For the specific question of audio-technica ath-r50x vs sennheiser hd 560s, I’d lean toward the ATH-R50X for relaxed, spacious listening in a private space. The HD 560S makes more sense if analytical listening and directional detail matter more to you. Neither is a substitute for purpose-built sleep audio gear.
Audio-Technica ATH-R50X vs Sennheiser HD 560S at a Glance
• Audio-Technica ATH-R50X strength: 207 g listed weight, open-back sound, and two detachable cables. Trade-off: its open design provides no noise control and is meant for private listening.
• Sennheiser HD 560S strength: a neutral, analytical presentation with an angled-driver design intended to create a wide, articulate soundstage. Trade-off: it is a 240 g wired, open-back headphone with no noise control.
• Choose the ATH-R50X if you want a lighter listed weight, cable-length options, and a carrying pouch for studio or home use.
• Choose the HD 560S if you want to examine musical detail, compare audio sources, or use directional sound for gaming in a quiet environment.
• For sleeping, neither is a clear fit: both cover the ears, connect by cable, and have open backs that do not isolate you from room sound.
• Bottom line: I’d choose the ATH-R50X for general private listening and the HD 560S for focused, analytical listening.
The ATH-R50X is an open-back reference headphone designed around extended bass, accurate midrange, and a spacious presentation. Its fully open construction allows airflow through the earcups, while the product description associates that design with quick transient response and reduced internal resonance. That combination points toward music production and focused listening in a private room—not blocking the outside world during a commute or at bedtime.
At a listed 207 g, it is lighter than the HD 560S as listed. Its headband and replaceable velour earpads are described with long listening comfort in mind, and its open earcups are intended to keep air moving. The practical details are strong for someone moving between a desk and a listening chair: there are detachable 3.0 m and 1.2 m cables, a 6.3 mm adapter, and a carrying pouch. The listed impedance is 50 ohms, and the frequency range is 20 Hz to 20,000 Hz.
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Updated: 2026-10-15 · 8 min read · Independent comparison
I’d consider it for mixing, mastering, or listening at home when a spacious sound and cable flexibility matter. I would skip it for sleeping, noisy surroundings, or situations where sound leakage and outside noise are concerns. Its open-back design and wired connection make it a poor match for someone seeking a quiet, low-profile sleep setup.
The HD 560S is aimed at listeners who want to hear music in a neutral, analytical way. Sennheiser describes its sound as suited to checking differences between components, remasters, and media formats. The angled driver alignment is intended to recreate a speaker-like listening position and support a wide, articulate soundstage. For someone who likes to pick apart recordings rather than simply let them wash over the room, that is the central appeal.
Its open, around-ear construction and velour earpads are described as supporting a cool, barely-there feel during longer sessions. The product information also describes it as suitable for extended gaming, where a detailed presentation can help with locating sounds. The listed weight is 240 g, and the listed impedance is 120 ohms. It is wired, with a 6.3 mm jack and a 3.5 mm adapter.
I’d choose the HD 560S for attentive music listening, source comparisons, or gaming in a setting where an open-back headphone is appropriate. I would pass if I needed wireless use, noise control, or headphones designed to stay comfortable while lying on my side. Its analytical focus may also be less appealing to someone who wants a more casual, forgiving listening character.
• Best fit for a lighter listed headphone → Audio-Technica ATH-R50X. It is listed at 207 g, compared with 240 g for the HD 560S.
• Best for switching between cable lengths → Audio-Technica ATH-R50X. It comes with detachable 3.0 m and 1.2 m cables.
• Best for a more analytical listening brief → Sennheiser HD 560S. Its stated purpose includes examining audio differences and hearing recording detail.
• Best for a wide, speaker-like presentation → Sennheiser HD 560S. Its angled driver alignment is designed to support that kind of soundstage.
• Best for private studio work → Audio-Technica ATH-R50X. Its stated uses include mixing, mastering, and creating in a studio or private space.
• Best for directional gaming audio → Sennheiser HD 560S. Its description specifically connects detailed sound with locating direction during gaming.
• Best for sleeping → Neither. Both are wired, open-back, over-ear models, and neither lists noise control.
• Best for a carry pouch included → Audio-Technica ATH-R50X. Its listed accessories include one; the HD 560S information lists a cable, adapter, headphones, and manual.
The sleep question deserves a direct answer because “comfortable for long sessions” is not the same as “comfortable to sleep in.” Both models are over-ear headphones, and the open-back design leaves the listener connected to room sound rather than creating a quiet bubble. A cable can also be awkward around bedding. Those are design-based reasons to look elsewhere if you want something you can wear while sleeping, not claims about how either feels in bed.
That matters when comparing searches such as anc bone conduction headphones for sleeping or a volume limiting clip on earbuds for sleeping. Those phrases point toward different kinds of products and priorities. Neither headphone here is bone-conduction, neither is described as having active noise cancellation, and neither lists a volume-limiting clip. The useful comparison is therefore not which one wins as a sleep device, but which one better serves listening before bed while you are still sitting or reclining in a private space.
For gaming, the choice is more favorable to the HD 560S. Its description explicitly connects the headphone’s analytical sound with extended gaming and locating sound direction. The ATH-R50X can still suit gaming if you value its open presentation and lighter listed weight, but its stated focus is reference listening and production rather than gaming.
For everyday desk listening, the ATH-R50X’s two cable lengths offer a useful practical distinction. A shorter cable may be more manageable close to a device, while the longer option can serve a setup where the listening position is farther away. The HD 560S, by contrast, puts more emphasis on its neutral tuning and its ability to reveal differences in recordings. Neither is wireless, so the setup needs a compatible wired connection and room for the cable.
One specification worth noticing is impedance: the ATH-R50X is listed at 50 ohms, while the HD 560S is listed at 120 ohms. That is a real difference, but impedance alone does not establish how loud a headphone will play from every source. The listed sensitivities also differ—93.3 dB for the ATH-R50X and 110 dB for the HD 560S—and those figures should be interpreted alongside the source and measurement conditions rather than as a simple one-number winner. If you plan to connect either headphone to a particular device, check that device’s output and the headphone’s included connection options.
I’d buy the Audio-Technica ATH-R50X for private listening because its 207 g listed weight, two detachable cable lengths, and studio-oriented open-back design make it the more flexible fit for my priorities.
The Sennheiser HD 560S is my pick if analytical listening or directional gaming detail matters more.
For sleeping, I would choose neither: both are wired, over-ear, open-back headphones without noise control.
I’d use the ATH-R50X for listening before bed while seated—not as a headphone to wear through the night.
Neither is designed specifically for sleep. Both are wired, open-back, over-ear headphones, and neither lists noise control. Their designs are better suited to listening in a private space than wearing in bed overnight.
The HD 560S is expressly described as a neutral, analytical headphone for examining recordings and comparing audio sources. The ATH-R50X is described as a reference model with extended bass, accurate midrange, and a spacious presentation.
The ATH-R50X is listed at 207 g, while the HD 560S is listed at 240 g. Both product descriptions discuss comfort for extended listening, but those specifications alone do not establish which will fit an individual listener better.
The HD 560S is the clearer match based on its description, which highlights detailed sound and locating direction during gaming. Neither product’s supplied information lists a microphone, so do not assume either is a complete headset for voice chat.
• ACREO Open Ear vs Generic Sports Headband Headphones
• Avantree L171 vs Yunsailing 30 comparison
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.