I'm an assistant professor in the department of linguistics and philosophy at MIT.
I work in the philosophy of mind and language, metaphysics, and epistemology. My research focuses on the nature of representation and the structure of reality. In the course of pursuing these issues, I write about mental content, metaphysical determination, the vehicles of mental representation, and the connection between truth and different epistemic notions.
Before MIT, I was a Mellon postdoctoral fellow at Rutgers. Before that, I got my PhD from NYU, and my BA from the Hebrew University.
Forthcoming. Reliabilism and Defeat. Oxford Studies in Epistemology. (With Richard Roth.) [draft]
Rethinking the concept of reliability helps realibilism account for defeat.
Forthcoming. Epistemic Akrasia and Treacherous Propositions. Philosophical Quarterly. [preprint] [final]
Epistemic akrasia is impermissible for epistemic reasons.
2024. The Euthyphro Challenge in Metasemantics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. [preprint] [final]
Functionalist metasemantics fails because it reverses the order of explanation.
Naive Realism cannot explain our access to causally inefficacious domains.
Determination itself is asymmetric.
The content of a representation is determined by what causes its formation.
A paper developing a novel view of vehicles of representation. (With Verónica Gómez Sánchez.)
A paper about determination and extensibility.
2024. Explaining Content. [preprint]
Since determination is asymmetric (ch. 1), prominent metasemantic views fail to allow mental content to play its explanatory and justificatory role in our mental lives (ch. 2). We should adopt a causal-historical view instead (ch. 3).