If you want a closed-back fit that helps isolate you from room noise, choose beyerdynamic DT 770; if you need an open, airy presentation for hearing detail, choose Sennheiser HD 560S. For TV watching, the DT 770 is the more sensible pick in a shared or noisy room, while the HD 560S suits quieter listening where an open design is welcome.
beyerdynamic DT 770 vs Sennheiser HD 560S at a Glance
• beyerdynamic DT 770: Closed-back design helps block ambient noise; its 250-ohm impedance calls for suitable audio equipment.
• Sennheiser HD 560S: Open-back design and angled driver alignment support a broad, detailed presentation; it does not isolate you from the room.
• DT 770 connection: Wired, with a 3-meter coiled cable and a 3.5 mm jack plus a threaded 6.35 mm adapter.
• HD 560S connection: Wired, with a 6.3 mm jack and a 3.5 mm adapter; its listed impedance is 120 ohms.
• Choose the DT 770 if you want closed-back isolation and a cable that can extend when needed.
• Choose the HD 560S if you want an open design for analytical listening in a quieter space.
The DT 770 is the more straightforward choice when you want your headphones to reduce the distraction of surrounding sound. Its closed-back design is intended to block ambient noise, which can be useful when the TV is on in a busy household or you want to focus on a program without as much room sound competing for attention. That same closed construction makes it the more practical of these two for listening near someone who would rather not hear an open headphone’s sound.
The 250-ohm version is aimed at pro studio interfaces, home hi-fi equipment, and audiophile systems. That number matters: the product information cautions that a poor equipment pairing can result in quieter sound and less bass. I would check the output connection and driving capability of the device you plan to use before choosing it for a television setup. The 3-meter coiled cable can stay relatively tidy nearby and stretch when you move farther away, while the included 3.5 mm connection and threaded 6.35 mm adapter offer two plug formats.
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Updated: 2026-10-18 · 6 min read · Independent comparison
Its over-ear velour pads and lightweight design are intended for extended wear, and its components are described as replaceable. I’d choose the DT 770 if isolation, a long coiled cable, and replaceable parts matter more than an open presentation. I’d skip it if your TV has a connection that may not suit a 250-ohm headphone, or if you specifically want the airy character of an open-back design. It is wired, so it is not a pick for someone who needs freedom from a cable.
The HD 560S is an open-back, over-ear headphone built around a natural, analytical sound. Its angled driver alignment is designed to create a wide, articulate soundstage, and the tuning is intended to make details and differences in audio easy to hear. For TV watching, that could suit someone who values clearly presented dialogue, music, and soundtrack detail in a quiet room and does not need to shut out surrounding noise.
The open cups are ventilated, and the velour earpads are designed for a soft contact feel. The listed weight is 240 grams, and the impedance is 120 ohms. It uses a 6.3 mm plug with a 3.5 mm adapter, so check which connection your TV or audio equipment accepts before buying. Like the DT 770, it is wired and has no listed noise-control feature.
I’d consider the HD 560S if you listen in a calm space, want an open design, and care about a revealing, analytical presentation for shows, games, or music. I would not pick it for a noisy room or a setting where keeping headphone sound to yourself matters: an open-back design does not offer the DT 770’s stated ambient-noise blocking. The product information also highlights high-frequency detail, which may appeal to listeners who want to hear more nuance, but may be less appealing if they prefer a more isolating experience.
• Best for reducing room distractions → beyerdynamic DT 770. Its closed-back construction is specifically intended to block ambient noise.
• Best for an open, spacious presentation → Sennheiser HD 560S. Its open-back design and angled drivers are intended to produce a broad soundstage.
• Best for a shared or busy room → beyerdynamic DT 770. Isolation is the clearest design advantage here, though it is not a guarantee that no outside sound will reach you.
• Best for analytical listening in a quiet room → Sennheiser HD 560S. Its tuning is aimed at accuracy and making details easy to discern.
• Best if your gear has a 6.3 mm headphone output → Sennheiser HD 560S. It comes with a 6.3 mm plug and a 3.5 mm adapter.
• Best if you want a coiled 3-meter cable → beyerdynamic DT 770. Its cable is designed to stay close when you are near equipment and extend when needed.
• Best if replaceable components matter → beyerdynamic DT 770. Its product details specifically describe robust, replaceable components.
• Best for a cooler-feeling open cup design → Sennheiser HD 560S. Its ventilated cups are designed to stay cool without touching the ears.
My Verdict
I would buy the beyerdynamic DT 770 for TV watching if my priority were listening with more separation from a busy room. Its closed-back design, coiled cable, and replaceable components make a convincing combination for that use, provided my audio equipment can handle 250 ohms.
I’d choose the Sennheiser HD 560S instead for a quiet room and an open, detail-focused presentation. My deciding factor is isolation: for the typical household where outside sound can be distracting, I’d give the DT 770 the edge.
For a room where you want help blocking ambient noise, the DT 770 is the more suitable design because it is closed-back. The HD 560S is the better fit if you prefer an open presentation and listen in a quieter setting.
Both are wired, but their plug arrangements differ. The DT 770 has a 3.5 mm jack with a threaded 6.35 mm adapter; the HD 560S has a 6.3 mm plug with a 3.5 mm adapter. Check your TV or audio system’s output connection.
The version covered here has a 250-ohm impedance and is intended for pro studio interfaces, home hi-fi, and audiophile systems. Its product information warns that an unsuitable pairing can lead to quieter sound and less bass, so confirm compatibility with your audio source.
The DT 770 is the more appropriate of the two when you want to reduce sound exchange with the room: it has a closed-back design intended to block ambient noise. The HD 560S has open-back cups, so it is better reserved for a setting where that open design is not a concern.
• BANIGIPA Kids Headphones vs TOZO HT3
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.