At The Mention Of Your Name Mp3 //TOP\ Download

I need to raise my expectations and know that the name of Jesus sets the captives free, releases people into their destinies and is a mighty weapon against anything the enemy can throw at me. Listening to the song has really stirred my faith and it feels a bit like a battle cry and a love song mixed together in one.

There is power in the name of Jesus. I love this post. I am going to get that song on Itunes so I can listen to it, This is one of my favorite verses in the Bible: John 15:16 Ye have not chosen me, but I have chosen you, and ordained you, that ye should go and bring forth fruit, and that your fruit should remain: that whatsoever ye shall ask of the Father in my name, he may give it you.

-to-use-name-of-jesus-christ.html

At The Mention Of Your Name Mp3 Download

DOWNLOAD 🔥 https://ssurll.com/2y4PuF 🔥

This is more of a ux issue than a bug issue so I put it in UX.

Screenshot 2023-02-10 13.15.461365767 116 KB

To reproduce: Click on a place where your usercard is displayed. Then, click the mention. Your username will then be displayed in a weird postion.

When someone mentions you in a conversation, your name will be highlighted in yellow. You can also view all recent mentions of your name, along with any of your keyword notifications, on your desktop and mobile devices.

When someone mentions you in a conversation, your name will be highlighted in yellow. You can also view a complete list of all your recent activity: mentions of your name, keywords, threads, reactions, and app notifications. Just click Activity.

However, the problem is that I'm CC'd on a lot of email chains irrelevant to me, and when someone hits reply all, my name is always matched by Outlook rules because the quoted reply message contains the To: and CC: fields, where my name shows up.

I just got an email from Academia.edu saying that my name has been mentioned two times (Edit: now up to 150 papers!), but to see the mentions you have to upgrade to a premium account at 8.25AUD/month.

By searching on Google for my name in quotes and site:academia.edu I did find one paper that referenced a very old blog post I had written (and forgotten I had written!) But that's only one reference instead of two.

I do believe they are legit, but this mentions baiting reeks of dark patterns. If they continue doing this, they will lose credibility with the public, and end up losing the one thing people are willing to pay for, especially in research: a trusted reputation.

My name is very rare in my country (Google returns only 3 other results and none of them are doing research). Moreover, I added a hyphen to my name in publication, since our language consists of only one-syllable words. So I highly doubt that this is just a classification mistake.

That feature is only available to premium users. During the first month, you can email us to cancel and we'll refund you. So users can test-drive the mentions feature, and if they decide they don't like it, they can cancel. We think it's useful, and we don't want users to be coerced into using it.

Also, we do make mistakes. Sometimes we mistake a user for another academic with the same name! But Google finding only one paper with a name on academia.edu does not mean that there is only one paper that mentions that name on the site.

I have a college email address that was used when I was researching one paper, so I was easily able to look back at the number of times I get emails from Academia.edu, telling me that my name has been published in a paper.

Essentially, I have gotten the email every three weeks or so for that past two years (since I did my one-off research). I have a very unique name (I'm the only one in the world with it, actually), so to be cited in papers having to do with biostatistics, allergy, immunology, cognitive functions, mental health, and more is beyond ludicrous. My research had to do with food and the arts...

I agree that the "mentions" emails (1) are just trying to convince me to pay to subscribe and (2) are becoming less and less likely to be true mentions of my name. Today's was "A paper published in Biotechnology and Bioengineering mentions the name "---- --------"." (Using my real first and last names.) But I know for a fact that I am the only person in the world with my name if you include my first and last names, because they are a mix of ethnicities. And that includes all people who have ever lived, until a distant cousin happens to name someone with my first name - which isn't bloody likely.

I receive these messages on a weekly basis, with texts like "mentioned in influential papers" or "mentioned in a paper published in The Journal of xxx". I have a unique name, so it is clearly not correct.

Its not exactly a scam, but it is grossly exaggerating hits. I routinely get emails saying that there are hits on "Stirling Westrup", but there never are. There are often hits on 'S. Westrup' but none of them are me. Frankly, I consider this to be false advertising because what is being told in the email is completely false. If the email said "Stirling Westrup - when we search on variation on your name we get 15 hits!" It would be true, but not nearly so compelling. So, they chose false advertising over dull truth. Not a good sign for something that calls itself Academic.

I get e-mails from a.e every few weeks saying someone mentioned by name, trying to entice me to pay in order to learn more. I already try to keep track of who cites me. It's easy because few people do. :) It was easy to figure out which citations a.e meant every time.

they were all legitimate. My last name is relatively rare, but I do have some prolifically publishing relatives with the same last name, and even one cousin in Belgium with the same first and last names. Impressively, a.e never attributed other people's papers to me.

AE finds mentions of my not-uncommon name, including my first initial instead of my full first name. Across the year or two that I have subscribed, AE has found several thousand mentions (not as many as Google Scholar has) of which about 10% are mentions of my actual name in various forms (first initial instead of first name, etc.). I consider the AE service cost-effective.

Is there a way to show only (or skip to) the comments that mention me in a collaborative Word document? I am working on a large (100+ page) document with about a dozen people. I get an email every time someone mentions me in a comment, but clicking the link in the email simply opens a new copy of the document in my web browser (annoying). I don't see any way to skip to comments that mention me, in either the desktop or browser app. Am I missing something?

In the online version of the Word document (Microsoft 365), which is often pointed to when you get an email about a comment that mentions you, you cannot search within comments (e.g., to find the comment that mentions you). To search text in comments, you need to open the Desktop version of the Word. To do that, click on "Reviewing", then "Open in Desktop App". Once within the Desktop app, you can search text everywhere (including the comments) by "Ctrl + F".

Back to Spain, and then a four-day voyage to the Canary Islands, a visit which seems not to have quite met the high expectations of the romance of the name. On to Morocco, where the McGiverns have several pleasant surprises regarding the locals, and then to Nigeria, on the cusp of independence as a full member of the British Commonwealth, after decades of colonial occupation.

I suspect it may be hard to come by (I ordered mine for a rather large sum from an online rare book dealer, for the Maureen Daly connection) but if your library happens to have a copy hidden in the stacks, or if you chance upon it in a used book store, it is well worth delving into.

I am transgender. I legally changed my name a couple of years ago. I'm worried prospective employers might try to verify my older experience when I was using my old name, and conclude that I'm lying because those companies have no record of my current name. However, I don't want to mention the name change because it risks exposing me to discrimination. A prospective employer wouldn't otherwise be able to find out that I am transgender.

Background checking rarely happens at the resume shortlisting stage. It usually happens closer to the end of the hiring process. Keep your preferred name in the resume. When a company wants to make you a job offer, they will usually ask you to fill out a form for background checking. You can mention your past names in that form. However, I would personally suggest to let them know of your story at an earlier stage, if you feel comfortable doing so.

People change their names for all sorts of reasons, the most common being married women adopting their husband's surname. Hence, a candidate having a different past name would hardly strike any company as out of the ordinary, and they would most certainly have a process to deal with it.

I understand the risk of possible discrimination but if your potential employer is discriminating type, they will discriminate at any stage once they find out (and that can happen even AFTER you get that job).

You will save yourself great amount of time by making it clear from the beginning itself and take that risk. In my opinion and I could be wrong, having a transgender employee is a delicate issue for lot of employers and you better interview or work with people who are willing to understand and accommodate.

I would also emphasise not to underestimate the value your diverse perspectives and experience will bring to an organisation. It isn't something you need to hide but I understand you will want to be selective about how to approach it.

On any standard form, there is a space for "Previous names used" or some wording like that. Address it then. If they have a problem with you during the interview process, they WILL have a problem with you once you're hired.

While discrimination is illegal, you'll find that unless you have five to ten thousand dollars for a lawyer's retainer, and means of support to last for the years of litigation it will take to pursue a case, it doesn't matter. I've also seen employers use very dirty tricks to get rid of people just to get them "Fired for cause". When that happens, you've got "fired" on your employment record and can't collect unemployment. e24fc04721