This question assesses your ability to:
Evaluate texts critically and support this with appropriate textual references.
In this question, you should be evaluating the text (may be the entire text or a significant section of it) and explain to what extent you agree with a statement made by a student. The purpose of this question is to see if students can utilise language and structural techniques to explain how a writer conveys or builds an idea throughout the text and evaluate how successful the author is.
Suggested time: 20 minutes
Top tips:
Make sure you use short, precise quotes in your response to ensure that you can support your answer.
Ensure you use language and structure techniques in your answer to help analyse the text.
Give your opinion - there is no judgement, but you do need to give an opinion and support it with evidence.
Remember to focus on the question and link your ideas back to that statement (and how they agree or disagree with it).
It's okay to be somewhere in the middle; I somewhat agree, the [student] is partially correct, I mostly disagree...
Remember to use What How Why in your response (you do not need to link to context in this question).
Short, snappy sentences
Short, simple sentences
Long, complex sentences
Short paragraphs
Long paragraphs
Dialogue
Description
Action
Shift in focus
Shift in topic
Shift in time
Shift in character
Zoom out
Zoom in
Exposition
Rising Action
Climax
Falling Action
Resolution/Denouement
Inciting Incident
Connectives
Repetition
In media res
1st person/2nd person/3rd person POV
Past/present/future tense
Temporal references (references to time)
Withholding information
Endings
Order of the events
Flashback
Flashforward
Circular narrative
Justaposition
Chronological structure
Rule of 3
Direct speech
Simile
Metaphor
Onomatopoeia
Alliteration
Sibilance
Sensory Language
Emotive Language
Repetition
Asyndetic List
Oxymoron
Hyperbole
Personification
Pathetic Fallacy
Assonance
Consonance
Colloquial language
Dialect
Dialogue
Dissonance
Imagery
Irony
Pathos
Rhyme
Symbolism
Lexical (Word) Choice
Semantic Field
Need some revision to build your confidence with these techniques? Try the links below.
For the reading section of this exam, we recommend students adopt a What How Why writing structure, to help them effectively communicate their thoughts and analysis. For this question, students should focus on the writer's use of language. Your question will always have a focus. Once we've identified the focus, then we can start to use the What How Why structure to begin a response. This will vary depending on the focus, but it could look like:
What is your opinion about the focus? What is the writer suggesting with the focus?
How has the writer used words and phrases? How have they used language devices? How have they used structure?
Why is it effective? Why does it make an emotional response in the reader?
Let's look at the example in the question below, "In this part of the story, where Zoe and Jake are caught in the avalanche, it sounds really dangerous.", the focus of the question is the sense of danger. So our What How Why would look something like:
What is the danger? What does the writer want us to understand about the dangerous situation?
How has the writer used words and phrases to show the danger? How has the writer used language devices to create a sense of danger? How has the writer structured the work to create a sense of danger?
Why is it effective in showing the danger? Why does this make us care about the characters in danger?
This extract is from the beginning of a novel by Graham Joyce. A young married couple, Zoe and Jake, are on a skiing holiday in the French Pyrenean mountains.
[...]
But at the edge of the slope, near the curtain of trees, she felt a small slab of snow slip from underneath her. It was like she’d been bucked, so she took the fall-line* to recover her balance. Before she’d dropped three hundred metres, the whisper of her skis was displaced by a rumble.
Zoe saw at the periphery of her vision that Jake had come to a halt at the side of the piste and was looking back up the slope. Irritated by the false start they’d made, she etched a few turns before skidding to a halt and turning to look back at her husband.
The rumble became louder. There was a pillar of what looked like grey smoke unfurling in silky banners at the head of the slope, like the heraldry of armies. It was beautiful. It made her smile.
Then her smile iced over. Jake was speeding straight towards her. His face was rubberised and he mouthed something as he flew at her.
‘Get to the side! To the side!’
She knew now that it was an avalanche. Jake slowed, batting at her with his ski pole. ‘Get into the trees! Hang on to a tree!’
The rumbling had become a roaring in her ears, drowning Jake’s words. She pushed herself down the fall-line, scrambling for traction, trying to accelerate away from the roaring cloud breaking behind her like a tsunami at sea. Jagged black cracks appeared in the snow in front of her. She angled her skis towards the side of the slope, heading for the trees, but it was too late. She saw Jake’s black suit go bundling past her as he was turned by the great mass of smoke and snow. Then she too was punched off her feet and carried through the air, twisting, spinning, turning in the white-out. She remembered something about spreading her arms around her head. For a few moments it was like being agitated inside a washing machine, turned head over heels a few times, until at last she was dumped heavily in a rib-cracking fall. Then there came a chattering noise, like the amplified jaws of a million termites chewing on wood. The noise itself filled her ears and muffled everything, and then there was silence, and the total whiteness faded to grey, and then to black.
Glossary * fall-line – the most direct route downhill
Q4: Focus this part of your answer on the second part of the source, from line 28 to the end.
In this part of the story, where Zoe and Jake are caught in the avalanche, it sounds really dangerous.
To what extent do you agree?
In your response, you could:
consider Zoe’s reactions in this part of the story
evaluate how the writer makes the situation sound dangerous
support your response with references to the text
What
The writer creates a tense and dramatic moment as an avalanche suddenly sweeps Zoe and Jake down the mountain.
How
Gradual increase in sound, starting with a small slip of snow and a quiet “rumble” that grows into a loud “roaring”.
Short, urgent dialogue such as “Get to the side! To the side!” to show panic.
Contrast in imagery – the avalanche first looks beautiful like “silky banners” and “heraldry of armies”, then becomes terrifying like a “tsunami at sea”.
Powerful similes and verbs, such as Zoe being “punched off her feet”, “twisting, spinning”, and “agitated inside a washing machine”.
Sudden change at the end from noise to silence and whiteness to “black”, creating a shocking finish.
Why
The writer uses these methods to make the reader feel the sudden danger and Zoe’s fear. The contrast between beauty and terror makes the avalanche more shocking. The fast pace and strong descriptions help us imagine how powerful and frightening the avalanche is. This keeps the reader hooked and worried about what will happen to Zoe.
Using these ideas, we can then craft a response. Notice how the structure can vary depending on the point you are making and the level. For example, in the Grade 4 response, you can see a much clearer use of What How Why (especially in the first paragraph), which becomes a bit more varied and ambitious by the last paragraph. Whereas in the Grade 9 response, the student is able to blend the ideas together more fluently and can easily bounce back and forth between evidence (How) and explanation (Why) to prove their point (What).
Grade 4
I agree that the writer makes this part of the story very exciting, tense and scary.
At the beginning, everything seems normal but then a small slab of snow slips under Zoe’s skis. This is the first sign of danger. Soon a quiet rumble starts and quickly gets louder until it turns into a loud roaring noise. Jake shouts urgently at Zoe to get to the side and hang onto a tree. This makes the reader feel worried and tense.
The writer uses strong descriptions to make the avalanche feel powerful and frightening. At first it looks beautiful, like “silky banners” and “the heraldry of armies”, which makes Zoe smile. Then suddenly it becomes terrifying, like a “tsunami at sea”. Zoe is thrown around “like being agitated inside a washing machine” and “punched off her feet”. These comparisons help the reader imagine how violent and out of control the avalanche is.
At the end, there is a scary chattering noise and then everything goes silent and turns black. This leaves the reader shocked.
Overall, the writer uses sounds, action and strong comparisons to build tension and make the avalanche scene dramatic and frightening.
Grade 9
I strongly agree that the writer creates a highly tense and dramatic moment in this extract. The language and structure work together effectively to build a sense of rising danger and chaos.
The tension begins subtly with a “small slab of snow” slipping under Zoe’s skis, which is compared to being “bucked”. This small warning quickly escalates as the “whisper” of skis is replaced by a rumble that grows into a deafening roar. The writer uses short, panicked sentences and urgent dialogue (“Get to the side! To the side!”) to speed up the pace and convey the characters’ fear.
A particularly effective technique is the shift in imagery. The avalanche is initially presented as almost beautiful, with “silky banners” and “the heraldry of armies”, which makes Zoe smile. This creates a moment of false calm before the horror is revealed — “her smile iced over”. The writer then uses powerful similes to show the violence of the event: the snow cloud is like “a tsunami at sea”, and Zoe is “punched off her feet”, “twisting, spinning” and “agitated inside a washing machine”. These vivid descriptions help the reader feel the disorienting, overwhelming power of the avalanche.
The extract ends with a sudden drop into silence and darkness as “the total whiteness faded to grey, and then to black.” This creates a dramatic and ominous conclusion.
Overall, through a combination of sensory language, contrast, pace and powerful imagery, the writer successfully immerses the reader in a thrilling and terrifying experience. The techniques used are very effective at building and sustaining tension throughout the passage.
Sample question and answer taken from AQA Language Paper 1 November 2019