also says they do not currently support smartwatch connections. Who should skip them: Skip Boean if you want airflow, misting, or an open-ear style; these are headphones, not a cooling device.
How We Research
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Updated: 2026-10-22 · 7 min read · Independent comparison
The feature set is centered on personal cooling: the product information describes four fan-speed adjustments, a misting function, and a 4000mAh battery. Its stated runtime is up to 4–7 hours, with actual duration depending on fan speed and whether spray mode is used. The fan and misting functions can operate independently, offering a way to choose between them rather than having to use both at once. A digital display shows the fan speed, misting mode, and remaining battery power, so you can check those settings directly on the device.
OVIFM is not an audio product, despite the “headphone” wording in its product name. It is a wearable cooling fan with a bladeless design, folding storage, and adjustable direction. Those features may appeal to someone seeking neck-worn cooling for an outdoor activity, but the stated battery window is much shorter than Boean’s playtime figure. Who should skip it: Skip OVIFM if your priority is music, calls, or a dedicated pair of running headphones.
• Best for listening to music or other audio → Boean Headphones. They are Bluetooth headphones with in-ear earpieces; OVIFM is a fan. - Best for cooling your face and chest → OVIFM Hanging Neck Fan-Misting. Its upper and lower outlets are designed to send air in both directions. - Best for sweat and rain exposure during a workout → Boean Headphones. Their IPX7 rating is the relevant water-resistance feature in this comparison. - Best for adjusting airflow direction → OVIFM. The neck fan has an adjustable angle and folding design. - Best for checking remaining battery on the device → OVIFM. Its digital display shows battery power, fan speed, and misting mode. - Best in ear headphones for jogging → Boean Headphones. They’re the only in-ear audio option here, with four pairs of ear caps and a sports-focused fit. - Best open ear earbuds for jogging → Neither is a direct match. Boean is explicitly in-ear, while OVIFM is a neck fan rather than an earbud.
The “best ipx7 waterproof gaming headset for jogging” phrase also points toward Boean only in the narrow sense that it has an IPX7 rating and provides audio. The product sheet identifies it as Bluetooth headphones, not a gaming headset, so I wouldn’t treat it as a dedicated gaming model. For the same reason, I wouldn’t call either product an open-ear earbud: the designs and purposes are distinct.
Before choosing, decide whether you want sound or cooling. The two products don’t compete on the same feature. Boean is built around in-ear listening, Bluetooth connectivity, and a longer stated playtime. OVIFM is built around wearable airflow and misting. If you’re planning a jog, that difference matters more than comparing them as if they were two kinds of headphones.
Also think about what you want near your ears. Boean’s in-ear construction and sound isolation suit someone who wants a more contained listening experience. It is not an open-ear design. OVIFM sits around the neck and directs airflow, so it doesn’t fill the audio role or create the same kind of listening experience. Its digital display and adjustable airflow are relevant if managing cooling settings is your priority.
Finally, check the details that matter to your routine. If you rely on a smartwatch connection, Boean’s product information explicitly says that smartwatch connection is not supported. If you want a fan that folds for storage and lets you change airflow direction, those features belong to OVIFM. Neither product replaces the other; your choice should follow the job you want it to do.
My Verdict
In my opinion, I’d buy Boean Headphones for jogging because they directly meet the audio need, have an IPX7 rating, and list up to 16 hours of playtime.
I’d choose OVIFM instead if my main concern were wearable cooling, especially its adjustable upper-and-lower airflow and separate misting option.
For jogging, I’d take Boean when listening matters more than airflow.
I’d take OVIFM only when hands-free cooling is the point.
For audio during a jog, Boean is the relevant choice: it is an in-ear Bluetooth headphone with a stated IPX7 rating. For wearable cooling, OVIFM is the relevant choice, but it is a neck fan rather than headphones.
Boean lists up to 16 hours of playtime. OVIFM lists up to 4–7 hours, depending on fan speed and spray mode, so the products’ battery figures refer to different types of use.
No. It does not list audio playback or Bluetooth headphone connectivity.
The product information says Boean does not currently support smartwatch connection. It connects over Bluetooth, but that does not mean smartwatch pairing is supported.
• ZYHKON Sleep Earbuds vs Lunvaxo Mini Invisible Headphones
• JBL Quantum 200 vs Wisoqu Gaming Headset
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.