If you want compact earbuds with a stated 40 ms audio latency and a dedicated Movie Mode for PS5, choose Back Bay Audio Mini; if you need a flexible neckband with sweat resistance and a battery display for workouts, choose MZQYRVK 5.2. For PS5 gaming, Back Bay Audio Mini is the clearer fit on the supplied specs: its low-latency figure is lower, and Movie Mode is specifically described for games and video. MZQYRVK 5.2 makes more sense when a neckband’s around-the-neck design and visible battery percentage matter more than the latency comparison.
• Back Bay Audio Mini’s biggest strength: compact earbuds with six ear-tip sizes, Extra Bass Mode, and a stated 40 ms latency. Trade-off: it is an in-ear design, so fit and comfort depend on choosing tips that suit your ears.
• MZQYRVK 5.2’s biggest strength: a flexible neckband, sweat-resistant construction, and an LED battery display. Trade-off: its stated latency is 150 ms, higher than Back Bay’s listed figure.
• Battery advantage: Back Bay specifies 32 hours total, including eight hours from the earbuds and 24 more from the case. The MZQYRVK sheet gives no battery runtime.
• Water and sweat: Back Bay lists an IPX7 rating but says the earbuds are not for swimming. MZQYRVK describes its design as sweat-resistant and suitable for light rain splashes.
• Who each pick is for: Back Bay suits a PS5 player who prioritizes the listed latency and bass mode; MZQYRVK suits someone who prefers a neckband for exercise and wants to see remaining battery percentage.
Back Bay Audio Mini is the more compact, case-based option. Its six ear-tip sizes, ranging from extra-small to XXL, give buyers more options for finding a secure in-ear fit. That is useful if standard earbuds feel too large or loose. It also has an Extra Bass Mode that can be switched on with a button, plus a listed Movie Mode intended to reduce audio delay while watching video or playing games.
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Updated: 2026-10-23 · 6 min read · Independent comparison
For PS5, the strongest case for Back Bay is its stated 40 ms audio latency, compared with 150 ms for MZQYRVK. The product information also explicitly connects Movie Mode to gaming. Those details make it the more convincing of these two if audio timing is the main concern. The specification sheet does not establish compatibility with every PS5 setup, though, so check how you plan to connect the earbuds before choosing.
Back Bay is also the more clearly documented choice for listening time: up to 32 hours in total, with eight hours per charge from the earbuds and another 24 hours from the case. It charges through USB-C and is listed as IPX7-rated, with the important caveat that it is not for swimming. Skip it if you specifically want a neckband or an on-device battery percentage display; neither is part of its described design.
MZQYRVK 5.2 uses an in-ear neckband design. The flexible band rests around the neck, while the earbuds sit in the ears. That layout may appeal to people who would rather keep the two earpieces connected than handle separate buds and a charging case. The product information also describes retractable earbuds and a power display on the control pod, which shows the remaining battery percentage.
Its stated strengths point more toward workouts and everyday mobile listening than toward PS5 gaming. MZQYRVK describes the earbuds and neck wire as sweat-resistant and says they can handle light rain splashes. Its dual dynamic drivers are presented as a way to produce deep bass alongside clear vocals and treble. That gives it a plausible appeal to listeners who like bass-forward music, although the information does not provide a direct sound comparison with Back Bay.
For gaming, the listed 150 ms latency is the key trade-off. MZQYRVK promotes low-latency use, but its product information gives a higher numerical latency than Back Bay’s 40 ms. That does not tell the whole story of how either device will perform in every setup, but on the figures provided, Back Bay is the more straightforward choice when minimizing delay is the priority. The MZQYRVK sheet does not specify battery runtime, so it is harder to judge for long sessions. Choose it for the neckband format and battery display, not for a documented battery-life advantage.
Side-by-Side: Which Should You Choose?
• Best for a neckband design → MZQYRVK 5.2. The flexible band connects the earbuds, which may suit people who prefer that style over separate wireless buds.
• Best for a small or difficult-to-fit ear canal → Back Bay Audio Mini. Six tip sizes offer more fit options, including extra-small and XXL.
• Best for a visible battery percentage → MZQYRVK 5.2. Its control pod includes an LED digital power display; Back Bay’s information does not describe one.
• Best documented battery runtime → Back Bay Audio Mini. Its stated total is 32 hours, while the MZQYRVK information does not give a runtime figure.
• Best for a clearly specified water-resistance rating → Back Bay Audio Mini. It lists IPX7, but is not intended for swimming. MZQYRVK is described as sweat-resistant and suited to light rain, without a comparable rating in the supplied details.
• Best for switching on extra bass with a button → Back Bay Audio Mini. MZQYRVK emphasizes dual-driver bass, but its information does not describe a selectable bass mode.
• Best for workouts where a connected neckband is your preference → MZQYRVK 5.2. Its flexible, sweat-resistant neckband design is aimed at sports use; Back Bay’s earbuds are also sweat- and water-resistant, but have no neckband.
I would choose Back Bay Audio Mini for PS5. Its listed 40 ms latency is lower than MZQYRVK’s 150 ms, and its Movie Mode is specifically associated with gaming and video. The six tip sizes and stated 32-hour total battery life add practical advantages beyond that use case. I’d choose MZQYRVK 5.2 instead if I wanted a neckband and a visible battery readout more than the lower listed latency.
FAQ
Neither product is described as a headband or as having active noise cancellation. Back Bay is an in-ear earbud with sound isolation listed; MZQYRVK is an in-ear neckband with passive noise cancellation listed.
Back Bay is the more direct match if you want a selectable bass feature: its Extra Bass Mode can be activated with a button. MZQYRVK also emphasizes deep bass from dual dynamic drivers, but the supplied information does not describe a separate bass mode.
Between these two, Back Bay Audio Mini has the lower listed latency at 40 ms, compared with 150 ms for MZQYRVK 5.2. Before choosing, check that your planned PS5 connection setup supports the earbuds; the supplied details do not specify every console connection method.
• Amazon Renewed Soundcore vs VOKALEN Hyper Pro Adaptive
• our GEEKRIA Sleep Earbuds vs CUAUUO Mini pick
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.